Xenopus Ssbp2 is required for embryonic pronephros morphogenesis and terminal differentiation

Cervino, Ailen S.; Collodel, Mariano G.; Lopez, Ivan A.; Roa, Carolina; Hochbaum, Daniel; Hukriede, Neil A.; Cirio, M. Cecilia

doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43662-1

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 04 October 2023

Xenopus Ssbp2 is required for embryonic pronephros morphogenesis and terminal differentiation

Ailen S. Cervino¹,
Mariano G. Collodel¹,
Ivan A. Lopez¹,
Carolina Roa¹,
Daniel Hochbaum²,
Neil A. Hukriede³ &
…
M. Cecilia Cirio¹

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 16671 (2023) Cite this article

1097 Accesses
6 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The nephron, functional unit of the vertebrate kidney, is specialized in metabolic wastes excretion and body fluids osmoregulation. Given the high evolutionary conservation of gene expression and segmentation patterning between mammalian and amphibian nephrons, the Xenopus laevis pronephric kidney offers a simplified model for studying nephrogenesis. The Lhx1 transcription factor plays several roles during embryogenesis, regulating target genes expression by forming multiprotein complexes with LIM binding protein 1 (Ldb1). However, few Lhx1-Ldb1 cofactors have been identified for kidney organogenesis. By tandem- affinity purification from kidney-induced Xenopus animal caps, we identified single-stranded DNA binding protein 2 (Ssbp2) interacts with the Ldb1–Lhx1 complex. Ssbp2 is expressed in the Xenopus pronephros, and knockdown prevents normal morphogenesis and differentiation of the glomus and the convoluted renal tubules. We demonstrate a role for a member of the Ssbp family in kidney organogenesis and provide evidence of a fundamental function for the Ldb1–Lhx1-Ssbp transcriptional complexes in embryonic development.

The enpp4 ectonucleotidase regulates kidney patterning signalling networks in Xenopus embryos

Article Open access 07 October 2021

The zebrafish paralog six2b is required for early proximal pronephros morphogenesis

Article Open access 11 November 2023

Hnf1b renal expression directed by a distal enhancer responsive to Pax8

Article Open access 19 November 2022

Introduction

The vertebrate kidney is a specialized excretory organ with a key role in osmoregulation and metabolic and drug waste removal. During development, the kidney emerges bilaterally from the intermediate mesoderm and develops through a series of progressively more complex forms, the pronephros, mesonephros and metanephros, the latter only found in mammals, birds, and reptiles. All of them share the same basic structural and functional unit called the nephron consisting of a filtration unit, the glomerulus in integrated and the glomus in non-integrated nephrons, the renal tubule, subdivided into proximal and distal segments and the connecting tubule^1,2. Formation of each kidney is induced by the preceding nephric tissue leading to an increased organizational complexity^3,4. While the functional pronephros of amphibian and fish embryos is composed of two nephrons, the metanephros of the adult amniotes is composed of many nephrons, approximately 1 million in humans⁵. Despite anatomical differences, many genes and processes that govern pronephros formation are conserved in individual metanephric nephrons development^6,7,8. The functional Xenopus laevis pronephros offers a simplified model for the study of nephron development and human kidney diseases^9,10,11,12.

Signaling pathways and transcriptional regulators involved in early kidney specification have been systematically investigated, however less is known about downstream effectors required for nephric patterning and morphogenesis. In this regard, the role of the LIM-class homeobox transcription factor Lhx1 is essential for kidney development^13,14,15,16. However, in this tissue, few Lhx1 interacting proteins and downstream targets have been identified^16,17. Lhx1 binding to LIM domain binding protein 1, Ldb1, through the LIM domains results in the formation of a tetrameric base-complex, which regulates gene expression through the formation of multiprotein transcriptional complexes with crucial roles during development^{14,15,16,18,19,20}. We identified Ldb1–Lhx1 binding proteins by tandem affinity purification assay in a Xenopus kidney cell line¹⁷ and now in kidney-induced animal explants. Here, we characterized a candidate from this approach, single-stranded DNA binding protein 2 (Ssbp2), which was found to interact with the Ldb1–Lhx1 complex in kidney cells.

Ssbp genes are evolutionarily conserved from Drosophila to humans^21,22. Structurally, all three Ssbp vertebrate’s proteins (Ssbp2-4) contain a proline-rich transactivation domain²³ and a LUFS domain required for nuclear localization, homotetramerization and interaction with Ldb proteins^24,25. Ssbp proteins bind and stabilize Ldb proteins from proteasomal degradation, therefore promoting their transcriptional function in multiple developmental processes, including wing development in Drosophila, axis formation in Xenopus and head morphogenesis in mice and Xenopus^22,25,26,27. In mammals, Ssbp2 acts as tumor suppressor protein in several cancers including leukemia²⁷, pancreatic cancer²⁸, prostate cancer²⁹, oligodendroglioma³⁰, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma³¹, highlighting roles in malignant transformation. Ssbp2 knockout mice are born at lower frequency than expected and die prematurely. Analysis of surviving Ssbp2 null mice at 60–80 weeks of age revealed that in addition to formation of carcinomas and lymphomas in multiple organs, chronic glomerular nephropathy was a significant finding in these mice²⁷. However, Ssbp2 roles in kidney development have not been explored.

Here, we identify a protein of the Ssbp family in interaction with the Ldb1–Lhx1 transcriptional complex and demonstrate the importance of Ssbp2 in pronephric kidney development of Xenopus laevis. In this model system, ssbp2 is expressed in the kidney anlage, glomus and pronephric tubules. Ssbp2 knockdown experiments demonstrate defective tubule morphogenesis and glomus development, revealing a previously undescribed function in kidney organogenesis.

Results

Ssbp2 interacts with Ldb1–Lhx1 in kidney-induced animal cap explants

To identify candidate partners associated with the constitutive-active transcriptional complex Ldb1–Lhx1 involved in nephrogenesis, we previously applied a tandem-affinity purification (TAP) approach using Xenopus renal A6 epithelial kidney cells¹⁷. The Ldb1–Lhx1 constitutive-active construct (LLCA) is a fusion of the Ldb1 dimerization domain with the linker, C-terminal and homeodomain of Lhx1¹⁹. Here we employed an in vitro system inducing pronephric tissues by treatment of Xenopus animal cap explants with retinoic acid (RA) and activin^32,33,34 and applied the same purification protocol¹⁷. Following injection of 2-cell stage embryos with TAP-LLCA mRNA, animal caps were dissected, treated with activin and RA, and protein complexes isolated through TAP (Supp. Fig. S1a). We subjected samples to nano-liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC-MS/MS) and identified 42 proteins exclusively associated with TAP-LLCA (Supp. Fig. S1b). Among those proteins, seven are expressed during Xenopus pronephros development³⁵ (Supp. Fig. S1b). Interestingly, single-stranded DNA binding protein 2 (Ssbp2) was also identified in our previously published experimental approach¹⁷ (Supp. Fig. S1b). While association of Ssbp proteins and Ldb1–Lhx1 regulates axis and head development^{21,36,37,38,39}, Ssbp2 function in this ternary core complex has not been reported in kidney organogenesis.

Ssbp2 is expressed during development of the Xenopus pronephros

To investigate a role for Ssbp2 in Xenopus pronephros formation, we initially assessed its expression pattern by whole mount in situ hybridization (WISH). Ssbp2 transcripts were detected in the circumblastoporal region of the gastrula (Fig. 1a), in the eye field, neural folds, and prospective olfactory placode in early neurula (Fig. 1b–d). In late neurula, ssbp2 is expressed in the neural tube and somites (Fig. 1e–h). Section of the late neurula revealed weak staining in the intermediate and lateral plate mesoderm (Fig. 1g’). Ssbp2 expression in early tailbuds becomes restricted to the head, notochord, neural tube and somites. Furthermore, discernible ssbp2 expression is detected in the pronephric anlage (Fig. 1i–m’). At later stages, ssbp2 is also present in the branchial arches and the ventral blood islands (Fig. 1n,q). In the pronephros, ssbp2 mRNAs are detected in the glomus, and in the proximal and distal tubules (Fig. 1n–s’). These results indicate that ssbp2 transcripts are present throughout Xenopus pronephric kidney development, being first detected in early tailbud stages.

Knockdown of Ssbp2 leads to abnormal pronephros

To test Ssbp2 function in kidney development, we performed loss-of-function experiments targeting both pseudo-alleles of ssbp2 mRNA with a translation blocking morpholino oligonucleotide (ssbp2-MO) (Fig. 2a). In the absence of an antibody recognizing Xenopus Ssbp2 protein, we tested the efficacy of ssbp2-MO injecting 2-cell stage embryos with a fusion mRNA containing the full-length ssbp2 cDNA in frame with eGFP (ssbp2-eGFP) (Supp. Fig. S2a). Ssbp2-eGFP mRNA was injected alone or co-injected with a standard morpholino control (St-MO) or ssbp2-MO. While fluorescence was detected in ssbp2-eGFP and ssbp2-eGFP + St-MO injected embryos, it was not detected upon coinjection of ssbp2-eGFP + ssbp2-MO (Supp. Fig. S2b–e).

We evaluated the effect of ssbp2 knockdown in pronephros formation injecting ssbp2-MO in one V2 blastomere of 8-cell stage embryos (1 × V2)⁴⁰ targeting one nephron and allowing us to compare injected and uninjected sides of the same embryo as the scoring system. We assessed β1-NaK-ATPase expression, marker of differentiated pronephric tubule, by WISH. We observed a dose-dependent increase in the number of embryos exhibiting a reduction in the β1-NaK-ATPase expression domain specifically in the proximal tubules (Fig. 2b). These affected embryos were scored and categorized as "affected” (Fig. 2b). Notably, ssbp2 knockdown seems to have a strong effect in development of the proximal tubule, while the other segments appear not affected. Injecting 15 ng of ssbp2-MO resulted in 74% of the embryos with affected pronephros without evidence of toxicity and so selected as experimental dose. By contrast, injecting 15 ng of St-MO resulted in significantly fewer affected embryos (Fig. 2b). The phenotype specificity was verified by coinjecting ssbp2-MO and ssbp2*Δ mRNA. The ssbp2*Δ mRNA has a deletion of 15 nucleotides following ssbp2 first ATG, preventing binding of the morpholino (Fig. 2a). Importantly, ssbp2*Δ mRNA coinjection significantly restores normal β1-NaK-ATPase expression in the proximal tubule of embryos, demonstrating the specificity of ssbp2-MO (Fig. 2b).

To assess kidney function, we analyzed edema formation in tadpoles as defects in pronephros development have been reported to cause edema in Xenopus^41,42. Embryos were injected with ssbp2-MO or St-MO in both ventral blastomeres of 4-cell stage embryos to target the tissues that will give rise to the kidney⁴³. Uninjected and St-MO injected tadpoles (stage 45) presented low incidences of edema formation (1% and 11%, respectively), whereas 38% of ssbp2-MO injected tadpoles developed edema (Fig. 2c–e). Together, these experiments suggest that Ssbp2 loss-of-function results in defective pronephros formation and altered kidney function.

Ssbp2 is not essential for specification of the pronephric field but necessary for morphogenesis

In Xenopus, lhx1 knockdown impairs specification of the entire kidney field affecting expression of genes from glomus, proximal and distal kidney segments¹⁶. To understand Ssbp2 role in pronephric development, we analyzed by WISH pax8 expression in the early pronephric field. Pax8 is a transcription factor essential for the earliest steps of vertebrate pronephric development and together with lhx1 are among the earliest genes expressed in the kidney primordium^44,45. Injection of ssbp2-MO did not alter pax8 expression domain relative to the control uninjected side (Supp. Fig. S3a–c). We also evaluated osr2 (odd-skipped related transcription factor 2) expression in the pronephric field as its expression precedes activation of the early pronephric markers pax8 and lhx1^44,46. The expression domain of ors2 was not affected in most ssbp2-MO injected embryos (Supp. Fig. S3d–e), indicating that Ssbp2 function is not essential for renal progenitor cell field specification.

However, since ssbp2 is first expressed in the pronephric anlage at stage 23, we wanted to assess if Ssbp2 is required to kidney morphogenesis. At stage 26, we observed changes in the pronephric anlage revealed by pax8 WISH on the ssbp2-MO injected side compared to the uninjected contralateral side (Supp. Fig. S4e–h). Conversely, there were no differences seen in control St-MO injected or uninjected embryos (Supp. Fig. S4a–d). These finding suggest that Ssbp2 might be implicated in pronephros morphogenesis.

Ssbp2 is required for glomus development

Expression of ssbp2 was detected in the glomus at tailbud stages (Fig. 1). As readout of glomus and podocytes development and differentiation, we analyzed ssbp2 depleted embryos for the transcription factor wt1 (Wilm’s tumor suppressor 1) (Fig. 3a–e), and the podocytes differentiation marker nphs1 (nephrin) at stage 35, before podocytes function begins⁴⁷ (Fig. 3f–j). The expression domains of both analyzed genes exhibited a slight reduction on the ssbp2-MO injected side (Fig. 3e,j,o). The quantification of these markers expression area in the glomus region revealed a significant reduction in ssbp2-MO injected embryos compared to control groups (Fig. 3n,o). As the glomus is the deepest structure of the pronephros, histological transverse sections were prepared to assess in more detail its morphology (Fig. 3k,l,m). Sections of nphs1 WISH revealed that while the structure of the glomus was similar in kidneys of control embryos (Fig. 3k,l), expression of nphs1 was reduced in embryos unilaterally injected with ssbp2-MO (Fig. 3m). Together, these results indicate that in the pronephros, Ssbp2 is necessary for normal glomus development.

Ssbp2 depletion impairs tubule morphogenesis without affecting somites development

Ssbp2 is expressed in the paraxial mesoderm (Fig. 1) and interactions between developing somites and pronephros influence patterning of both tissues^{16,48,49,50,51,52}. Therefore, we asked whether the pronephric phenotype observed in ssbp2-depleted embryos is secondary to somites developmental defects. Immunostaining with the muscle-specific antibody 12/101⁵³ showed no differences in somite morphology between controls (uninjected and St-MO injected) and ssbp2-MO injected embryos (Fig. 4a–f), suggesting that defects associated with Ssbp2 loss-of-function in the pronephros are not the result of alterations in paraxial mesoderm development.

To characterize the pronephric tubule defects associated with Ssbp2 loss-of-function, we performed a quantification of the total tubular convoluted surface in embryos subjected to β1-NaK-ATPase WISH (Fig. 4). We established that ssbp2 knockdown led to less convoluted proximal and distal tubule resulting in a significant reduction of the tubular surface (Fig. 4e,f,i). Importantly, this phenotype was rescued by ssbp2*Δ mRNA coinjection (Fig. 4g–i) demonstrating ssbp2-MO specificity.

Next, we investigated the tubulogenesis defect by analyzing expression of specific tubular segment markers. The proximal tubule assessed by slc5a1 (sodium/glucose cotransporter) expression appeared smaller in size relative to the uninjected side and to St-MO injected embryos (Fig. 5f–j). Additionally, we looked in tailbud stages at lhx1 and pax8, as expression of these genes becomes restricted to the pronephric tubule during kidney morphogenesis. We observed a reduced expression domain of lhx1 and pax8 in the proximal tubule upon ssbp2 depletion (Supp. Fig. S5d,e and 4i,j), while significantly fewer embryos were affected in uninjected and St-MO injected groups (Supp. Fig. S5a–c and f–h). Analysis of distal tubule development by WISH against clcnkb (chloride channel) established that ssbp2 knockdown led to reduced tubule size (Fig. 5k–o). To confirm this observation, we measured the length of the most anterior hoxb7 (homeobox B7) expression domain in the distal tubule of stage 32 embryos. The evaluation revealed that this tubule segment was significantly shorter on the ssbp2-depleted side relative to the control side of the same embryo (Supp. Fig. S5k–p), while the connecting tubule appeared unaffected.

In Xenopus, the pronephric tubule branches at its most proximal end to generate three ciliated structures called nephrostomes that receive fluid derived from the coelom⁵². As shown with pax2 and lhx1 expression, the spatial arrangement of nephrostomes was altered by ssbp2 knockdown, providing additional evidence of defective proximal tubule morphogenesis (Fig. 5a–e; Supp. Fig. S5a–d). Taken together, these results show that while all components of the tubule are present in depleted embryos, Ssbp2 function is required for normal morphogenesis of the proximal and distal tubule segments.

Depletion of Ssbp2 impairs pronephros terminal differentiation

Immunostaining with 3G8 and 4A6 antibodies were conducted to assess differentiated proximal tubules (stage 37/38 embryos) and distal and connecting tubules (stage 42 embryos), respectively⁵² (Fig. 6). 3G8 staining revealed a reduced proximal convoluted tubule in the ssbp2-MO injected side relative to the uninjected side of the embryo (Fig. 6e–f) and relative to control treatments (Fig. 6a–d). To quantify the extent of pronephric proximal tubule development we calculated the pronephric index (PNI)⁵⁴. The PNI value is expressed as the number of tubule components on the uninjected side (left, Fig. 6a’,c’,e’) minus the number on the injected side (right, Fig. 6b’,d’,f’) of the embryo. Thus, significant reduction of the tubule components by experimental treatments results in high PNI values whereas treatments causing little, or no effect result in low numbers (Fig. 6g). The PNI scoring was significantly greater in ssbp2-depleted embryos than in St-MO and uninjected embryos (Fig. 6g). Further, 3G8 staining revealed that the proximal tubules of depleted embryos had shorter branches than St-MO and uninjected animals (Fig. 6a–f). Staining of distal and connecting tubules with 4A6 antibody also showed a reduction in distal tubule size in the ssbp2-MO injected side relative to the uninjected side (Fig. 6l,m) and control treatments (Fig. 6h–k). Histological sections confirmed reduced staining and convolution of the distal tubule because of ssbp2 knockdown (Fig. 6n), while the connecting tubules appear unaffected (Fig. 6o). Taken together and in agreement with our previous evidence (Figs. 4, 5 and Supp. Fig. S5), Ssbp2 loss-of-function impairs proximal and distal tubule terminal differentiation.

Discussion

Understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for kidney specification and morphogenesis is fundamental to comprehend the etiology of renal diseases. In this study our goal was to identify interacting partners of the Ldb1–Lhx1 transcriptional complex, with a conserved and essential role in nephric development. The tetrameric Ldb1–Lhx1 complex is required for cell fate acquisition, embryonic patterning, and organ development. Regulation of its transcriptional function and expression of target genes is thought to be modulated by accessory proteins⁵⁵. Here, we use a simple and efficient kidney induction assay^{32,33,34,56,57} to identify binding partners of the Ldb1–Lhx1 complex employing our previously published TAP assay followed by LC–MS/MS¹⁷. Among the identified proteins, several of the mRNAs are present in the Xenopus pronephric kidney (tubal3.1, tubb4a, hspd1, hspa1b, slc25a11, etfa, prdx1)³⁵. Validation and functional analysis of these candidate interactors might uncover new proteins with roles in kidney organogenesis. We focused this study on Ssbp2 since we identified it as a binding partner in Xenopus renal epithelial cells¹⁷ and here in the ex vivo kidney-induction assay. Additionally, Ssbp proteins have been found to physically interact with Ldb1²¹. This interaction involves the LUFS domain of Ssbp protein and the LCCD domain (Ldb1-Chip conserved domain) of Ldb1²². Since the TAP-LLCA construct contains the LCCD domain in Ldb1 fragment, we speculate Ssbp2 interacts with constitutively-active Ldb1–Lhx1 through this region. Previously, Ssbp2 was found to bind Ldb1 in a yeast two-hybrid screening and with complexes containing Lhx1 in a mouse carcinoma cell line^22,36. Our TAP results provide further evidence of this physical interaction.

The ability of Ssbp proteins to stabilized Ldb1 and enhance the transactivating function of the Ldb1–Lhx1 complex has been well documented^{19,21,25,29,33,37} and genetic interactions between Ldb, (LIM binding domain), LIM and Ssbp proteins have been previously shown in Drosophila^21,22, Xenopus²¹ and mice^37,38. Critical to this complex formation is the maintenance of protein stoichiometry. In fact, excess of free Ldb1 (not associated with Lhx1) is targeted for proteasome degradation⁵⁸. Ssbp functions suppressing this degradation, maintaining the stoichiometry between Ldb1, Lhx1 and Ssbp²⁶. Based on our loss-of-function experiments, we can speculate that Ssbp2 knockdown is directly altering the complex stoichiometry and indirectly reducing Ldb1 protein abundance, perturbing the complex assembly. Future efforts will focus on uncovering Ssbp2 molecular mechanism and how it is related to the Ldb1–Lhx1 complex regulation.

We describe for the first time the ssbp2 expression pattern in developing Xenopus embryos. In agreement with Ssbp2 knockout mice occasionally displaying smaller heads, in Xenopus embryos we detected ssbp2 transcripts in dorsal midline tissues and head structures. The evidence suggests a role of Ssbp2 in development of anterior-head structures and a possible functional redundancy with Ssbp3 in these tissues⁵⁹. Importantly, we detected by WISH the presence of ssbp2 mRNA transcripts throughout stages of pronephros development. Weak staining for ssbp2 mRNA in the intermediate mesoderm contrasts with that of lhx1, highly expressed in this tissue from which renal progenitors originate^16,45,60. However, this observation and our loss-of-function assays indicate that Ssbp2 might not be required for kidney field specification.

As the pronephros develops, ssbp2 is expressed in the pronephric anlage of stage 23 embryos, and later, in the glomus and pronephric tubule, similar to ldb1 and lhx1^16,45,58,60. Our ssbp2 expression results agree with a recent single-cell sequencing analysis of Xenopus tadpole pronephros, where this mRNA was found to be enriched in the glomus². Moreover, our findings and the identification of SSBP2 as a human glomerular-enriched gene⁶¹ argue in favor of this protein having an evolutionarily conserved role in glomerulus/glomus development and function.

We demonstrate that ssbp2 targeted knockdown in blastomeres contributing to pronephric tissues leads to defects in pronephros development. Importantly, rescue experiments coinjecting ssbp2 mRNA, prove that the observed phenotype is specific to Ssbp2 loss-of-function. While our evidence points to the fact that this protein is not essential for pronephric field specification, abnormal glomus formation in depleted embryos is consistent with the identification of chronic glomerular nephropathy in surviving adult Ssbp2 null mice²⁷. In the pronephros, Ssbp2, along with Ldb1 and Lhx1⁹, likely plays important roles in glomus development. Moreover, it might potentially participate in transcriptional complexes alongside another Ldb1-interacting protein, Lmx1b, which is also crucial for glomus development⁶². Dissecting Ssbp2 function in the glomus formation will require identification of its role in the podocytes transcriptional network.

Interestingly, proximal tubules branching was impaired upon ssbp2 depletion as well as normal elongation of the distal tubule. Staining of differentiated proximal (3G8) and distal (4A6) regions of the tubule revealed reduced morphogenesis and differentiation of these segments. These morphological defects in the pronephric tubules and the observed glomus alterations in ssbp2-depleted embryos are likely impeding the normal fluid flow through the kidney tubules and thereby contributing to edema formation.

While lhx1 knockdown impairs specification of the entire kidney field dramatically reducing expression of nephrogenic factors, ssbp2 depletion has only mild effects on early pronephric field marker genes. Given that unlike lhx1^16,45, ssbp2 mRNAs were not detected in the intermediate mesoderm at the time renal progenitors are specified; this result is not unexpected. Differences between lhx1¹⁶ and ssbp2 knockdown embryos might be due to the requirement of different binding partners by Ldb1–Lhx1 throughout kidney development. In this regard, we have described a functional interaction between LLCA and Fry protein, regulating miRNAs levels and driving kidney field specification. This is not unheard of, as transcription factors have different roles based upon the binding partners found in their transcriptional complexes^63,64.

Evidence from other Ssbp-Ldb1–Lhx1 complexes in Xenopus⁶⁵ and mice⁶³ support the idea that this core complex function is driven by different binding partners likely temporally and spatially restricted, recruited for control of specific gene networks and developmental programs. However, another possibility is that other Ssbp family proteins exert a compensatory role reducing the effect of Ssbp2 depletion, this hypothesis will require further investigation.

Molecular interactions between Ssbp and Ldb proteins are evolutionarily ancient ^22,61 and supply a fundamental function in transcription regulation, constituting a complex widely used among eukaryotes with roles in cell differentiation, cell identity, and tissue-specific gene regulation. Here we show that Ssbp2, a member of the Ssbp family, physically interacts with constitutively-active Ldb1–Lhx1 in Xenopus kidney-induced cells. With functional studies we demonstrate its requirement for normal pronephric kidney morphogenesis and differentiation.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the NIH and the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org/). The animal care protocol was approved by the Comisión Institucional para el Cuidado y Uso de Animales de Laboratorio (CICUAL) of the School of Applied and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (Protocol #64).

Xenopus embryos preparation

Xenopus laevis embryos were obtained by natural mating. Adult frog’s reproductive behavior was induced by injection of human chorionic gonadotropin hormone. Eggs were collected, de-jellied in 3% cysteine (pH 8.0), maintained in 0.1X Marc’s Modified Ringer’s (MMR) solution and staged according to Nieuwkoop and Faber⁶⁶. The embryos were placed in 3% ficoll prepared in 1X MMR for microinjection.

Animal caps and Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP)

2-cell stage embryos were injected into the animal pole of both blastomeres with 1 ng of TAP.LLCA mRNA and allowed to develop until stage 8. To induce explanted animal caps into pronephric tissue, dissected animal caps from injected and uninjected sibling embryos were cultured in 1X Steinberg’s solution for 6 h in the presence of 10 ng/ml activin (Sigma, A4941) and 1X 10^–4 M retinoic acid (RA) (Sigma, R2625), then washed in 1X Steinberg’s solution, and snap-freeze for later use. Approximately 300 animal caps from 7 independent experiments were collected and processed for TAP following manufacturer’s instructions (InterPlay Mammalian TAP System, Agilent Technologies). Samples subjected to TAP were sent for identification of proteins by nanoLC/MS/MS to MS Bioworks, LLC (Ann Arbor, MI) and processed as previously described¹⁷. The results were analyzed by the Scaffold software. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD041761.

Plasmid constructs for mRNA synthesis

pCS2 + .TAP.LLCA construct has been previously described¹⁷. pCS2 + .ssbp2.eGFP was made by PCR amplification of full-length ssbp2 cDNA from pCMV.Sport6.ssbp2 (Dharmacon) plasmid and cloned in frame 5’ of the eGFP into pCS2 + .eGFP digested with NcoI and BamHI. For rescue experiments we made the pCS2 + .ssbp2*Δ construct that lacks 15 nucleotides following the ATG. This construct was made by PCR amplification from pCMV.Sport6.ssbp2 and cloned into pCS2 + as a BamHI/EcoRI fragment. Constructs were verified by sequencing.

Primers for cloning ssbp2*Δ into pCS2 +

ssbp2*Δ: 5’-AAGGATCCATGAGTAACAGCGTACC-3’.

ssbp2.R: 5’-AAAGAATTCTCACACGCTCATTGTCATGCTAGG-3’.

Primers for cloning ssbp2 cDNA into pCS2 + .eGFP.

ssbp2GFP.F: 5'-AAAGGATCCAGCATGTACGCCAAAGGCAAG-3'.

ssbp2GFP.R: 5'-AAACCATGGCCACGCTCATTGTCATGCTAGG-3'.

mRNA and morpholinos microinjections

Capped mRNA for ssbp2-GFP and ssbp2*Δ were transcribed in vitro using the AmpliCap SP6 High Yield Message Marker Kit (Cellscript) following linearization with HindIII and NotI, respectively. For Ssbp2-depletion studies, an Ssbp2 morpholino oligonucleotide (ssbp2-MO) (Gene Tools, LLC; 5’-TTACTCTTGCCTTTGGCGTACATGC-3’) that prevents the translation of both ssbp2 pseudo-alleles (ssbp2.S/L) mRNAs was used. A Morpholino Standard Control oligo (St-MO) was used as a negative control (Gene Tools, LLC; 5'-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3'). To confirm the specificity of ssbp2-MO, both blastomeres of 2-cell stage embryos were injected into the animal pole with 1 ng ssbp2-eGFP mRNA in the presence or absence of St-MO or ssbp2-MO. Embryos were screened for green fluorescence at stage 10.5. To study pronephros development, 8-cell stage embryos were injected into one of the V2 blastomeres (1 × V2)⁴⁰. To evaluate edema formation 4-cell stage embryos were injected into both ventral blastomeres (2 × V). Embryos were injected with 10–30 ng of ssbp2-MO, 15–30 ng of St-MO and 25 pg of ssbp2*Δ mRNA per embryo.

In situ hybridization and immunostaining

Whole-mount in situ hybridization was carried out as previously described⁶⁷. Pax8 (gift from Tom Carroll), β1-NaK-ATPase, nphs1 (gift from Oliver Wessely), slc5a1, clcnkb (gift from Rachel Miller) and lhx1 were linearized as previously described^16,41,68,69. Ssbp2, hoxb7 and pax2 (Dharmacon) were linearized with SalI. Osr2 (gift from José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta) was linearized with EcoRI. Wt1 was linearized with PsiI. All linearized constructs were transcribed with T7 for antisense probe synthesis. For whole-mount immunostaining with 12/101 (DSHB Cat# 12/101, RRID:AB_531892), 3G8 (EXRC Cat# 3G8.2C11, RRID:AB_10013600) and 4A6 (EXRC Cat# 4A6.2C10) we followed the protocol previously described¹⁶. Goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, EXRC: AB_2534069) was used as secondary antibody for 12/101. For preparation of histological slides, we followed the protocol previously described⁷⁰. Xenbase (http:// www. xenbase. org/, RRID:SCR_003280) was used as a source of information on gene expression, sequences, developmental stages, and anatomy.

Image analysis

Images of fixed whole embryos were collected with a Leica DFC420 camera attached to a Leica L2 stereoscope. Histological slides were imaged using a digital camera (Infinity 1; Lumera Corporation) attached to a light-field microscope (CX31: Olympus). GFP fluorescence was visualized under a Discovery V8 (Zeiss) stereomicroscope and imaged with a MicroPublisher 3.3 RTV camera (Q Imaging). Pronephros morphometries were quantified from fixed embryos using ImageJ software (https:// fiji. sc/). Pronephric index (PNI)⁵⁴ and the tubular area size⁷¹ were calculated as previously described.

Statistical analysis

Numbers of embryos (n) and independent experimental replicates (N) for animal studies are stated in graphs. Statistical analysis for Figs. 2, 5, S3 and S4 were performed using Chi-square tests (**p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). Statistical analysis for Figs. 3, 4 and S5k was performed using Kruskal–Wallis tests and means between groups were compared using Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests (****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.1). For all statistical analyses we used Prism6, GraphPad Software, Inc.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article.

References

Zhou, X. & Vize, P. D. Proximo-distal specialization of epithelial transport processes within the Xenopus pronephric kidney tubules. Dev. Biol. 271, 322–338 (2004).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Corkins, M. E. et al. A comparative study of cellular diversity between the Xenopus pronephric and mouse metanephric nephron. Kidney Int. 103, 77–86 (2023).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Torrey, T. W. Morphogenesis of the vertebrate kidney. Organogenesis 559–579 (1965).
Bouchard, M., Souabni, A., Mandler, M., Neubüser, A. & Busslinger, M. Nephric lineage specification by Pax2 and Pax8. Genes Dev. 16, 2958–2970 (2002).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dressler, G. R. The cellular basis of kidney development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104340 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wingert, R. A. & Davidson, A. J. The zebrafish pronephros: A model to study nephron segmentation. Kidney Int. 73, 1120–1127 (2008).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hensey, C., Dolan, V. & Brady, H. R. The Xenopus pronephros as a model system for the study of kidney development and pathophysiology. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc. Eur. Ren. Assoc. 17(09), 73–74 (2002).
CAS Google Scholar
Brändli, A. W. Towards a molecular anatomy of the Xenopus pronephric kidney. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 43, 381–395 (1999).
PubMed Google Scholar
Jones, E. A. Xenopus: A prince among models for pronephric kidney development. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 16, 313–321 (2005).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Blackburn, A. T. M. & Miller, R. K. Modeling congenital kidney diseases in Xenopus laevis. Dis. Model. Mech. 12, (2019).
Desgrange, A. & Cereghini, S. Nephron patterning: Lessons from Xenopus, Zebrafish, and Mouse Studies. Cells 4, 483–499 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lienkamp, S. S. Using Xenopus to study genetic kidney diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 51, 117–124 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barnes, J. D., Crosby, J. L., Jones, C. M., Wright, C. V. & Hogan, B. L. Embryonic expression of Lim-1, the mouse homolog of Xenopus Xlim-1, suggests a role in lateral mesoderm differentiation and neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 161, 168–178 (1994).
PubMed Google Scholar
Chan, T. C., Takahashi, S. & Asashima, M. A role for Xlim-1 in pronephros development in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 228, 256–269 (2000).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carroll, T. J. & Vize, P. D. Synergism between Pax-8 and lim-1 in embryonic kidney development. Dev. Biol. 214, 46–59 (1999).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cirio, M. C. et al. Lhx1 is required for specification of the renal progenitor cell field. PLoS One 6, e18858–e18858 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Espiritu, E. B. et al. The Lhx1-Ldb1 complex interacts with Furry to regulate microRNA expression during pronephric kidney development. Sci. Rep. 8, 16029–16029 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Hukriede, N. A. et al. Conserved requirement of Lim1 function for cell movements during gastrulation. Dev. Cell 4, 83–94 (2003).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kodjabachian, L. et al. A study of Xlim1 function in the Spemann-Mangold organizer. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45, 209–218 (2001).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shawlot, W. & Behringer, R. R. Requirement for Lim1 in head-organizer function. Nature 374, 425–430 (1995).
CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Ssdp proteins interact with the LIM-domain-binding protein Ldb1 to regulate development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 14320–14325 (2002).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
van Meyel, D. J., Thomas, J. B. & Agulnick, A. D. Ssdp proteins bind to LIM-interacting co-factors and regulate the activity of LIM-homeodomain protein complexes in vivo. Dev. Camb. Engl. 130, 1915–1925 (2003).
Google Scholar
Bayarsaihan, D., Soto, R. J. & Lukens, L. N. Cloning and characterization of a novel sequence-specific single-stranded-DNA-binding protein. Biochem. J. 331(Pt 2), 447–452 (1998).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, H., Wang, Z., Tang, Q., Yan, X.-X. & Xu, W. Crystal structure of the LUFS domain of human single-stranded DNA binding Protein 2 (SSBP2). Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc. 28, 788–793 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Crystal structure of human LDB1 in complex with SSBP2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 1042–1048 (2020).
CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Xu, Z. et al. Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins regulate the abundance of LIM domain and LIM domain-binding proteins. Genes Dev. 21, 942–955 (2007).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. SSBP2 is an in vivo tumor suppressor and regulator of LDB1 stability. Oncogene 29, 3044–3053 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baine, M. J. et al. Transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in pancreatic cancer patients identifies novel genes with potential diagnostic utility. PloS One 6, e17014–e17014 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Liu, J.-W. et al. ssDNA-binding protein 2 is frequently hypermethylated and suppresses cell growth in human prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 14, 3754–3760 (2008).
CAS Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. et al. SSBP2 variants are associated with survival in glioblastoma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 18, 3154–3162 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
Kim, H. et al. Single-stranded DNA binding protein 2 expression is associated with patient survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 18, 1244–1244 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moriya, N., Uchiyama, H. & Asashima, M. Induction of pronephric tubules by activin and retinoic acid in presumptive ectoderm of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Growth Differ. 35, 123–128 (1993).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Drews, C., Senkel, S. & Ryffel, G. U. The nephrogenic potential of the transcription factors osr1, osr2, hnf1b, lhx1 and pax8 assessed in Xenopus animal caps. BMC Dev. Biol. 11, 5–5 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Uochi, T. & Asashima, M. Sequential gene expression during pronephric tubule formation in vitro in Xenopus ectoderm. Dev. Growth Differ. 38, 625–634 (1996).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bowes, J. B. et al. Xenbase: Gene expression and improved integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D607–D612 (2010).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Costello, I. et al. Lhx1 functions together with Otx2, Foxa2, and Ldb1 to govern anterior mesendoderm, node, and midline development. Genes Dev. 29, 2108–2122 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nishioka, N. et al. Ssdp1 regulates head morphogenesis of mouse embryos by activating the Lim1-Ldb1 complex. Development 132, 2535–2546 (2005).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Enkhmandakh, B., Makeyev, A. V. & Bayarsaihan, D. The role of the proline-rich domain of Ssdp1 in the modular architecture of the vertebrate head organizer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 11631–11636 (2006).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, M. et al. Functional ablation of the mouse Ldb1 gene results in severe patterning defects during gastrulation. Development 130, 495–505 (2003).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, S., Johnson, K. E. & Wang, H. Z. Blastomeres show differential fate changes in 8-cell Xenopus laevis embryos that are rotated 90 degrees before first cleavage. Dev. Growth Differ. 40, 189–198 (1998).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tran, U., Pickney, L. M., Ozpolat, B. D. & Wessely, O. Xenopus Bicaudal-C is required for the differentiation of the amphibian pronephros. Dev. Biol. 307, 152–164 (2007).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Howland, R. B. On the effect of removal of the pronephros of the amphibian embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2, 231–234 (1916).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Moody, S. A. Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell-stage Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol. 122, 300–319 (1987).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Buisson, I., Le Bouffant, R., Futel, M., Riou, J.-F. & Umbhauer, M. Pax8 and Pax2 are specifically required at different steps of Xenopus pronephros development. Dev. Biol. 397, 175–190 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carroll, T. J., Wallingford, J. B. & Vize, P. D. Dynamic patterns of gene expression in the developing pronephros of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Genet. 24, 199–207 (1999).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tena, J. J. et al. Odd-skipped genes encode repressors that control kidney development. Dev. Biol. 301, 518–531 (2007).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brennan, H. C., Nijjar, S. & Jones, E. A. The specification and growth factor inducibility of the pronephric glomus in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Camb. Engl. 126, 5847–5856 (1999).
CAS Google Scholar
Mauch, T. J., Yang, G., Wright, M., Smith, D. & Schoenwolf, G. C. Signals from trunk paraxial mesoderm induce pronephros formation in chick intermediate mesoderm. Dev. Biol. 220, 62–75 (2000).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
James, R. G. & Schultheiss, T. M. Patterning of the avian intermediate mesoderm by lateral plate and axial tissues. Dev. Biol. 253, 109–124 (2003).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guillaume, R., Bressan, M. & Herzlinger, D. Paraxial mesoderm contributes stromal cells to the developing kidney. Dev. Biol. 329, 169–175 (2009).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cartry, J. et al. Retinoic acid signalling is required for specification of pronephric cell fate. Dev. Biol. 299, 35–51 (2006).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vize, P. D., Jones, E. A. & Pfister, R. Development of the Xenopus pronephric system. Dev. Biol. 171, 531–540 (1995).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Smith, J. C. & Watt, F. M. Biochemical specificity of Xenopus notochord. Differentiation 29, 109–115 (1985).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wallingford, J. B., Carroll, T. J. & Vize, P. D. Precocious expression of the Wilms’ tumor gene xWT1 inhibits embryonic kidney development in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 202, 103–112 (1998).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yasuoka, Y. & Taira, M. LIM homeodomain proteins and associated partners: Then and now. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 145, 113–166 (2021).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chan, T. C., Ariizumi, T. & Asashima, M. A model system for organ engineering: Transplantation of in vitro induced embryonic kidney. Naturwissenschaften 86, 224–227 (1999).
CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Osafune, K., Nishinakamura, R., Komazaki, S. & Asashima, M. In vitro induction of the pronephric duct in Xenopus explants. Dev. Growth Differ. 44, 161–167 (2002).
PubMed Google Scholar
Hiratani, I., Yamamoto, N., Mochizuki, T., Ohmori, S. & Taira, M. Selective degradation of excess Ldb1 by Rnf12/RLIM confers proper Ldb1 expression levels and Xlim-1/Ldb1 stoichiometry in Xenopus organizer functions. Dev. Camb. Engl. 130, 4161–4175 (2003).
CAS Google Scholar
Lee, B., Lee, S., Agulnick, A. D., Lee, J. W. & Lee, S.-K. Single-stranded DNA binding proteins are required for LIM complexes to induce transcriptionally active chromatin and specify spinal neuronal identities. Dev. Camb. Engl. 143, 1721–1731 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Taira, M., Otani, H., Jamrich, M. & Dawid, I. B. Expression of the LIM class homeobox gene Xlim-1 in pronephros and CNS cell lineages of Xenopus embryos is affected by retinoic acid and exogastrulation. Development 120, 1525–1536 (1994).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lindenmeyer, M. T. et al. Systematic analysis of a novel human renal glomerulus-enriched gene expression dataset. PloS One 5, e11545–e11545 (2010).
PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Haldin, C. E. et al. The lmx1b gene is pivotal in glomus development in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 322, 74–85 (2008).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yasuoka, Y. et al. Occupancy of tissue-specific cis-regulatory modules by Otx2 and TLE/Groucho for embryonic head specification. Nat. Commun. 5, 4322–4322 (2014).
CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Bronstein, R. et al. Transcriptional regulation by CHIP/LDB complexes. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001063 (2010).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakano, T., Murata, T., Matsuo, I. & Aizawa, S. OTX2 directly interacts with LIM1 and HNF-3beta. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 267, 64–70 (2000).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nieuwkoop, P. D. & Faber, J. Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Garland Publishing, 1994).
Gawantka, V. et al. Gene expression screening in Xenopus identifies molecular pathways, predicts gene function and provides a global view of embryonic patterning. Mech. Dev. 77, 95–141 (1998).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miller, R. K. et al. Pronephric tubulogenesis requires Daam1-mediated planar cell polarity signaling. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 22, 1654–1664 (2011).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Taira, M., Jamrich, M., Good, P. J. & Dawid, I. B. The LIM domain-containing homeo box gene Xlim-1 is expressed specifically in the organizer region of Xenopus gastrula embryos. Genes Dev. 6, 356–366 (1992).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cervino, A. S. et al. Furry is required for cell movements during gastrulation and functionally interacts with NDR1. Sci. Rep. 11, 6607–6607 (2021).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Cizelsky, W., Tata, A., Kühl, M. & Kühl, S. J. The Wnt/JNK signaling target gene alcam is required for embryonic kidney development. Dev. Camb. Engl. 141, 2064–2074 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Oliver Wessely, Rachel Miller and José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta for kindly provide plasmid constructs; Eugenio Sewchuk for Xenopus laevis care; Lance Davidson for anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 antibody and RNA synthesis reagents. The laboratory of M. Cecilia Cirio received support for this work from the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica of Argentina (PICT-2013 0381). M.C.C. laboratory has support from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 2021-2023 GI 11220200101818CO). The laboratory of Neil Hukriede received support for this work from the NIH 2R01 DK069403. A.S.C. and I.A.L. were supported by the CONICET Doctoral Fellowship Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE-CONICET), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria Pabellón II, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Ailen S. Cervino, Mariano G. Collodel, Ivan A. Lopez, Carolina Roa & M. Cecilia Cirio
Centro de Estudios Biomédicos, Básicos, Aplicados y Desarrollo (CEBBAD), Universidad Maimónides, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Daniel Hochbaum
Department of Developmental Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Neil A. Hukriede

Authors

Ailen S. Cervino
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mariano G. Collodel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ivan A. Lopez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carolina Roa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Daniel Hochbaum
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Neil A. Hukriede
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
M. Cecilia Cirio
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.S.C., M.G.C., I.A.L., D.H., N.A.H. and M.C.C., conceived, designed, contributed, and analyzed data. A.S.C., M.G.C., I.A.L., C.R. and M.C.C. performed the Xenopus experiments. D.H. designed and performed the experiments for generating pCS2 + .ssbp2.GFP and pCS2 + .ssbp2*Δ constructs. The manuscript was written by M.C.C. and A.S.C with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Cecilia Cirio.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Legends.

Supplementary Figure 2.

Supplementary Figure 3.

Supplementary Figure 4.

Supplementary Figure 5.

Supplementary Figure 6.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cervino, A.S., Collodel, M.G., Lopez, I.A. et al. Xenopus Ssbp2 is required for embryonic pronephros morphogenesis and terminal differentiation. Sci Rep 13, 16671 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43662-1

Download citation

Received: 08 May 2023
Accepted: 27 September 2023
Published: 04 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43662-1

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.