For the production and rederivation of mouse strains, pseudopregnant female mice are used for embryo transfer and serve as surrogate mothers to support embryo development to term. Vasectomized males are commonly used to render pseudopregnancy in females, generated by surgical procedures associated with considerable pain and discomfort. Genetically modified mouse strains with a sterility phenotype provide a non-surgical replacement and represent an important application of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement). However, the maintenance of such genetically modified mouse strains requires extensive breeding and genotyping procedures, which are regulated procedures under national legislation. As an alternative, we have explored the use of sterile male hybrids that result when two wild-type mouse subspecies, Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus, interbreed. We find the male STUSB6F1 hybrid, resulting from the mating of female STUS/Fore with male C57BL/6J, ideally suited and demonstrate that its performance for the production of oviduct and uterine transfer recipients is indistinguishable when compared to surgically vasectomized mice. The use of these sterile hybrids avoids the necessity for surgical procedures or the breeding of sterile genetically modified lines and can be generated by the simple mating of two wild-type laboratory strains—a non-regulated procedure. Furthermore, in contrast with the breeding of genetically sterile mice, all male offspring are sterile and suitable for the generation of pseudopregnancy, allowing their efficient production with minimal breeding pairs.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supporting Information files). The STUS/Fore strain is available on request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Behringer, R., Gertsenstein, M., Nagy, K. V. & Nagy, A. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. Edn 4 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, 2014).
Nagy, A., Gertsenstein, M., Vintersten, K. & Behringer, R. Vasectomy for generation of sterile males: access via scrotal sac. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2006, pdb.prot4377 (2006).
Miller, A. L., Wright-Williams, S. L., Flecknell, P. A. & Roughan, J. V. A comparison of abdominal and scrotal approach methods of vasectomy and the influence of analgesic treatment in laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 46, 304–310 (2012).
Garrels, W. et al. Direct comparison of vasectomized males and genetically sterile Gapdhs knockout males for the induction of pseudopregnancy in mice. Lab. Anim. 52, 365–372 (2018).
Haueter, S. et al. Genetic vasectomy-overexpression of Prm1-EGFP fusion protein in elongating spermatids causes dominant male sterility in mice. Genesis 48, 151–160 (2010).
Henikoff, S. Conspiracy of silence among repeated transgenes. Bioessays 20, 532–535 (1998).
Benirschke, K. Sterility and fertility of interspecific mammalian hybrids. In Comparative Aspects of Reproductive Failure: An International Conference at Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, N.H.—July 25–29, 1966 (ed. Benirschke, K.) 218–234 (Springer-Verlag, BerlinGermany, 1967).
Haldane, J. B. S. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12, 101–109 (1922).
Davies, B. et al. Re-engineering the zinc fingers of PRDM9 reverses hybrid sterility in mice. Nature 530, 171–176 (2016).
Pialek, J. et al. Development of unique house mouse resources suitable for evolutionary studies of speciation. J. Hered. 99, 34–44 (2008).
Bhattacharyya, T. et al. X chromosome control of meiotic chromosome synapsis in mouse inter-subspecific hybrids. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004088 (2014).
Lustyk, D. et al. Genomic structure of Hstx2 modifier of Prdm9-dependent hybrid male sterility in mice. Genetics 213, 1047–1063 (2019).
Gregorova, S. & Forejt, J. PWD/Ph and PWK/Ph inbred mouse strains of Mus m. musculus subspecies—a valuable resource of phenotypic variations and genomic polymorphisms. Folia Biol. (Praha) 46, 31–41 (2000).
Flachs, P. et al. Interallelic and intergenic incompatibilities of the Prdm9 (Hst1) gene in mouse hybrid sterility. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003044 (2012).
Widmayer, S. J., Handel, M. A. & Aylor, D. L. Age and genetic background modify hybrid male sterility in house mice. Genetics 216, 585–597 (2020).
Plück, A. & Klasen, C. Surgical techniques for the generation of mutant mice. Methods Mol. Biol. 561, 231–243 (2009).
Troder, S. E. et al. An optimized electroporation approach for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in murine zygotes. PLoS One 13, e0196891 (2018).
Damert, A. & Kusserow, H. Generation of transgenic mice by pronuclear injection. Methods Mol. Med. 89, 513–528 (2003).
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Core Award Grant (203141/Z/16/Z) and a National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research project grant (NC/R001014/1).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Preece, C., Alghadban, S., Bouchareb, A. et al. Replacement of surgical vasectomy through the use of wild-type sterile hybrids. Lab Anim 50, 49–52 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-020-00692-w