Comment | Published:

Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative

The Belt and Road Initiative will greatly influence the future of global trade. However, it may also promote permanent environmental degradation. We call for rigorous strategic environmental and social assessments, raising the bar for environmental protection worldwide.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Chin, H. & He, W. The Belt and Road Initiative: 65 Countries and Beyond (Global Sourcing, Fung Business Intelligence Centre, 2016); https://go.nature.com/2qkXrvs.

  2. 2.

    Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road (National Development and Reform Commission, China, 2015); https://go.nature.com/2HmLjm0.

  3. 3.

    The Belt and Road Ecological and Environmental Cooperation Plan (Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China, 2017); https://go.nature.com/2Exc7No.

  4. 4.

    Laurance, W. F., Sloan, S., Weng, L. & Sayer, J. A. Curr. Biol. 25, 3202–3208 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Laurance, W. F. et al. Nature 513, 229–232 (2014).

  6. 6.

    van der Ree, R., Grilo, C. & Smith, D. J. Handbook of Road Ecology. (Wiley: Chichester, 2015).

  7. 7.

    Laurance, W. F., Goosem, M. & Laurance, S. G. W. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 659–669 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Leadley, P. et al. Bioscience 64, 665–679 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Li, N. & Shvarts, E. The Belt and Road Initiative: WWF Recommendations and Spatial Analysis Briefing Paper (WWF, 2017); https://go.nature.com/2v3SwoG.

  10. 10.

    Mascia, M. B. et al. Biol. Conserv. 169, 355–361 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Torres, A., Brandt, J. S., Lear, K. & Liu, J. Science 357, 970–971 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Chen, J., Zhao, F., Liu, Z., Ou, X. & Hao, H. J. Clean. Prod. 168, 1039–1047 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Liu, D., Yamaguchi, K. & Yoshikawa, H. Energy Policy 107, 403–412 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Liu, H. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1037–1041 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Rosa, I. M. D. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1416–1419 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Lü, Y. et al. Sci. Rep. 5, 8732 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Jinping, X. Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era Report at 19th CPC National Congress (Xinhua, 2017); https://go.nature.com/2GJFr9t.

  19. 19.

    Hallegatte, S. et al. Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty (World Bank, 2016); https://go.nature.com/2JxNIuO.

  20. 20.

    Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2015); http://go.nature.com/28TEATX.

  21. 21.

    Liu, X. et al. Environ. Int. 85, 46–53 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Tracy, E. F., Shvarts, E., Simonov, E. & Babenko, M. Eurasia. Geogr. Econ. 58, 56–88 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Yang, D. et al. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2, e01242 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Wu, J., Chang, I.-S., Bina, O., Lam, K.-C. & Xu, H. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 31, 77–84 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Lechner, A. M., Chan, F. K. S. & Campos-Arceiz, A. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 408–409 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Mahmoud, M. I. et al. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 10, 194008291770927 (2017).

  27. 27.

    Cannon, J. C. Cross River superhighway changes course in Nigeria. Mongabay (28 April 2017); https://go.nature.com/2qfVAJk.

  28. 28.

    Laurance, W. F. & Burgués Arrea, I. Science 358, 442–444 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Partidário, M. R. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manag. 17, 1–8 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Hopcraft, J. G. C., Bigurube, G., Lembeli, J. D. & Borner, M. PLoS ONE 10, e0130577 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Asian Development Bank BAN: SASEC Chittagong – Cox’s Bazar Railway Project: Phase 1 Environmental Impact Assessment (Ministry of Railways, Bangladesh, 2016); https://go.nature.com/2GKzWqK.

  32. 32.

    De Montis, A., Ledda, A. & Caschili, S. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 61, 78–87 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability (International Finance Corporation, 2012); https://go.nature.com/2IDnJRd.

  34. 34.

    Huadong, G. Nature 554, 25–27 (2018).

  35. 35.

    Wang, Y., Guan, L., Piao, Z., Wang, Z. & Kong, Y. Transp. Res. D. Transp. Environ. 50, 119–128 (2017).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Fernando Ascensão.

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Further reading

Fig. 1: Main trade corridors (Silk Road Economic Belt and twenty-first-century Maritime Silk Road) from and to China and some of the most important infrastructure and ports built or planned with Chinese investment in the BRI.