Analysis of endoscopic and pathological features of 6961 cases of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) stage and tissue differentiation affect treatment efficacy and prognosis, highlighting the importance of understanding the risk factors that affect these parameters. Therefore, this study analyzed risk factors affecting the GC stage and differentiation and the relationships between the cancer site and the sex and age of the patient. We collected clinical data from 6961 patients with GC, including sex, age, endoscopic lesion location, and pathological differentiation. Patients were grouped based on GC stage (early or advanced), differentiation (well or poorly differentiated), and lesion site (upper stomach [cardia and fundus], middle stomach [gastric body], and lower stomach [gastric antrum]). Differences in sex, age, location, stage, and degree of differentiation were assessed based on these groupings. Univariate analysis revealed that the disease location and differentiation significantly differed based on the GC stage (P < 0.05), whereas sex, age, site, and stage significantly differed based on GC differentiation (P < 0.05). A multivariate analysis confirmed these factors as independent risk factors affecting GC. Moreover, lesion sites significantly differed between sexes (P < 0.05) and among age groups (P < 0.05). Although the effects of family history, lifestyle, and Helicobacter pylori infection status of the patients were not considered, this single-center retrospective study established independent risk factors for GC. Trial registration ChiCTR2200061989.


Definition
Early gastric cancer refers to tumors that are confined to the mucosal and submucosal layers, regardless of the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis 10 .Advanced gastric cancer is characterized by tumor invasion beyond the submucosal layer into deeper layers, which may include penetration into the muscularis propria, serosa, or the occurrence of lymph node metastasis and/or distant metastasis 10 .In this study, the early gastric cancer specimens include a portion of those resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and a portion from gastrectomy specimens.Advanced gastric cancer specimens include those from gastrectomy as well as those diagnosed based on endoscopic appearance and biopsy pathology results, due to a subset of patients opting against surgical treatment.

Data collection and groupings
We collected data on sex, age, endoscopic lesion location, and pathological differentiation.Patients were grouped based on GC stage (early or advanced), lesion site (upper stomach [cardia and fundus], middle stomach [gastric body], and lower stomach [gastric antrum]), and differentiation status (well-differentiated [well and moderately differentiated] and poorly differentiated [poorly differentiated, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and signet ring cell carcinoma]).

Statistical analyses
The risk factors affecting GC stage and differentiation degree, as well as differences between age, sex, and incidence site groups, were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).Qualitative data are presented as the number of cases and percentages, and the c 2 test was used to compare two groups.Influencing factors were analyzed by logistic regression.All variables with P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were used in the multivariate analysis.Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Ethical approval
The Ethics Committee of the Shanxi Cancer Hospital approved this study (2019091).All patients provided written informed consent, and the trial passed the clinical trial registration process (ChiCTR2200061989).

Patient demographics
We included 6961 patients diagnosed with GC.Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of these patients.

GC stage risk factors
The univariate analysis identified significant differences in the GC stage based on the lesion site (P < 0.05; Table 2).The incidence rate of advanced GC significantly differed between the lower and upper and middle locations (P < 0.05), whereas it did not differ between the upper and middle locations.Furthermore, the degree of differentiation significantly differed between GC stages (P < 0.05), whereas sex and age did not (P > 0.05).The multivariate analysis identified disease location and degree of differentiation as significant variables (P < 0.05), and thus, as independent risk factors affecting the GC stage (Table 3).

GC differentiation risk factors
In the univariate analysis, sex, age, location, and stage significantly differed based on the differentiation status (P < 0.05; Table 4).Specifically, the middle and upper location incidence rates significantly differed (P < 0.05), as did those for the lower, and upper and middle locations (both P < 0.05).The multivariate analysis identified sex, age, location, and stage as significant variables (P < 0.05), and thus, independent risk factors affecting GC differentiation (Table 5).

GC location comparisons
Lesion location significantly differed between sexes (P < 0.05; Table 6).Specifically, the male-to-female ratio significantly differed between the upper and lower GC sites (P < 0.001), suggesting that men had a higher incidence rate of upper GC than GC in other sites.However, the male-to-female ratios did not differ between the middle and lower sites (P > 0.05).Moreover, disease location significantly differed among age groups (P < 0.05; Table 7).

Discussion
GC is a gastrointestinal tumor with significant implications for human health.Early stages of GC typically lack clinical manifestations; therefore, most patients have progressed to the mid and late stages by the time of diagnosis, resulting in a poor quality of life and prognosis.Notably, Japan, the United States, and South Korea exhibit high early GC diagnosis rates exceeding 70%, approximately 70%, and exceeding 50%, respectively.In www.nature.com/scientificreports/contrast, China and Europe exhibit a considerably lower early GC diagnosis rate of less than 10% [11][12][13] contributing to a higher incidence of advanced GC at the time of diagnosis.Therefore, understanding the risk factors for advanced GC is crucial.
In the present study, our univariate analysis identified onset location and degree of differentiation as GC stage risk factors, which were subsequently confirmed as independent risk factors affecting GC stage in our multivariate analysis.These results are consistent with those of Yu et al. who reported that stage and degree of differentiation were independent risk factors for GC prognosis 4    www.nature.com/scientificreports/risk factor for GC 10 .In the present study, the risk of poorly differentiated GC developing into advanced GC was 11.83 times higher than that of well-differentiated GC.Moreover, advanced GC was 2.47 times more likely to develop in the upper part of the stomach than in the lower part.Therefore, poorly differentiated GC and lesions in the upper stomach are more likely to progress into advanced GC.Consequently, clinical endoscopists should prioritize observation of the upper stomach, such as by using linked imaging technology or magnifying endoscopic observation, and become adept at recognizing the endoscopic appearance of poorly differentiated GC to decrease instances of missed diagnoses and improve early diagnosis rates, thereby prolonging patient survival 14 .
In addition, our results indicated that regardless of early or advanced GC, the most common GC site was the upper stomach.However, more patients exhibited early GC in the lower stomach than in the middle stomach, and more patients exhibited advanced GC in the middle than in the lower stomach.This result may be attributed to the fact that the middle stomach is more likely to be missed during an examination compared to the lower stomach.Nonetheless, this trend requires further investigation.
GC differentiation is an independent risk factor affecting GC stage and survival; therefore, analyzing the risk factors affecting GC differentiation is necessary.Our univariate analysis indicated that sex, age, location, and lesion stage affected GC differentiation, and all these parameters were confirmed as independent risk factors in the multivariate analysis.Furthermore, 81.21% of patients with GC in the present study were men, a significantly higher percentage than that of women.This result may be attributed to the higher prevalence of smoking and drinking among men than among women 15 .
Previous studies have reported associations between well-differentiated GC and older age, male sex, and earlier tumor stage, and between poorly differentiated GC and younger age, female sex, and advanced tumor stage 16 .Consistent with these findings, in the present study, women had a higher risk of poorly differentiated GC than men, and the risk of poorly differentiated GC decreased with age.Moreover, we demonstrated that regardless of lesion location, more patients had poorly differentiated GC.Notably, more patients with early GC had well-differentiated tumors, whereas more patients with advanced GC had poorly differentiated tumors.However, our sample size may not be sufficiently large to prevent bias, and it remains unknown if patients with poorly differentiated GC were more likely to have had a previously missed diagnosis, warranting further investigation.
In the present study, lesion location was an independent risk factor affecting GC stage; thus, group comparisons based on the disease site provide valuable insights.We also demonstrated that the incidence site significantly differed between sexes.Specifically, the prevalence rates of upper, middle, and lower GC in men were 84.29, 78.77, and 77.13%, respectively, higher than those in women (15.71%, 21.23%, and 22.87%, respectively).As a result, the GC incidence rates in the upper, middle, and lower stomach were 5.37, 3.71, and 3.37 times higher in men than in women, respectively.Additionally, in men, the incidence rate of upper stomach GC was higher than that in other parts of the stomach.These differences may be related to various levels of exposure to risk factors.For instance, a considerably higher portion of men smoke and drink alcohol than women, significantly increasing their risk of upper stomach GC [15][16][17][18][19][20] .Additionally, some studies have suggested that female estrogen is associated with a decreased GC incidence, which may also offer an explanation for the observed higher incidence of GC in men than in women in the present study 21,22 .
In the present study, GC location significantly differed among age groups.Of those aged 50-80 years, 90.65% had upper GC.Furthermore, of those aged 40-80 years, 94.46% had middle GC and 93.96% had lower GC.The incidence of GC remains low until the age of 40 years and then increases rapidly, peaking in both sexes after the age of 80 23,24 .However, there is no uniform age at which GC screening is initiated across countries.Several European countries and the UK endoscopy guidelines recommend that patients with intestinal metaplasia, as well as those with a family history of gastric cancer, incomplete-type intestinal metaplasia, or persistent Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis, should undergo endoscopic surveillance every 3 years, whereas GC screening of asymptomatic individuals is not recommended [25][26][27][28] .Most Asian countries initiate GC screening between the ages of 40 and 45 years 29 , whereas the Japanese guidelines recommend GC screening starting at 50 years 30 .In the present study, over 10% of middle and lower GCs were detected in patients aged 40-50 years.These results highlight the need for appropriate measures to enhance awareness among the general population, conducting more early gastroscopies to rule out GC, and lowering the screening age to 40 years.This study had several limitations that should be acknowledged.First, this was a retrospective single-center study with a small sample size; thus, our results require further confirmation in a more extensive study across multiple centers.Second, the effect of a family history of GC on differentiation and staging could not be assessed.Third, the cancer registration database did not include data on H. pylori infection status and eradication history; thus, we could not evaluate the effects of H. pylori on GC differentiation and staging.Finally, this study did not analyze the effects of smoking, drinking, diet, or other factors on GC differentiation and staging.

Conclusion
This study demonstrated that the onset site and degree of differentiation were independent risk factors for GC stage, and sex, age, disease site, and lesion stage were independent risk factors for GC differentiation.Furthermore, GC location (upper, middle, or lower stomach) differed by age, and the prevalence of GC was higher in men than in women, especially in the upper stomach.Poorly differentiated GC and lesions in the upper stomach are more likely to progress into advanced GC; therefore, screening below the age of 40 years should be performed as an appropriate measure. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58018-6
. Similarly, Smyth et al. reported that poor differentiation was a

Table 2 .
Univariate analysis of gastric cancer stages.*Analyzed by trend test; a P < 0.05 compared with the upper location; b P < 0.05 compared with the middle location.GC: Gastric cancer.

Table 3 .
Multivariate analysis of gastric cancer stages.CI Confidence interval, OR Odds ratio, SE Standard error.

Table 4 .
Univariate analysis of gastric cancer differentiation.*Analyzed by trend test; a P < 0.05 compared with the upper location; b P < 0.05 compared with the middle location.

Table 5 .
Multivariate analysis of gastric cancer differentiation.CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; SE: Standard error.

Table 6 .
Relationships between gastric cancer location and sex. a P < 0.05 compared with the upper location.

Table 7 .
Relationships between gastric cancer location and age (years).a P < 0.05 compared with the upper location.