Abstract
Many ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals, like one of the archetype materials, DIO, do not have a direct paraelectric N to ferroelectric NF phase transition, but exhibit yet another phase between N and NF. This phase has recently been proposed to be antiferroelectric, with a layered structure of alternating polarization normal to the average director and is sometimes referred to as Smectic ZA (SmZA). We have examined the SmZA phase in circularly rubbed (CR) cells, known to discriminate between the polar NF and the non-polar N phase from the configuration of disclination lines formed. We find that the ground state of SmZA has the same disclination configuration as the non-polar N phase, demonstrating that the SmZA phase is also non-polar, i.e., it has no net ferroelectric polarization. At the same time, the SmZA texture generally has a grainy appearance, which we suggest is partly a result of the frustration related to layered order combined with the imposed twist in CR cells. We discuss possible orientations of the smectic layers, depending on the alignment conditions. While a horizontal SmZA layer structure is always compatible with surface-induced twist, a vertical layer structure would tend to break up in a twisted bookshelf structure to match non-parallel alignment directions at the two surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The simplest form of liquid crystal—the nematic phase N—is a three-dimensional uniaxial anisotropic fluid, oriented along the local symmetry axis described with the director n. N is non-polar, which means that n is invariant under sign inversion, i.e., +n = –n, cf. Fig. 1a. In 2017, Mandle et al.1 and Nishikawa et al2 reported liquid crystals of highly polar molecules (RM734 and DIO, respectively) that seemed to exhibit more than one nematic phase, some of which appeared to defy the sign-invariance of n. This means that they ought to be, at least locally, spontaneously polar. Later Chen et al. presented evidence3 that RM734, originally synthesized and studied by Mandle1,4,5,6, indeed exhibits a ferroelectric nematic phase (NF) with a spontaneous electric polarization P, cf. Fig. 1b. The NF phase of RM734 is perfectly miscible with, and therefore also identical to, the lowest temperature range nematic phase in DIO3,7. Ferroelectric nematics today constitute an intense field of research1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41 (so far about 150 NF materials have been reported23,42,43) but the mechanisms behind spontaneously polarized nematics are still not fully understood. Especially, this holds true for the additional phase, originally called M2, located between the NF phase and the N phase in the archetype NF material DIO2.
The structure and polar nature of this M2 phase have since been studied intensely by several groups8,28,35,45. In 2021, at the ferroelectric liquid crystal conference in Ljubljana, Slovenia, Clark reported evidence that this phase in fact has antiferroelectric order, with “layers” of alternating polarization directions (Fig. 1c)46. The periodicity of the layered phase was revealed by the electron density variation between splayed and non-splayed regions probed using synchrotron based small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) by Clark et al.45 and later by Cruichshank et al.35. The period of the alternating polarization field is two times the period of the electron density modulation. As the phase is “layered” it was pointed out that it is in fact a smectic material and the phase was coined Smectic ZA (SmZA)45,46. The SAXS experiments further showed that the “layer thickness” in SmZA of DIO is about 10 nm, corresponding to about 20 molecular widths. In comparison, in the NF phase ferroelectric syn-polar domains span several micrometers6. Importantly, over multiple layers the antipolar arrangement of polar nematic substructures, restores a sign inversion invariance in the SmZA phase and there should be no global ferroelectric polarization. This was confirmed via dielectric measurements by Brown et al.8 and Erkoreka et al.47. Interestingly, the antiferroelectric structure of SmZA might mediate the transition from the conventional paraelectric nematic to the ferroelectric nematic phase.
Conventional rubbed polyimide surfaces provide in-plane polar anchoring of the NF phase10,15. In sandwich cells with antiparallel rubbing on the two surfaces, the NF therefore tends to form ± 180° twisted states, with the same probability for right-, and left-handed twist. This is in stark contrast to the non-polar N phase, where no twist occurs for antiparallel nor for parallel rubbing conditions. If the two surfaces are rubbed in a linear, and a circular fashion, respectively (circularly rubbed cells, CR cells), the N and NF, or rather nonpolar and polar nematics, can easily be distinguished from the characteristic disclination lines formed, cf. Fig. 215.
The CR cell-method for identification of N and NF phases is described in ref.15 and in Fig. 2. In short, in a CR cell the conventional N makes two disclination lines, from the center of circular rubbing along the two radii where the mutual rubbing directions are orthogonal (position 9 and 3 on a clock face). At these disclinations the director twist jumps from + 90° to −90° to minimize the twist elastic energy. Everywhere else in the CR cell, there is a continuous twist with different magnitude between the surfaces. In the NF phase, due to the in-plane polar surface anchoring and the bulk polar order of the phase, there is instead one disclination line, in the direction where the mutual rubbing directions are antiparallel (position 6). At this single disclination line the twist jumps from + 180° to −180°.
Here we use the CR cell-method to study the polar nature of the SmZA phase in DIO. We find that the ground state of SmZA has the same two-line defect configuration as the conventional N phase, in agreement with the proposed macroscopically non-polar structure of SmZA. Furthermore, the CR cell geometry gives information about the orientation of the SmZA layers in relation to the mutual rubbing directions, as all combinations of rubbing angles are represented in the same CR cell. Parallel as well as and antiparallel rubbing directions allow for the layers to form normal to (bookshelf orientation) or parallel (planar orientation) to the surfaces. Non-parallel rubbing, on the other hand, is obviously incompatible with a bookshelf layer structure (cf. SI Fig. S1), and should instead promote planar orientation of the layers, which inherently allows for a director twist normal to the plates, or force the SmZA structure to break up into a broken helix structure of azimuthally shifted blocks of SmZA. (SI Fig. S2). This would constitute a twisted bookshelf comparable to a twist grain boundary (TGB)-like structure known from some chiral smectics48.
Results and discussion
Figure 3 shows a 4 µm thick CR cell filled with DIO between crossed polarizers in the optical microscope. The cell was first cooled down from the isotropic phase at a rate of 1 K/min. At the transition to N (T = 172 °C) a characteristic smooth texture with two disclination lines at 9 and at 3 o'clock was immediately produced (right). On further cooling at 1 K/min (Fig. 3, bottom path) the texture changed at T = 83 °C to a microdomain, grainy texture, with a characteristic domain size of about 5–10 μm estimated from the optical microscope image. We suggest this change in texture corresponds to the N–SmZA transition. Importantly, in the SmZA the two distinct disclination lines remained at 9 and at 3 o'clock (Fig. 3, bottom), i.e., in the identical disclination configuration as in the smooth N-texture, despite the grainy microdomain features of the SmZA phase.
On further cooling at 1 K/min, the transition from SmZA to NF occurred at T = 69 °C, at which the microdomain structure disappeared and a smooth texture with only one disclination was formed, characteristic of a polar NF phase (left image of Fig. 3). However, reheating with a higher rate of 10 K/min from NF into the SmZA phase (Fig. 3, top path) yielded an unexpected scenario. The single disclination line texture from the previous NF phase was now maintained in the SmZA phase, giving the impression of a polar structure. On further heating at a rate of 0.5 K/min the singular disclination line then split up into two upon transitioning into the N phase at T = 83 °C cf. the upper path in Fig. 3.
To further understand the formed textures, one must consider the possible orientation of the director throughout the whole cell. In Fig. 4 vertical cylindrical cuts, coaxial with the circular rubbing are unrolled, so that on both ends of the cell the position 12 is seen (the cylindrical cut is visualized in SI Video S2). In between, positions 3, 6, and 9 o'clock are passed in that order, so that six is in the middle of the drawing. Furthermore, the different alignment cases, depending on the phase and history of the cell are depicted mimicking the positions of Fig. 3. In the case of the non-layered structures (N and NF), the director is free to twist, matching the local rubbing directions as previously described. However, the layered, antipolar, structure of the SmZA is more complex to match with the twisted alignment conditions. If the layers form parallel to the surface (horizontal configuration), a surface-induced twist does not impair the layering and is thus allowed. One could then speculate that the in-plane polarity of the boundary conditions come into play, which means that in the single disclination line SmZA case, the number of layers must be odd, so that the parallel rubbing direction at position 12 is satisfied by the polarization vectors. In principle the same number of layers can be kept in the whole CR cell, matching the local boundary conditions everywhere. However, in the two disclination line case, the antiparallel rubbing at position 6 and the lines at 3 and 9 force the number of layers to be changed to an even number, since an odd number of layers would mismatch one of the alignment conditions (cf. SI Video S3 and Fig. 5). But as the cell gap is 4 µm and one polar layer is about 10 nm thick, we argue this is not important; To match the boundary conditions, the decrease/increase in SmZA layer thickness would be only 0.3% resulting in a negligible change in twist elastic energy. In other words, the planar layer antiferroelectric structure of SmZA can always adapt to the (polar) boundary conditions, and the configuration with a minimum amount of necessary twist will form.
An important observation is that when the sample is instead left in the SmZA after heating from the NF phase, the initial single vertical disclination line at 9 o'clock slowly splits into two horizontal lines approaching 9 and 3 o'clock over a period of about 24 h (see Fig. 6). Considering the opposite approach via cooling, the initial two-disclination line texture is preserved over a longer period of time with no visible changes. This shows that the ground state of the SmZA is indeed the two-line configuration, while the one-line configuration is metastable. A similar metastable one defect line configuration in CR cells also might appear in conventional non-polar nematics, but only as a transient phenomenon, e.g. if they are electrically switched to the homeotropic state before the field is switched off. Then the nematic first relaxes into the one-line configuration, but immediately thereafter splits up in the stable two-line configuration, showing that the latter is the ground state, see SI Video S1. It is easy to understand why the two-line configuration has lower elastic energy than the on-line configuration. In the former, the twist ranges from 0 to ± 90° in both halves of the cell, while in the latter, one half of the cell has a twist from 0 to ± 90° while the other half has a higher twist, ranging from ± 90°to ± 180°. This makes it obvious, that the elastically favored ground state is the two disclination state. Hence, in DIO the one-line configuration in CR cells is inherited from the lower temperature NF phase. We suggest that the slow dynamics of the relaxation, and the motion of the disclination lines, from the metastable one-line state to the two-line ground state is due to the high effective viscosity of the layered SmZA phase. Thus, there is no net ferroelectric polarization in the one-line metastable state of SmZA; the rapid phase transition from ferroelectric NF to antiferroelectric SmZA, is followed by the much slower transition from the one-, to the two-line configuration. The latter is only a structural change, not a change in the polar order. The SmZA phase is always nonpolar.
Let us now focus on the irregularities of the SmZA texture, cf. Figs. 3, 6. It has been reported that the SmZA phase often display a less smooth, even referred to as “furry”2, texture than both the N and NF phases. The fact that the SmZA can adopt either bookshelf or planar alignment of the layers for parallel and antiparallel rubbing of the polymer alignment layers45 shows that the in-plane polar anchoring tendency has little or no effect on the alignment of the macroscopically nonpolar SmZA.
Figure 7 shows a 4 μm thick CR cell in the SmZA phase after cooling from the N phase. The cell is rotated so the linear rubbing direction makes about 45° with the horizontal direction, i.e., from lower left to upper right. In the regions where the circular and linear rubbing directions are essentially parallel or antiparallel (i.e. at 12 and at 6 o’clock) a well-aligned texture with blue birefringence color is obtained. In some CR cells we observed zig-zag-like defects in these regions (cf. SI Fig. S4), indicating the presence of a chevron-structure, as discussed in detail by Chen et al.45. We therefore suggest these regions approximately display a bookshelf or vertical chevron structure. Away from these regions the mutual rubbing directions deviate more and more from each other, and hence, the boundary conditions can no longer support a well-defined bookshelf structure. The material should now have two options; to break up in a broken twisted structure with azimuthally shifted blocks of SmZA (cf. SI Fig. S2), or to instead reorient to make the layers parallel to the surfaces, cf. Figure 4. At large angles between the two rubbing directions one could then expect a more irregular, domain-like texture, where the domain boundaries could be a result of a mix of horizontal layer regions and different amounts of domains with layers in the vertical direction, and/or broken twisted layer structures. In Fig. 6j–l, at 9 and at 3ʹ, a fuzzy, unsharp texture is observed, with a certain resemblance of smectic TGB textures. This could be an indication that broken twisted structures also occur in SmZA, as one could speculate that both such broken twisted structures could have similar optical characteristics. If there is, at least locally, a twisted bookshelf SmZA structure one could at this stage only speculate regarding the structure in the boundaries between the azimuthally shifted SmZA blocks. One option could be that the material adopts a nematic (N) phase in the boundary regions to mediate a twist between blocks. An analogous case was in fact reported by Ruan et al.49, who studied twisted nematic cells undergoing the transition to smectic A on cooling. They found that below the N to smectic A transition the material SCE13 formed one or more blocks of uniform smectic A, separated by a twisted nematic region with two twisted nematic boundary regions. In addition to this “melted” twisted grain boundary model, one could contemplate a more complex SmZA structure, where the boundaries do not melt but instead contain a set of equally spaced dispirations, i.e., unit screw-dislocations, combined with half-unit disclinations. A similar structure has been proposed in relation to a hypothetical antiferroelectric TGB smectic Ca* phase50.
In conclusion, based on CR cell experiments, we find that the SmZA phase is macroscopically non-polar, in agreement with the conclusions of Chen et al.45. At this stage our discussion about layer orientation in CR cells is somewhat speculative. Furthermore, we suggest that the SmZA phase may orient with standing and/or planar layers on rubbed polymer surfaces. Bookshelf alignment should be allowed for close to parallel and/or antiparallel rubbing. For non-parallel rubbing, planar layers should be preferred as this geometry allows for a defect free twist, even though an energetically more costly broken twisted configuration of SmZA blocks with vertical layers could be allowed in principle.
Methods
Materials
The liquid crystalline materials, DIO and AUUQU-2-N, were provided by Merck. The synthesis of DIO can be found for example in8. The synthesis of AUUQU-2-N is described in the patent DE 103 53 658 A1 2004 06 09. The phase sequence for both molecules is as follows:
AUUQU-2-N: Iso—128°C–N—83°C–SmZA—69°C–NF—55°C–Cr
DIO: Iso—174°C–N—83°C–SmZA—69°C–NF—34°C–Cr
Both are represented in cooling sequences, as the NF and SmZA are monotropic in nature.
Polarized optical microscopy
CR cells with cell gaps of 4 μm were filled with DIO, in the isotropic phase by means of capillary filling in the isotropic phase. Phase transition temperatures, textures and alignment were investigated with a Leica DM 2700 P polarized light microscope, equipped with an Instec heating stage HCS302 controlled by a mk1000 temperature unit. The pictures were taken by a pixeLink video camera. The videos were captured with the software OBS.
Circularly rubbed cells
Clean ITO-coated three square inch sodalime glass plates of thickness 1.1 mm were spin-coated with polyimide PI2610 (DuPont) (5%) at 5000 rps for 30 s, and subsequently baked in an oven at 300° for 3 h. For linear rubbing, a commercial rubbing machine (LCTec Automation) was used. For circular rubbing we used a commercial, simple pillar drill, with a flat chuck covered with a piece of rubbing cloth (velvet). The rotating chuck was gently pressed onto the substrate for a few seconds. On each substrate we made 25 zones of circular rubbing, in a 5 × 5 array. UV-hardening glue containing 4 μm silica spacers was dispensed on the linearly rubbed plate using an in-house built computer-controlled dispenser. Thereafter, one linearly and one circularly rubbed substrate were assembled together using a commercial substrate assembling machine (Ciposa), and the glue was cured while pressing the substrates together. Each assembly was cut in 25 CR cells. The cells were capillary filled with liquid crystal in the isotropic phase. For the experiments reported here, we did not make use of the ITO electrodes.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Should any raw data files be needed in another format they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Mandle, R. J., Cowling, S. J. & Goodby, J. W. A nematic to nematic transformation exhibited by a rod-like liquid crystal. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 11429–11435 (2017).
Nishikawa, H. et al. A fluid liquid-crystal material with highly polar order. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702354 (2017).
Chen, X. et al. First-principles experimental demonstration of ferroelectricity in a thermotropic nematic liquid crystal: Polar domains and striking electro-optics. PNAS 117, 14021–14031 (2020).
Mandle, R. J., Cowling, S. J. & Goodby, J. W. Rational design of rod-like liquid crystals exhibiting two nematic phases. Chem. Eur. 23, 14554–14562 (2017).
Mertelj, A. et al. Splay nematic phase. Phys. Rev. X 8, 41025 (2018).
Sebastián, N. et al. Ferroelectric-ferroelastic phase transition in a nematic liquid crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 37801 (2020).
Chen, X. et al. Ideal mixing of paraelectric and ferroelectric nematic phases in liquid crystals of distinct molecular species. Liq. Cryst. 49, 1531–1544 (2022).
Brown, S. et al. Multiple polar and non-polar nematic phases. Chemphyschem 22, 2506–2510 (2021).
Caimi, F. et al. Surface alignment of ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals. Soft Matter 17, 8130–8139 (2021).
Chen, X. et al. Polar in-plane surface orientation of a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal: Polar monodomains and twisted state electro-optics. PNAS 118, e2104092118 (2021).
Kats, E. I. Combined defects in ferroelectric nematics. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 132, 641–644 (2021).
Madhusudana, N. V. Simple molecular model for ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals exhibited by small rodlike mesogens. Phys. Rev. E 104, 14704 (2021).
Mandle, R. J., Cowling, S. J. & Goodby, J. W. Structural variants of RM734 in the design of splay nematic materials. Liq. Cryst. 48, 1780–1790 (2021).
Mandle, R. J., Sebastián, N., Martinez-Perdiguero, J. & Mertelj, A. On the molecular origins of the ferroelectric splay nematic phase. Nat. Commun. 12, 4962 (2021).
Rudquist, P. Revealing the polar nature of a ferroelectric nematic by means of circular alignment. Sci. Rep. 11, 24411 (2021).
Sebastián, N., Mandle, R. J., Petelin, A., Eremin, A. & Mertelj, A. Electrooptics of mm-scale polar domains in the ferroelectric nematic phase. Liq. Cryst. 48, 2055–2071 (2021).
Zhao, X. et al. Spontaneous helielectric nematic liquid crystals: Electric analog to helimagnets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111101118 (2021).
Basnet, B. et al. Soliton walls paired by polar surface interactions in a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal. Nat. Commun. 13, 3932 (2022).
Cruickshank, E., Walker, R., Storey, J. M. D. & Imrie, C. T. The effect of a lateral alkyloxy chain on the ferroelectric nematic phase. RSC Adv. 12, 29482–29490 (2022).
Emelyanenko, A. V. et al. Emergence of paraelectric, improper antiferroelectric, and proper ferroelectric nematic phases in a liquid crystal composed of polar molecules. Phys. Rev. E https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.064701 (2022).
Kikuchi, H. et al. Fluid layered ferroelectrics with global C∞v symmetry. Adv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202202048 (2022).
Long, H., Li, J., Huang, M. & Aya, S. Mixing-induced phase stabilization and low-temperature-shifting of ferroelectric nematics. Liq. Cryst. 49, 2121–2127 (2022).
Mandle, R. J. A new order of liquids: Polar order in nematic liquid crystals. Soft Matter https://doi.org/10.1039/d2sm00543c (2022).
Mandle, R. J. Implementation of a cylindrical distribution function for the analysis of anisotropic molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS One 17, e0279679 (2022).
Máthé, M. T., Buka, Á., Jákli, A. & Salamon, P. Ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal thermomotor. Phys. Rev. E 105, L052701 (2022).
Nazarenko, K. G. et al. Chiral ferronematic liquid crystals: A physico-chemical analysis of phase transitions and induced helical twisting. Liq. Cryst. 50, 98–109 (2022).
Nishikawa, H. et al. Nano-clustering mediates phase transitions in a diastereomerically-stabilized ferroelectric nematic system. Commun. Mater. 3, 89 (2022).
Saha, R. et al. Multiple ferroelectric nematic phases of a highly polar liquid crystal compound. Liq. Cryst. 49, 1784–1796 (2022).
Sebastián, N., Čopič, M. & Mertelj, A. Ferroelectric nematic liquid-crystalline phases. Phys. Rev. E 106, 21001 (2022).
Song, Y. et al. Development of emergent ferroelectric nematic liquid crystals with highly fluorinated and rigid mesogens. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 11536–11543 (2022).
Yang, J. et al. Spontaneous electric-polarization topology in confined ferroelectric nematics. Nat. Commun. 13, 7806 (2022).
Zhou, J., Xia, R., Huang, M. & Aya, S. Stereoisomer effect on ferroelectric nematics: Stabilization and phase behavior diversification. J. Mater. Chem. C 10, 8762–8766 (2022).
Barthakur, A., Karcz, J., Kula, P. & Dhara, S. Critical splay fluctuations and colossal flexoelectric effect above the nonpolar to polar nematic phase transition. Phys. Rev. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.035603 (2023).
Parton-Barr, C., Gleeson, H. & Mandle, R. Room-temperature ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal showing a large and divergent density. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.14161 (2023).
Cruickshank, E. et al. To be or not to be polar: The ferroelectric and antiferroelectric nematic phases. ACS Omega 8, 36562–36568 (2023).
Kumar, M. P., Karcz, J., Kula, P., Karmakar, S. & Dhara, S. Giant electroviscous effects in a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal. Phys. Rev. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.044082 (2023).
Mandle, R. J. In silico interactome of a room-temperature ferroelectric nematic material. Crystals 13, 857 (2023).
Máthé, M. T. et al. Electric field-induced interfacial instability in a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal. Sci. Rep. 13, 6981 (2023).
Matsukizono, H. et al. Synthesis of liquid crystals bearing 1,3-dioxane structures and characterization of their ferroelectricity in the nematic phase. J. Mater. Chem. C 11, 6183–6190 (2023).
Nakasugi, S. et al. Three distinct polar phases, isotropic, nematic, and smectic-a phases, formed from a fluoro-substituted dimeric molecule with large dipole moment. J. Phys. Chem. B 127, 6585–6595 (2023).
Sebastián, N. et al. Polarization patterning in ferroelectric nematic liquids via flexoelectric coupling. Nat. Commun. 14, 3029 (2023).
Li, J. et al. Development of ferroelectric nematic fluids with giant-ε dielectricity and nonlinear optical properties. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf5047 (2021).
Cruickshank, E. The emergence of a polar nematic phase: A chemist’s insight into the ferroelectric nematic phase. ChemPlusChem 89, e202300726 (2024).
Nacke, P. et al. New examples of ferroelectric nematic materials showing evidence for the antiferroelectric smectic-Z phase. Sci. Rep. 14, 4473 (2024).
Chen, X. et al. The smectic ZA phase: Antiferroelectric smectic order as a prelude to the ferroelectric nematic. PNAS 120, e2217150120 (2023).
Noel A. Clark. Antiferroelectric Smectic Ordering as a Prelude to the Ferroelectric Nematic: Introducing the Smectic Z Phase. (2021).
Erkoreka, A. et al. Collective and non-collective molecular dynamics in a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal studied by broadband dielectric spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173813 (2023).
Goodby, J. W. et al. Characterization of a new helical smectic liquid crystal. Nature 337, 449–452 (1989).
Ruan, L. Z., Osipov, M. A. & Sambles, J. R. Coexisting nematic and smectic-A phases in a twisted liquid-crystal cell. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4548–4551 (2001).
Meier, J. G., Rudquist, P., Petrenko, A. S., Goodby, J. W. & Lagerwall, S. T. The antiferroelectric TGB phase: Textures, field-induced effects and microscopic model. Liq. Cryst. 29, 179–189 (2002).
Acknowledgements
P.R. was partly financed by the Swedish Research Council, Grant No 2023-04853.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.N., P.R., and F.G. proposed and designed experiments; P.N. and P.R. performed and analyzed the experiments; R.T. and M.K.-M. synthesized and provided the new materials; P.N., R.T., M.K.-M., P.R. and F.G. analyzed the data and discussed the results; and P.N., and P.R. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nacke, P., Tuffin, R., Klasen-Memmer, M. et al. Revealing the antipolar order in the antiferroelectric SmZA phase by means of circular alignment. Sci Rep 14, 15018 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65275-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65275-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.