Epidemiological studies have established positive associations of urban nature with cognitive development and mental health. However, why specifically these health benefits are received remains unclear, especially in adolescents. We used longitudinal data in a cohort of 3,568 adolescents aged 9 to 15 years at 31 schools across London, UK, to examine the associations between natural-environment types and adolescents’ cognitive development, mental health and overall well-being. We characterized natural-environment types in three tiers, where natural space was distinguished into green and blue space, and green space was further distinguished into woodland and grassland. We showed that, after adjusting for other confounding variables, higher daily exposure to woodland, but not grassland, was associated with higher scores for cognitive development and a lower risk of emotional and behavioural problems for adolescents. A similar but smaller effect was seen for green space, but not blue space, with higher scores for cognitive development. Our results suggest that urban planning decisions to optimize ecosystem benefits linked to cognitive development and mental health should carefully consider the type of natural environment included.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Study population and environmental exposure data around each adolescent’s residence and school are not publicly available for data protection issues. To request access to the data, contact M.B.T. Environmental data at the basis of our environmental exposure data are available at github.com/MikaelMaes/HumanExposure.git. The environmental data are based on publicly available sources. Sentinel-2 satellite data are available using Google Earth Engine at earthengine.google.com. Buildings, surface-water and tidal-water layers from the OS Open Map are available at ordnancesurvey.co.uk. LiDAR data from the Environment Agency are available at data.gov.uk. Air pollution estimates using the LAEI 2016 from GLA and Transport for London are available at data.london.gov.uk. The full model outputs that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Information.
Giles-Corti, B. et al. City planning and population health: a global challenge. Lancet 388, 2912–2924 (2016).
World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision ST/ESA/SER.A/420 (UN DESA, 2019).
Okkels, N., Kristiansen, C. B., Munk-Jørgensen, P. & Sartorius, N. Urban mental health. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 31, 258–264 (2018).
Robbins, R. N., Scott, T., Joska, J. A. & Gouse, H. Impact of urbanization on cognitive disorders. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 32, 210–217 (2019).
Sarkar, C., Webster, C. & Gallacher, J. Residential greenness and prevalence of major depressive disorders: a cross-sectional, observational, associational study of 94 879 adult UK Biobank participants. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e162–e173 (2018).
Engemann, K. et al. Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1807504116 (2019).
Dadvand, P. et al. Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7937–7942 (2015).
Franco, L. S., Shanahan, D. F. & Fuller, R. A. A review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 864 (2017).
Cox, D. T. C. et al. Skewed contributions of individual trees to indirect nature experiences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 185, 28–34 (2019).
Irvine, K. N. et al. Green space, soundscape and urban sustainability: an interdisciplinary, empirical study. Local Environ. 14, 155–172 (2009).
Weber, S. T. & Heuberger, E. The impact of natural odors on affective states in humans. Chem. Senses 33, 441–447 (2008).
Li, Q. Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 15, 9–17 (2010).
Rook, G. A., Raison, C. L. & Lowry, C. A. Can we vaccinate against depression? Drug Discov. Today 17, 451–458 (2012).
Markevych, I. et al. Access to urban green spaces and behavioural problems in children: results from the GINIplus and LISAplus studies. Environ. Int. 71, 29–35 (2014).
Taylor, M. S., Wheeler, B. W., White, M. P., Economou, T. & Osborne, N. J. Research note: urban street tree density and antidepressant prescription rates—a cross-sectional study in London, UK. Landsc. Urban Plan. 136, 174–179 (2015).
Akpinar, A., Barbosa-Leiker, C. & Brooks, K. R. Does green space matter? Exploring relationships between green space type and health indicators. Urban For. Urban Green. 20, 407–418 (2016).
Cox, D. T. C., Shanahan, D. F., Hudson, H. L., Fuller, R. A. & Gaston, K. J. The impact of urbanisation on nature dose and the implications for human health. Landsc. Urban Plan. 179, 72–80 (2018).
Amoly, E. et al. Green and blue spaces and behavioral development in Barcelona schoolchildren: the BREATHE Project. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 1351–1358 (2014).
Astell-Burt, T. & Feng, X. Association of urban green space with mental health and general health among adults in Australia. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e198209 (2019).
Barton, J. & Pretty, J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 3947–3955 (2010).
Gascon, M. et al. Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 4354–4379 (2015).
The Mental Health of Children and Young People in London (PHE, 2016).
Bijnens, E. M., Derom, C., Thiery, E., Weyers, S. & Nawrot, T. S. Residential green space and child intelligence and behavior across urban, suburban, and rural areas in Belgium: a longitudinal birth cohort study of twins. PLoS Med. 17, e1003213 (2020).
Milligan, C. & Bingley, A. Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health Place 13, 799–811 (2007).
Toledano, M. B. et al. Cohort profile: the study of cognition, adolescents and mobile phones (SCAMP). Int. J. Epidemiol. 48, 25–26l (2018).
Afifi, M. Gender differences in mental health. Singapore Med. J. 48, 385–391 (2007).
Guhn, M., Emerson, S. D., Mahdaviani, D. & Gadermann, A. M. Associations of birth factors and socio-economic status with indicators of early emotional development and mental health in childhood: a population-based linkage study. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 51, 80–93 (2020).
Morita, E. et al. Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing, walking) as a possible method of stress reduction. Public Health 121, 54–63 (2007).
Thompson, C. W. et al. Health impacts of environmental and social interventions designed to increase deprived communities’ access to urban woodlands: a mixed-methods study. Public Health Res. 27, 1–172 (2019).
Hedblom, M., Heyman, E., Antonsson, H. & Gunnarsson, B. Bird song diversity influences young people’s appreciation of urban landscapes. Urban For. Urban Green. 13, 469–474 (2014).
Liao, J. et al. Residential exposure to green space and early childhood neurodevelopment. Environ. Int. 128, 70–76 (2019).
Picavet, H. S. J. et al. Greener living environment healthier people? Exploring green space, physical activity and health in the Doetinchem Cohort Study. Prev. Med. 89, 7–14 (2016).
Francis, J., Wood, L. J., Knuiman, M. & Giles-Corti, B. Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between public open space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Soc. Sci. Med. 74, 1570–1577 (2012).
Nutsford, D., Pearson, A. L., Kingham, S. & Reitsma, F. Residential exposure to visible blue space (but not green space) associated with lower psychological distress in a capital city. Health Place 39, 70–78 (2016).
Little, S. & Derr, V. in Research Handbook on Childhoodnature (eds Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. et al.) 151–178 (Springer, 2020).
Bell, S. L., Phoenix, C., Lovell, R. & Wheeler, B. W. Seeking everyday wellbeing: the coast as a therapeutic landscape. Soc. Sci. Med. 142, 56–67 (2015).
Bratman, G. N. et al. Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Sci. Adv. 5, 903–927 (2019).
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S. & Frumkin, H. Nature and health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 35, 207–228 (2014).
Tarling, R. & Roger, R. D. Socio-economic determinants of crime rates: modelling local area police-recorded crime. Howard J. Crime Justice 55, 207–225 (2016).
Rose, D., Pevalin, D. J. & O’Reilly, K. The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: Origins, Development and Use (Palgrave MacMillan, 2005).
Carstairs, V. & Morris, R. Deprivation and health in Scotland. Health Bull. 48, 162–175 (1990).
2011 Census Aggregate Data (Office of National Statistics, 2012); https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census
Luciana, M. & Nelson, C. A. Assessment of neuropsychological function through use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery: performance in 4- to 12-year-old children. Dev. Neuropsychol. 22, 595–624 (2002).
Tombaugh, T. N. Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 19, 203–214 (2004).
Wechsler, D. The Measurement of Adult Intelligence (Williams & Wilkins, 1944).
Burgess, P. W. in Methodology of Frontal and Executive Function (ed. Rabbitt, P.) 79–113 (Taylor and Francis, 2004).
Goodman, R., Meltzer, H. & Bailey, V. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 15, 173–177 (2003).
Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334 (1951).
The KIDSCREEN Group Europe The Kidscreen Questionnaires: Quality of Life Questionnaires for Children and Adolescents (Pabst Science, 2006).
Berman, A. H., Liu, B., Ullman, S., Jadbäck, I. & Engström, K. Children’s quality of life based on the KIDSCREEN-27: child self-report, parent ratings and child–parent agreement in a Swedish random population sample. PLoS ONE 11, e0150545 (2016).
Sentinel-2 User Handbook (ESA, 2015).
Gascon, M. et al. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) as a marker of surrounding greenness in epidemiological studies: the case of Barcelona city. Urban For. Urban Green. 19, 88–94 (2016).
Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).
Open Map—Local (Ordnance Survey, 2019); http://os.uk
Miura, N. & Jones, S. D. Characterizing forest ecological structure using pulse types and heights of airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 1069–1076 (2010).
Dadvand, P. et al. The association between greenness and traffic-related air pollution at schools. Sci. Total Environ. 523, 59–63 (2015).
Sunyer, J. et al. Association between traffic-related air pollution in schools and cognitive development in primary school children: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 12, e1001792 (2015).
Roberts, S. et al. Exploration of NO2 and PM2.5 air pollution and mental health problems using high-resolution data in London-based children from a UK longitudinal cohort study. Psychiatry Res. 272, 8–17 (2019).
Tzivian, L. et al. Effect of long-term outdoor air pollution and noise on cognitive and psychological functions in adults. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 218, 1–11 (2015).
Rue, H., Martino, S. & Chopin, N. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 71, 319–392 (2009).
We thank M. Blangiardo (Imperial College London) and R. Gibb (University College London) for feedback on the statistical analyses. This study is supported by funding of the London Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training Program (NE/L002485/1, M.J.A.M), the MRC Centre for Environment and Health (MR/L01341X/1, M.B.T.) based at Imperial College London and the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in the Health Impact of Environmental Hazards, based at King’s College London and Imperial College London, in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) (HPRU-2012-10141, M.B.T.). SCAMP is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Program (PRP) (Secondary School Cohort Study of Mobile Phone Use and Neurocognitive and Behavioural Outcomes/091/0212) via the Research Initiative on Health and Mobile Telecommunications, a partnership between public funders and the mobile phone industry. An extension to SCAMP is funded by NIHR PRP. The funders of the study had no role in the design or conduct of the study or the reporting of the SCAMP study results. M.B.T. chair and the work in this paper are supported in part by a donation from Marit Mohn to Imperial College London to support Population Child Health. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, DHSC, PHE or any other funder.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review Information Nature Sustainability thanks Esmée Bijnens, Patrick Kinney and Margarita Triguero-Mas for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Maes, M.J.A., Pirani, M., Booth, E.R. et al. Benefit of woodland and other natural environments for adolescents’ cognition and mental health. Nat Sustain 4, 851–858 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00751-1