Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence that organic farming promotes pest control

This article has been updated


Ecological intensification of agro-ecosystems, based on the optimization of ecological functions such as biological pest control, to replace agrochemical inputs is a promising route to reduce the ecological footprint of agriculture while maintaining commodity production. However, the performance of organic farming, often considered as a prototype of ecological intensification, in terms of pest control remains largely unknown. Here, using two distinct meta-analyses, we demonstrate that, compared to conventional cropping systems, (i) organic farming promotes overall biological pest control potential, (ii) organic farming has higher levels of overall pest infestations but (iii) that this effect strongly depends on the pest type. Our study shows that there are lower levels of pathogen infestation, similar levels of animal pest infestation and much higher levels of weed infestation in organic than in conventional systems. This study provides evidence that organic farming can enhance pest control and suggests that organic farming offers a way to reduce the use of synthetic pesticide for the management of animal pests and pathogens without increasing their levels of infestation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Overview of all the study sites included in the meta-analysis where primary studies comparing pest infestation and/or biological control levels between organic and conventional farming systems have been conducted.
Fig. 2: Impact of organic management on biological control, as influenced by pest type, number of pest species monitored, experimental conditions of the study and crop type.
Fig. 3: Impact of organic management on pest infestation, as influenced by pest type, number of pest species monitored, experimental conditions of the study, crop type, location of the pest attack and number of years since the conversion to organic farming.

Change history

  • 14 December 2018

    In this Supplementary Information file originally published, the first equation in Methods was illegible; this has now been amended.


  1. 1.

    Tilman, D. & Clark, M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515, 518–522 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jones, B. A. et al. Zoonosis emergence linked to agricultural intensification and environmental change. PNAS 110, 8399–8404 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cassman, K. G. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5952–5959 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D. & Potts, S. G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 230–238 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tittonell, P. Ecological intensification of agriculture—sustainable by nature. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 8, 53–61 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    IFOAM. The IFOAM Norms for Organic Production and Processing. Version 2005 (International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, 2006).

  8. 8.

    Seufert, V. & Ramankutty, N. Many shades of gray—the context-dependent performance of organic agriculture. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602638 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229–232 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ponisio, L. C. et al. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20141396 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Gattinger, A. et al. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18226–18231 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kennedy, M. C. et al. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee polliniators in agrosystems. Ecol. Lett. 16, 584–599 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kremen, C. & Miles, A. Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecol. Soc. 17, 40 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Garibaldi, L. A. et al. Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 68–80 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J. & Weibull, A.-C. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 261–269 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tuck, S. L. et al. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 746–755 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lichtenberg, E. M. et al. A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4946–4957 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Garratt, M. P. D., Wright, D. J. & Leather, S. R. The effects of farming system and fertilisers on pests and natural enemies: a synthesis of current research. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 141, 261–270 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gabriel, D. et al. Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 13, 858–869 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Koss, A. M., Jensen, A. S., Schreiber, A., Pike, K. S. & Snyder, W. E. Comparison of predator and pest communities in Washington potato fields treated with broad-spectrum, selective, or organic insecticides. Environ. Entomol. 34, 87–95 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Letourneau, D. K., Jedlicka, J. A., Bothwell, S. G. & Moreno, C. R. Effects of natural enemy biodiversity on the suppression of arthropod herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 573–592 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Crowder, D. W., Northfield, T. D., Strand, M. R. & Snyder, W. E. Organic agriculture promotes evenness and natural pest control. Nature 466, 109–112 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Darnhofer, I., Schneeberger, W. & Freyer, B. Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: farmer types and their rationale. Agric. Human. Values 22, 39–52 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Mayerhofer, T. What is this thing called organic?—How organic farming is codified in regulations. Food Policy 68, 10–20 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Scherber, C. et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468, 553–556 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Letourneau, D. K. et al. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. Ecol. Appl. 21, 9–21 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hibbing, M. E., Fuqua, C., Parsek, M. R. & Peterson, S. B. Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 15–25 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vorholt, J. A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 828–840 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Finke, D. L. & Denno, R. F. Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429, 407–410 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cardinale, B. J., Harvey, C. T., Gross, K. & Ives, A. R. Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem. Ecol. Lett. 6, 857–865 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schneider, M. K. et al. Gains to species diversity in organically farmed fields are not propagated at the farm level. Nat. Commun. 5, 4151 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mundt, C. C. Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40, 381–410 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Van Bruggen, A. H. C. & Finckh, M. R. Plant diseases and management approaches in organic farming systems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 25–54 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Norton, L. et al. Consequences of organic and non-organic farming practices for field, farm and landscape complexity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 129, 221–227 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Iverson, A. L. et al. Do polycultures promote win-wins or trade-offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1593–1602 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Denno, R. F., McClure, M. S. & Ott, J. R. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reexamined and resurrected. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40, 297–331 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kaplan, I. & Denno, R. F. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory. Ecol. Lett. 10, 977–994 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Desneux, N., Decourtye, A. & Delpuech, J.-M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52, 81–106 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Edwards-Jones, O. H. The origin and hazard of inputs to crop protection in organic farming systems: are they sustainable? Agric. Syst. 67, 31–47 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Drews, S., Neuhoff, D. & Köpke, U. Weed suppression ability of three winter wheat varieties at different row spacing under organic farming conditions. Weed Res. 49, 526–533 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Requier, F. et al. Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds. Ecol. Appl. 25, 881–890 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gaba, S., Gabriel, E., Chadø euf, J., Bonneu, F. & Bretagnolle, V. Herbicides do not ensure for higher wheat yield, but eliminate rare plant species. Sci. Rep. 6, 30112 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Muneret, L., Thiéry, D., Joubard, B. & Rusch, A. Deployment of organic farming at a landscape scale maintains low pest infestation and high crop productivity levels in vineyards. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 1516–1525 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chaplin-Kramer, R., O’Rourke, M. E., Blitzer, E. J. & Kremen, C. A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol. Lett. 14, 922–932 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mehrabi, Z. The conventional versus alternative agricultural divide: a response to Garibaldi et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 720–721 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    van Bniggen, A. H. & Termorskuizen, A. J. Integrated approaches to root disease management in organic farming systems. Australas. Plant Pathol. 32, 141–156 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stavi, I., Bel, G. & Zaady, E. Soil functions and ecosystem services in conventional, conservation, and integrated agricultural systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36, 1–12 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Briar, S. S., Wichman, D. & Reddy, G. V. in Organic Farming for Sustainable Agriculture 107–122 (Springer, Switzerland, 2016).

  49. 49.

    Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Nakagawa, S., Noble, D. W., Senior, A. M. & Lagisz, M. Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists. BMC Biol. 15, 18 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Koricheva, J., Gurevitch, J. & Mengersen, K. Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press: Princeton, NJ, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V. & Valentine, J. C. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2009).

  53. 53.

    Johnson, J. B. & Omland, K. S. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 101–108 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Borenstein, M., Higgins, J. P. T., Hedges, L. V. & Rothstein, H. R. Basics of meta-analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res. Synth. Methods 8, 5–18 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    R Core Team. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. (2016).

Download references


We are grateful to the authors of primary studies who provided us with additional data and to B. Castagneyrol and D. Makowski for helpful discussions and relevant advice about the analyses. We thank four anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their many insightful comments. We also thank T. Nesme for helpful discussions and M. Desailly for her help in collecting the literature. This research was funded by the Région Aquitaine (REGUL project), the Région Bretagne (ARANEAE) and the Agence Française pour la Biodiversité (ex-ONEMA), and the joint call ‘Biodiversité-Ecophyto’ between Ecophyto and the French National Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (SOLUTION project). This study was also supported by the FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IRSES fund (project APHIWEB, grant number 611810). This study has been carried out in the framework of the Cluster of Excellence COTE.

Author information




L.M., E.A.D., S.A., J.P., M.P., D.T. and A.R. conceived the work and designed the study. M.M. and V.S. contributed to data analysis and interpretation of the results. L.M. and A.R. collected the data, analysed the data, interpreted the results and led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrien Rusch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-9, Supplementary Tables 2-14, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary References 1-19

Table S1

List of the studies included in the meta-analyses

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muneret, L., Mitchell, M., Seufert, V. et al. Evidence that organic farming promotes pest control. Nat Sustain 1, 361–368 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing