Article | Open | Published:

Multi-faceted computational assessment of risk and progression in oligodendroglioma implicates NOTCH and PI3K pathways

Abstract

Oligodendrogliomas are diffusely infiltrative gliomas defined by IDH-mutation and co-deletion of 1p/19q. They have highly variable clinical courses, with survivals ranging from 6 months to over 20 years, but little is known regarding the pathways involved with their progression or optimal markers for stratifying risk. We utilized machine-learning approaches with genomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to objectively identify molecular factors associated with clinical outcomes of oligodendroglioma and extended these findings to study signaling pathways implicated in oncogenesis and clinical endpoints associated with glioma progression. Our multi-faceted computational approach uncovered key genetic alterations associated with disease progression and shorter survival in oligodendroglioma and specifically identified Notch pathway inactivation and PI3K pathway activation as the most strongly associated with MRI and pathology findings of advanced disease and poor clinical outcome. Our findings that Notch pathway inactivation and PI3K pathway activation are associated with advanced disease and survival risk will pave the way for clinically relevant markers of disease progression and therapeutic targets to improve clinical outcomes. Furthermore, our approach demonstrates the strength of machine learning and computational methods for identifying genetic events critical to disease progression in the era of big data and precision medicine.

Introduction

Oligodendrogliomas are diffuse gliomas characterized by IDH-mutation, co-deletion of 1p/19q and TERT promoter mutations. They have the least aggressive clinical course among this group, yet display widely variable outcomes—some patients survive 6 months while others live over 20 years.1,2,3,4,5 Aside from their defining genetic alterations, oligodendrogliomas also harbor other mutations, including: capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC) (62%), far upstream element binding protein 1 (FUBP1) (27–29%), NOTCH1 (18–31%), catalytic and regulatory subunits of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K; PIK3CA (15–20%) and PIK3R1 (7–9%), respectively), and others.1,6,7 Now that lower-grade gliomas are understood in objective, molecular terms, markers of progression and targets of therapy are being evaluated in a pure cohort, without the confounding contamination of dissimilar tumor types. Recent investigations by Aoki et al.8 for example, indicated that NOTCH1 mutations were associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with oligodendroglioma.

With the tremendous expansion of genomic data available for both investigation and potential clinical care, a need has developed for novel computational approaches to investigate risk factors in a highly multidimensional and interdependent space.9 Machine-learning approaches are capable of using large genomic datasets in a manner that adds value to traditional risk modeling by identifying key prognostic factors among tens of thousands of possible variables. We employed machine-learning to identify molecular factors associated with clinical outcomes of oligodendroglioma using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LGG dataset. We advanced and translated these findings using neuroimaging and pathology imaging features of progression to identify molecular biomarkers most closely related to advanced disease status, as defined by: (1) contrast-enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (2) high cellular density in digitized histopathologic images; and (3) increased cellular proliferation.10,11,12 In addition, our approach enabled us to identify key signaling pathways associated with more aggressive disease in addition to individual biomarkers. Our approach confirmed the association of NOTCH1 mutations with disease progression and shorter survival in oligodendroglioma, and further uncovered aberrant regulation of Notch and PI3K pathways as most strongly associated with advanced disease.

Results

Patient and tumor characteristics

The clinical factors from the 169 oligodendroglioma patients included in our study are presented in Table 1. TERT promoter mutations were present in 98% (86 of 88).13

Table 1 Patient demographics

Neural network analyses identifies molecular factors associated with outcomes

Analysis of the genetic-protein neural network model revealed multiple mutations, CNAs, and proteins associated with overall survival in oligodendrogliomas (see Fig. 1a). NOTCH1 (rank #5), BCOR (rank #4), and ZBTB20 (rank #1) mutations were among the most highly ranked factors associated with poor prognosis, along with loss of 15q (rank #3). Both NOTCH1 mutations and 15q loss occur in a substantial subset of oligodendrogliomas and have previously been suggested as markers of poor prognosis in traditional risk models,14 providing support for our model. The complete list of ranked factors is in the Supplementary Materials (Data file S1). Among these factors, we focused on the Notch pathway since NOTCH1 mutations are relatively specific to oligodendroglioma among diffuse gliomas; occur in a substantial subset (18–31%) compared to BCOR and ZBTB20; and represent one component of the Notch signaling network that could be more generally relevant to disease progression. PI3K pathway subunit mutations were also of interest since they were heavily enriched among highly ranked negative prognostic factors (PIK3R1, #30; PIK3CA, #193).

Fig. 1
figure1

a Neural network risk factors. A nonlinear Cox proportional hazards model was trained using a neural network to model survival in oligodendrogliomas using clinical, genetic and proteomic factors. Prognostic significance of each feature was assessed by determining how its changes impact prognosis. Positive scores indicate a negative impact on survival (red) while negative scores (blue) suggest a positive impact. The boxplot contains the top 10 factors ranked by median prognostic importance; complete results in Datafile S1. b Gene set enrichment analysis of Notch pathway members. A separate model based on mRNA expression weighed the prognostic significance of individual transcripts and used this data in a gene-set-enrichment analysis to identify pathways associated with prognosis. The canonical Notch pathway was highly enriched with significantly negatively scored transcripts (i.e., darker blue signifies negative scores). Increased expression of downstream targets, including HES1, HES5, and HEY1, were associated with improved prognosis. This model demonstrates Notch signaling inactivation is associated with poor prognosis

Similar analysis of the gene expression neural network model was performed to determine the prognostic importance of mRNA transcripts, and a gene-set-enrichment analysis (GSEA) was then used to identify molecular pathways enriched with prognostic transcripts. GSEA identified the NOTCH1 Intracellular Domain Regulates Transcription pathway (P = 0.004) as highly enriched in transcripts associated with better prognosis, suggesting that Notch pathway inactivation is associated with poor outcomes (Fig. 1b). Regulation of KIT Signaling was also significantly enriched with positive prognosis transcripts (P = 0.002). The P38 / MKK3 (P < 0.05) and SMAD2 / SMAD3 pathways (P = 0.002) were also significantly enriched in transcripts associated with a poor prognosis, and notably, both interface directly with the PI3K pathway.15,16

The results of Monte-Carlo cross validation of the genetic-protein and gene expression survival neural networks are presented in Supplementary Figure S1. The median c-index of the tested genetic-protein models was 0.8 (±0.124), while the median c-index of the tested gene expression models was 0.752 (±0.196).

Radiographic and pathologic features are associated with aggressive clinical behavior

We next focused on mutations and CNAs with a > 5% incidence to assess their association with radiographic and pathologic measures of disease progression, including: mutations of CIC (ranked #107; 61.5% incidence) NOTCH1 (ranked #5; 18.9%), FUBP1 (ranked #20; 27.2%), both PIK3 subunits (PIK3R1 ranked #30 and PIK3CA ranked #193; 23.1%), and CNA’s including gain of chromosomal arms 7p (ranked #300; 8.9%) and 11p (ranked #153; 11.2%), as well as loss of 14q (ranked #310; 11.8%) and 15q (ranked #3; 16.6%) (Fig. S2 illustrates a waterfall plot of the most frequent genetic alterations; Table S1).

Contrast-enhancement observed on MRI is a well-known marker of higher-grade disease (Fig. 2a). Among 55 patients with MRI images available, contrast-enhancing (CE+) tumors (n = 35) had worse overall survival (OS) (median, 154.3 vs. 62.0 months; P = 0.10) and progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 97.3 vs. 63.8 months; P= 0.029) compared to those lacking enhancement (CE−) (n = 20) (Figs. 2b, c). CE+ was highly enriched for histologic grade III tumors; 24 of 25 grade III tumors were CE+ (P< 0.0001).

Fig. 2
figure2

Markers of disease progression in oligodendroglioma a T1-weighted axial MR images with gadolinium contrast demonstrating CE− (left) and CE+ (right) features of oligodendroglioma from The Cancer Imaging Archive. b Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival (OS) for CE- vs. CE + . c Progression-free survival (PFS) for CE− vs. CE+. d Visual representation of a tumor heatmap showing regions of interest of cell density, with a schematic diagram of the nearest-neighbor algorithm. e OS for cellular density (less vs. more dense). f PFS for less vs. more dense. g. High Ki-67 proliferation index visualized with IHC. h Linear regression of MKI67 expression and Ki-67 proliferation index approximated by IHC. i OS for high vs. low MKI67. j PFS for high vs. low MKI67. P values for survival plots determined using log-rank tests

Since cell density increases with disease progression, we used a computational nearest-neighbor analysis to quantify cellular density in tissue sections from 142 cases (Fig. 2d). Higher cell density trended towards worse OS (mean 152.8 vs. 126.1 months; P = 0.076) and worse PFS (median 142.8 vs. 95.9 months; P = 0.14) (Figs. 2e, f). High cell density cases were also enriched for histologic grade III tumors; 44 of 58 high density tumors were WHO grade III (P< 0.0001).

As a measure of proliferation, MKI67 mRNA expression was analyzed for 169 tumors. MKI67 expression was strongly correlated with Ki-67/MIB-1 proliferation indices based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and listed in TCGA pathology reports (P < 0.0001) (Figs. 2g, h). Patients with high cellular proliferation (n = 31) had worse OS (median 154.3 vs. 62.0 months; P = 0.001); no significant difference was noted in PFS (P = 0.38) (Figs. 2i, j). Highly proliferative tumors were also enriched for histologic grade III tumors; 21 of 28 high proliferation tumors with grade information available were WHO grade III (P= 0.001).

Genetic alterations associated with radiographic contrast enhancement, cellular density, and MKI67 expression

Among 55 patients with MR imaging (Table S2), NOTCH1 mutations were most strongly associated with CE+ tumors, with 13 of 14 NOTCH1 mutants being CE+ (P = 0.008) (Fig. 3a). The combined PI3K group mutants were mostly CE+ (14 of 18; P = 0.054), and a similar trend was found among FUBP1 mutants (14 of 17; P = 0.13). All 9 tumors with 11p gain were CE+ (P = 0.019). Although 5 of 5 tumors demonstrating loss of 14q were CE+, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.15). Similar trends were found with 15q loss (9 of 10 CE+; P = 0.075) and 7p gain (6 of 6 CE+; P = 0.076).

Fig. 3
figure3

Genetic alterations associated with advanced disease progression a Waterfall plot illustrating the mutational landscape of oligodendrogliomas based on radiographic features of progression. b Boxplots demonstrating nearest-neighbor validation, and differential 1/nearest-neighbor distances in key genetic alterations of oligodendroglioma. c Boxplots for differential MKI67 expression in key genetic alterations of oligodendroglioma. P values determined using Wilcoxon rank sum tests

NOTCH1 mutant oligodendrogliomas (n = 26) had higher cellular density than NOTCH1 wild-type tumors (n = 126) and this difference was the most significant among all mutations and CNAs (P= 0.0015) (Fig. 3b). FUBP1 mutants (n = 40) trended toward a higher cellular density compared to wild-type (n = 102; P= 0.10), and CIC (n = 88) and PIK3 (n = 33) mutants did not show increased cell density (Fig. S3). Gains of 7p (n = 12) or 11p (n = 17) were significantly associated with higher cell densities (P= 0.006 and 0.03, respectively), and loss of 15q (n = 21) trended towards higher cellular density as well (P= 0.19) (Fig. 3b).

NOTCH1 mutants (n = 32) had higher MKI67 expression and this association was the strongest among all mutations and CNAs tested (P= 0.095) (Fig. 3c). FUBP1, CIC, and PIK3 mutations were not strongly related to MKI67 expression (Fig. S4). Although gain of 7p and 11p, and loss of 14q and 15q trended towards higher cellular proliferation, none reached statistical significance.

Inactivation of the canonical Notch pathway is associated with disease progression measures

Since NOTCH1 mutations were consistently and strongly associated with radiologic, pathologic, and molecular measures of progression, we investigated downstream targets of the canonical Notch pathway, including family members of hairy/enhancer of split 1 (HES) and hairy/enhancer of split with YRPW motif (HEY). Since nearly all (93%) NOTCH1 mutations were located within the epidermal growth factor (EGF) like region, where they inhibit Notch activation, we hypothesized these targets would be down regulated in NOTCH1 mutants.17,18 Expression of HES1, HEY1, and HEY2 was reduced in CE+ tumors, with HES1 and HEY2 reaching statistical significance (P= 0.016 and 0.050, respectively) (Fig. 4a and Fig. S5). HEY2 (Pearson correlation = 0.230, P= 0.006) was positively correlated with nearest-neighbor distance (Fig. 4b) and negatively correlated with cellular proliferation as approximated by MKI67 expression (Pearson correlation = −0.353, P< 0.0001) (Fig. 4c). Negative correlations between MKI67 expression and HES1 (Pearson correlation = −0.152, P= 0.048) and HEY1 (Pearson correlation = −0.082, P= 0.288) were also observed. Thus, among HES and HEY family members, HES1, HEY1 and HEY2 showed reduced expression with advanced disease, with HEY2 showing the most consistent and statistically significant reductions.

Fig. 4
figure4

HEY2 associations with advanced disease and validation cohort. a Boxplots demonstrating differential HEY2 gene expression in CE− and CE+; P value determined using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. b Linear regression of HEY2 gene expression and nearest-neighbor distance, demonstrating positive correlation. c Linear regression of HEY2 and MKI67 expression, demonstrating negative correlation. P values from Pearson correlation. d IHC showing high Ki-67 proliferation index (25%) (bar, 250 μm), with corresponding absent HEY2 expression (bar, 100 μm) and high pAkt expression (bar 100 μm). e IHC showing low Ki-67 proliferation index (1%) (bar, 250 μm), with corresponding high HEY2 expression (bar, 100 μm) and absent pAkt expression (bar, 100 μm). f HEY2 and pAKT IHC intensity as related to cellular density and Ki-67 proliferation indices

Alternate mechanisms of Notch pathway inactivation in oligodendroglioma

Recombinant signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa-J region (RBPJ), the nuclear binding partner of activated NOTCH1’s intracellular binding domain (NICD), was mutated (n = 5) or homodeleted (n = 1) in 3% (6 of 169) of oligodendrogliomas. RBPJ aberrations were mutually exclusive with NOTCH1 mutations and were not present in IDH mutant or IDH wild-type astrocytomas. RBPJ altered tumors had greater MKI67 expression compared to wild-type (P= 0.001) and showed a trend toward higher cell density (P= 0.20), but were not enriched in CE + tumors (Fig. S6A). When RBPJ and NOTCH1 mutant tumors were grouped (n = 38), MKI67 expression and 1/nearest-neighbor distance showed stronger statistical significance in the combined group than in the group with NOTCH1 mutants alone (P= 0.0030 and 0.00039 for combined groups, respectively vs. P = 0.095 and 0.002 for NOTCH1 mutants alone) (Fig. S6B). Thus, RBPJ mutation likely represents an alternative mechanism for Notch pathway inactivation in oligodendroglioma.

Survival analysis reveals PIK3 mutations and reduced Notch target expression are associated with worse prognosis

A comprehensive analysis of clinical and genetic factors associated with survival was performed using a Cox proportional hazards models (Table 2 and Table S3). Univariable analysis revealed age and grade as strong predictors of poor OS (Hazards ratio (HR) 3.64 per 10 years, P< 0.0001; HR 6.61, P = 0.013, respectively). After adjusting for age and grade, the combination of PIK3 mutations were found to confer poor prognosis (HR 3.11, P = 0.045). Among the downstream Notch target genes, increased HES5 expression had a significant protective effect (HR 0.74, P= 0.024) after accounting for age and grade.

Table 2 Survival tables

Univariable analysis of PFS uncovered increased risk with grade III relative to grade II (HR 2.24, P = 0.046). PIK3 (HR 1.98, P = 0.092) mutations trended toward increased risk of progression after accounting for tumor grade. Loss of 14q (HR 3.90 P= 0.0035) predicted more rapid time to progression after adjusting for grade. While NOTCH1 mutants were not individually predictive of PFS, when combined with RBPJ altered tumors, the combined mutants predicted shorter time to first progression (HR 2.47, P= 0.021). After adjusting for grade, reduced HEY1 (HR 0.48, P= 0.018) expression had a negative impact on PFS, while HES5 trended in this direction (HR 0.86, P= 0.120). Complete survival analysis results in Table S3 and Fig. S7-S8.

Translation and validation in clinical cases

We investigated 51 newly diagnosed cases of oligodendroglioma, grades II and III, from hospital archives. Pre-operative imaging was available for 47. We focused our IHC analysis on HEY2, since its gene expression showed greatest reduction in NOTCH1 mutants, and pAkt, a downstream marker of PI3K activation (Figs. 4d, e).

Thirty-two tumors were WHO grade II and 19 were grade III; 21 tumors were CE− and 26 were CE+. By IHC analysis of HEY2, 20 tumors showed low expression and 31 showed high expression. Fourteen of 19 (73.7%) tumors with low HEY2 were CE+. Tumors with low HEY2 also had greater cell density (P = 0.014) and were more proliferative (P = 0.0096) than those with increased HEY2 staining (Fig. 4f). IHC investigation of pAkt found 27 tumors had low expression; 22 showed high expression; 15 of 20 (75%) tumors with pre-operative imaging and high pAkt expression were CE+. Tumors with high pAkt expression had greater cell density and were more proliferative (P< 0.0001, for both) (Fig. 4f).

Discussion

We used a multi-faceted, technologically advanced, computational approach to identify molecular events associated with aggressive disease within molecularly defined oligodendroglioma (IDH mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted) and uncovered Notch pathway inactivation and PI3K activation as critical events. Our deep learning neural network methods analyzed multiplatform TCGA molecular data to generate protein-genetic and gene expression models of overall survival, and provided an objective ranking of clinical and molecular risk factors. In concordance with recent investigations,8 NOTCH1 mutations were identified as one of the most highly weighted risk factors in our deep learning prognostic model, and was the genetic event most associated with disease progression in each endpoint assessed (MRI contrast-enhancement, cell density, and cellular proliferation). Therefore, inactivating point mutations of NOTCH1 are one of the most clinically meaningful alterations in oligodendroglioma progression and might suggest that inactivation of the Notch pathway is more generally responsible for poor clinical outcomes.

The NOTCH family is an evolutionarily conserved set of transmembrane receptors that regulate numerous critical biological functions. Notch pathway is activated by extracellular ligand binding, followed by γ-secretase cleavage to release an active intracellular domain (NICD), which localizes to the nucleus and binds to its partner RBPJ to initiate transcription of downstream targets, including HES and HEY family members.19,20 Both activating and inactivating NOTCH1 mutations have been described in cancer, including in oligodendroglioma.8,20,21,22,23 Inactivating mutations, such as those noted in oligodendroglioma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, are enriched within EGF-like regions and interfere with ligand-mediated pathway activation.1,17,20,22,24,25,26

Our results suggest inactivation of Notch signaling may be more relevant to oligodendroglioma progression than NOTCH1 mutations alone. For example, reduced expression of Notch targets, namely HES1, HEY1, and especially HEY2, was seen in clinically progressed oligodendroglioma, while HES5 expression was most associated with shorter survival on multivariable analysis. HEY2 showed a strong positive correlation with cellular density and proliferation, beyond those of NOTCH1 mutations alone, suggesting other Notch pathway members might be inactivated and lead to reduced downstream target activation.

Furthermore, we found mutations and deletions of RBPJ, the nuclear binding partner of NOTCH1 and a member of the canonical Notch pathway, are linked to advanced disease, providing additional evidence that Notch pathway inactivation may be a general progression mechanism. RBPJ normally recruits corepressor proteins and suppresses transcription of downstream targets, whereas active NOTCH1 binds RBPJ and initiates transcription.27 Genetic aberrations of RBPJ likely prevent active NOTCH1 from binding to the transcriptional complex. However, Notch-independent functions of RBPJ have also been described.27 RBPJ was mutated in 3% of our cohort and homozygously deleted in another case, which is relatively low, but consistent with other forms of cancer.18,28 Importantly, RBPJ alterations were mutually exclusive from NOTCH1 mutations, showed strong trends of association with features of disease progression, and had reduced downstream target expression when considered independently. When cases with either NOTCH1 mutations or RBPJ alterations were considered together, the combined group was more strongly associated with disease progression and pathway inactivation than either one alone, and was strongly associated with worse PFS, again raising the possibility that Notch pathway inactivation by multiple mechanisms may be associated with oligodendroglioma progression.

Other prognostically-significant chromosomal aberrations associated with disease progression uncovered by our analysis, including losses of 14q and 15q and gains of 7p, also harbor Notch pathway members, and may be mechanistically relevant to pathway inactivation and disease progression, but will require further investigation. Chromosome 14q contains genes that encode presenilin-1 (PSEN1), a component of the γ-secretase that activates Notch; NUMB, a Notch inhibitor; and jagged-2 (JAG2), a NOTCH receptor ligand. 15q, whose loss was nearly mutually exclusive with NOTCH1 and RBPJ aberrations, contains genes coding for Delta-like 4 (DLL4), a NOTCH ligand; a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10 (ADAM10), a controller of NOTCH cleavage; and APH1B, a γ-secretase of NOTCH.29 Chromosome 7 contains the gene encoding lunatic fringe (LFNG), a key Notch signaling repressor, such that its overexpression could suppress Notch signaling.29 The identification of RBPJ mutations as a Notch pathway member associated with a poor prognosis, our link between gene expression of Notch pathway members to patient outcome, and the finding of downstream effectors of the Notch pathway, such as Hes and Hey family members, being downregulated in progressed oligodendrogliomas collectively point in the direction of uncovering other inactivating Notch family members, likely within amplified or deleted loci and providing a platform for assessing Notch pathway for predicting clinical behavior.

Mutations of PIK3 subunits were highly weighted negative prognostic markers in our neural network analysis; were enriched in a subset of our endpoints of advanced disease; and were markers of shorter survival on multivariable analysis. Mutations of PIK3CA are activating, while those of PIK3R are inactivating, and both result in enhanced PI3K activity, with downstream activation of Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin, which are associated with aggressive clinical behavior in many cancers.30 Our neural network identified INPP4B, a known suppressor of PI3K signaling,31 as a protein whose increased expression was strongly associated with improved outcome. The PI3K pathway also strongly converges with SMAD2/3 and P38/MKK3 pathways, which were identified as among the most enriched with negative prognostic transcripts in our neural network.15,16 Lastly, our IHC analysis indicated pAkt expression was associated with higher-grade features and may have utility as a prognostic marker.

Importantly, our identification of Notch and PI3K pathways’ association with survival risk and disease progression does not demonstrate a causal or temporal relationship, and represents an inherent limitation of our study. The use of a machine-learning method does not resolve the issues of feature covariance that also limit the interpretation of models generated by more conventional approaches. We cannot prove NOTCH1 or PIK3 subunit mutations evolved temporally from a lower grade tumor, causing its progression. It is entirely possible oligodendrogliomas with Notch inactivation and PI3K activation are in fact distinct genetic subsets at their initiation and these tumors are more rapidly progressive. Longitudinal investigation of patient cohorts with primary and recurrent tumors is needed to identify temporal evolution.32,33 Future investigation will also require the elucidation of downstream targets of Notch and PI3K pathways that may drive glioma progression.

Methods

Study design

We used clinical and genomic data from the Open Access Data Tier of the TCGA LGG dataset for 169 oligodendroglioma (IDH mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted) (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/; last accessed September 7th, 2016). Clinical variables consisted of age, gender, extent of resection, overall survival time, survival status, progression-free survival time, and progression status; tumor characteristics included location and histologic grade based on the 2007 WHO brain tumor classification.13

Deep learning survival model

We trained a Cox proportional hazards deep learning neural networks to model OS.34 Two models were constructed: (1) a genetic-protein model based on clinical factors (radiation therapy, histologic grade), age, gender, mutations, focal and arm-level copy number events (CNAs), and reverse phase protein array profiles, and 2) a transcriptional model based on mRNA sequencing factors alone. Mutations and CNAs were filtered using MutSig P-value threshold of 0.1, and Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer (GISTIC) P-value threshold of 0.25.35,36 The prognostic significance of each feature was assessed using mathematical derivatives to evaluate the sensitivity of risk to changes in feature values. Prognostic significance weights in the mRNA model were further used to perform pathway analysis to identify pathways enriched with either good or poor prognosis transcripts. Pathway analysis was performed with GSEA using the Canonical Pathways gene set from the MSigDB curated gene sets.

The accuracy of these modeling approaches in the oligodendroglioma cohort was evaluated using Monte-Carlo cross validation. We first randomly assigned 80% of samples to a training set, and the remaining 20% of samples to a testing set. A predictive model was trained using the training sample, and the accuracy of this model was evaluated using Harrell’s concordance-index (c-index) on the testing samples. This process was repeated for 20 randomized partitions of the dataset. For the genetic-proteomic model, a three layer network consisting of 100 neurons per layer was used. For the transcriptional model, a three layer network consisting of 500 neurons per layer was used. In both cases, these models were trained for 25 epochs using RMSprop optimization with a learning rate of 1e-3 and a dropout rate of 10%. Further details of this modeling approach are available in our previous work.34

Clinical data was obtained from the TCGA data portal (last accessed 22 January 2016). OS was defined as months from initial diagnosis to death. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; log-rank tests were used to compare curves between groups. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as months from initial diagnosis to disease progression or death. PFS curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method; log-rank tests were used to compare curves between groups. Single and multi-variable models (non machine-learning) were also fit using Cox regression under the proportional hazards assumption for OS and PFS.

Genomic data

Gene expression, mutation, and CNA data were obtained from the TCGA portal (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov). Genetic alterations with at least 5% frequency were included in the analysis (Table S1A). Variants were considered as mutants if there was an amino acid change and genes were filtered using q ≤ 0.05 in MutSig analysis. Mutations were then converted into dichotomous variables (mutation and wild-type). Arm level copy number data was obtained from GDAC GISTIC hosted analysis results (https://gdac.broadinstitute.org/). Values of chromosomal arm gain or loss were listed as a fraction of the chromosomal arm, where gains were positive values and losses were negative values. A threshold absolute value of 0.10 of the fraction of the chromosomal arm was used to signify chromosomal gain or loss. Frequency of chromosomal gains and losses are summarized in Table S1B.

Radiographic imaging review

Preoperative MR imaging studies for TCGA patients were obtained from TCIA (http://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/; last accessed 8 February 2016) for 55 untreated patients. Institutional neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons reviewed MR images for the presence of unequivocal contrast-enhancement.

Quantification of cellular density and nearest-neighbor analysis

Whole-slide digital pathology images (n = 142) were obtained from the CDSA (http://cancer.digitalslidearchive.net/; last accessed 11 August 2016). Images (20×) were analyzed using an image analysis algorithm to identify cell nuclei and to quantify cellular density in areas of tumor infiltration.37 The spacing between neighboring nuclei was calculated using KD-trees, and these distances were modeled using a Poisson point process. The densities of tumor and normal regions were deconvolved using a mixture Poisson model to identify the density parameter in tumor regions, λtumor−1. The median tumor density across patients was used to define “less dense” and “more dense” categories. Cell density was also analyzed visually by a neuropathologist (JV), blinded to nearest neighbor analysis, and scored as: “low”, “intermediate”, or “high”. Algorithm and human assessments of density were highly concordant (Wilcoxon-rank sum < 0.05 level).

Gene expression of MKI67 as a marker for cellular proliferation

A “high” category for MKI67 expression was defined (≥700) to correspond to 15% MIB-1/Ki-67 labeling index using a linear regression model.11 Samples with MKI67 < 700 were designated ‘low’.

Statistics

Associations between contrast-enhancement and mutational status were calculated using the χ2 test for independence; for expected counts less than 5, Fisher’s exact test was used. Statistical associations between 2 groups of continuous or ordinal variables, such as the cellular density calls, were calculated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the linear dependence between continuous variables. All P-values reported are two-sided and regarded as statistically significant if P< 0.05. The software used for statistical analysis and graphical representations include: SPSS v23 (SPSS Statistics, IBM Corp., NY) and R Studio v0.99. All boxplots have the median marked as the center line, and whisker lines indicate the lower and upper quartiles (25 and 75%, respectively).

Validation set

Fifty-one patients with primary oligodendroglioma (IDH mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted) were identified at Emory University Hospital with approval from the institution’s IRB committee and with a waiver of consent (IRB 00088647). MRIs were reviewed by a neuroradiologist (CAH) for contrast enhancement. Histologic slides were reviewed by two neuropathologists (DJB and JV). IHC staining was performed for Ki-67; a proliferation index was calculated using digital image analysis (Aperio Positive Pixel Count). Cell density was calculated by dividing cell count by area in regions of interest (mm2). IHC for Notch signaling was assessed using anti-HEY2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (catalog #AB5716, Millipore, 1:100) and for PI3K using anti-pAkt (S473) rabbit monoclonal antibody (#EP2109Y, Abcam, 1:100). HEY2 and pAkt IHC slides were reviewed and scored based on staining intensity. Selected samples underwent DNA isolation and focused sequencing of the NOTCH1 gene using Sanger sequencing, included the epidermal-growth-factor-like domain (EGF-like) spanning amino acids 300 to 500. Targeted sequencing was performed using a glioma gene panel on the Fluidigm platform.

Data availability

All data used in this investigation is accessible in Supplementary Data File S1.

References

  1. 1.

    Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. et al. Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N. Engl. J. Med 372, 2481–2498 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Parsons, D. W. et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321, 1807–1812 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Yan, H. et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. New Engl. J. Med. 360, 765–773 (2009).

  4. 4.

    Louis, DN, Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, OD, Cavenee, WK. World Health Organization Histological Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. International Agency for Research on Cancer, France (2016).

  5. 5.

    Eckel-Passow, J. E. et al. Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors. New Engl. J. Med. 372, 2499–2508 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Bettegowda, C. et al. Mutations in CIC and FUBP1 contribute to human oligodendroglioma. Science 333, 1453–1455 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Ceccarelli, M. et al. Molecular profiling reveals biologically discrete subsets and pathways of progression in diffuse glioma. Cell 164, 550–563 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Aoki, K. et al. Prognostic relevance of genetic alterations in diffuse lower-grade gliomas. Neuro-Oncology 20, 66–77 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Obermeyer, Z. & Emanuel, E. J. Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. New Engl. J. Med. 375, 1216–1219 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Reyes-Botero, G. et al. Contrast enhancement in 1p/19q-codeleted anaplastic oligodendrogliomas is associated with 9p loss, genomic instability, and angiogenic gene expression. Neuro Oncol. 16, 662–670 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Trembath, D., Miller, C. R. & Perry, A. Gray zones in brain tumor classification: Evolving concepts. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 15, 287–297 (2008).

  12. 12.

    Wesseling, P., van den Bent, M. & Perry, A. Oligodendroglioma: Pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. Acta Neuropathol. 129, 809–827 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O.D., Cavenee, W.K. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 4th edn, Intl. Agency for Research, Lyon (2007).

  14. 14.

    Olar, A. et al. IDH mutation status and role of WHO grade and mitotic index in overall survival in grade II-III diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 129, 585–596 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Singh, A. M. et al. Signaling network crosstalk in human pluripotent cells: A Smad2/3-regulated switch that controls the balance between self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 10, 312–326 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Locatelli, S. L. et al. Dual PI3K/ERK inhibition induces necroptotic cell death of Hodgkin Lymphoma cells through IER3 downregulation. Sci. Rep. 6, 35745 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Wang, N. J. et al. Loss-of-function mutations in Notch receptors in cutaneous and lung squamous cell carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 17761–17766 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Kopan, R. & Ilagan, M. X. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: Unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 137, 216–233 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Yap, L. F. et al. The opposing roles of NOTCH signalling in head and neck cancer: A mini review. Oral Dis. 21, 850–857 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Rampias, T. et al. A new tumor suppressor role for the Notch pathway in bladder cancer. Nat. Med. 20, 1199–1205s (2014).

  22. 22.

    Agrawal, N. et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science 333, 1154–1157 (2011).

  23. 23.

    Radtke, F. & Raj, K. The role of Notch in tumorigenesis: oncogene or tumour suppressor? Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 756–767 (2003).

  24. 24.

    Lawrence, M. S. et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature 505, 495–501 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Stransky, N. et al. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science 333, 1157–1160 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Rebay, I. et al. Specific EGF repeats of Notch mediate interactions with Delta and Serrate: Implications for Notch as a multifunctional receptor. Cell 67, 687–699 (1991).

  27. 27.

    Xie, Q. et al. RBPJ maintains brain tumor-initiating cells through CDK9-mediated transcriptional elongation. RBPJ maintains brain tumor-initiating cells through CDK9-mediated transcriptional elongation 126, 2757–2772 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Kulic, I. et al. Loss of the Notch effector RBPJ promotes tumorigenesis. J. Exp. Med. 212, 37–52 (2015).

  29. 29.

    UniProt: A hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 D158–D169 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Thorpe, L. M., Yuzugullu, H. & Zhao, J. J. PI3K in cancer: Divergent roles of isoforms, modes of activation and therapeutic targeting. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 7–24 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Gewinner, C. et al. Evidence that Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II is a tumor suppressor that inhibits PI3K signaling. Cancer Cell 16, 115–125 (2009).

  32. 32.

    Kim, H. et al. Whole-genome and multisector exome sequencing of primary and post-treatment glioblastoma reveals patterns of tumor evolution. Genome Res. 25, 316–327 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Johnson, B. E. et al. Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma. Science 343, 189–193 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Yousefi, S. et al. Predicting clinical outcomes from large scale cancer genomic profiles with deep survival models. Sci. Rep. 7, 11707 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Beroukhim, R. et al. Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: Methodology and application to glioma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 20007–20012 (2007).

  36. 36.

    Lawrence, M. S. et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499, 214–218 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Cooper, L. A. et al. Novel genotype-phenotype associations in human cancers enabled by advanced molecular platforms and computational analysis of whole slide images. Lab Invest. 95, 366–376 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Tissue Procurement Service and the Research Pathology Laboratory of the Cancer Tissue and Pathology Shared Resource, as well as the Proteomics Shared Resource, at the Winship Cancer Institute, supported by the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA138292). This work was generously supported by the National Brain Tumor Society (NBTS), the loglio research project, and Oligo Nation. The U.S. Public Health Service supported this work through National Institutes of Health grants R01CA176659 (D.J. Brat), U24CA194362 (L.A.D. Cooper), K22LM011576 (L.A.D. Cooper), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health grants UL1TR000454 (S.H. Halani) and TL1TR000456 (S.H. Halani), and the Winship Cancer Institute NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA138292).

Author information

The following authors contributed to: Conception and design of study (S.H.H., S.Y., L.A.D.C., D.J.B.); acquisition of data (S.H.H., S.Y., J.V.V., F.A., A.B.S., Z.Z., T.J., C.G.E., C.A.H., J.E., B.G., J.J.O., L.P., L.A.D.C., D.J.B.); analysis and interpretation of data (S.H.H., S.Y., F.A., L.P., L.A.D.C., D.J.B.); drafting and revising the manuscript (S.H.H., S.Y., J.V.V., F.A., A.B.S., Z.Z., T.J., C.G.E., C.A.H., J.E., B.G., J.J.O., L.P., L.A.D.C., D.J.B.); final approval of the submitted manuscript (S.H.H., S.Y., J.V.V., F.A., A.B.S., Z.Z., T.J., C.G.E., C.A.H., J.E., B.G., J.J.O., L.P., L.A.D.C., D.J.B.).

Correspondence to Lee A. D. Cooper or Daniel J. Brat.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental Figures and tables

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading