Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

Progress towards sustainable intensification in China challenged by land-use change


China is experiencing rapid land-use change and shifts in farm management. However, the interactive effects of these drivers on cropping system sustainability are unclear. Here, we evaluate spatio-temporal trade-offs among crop production and five key environmental indicators, including land use, water consumption, excess nitrogen and phosphorous use, and greenhouse gas emissions in China. From 1987 to 2010, as crop kilocalorie production increased (+66%), so did the total environmental impact of all indicators (+1.3–161%) except greenhouse gas emissions (−18%). Concurrently, environmental intensity—impact per kilocalorie produced—decreased for all indicators (−51–−13%) except excess phosphorus (+57%). Despite substantial loss and displacement of cropland to urban expansion, counterfactual scenario analysis indicates that farm management explained >90% of changes in crop production and environmental impact. However, cropland is expanding in regions of relatively high land and irrigation intensity. Although efficiency gains partly compensated for increased environmental pressures, continued geographic shifts in cropland could challenge progress towards agricultural sustainability in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Spatial distribution of changes in China from 1987 to 2010.
Fig. 2: Improvement in five environmental intensity indicators by county from 1987 to 2010 in China.
Fig. 3: Priority environmental indicator to target in different areas in China.
Fig. 4: Comparison of the average environmental intensity of areas where cropland was unchanged, cropland was gained and cropland was lost in China.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, DVD edn (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2017).

  2. FAOSTAT: FAOSTAT Online Statistical Service (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2017);

  3. Seto, K. C. & Ramankutty, N. Hidden linkages between urbanization and food systems. Science 352, 943–945 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2013 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the Food and Agriculture Organization, 2013).

  5. Liu, G., Liu, X. & Cheng, S. Food security: curb China’s rising food wastage. Nature 498, 170–170 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Data: Online Statistical Service (National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China 2017);

  7. Liu, J. et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s. J. Geogr. Sci. 24, 195–210 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, H., Liu, J., Huang, H. Q., Tao, B. & Cao, M. Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Glob. Planet. Change 67, 13–19 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Du, T., Kang, S., Zhang, X. & Zhang, J. China’s food security is threatened by the unsustainable use of water resources in North and Northwest China. Food Energy Secur. 3, 7–18 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, J., Xu, C. C., Ridoutt, B. G., Wang, X. C. & Ren, P. A. Nitrogen and phosphorus losses and eutrophication potential associated with fertilizer application to cropland in China. J. Clean. Prod. 159, 171–179 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, C. & Tian, H. Net greenhouse gas balance in response to nitrogen enrichment: perspectives from a coupled biogeochemical model. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 571–588 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. West, P. C. et al. Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 345, 325–328 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garnett, T. et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 33–34 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, Y. et al. Addressing China’s grand challenge of achieving food security while ensuring environmental sustainability. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400039 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cui, K. & Shoemaker, S. P. A look at food security in China. NPJ Sci. Food 2, 4 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun, W. & Huang, Y. Synthetic fertilizer management for China’s cereal crops has reduced N2O emissions since the early 2000s. Environ. Pollut. 160, 24–27 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cui, Z. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Annual Report on Forestry Statistics in China: 2014 (in Chinese) (State Forestry Bureau, 2014);

  19. Ghose, B. Food security and food self-sufficiency in China: from past to 2050. Food Energy Secur. 3, 86–95 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Erb, K.-H. et al. Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11382 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bren d'Amour, C. et al. Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8939–8944 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, F., Chen, X. & Vitousek, P. Chinese agriculture: an experiment for the world. Nature 497, 33–35 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang, S. et al. Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: from research to practice. Agric. Water Manag. 179, 5–17 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brauman, K. A., Siebert, S. & Foley, J. A. Improvements in crop water productivity increase water sustainability and food security—a global analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024030 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlson, K. M. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 63–68 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clark, M. & Tilman, D. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 064016 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, L. & Liu, Y. Analysis of the impact of off-farm employment of agricultural labor on grain production in Shandong Province and Henan Province. Agric. Sci. Technol. 13, 1609–1615 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brauman, K. A., Richter, B. D., Postel, S., Malsy, M. & Flörke, M. Water depletion: an improved metric for incorporating seasonal and dry-year water scarcity into water risk assessments. Elementa 4, 000083 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sui, X. Analysis on Spatial Patterns on Fertilizer Application and its Impacts on Crop Production in China. PhD thesis, China Agricultural Univ. (2007).

  31. Zhang, W., Yu, Y., Huang, Y., Li, T. & Wang, P. Modeling methane emissions from irrigated rice cultivation in China from 1960 to 2050. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3511–3523 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fang, J., Chen, A., Peng, C., Zhao, S. & Ci, L. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 292, 2320–2322 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Deng, L. et al. Past and future carbon sequestration benefits of China’s grain for green program. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 13–20 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gilles, B., Luis, L. & Josette, G. A vast range of opportunities for feeding the world in 2050: trade-off between diet, N contamination and international trade. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 025001 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang, Y. et al. Higher yields and lower methane emissions with new rice cultivars. Glob. Change Biol. 00, 1–11 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J. & Garnier, J. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105011 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lun, F., Liu, J. & Zhang, D. Trends in cropland P balance and P use efficiency in China from 1961 to 2011 (in Chinese). Resour. Sci. 38, 1681–1691 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mueller, N. D. et al. A tradeoff frontier for global nitrogen use and cereal production. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 054002 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. IFADATA (International Fertilizer Association, 2017);

  40. Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A. W. D. T. & Yang, H. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 315–358 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, H., Xu, F., Wu, Y., Hu, H. H. & Dai, X. F. Progress of potato staple food research and industry development in China. J. Integr. Agric. 16, 2924–2932 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li, J., Deng, X. & Seto, K. C. The impact of urban expansion on agricultural land use intensity in China. Land Use Policy 35, 33–39 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Distribution Patterns on Reserved Arable Land in China (Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China, 2016);

  44. Zuo, L. et al. Multitemporal analysis of cropland transition in a climate-sensitive area: a case study of the arid and semiarid region of northwest China. Reg. Environ. Change 14, 75–89 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zuo, L., Wang, X., Liu, F. & Yi, L. Spatial exploration of multiple cropping efficiency in China based on time series remote sensing data and econometric model. J. Integr. Agric. 12, 903–913 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ye, L. et al. Climate change impact on China food security in 2050. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 363–374 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Trimmer, J. T., Cusick, R. D., & Guest, J. S. Amplifying progress toward multiple development goals through resource recovery from sanitation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 10765–10776 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, Z. et al. A 2010 update of National Land Use/Cover Database of China at 1:100000 scale using medium spatial resolution satellite images. Remote Sens. Environ. 149, 142–154 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Siebert, S. & Döll, P. Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation. J. Hydrol. 384, 198–217 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. IPCC 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IGES, 2006).

  51. AgriData (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2014);

  52. Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, 89–102 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Fertilizer Use by Crop (IFA, IFDC, IPI, PPI & FAO, 2002).

  54. Heffer, P. Assessment of Fertilizer Use by Crop at the Global Level, Annex 1–8 (International Fertilizer Industry Association, 2009).

  55. Li, H., Zhang, W., Zhang, F., Du, F. & Li, L. Chemical fertilizer use and efficiency change of main grain crops in China (in Chinese). Plant Nutr. Fertil. Sci. 16, 1136–1143 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, W. & Zhang, F. The Development of Fertilizer in China (in Chinese) (China Agricultural Univ. Press, Beijing, 2012)

  57. Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gap through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Smil, V. Nitrogen in crop production: An account of global flows. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 647–662 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dentener, F. et al. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, 16615–16615 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Liu, X. et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494, 459–462 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Agricultural Waste Field Management Handbook, Vol. NEH-651 (US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 1999).

  62. Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 714 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  63. Butterbach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E. M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R. & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls?. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 368, 122–134 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Gerber, J. S. et al. Spatially explicit estimates of N2O emissions from croplands suggest climate mitigation opportunities from improved fertilizer management. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3383–3394 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Shi, X. Z. et al. Soil database of 1:1,000,000 digital soil survey and reference system of the Chinese Genetic Soil Classification System. Soil Surv. Horiz. 45, 129–136 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. IPCC 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands (IPCC, 2013).

  67. Zhang, X. 1:1,000,000 Vegetation Map In China (in Chinese) (Geological Press, 2007).

  68. National Fundamental Geographic Database (National Geomatics Center of China, National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, 1998).

  69. Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2) (FAO and IIASA, 2012).

  70. Climatic Zone Layer (European Soil Portal, European Commission Joint Research Centre);

  71. Hansis, E., Davis, S. J. & Pongratz, J. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1230–1246 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank N.D. Mueller from University of California-Irvine for help in developing crop-specific fertilizer application rate dataset. This work benefited from the comments of H. Tian from Auburn University and J. Hellmann from University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Funding was provided by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFE0104600), National Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (No. 2017ZX07101001), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the Belmont Forum/FACCE-JPI funded DEVIL project (NE/M021327/1). K.M.C. was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project HAW01136-H managed by the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resource. G.K.M. was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



L.Z., Z.Z., P.C.W. and J.S.G. designed the study. L.Z., Z.Z., Y.L., W.Z., W.W., X.Z., X.W., B.L., L.Y., Q.W., F.L., J.X., S.H., F.S., K.M.C. and K.A.B. prepared the data and/or carried out modelling. L.Z., Z.Z., K.M.C., G.K.M., K.A.B. and H.Z. analysed the data. L.Z., K.M.C., G.K.M., K.A.B., P.C.W. and J.S.G. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lijun Zuo.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-10, Supplementary Tables 1-13, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary References 1-35

Supplementary Dataset 1

Crop-specific production and environmental impacts for each indicator and each year

Supplementary Dataset 2

Ratio of crops planted in main season in each province for each period

Supplementary Dataset 3

Crop-specific nutrient application rates

Supplementary Dataset 4

Irrigation rate for each crop in each province

Supplementary Dataset 5

Ratio of irrigated crops planted in main season in each province for each period

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuo, L., Zhang, Z., Carlson, K.M. et al. Progress towards sustainable intensification in China challenged by land-use change. Nat Sustain 1, 304–313 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene