Abstract
The mechanical properties of the sclera play a critical role in supporting the ocular structure and maintaining its shape. However, non-invasive measurements to quantify scleral biomechanics remain challenging. Recently introduced multi-directional optical coherence elastography (OCE) combined with an air-coupled ultrasound transducer for excitation of elastic surface waves was used to estimate phase speed and shear modulus in ex vivo rabbit globes (n = 7). The scleral phase speed (12.1 ± 3.2 m/s) was directional-dependent and higher than for corneal tissue (5.9 ± 1.4 m/s). In the tested locations, the sclera proved to be more anisotropic than the cornea by a factor of 11 in the maximum of modified planar anisotropy coefficient. The scleral shear moduli, estimated using a modified Rayleigh-Lamb wave model, showed significantly higher values in the circumferential direction (65.4 ± 31.9 kPa) than in meridional (22.5 ± 7.2 kPa); and in the anterior zone (27.3 ± 9.3 kPa) than in the posterior zone (17.8 ± 7.4 kPa). The multi-directional scanning approach allowed both quantification and radial mapping of estimated parameters within a single measurement. The results indicate that multi-directional OCE provides a valuable non-invasive assessment of scleral tissue properties that may be useful in the development of improved ocular models, the evaluation of potential myopia treatment strategies, and disease characterization and monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The sclera is the fundamental connective tissue, which provides mechanical support to the internal ocular structures (retina, optic nerve head) and, along with the cornea and lens, plays a central role in maintaining the refractive status of the eye1,2,3. Myopia (nearsightedness) results mainly from excessive ocular axial elongation, however, myopia patients may also exhibit a thinner crystalline lens4,5 and morphometry differences in the anterior sclera6,7 compared to emmetropic subjects.
Although the signaling cascade of myopia presumably triggered by hyperopic defocus and resulting in eye growth is not clearly understood, it is fairly well established that it induces mechanical remodeling of the sclera. In particular, several authors have reported structural changes in the scleral extracellular matrix caused by an up-regulation of metalloproteinase activity and a decrease in the rate of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) synthesis8,9, which may precede thinning and loss of the collagen fiber bundles1,10. These microstructural alterations in the sclera lead to biomechanical changes11,12, particularly mechanical weakening of the posterior sclera in myopia 13,14,15,16. Even the healthy sclera is known to show important regional variations in the distribution of proteoglycans and their specific content of GAGs17, as well as in the elastic properties18,19, and in the orientation of the collagen fibers20,21,22,23. Despite previous work on animal models and human sclera, non-contact, non-invasive, and non-destructive measurement of the biomechanical properties of the sclera remains a challenge3,24.
To date, several techniques have been used to estimate the scleral biomechanical properties of the intact eye3. Recent experimental studies have applied inflation testing20,22,25,26 and air-puff induced deformation combined with finite element modeling27,28 to obtain the dynamic response of the sclera ex vivo. Other studies have attempted to estimate a single stiffness value in different scleral regions. Bronte et al.28 combined Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) air-puff deformation imaging and finite element modeling to estimate material property parameters in porcine sclera and cornea ex vivo. Using a hyper-elastic Yeoh material model, this work reported a corneal stiffness value of 0.7 ± 0.1 MPa, while the scleral stiffness ranged from 1.8 ± 0.3 to 6.0 ± 2.1 MPa, depending on the region. Ramier et al.29 applied Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) to measure scleral biomechanics in healthy human subjects. In this technique the sclera was excited by a vibrating contact probe placed onto the ocular surface to produce surface waves, the propagation of which is related to the shear modulus of the tissue. This work showed the first in vivo measurements of the shear modulus in the human eye, including the cornea and the anterior, accessible, sclera. The mechanical anisotropy of scleral tissue was not investigated in that work, perhaps because the experimental configuration with lateral excitation is not optimal to capture anisotropy.
There is considerable evidence that the scleral properties are highly anisotropic due to the fiber distribution, making stiffness measurements in the sclera direction-dependent18,20,23,30. Previous studies have demonstrated the preferential orientation of collagen fibrils using wide-angle X-ray scattering30,31 and inflation testing22,32. Regional stiffness values have been extracted from biaxial testing21,33 and uniaxial testing18 in animal and human scleral tissue. Characterizing scleral anisotropy is important for predicting its response to different mechanical stimuli, as well as an indicator of change in collagen organization, in connection, for example, with myopia34,35. However, it has been challenging to experimentally assess scleral anisotropy of intact tissues (whole globe) noninvasively. Recently, emerging techniques, such as Brillouin microscopy36,37. Magnetic resonance Elastography38 and Optical Coherence Elastography39, have been applied to quantify corneal biomechanics. Dynamic OCE imaging is a versatile technique that can be combined with different stimuli40 such as micro-air-puff stimulation41,42, piezoelectric excitation29,43, acoustic micro-tapping44,45,46, sound excitation47,48,49 and air-coupled ultrasonic (ACUS) excitation50,51 to detect mechanical wave propagating in the ocular tissue. In studies on the ex vivo porcine sclera, OCE has been applied on the anterior and posterior scleral surface using low43 and high52 excitation frequencies, estimating wave speed values around 10 m/s at 0.8 kHz (anterior sclera), and 21.6 ± 2.5 m/s at 16 kHz (posterior sclera). Thus, wave-based OCE has demonstrated its feasibility to account for the shear modulus of tissue and could be a useful tool for non-invasive in situ mapping of scleral stiffness. Additionally, its capability of measuring mechanical properties of the sclera in conditions that maintain its physiological integrity similar to in vivo conditions is fundamental for basic research and facilitates its clinical translation.
In this article, we report, for the first time to our knowledge, quantitative, non-contact measurements of scleral biomechanics and anisotropy on a rabbit eye model, using a multi-directional (8 radial directions) air-coupled ultrasonic OCE (ACUS-OCE) imaging approach. In our experimental implementation, the ultrasonic excitation is focally produced on the ocular tissue and a multi-directional acquisition configuration allowed a radial mapping of the phase speed (which is the wave speed at a specific frequency) of the resulting elastic surface waves, for the first time within a single measurement. In addition, the Young´s modulus was obtained from strip extensiometry for comparison to the shear modulus. Our study included seven enucleated rabbit eyes that were measured at four different scleral locations, and at the corneal apex. Our results revealed a faster and directional-dependent phase speed on the scleral surface in comparison to the cornea, giving insights into the scleral mechanical anisotropy. We also demonstrated that the estimated shear moduli were largest in the anterior scleral zone and smallest in the posterior zone, but no correlation was found between the estimated shear and Young´s modulus in the investigated corneal and scleral locations.
Methods
Eyes were prepared, measured with multi-directional OCE system, then strips were cut and extensiometry was performed. In the following, all experimental methods are described in detail:
Sample preparation
Seven freshly enucleated rabbit eyes from adult New Zealand white rabbits (2–3 kg) were obtained (Facultad de Veterinaria, Complutense University of Madrid) and used within 30 h post-mortem. The rabbits were euthanized by cervical dislocation in the context of veterinary activities ((CEA)‐UCM‐5414122021‐2021). Before measurements, muscles and conjunctival tissue were removed from the sclera, and five locations (1 corneal, 4 scleral) were identified and marked: central cornea (C), and superior nasal (SN), inferior nasal (IN), superior temporal (ST), and inferior temporal (IT) sclera (Fig. 1a). The scleral locations were defined at 3 mm away from the limbus along the nasal-temporal meridional line towards the optic nerve (green line, Fig. 1a), and 5 mm away along the equatorial circumferential axis (red line, Fig. 1a). The corneal location was defined at the corneal apex. After preparation, the intact eye was placed in a customized holder and aligned with the OCT laser scanning beam. A 25-gauge needle connected to a pressure control system was inserted through the optic nerve head to maintain the eye at a constant intraocular pressure (IOP) of 15 mmHg during the measurements. After the OCE measurements, scleral and corneal strips were extracted from the globes within 24 h and mechanically stretched. All measurements were completed on the same day.
Multi-directional optical coherence elastography system
OCE measurements were performed using a phase-sensitive swept-source optical coherence tomography system (PhS-SS-OCT), combined with an air-coupled ultrasonic transducer for tissue excitation51. The PhS-SS-OCT is a custom-built system reported in previous publications49,53 featuring a swept source (SL132120, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) centered at 1300 nm (VCSEL) with a spectral 3 dB-bandwidth (50 nm) and an axial scan rate of 200 kHz. The OCT axial and transverse resolution in air is 16 μm and 40 µm (at the focal plane), respectively. PhS-OCT mode49 was used to obtain the sub-resolution sample displacements over time in response to a stimulation. The system provides multi-directional scanning using high-speed galvanometric scanning mirrors (Saturn 1B, Scanner MAX, Pangolin, USA). We used this functionality to acquire 8 radial directions of 15 mm length (16 semi-axes) equally distributed over 360 degrees (0°–337.5° in steps of 22.5°) (see Fig. 1c).
The acoustic transducer was co-focused and co-axially aligned with the sample arm of the PhS-SS-OCT by means of a 15 mm diameter aperture through which the OCT laser beam could pass. This set-up allowed the acquisition of multiple scans of wave propagation while the transducer induced elastic waves on the ocular tissue (Fig. 1b). The acoustic beam had a lateral spot size of approx. 0.6 mm. The transducer was excited with a 3-cycle 2 kHz train of square pulses modulating at 0.5 MHz signal which was amplified with a radiofrequency amplifier (100A250A, Amplifier Research, USA).
OCE measurements
For this work, a multi-directional M-B scanning protocol41 was introduced during the acoustic stimulation to capture the tissue excitation in 8 radial directions. In our protocol, 450 A-scans were acquired for high temporal resolution with Δt = 5 µs at each spatial point. This M-mode scan was repeated for 100 spatial positions along each B-scan, which consisted of 45,000 A-scans and covered the transverse range of 15 mm with 0.15 mm spatial resolution. The B-scans were acquired in 8 radial directions with a rotation step of 22.5 degrees from the horizontal direction centered at the corneal location or the transversal direction (meridional planes) at the scleral locations, as previously described in Fig. 1c. The total acquisition time was 1.8 s, including the 8 M-B-mode radial scans centered at each location in Fig. 1a. Eyes were located in a custom-made holder and the locations (C, SN, IN, ST or IT) were aligned to the OCT sample arm (Fig. 1b). Samples were excited to generate elastic waves on the sample surface. OCE measurements were performed at the five locations (Fig. 1d) in each eye using the scan pattern. Each eye location was measured three times, with a time separation of 30 s between measurements to avoid wave coupling. The eye was kept hydrated with drops of saline solution between measurements. Phase speed and thickness values were obtained from the images taken by the OCT system for each location (see examples of OCT images in Supplementary Figs. 5–7) and each of the 16 angles. Because data were obtained from both left and right eyes, all results were inverted with respect to the vertical axis to be considered as coming from left eyes.
Phase speed, tissue thickness, and shear modulus calculation
The phase speed of the Lamb wave speed54 was quantified at both corneal and scleral locations using the previously reported Fourier estimators41,51. In short, the phase speed calculation is performed in the spatio-temporal domain (Fig. 2a) which is converted into the spectral domain by applying the 2D Fourier transform (see Fig. 2b). Subsequently, the transformed signal is evaluated at the excitation frequency of \(\omega =2\pi \cdot 2000 \text{Hz}\) to estimate the phase speed per each of the 16 semi-axes. Polar plots were used to present the phase speed (in m/s) as a function of the wave propagation angle measured, and to give a visual assessment of tissue anisotropy (Fig. 2c).
Both corneal and scleral thicknesses were determined from automatic segmentation of B-mode OCT images using an edge detection algorithm51 at each tested location (C, SN, IN, ST, IT). The algorithm detected the external and internal surface of the tissue and measured the averaged thickness within a 5 mm lateral window located at each semi-axis. The measured thickness was corrected by the corresponding refractive indices of cornea \({n}_{cornea}\sim 1.376\), and sclera \({n}_{sclera}\sim 1.42\)55,56. The shear modulus was estimated using the modified Rayleigh-Lamb frequency equation (mRLFE) model43,54. This approach has been applied to phase speed data assuming, as first approximation, that corneal and scleral tissue are isotropic, homogenous, and viscoelastic material51. Although this model does not fully account for the anisotropy of the data since it will require a priori information of scleral biomechanics, it has been assumed tissue isotropy in a constrained region of interest and propagation direction as a first approximation to quantify direction-dependent elastic moduli for interrogating scleral anisotropy. The shear modulus was calculated from phase speed and thickness data obtained from OCE measurements at each tested location and on each of the 16 semi-axis (8 directions).
The data of scleral phase speed were pooled and grouped in anterior, and posterior zones, and meridional and circumferential orientations. The anterior zone was defined as the semi-axes at angles 0°, 22.5°, and 337.5° (SN/IN locations), and semi-axis at angles 157.5°, 180° and 202.5° (ST/IT locations). The posterior zone was defined as the semi-axes at angles 157.5°,180°,202.5° (SN/IN locations), and 0°, 22.5°and 337.5° (ST/IT locations).
To compare results between meridional and circumferential orientations, the meridional zone was defined with the semi-axes at angles 0°, 22.5°, 157.5°, 180°, 202.5°, and 337.5°, and the circumferential zone at angles 67.5°, 90°, 112.5°, 247.5°, 270°, and 292.5°. The mean phase speed of the cornea was calculated as the mean of the corneal phase speed data at all angles.
Mechanical anisotropy parameters
Using the calculated phase speed, three anisotropy parameters were assessed, (1) the normalized fractional anisotropy (NFA)42, (2) the maximum of modified planar anisotropy coefficient (maxMPAC)42, and (3) the major-axis angle (MAA) of the phase speed polar plots. The normalized fractional anisotropy (Supplementary equation (G.1)) is a single estimation of the anisotropy degree using phase speed values at each location. NFA values close to zero show smaller speed differences and low anisotropy, while values close to 1 are associated with greater differences and high anisotropy. The planar anisotropy coefficient (Supplementary equation (G.2)) represents the spatial anisotropy. MPAC was calculated using the phase speed as a measure of the planar-transverse strain ratio at each semi-axis. MPAC values greater than 1 (high anisotropy) correspond to an “earing” behavior (the ripple at the edge of the polar graph that represents the effects of speed in planar anisotropy57). Finally, the major-axis angle in the phase speed polar plots in all scleral locations was obtained using principal component analysis. The MAA corresponds to the direction of the first principal axis measured from the corneal limbus to the optic nerve head.
Uniaxial extensiometry
After the OCE measurements, sclera and cornea strips were extracted from the globes and mechanically stretched. The epithelium, choroid and retina were removed, and samples were stored less than 60 min in a custom-made humid chamber with salt solution before tensile testing. Sclera strips (3 mm × 20 mm) were cut in meridional direction, around the SN and IN locations (see Fig. 1d). Corneal strips (3 mm × 20 mm) were cut along the superior-inferior direction. The dimensions of all strips were measured with a caliper (analogue, Alca, 0.05 mm, 1–150 mm) and a micrometer (digital, Mitutoyo, model 293-240-30).
Uniaxial tensile test was performed using a UStretch (CellScale, Waterloo, ON, Canada). The free length between the clamps was 6 mm before stretching. Specimens were subjected to five loading/unloading cycles at a rate of 1.0 mm/min with a preload force of 0.05N during the first cycle only. During the cycles, the specimens were kept immersed in saline solution. All specimens were cut and tested immediately after the OCE measurements. Stress–strain curves after five preconditioning cycles were used for stiffness estimation. Young’s modulus was obtained from the data of these curves at 7% of strain. This strain was calculated for IOP = 15 mmHg (see also detailed explanation in Supplementary section A).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS (Version 27.0). Data were labeled and compared between locations (C, SN, IN, ST, IT) and zones (anterior, posterior, meridional, circumferential). ANOVAs were conducted to assess differences between the means of the parametric variables: phase speed, maxMPAC and MAA. Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H tests were used to compare differences between the means of the variables: shear modulus, thickness, Young’s modulus, and NFA. Specific location and zone effects were evaluated using a post-hoc test with a Bonferroni correction. Significance was set at p-value of 0.05. All values in bar plots are indicated as mean ± standard deviation and the boxplots display the first quartile, median, and third quartile. Error bars in boxplots are the 95% confidence interval.
Results
Phase speed at different eye globe locations
Figure 3 provides an overview of the phase speed polar plots for each ocular location. A visual inspection of Fig. 3 shows that the direction of fastest phase speed tends to align with the equatorial circumferential axis (red, dashed line in Fig. 3) and appears to be horizontally symmetric, while the cornea follows a more circular symmetric distribution, which suggests that the rabbit sclera is anisotropic, showing a preferential orientation. This orientation is not influenced by the positioning of the eye (see Supplementary Fig. 1).
An exploratory estimation of these symmetries was performed using only the vertical and horizontal axes of the phase speed polar plots, in both sclera and cornea. Supplementary Table 1 presents the results of the mean phase speed at these two specific axes for the five locations. A V-H ratio was defined by dividing the mean vertical speed by the mean horizontal speed. For all samples, the calculated ratios suggest a more circular symmetric behavior of the cornea with a calculated V-H ratio of 1, in contrast to a more horizontally symmetrical behavior (“earing”) of the sclera with a V-H ratio close to 2.
Phase speed, shear modulus and thickness estimates
Phase speed, shear modulus, and thickness of the sclera and cornea were determined for each location and semi-axis angle. Figure 4 shows the mean phase speed distributed by zones. Comparison of corneal and scleral data revealed that the average wave propagated significantly slower (p < 0.001) in the corneal tissue (5.9 ± 1.4 m/s, light blue bars) than in the scleral tissue (12.1 ± 3.2 m/s). On the other hand, in the scleral tissue the wave propagated significantly faster (p < 0.001) in the anterior than the posterior globe (10.1 ± 1.8 m/s vs. 8.0 ± 1.7 m/s, Fig. 4a), and in the circumferential than in meridional directions (15.4 ± 3.7 m/s vs. 9.1 ± 1.5 m/s, Fig. 4b). All phase speed values are shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Figure 5 shows the results of the phase speed (Fig. 5a, d), sample thickness (Fig. 5b, e), and shear modulus (Fig. 5c, f) for the anterior (orange bars), posterior (purple bars), meridional (green bars) and the circumferential (red bars) zones of the sclera, and for all scleral locations (SN, IN, ST, IT, see Fig. 1a) individually. Figure 5a shows significantly (p ≤ 0.032) higher phase speeds in the anterior zones with respect to the posterior zones at the following locations: SN, IN and ST (see Supplementary Table 2). In addition, phase speed measurements along circumferential direction were significantly higher (p = 0.001) than in meridional direction at all locations (see Fig. 5d).
Scleral thicknesses were determined at each location. Pairwise comparisons indicated that scleral thickness (316.8 ± 39.8 μm) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than corneal thickness (511.1 ± 58.9 μm). Scleral thickness was greatest in posterior/meridional scleral location in SN (364.5 ± 53.2 μm/348.1 ± 39.9 μm), and lowest in posterior/meridional scleral location in IT (276.2 ± 27.7 μm/289.5 ± 30.9 μm).
The shear modulus was estimated from the mRLFE model using the measured phase speed and thickness data from each semi-axis. Statistical analysis showed that the shear modulus of the anterior sclera (27.3 ± 1.8 kPa) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of the posterior sclera (17.8 ± 1.4 kPa), and cornea (11.2 ± 4.1 kPa) (see Supplementary Table 2). In the subsequent analysis by locations, the shear modulus was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.046) in the anterior superior than in the posterior superior zone (SN and ST in Fig. 5c). The mean shear modulus in the circumferential direction (65.4 ± 31.9 kPa) was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.004) than in the meridional direction (22.5 ± 7.2 kPa) at all scleral locations (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Table 3).
Phase speed anisotropy
Figure 6 shows the calculated anisotropy parameters NFA (Fig. 6a), maxMPAC (Fig. 6b), and the MAA (Fig. 6c). Both NFA and maxMPAC showed a significant difference (p ≤ 0.005) in anisotropy between the cornea (0.17 ± 0.05 and 0.42 ± 0.33, respectively) and the sclera (0.48 ± 0.04 and 4.73 ± 2.71, respectively), with the sclera being more anisotropic by a factor of 3 and 11, for NFA and maxMPAC, respectively. There was no significant difference between scleral locations (p = 0.94). In addition, the angle-dependent MPAC is presented as a function of each directional angle to exhibit differences in corneal and scleral locations (see Supplementary Fig. 2). Figure 6c shows the major axis angle (MAA), which represents the direction of the first principal axis in the polar plots, for all scleral locations. The MAA shows a subtle tilt from the equatorial circumferential axis (90°, 270°), which (considered the orientation at all locations, see Fig. 3) can be interpreted as a tilt towards the optic nerve head for location SN, IN, and IT, and towards the corneal limbus for location ST (see Supplementary Fig. 3). Specifically, the major axis angles at the lower eye locations (IN and IT) had a greater inclination, with the mean angle being greater at the IN location than at the IT location (113.2° ± 9.9° vs. 97.0° ± 14.6°). The orientation in superior locations was similar (93.9° ± 10.0° and 87.0° ± 8.3°, for SN and ST, respectively).
Comparison of shear modulus and Young’s modulus
The shear modulus (SM) estimated from OCE measurements was compared to the Young´s modulus (YM) obtained from uniaxial extensiometry. The SM values were taken at the corresponding meridional axes (see Fig. 5f and Supplementary Table 3) for the scleral nasal locations (SN, IN), and on the vertical axes (at 90° and 270°) of the cornea, to match with the orientation of the strips used in the tensile test (Fig. 1d). Figure 7a shows that corneal SM and YM (11.6 ± 4.8 kPa and 1.8 ± 0.7 MPa, respectively) were significantly lower (p = 0.04) than scleral SM and YM (22.0 ± 6.6 kPa and 3.5 ± 0.9 MPa, respectively). Using Spearman correlation analysis, SM and YM showed a moderate correlation in the cornea, without reaching statistical significance (\({r}_{s}\) = 0.68, p = 0.09), and no correlation in the sclera (\({r}_{s}\) = 0.13, p = 0.64) (see Fig. 7b).
Discussion
We have presented, for the first time to our knowledge, multi-directional wave-based Optical Coherence Elastography as a method to map the anisotropic behavior across the sclera in comparison to the cornea, in excised (whole globe) rabbit eyes. Both the Young’s modulus and the shear modulus were lower in the cornea than in the sclera (with the YM two orders of magnitude higher than the SM, Fig. 7a), and while in the cornea there was some association (not reaching statistical significance) between moduli, they appeared uncorrelated in the sclera. We also found that the sclera is stiffer, both circumferentially (along the equator) and in the anterior zone, than meridionally, and in the posterior zone, respectively. The highest shear modulus values were found in the circumferential superior sclera (Fig. 5c, f). Multi-directional OCE allowed a radial mapping of mechanical properties in different locations and orientations on intact eyes. Furthermore, the shear modulus obtained from OCE may be capturing highly relevant information related to biochemical composition and collagen organization and interweaving.
The Young’s modulus describes tensile elasticity, quantifying the relationship between stress and strain under uniaxial force, compression, or tension. In contrast, the shear modulus describes the tendency of an object to deform in response to a tangential force, causing a change in shape without a change in volume. The lack of correspondence between Young’s and shear modulus is not unexpected, as simple relations only hold for isotropic homogeneous materials, while the cornea and sclera material properties rather respond to a structural composite material with high degree of heterogeneity and anisotropy14,46,58, which we found to be even larger in the sclera.
Differences in Young’s and shear modulus have been reported in the cornea as a function of age with the former doubling over an 80-year span59 and the latter remaining constant over an age range of 25 to 67 years29. These discrepancies are explained by the fact that the two techniques address distinct mechanical properties which may vary depending on physiological conditions or disease. However, the nearly-incompressible transverse isotropy (NITI) model46 has demonstrated a decoupling between tensile and shear response in porcine corneal OCE measurements, showing that corneal biomechanics describe an isotropic behavior at pressures below 30 mmHg. In particular, it has been argued that extensiometry may be associated with the stiffness of the individual collagen fibrils, whereas the OCE technique may depend primarily on the properties of the interfibrillar and interlamellar matrix. This is of a special interest in the sclera, where regional variations in the composition of the fibrillary collagen network and GAGs have been linked to scleral mechanical behavior12,60.
In addition, a study of scleral elastic response to IOP variations using a constitutive model22 showed that the elastic modulus has significant effect on collagen fibril strain, while the shear modulus has impact on the deformation of the scleral shell plane. The notion that the shear modulus estimated from OCE may target the mechanical properties of scleral extracellular hydrogel and stiffness resulting from collagen fibril interweaving directly, may partly explain the lack of significant differences in the elastic behavior of GAG-depleted and normal scleral strips in a uniaxial testing protocol12, despite their fundamental role on the regulation of collagen assembly and organization61.
Corneal and scleral tissue have different mechanical properties which are influenced by their specific composition and organization of collagen fibrils1. Human corneal collagen fibrils have a small diameter (25 nm) and are moderately organized (parallel lamellae of collagen fibrils), compared to scleral collagen, which has wider fibrils (ranging from 25 to 230 nm) and an interweaved structure (non-uniform and intertwined collagen fibril bundles)2. These differences in the internal organization of the tissue are likely behind the variations in phase speed (and consequently, the shear modulus) between the corneal (5.9 ± 1.4 m/s) and scleral tissue (12.1 ± 3.2 m/s) reported here. In addition, our average data are in good agreement with recent results in patient studies that reported a wave speed twice as high in the sclera than in the cornea29.
The relatively lower anisotropy of the cornea compared to the sclera is consistent with previous work using different techniques to probe corneal mechanical properties. For example, angle-dependent phase speed measurements in corneal tissues have been studied with Brillouin microscopy and constitutive models36,37 to relate the Brillouin modulus to elastic anisotropy. Eltony et al.37 estimated a degree of anisotropy considering the aligned of the fiber composite in the cornea reporting values of 0.18 ± 0.03 (porcine) and 0.12 ± 0.02 (human). For better comparison, we calculated an analogous anisotropy parameter (Supplementary Fig. 4) based on phase speed62, which resulted in lower results for the rabbit cornea (0.03 ± 0.11), and higher ones in the sclera (0.78 ± 0.22) in comparison to the anisotropy calculated by Eltony et al.37.
In this work, the phase speed was found to be dependent on the scleral zone and direction. Local measurements in the sclera indicated significantly higher average phase speeds in the anterior zone (10.1 ± 1.8 m/s) than in the posterior zone (8.0 ± 1.7 m/s) and almost double along circumferential direction (15.4 ± 3.7 m/s) than in meridional direction (9.1 ± 1.5 m/s). Earlier literature using piezoelectric excitation reported similar values of phase speed in porcine43,52 and human29,43 sclera. Specifically, the phase speed was at least 63% faster in the circumferential zones than in other areas of the scleral tissue. This finding seems to be consistent with other research22,30,31,32 which found that this direction-dependent mechanical behavior is associated to the preferential orientation of the collagen fibers. We also found a comparable shape between the collagen fibril distribution maps reported in previous studies22,31,63 and the phase speed polar plots at the same scleral location in the current study.
To study anisotropy, we defined three parameters: normalized fractional anisotropy, maximum value of modified planar anisotropy coefficient and major-axis angle to compared cornea/sclera anisotropy with data from previous studies. We found significantly higher anisotropy in the sclera than in the cornea for NFA and maxMPAC parameters, however, no significant differences in anisotropy were found between scleral locations. The apparent corneal isotropy, which has been extensively studied in previous studies64,65,66, was not examined in this report because the focus was on the sclera. But, we should highlight that the NFA value (0.17 ± 0.05) in rabbit corneal tissue was similar to that reported previously (0.56 ± 0.05) in porcine corneas42, and that polar plots of MPAC values (Supplementary Fig. 2) also showed identical anisotropic mechanical pattern in corneas at 15 mmHg. Moreover, the MAA, which possibly reflects the predominant collagen fibril orientation in the sclera, showed a dorsal tilt (towards the optic nerve head) for all locations except at the ST location where it was tilted slightly ventrally (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3).
Anterior and posterior scleral zones presented different elastic behavior. We found that the shear modulus in the anterior scleral zone was 53% higher than in the posterior superior zone. These differences are consistent with results from studies using tensile tests, which found that the tangent modulus of the anterior sclera was twice that of the posterior sclera18,67. Prior work interpreted those differences in mechanical properties as arising from regional variations in scleral thickness for humans18,19 and rabbit eyes68. However, our OCE-based results show that, when the scleral thickness is compensated for, the posterior scleral shear modulus is still lower than that of the anterior sclera, at all locations. Interestingly, in the SN region, scleral thickness is higher than in other locations, however wave speed is still lower than in anterior regions, indicating that it is the inherent mechanical properties, and not scleral thickness, which make the posterior sclera more susceptible to deformation.
The regional variations in shear modulus between anterior and posterior sclera may be behind the preferential axial elongation of the eye during emmetropization. These differences are likely enlarged following myopigenic signaling, which leads to further scleral remodeling in the posterior sclera, and myopia development.
The highest shear modulus in the rabbit sclera was measured at circumferential orientation along the equator. On average, the circumferential shear modulus was 66% higher than that of the meridional sclera at all locations. Our results are consistent with those observed in earlier studies in which the circumferential direction was reported to be stiffer than the meridional direction after biaxial mechanical testing in the porcine sclera21,33. They also confirm a preferential orientation and suggest a high density and/or high degree of interweaving of collagen fibrils in the circumferential direction at the equator. However, our results differ from the earlier published preferential meridional orientation for rat scleral fibers19, but they are broadly consistent with earlier experiments31,32,63 and constitutive models22 in mouse, human, and rat scleras.
The findings in this work are subject to at least three limitations. First, scleral tissue thickness, which is thicker than the investigated rabbit tissue (500–800 µm in humans vs. 200–400 µm in rabbits), may be difficult to estimate from OCT images due to higher scattering and opacity of the sclera compared to the cornea. The custom-developed PhS-SS-OCT system uses 1300 nm swept-source and has a high penetration because of the long wavelength band and ideally signal roll-off along the axial depth, making it challenging to improve the imaging capabilities for the sclera. Second, the shear modulus was calculated based on a linear elastic approximation. The modified Rayleigh-Lamb frequency equation model considers a viscoelastic material with isotropic and homogenous response. Nevertheless, the sclera is a non-linear elastic material22 with an anisotropic structure19 and subject to prestress tension69. These are important considerations for modeling wave propagation in the sclera in future research. In this study, our calculated values of the shear modulus in the cornea agree with previous studies in rabbits using atomic force microscopy70 and an inflation test with inverse analysis71, so it is likely that these assumptions only moderately affect our results. In any case, given the expected intrinsic differences between Young’s and shear modulus in the sclera, future work may elucidate the physicochemical and microstructural factors underlying the scleral biomechanical properties captured by each technique, and the value that they offer in understanding basic mechanisms of the scleral physiology, its changes with disease and its response to treatment.
Third, an important consideration regarding the elastic properties of the sclera is the influence of the fixed IOP during OCE measurements. IOP induces a pre-stressing effect on ocular tissues that directly affects tissue stiffness25,72. Simulations have shown that the estimated phase speed at frequencies around 2 kHz (the frequency used in this manuscript to estimate the shear modulus) can be affected by pre-stress69 in a transversely isotropic material. Specifically, Sun et al.73 have described a two-fold reduction in corneal shear modulus at 15 mmHg in porcine eyes, which may also apply to the sclera. Thus, although OCE has a key advantage over strip extensiometry in its non-invasive nature, this technique requires the eye to be maintained at constant IOP conditions, or it could have a significant effect on the shear modulus estimation. Therefore, future work using our set-up will include the measurement of controlled IOP changes and its effects on the estimation of scleral biomechanical parameters. Favorably, OCE at lower frequencies (1–3 kHz) appears to have the advantage of introducing less additional stress69 than other non-invasive techniques, such as air-puff deformation.
In summary, we have shown that multi-directional ACUS-OCE is an effective, non-invasive, and non-contact technique to estimate the biomechanics of the sclera. In this study, the biomechanics of the sclera of intact rabbit eyes were determined in different zones (anterior, posterior, meridional and circumferential) and orientations (16 angles) using a single measurement. The multi-directional detection of wave propagation in different regions provides a unique opportunity to map the sclera and to obtain its mechanical anisotropy. These results are expected to find application in the development of improved computational or physical ocular models to study scleral involvement in healthy eyes, as well as to evaluate the effects of myopia-triggering signals and identify appropriate biomarkers for disease monitoring. ACUS-OCE may also assist in evaluating possible myopia treatment strategies to strengthen the sclera.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Watson, P. G. & Young, R. D. Scleral structure, organisation and disease. A review. Exp. Eye Res. 78, 609–623 (2004).
Komai, Y. & Ushiki, T. The three-dimensional organization of collagen fibrils in the human cornea and sclera. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32, 2244–2258 (1991).
Boote, C. et al. Scleral structure and biomechanics. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 74, 1–87 (2020).
Mutti, D. O. et al. Corneal and crystalline lens dimensions before and after myopia onset. Comp. Study 89, 251–262 (2013).
Muralidharan, G. et al. Morphological changes of human crystalline lens in myopia. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 10, 6084 (2019).
Consejo, A. & Rozema, J. J. In vivo anterior scleral morphometry, axial length and myopia. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 43, 21–25 (2020).
Niyazmand, H., Read, S. A., Atchison, D. A. & Collins, M. J. Anterior eye shape in emmetropes, low to moderate myopes, and high myopes. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 44, 101361 (2021).
Troilo, D., Nickla, D. L., Mertz, J. R. & Rada, J. A. S. Change in the synthesis rates of ocular retinoic acid and scleral glycosaminoglycan during experimentally altered eye growth in marmosets. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 1768–1777 (2006).
Summers, J. A., Schaeffel, F., Marcos, S., Wu, H. & Tkatchenko, A. V. Functional integration of eye tissues and refractive eye development: Mechanisms and pathways. Exp. Eye Res. 209, 108693 (2021).
Summers Rada, J. A., Shelton, S. & Norton, T. T. The sclera and myopia. Exp. Eye Res. 82, 185–200 (2006).
Shelton, L. & Rada, J. S. Effects of cyclic mechanical stretch on extracellular matrix synthesis by human scleral fibroblasts. Exp. Eye Res. 84, 314–322 (2007).
Hatami-Marbini, H. & Pachenari, M. Tensile viscoelastic properties of the sclera after glycosaminoglycan depletion. Curr. Eye Res. 46, 1299–1308 (2021).
Phillips, J. R. & McBrien, N. A. Form deprivation myopia: elastic properties of sclera. Ophthalm. Physiol. Opt. 15, 357–362 (1995).
McBrien, N. A. & Gentle, A. Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 22, 307–338 (2003).
Girard, M. J. A., Downs, J. C., Burgoyne, C. F. & Suh, J.-K. F. Peripapillary and posterior scleral mechanics–part I: development of an anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model. J. Biomech. Eng. 131(5), 051011 (2009).
McBrien, N. A., Jobling, A. I. & Gentle, A. Biomechanics of the sclera in myopia: Extracellular and cellular factors. Optometry Vis. Sci. 86, E23–E30 (2009).
Trier, K., Olsen, E. B. & Ammitzbøll, T. Regional glycosaminoglycans composition of the human sclera. Acta Ophthalmol. 68, 304–306 (1990).
Elsheikh, A. et al. Regional variation in the biomechanical properties of the human sclera. Exp. Eye Res. 90, 624–633 (2010).
Girard, M. J. A. et al. Quantitative mapping of scleral fiber orientation in normal rat eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 9684–9693 (2011).
Coudrillier, B. et al. Biomechanics of the human posterior sclera: Age- and glaucoma-related changes measured using inflation testing. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 1714–1728 (2012).
Cruz Perez, B. et al. Biaxial mechanical testing of posterior sclera using high-resolution ultrasound speckle tracking for strain measurements. J. Biomech. 47, 1151–1156 (2014).
Grytz, R. et al. Material properties of the posterior human sclera. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 29, 602–617 (2014).
Voorhees, A. P., Jan, N. J., Hua, Y., Yang, B. & Sigal, I. A. Peripapillary sclera architecture revisited: A tangential fiber model and its biomechanical implications. Acta Biomater. 79, 113–122 (2018).
Parker, K. J., Doyley, M. M. & Rubens, D. J. Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: The 20 year perspective. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, R1 (2011).
Whitford, C. et al. Ex vivo testing of intact eye globes under inflation conditions to determine regional variation of mechanical stiffness. Eye Vis. 3, 21 (2016).
Elsheikh, A. & Anderson, K. Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests. J. R. Soc. Interface 2, 177–185 (2005).
Nguyen, B. A., Roberts, C. J. & Reilly, M. A. Biomechanical impact of the sclera on corneal deformation response to an air-puff: A finite-element study. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6, 1–8 (2019).
Bronte-Ciriza, D. et al. Estimation of scleral mechanical properties from air-puff optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 12, 6341 (2021).
Ramier, A. et al. In vivo measurement of shear modulus of the human cornea using optical coherence elastography. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10 (2020).
Pijanka, J. K. et al. Quantitative mapping of collagen fiber orientation in non-glaucoma and glaucoma posterior human sclerae. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 5258–5270 (2012).
Pijanka, J. K. et al. Changes in scleral collagen organization in murine chronic experimental glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 6554–6564 (2014).
Schwaner, S. A., Hannon, B. G., Feola, A. J. & Ethier, C. R. Biomechanical properties of the rat sclera obtained with inverse finite element modeling. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 19, 2195–2212 (2020).
Ndlovu, Z., Desai, D., Pandelani, T. & Ngwangwa, H. Biaxial Estimation of Biomechanical Constitutive Parameters of Passive Porcine Sclera Soft Tissue. Vol. 2022 (2022).
Markov, P. P. et al. Bulk changes in posterior scleral collagen microstructure in human high myopia. Mol. Vis. 24, 818–833 (2018).
Hoerig, C., McFadden, S., Hoang, Q. V. & Mamou, J. Biomechanical changes in myopic sclera correlate with underlying changes in microstructure. Exp. Eye Res. 224, 109165 (2022).
Webb, J. N., Zhang, H., Roy, A. S., Randleman, J. B. & Scarcelli, G. Detecting mechanical anisotropy of the cornea using brillouin microscopy. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 9, 1–11 (2020).
Eltony, A. M., Shao, P. & Yun, S. H. Measuring mechanical anisotropy of the cornea with Brillouin microscopy. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–19 (2022).
Litwiller, D. V. et al. MR elastography of the ex vivo bovine globe. J. Magnet. Resonan. Imaging 32, 44–51 (2010).
Larin, K. V. & Sampson, D. D. Optical coherence elastography—OCT at work in tissue biomechanics [invited]. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 8, 1172 (2017).
Kirby, M. A. et al. Optical coherence elastography in ophthalmology. J. Biomed. Opt. 22, 1 (2017).
Wang, S. & Larin, K. V. Shear wave imaging optical coherence tomography (SWI-OCT) for ocular tissue biomechanics. Opt. Lett. 39, 41–44 (2014).
Singh, M. et al. Investigating elastic anisotropy of the porcine cornea as a function of intraocular pressure with optical coherence elastography. J. Refract. Surg. 32, 562–567 (2016).
Zvietcovich, F. et al. Dynamic optical coherence elastography of the anterior eye: Understanding the biomechanics of the limbus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61, 33 (2020).
Ambroziński, Ł et al. Acoustic micro-tapping for non-contact 4D imaging of tissue elasticity. Sci. Rep. 6, 38967 (2016).
Kirby, M. A. et al. Delineating corneal elastic anisotropy in a porcine model using noncontact OCT elastography and ex vivo mechanical tests. Ophthalmol. Sci. 1, 100058 (2021).
Pitre, J. J. et al. Nearly-incompressible transverse isotropy (NITI) of cornea elasticity: Model and experiments with acoustic micro-tapping OCE. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–14 (2020).
Kling, S. et al. Numerical model of optical coherence tomographic vibrography imaging to estimate corneal biomechanical properties. J. R. Soc. Interface 11 (2014).
Akca, B. I. et al. Observation of sound-induced corneal vibrational modes by optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 6, 3313–3319 (2015).
McAuley, R. et al. Co-axial acoustic-based optical coherence vibrometry probe for the quantification of resonance frequency modes in ocular tissue. Sci. Rep. 12, 18834 (2022).
Zvietcovich, F. et al. Confocal air-coupled ultrasonic optical coherence elastography probe for quantitative biomechanics. Opt. Lett. 45, 6567–6570 (2020).
Zvietcovich, F. et al. In vivo assessment of corneal biomechanics under a localized cross-linking treatment using confocal air-coupled optical coherence elastography. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 13, 2644 (2022).
Vinas-Pena, M., Feng, X., Li, G. & Yun, S.-H. In situ measurement of the stiffness increase in the posterior sclera after UV-riboflavin crosslinking by optical coherence elastography. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 13, 5434–5446 (2022).
Curatolo, A. et al. Multi-meridian corneal imaging of air-puff induced deformation for improved detection of biomechanical abnormalities. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 11, 6337 (2020).
Han, Z. et al. Optical coherence elastography assessment of corneal viscoelasticity with a modified Rayleigh–Lamb wave model. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 66, 87–94 (2017).
Meek, K. M. & Knupp, C. Corneal structure and transparency. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 49, 1–16 (2015).
Nemati, B., Rylander, H. G. & Welch, A. J. Optical properties of conjunctiva, sclera, and the ciliary body and their consequences for transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. Appl. Opt. 35, 3321–3327 (1996).
Yoon, J. W., Barlat, F., Dick, R. E. & Karabin, M. E. Prediction of six or eight ears in a drawn cup based on a new anisotropic yield function. Int. J. Plast. 22, 174–193 (2006).
Dupps, W. J. & Wilson, S. E. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp. Eye Res. 83, 709–720 (2006).
Knox Cartwright, N. E., Tyrer, J. R. & Marshall, J. Age-related differences in the elasticity of the human cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 4324–4329 (2011).
Pachenari, M. & Hatami-Marbini, H. Regional differences in the glycosaminoglycan role in porcine scleral hydration and mechanical behavior. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 62, 28 (2021).
Rada, J. A., Achen, V. R., Penugonda, S., Schmidt, R. W. & Mount, B. A. Proteoglycan composition in the human sclera during growth and aging. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 1639–1648 (2000).
Thomsen, L. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics 51, 1954–1966 (1986).
Coudrillier, B. et al. Collagen structure and mechanical properties of the human sclera: Analysis for the effects of age. J. Biomech. Eng. 137 (2015).
Elsheikh, A. & Alhasso, D. Mechanical anisotropy of porcine cornea and correlation with stromal microstructure. Exp. Eye Res. 88, 1084–1091 (2009).
Whitford, C., Studer, H., Boote, C., Meek, K. M. & Elsheikh, A. Biomechanical model of the human cornea: Considering shear stiffness and regional variation of collagen anisotropy and density. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 42, 76–87 (2015).
Singh, M. et al. Assessing the effects of riboflavin/UV-A crosslinking on porcine corneal mechanical anisotropy with optical coherence elastography. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 8, 349–366 (2017).
Park, J., Shin, A., Jafari, S. & Demer, J. L. Material properties and effect of preconditioning of human sclera, optic nerve, and optic nerve sheath. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 20, 1353–1363 (2021).
Barathi, A., Thu, M. K. & Beuerman, R. W. Dimensional growth of the rabbit eye. Cells Tissues Organs 171, 276–285 (2002).
Crutison, J., Sun, M. & Royston, T. J. The combined importance of finite dimensions, anisotropy, and pre-stress in acoustoelastography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 2403–2413 (2022).
Thomasy, S. M. et al. Elastic modulus and collagen organization of the rabbit cornea: Epithelium to endothelium. Acta Biomater. 10, 785–791 (2014).
Bao, F. et al. Effects of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical properties of the rabbit cornea. Exp. Eye Res. 161, 82–88 (2017).
Pierscionek, B. K., Asejczyk-Widlicka, M. & Schachar, R. A. The effect of changing intraocular pressure on the corneal and scleral curvatures in the fresh porcine eye. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 91, 801 (2007).
Sun, M. G. et al. Optical coherence elastography for assessing the influence of intraocular pressure on elastic wave dispersion in the cornea. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 128, 105100 (2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Prof. Luis Revuelta Rueda from Complutense University of Madrid for help with the animal tissue.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This work has been funded by Spanish Government Grant (PRE2018-086169, FIS2017-84753-R, PID2020-115191RB-I00); European Project H2020 IMCUSTOMEYE (779960); European Research Council (2018-ADG-SILKEYE-833106); Ayudas Ramón y Cajal (RYC2022-037910-I); L'Oréal-UNESCO “For Women in Science” Spain; NIH NEI P30EY 001319; Unrestricted Funds Research to Prevent Blindness.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and design: L.V., F.Z., S.M., J.S.B.; Data acquisition: L.V., F.Z.; Data analysis/interpretation: L.V., F.Z., S.M., J.S.B.; Drafting manuscript: L.V., F.Z; Critical revision of manuscript: S.M., J.S.B.; Statistical analysis: L.V., J.S.B.; Supervision: S.M., J.S.B.; Final approval: S.M., J.S.B. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
J.S.B and S.M are inventors on a patent (EP3858225, 2021) and F.Z and S.M on a patent (EP4257058, 2023) related to OCT and ACUS-OCE technology, respectively. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Villegas, L., Zvietcovich, F., Marcos, S. et al. Revealing regional variations in scleral shear modulus in a rabbit eye model using multi-directional ultrasound optical coherence elastography. Sci Rep 14, 21010 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71343-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71343-0
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.