Abstract
Allopregnanolone (ALLO) is a known neurosteroid and a progesterone metabolite synthesized in the ovary, CNS, PNS, adrenals and placenta. Its role in the neuroendocrine control of ovarian physiology has been studied, but its in situ ovarian effects are still largely unknown. The aims of this work were to characterize the effects of intrabursal ALLO administration on different ovarian parameters, and the probable mechanism of action. ALLO administration increased serum progesterone concentration and ovarian 3β-HSD2 while decreasing 20α-HSD mRNA expression. ALLO increased the number of atretic follicles and the number of positive TUNEL granulosa and theca cells, while decreasing positive PCNA immunostaining. On the other hand, there was an increase in corpora lutea diameter and PCNA immunostaining, whereas the count of TUNEL-positive luteal cells decreased. Ovarian angiogenesis and the immunohistochemical expression of GABAA receptor increased after ALLO treatment. To evaluate if the ovarian GABAA receptor was involved in these effects, we conducted a functional experiment with a specific antagonist, bicuculline. The administration of bicuculline restored the number of atretic follicles and the diameter of corpora lutea to normal values. These results show the actions of ALLO on the ovarian physiology of the female rat during the follicular phase, some of them through the GABAA receptor. Intrabursal ALLO administration alters several processes of the ovarian morpho-physiology of the female rat, related to fertility and oocyte quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Allopregnanolone (ALLO; IUPAC: 1-[(3R,5S,8R,9S,10S,13S,14S,17S)-3-hydroxy-10,13-dimethyl-2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-tetradecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]ethenone) is an endogenous steroid synthesized de novo or by progesterone (P4) metabolism in the nervous system, adrenal glands, ovaries and placenta in the female1,2,3,4,5. ALLO is mostly known for its anxiolytic, antidepressant, anticonvulsant and neuroprotective actions at the central nervous system (CNS) level6,7,8,9. Moreover, it can modulate a variety of behaviors, such as reproductive10,11,12,13, social, exploratory and affective conducts14,15,16. Previous work from our laboratory reported ALLO actions over the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis when administered via ICV17,18,19 and its effects on the ovarian peripheral innervation using an ex vivo culture of the superior mesenteric ganglion- ovarian nervous plexus—ovarian system20,21,22. These findings led us to consider ALLO not only as a modulator of central function but also of ovarian physiology.
The ovary is one of the major sources of circulating ALLO23,24, and the ovarian cells express many membrane receptors that could be action sites for its in situ reproductive modulation. ALLO is synthesized by ovarian interstitial cells, follicles and corpora lutea (CL)25. Its serum concentrations vary along the rat estrous cycle24, human menstrual cycle and gestation26, following P4 levels24,27, and its ovarian synthesis is stimulated by LH28. The changes in steroid hormones serum concentration is also accompanied by an increase in their ovarian concentration24. However, the direct actions of ALLO over the ovarian physiology are not known.
ALLO is considered a potent positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors (GABAAR), enhancing GABAergic activity at nanomolar concentrations and directly activating the receptor at micromolar concentrations29,30,31,32,33. There are few reports of the presence and function of GABAAR in non-neural tissue34. The presence of GABAAR, GABA and the enzyme glutamate acid decarboxylase (GAD) has been previously demonstrated in the ovary34,35,36. Ovarian GABA concentrations change throughout the estrous cycle37 and gestation38,39. An example of non-neural GABAergic action occurs in the uterus of pregnant rats, where ALLO exerts its effects by regulating the contractions of the rat’s myometrium40,41,42. In addition, in pseudopregnant rats, an intrabursal perfusion of GABA (0.5 µM) produces vasoconstriction, a decrease in P4 secretion, and an immediate increase in estrogen secretion43. The importance of P4 metabolite-mediated regulation of non-neural GABAAR present in the rat reproductive system remains to be fully elucidated.
To evaluate the action of a GABAAR modulator, it is important to test its functional activity by using an antagonist. Briefly, in a receptor functional study, the antagonist prevents the action of the agonist, thus avoiding its effect. This confirms that the receptor is indeed involved in the agonist’s actions. Bicuculline (BIC) is a benzylisoquinoline alkaloid and a competitive antagonist of GABAAR44. In a primary culture of astrocytes, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of bicuculline on GABAARs is 3.3 μM for a concentration of 30 μM GABA. It shows a Hills coefficient of − 1.8 (± 0.06), indicating negative cooperativity at the receptor (initial binding inhibits subsequent binding to other receptor sites)45. Bicuculline sensitivity is defined by IUPHAR as an important criterion in the definition of GABAARs46,47,48, and it is the most frequently used antagonist for GABAAR functional studies.
Bearing in mind the previous findings, we analyzed ALLO effects on the local regulation of ovarian key features using an in vivo intrabursal administration model. We evaluated (a) changes in ovarian morphometry, weight and ovulation, (b) ovarian angiogenesis, (c) apoptosis and proliferation of granulosa and luteal cells, d) steroidogenesis and hormone secretion. Finally, in order to determine whether the actions of ALLO involve this receptor, we performed a GABAAR functional experiment with bicuculline. This is the first evidence of the local effect of ALLO on the female rat ovarian function and its eventual pathological consequences.
Materials and methods
Reagents
Allopregnanolone (C21H34O2, 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA, CAS Number 516-54-1), Ketamine HCl (Ketonal 50 mg/ml, Richmond Laboratories, Veterinary Division, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and Xylazine (Sedomin 100 mg/ml, König Laboratories, Buenos Aires, Argentina) were used for experimental and surgical procedures.
To obtain the stock solution, ALLO was first dissolved in propylene glycol at a concentration of 3.14 mM. Working concentration was obtained after serial dilutions in sterile physiological solution; the resulting propylene glycol concentration was less than 0.2%.
Bicuculline methiodide [1(S),9(R)-(-)-Bicuculline methiodide, Sigma, USA] was used to antagonize GABAARs. A stock solution was prepared in DMSO at an initial concentration of 1 × 10−2 M. Working concentrations were obtained by dilution of the initial one in physiological solution; the resulting DMSO concentration at working solutions was less than 0.2%.
The control group received physiological solution (BRAUN, Buenos Aires, Argentina) with a similar concentration of propylene glycol/DMSO.
Bouin solution (Biopur Diagnostics, Santa Fe, Argentina), hematoxylin, eosin (Merk, Germany) and Canada Balsam Synthetic (Biopack, Buenos Aires, Argentina) were used for histological procedures.
Animals
Adult female Sprague Dawley rats (Rattus norvegicus) of 200–250 g were maintained under controlled conditions of temperature and light (12 h light/12 h darkness photoperiod). They were housed in groups of four animals per cage, with food (standard rat chow, Cargill, Córdoba, Argentina) and water available ad libitum. Vaginal smears from each rat were observed daily (07:00–09:00 am) with a light microscope (Zeiss, Germany) to determine the stage of the estrous cycle. Only those animals exhibiting two or more consecutive 4 or 5-day cycles were used. All protocols were previously approved by the Institutional Committee for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National University of Cuyo (CICUAL aval: 154/2019). The animals for these experiments were kept and handled according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th edition (National Research Council). The study was performed, and results reported in accordance to ARRIVE guidelines. The total number of animals used for the experiments was 35.
Anesthesia
A combination of ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally was used. Confirmation of the level of anesthesia was assessed by loss of postural reflex, palpebro-palpebral reflex, corneo-palpebral reflex, podal reflex and lack of response to tail pinch.
Surgical procedure
Access to each ovary was made through two paramedian ventral incisions. This procedure allowed gentle handling of the tissue and correct visualization of the inoculation site, and thus to evaluate the complete discharge of the inoculum and the integrity of the post-manipulation bursa.
With the animal in lateral decubitus, a skin incision was made no more than 10 mm caudal to the last rib (Fig. 1), taking as anatomical references the greater trochanter of the femur and the vertebral column. The ovary was carefully lifted with forceps, taking it by one of the fat pads that surround it. Once outside the abdominal cavity, the ovary was placed on a pad of wet gauze adjacent to the incision site to avoid dehydration of the structures. The corresponding treatment (5 µl of total volume) was then injected using a Hamilton type syringe. Correct inoculation was corroborated by visualizing the needle and dilation of the post-injection bursa. The needle was quickly withdrawn with care not to tear the ovarian bursa. Then, the ovary was carefully reintroduced into the abdominal cavity and each of the incised planes was sutured. The described procedure was performed on each abdominal side, taking less than 8 min in total. After surgery, the animals were kept under observation in a heated room until they fully recovered from anesthesia. After 24 h, the animals were in perfect condition with no signs of pain or lethargy.
The ovarian intrabursal drug delivery model was used to analyze the local effects of ALLO on ovarian physiology. This model allows in vivo topical administration of drugs to the ovary, keeping the anatomy, innervation, and blood flow intact49. Treatments inoculated into the bursal cavity rapidly penetrate the ovarian parenchyma50,51. In this way, the ovulation rate and in situ response to the applied drugs can be assessed while the ovary is under systemic regulation.
Experimental design
On the morning of proestrus, 5 µl of ALLO at a concentration of 6 µM and controls were administered intrabursally (Fig. 1). The ALLO concentration of 6 µM was chosen for these studies based on a concentration–response curve (data not shown) and previous works. It was the pharmacological concentration with the greatest effects on ovarian physiology19,22.
The inoculation volume was determined based on the work of Abramovich et al.52. On the morning of estrus, 24 h later, the animals were euthanized by guillotine decapitation. Confirmation of estrous was performed prior to euthanasia. The ovaries were removed and placed in glass Petri dishes with chilled saline solution for subsequent assays. Serum samples were collected and stored at − 80 °C until processing. All the counts were recorded by a researcher blinded to the group.
Experiment 1 A paired model was used to reduce the variability between groups. Thus, the left ovary of each animal received ALLO 6 µM and the right ovary (control) received saline. A paired study is possible since the changes produced by the inoculation of treatments in one ovary are not compensated by the contralateral49, at least until 24 h after their injection53. Also, the intrabursal administration of saline solution, commonly used in the control ovary, does not alter ovarian physiology54,55. For serum hormone determinations, both ovaries of two groups of animals were treated with saline or ALLO 6 µM (not paired experiment). The total number of animals used for this experiment was 15.
Experiment 2 To evaluate whether some of the ALLO actions on ovarian morphometry were mediated by GABAAR, a functional assay was performed with bicuculline, a competitive GABAAR antagonist. We tested 3 commonly used doses: 5, 10 and 100 µM56,57,58. None of the BIC concentrations per se induced significant changes in the evaluated parameters (data not shown). Therefore, the 10 µM concentration was selected for this experiment. In this case, both ovaries were injected with the treatments (n = 5 animals/group). For this experiment the total number of animals used was 20.
Evaluation of ovulation and ovarian weight
After removal of the ovaries, the distended portion of the ampullae was located and punctured with a 21-gauge needle under a stereoscopic magnifying glass (Zeiss, Germany). The number of oocytes released were then counted for each ovary. To clean the ovary, the adhering tissue and fat were dissected out and discarded. The ovaries were weighted on an analytical scale. The number of animals used was 5, with 5 ovaries per experimental group.
Ovarian morphometry
After ovarian weight analysis, the ovaries were immediately fixed in Bouin solution for 12 h. They were then dehydrated in a series of increasing concentrations of ethyl alcohol and finally embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections of 5 μm were taken every 40 μm and mounted onto microscope slides to prevent counting the same structure twice, according to the method described by Woodruff et al.53. Finally, the slides were stained with hematoxylin–eosin and mounted with mounting medium.
Follicles were classified as primary (a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells), secondary (more than one layer of granulosa cells with an incipient antrum), tertiary (more than three granulosa layers and a clearly defined antral space) or Graafian follicles (polarized oocyte, defined cumulus granulosa layer and a cavity occupying most of the follicular volume). Corpora lutea were identified by the presence of large and small luteal cells with their characteristic cytoplasmic eosinophilia59. Corpora albicans were scarce, and they were not taken into account. Morphological characteristics of atretic follicles (ATF) include pyknotic nuclei (cell degeneration) in more than 5% of the total number of granulosa cells, detachment of the granulosa cell layer from the basal laminae, hypertrophy of external theca and oocyte degeneration60. Follicular cysts were identified by a thin granulosa layer (≤ 3 mm) and a large antral cavity (the oocyte may be absent or present)61. The number of ovarian structures was determined in four ovarian sections from each ovary (n = 5 animals/group). The structure diameters were measured using Image J software (Image Processing and Analysis in Java; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Results were expressed as mean diameter ± SEM.
In situ cell death detection (TUNEL)
For quantification of apoptosis in follicles and CL, 3 µm thick paraffin sections were processed for in situ localization of nuclei showing DNA fragmentation by the TUNEL technique (terminal-end-labeling with dUTP-digoxigenin using the enzyme deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)). Ovarian sections were deparaffinized and hydrated by washing in ethyl alcohol of decreasing concentration (100°–70°). They were then incubated with Proteinase K 20 μg/ml (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 10 min at room temperature, followed by incubation in 0.01 M citrate buffer pH 6 for 30 min at 90–100 °C. The In-situ Cell Death Detection KIT, POD (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was used. The labeling reaction was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
The preparations were incubated with digoxigenin-dUTP and TdT enzyme (labeling solution and enzyme solution) for 1 and 30 min, respectively. They were then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin monoclonal antibody for 30 min in a humid chamber at 37 °C. Finally, apoptotic positive cells were visualized after reaction with diaminobenzidine (SIGMAFAST™ 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tablets, Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany). Negative controls were obtained by replacing the TdT solution with phosphate buffer pH 7. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The number of apoptotic cells was determined by counting labeled cells in follicles in randomly selected fields at 400 × magnification (n = 5 ovaries/group). The apoptotic index was calculated as the percentage of apoptotic cells relative to the total number of cells.
Immunohistochemistry
Ovarian tissue sections were cut at 3 µm and mounted on positively charged slides. Tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated by washing with alcohols. Antigen retrieval was performed in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer at pH 6 for 10 min in a microwave oven at maximum power (800 W).
Endogenous peroxidase enzyme activity was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide solution in PBS buffer for 10 min. Blocking of non-specific binding sites was performed in a humidity chamber by incubating the sections with 2% BSA (bovine serum albumin) for 20 min at room temperature. The histological sections were then incubated with 20 µl of the primary antibodies listed in Table 1 overnight at 4 °C in a humidity chamber.
A negative control mouse IgG (I-2000-1, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used instead of the primary mouse monoclonal antibody to evaluate non-specific binding. A secondary negative control was performed by omitting incubation of the sections with the primary antibody. The next day, after successive washes with PBS, the sections were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies listed in Table 1 for 2 h. They were then incubated with ABC: avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex (Vectastain ABC system, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 30 min. Positive labeling was visualized by precipitation of the peroxidase enzyme substrate, diaminobenzidine (DAB), in developer buffer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). The reaction was stopped with distilled water and counterstained with hematoxylin for 1 min. Upon completion of immunolabeling, photographs were taken with a digital camera attached to a light microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA) for further processing. Image J software was used to count positively labeled cells and total cells per structure.
Cell proliferation was evaluated by PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) in secondary, tertiary and de Graaf follicles as well as in CL. This group of follicles is the most susceptible to degeneration by atresia, since they depend on gonadotrophin stimulation for their survival and can sense the balance between external pro/anti-apoptotic factors62,63. The proliferation index was calculated for each field using the following formula: number of immunolabeled cells/total number of cells counted per field. The number of apoptotic cells was determined by counting labeled cells in follicles in randomly selected fields at 400 × magnification (n = 5 ovaries/group). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM of cells positive for the selected antigen.
The percentage of positively labeled endothelial (von Willebrand factor-labeled) and peri-endothelial (α-actin-labeled) areas relative to the total ovarian area was quantified using Image J software. The examined areas were determined in 3 ovarian sections from each ovary. The results were expressed as mean ± SEM of the positively labeled endothelial area.
Corpora lutea vascular area
Lectin BS-1 (from Bandeiraea simplicifolia, 20 mg/ml), a proven constitutive endothelial cell marker64,65, was used to assess CL blood vessels. Ovarian sections were incubated with biotinylated lectin BS-1 overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the slides were incubated with avidin biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex (Vectastain ABC system) for 30 min. Protein expression was revealed with diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining. Hematoxylin was used as a counterstain. The slides were then dehydrated before mounting (Canada Balsam Synthetic, Biopack, Argentina). Negative controls were obtained in the absence of lectin BS-1.
Vascular area (lectin BS-1-positive cells) was determined by thresholding the positive stained area and calculated by relativization to the total luteal area of the captured photograph using the Image J software (n = 3 animals/group, 16 ovarian sections/group).
Hormone determinations by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA)
For hormone determination, one group of animals received saline or ALLO 6 µM in both ovaries (n = 5 animals/group). Serum estrogen (E2), P4 and FSH concentrations were determined by CLIA using a Mindray CL-1200i analyzer (Mindray Laboratories, Shenzhen, China) and its specific reagents, with analytical sensitivity of ≤ 0.2 mIU/mL for FSH, ≤ 25 pg for E2, and ≤ 0.1 ng/mL for P4.
Real-time PCR
Total RNA was obtained from ovarian fragments using the TRIZOL method according to the manufacturer’s instructions (n = 4 animals/group). Quantification of the RNA obtained was performed in a Jenway spectrophotometer at 260 nm. RNA integrity was verified by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel stained with SYBR Gold (Thermofisher Scientific Technologies, Buenos Aires, Argentina). Five micrograms of total RNA were retrotranscribed at 37 °C using random hexamer primers (Random Hexamers, Thermofisher) and murine leukemia virus retrotranscriptase enzyme (M-MLV, Thermofisher) in a reaction mixture with a final volume of 20 µl, according to previously published steps21.
Reactions were performed in a real-time Corbett Rotor Gene 6000 thermal cycler (Corbett Research Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia), with a final volume of 20 µl. The reaction mixture consisted of 2 µL of 10 × PCR buffer, 1 µL of 50 mM MgCl2, 0.4 µL of 10 mM dNTPs, 1 µL of 20 × Eva Green (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA), 0.25 µL of 5 U/µL Taq DNA Polymerase (Thermofisher), 0.1 µL of each primer (sense and antisense, detailed in Table 2) 2.5 mM, and 10 µL of cDNA diluted 1/20 in sterile RNAase-free H2O. PCR reactions were initiated with a 5-min incubation at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s.
Melt curve analysis was used to verify that a single specific amplified product was generated. Real-time quantification was monitored by measuring the increase in fluorescence caused by the binding of EvaGreen dye to double-stranded DNA at the end of each amplification cycle. Relative expression was determined using the comparative quantitation method of normalized samples relative to the expression of a calibrator sample according to the manufacturer’s instructions66. Each PCR run included a non-template control and a sample without reverse transcriptase.
All measurements were performed in duplicate. Reaction conditions and amounts of cDNA added were calibrated so that the assay response was linear with respect to the amount of cDNA input for each pair of primers (Table 2). RNA samples were tested for DNA contamination by performing the respective PCR reactions without prior reverse transcription.
The reference gene used to normalize the results was ribosomal S16. For the selection of this gene, the expression stability of 3 candidate genes, β-actin, S16 and HPRT1 (hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 enzyme), was estimated using the free software BestKeeper® version 1 [http://gene-quantification.com/bestkeeper.html]. S16 showed the lowest coefficient of variation between groups and the highest stability between treatments.
Statistical analysis
The raw data obtained were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism V.8.0.1 for Windows (Graph Pad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Shapiro–Wilk normality test was performed before statistical analysis. Paired Student’s t-test was used to determine differences between the means of paired normally distributed groups. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used for hormone assays. Wilcoxon signed ranked test was used to determine differences between the means of paired non-normally distributed groups. The comparisons between the means of different groups were carried out using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc. The Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison method was used to analyze nonparametric results. Two-tailed values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Experiment 1
Effect of ALLO 6 µM on ovarian steroidogenesis
Intrabursal administration of ALLO 6 µM induced a significant increase in 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD2) (p = 0.0451) and a significant decrease in 20α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (20α-HSD) enzyme gene expression (p = 0.0137). No significant changes in 3α-hydroxysteroid oxidoreductase (3α-HSOR) mRNA expression were observed (p = 0.9608, Fig. 2).
ALLO administration significantly increased P4 (p = 0.0010) and E2 (p = 0.0079) serum concentration (Fig. 3).
We also measured FSH serum levels. ALLO treatment induced a significant increase in this hormone (p = 0.0010, Fig. 3).
Effects of ALLO 6 μM on ovarian morphometry, weight and ovulation
ALLO intrabursal administration did not induce changes in ovarian weight (p = 0.7807, Fig. 4A) or in the number of ovulated oocytes (p = 0.5457; Fig. 4B).
ALLO administration resulted in a significant increase in the number of ATF (p = 0.0077). However, none of the other ovarian structures were significantly affected by the treatment (Fig. 5).
Regarding the diameter of the measured structures, ALLO 6 µM induced a significant increase (p < 0.0001) in the largest diameter of CL. The diameter of tertiary follicles was not affected (Fig. 6).
Ovarian BAX, BCL-2, FAS, FAS-L and cyclin D1 gene expression
ALLO 6 µM induced a significant increase in gene expression of both BAX (p = 0.0303) and BCL-2 (p = 0.0236), but without significant changes in the BAX/BCL-2 ratio (p = 0.2778, Fig. 7).
Regarding the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis, ALLO induced a significant increase in the FAS/FAS-L ratio (p = 0.0213, Fig. 7). ALLO administration did not significantly affect FAS (p = 0.0983) and FAS-L (p = 0.1714) gene expression.
Cyclin D1 gene expression was analyzed as a marker of ovarian cell proliferation. Intrabursal administration of 6 µM ALLO produced a significant decrease in this marker (p = 0.0465; Fig. 7).
Effect of ALLO 6 µM on follicular granulosa and theca cell proliferation and apoptosis
Administration of ALLO 6 µM induced a significant decrease in the proliferation index of theca (p = 0.0312) and granulosa (p < 0.0003) cells, accompanied by a significant increase in the apoptotic index (theca: p = 0.0019 and granulosa: p < 0.0001; Fig. 8).
Effect of ALLO 6 µM on the process of luteal cell proliferation and apoptosis
Paired intrabursal administration of 6 µM ALLO induced a significant increase in immunolabeling for PCNA in CL (p < 0.0001), accompanied by a significant decrease in TUNEL-positive cells (p < 0.0001; Fig. 9).
Ovarian angiogenesis
The effect of ALLO 6 µM on vascular wall markers, α-smooth muscle actin and Von Willebrand factor was evaluated with the aim of analyzing angiogenesis. ALLO treatment significantly increased the percentage of relative vascular area for both markers (α-actin p = 0.0005; Von Willebrand p = 0.0058) compared to control (Fig. 10).
Corpora lutea angiogenesis
Lectin BS-1 staining significantly increased in CL after ALLO 6 µM treatment (Fig. 11).
Ovarian expression of the GABAA Rα1-6 receptor
The expression of the ovarian GABAAR staining increased after ALLO 6 µM treatment (Fig. 12). The positive mark was found in stroma, blood vessels, CL and the theca of healthy and atretic follicles.
Experiment 2
Number of atretic follicles
BIC administration did not produce significant differences with respect to the control. The administration of BIC prior to ALLO prevented the increase in the number of ATF, showing a significant decrease compared to the administration of ALLO alone (F(3, 16) = 12.10; p = 0.0002) (Fig. 13).
CL diameter
None of the BIC concentrations per se induced significant changes in CL diameter (p < 0.0001). When BIC was administered prior to ALLO, values returned to normal (Fig. 13).
Discussion
Ovarian steroidogenesis and local steroid-mediated signaling is critical for proper ovarian function. An alteration in these processes may be the cause of various reproductive pathologies and infertility67. P4 biosynthesis and its metabolites are known as important regulators of the ovarian physiology. Considering that the concentration of P4 metabolites follows the same pattern as their precursor, and that the enzymes for its synthesis are found in ovarian tissue24, it is likely that derivatives are involved in local regulation. In this work, the effects of direct intrabursal ALLO administration were evaluated. It is important to note that the administration of the treatments was performed during the morning of the proestrus day, prior to the preovulatory LH peak, and at a time when ovarian P4 concentrations are low. The animals were sacrificed 24 h later, on the morning of estrus.
Plasma concentrations of E2 and P4 were measured to evaluate the endocrine response of the ovaries to the treatment. ALLO induced a significant increase in E2 concentration, detected on the morning of estrus. The peak of E2 during the normal estrous cycle of the rat typically occurs during the morning-afternoon of proestrus, with its plasma concentration decreasing towards estrus68,69. The increase in E2 during the follicular phase induces a positive feedback on GnRH neurons70,71,72,73, while a longer-lasting serum increase in E2 sensitizes the pituitary to GnRH action74. This coincides with the significant increase in plasma FSH produced by ALLO. As for the source of circulating E2, although an increase in the number of atretic follicles was observed, many were in early stages, so their granulosa cells (GCs) could still have been functional. Also, the increase in FSH could have stimulated the expression of follicular aromatase in preovulatory and non-ovulatory follicles, increasing secretion75. In addition, the CL of the rat retains its ability to secrete E2; hence, it could also have participated in this effect76,77,78.
ALLO significantly increased serum P4 concentration. The physiological peak of follicular P4 secretion occurs during the afternoon—night of proestrus, recovering basal values in the morning of estrus68,69. This peak is responsible for facilitating the preovulatory release of LH and occurs due to the action of FSH on the GCs of the preovulatory follicle79. Thus, an increase in P4 serum concentration could bring forward or magnify LH secretion80. It is known that an exogenous dose of subcutaneous P4 administered in the morning of proestrus produces a marked increase in ovarian periovulatory P4 secretion and sensitizes the tissue to the action of gonadotropins. In turn, FSH stimulation during estrus increases P4 synthesis by the GCs of the preovulatory follicle79,81. The results presented here suggest that the administration of ALLO during this period could have similar consequences, stimulating the release of P4 by CL and follicles. The increase in CL diameter produced by ALLO could also support this hypothesis. Another feasible hypothesis is that ALLO administration alters the inhibin-activin-follistatin system, necessary for the paracrine regulation of ovarian steroidogenesis and response to gonadotropins82, although more studies should be performed to confirm this.
There is evidence of the role of the GABAergic system in endocrine organs, where it acts as a modulator of hormone synthesis and release43,83. ALLO could be modulating the release of ovarian E2 and P4 through the GABAAR. Thus, the non-neural GABAergic system of these organs represents a possible therapeutic target for drugs that interact with GABA or its receptor. The changes in ovarian steroidogenesis induced by ALLO show effects that could destabilize the delicate endocrine balance. ALLO can alter hypothalamic regulation and induce pharmacological reprogramming of the CL. Pharmacological studies that include an in-depth analysis of systemic effects and implications are therefore of particular interest.
The intrabursal administration of ALLO 6 µM did not produce significant alterations in preovulatory follicles, thus allowing ovulation. Ovarian weight was also analyzed, and no significant differences were found for any of the treatments.
ALLO 6 µM treatment induced a significant increase in the number of atretic follicles interfering with follicular dynamics, affecting the selection and recruitment of dominant follicles for the following cycle. No significant changes in the diameter of tertiary follicles were observed. As for the CLs present in the treated ovaries, their number was not greater than that of the controls, but their diameter was significantly higher. During estrus, CLs from previous cycles are in different stages of luteolysis, showing areas of cell degeneration, fibrosis, and a reduction in size. At this stage, the newly formed CLs begin to increase in size84. As no changes in the number of ovulated oocytes were recorded, the increase in CL diameter could be interpreted as a delay in luteolysis of CL corresponding to previous cycles.
Pharmacological “reprogramming” of rodent CLs that have already embarked on the path of luteolysis is possible85. A postpartum subcutaneous injection of P4 in rats can inhibit luteal cell apoptosis86. Intrabursal administration of P4 to pregnant rats after activation of luteolysis by LH blocks induction of 20α-HSD activity, increases serum P4 concentrations and decreases ovarian PGF2α concentrations87. Thus, ALLO could interact with CL from previous cycles, recovering them from luteolysis. This finding could be useful for the treatment of reproductive conditions that involve deficiencies in CL functionality, or that are caused by early regression of the CL.
The expression of ovarian steroidogenic enzymes involved in P4 synthesis and metabolism was analyzed by real-time PCR. Treatment with ALLO induced an increase in the enzyme 3β-HSD2, which synthesizes P4, accompanied by a decrease in 20α-HSD, which metabolizes it to a derivative lacking progestational activity88,89. These findings are compatible with the increase in plasma P4 produced by ALLO and a possible luteotrophic effect. There were no significant changes in 3α-HSOR gene expression. ALLO does not seem to regulate mRNA expression of the enzyme responsible for the final step in its synthesis, unlike what happens with P4 in the rat90,91.
The expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic ovarian markers varies cyclically and between ovarian structures, determining their fate. ALLO treatment induced an imbalance in ovarian pro- and anti-apoptotic markers, with a significant effect on the FAS/FAS-L ratio, showing an anti-apoptotic effect that could correlate with the inhibition of luteolysis. During luteolysis, prolactin activates CL apoptosis via the FAS/FAS-L system92, and ALLO administration may override this effect. Cyclin D1 is a marker of cell proliferation that shows higher expression in non-luteinised theca and granulosa cells93. Its gene expression was significantly reduced after ALLO treatment, supporting previous findings of ALLO-mediated follicular atresia.
It is important to highlight that the ovarian parenchyma comprises two histologically and biochemically different structures that undergo cyclic changes. The mRNA expression results presented correspond to the processing of the whole ovary, making it difficult to determine which structure was affected. For the correct interpretation of results, it was necessary to complement them with other techniques to differentiate the effects on follicles and CL. Hence, a TUNEL technique and PCNA immunohistochemistry were performed. There was an increase in apoptosis of GCs and follicular theca cells, accompanied by a significant decrease in PCNA labeling, in concordance with the histological count. In the case of CLs, an opposite picture was observed, with a decrease in TUNEL labeling and an increase in PCNA. This result supports the luteotrophic effect of ALLO.
The process of apoptosis in the ovary is closely linked to variations in hormone secretion, driven by the regulation of the estrous cycle94. The increased follicular atresia found could be related to the hormonal imbalance caused by ALLO. Several studies95,96,97,98,99 have shown that the follicular fluid of atretic follicles contains altered levels of E2 and P4. However, elevated circulating concentrations of FSH, E2 and P4 could generate an ovarian trophic microenvironment, as they all possess anti-apoptotic effects on GC63,100,101,102,103,104,105. Thus, the ALLO stimulus on non-dominant follicles is decisive, since it occurs in an environment where other stimuli that inhibit follicular atresia are abundant. It is also possible that GABAAR activation induces an efflux of cellular chloride ions. In non-neural cells, chloride ions flow in both directions, according to the cellular electrochemical gradient, regulating osmotic tension106. Changes in intracellular ion concentration and cell volume could induce apoptosis107.
The development of the ovarian structures, as well as their function, depends on correct blood flow that allows the arrival of endocrine regulatory factors and the transport of the hormones produced. It has been demonstrated that the expression of angiogenic factors in the ovary is hormone-dependent; both the follicles and the CLs produce angiogenic factors108,109, which are then regulated by endocrine and paracrine factors. An increase in follicular vascularization selects dominant follicles, whereas its reduction is one of the first signs of atresia110,111. In the mature CL, approximately 50% of its cells correspond to endothelial cells112, and their blood flow correlates with P4 secretion113. Conversely, the decrease in CL blood flow is associated with luteolysis109,114. ALLO induced a significant increase in ovarian vascular and periendothelial area, immunolabeled with Von Willebrand and α-actin, respectively. This effect could be explained by the interaction between ALLO and the endothelial GABAergic system, where GABAAR activation induces an increase in cell proliferation and GABA synthesis115,116,117. ALLO could also modulate pro-angiogenic factors. We showed an increase in lectin BS-1 staining in the CL of ALLO treated ovaries; this finding could indicate increased blood flow to persistent CLs that have increased in diameter and functionality, thus increasing P4 secretion.
Functional studies determine the action of the ligand on a receptor and aid in the pharmacological characterization of the mechanism of action. In this case, to assess whether the action of ALLO in the ovarian parenchyma is GABAAR-dependent, a functional experiment was performed with BIC, a competitive antagonist of the receptor. This is the assay of choice to evaluate the interaction of agonists with GABAAR44.
GABA not only has functions on the central and peripheral nervous systems but is also present in a wide variety of peripheral tissues such as the intestine, stomach, gonads, and others118. Although the presence of GABAAR and a non-neural GABAergic circuit in the ovary is known, there are no studies that delve into its reproductive functionality. All the available studies correspond to modulation of the CNS and PNS7,9,119,120. The study of the effects of GABAAR system in the ovary is of particular interest due to the possible relationship with certain pathologies, such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and ovarian cancer, as well as possible undesirable effects of the systemic application of ALLO treatments. In a previous study, ALLO administration to the superior mesenteric ganglion significantly increased GABAA receptor protein expression in the ovary. In this work, ALLO intrabursal administration had a similar effect, increasing GABAA receptor staining in stroma, blood vessels, CL and the theca of healthy and atretic follicles. This effect might increase ovarian GABAergic effects and thus be responsible for some of ALLO actions.
When BIC 10 µM was administered prior to ALLO, a return to control-like values of the number of atretic follicles and CL diameter was observed. These results indicate that the action of ALLO on these structures is mediated through GABAAR. There is a differential effect between structures: apoptosis in follicles is promoted, while luteolysis is delayed. These opposing effects could be explained by considering the plasticity of the receptor present in the different structures.
In the CNS, GABAAR shows plasticity throughout the estrous cycle, so that its expression and conformation seem to be linked to the circulating concentration of P4 and ALLO121,122,123,124,125,126. The physiological response of GABAAR depends on the subunit composition of the receptor, which determines its functional properties127,128. For example, GABAARs containing the ɗ subunit are more sensitive to the action of neuroactive steroids such as ALLO8,129. Finally, GABAAR distribution in the CNS is region-specific130,131. GABAAR activation may thus vary between receptor composition and location. One might expect that these same changes could occur in non-neural tissues. Fujii and Mellon’s work42 corroborates this theory; they report changes in the subunit composition of the uterine GABAAR during pregnancy and postpartum in the rat, with the subunits exhibiting differing sensitivity to ALLO. Thus, it would also be expected that the effects assessed in this work would be different in the different stages of the rat’s estrous cycle.
In conclusion, the administration of intrabursal ALLO 6 µM alters several processes of the ovarian morpho-physiology of the female rat, such as luteal regression, follicular atresia, angiogenesis and ovarian steroidogenesis, which could be related to oocyte quality and fertility. ALLO 6 µM exerts a pro-apoptotic effect on growing follicles, which is proliferative in CL and pro-angiogenic in the ovary. It also alters steroidogenesis and hormonal balance at the estrous stage. Some ALLO effects occurred through the GABAAR, as they were be inhibited with BIC.
Dysregulations of the processes of apoptosis132, steroidogenesis25,133,134 and angiogenesis135 are related to ovarian pathologies such as PCOS and cancer. The study of the ovarian effects of GABAAR modulation by neuroactive steroids is of particular importance since they modulate key aspects of reproductive physiology.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Mensah-Nyagan, A. G. et al. Neurosteroids: Expression of steroidogenic enzymes and regulation of steroid biosynthesis in the central nervous system. Pharmacol. Rev. Pharmacol. Rev. 51, 63–81 (1999).
Corpéchot, C. et al. Neurosteroids: 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one and its precursor in the brain, plasma, and steroidogenic glands of male, and female rats. Endocrinology 133, 1003–1009 (1993).
Genazzani, A. R. et al. Effects of estradiol and raloxifene analog on brain, adrenal and serum allopregnanolone content in fertile and ovariectomized female rats. Neuroendocrinology 72, 162–170 (2000).
Yokoi, H., Tsuruo, Y., Miyamoto, T. & Ishimura, K. Steroid 5 alpha-reductase type 1 immunolocalized in the adrenal gland of normal, gonadectomized, and sex hormone-supplemented rats. Histochem. Cell Biol. 109, 127–134 (1998).
Holzbauer, M., Birmingham, M. K., de Nicola, A. F. & Oliver, J. T. In vivo secretion of 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one, a potent anaesthetic steroid, by the adrenal gland of the rat. J. Steroid Biochem. 22, 97–102 (1985).
Laconi, M. R., Casteller, G., Gargiulo, P. A., Bregonzio, C. & Cabrera, R. J. The anxiolytic effect of allopregnanolone is associated with gonadal hormonal status in female rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 417, 111–116 (2001).
Melcangi, R. C. & Panzica, G. C. Allopregnanolone: State of the art. Prog. Neurobiol. 113, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.09.005 (2014).
Paul, S. M., Pinna, G. & Guidotti, A. Allopregnanolone: From molecular pathophysiology to therapeutics. A historical perspective. Neurobiol. Stress 12, 100215 (2020).
Boero, G., Porcu, P. & Morrow, A. L. Pleiotropic actions of allopregnanolone underlie therapeutic benefits in stress-related disease. Neurobiol. Stress 12, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100203 (2020).
Laconi, M. R. & Cabrera, R. J. Effect of centrally injected allopregnanolone on sexual receptivity, luteinizing hormone release, hypothalamic dopamine turnover, and release in female rats. Endocrine 17, 77–83 (2002).
Pelegrina, L., Escudero, C., Giuliani, F., Cabrera, R. & Laconi, M. Pharmacological effect of one icv dose of allopregnanolone in the female rat: Behavioral profile. Braz. J. Biol. Sci. 2, 39–50 (2015).
Frye, C. A., Qrareya, A., Llaneza, D. C. & Paris, J. J. Central actions of 3α,5α-THP involving NMDA and GABAA receptors regulate affective and sexual behavior of female rats. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 14, 11 (2020).
Palumbo, M. A. et al. Allopregnanolone concentration in hippocampus of prepubertal rats and female rats throughout estrous cycle. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 18, 853–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03349832 (1995).
Frye, C. A., Parise, J. J. & Rhodes, M. E. Exploratory, anti-anxiety, social, and sexual behaviors of rats in behavioral estrus is attenuated with inhibition of 3α, 5α-THP formation in the midbrain ventral tegmental area. Behav. Brain Res. 23, 1–7 (2008).
Vacher, C. M. et al. Placental endocrine function shapes cerebellar development and social behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00896-4 (2021).
Diviccaro, S., Cioffi, L., Falvo, E., Giatti, S. & Melcangi, R. C. Allopregnanolone: An Overview on its Synthesis and Effects (John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2022).
Pelegrina, L. T. et al. A single dose of allopregnanolone affects rat ovarian morphology and steroidogenesis. Reproduction 153, 75–83 (2017).
Asensio, J. A. et al. Allopregnanolone alters follicular and luteal dynamics during the estrous cycle. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 16, 1–12 (2018).
Laconi, M. R. et al. Allopregnanolone alters the luteinizing hormone, prolactin, and progesterone serum levels interfering with the regression and apoptosis in rat corpus luteum. Horm. Metab. Res. 44, 632–638 (2012).
Cáceres, A. R. R., Vega Orozco, A. S., Cabrera, R. J. & Laconi, M. R. Rapid actions of the neurosteroid allopregnanolone on ovarian and hypothalamic steroidogenesis: Central and peripheral modulation. J. Neuroendocrinol. 32, 1–13 (2020).
Cáceres, A. R. R. et al. Superior mesenteric ganglion neural modulation of ovarian angiogenesis, apoptosis and proliferation by the neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone. J. Neuroendocrinol. 34, e13056. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13056 (2021).
Cáceres, A. R. R. et al. Effect of peripheral neural stimulation with allopregnanolone on ovarian physiology. J. Endocrinol. 258, e230026 (2023).
Genazzani, A. R. et al. Circulating levels of allopregnanolone in humans: Gender, age, and endocrine influences. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 2099–2103 (1998).
Holzbauer, M. Physiological variations in the ovarian production of 5α-pregnane derivatives with sedative properties in the rat. J. Steroid Biochem. 6, 1307–1310 (1975).
Sawada, T. & Ichikawa, S. Sites of production of sex steroids: Secretion of steroids from x-irradiated and poly cystic ovaries of rats. Endocrinology 102, 1436–1444 (1978).
Nappi, R. E. et al. Serum allopregnanolone in women with postpartum “blues”. Obstet Gynecol. 97, 77–80 (2001).
Genazzani, A. et al. Pulsatile secretory characteristics of allopregnanolone, a neuroactive steroid, during the menstrual cycle and in amenorrheic subjects. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 146, 347–356 (2002).
Ichikawa, S., Sawada, T., Nakamura, Y. & Morioka, H. Ovarian secretion of pregnane compounds during the estrous cycle and pregnancy in rats. Endocrinology 94, 1615–1620 (1974).
Belelli, D. & Lambert, J. J. Neurosteroids: Endogenous regulators of the GABAA receptor. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 565–575 (2005).
Lambert, J. J., Peters, J. A., Sturgess, N. C. & Hales, T. G. Steroid modulation of the GABAA receptor complex: electrophysiological studies. In Ciba Foundation Symposium 153‐Steroids and Neuronal Activity: Steroids and Neuronal Activity: Ciba Foundation Symposium 153 (1990).
Shu, H. J. et al. Slow actions of neuroactive steroids at GABAA receptors. J. Neurosci. 24, 6667–6675 (2004).
Majewska, M. D. Neurosteroids: Endogenous bimodal modulators of the GABAA receptor mechanism of action and physiological significance. Prog. Neurobiol. Pergamon. 38, 379–394 (1992).
Callachan, H. et al. Modulation of the GABA(A) receptor by progesterone metabolites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 231, 359–369 (1987).
Akinci, M. K. & Schofield, P. R. Widespread expression of GABA(A) receptor subunits in peripheral tissues. Neurosci. Res. 35, 145–153 (1999).
Erdö, S. L., Rosdy, B. & Szporny, L. Higher GABA concentrations in Fallopian tube than in brain of the rat. J. Neurochem. 38, 1174–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb05368.x (1982).
Schaeffer, J. M. & Hsueh, A. J. W. Identification of gamma-aminobutyric acid and its binding sites in the rat ovary. Life Sci. 30, 1599–1604 (1982).
Louzan, P., Gallardo, M. G. P. & Tramezzani, J. H. Gamma-aminobutyric acid in the genital tract of the rat during the oestrous cycle. J. Reprod. Fertil. 77, 499–504 (1986).
László, Á., Nádasy, G. L., Monos, E., Zsolnai, B. & Erdö, S. L. The GABAergic system in human female genital organs. In GABA Outside the CNS 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76915-3_13 (1992).
Erdő, S. L. Alteration of GABA levels in ovary and fallopian tube of the pregrant rat. Life Sci. 34, 1879–1884 (1984).
Putnam, C. D., Brann, D. W., Kolbeck, R. C. & Mahesh, V. B. Inhibition of uterine contractility by progesterone and progesterone metabolites: Mediation by progesterone and gamma amino butyric acid(A) receptor systems. Biol. Reprod. 45, 266–272 (1991).
Majewska, M. D. & Vaupel, D. B. Steroid control of uterine motility via γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors in the rabbit: A novel mechanism?. J. Endocrinol. 131, 427–434 (1991).
Fujii, E. & Mellon, S. H. Regulation of uterine γ-aminobutyric acidA receptor subunit expression throughout pregnancy. Endocrinology 142, 1770–1777 (2001).
Erdõ, S. L., Varga, B. & Horváth, E. Effect of local GABA administration on rat ovarian blood flow, and on progesterone and estradiol secretion. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 111, 397–400 (1985).
Johnston, G. A. Advantages of an antagonist: Bicuculline and other GABA antagonists. Br. J. Pharmacol. 169, 328 (2013).
Sophion Bioscience. Ligand gated ion channels: GABA A receptor pharmacology on QPatch. Sophion Appl. Rep. 32, 4–6 (2018).
Bormann, J. The ‘ABC’ of GABA receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 16–19 (2000).
Olsen, R. W. & Sieghart, W. International union of pharmacology. LXX. Subtypes of γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors: Classification on the basis of subunit composition, pharmacology, and function. Pharmacol. Rev. 60, 243–260 (2008).
Belelli, D., Hales, T. G., Lambert, J. J., Luscher, B., Olsen, R., Peters, J. A. et al. GABAA receptors (version 2019.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS guide to pharmacology Database. In IUPHAR/BPS Guid to Pharmacol CITE 2019 (2019).
Martin, G. G., Talbot, P. & Pendergrass, P. An intrabursal injection procedure for the in vivo study of ovulation in hamsters. J. Exp. Zool. 216, 461–468 (1981).
Zhang, H. et al. Hormonal regulation of ovarian bursa fluid in mice and involvement of aquaporins. PLoS One 8, e63823 (2013).
Van der Hoek, K. H. et al. Intrabursal injection of clodronate liposomes causes macrophage depletion and inhibits ovulation in the mouse ovary. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1059–1066 (2000).
Abramovich, D., Irusta, G., Parborell, F. & Tesone, M. Intrabursal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor trap in eCG-treated prepubertal rats inhibits proliferation and increases apoptosis of follicular cells involving the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Fertil. Steril. 93, 1369–1377 (2010).
Woodruff, T. K., Lyon, R. J., Hansen, S. E., Rice, G. C. & Mather, J. P. Inhibin and activin locally regulate rat ovarian folliculogenesis. Endocrinology 127, 3196–3205 (1990).
Shukovski, L. & Tsafriri, A. The involvement of nitric oxide in the ovulatory process in the rat. Endocrinology 135, 2287–2290 (1994).
Vaknin, K. M., Lazar, S., Popliker, M. & Tsafriri, A. Role of meiosis-activating sterols in rat oocyte maturation: Effects of specific inhibitors and changes in the expression of lanosterol 14α-demethylase during the preovulatory period. Biol. Reprod. 64, 299–309 (2001).
Ueno, S., Bracamontes, J., Zorumski, C., Weiss, D. S. & Steinbach, J. H. Bicuculline and gabazine are allosteric inhibitors of channel opening of the GABAA receptor. J. Neurosci. 17, 625 (1997).
Krishek, B. J., Moss, S. J. & Smart, T. G. A functional comparison of the antagonists bicuculline and picrotoxin at recombinant GABAA receptors. Neuropharmacology 35, 1289–1298 (1996).
Karunarathne, W. A. H. M., Choi, Y. H., Lee, M. H., Kang, C. H. & Kim, G. Y. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated bone formation and its implications for anti-osteoporosis strategies: Exploring the relation between GABA and GABA receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 218, 115888 (2023).
Myers, M., Britt, K. L., Wreford, N. G. M., Ebling, F. J. P. & Kerr, J. B. Methods for quantifying follicular numbers within the mouse ovary. Reproduction 127, 569–580 (2004).
Hsueh, A. J. W., Billig, H. & Tsafiri, A. Ovarian follicle atresia: A hormonally controlled apoptotic process. Endocr. Rev. 15, 707–724 (1994).
Fernandois, D., Lara, H. E. & Paredes, A. H. Blocking of β-adrenergic receptors during the subfertile period inhibits spontaneous ovarian cyst formation in rats. Horm. Metab. Res. 44, 682–687 (2012).
McGee, E. A. & Hsueh, A. J. W. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr. Rev. 21, 200–214 (2000).
Markstrom, E., Svensson, E., Shao, R., Svanberg, B. & Billig, H. Survival factors regulating ovarian apoptosis—Dependence on follicle differentiation. Reproduction 123, 23–30 (2002).
Cherry, J. A., Hou, X., Rueda, B. R., Davis, J. S. & Townson, D. H. Microvascular endothelial cells of the bovine corpus luteum: A comparative examination of the estrous cycle and pregnancy. J. Reprod. Dev. 54, 183–191 (2008).
Scotti, L. et al. Local VEGF inhibition prevents ovarian alterations associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 144, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.08.013 (2014).
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45–e45 (2001).
Jamnongjit, M. & Hammes, S. R. Ovarian steroids: The good, the bad, and the signals that raise them. Cell Cycle 5, 1178 (2006).
Smith, M. S., Freeman, M. E. & Neill, J. D. The control of progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle and early pseudopregnancy in the rat: Prolactin, gonadotropin and steroid levels associated with rescue of the corpus luteum of pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology 96, 219–26 (1975).
Andersson, H., Stanislaus, D. & Wood, C. E. Scientific and regulatory policy committee (SRPC) paper: Assessment of circulating hormones in nonclinical toxicity studies III. Female reproductive hormones. Toxicol. Pathol. 41, 921–934 (2013).
Legan, S. J., Coon, G. A. & Karsch, F. J. Role of estrogen as initiator of daily LH surges in the ovariectomized rat. Endocrinology 96, 50–56 (1975).
Arrieta-Cruz, I. et al. Estrogen receptors alpha and beta in POA-AHA region regulate asymmetrically ovulation. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 39, 1139–1149 (2019).
Sarkar, D. K. & Fink, G. Luteinizing hormone releasing factor in pituitary stalk plasma from long-term ovariectomized rats: Effects of steroids. J. Endocrinol. 86, 511–524 (1980).
Micevych, P. et al. The luteinizing hormone surge is preceded by an estrogen-induced increase of hypothalamic progesterone in ovariectomized and adrenalectomized rats. Neuroendocrinology 78, 29–35 (2003).
Evans, N. P., Dahl, G. E., Padmanabhan, V., Thrun, L. A. & Karsch, F. J. Estradiol requirements for induction and maintenance of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone surge: Implications for neuroendocrine processing of the estradiol signal. Endocrinology 138, 5408–5414 (1997).
Hillier, S. G., Reichert, L. E. & Van Hall, E. V. Control of preovulatory follicular estrogen biosynthesis in the human ovary. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 52, 847–856 (1981).
Stocco, C. Aromatase expression in the ovary: Hormonal and molecular regulation. Steroids 73, 473 (2008).
Wuttke, W., Theiling, K., Hinney, B. & Pitzel, L. Regulation of steroid production and its function within the corpus luteum. Steroids 63, 299–305 (1998).
Robker, R. L. & Richards, J. S. Hormone-induced proliferation and differentiation of granulosa cells: A coordinated balance of the cell cycle regulators cyclin D2 and p27(kip1). Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 924–940 (1998).
Oktem, O. et al. FSH Stimulation promotes progesterone synthesis and output from human granulosa cells without luteinization. Hum. Reprod. 32, 643–652 (2017).
Krey, L. C., Tyrey, L. & Everett, J. W. The estrogen-induced advance in the cyclic LH surge in the rat: Dependency on ovarian progesterone secretion. Endocrinology 93, 385–390 (1973).
Liu, Q., Gao, H., Yang, F., Zhang, H. & Zeng, S. FSH promotes progesterone synthesis by enhancing autophagy to accelerate lipid droplet degradation in porcine granulosa cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 626927 (2021).
Wood, J. R. & Strauss, J. F. Multiple signal transduction pathways regulate ovarian steroidogenesis. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 3, 33–46 (2002).
Gladkevich, A., Korf, J., Hakobyan, V. P. & Melkonyan, K. V. The peripheral GABAergic system as a target in endocrine disorders. Auton. Neurosci. 124, 1–8 (2006).
Sato, J., Hashimoto, S., Doi, T., Yamada, N. & Tsuchitani, M. Histological characteristics of the regression of corpora lutea in Wistar Hannover rats: The comparisons with Sprague-Dawley rats. J. Toxicol. Pathol. 27, 107–113 (2014).
Telleria, C. M. Can luteal regression be reversed?. Reprod. Biol.Endocrinol. 4, 53 (2006).
Goyeneche, A. A., Deis, R. P., Gibori, G. & Telleria, C. M. Progesterone promotes survival of the rat corpus luteum in the absence of cognate receptors. Biol. Reprod. 68, 151–158 (2003).
Stocco, C. O. & Deis, R. P. Participation of intraluteal progesterone and prostaglandin F(2α) in LH-induced luteolysis in pregnant rat. J. Endocrinol. 156, 253–259 (1998).
Bowen-Shauver, J. M. & Gibori, G. The corpus luteum of pregnancy. In The Ovary 2nd edn, 201–230 (Elsevier Inc., 2003).
Pelletier, G., Luu-The, V., Li, S., Ren, L. & Labrie, F. Sex-related Expression of 20α-hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase mRNA in the Adult Mouse. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 51, 1425–1436 (2003).
Rothchild, I. The corpus luteum revisited: Are the paradoxical effects of RU486 a clue to how progesterone stimulates its own secretion?. Biol. Reprod. 55, 1–4 (1996).
Telleria, C. M. & Deis, R. P. Effect of RU486 on ovarian progesterone production at pro-oestrus and during pregnancy: A possible dual regulation of the biosynthesis of progesterone. J. Reprod. Fertil. 102, 379–384 (1994).
Kuranaga, E. et al. Fas/Fas ligand system in prolactin-induced apoptosis in rat corpus luteum: Possible role of luteal immune cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260, 167–173 (1999).
Hampl, A., Pacherník, J. & Dvořák, P. Levels and interactions of p27, cyclin D3, and CDK4 during the formation and maintenance of the corpus luteum in mice. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1393–1401 (2000).
Martimbeau, S. & Tilly, J. L. Physiological cell death in endocrine-dependent tissues: An ovarian perspective. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 46, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.00157.x (1997).
Yu, Y. S. et al. Apoptosis in granulosa cells during follicular atresia: Relationship with steroids and insulin-like growth factors. Cell Res. 14, 341–346 (2004).
Faes, R. F., Caldas, M. C., Rosa-e-Silva, A. A. M., Rodrigues, A. & Barbos, J. C. Relationship among nitric oxide, progesterone and estradiol-17 β concentrations in follicular fluid during follicular development in cattle. Anim. Reprod. 4(1), 31–7 (2007).
Meng, L. et al. Characteristics of circular RNA expression profiles of porcine granulosa cells in healthy and atretic antral follicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–25 (2020).
Zhang, J. et al. Initiation of follicular atresia: Gene networks during early atresia in pig ovaries. Reproduction 156, 23–33 (2018).
Franks, S. & Hardy, K. Androgen action in the ovary. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 9, 452 (2018).
Lund, S. A., Murdoch, J., Van Kirk, E. A. & Murdoch, W. J. Mitogenic and antioxidant mechanisms of estradiol action in preovulatory ovine follicles: Relevance to luteal function. Biol. Reprod. 61, 388–392 (1999).
Pierre, A. et al. Estradiol regulates mRNA levels of estrogen receptor beta 4 and beta 5 isoforms and modulates human granulosa cell apoptosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 5046 (2021).
Regan, S. L. P. et al. Granulosa cell apoptosis in the ovarian follicle: A changing view. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 9, 326746 (2018).
Peluso, J. J. Progesterone as a regulator of granulosa cell viability. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 85(2–5), 167–173 (2003).
Dierschke, D. J., Chaffin, C. L. & Hutz, R. J. Role and site of estrogen action in follicular atresia. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 5, 215–219 (1994).
Komatsu, K. & Masubuchi, S. The concentration-dependent effect of progesterone on follicle growth in the mouse ovary. J. Reprod. Dev. 63, 271–277 (2017).
Cesetti, T., Ciccolini, F. & Li, Y. GABA not only a neurotransmitter: Osmotic regulation by GABA AR signaling. Front. Cell Neurosci. 6, 3 (2012).
Kondratskyi, A., Kondratska, K., Skryma, R. & Prevarskaya, N. Ion channels in the regulation of apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 10, 2532–2546 (1848).
Reynolds, L. P., Derek, S., Ll Eat, K. & Redmer, D. A. Angiogenesis in the female reproductive system. FASEB J. 6, 886–892. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.6.3.1371260 (1992).
Hazzard, T. M. & Stouffer, R. L. Angiogenesis in ovarian follicular and luteal development. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 14, 883–900 (2000).
Redmer, D. A. & Reynolds, L. P. Angiogenesis in the ovary. Rev. Reprod. 1, 182–192 (1996).
Feng, Y. et al. CLARITY reveals dynamics of ovarian follicular architecture and vasculature in three-dimensions. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).
Dharmarajan, A. M., Bruce, N. W. & Meyer, G. T. Quantitative ultrastructural characteristics relating to transport between luteal cell cytoplasm and blood in the corpus luteum of the pregnant rat. Am. J. Anat. 172, 87–99 (1985).
Fraser, H. M. & Lunn, S. F. Angiogenesis and its control in the female reproductive system. Br. Med. Bull. 56, 787–797 (2000).
Plendl, J. Angiogenesis and vascular regression in the ovary. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 29, 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0264.2000.00265.x (2000).
Choi, Y. K. & Vasudevan, A. Endothelial GABA signaling: A phoenix awakened. Aging 10, 859 (2018).
Li, S. et al. Endothelial cell-derived GABA signaling modulates neuronal migration and postnatal behavior. Cell Res. 28, 221–248 (2018).
Baruah, J., Vasudevan, A. & Köhling, R. Vascular integrity and signaling determining brain development, network excitability, and epileptogenesis. Front. Physiol. 10, 1583 (2020).
Erdö, S. L. GABA Outside the CNS (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992).
Faroni, A. & Magnaghi, V. The neurosteroid allopregnanolone modulates specific functions in central and peripheral glial cells. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2, 12813 (2011).
Pinna, G. Allopregnanolone (1938–2019): A trajectory of 80 years of outstanding scientific achievements. Neurobiol. Stress 13, 100246 (2020).
Staley, K. & Scharfman, H. A woman’s prerogative. Nat. Neurosci. 8(6), 697–699 (2005).
Follesa, P. et al. Allopregnanolone synthesis in cerebellar granule cells: Roles in regulation of GABA(A) receptor expression and function during progesterone treatment and withdrawal. Mol. Pharmacol. 57, 1262–1270 (2000).
Mostallino, M. C. et al. Changes in expression of the δ subunit of the GABAA receptor and in receptor function induced by progesterone exposure and withdrawal. J. Neurochem. 99, 321–332 (2006).
Concas, A. et al. Role of brain allopregnanolone in the plasticity of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor in rat brain during pregnancy and after delivery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13284–13289 (1998).
Gulinello, M., Gong, Q. H., Li, X. & Smith, S. S. Short-term exposure to a neuroactive steroid increases α4 GABAA receptor subunit levels in association with increased anxiety in the female rat. Brain Res. 910, 55 (2001).
Lovick, T. A. Plasticity of GABAA receptor subunit expression during the oestrous cycle of the rat: Implications for premenstrual syndrome in women. Exp. Physiol. 91, 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032342 (2006).
Ebert, B. et al. Differences in agonist/antagonist binding affinity and receptor transduction using recombinant human γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 1150–1156 (1997).
Maitra, R. & Reynolds, J. N. Subunit dependent modulation of GABA(A) receptor function by neuroactive steroids. Brain Res. 819, 75–82 (1999).
Belelli, D., Casula, A., Ling, A. & Lambert, J. J. The influence of subunit composition on the interaction of neurosteroids with GABAA receptors. Neuropharmacology 43, 651–661 (2002).
Pirker, S., Schwarzer, C., Wieselthaler, A., Sieghart, W. & Sperk, G. GABA(A) receptors: Immunocytochemical distribution of 13 subunits in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience 101, 815–850 (2000).
Sperk, G. et al. Immunohistochemical distribution of 10 GABAA receptor subunits in the forebrain of the rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta. J. Comp. Neurol. 528, 2551–2568. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24910 (2020).
Salvetti, N. R. et al. Cell proliferation and survival mechanisms underlying the abnormal persistence of follicular cysts in bovines with cystic ovarian disease induced by ACTH. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 122, 98–110 (2010).
Cooke, G. M., Brawer, J. R. & Farookhi, R. Steroidogenic enzyme activities in rat polycystic ovaries. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 71, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1139/y93-039 (2011).
Ullah, A. et al. Protective effects of GABA against metabolic and reproductive disturbances in letrozole induced polycystic ovarian syndrome in rats. J. Ovarian Res. 10, 1–8 (2017).
Di Pietro, M., Pascuali, N., Parborell, F. & Abramovich, D. Ovarian angiogenesis in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reproduction 155, R199-209. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0597 (2018).
Funding
This study was funded by Universidad de Mendoza, PICTO/UUMM 2019-00022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.R.R.C. wrote the main manuscript, performed all the experiments and data analysis. D.A.C., M.A.S. and I.M.B. assisted as blind counters for the experiments and helped with the surgical process. F.D.C.C. and G.B.R. helped with the histological processes and CLIA measurements. L.S., J.H. and F.P. helped to perform several immunohistochemistry experiments and assisted in its quantification. M.R.L. guided the experiments, the data analysis, and the manuscript writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cáceres, A.R.R., Cardone, D.A., Sanhueza, M. et al. Local effect of allopregnanolone in rat ovarian steroidogenesis, follicular and corpora lutea development. Sci Rep 14, 6402 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57102-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57102-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.