Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss

An Author Correction to this article was published on 10 August 2020

This article has been updated

The development of the post-2020 strategic plan for the Convention on Biological Diversity provides a vital window of opportunity to set out an ambitious plan of action to restore global biodiversity. The components of such a plan, including its goal, targets and some metrics, already exist and provide a roadmap to 2050.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Biodiversity declines have continued despite repeated policy commitments aimed at slowing or halting the rate of loss.
Fig. 2: Required trajectories for three biodiversity indicators.

Change history

References

  1. 1.

    Tittensor, D. P. et al. Science 346, 241–244 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McRae, L., Deinet, S. & Freeman, R. PLoS ONE 12, e0169156 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Proença, V. & Pereira, H. M. Ref. Mod. Life Sci. https://doi.org/csjx (2017).

  4. 4.

    Thomas, C. D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19187–19188 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Newbold, T. et al. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Griscom, B. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Oliver, T. H. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 673–684 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Isbell, F. et al. Nature 546, 65–72 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pacala, S. & Socolow, R. Science 305, 968–972 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Butchart, S. H. M. et al. PLoS ONE 2, e140 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Newbold, T. et al. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mace, G. M. et al. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 289–297 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Steffen, W. et al. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Obersteiner, M. et al. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501499 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 98, 303–323 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge advice and input from L. McRae, M. Obersteiner, D. van Vuuren, D. Nel, R. Shaw, N. Sticzy, M. Wright and L. Young. We also received helpful comments from H. Pereira. S.E.C. acknowledges part-funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene, grant no. ERC-2016-ADG 743080).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgina M. Mace.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Tables 1,2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mace, G.M., Barrett, M., Burgess, N.D. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nat Sustain 1, 448–451 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0130-0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links