## Abstract

In this article, we investigated the solitary wave solutions of the KdV–mKdV equation using Hirota’s bilinear method. Closed-form analytical single and multiple solitary wave solutions were obtained. Through qualitative methods and the analysis of solitary waveforms, we discovered that in addition to sech-type solitary waves, the system also contains \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves. By employing the trial functions method, we obtained a single \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave and verified its existence and stability using the split-Step Fourier Transform method. Furthermore, we use the collision of two \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type single solitary waves to excite a stable \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type double solitary wave. Similarly, we excite a stable triple solitary wave with three \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type single solitary waves. This method can also be used to excite stable multiple solitary waves. It is shown that these solitary wave solutions enrich the dynamic behavior of the KdV–mKdV equation and provide methods for solving \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves, which hold significant theoretical value.

### Similar content being viewed by others

## Introduction

The study of solutions for nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) is essential to the theory of physical mathematics and theoretical physics^{1}. These solutions help us to better understand the mechanisms of complicated nonlinear physical phenomena and the dynamic processes modeled by these nonlinear evolution equations^{2}. The KdV equation (Korteweg-de Vries equation) and the mKdV equation (modified Korteweg-de Vries equation) are two important types of nonlinear partial differential equations, widely applied in many physical systems. In some cases, these two equations can be combined to better describe complex physical phenomena. The combined KdV–mKdV equation is an important tool for describing nonlinear wave phenomena, with widespread applications in many fields, such as solid-state physics, plasma physics, fluid physics and quantum field theory^{3,4,5}. By studying these equations, we can gain a deeper understanding and predict the nonlinear behavior in complex systems, thereby advancing related science and technology. The combined equations not only enrich the theoretical foundation of nonlinear science but also provide powerful tools for solving practical problems. These combined equations play a significant role in the study of nonlinear waves, solitons, and other complex systems.

The existence of soliton-type solutions for nonlinear models is highly significant due to their potential applications in various physics areas, including nonlinear optics, plasmas, fluid mechanics, condensed matter, and many more. In fact, many kinds of soliton solutions have been obtained by using for example, the inverse scattering method^{6}, the Sub-ODE method^{7}, the tanh method^{8}, the Darboux transformation^{9}, the Lie group method^{10}, the algebrogeometric method^{11}, the homogeneous balance method^{12} and the Hirota’s method^{13}, The extended rational expansion method^{14}, The MSE method^{15} and so on.

The combined form of the Korteweg-de Vries equation and the Modified Korteweg-de Vries equation form the following so-called combined KdV–mKdV equation^{3,1}:

where \(\alpha \), \(\beta \) and \(\gamma \) are constants. Specifically, \(\alpha \) controls the strength of the first-order nonlinear effects in the equation, \(\beta \) adjusts the strength of the second-order nonlinear effects, typically describing stronger nonlinear effects, \(\gamma \) controls the strength of the dispersion effects of waves.

The KdV–mKdV equation is completely integrable, giving rise to multiple-soliton solutions. The combined KdV–mKdV equation and its generalizations have attracted increasing interest, as evidenced by numerous studies^{16,17,18,19,20,1,21,22}. The authors obtained tanh–sech type solitary solutions and triangular functions solutions in KdV–mKdV equation in Ref.^{23}. In Ref.^{24}, the tanh, coth and tan type solitary wave solutions were studied. In Ref.^{5}, the periodic progressive wave, and one and two soliton solutions were studied by various analytical methods. In Ref.^{25}, the bell-shaped soliton and a new soliton solution were obtained by a kinds of Jacobi doubly periodic solutions. Moreover, new periodic wave solutions were constructed by a method with the aid of a Sub-ODE. The rational solutions with free multi-parameters and N-soliton solutions were obtained by the bilinear approach in Ref.^{26}. Although nonlinear solitary waves in the KdV–mKdV equations have been studied extensively both analytically and numerically, there are still many open problems. For instance, we have well-developed methods for solving and analyzing soliton waves of the sech type. However, to our knowledge, there is no research on \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves, including the existence and stability of \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves in the KdV–mKdV equations.

In this work, we consider the generalized combined KdV–mKdV equation (1). By employing the method of trial functions, we derived several approximate analytic solutions of \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves. Through the application of perturbation methods^{27,28}, we investigated the stability of both single and multiple \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves, and successfully obtained stable solitary wave solutions for both single and multiple \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-types.

## The bilinear form

The Hirota’s bilinear method is an effective approach for obtaining analytical solutions to nonlinear evolution equations. Therefore, we used Hirota’s bilinear method to solve Eq. (1).

In order to find the soliton-like solutions of Eq. (1) we set

where \({a_0}\) is a constant to be determined later, and \({i^2} = - 1\) , \(f = a + bi,{f^*} = a - bi\) , \(a,b \in R\) .

Substituting the Eq. (2) into Eq. (1) yields

Integrating both sides of Eq. (3) by x once and setting the constant of integration equal to zero yields:

Expanding the Eq. (4) leads to

By a simple transformation, Eq. (5) can be transformed into the following equation:

By substitution Eq. (6) into Eq. (1) and using the properties of the bilinear operator, we obtain

In order to obtain the bilinear form of Eq. (7), setting \(\beta = 6\) , then we have

Further, we obtain the bilinear form of Eq. (8):

It should be noted that the bilinear form Eq. (9) is obtained when the coefficient \(\beta = 6\).

According to the Hirota’s bilinear method , we may choose the *f* and \({f^*}\) in the form

Substituting Eq. (10) into Eq. (9) and collecting coefficients of polynomials of with the aid of *Mathematica*, then equating the coefficients of various powers of \(\varepsilon \) to zero, we get a set of algebraic equations:

Suppose that

where \({\xi _1} = {\omega _1}t + {k_1}_`x + {c_1}\), \({\theta _1}\) are constants to be determined later

Substituting Eq. (14) into Eq. (11), we have

## Analytical solution

Based on the bilinear form of the KdV–mKdV equation, we can obtain analytical solutions for single and double solitary waves.

### Single solitary wave solutions

For single soliton solutions we set \({f^{(2)}} = {f^{(3)}} = \cdots = {f^{(n)}} = \cdots = 0\) , \({f^{(1)}} = 1 + {\mathrm{{e}}^{{\xi _1} + i{\theta _1}}}\) and \(\varepsilon = 1\) , then we have

Substituting Eq. (17) into Eq. (2), the single soliton solutions are given by

which can be rewritten as

where

### Double solitary wave solutions

Suppose that

where \({\xi _i} = {\omega _i}t + {k_i}_`x + {c_i}\) , \({\theta _i}, \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {i \in \{ 1,2\} } \end{array}\) are constants to be determined later.

Substituting Eq. (21) into Eq. (12), we have

For double soliton solutions we set \({f^{(3)}} = {f^{(4)}} = \cdots = {f^{(n)}} = \cdots = 0\) and \(\varepsilon = 1\) , then we have

Substituting Eq. (23) into Eq. (2), we obtain the double solitary wave solutions:

where \({\omega _i} = - \gamma k_i^3 - (\alpha {a_0} + 6a_0^2){k_i}\), \(k_i^2\cos {\theta _i} = \frac{1}{6}(\alpha + 12{a_0})\sin {\theta _i}\), \({\theta _i}, \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {i \in \{ 1,2\} }, \end{array}\) are constants to be determined later.

## \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave solutions

Using \(0 \le \left| {\cos \theta } \right| \le 1\) from Eq. (19), we have

and it can be transformed into

From the above qualitative analysis, it is easy to conclude that the waveform of solution (19) lies between that of sech-type and \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves.

When \(\sin {\theta _1} = 1\), solution (19) reduces to the standard sech-type solitary wave solutions

In the limit case when \({\theta _1} \rightarrow 0\) (\(\sin {\theta _1} \sim {\theta _1}\), \(\cos {\theta _1} \approx 1\) ) the solution (1) become the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave solutions

It is worth noting that due to \({\theta _1}\) possibly approaching zero, the solution may have significant errors. Solution (28) represents a specific analytical solution. To obtain a more general \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave solution, we need to adjust the parameters of solution (19) and solve again.

Suppose that

which can be rewritten as

where \( \begin{array}{{c}} {{\xi _1} = {k_1}x - {\omega _1}}t, \end{array} + {c_1}\), \(G = \frac{{1/({\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } {\xi _1}) + \cos {\theta _1}}}{{{k_1}M\sin {\theta _1}}}\), \({a_0}\), *a* and *M* are constants to be determined.

Substituting Eq. (30) into Eq. (1), we obtain

Further simplification of Eq. (31) yields:

Collecting all terms with the powers in \({{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^{ - n}}\xi (n = 0,1,2,3)\) and setting each of the obtained coeffificients for \({{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^{ - n}}\xi \) to zero yields the following set of algebraic equations with respect to \({a_0}, {k_1}, {\omega _1}, \alpha , \beta , {\theta _1}\) and *M* :

Solving Eqs. (33)–(36), we obtain the following solutions:

Case (i):

The travelling wave solution of KdV–MKdV equation are given by

(a) When \({\theta _1} = \pi /2\), then

where \({\omega _1} = \gamma k_1^2,\,{\xi _1} = {k_1}x - {\omega _1}t + {c_1}\).

(b) When \({\theta _1} \rightarrow 0\), then

where \({\omega _1} = \gamma k_1^2,\,{\xi _1} = {k_1}x - {\omega _1}t + {c_1}\).

Case (ii): \(\omega = - \gamma k_1^2 - \frac{1}{3}\beta a_0^2,\frac{\alpha }{2} + \beta {a_0} = 3\gamma k_1^2\frac{{\cos {\theta _1}}}{{{k_1}M\sin {\theta _1}}}, \gamma \left( {\frac{{2{{\cos }^2}{\theta _1}}}{{{M^2}{{\sin }^2}{\theta _1}}} - \frac{2}{{{M^2}{{\sin }^2}\theta }}} \right) + \frac{\beta }{3} = 0\), then

where \(\omega = - \gamma k_1^2 - \frac{1}{3}\beta a_0^2,\,{\xi _1} = {k_1}x - {\omega _1}t + {c_1}\).

(a) When \({\theta _1} = \pi /2\), then \({a_0} = - \frac{\alpha }{{2\beta }},M = \pm \sqrt{\frac{{6\gamma }}{\beta }} \), we obtain

where

(b) When \({\theta _1} \rightarrow 0\), then

where

## The linear stability of solitary wave solutions of \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type

The Split-Step Fourier Transform (SSFT) method is a pseudospectral numerical technique utilized for solving nonlinear partial differential equations. This method involves computing the solution in incremental steps. It handles dispersive and nonlinear effects independently through a sequential approach: first addressing the nonlinear effects and then the dispersive effects.

In this section, we will use the split-step Fourier transform (SSFT) method^{27} to study the linear stability of single and multiple \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves in equation (1). To this end, we use the waveform of a \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave (refer to solution (40) or (44)) at time *t*=0 (selecting waveforms at other times is also acceptable and does not affect the analysis results) with a perturbation of a random uniformly distributed noise field of amplitude \(10^{-4}\) as the initial condition. By observing the changes in perturbations over time, we can determine the stability of the solitary wave. If the perturbations are suppressed, the solitary wave is stable; if the perturbations increase exponentially, the solitary wave is unstable^{27,28,29,30}.

Solution (28) is obtained under \({\theta _1} \rightarrow 0\) , but a key issue is that the wave number \(k_1\) must be very large to ensure the validity of the solution. Therefore, we solved Equation (1) again and obtained Solution (40) or (44), which ensures a reasonable value for \(k_1\).

Based on the above reasons, it is reasonable to use \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves as the input signal without considering the dispersion relationship to study the stability of solitary waves.

Figure 1 illustrates the stability analysis of the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave \(u_D = D{{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^2}\left( {(1.3x - 10.7367t + 5)/2} \right) \) (selected based on the solitary wave solution (40)) using SSFT method in Eq. (1) with \(\alpha = - 6,\,\beta = 6\, \mathrm{{and \,}} \gamma = 4.887\). We assume an initial excitation which is the displacement field from \(u_D\) at time *t* = 0 with a uniformly distributed random perturbation of amplitude \(10^{-4}\)^{27,28}. The parameter D gradually increased with values of − 0.3380, − 1.014, − 1, − 2.535, and − 3.4983.

Figure 1a shows a stable train of solitary waves excited by a \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave as the initial condition, with nearly thirty solitary waves from left to right, gradually decreasing in amplitude. From the perspective of energy conservation, the waveform of the solitary wave with the maximum amplitude (on the far left) no longer maintains a \(\text{Sech}^{2}\) shape. Therefore, although we used a \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave as the initial condition, stable \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves were not excited.

Relative to Fig. 1a, the solitary waves in the stable train shown in Fig. 1b not only exhibit reduced amplitude variations but also decrease in number. The amplitude of the excited solitary wave (on the far left, with the maximum amplitude) in Fig. 1b more closely resembles a \(\text{Sech}^{2}\) waveform.

The stable solitary wave excited in Fig. 1c does not show any changes compared to the initial waveform, clearly indicating the excitation of a \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary wave.

Relative to Fig. 1a,b, the stable solitary wave excited in Fig. 1d (on the far left) has a larger amplitude, and the train of solitary waves in Fig. 1d contains fewer solitary waves with smaller amplitudes. It is evident that the solitary wave excited in Fig. 1d does not exhibit a standard \(\text{Sech}^{2}\) shape. However, it is a stable solitary wave.

In Fig. 1e, we can see the initial solitary wave splitting into two solitary waves. Before \(t=3.5\), both of these solitary waves maintain stable propagation. However, at \(t=3.5\), the solitary wave on the left suddenly increases in amplitude and changes direction. It is evident from the figure that stable solitary waves were not excited.

In Eq. (1), the amplitude of the solitary wave is a factor that affects the stability as shown in Fig. 1. It can be observed that for the same solitary wave, as the wave amplitude increases gradually, the solitary wave becomes stable initially. However, with further continuous increase in wave amplitude, the solitary wave begins to become unstable.

We use the conclusion from Ref.^{29}, “the double-soliton is inspired by the elastic collision of two single-solitons”, to construct a \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type double solitary wave.

To study the stability of \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type double solitary waves, we examine the collision of the following two single-soliton waves with different amplitudes: \(u_{D1} = - 1.21{{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^2}\left( {0.5(x - 4.887t -10)} \right) \) and \(u_{D2} = - 1.69{{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^2}\left( {0.5(1.3x - 10.7367t+5)} \right) \) at time \(t = -2\), subjected to a uniformly distributed random perturbation of amplitude \(10^{-4}\). The simulation results are presented in Fig. 1a.

In the same way, we use three \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves \(u_{D1}\) , \(u_{D2}\) and \(u_{D3} = - 1.8{{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^2}\left( {0.5(1.3x - 10.7367t+5)+10} \right) \)to generate triple solitary waves, use four \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves \(u_{D1}\), \(u_{D2}\), \(u_{D3}\) and \(u_{D4} = - 2.1{{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^2}\left( {0.5(1.3x - 10.7367t+35)} \right) \) to generate quadruple solitary waves, and use five \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves \(u_{D1}\), \(u_{D2}\), \(u_{D3}\), \(u_{D4}\) and \(u_{D5} = - 1.21{{\mathop {\text{ s ech}}\nolimits } ^2}\left( {0.5(x - 4.887t -20)} \right) \) to generate quintuple solitary waves.

Figure 2a shows stable \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type double-solitary waves excited by the interaction of the initial single solitary waves \( u_{D_1} \) and \( u_{D_2} \). It is evident that the amplitudes of \( u_{D_1} \) and \( u_{D_2} \) do not change, indicating that the excited double solitary waves are of the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\) type. Figure 2b utilizes the same method as Fig. 2a, using the interaction of single solitary waves \( u_{D_1} \), \( u_{D_2} \), and \( u_{D_3} \) to excite triple solitary waves. It is easy to see from the figure that stable triple solitary waves of the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type are excited. Figure 3 shows the stable quadruple solitary and quintuple solitary waves excited using the same method as in Fig. 2. Of course, if the initial conditions are chosen improperly, unstable multiple solitary waves may also be excited.

## Conclusion

This paper investigates the solitary wave solutions of the nonlinear KdV–MKdV equation using the Hirota’s bilinear method, focusing on both single solitary wave solutions and multiple solitary wave solutions. We know that the nonlinear terms of the KdV and mKdV equations often coexist in certain physical systems, such as fluid dynamics and quantum field theory, giving rise to the KdV–mKdV equation. Interestingly, in the general KdV equation, exact solitary wave solutions of the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type exist, whereas in the mKdV equation, exact solitary wave solutions of the sech-type are present. The KdV–mKdV equation supports exact solitary wave solutions of the sech-type but does not support general exact solitary wave solutions of the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type. Therefore, investigating the existence and stability of solitary waves of the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type, both single and multiple, is of significant importance.

In the limit of analytic solutions, the \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves can be obtained. However, this limitation requires a very large wave number. To obtain general \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves, this paper re-solves the KdV–mKdV equation using the method of trial functions, resulting in general \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves. Additionally, the propagation stability of single and multiple \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves is analyzed and simulated using the SSFT, leading to stable single and multiple solitary waves.

This paper analyzes the impact of solitary wave amplitude on stability, finding that smaller amplitudes result in a train of solitary waves. As the amplitude increases, this train of solitary waves gradually disappears. Interestingly, when the amplitude reaches a certain level, \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves are produced. Further increasing the amplitude causes perturbations to be exponentially amplified, which disrupts the solitary wave shape and leads to instability. Although we found stable \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type single and multiple solitary waves, our study revealed that the unstable solitary wave scenarios are very complex and may lead to rogue waves, bifurcations and chaos^{31,32,33,34}. This will be the focus of our further research.

## Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

## References

Li, X. & Wang, M. A sub-ODE method for finding exact solutions of a generalized KdV–mKdV equation with high-order nonlinear terms.

*Phys. Lett. A***361**, 115–118 (2007).Wazwaz, A.-M.

*Partial Differential Equations and Solitary Waves Theory*(Springer, 2010).Bekir, A. On traveling wave solutions to combined KdV–mKdV equation and modified Burgers–KdV equation.

*Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.***14**, 1038–1042 (2009).Mohamad, M. Exact solutions to the combined KdV and mKdV equation.

*Math. Methods Appl. Sci.***15**, 73–78 (1992).Wadati, M. Wave propagation in nonlinear lattice. I.

*J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.***38**, 673–680 (1975).Novikov, S., Manakov, S. V., Pitaevskii, L. P. & Zakharov, V. E.

*Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method*(Springer, 1984).Lu, D. & Liu, C. A sub-ODE method for generalized Gardner and BBM equation with nonlinear terms of any order.

*Appl. Math. Comput.***217**, 1404–1407 (2010).Parkes, E. & Duffy, B. An automated tanh-function method for finding solitary wave solutions to non-linear evolution equations.

*Comput. Phys. Commun.***98**, 288–300 (1996).Leble, S. & Ustinov, N. Korteweg-de Vries-modified Korteweg-de Vries systems and Darboux transforms in 1+ 1 and 2+ 1 dimensions.

*J. Math. Phys.***34**, 1421–1428 (1993).Olver, P. J.

*Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations*Vol. 107 (Springer, 1993).Ablowitz, M. J. & Clarkson, P. A.

*Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering*Vol. 149 (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Wang, M. Solitary wave solutions for variant Boussinesq equations.

*Phys. Lett. A***199**, 169–172 (1995).Hirota, R. & Satsuma, J. Soliton solutions of a coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation.

*Phys. Lett. A***85**, 407–408 (1981).Seadawy, A. R., Arshad, M. & Lu, D. The weakly nonlinear wave propagation theory for the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in magnetohydrodynamics flows.

*Chaos Solitons Fractals***139**, 110141 (2020).Roshid, H.-O. Novel solitary wave solution in shallow water and ion acoustic plasma waves in-terms of two nonlinear models via MSE method.

*J. Ocean Eng. Sci.***2**, 196–202 (2017).Miura, R. M. Korteweg-de Vries equation and generalizations. I. A remarkable explicit nonlinear transformation.

*J. Math. Phys.***9**, 1202–1204 (1968).Taha, T. R. Numerical simulation of the KdV–mKdV equation.

*Int. J. Mod. Phys. C***5**, 407–410 (1994).Fu, Z., Liu, S. & Liu, S. New kinds of solutions to Gardner equation.

*Chaos Solitons Fractals***20**, 301–309 (2004).Krishnan, E. & Peng, Y.-Z. Exact solutions to the combined KdV–mKdV equation by the extended mapping method.

*Phys. Scr.***73**, 405 (2006).Pelinovsky, E., Polukhina, O., Slunyaev, A. & Talipova, T. Internal solitary waves.

*Solitary Waves Fluids***47**, 85 (2007).Wazwaz, A.-M. Solitons and singular solitons for the Gardner–KP equation.

*Appl. Math. Comput.***204**, 162–169 (2008).Wang, K.-J., Shi, F., Liu, J.-H. & Si, J. Application of the extended F-expansion method for solving the fractional Gardner equation with conformable fractional derivative.

*Fractals***30**, 2250139 (2022).Lu, D. & Shi, Q. New solitary wave solutions for the combined KdV–mKdV equation.

*J. Inf. Comput. Sci.***8**, 1733–1737 (2010).Zhang, J. New solitary wave solution of the combined KdV and mKdV equation.

*Int. J. Theor. Phys.***37**, 1541–1546 (1998).Fan, E. Uniformly constructing a series of explicit exact solutions to nonlinear equations in mathematical physics.

*Chaos Solitons Fractals***16**, 819–839 (2003).Yuan, R.-R., Shi, Y., Zhao, S.-L. & Zhao, J.-X. The combined KdV–mKdV equation: Bilinear approach and rational solutions with free multi-parameters.

*Results Phys.***55**, 107188 (2023).Agrawal, G. P. Nonlinear fiber optics. In

*Nonlinear Science at the Dawn of the 21st Century*(ed. Agrawal, G. P.) 195–211 (Springer, 2000).Trillo, S. & Torruellas, W.

*Spatial Solitons*Vol. 82 (Springer, 2013).Liu, Z.-G., Wang, Y.-S. & Huang, G. Solitary waves in a granular chain of elastic spheres: Multiple solitary solutions and their stabilities.

*Phys. Rev. E***99**, 062904 (2019).Liu, Z.-G., Zhang, J., Wang, Y.-S. & Huang, G. Analytical solutions of solitary waves and their collision stability in a pre-compressed one-dimensional granular crystal.

*Nonlinear Dyn.***104**, 4293–4309 (2021).Ullah, M. S., Ali, M. Z. & Roshid, H.-O. Bifurcation analysis and new waveforms to the first fractional WBBM equation.

*Sci. Rep.***14**, 11907 (2024).Abdeljabbar, A., Hossen, M. B., Roshid, H.-O. & Aldurayhim, A. Interactions of rogue and solitary wave solutions to the (2+ 1)-D generalized Camassa–Holm–KP equation.

*Nonlinear Dyn.***110**, 3671–3683 (2022).Wu, Q. & Qi, G. Homoclinic bifurcations and chaotic dynamics of non-planar waves in axially moving beam subjected to thermal load.

*Appl. Math. Model.***83**, 674–682 (2020).Seydel, R.

*Practical Bifurcation and Stability Analysis*Vol. 5 (Springer, 2009).

## Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62102134), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2023M741041).

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Contributions

L.Z.G. carried out numerical simulations, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. L.M.H. contributed to the discussion and paper writing. Z.J.L. contributed to the data analysis and paper writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Additional information

### Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Liu, ZG., Liu, M. & Zhang, J. \(\text{Sech}^{2}\)-type solitary waves and the stability analysis for the KdV–mKdV equation.
*Sci Rep* **14**, 16315 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67317-x

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67317-x

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.