Abstract
Much of the unsustainable activity that occurs in the world can be traced to organizations. Yet, because organizations are social systems, they cannot be managed for sustainability in the same way as ecosystems and natural resources. Using social systems theory, and employing the concepts of emergence, resilience and scale, I identify management principles for pursuing sustainability across an array of organizational contexts. These principles serve as a basis for an agenda to promote sustainability through logic models and experimentation. The UN Sustainable Development Goals provide an opportunity for putting these principles into action.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Strike, V. M., Gao, J. & Bansal, P. Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 37, 850–862 (2006).
Banerjee, S. B. Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly. Crit. Soc. 34, 51–79 (2008).
Fleming, T. & Zils, M. Toward a circular economy: Philips CEO Frans van Houten. McKinsey Quarterly (February 2014).
Stephens, J. C., Frumhoff, P. C. & Yona, L. The role of college and university faculty in the fossil fuel divestment movement. Elem. Sci. Anth. 6, 41 (2018).
Boudet, H. et al. Effects of a behaviour change intervention for Girl Scouts on child and parent energy-saving behaviours. Nat. Energy 1, 16091 (2016).
Hatch, M. J. Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).
Scott, W. R. & Davis, G. F. Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives (Routledge, 2015).
Tsoukas, H. & Knudsen, C. The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
Shenhav, Y. A. Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).
Davis, G. F. Do theories of organizations progress? Org. Res. Meth. 13, 690–709 (2010).
Morgan, G. Images of Organization (Sage, 1986).
Scott, W. R. Institutions and Organizations (Sage, 1995).
March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. Organizations (Wiley, 1958).
Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness (Jossey-Bass, 1974).
Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. The population ecology of organizations. Am. J. Soc. 82, 929–964 (1977).
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. The External Control of Organizations (Harper and Row, 1978).
Etzion, D. Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992–present: a review. J. Manag. 33, 637–664 (2007).
Bansal, P., Kim, A. & Wood, M. O. Hidden in plain sight: the importance of scale in organizations’ attention to issues. Acad. Man. Rev. 43, 217–241 (2018).
Williamson, O. E. Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Q. 36, 269–296 (1991).
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ann. Rev. Env. Res. 30, 441–473 (2005).
Berkes, F. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J. Env. Manage. 90, 1692–1702 (2009).
Stankey, G. H., Clark, R. N. & Bormann, B. T. Adaptive Management of Natural Resources: Theory, Concepts, and Management Institutions Report PNW-GTR-654 (USDA, 2005).
Rist, L., Felton, A., Samuelsson, L., Sandström, C. & Rosvall, O. A new paradigm for adaptive management. Ecol. Soc. 18, 63 (2013).
Edmondson, A. C. Wicked problem solvers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94, 52–59 (2016).
DeFries, R. & Nagendra, H. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356, 265–270 (2017).
Rittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Pol. Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973).
Verweij, M. et al. Clumsy solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Admin. 84, 817–843 (2006).
Checkland, P. Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Sys. Res. Behav. Sci. 17, S11 (2000).
Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (Wiley, 1981).
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. & Obstfeld, D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Org. Sci. 16, 409–421 (2005).
Daft, R. L. & Weick, K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Man. Rev. 9, 284–295 (1984).
Simon, H. A. Administrative Behavior (Macmillan, 1947).
Vaughan, D. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (Univ. Chicago Press, 1997).
Holling, C. S. & Meffe, G. K. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv. Biol. 10, 328–337 (1996).
Martin, R. L. The big lie of strategic planning. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92, 3–8 (2014).
Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J. A. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strat. Man. J. 6, 257–272 (1985).
Mintzberg, H. Crafting strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 65, 66–75 (1987).
Plowman, D. A. et al. Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change. Acad. Man. J. 50, 515–543 (2007).
Garud, R. & Karnøe, P. Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Pol. 32, 277–300 (2003).
Karnøe, P. & Garud, R. Path creation: co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. Eur. Plan. Stud. 20, 733–752 (2012).
Sabel, C. F. & Victor, D. G. Governing global problems under uncertainty: making bottom-up climate policy work. Clim. Change 144, 15–27 (2015).
Holling, C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Eco. Sys. 4, 1–23 (1973).
Biggs, R. et al. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu. Rev. Env. Res. 37, 421–448 (2012).
Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M. & De Cremer, D. Successful organizational change: integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Acad. Man. Ann. 12, 752–788 (2018).
Broman, G. I. & Robèrt, K.-H. A framework for strategic sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 17–31 (2017).
Pidgeon, N. & Fischhoff, B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 35 (2011).
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E. & Garrett, R. K. The partisan brain: how dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. Ann. Amer. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 658, 36–66 (2015).
Kahan, D. M. et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 732–735 (2012).
Kay, J. Obliquity: Why Our Goals are Best Achieved Indirectly (Profile Books, 2011).
Eccles, R. G. & Nohria, N. Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management (Beard Books, 1992).
Ferraro, F., Etzion, D. & Gehman, J. Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: robust action revisited. Org. Stud. 36, 363–390 (2015).
Padgett, J. F. & Ansell, C. K. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Am. J. Soc. 98, 1259–1319 (1993).
Whittier, N. Rethinking coalitions: anti-pornography feminists, conservatives, and relationships between collaborative adversarial movements. Soc. Prob. 61, 175–193 (2014).
Gillis, J. & Popovich, N. In Trump country, renewable energy is thriving. New York Times (6 June 2017).
Costello, C., Gaines, S. & Gerber, L. R. Conservation science: a market approach to saving the whales. Nature 481, 139–140 (2012).
Pinch, T. J. & Bijker, W. E. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14, 399–441 (1984).
Seelos, C. & Mair, J. Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: a strategic view. Acad. Man. Persp. 21, 49–63 (2007).
Duke, D. Why don’t BOP ventures solve the environmental problems they initially set out to address? Org. Env. 29, 508–528 (2016).
Ehrenstein, V. & Neyland, D. On scale work: evidential practices and global health interventions. Econ. Soc. 47, 59–82 (2018).
Gonzalez-Vega, C. & Villafani-Ibarnegaray, M. in The Handbook of Microfinance (eds Armendáriz, B. & Labie, M.) 203–250 (World Scientific, 2011).
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B. & Lehmann-Ortega, L. Building social business models: lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Plan. 43, 308–325 (2010).
Mintzberg, H. The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, 1979).
Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68, 79–91 (1990).
Porter, M. E. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 65, 43–59 (1987).
Meadows, D. H. Places to intervene in a system. Whole Earth 91, 78–84 (1997).
Salisbury, C. Paying for health care with trees: A win-win for orangutans and communities. Pacific Standard (4 April 2017).
Mair, J., Wolf, M. & Seelos, C. Scaffolding: a process of transforming patterns of inequality in small-scale societies. Acad. Man. J. 59, 2021–2044 (2016).
Poister, T. H. Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations (Jossey-Bass, 2003).
The Water for Life Decade 2005–2015 and Beyond (UN Water Decade Programme on Advocacy and Communication, 2015).
Uvin, P., Jain, P. S. & Brown, L. D. Think large and act small: toward a new paradigm for NGO scaling up. World Dev. 28, 1409–1419 (2000).
McLaughlin, J. A. & Jordan, G. B. in Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (eds Wholey, J. S., Hatry, H. P. & Newcomer, K. E.) 55–80 (2010).
Rogers, P. J. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation 14, 29–48 (2008).
Weitz, N., Carlsen, H., Nilsson, M. & Skånberg, K. Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda. Sust. Sci. 13, 531–548 (2018).
Le Blanc, D. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sust. Dev. 23, 176–187 (2015).
Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN, 2015).
Food Wastage Footprint: Full Cost Accounting (FAO, 2014).
Weitz, N., Nilsson, M. & Davis, M. A nexus approach to the post-2015 agenda: formulating integrated water, energy, and food SDGs. SAIS Rev. Int. Aff. 34, 37–50 (2014).
Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C. & Sonesson, U. Global Food Losses and Food Waste (FAO, 2011).
Wilkie, W. L. & Moore, E. S. Marketing’s contributions to society. J. Market. 63, 198–218 (1999).
Ewen, S. Captains of Consciousness: Advertising and the Social Roots of the Consumer Culture (McGraw-Hill, 1976).
Ansell, C. & Bartenberger, M. in New Perspectives on Technology in Society: Experimentation Beyond the Laboratory (eds van de Poel, I., Asveld, L. & Mehos, D. C.) 36–58 (Routledge, 2017).
Rist, L., Campbell, B. M. & Frost, P. Adaptive management: where are we now? Env. Cons. 40, 5–18 (2013).
Gordon, A., Becerra, L. & Fressoli, M. Potentialities and constraints in the relation between social innovation and public policies: some lessons from South America. Ecol. Soc. 22, 2 (2017).
Kemp, R. The Dutch energy transition approach. Int. Econ. Econ. Pol. 7, 291–316 (2010).
Gross, N. Pragmatism and the study of large-scale social phenomena. Theory Soc. 47, 87–111 (2018).
Hawken, P. Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming (Penguin, 2017).
George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A. & Tihanyi, L. Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Man. J. 59, 1880–1895 (2016).
Reid, W. V. et al. Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330, 916–917 (2010).
Acknowledgements
McGill’s Centre for Strategy Studies in Organizations (CSSO) supported this research. I thank E. Bennett, A. Gonzalez, A. Li., H. McShane and D. Pencheon for valuable suggestions and feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etzion, D. Management for sustainability. Nat Sustain 1, 744–749 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0184-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0184-z
This article is cited by
-
Return to Reintegration? Towards a Circular-Economy-Inspired Management Paradigm
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2023)
-
Managing the Sustainable Development of Municipalities in the Context of the Implementation of the SDGs
Public Organization Review (2023)
-
Cities and the SDGs: Realities and possibilities of local engagement in global frameworks
Ambio (2022)
-
A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability
Nature Sustainability (2020)
-
Round four on the environment
Nature Sustainability (2019)