Abstract
In this study, a new and efficient Rod-like bifunctional Fe-based MOF@CuO nanocomposites (RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC) were synthesized as new and efficient heterogeneous catalyst through a simple method from easily available 1,3,5-benzenetricarbocylic acid linker, nitrate ferric as a source of iron and copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles under microwave irradiation. The synthesized nanocatalysts were characterized with different techniques such as Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), mapping, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC had relatively high specific surface area (203 m2 g−1) while exhibiting superparamagnetic properties. The catalytic activity of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC was explored in a facile and green methodology to prepare diverse N‑amino-2-pyridones by one-pot four component reactions comprising aromatic aldehyde, malononitrile, methyl cyanoacetate and hydrazine hydrate within mild and solvent-free conditions. This protocol enjoys features like providing the final products during low reaction times in excellent yields under solvent-free conditions. The use of easily available and inexpensive reactants for the synthesis of the catalyst, environmental compatibility, low catalyst loading, fast and clean work-up and reusability of catalyst for several cycles with consistent activity are counted as the outstanding features of this procedure.
Introduction
Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are becoming important tools for the efficient and rapid synthesis of new diverse complex products in chemistry, especially in pharmaceuticals and drug discovery with attractive biological properties1,2,3,4. The advantages of MCRs over conventional linear syntheses that cause MCRs being systems of extremely eco-friendly and ideal including, solvents, reagents, time and energy saving, quick and simple implementation, bond-forming efficiency, no production of by-products, minimize waste, lower costs, high degree of atom economy since most of the atoms of substrates will present in the target product, avoidance of complex purification procedure, high total yield and high selectivity1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. The combination the merits of MCRs with the advantages of solvent-free conditions and easily recovered heterogeneous catalyst can meet the requirements of green chemistry4.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) refer to porous hybrid materials11 with adjustable pore size12, high surface area12, thermal stability and good chemical13. They can be modified through several post-synthesis treatments or on-site methods to improve their performance12,14. They have gained widespread interest in various applications such as sensors15, storage or gas separation15, removal of pesticides16 and organic pollutants17, electronic and optical devices18, drug delivery15 and biomedical purposes19. MOFs and their nanocomposites have advanced catalytic features20.
The high surface-to-volume ratio of these structures results in promoted the activity of nanoparticles, shorter reaction time, enhanced selectivity, and convenient recovery from reaction mixtures using uncomplicated filtration techniques21,22.
In turn, MOFs have catalytic features but the introduction of metal oxides enhances the catalytic efficiency of MOF to the next level23. In addition, metal oxides have very active sites and high electronic conductivity but the low surface area restricts the direct use of metal oxides as catalyst. On the other side, MOFs usually have high surface area but poor electronic conductivity and low active site. Thus, the composite materials uniting the MOFs with metal oxides can provide the increased surface area as well as active metal sites. Thus, the synergetic action of both the MOF and metal oxides overcomes the shortcoming of individual frameworks and makes the bridge between these materials24.
Copper oxide (CuO) is an intermediate metal oxide with a narrow band gap (1.2–1.4 eV). It is a promising p-type material whose physicochemical properties strongly depend on its size and morphology11,12. Various morphologies of CuO nanostructures such as nanosheets, hollow-spherical, nano-needles, nanofibers, nanowires, nanofilaments have been utilized in multidimensional applications including catalysis, sensors, magnetic storage media, Li batteries, field emission, solar energy transformation, electronics and semiconductors25,26.
Recently, the synthesis of one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures has attracted considerable attention because 1D nanostructures have potential applications in wide-ranging sectors including catalysis, sensing, electronics and photoelectronics, with performances that are anticipated to be superior to those of their bulk counterparts27,28. Besides, the different numbers of active sites and crystal plane effects explained why the nanorods showed higher activity than the corresponding nanoparticles29,30.
The presence of versatile synthons of N-Amino-2-pyridone in complex biological scaffolds has resulted in a vast range of biological and pharmaceutical properties.
Among a large diversity of heterocyclic compounds, the synthetic development of 2-pyridone derivatives has currently changed into an interesting challenge and an ongoing field of concern owing to the presence this valuable synthons in natural compound, which can lead to the synthesis of various nitrogen-containing heterocyclic structures, including β-lactam, quinolizidine, pyridine, piperidine, as well as indolizidine alkaloid31 with a wide spectrum of significant biological and pharmacological properties and physiological activities such as antibacterial32, antifungal33, antitumor34,35, cardiotonic36, psychotherapeutic37, and possible HIC-1 specific transcriptase inhibition38.
Ful synthetic intermediates of 1,6-diamino-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2-dihydro pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile are an N‑amino-2-pyridone subset, representing a combination of valuable synthons of 2-oxo-3-cyanopyridines and 3,5-dicyanopyridines with divers and significant biodynamic, biological and pharmaceutical properties which led to this type of pyridine derivatives with high reactivity and vast medicinal utility with a wide spectrum of synthetic N-heterocycles, including 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyridines39, pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1′,5′-a]pyridines40, pyrido[1,2-b][1,2,4]triazines39,41, as well as pyrido[1,2-b][1,2,4]triazepines39.
Considering the significance of 2-pyridone skeleton, modern organic chemical sciences seek to develop effective, novel, and eco-friendly synthesis protocols for preparing 1, 6-diamino-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile derivatives.
A few catalysts were previously employed to synthesize N‑amino-2-pyridones such as bismuth (III) nitrate pentahydrate as an efficiently practical Lewis acid catalytic agent42, piperidine43, magnesium oxide as an extremely powerful heterogeneous base catalytic agent42, polyaniline44, K2CO345 and poly(4-vinylpyridine)44. The above methods took the advantage of 2-cyanoacetohydrazide as the starting material to synthesize N-amino-2-pyridones. The current study thus sought to synthesize derivatives of 1,6-diamino-2-oxo- 4-phenyl-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile by the four-component one-pot coupling of aromatic aldehydes, malononitrile, methyl cyanoacetate and hydrazine hydrate using a solvent-free and reflux conditions in the presence of RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
Experimental section
Materials and apparatus
High-purity chemical substances were bought from Sigma Aldrich and used with no additional purification. Physical constants of the products were compared with the authentic samples and FT-IR spectroscopy for threir characterization. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) on Silica G60 F254 (Merck) TLC plates was used to monitor the reaction progress and determine the substrate purity. An Electrotermal 9100 device in open capillary tubes was employed to measure melting points, the values of which were left uncorrected. FTIR spectra were recorded for KBr pellets of the samples using a JASCO FT-IR-4000 spectrophotometer. NMR spectroscopy (1H NMR) was obtained using a Bruker Avance 400 MHz NMR spectrometer in d6-DMSO at ambient temperature. The crystallinity, phase structure, and crystallite size of RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC were determined by a PC-APD X-ray diffractometer and Kα radiation (α2, λ2 = 1.54439 Å) and graphite mono-chromatic Cu radiation (α1, λ1 = 1.54056 Å) (Philips, the Netherlands). The X’Pert HighScore Plus software was used for data analysis. The XRD pattern was obtained in the range 2°–80° 2θ, with a step size of 0.016°. Then, SEM and EDS (KYKY & EM 3200) were applied to investigate RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC. Thermal behavior analysis was carried out in N2 atmosphere in the temperature range of room temperature to 350 °C using a STA-1500 thermoanalyzer. A Lakeshore (model 7407) was employed to evaluate magnetization within magnetic fields under room temperature.
Synthesis of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC nano-catalyst
Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles
First, 0.1 M copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O) was dissolved in deionized water. Then, saturated NaOH solution was added until the pH of the solution reached 8.0; where the resulting precipitates were collected. Raw materials were removed from the obtained product by three times washing with ethanol, followed by drying at 80 °C for 12 h. The resulting precipitates were calcinated under 400 °C within a 1-h period.
Synthesis of Fe-based metal organic frameworks (Fe-based MOF)
First, 0.1 M copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O) was dissolved in deionized water. Then, saturated NaOH solution was added until the pH of the solution reached 8.0; where the resulting precipitates were collected. Raw materials were removed from the obtained product by three times washing with ethanol, followed by drying at 80 °C for 12 h. The resulting precipitates were calcinated under 400 °C within a 1-h period.
Synthesis of bi-functional Fe-based metal organic frameworks (BF Fe-based MOF)
0.092 mmol (0.026 g) of surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was dispersed in N-hexane (solution A). Fe-MOF (0.461 mmol, 0.283 g), Fe2O3 (0.154 mmol, 0.36 g), and bentonite (0.154 mmol, 0.0344 g) were dissolved in ion-free water (solution B). Then, solution B was added to A. The obtained mixture was heated to 80 °C for 2 h. The developed MOF sediments were collected after overnight refrigeration. Raw materials were removed from the obtained product by three times washing with boiling water. Finally, the MOF precipitates were calcined for one hour in an oven at 150 °C.
Synthesis of rod-like BF Fe-based MOF@CuO nanocomposite
Deionized water was used to disperse 3 mmol of dried TF Fe-based MOF at 80 °C in a beaker. Next, 1 mmol of CuO nanoparticles were added and the mixture was stirred for 10 min to achieve a homogeneous solution. The final powder mixture was delivered to a glassy vial, which was promptly transferred into the microwave oven (300 W) and microwaved for 60 min. Acetic acid was used to wash the obtained products, to remove the raw materials. The dried powder was finally calcined at 190 °C for 70 min46,47,48,49,50,51,52.
The general procedure to synthesize N‑amino-2-pyridones (5a–l)
A combination of hydrazine hydrate (3 mmol, 0.15 mL), methyl cyanoacetate (3 mmol, 0.27 mL), malononitrile (3 mmol, 0.198 g), aromatic aldehydes (3 mmol), and RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC (10 w%) was heated under solvent-free and reflux conditions and stirred for a determined period, as shown in Table 2. TLC was employed to monitor the reaction. Acetone was used to dissolve the resulting mixture after it was cooled. Stirring the mixture for two minutes was followed by filtering the suspended solution and recovering the heterogeneous catalyst. The pure product obtained after acetone evaporation and washing solid precipitates with water. Melting points, FTIR, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were considered to examine the structural characteristics of the products.
Selected spectral data
1,6-diamino-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5a): m.p: 220–222 °C (lit.47 222–224 °C); Yield: 98%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.62 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 5.51 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.66–7.24 (m, 3H, CHAr), 8.85 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 55.1, 55.5, 66.1, 105.0, 118.9, 119.4, 130.7, 132.0, 159.3, 161.4, 162.2, 164.9, 174.6. ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5b): m.p: 340–343 °C (lit.47 341–342 °C); Yield: 87%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 5.71 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.60 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CHAro), 7.92 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CHAro), 8.74 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ = 68.7, 80.6, 115.2, 116.4, 128.3, 129.1, 130.0, 132.6, 136.0, 153.8, 158.2, 160.7 ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5c): m.p: > 340 °C (lit.47 > 340 °C); Yield: 91%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 5.79 (brs, 2H, NH2), 7.63–8.44 (m, 4H, CHAro), 8.75 (brs, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 53.6, 106.4, 114.9, 124.4, 131.7, 137.2, 149.2, 152.8, 153.3, 161.7 ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(2-fluorophenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5d): mp: 247–249 °C (lit.48 247–249 °C); Yield: 89%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 5.62 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.34–7.67 (m, 4H, CHAro), 8.63 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ = 87.7, 116.2, 116.4, 122.2, 124.6, 130.1, 133.1, 133.2, 158.0, 160.5, 163.1, 164.1 ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(2-nitrophenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5e): m.p: 234–235 °C (lit.48 234–236); Yield: 90%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 5.54 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.55–7.89 (m, 4H, CHAro), 8.21 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 87.2, 98.0, 113.7, 114.3, 119.0, 125.0, 126.4, 129.4, 132.1, 134.3, 149.3, 155.3, 158.7 ppm.
1,6-diamino-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5f): m.p = 238–240 °C (lit.47 237–240); Yield: 87%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 5.69 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.51–7.63 (m, 5H, CHAro), 8.51 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 74.3, 86.4, 115.4, 116.3, 128.0, 128.6, 130.2, 134.6, 156.6, 159.2, 159.5.
1,6-diamino-4-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5g): m.p = 248–250 °C (lit.47 249–251); Yield: 99%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm) δ: 3.07 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 5.67 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm, 6.86 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, CHAro), 7.41 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, CHAro), 8.38 (brs, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ = 73.6, 85.5, 111.1, 111.7, 116.2, 120.6, 128.9, 129.5, 151.5, 156.7, 159.5, 159.6 ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5h): m.p: 324–326 °C (lit.47 325–327 °C); Yield: 99%,; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 5.64 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.90 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, CHAro), 6.95 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, CHAro), 7.34 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, CHAro), 8.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, CHAro), 8.40 (brs, 1H, NH2), 10.05 (s, 1H, OH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 74.1, 115.2, 116.4, 122.5, 124.8, 129.9, 134.0, 154.8, 156.6, 159.3, 162.9 ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5i): m.p: 250–251 °C (lit.49 249–251 °C); Yield 98%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 5.68 (s, 2H, N-NH2), 6.42 (brs, 2H, H-Ar), 6.66 (brs, 2H, H-Ar), 8.83 (brs, 2H, NH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 76.2, 91.4, 116.7, 125.8, 130.6, 134.4, 135.2, 148.1, 160.3, 160.5, 160.6 ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5j): m.p: 252–253 °C (lit.42 251–253); Yield: 99%, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.62 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 5.51 (S, 2H, NH2), 6.66–7.24 (m, 3H, CHAro), 8.85 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 55.1, 55.5, 66.1, 105.0, 118.9, 119.4, 130.7, 132.0, 159.3, 161.4, 162.2, 164.9, 174.6 ppm.
1,6-diamino-2-oxo-4-(p-tolyl)-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5k): m.p: 238–240 °C (lit.47 240–241 °C); Yield: 97%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 5.66 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.35–7.40 (m, 4H, CHAro), 8.45 (brs, 2H, NH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 20.9, 74.2, 86.3, 115.5, 116.4, 127.9, 129.1, 131.6, 140.0, 156.6, 159.3, 159.6 ppm.
1,6-diamino-4-(furan-2-yl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (5l): m.p: 323–326 °C (lit.47 325–327 °C); Yield: 98%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6,) δ: 5.79 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.49–7.62 (m, 3H, CHAro), 8.17 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ = 80.0, 114.4, 137.4, 139.2, 143.5, 146.5, 148.2, 150.2, 155.9, 164.1, 171.6 ppm.
1',6'-diamino-2'-oxo-1',2'-dihydro-[2,4'-bipyridine]-3',5'-dicarbonitrile (5m): m.p: 296–297 °C; Yield: 90%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 5.79 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.64–7.88 (m, 4H, CHAro), 8.81 (s, 2H, NH2) ppm; 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): δ 85.2, 113.9, 121.8, 123.7, 129.6, 134.7, 140.9, 156.5, 161.6, 183.7, 187.7, 188.2 ppm.
Results and discussion
After preparing metal–organic framework nanostructures (Fe-MOF) via co-precipitation method using Fe (NO3)3∙9H2O as iron precursor and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid as organic ligand CuO nanostructures were added to modify the surface of metal–organic nano-framework. The mentioned nanostructures were placed on the metal–organic nano-framework by co-precipitation method to achieve Rod-like trifunctional Fe-based MOF@CuO nanocomposites (RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC) as nano-catalyst.
Characterization of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC
Different procedures, including XRD, FE-SEM, EDX, TGA, BET, and VSM, were used to characterize RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
The XRD pattern of the RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC is shown in Fig. 1. Accordingly, the CuO diffraction peaks are covered by TF Fe-based MOF diffraction peaks. Debye–Scherrer formula (Eq. 1) was employed to estimate the crystallite size of the obtained RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
In which, λ, θ, and β represent the X-ray wavelength (1.54056 Å for Cu lamp), half of the Bragg diffraction angle, and half of the width of maximum intensity diffraction peak, respectively. RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC had a mean crystallite size of 83.4 nm.
XRD pattern of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
Figure 2a indicates a low-magnification FE-SEM image of the produced RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC. The TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC showed a rod-like structure. Based on Fig. 2b, the rods have a length and diameter of nearly 1–3 μm and 10–30 nm, respectively. Uniform coverage of the study area by the nanorods was evident. Morphologically, the RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC showed a straight rod characteristic, as well as a smooth surface (Fig. 2b).
(a) SEM image and (b) high-resolution SEM image of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
Figure 3 shows a TEM image of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC. It can be observed that the diameter of Fe-based MOF nanorods is about 30 nm. The surface of Fe-based MOF nanorods is homogeneously covered with well-dispersed spherical CuO nanoparticles. The particle size of the CuO nanoparticles is different. It can be found that the diameter of CuO nanoparticles is mostly distributed between 2 and 7 nm.
TEM image of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
Figure 4 shows EDX results of RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC. The RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC, contain C, O, Cu, and Fe with the atomic ratio of C: O: Cu: Fe ≈ 33.14: 12.55: 3.76: 50.55, with no other impurity peaks.
EDX spectra of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
Figure 5 indicates the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of the RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC. Physical characteristics, such as the surface area, pore size, and volume, and distribution, were determined through N2 sorption estimations. Type IV isotherm can be recognized in the case of RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC with a distinct hysteresis loop. The surface area, the pore volume, and pore size of RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC were 8.4228 m2 g−1, 0.031269 cm3 g−1, and 17.346 nm, respectively.
(a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC and (b) BJH results obtained for RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
The VSM analysis was utilized at room temperature to characterize the magnetic properties of the RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC. Figure 6 presents the M–H curve of the nanocomposite at room temperature. Accordingly, the semiconductor materials show magnetic characteristics with strong dependence on structural, morphological, and crystal geometric factors. Typical M–H curves represent a weak paramagnetic due to limited spin orientation at the maximum applied field (0.012 Oe). Nanocomposite has a coercivity of Hc, 75.0 Oe, suggesting their magnetic behavior with saturation magnetism of Ms, 0.17 emu. g−1.
VSM magnetization curves of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
The FT-IR spectra of CuO, TF Fe-based MOF, and RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC are shown in Fig. 7. FTIR spectroscopy can be employed for identifying molecule functional groups as each chemical bond has a distinct energy absorption band, through which the structural and bond information of compounds can be obtained. The FTIR spectrum related to the recently obtained cupric oxide sample is shown in Fig. 7a. The peaks observed at 453, 494, 609 cm−1 represent the Cu–O bond characteristic stretching vibration of CuO, which agrees with literature values. The Sharp peak at 609 cm-1 for CuO nanoparticles and the wide peak at 3433 cm−1 represent Cu–O bond formation and O–H stretching of the moisture content, respectively53.
IR (KBr, υ cm−1) curve of (a) CuO, (b) 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid linker, (c) synthesized Fe-based MOF and (d) RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
Water attachment to the surface of CuO nanoparticles can justify this phenomenon, while it is possible to remove this reaction byproduct through additional heating. The O–H bond symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations are manifested by the respective bands at 2933 and 3433 cm−1.
The IR spectrum of 6c shows that the addition of iron nitrate to the linker and formation Fe-MOF led to a rise in the absorption of carbonyl group due to the coordination of Fe metal with acidic OH. Also, according to the IR spectrum of 6d addition of of Fe-MOF to the CuO nanoparticles and the formation of Fe-MOF@CuO decreased the absorption of carbonyl due to the coordination of the CuO nanoparticle with the oxygen of the carbonyl group.
Thermal analysis of a representative sample of the synthesized compound, RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC, is shown in Table 1. The weight losses started at 50 °C and ended at 500 °C, approximately. The 1st and 2st temperatures are 67 °C and 92 °C, where minor weight losses result from the vanished solvent and evaporated trapping solvent, respectively. Proportionate to temperature ascent from 273 to 315 °C was observed. That probably corresponds to decomposing linker on the skeleton. The weight loss of dissociation of coordinated water for nanocomposite was estimated in the range of 420–462 °C. Therefore, obtained data show high thermal stability in elevated temperatures.
Synhtesis of N‑amino-2-pyridones in the presence of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC as catalyst
After successful preparation and characterization of nano organo-catalyst by SEM, EDS, mapping, XRD, BET, TGA and VSM, it was applied in prominent organic reactions to prepare N-amino-2-pyridones through one-pot four-component reaction among methyl cyanoacetate, Hydrazine hydrate, malononitrile and aromatic aldehydes to examine the catalytic function of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC as effective Lewis acid catalyst (Fig. 8).
Four-component synthesis of N‑amino-2-pyridones catalyzed by RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC under solvent-free and reflux conditions.
The effects of various parameters were initially studied by testing a model reaction of methyl cyanoacetate (1 mmol), Hydrazine hydrate (1 mmol), malononitrile (1 mmol) and 4-methoxybenzaldehyde (1 mmol) to achieve optimal reaction conditions. Investigations were primarily performed to determine the contribution of the solvent to the reactions through the model reaction. Hence, this step was carried out using different solvents, including water, ethanol, methanol, acetonitrile and n-hexane solvents. Besides, solvent-free conditions were also examined in the presence of 10 w% of catalytic of RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC at reflux conditions. According to the results, the solvent-free condition was the most appropriate to prepare Namino-2-pyridones, and the reaction time gradually decreased by using highly polar to less polar solvents (Table 2).
In the next step, the effect of reaction temperature was tested considering room temperature, 50 and reflux conditions. Temperature decline below 50 ºC decremented the yield of the product and increased the reaction time. Moreover, increasing temperature from 50 °C to reflux conditions was improved the progress of the reaction (Table 2, entries 6–8).
The catalyst amount was optimized through the model reaction in solvent-free conditions in the absence and presence of various catalyst amounts. The yield was 76%, 98%, 98%, and 98% when using 5, 10, 15, 20 w% of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC, respectively (Table 2). The results indicate the RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC catalyst contributes significantly to achieving the response so that reaction produced trace product in the absence of catalyst after prolonged reaction time while 10 w% catalyst seemed to be enough for the reaction to proceed, leading to considerably high yields while requiring shorter reaction times. Hence, a decrease in the catalyst amount resulted in the efficiency reduction, while higher catalyst amounts led to no significant efficiency improvements (Table 2, entry 6 and entries 9–12).
Under optimal reaction conditions, the scope, generality, and applicability of newly introduced protocol were checked by various aromatic aldehydes, with substituents that withdraw or donate electrons (Table 3), malononitrile, methylcyanoacetate and hydrazine hydrate were used to perform the reaction in the presence of 10 w% RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC under solvent-free and reflux conditions. As Table 3 indicates, aldehydes with electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups offer corresponding N-amino-2-pyridones with considerably high product yield (87–99%) while requiring shorter reaction times (2–5 min) with no side reactions.
To examine the advantages of this methodology, new synthesized catalyst was compared with recently introduced catalysts to synthesize N-amino-2-pyridones (Table 4). According to the results, the proposed protocol was highly efficient due to the solvent-free conditions and excellent catalytic effects within short reaction time.
The catalyst reusability was examined through the reaction among 4-methoxybenzaldehyde (3 mmol), methyl cyanoacetate (3 mmol), hydrazine hydrate (3 mmol) and malononitrile (3 mmol), conducted as a model reaction in optimized reaction conditions. Noteworthy, the product yield was constant after recycling (run1, 98%; run 2, 98%; run 3, 98%). It is possible to reuse RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC until three runs with no significant decline in its catalytic function. In the recycling procedure, hot acetone addition aimed at diluting the model reaction mixture following the reaction completion and stirring the mixture over a 5-min period. The catalyst was insoluble in acetone and underwent several washings with acetone for its separation by filtration. The above steps were followed by drying at 40 °C within an 8-h period and reusing the catalyst with no considerable decline in its catalytic effects (Fig. 9).
Reusability of the RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC in the synthesis of 5a.
In order to indicate the stability of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC after recovering and reusing, recovered catalyst was characterized. The morphology and particle size of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC after recycling has been studied by SEM technique. The SEM image of reused RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC is shown in Fig. 10. As shown in this Figure, the size and morphology of catalyst after reusing is shown a good agreement to fresh catalyst, which is about 10–30 nm in diameters. Also, the shape of the recycled catalyst was the same as the fresh catalyst, indicating its good mechanical strength.
SEM images of recovered RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
The XRD of the recovered RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC after the three cycle shows clear peaks corresponding to the composite at 8.43°, 13.92° and 20.57° (Fig. 11). It clearly indicates that the catalyst remains unchanged even after the reaction.
XRD Pattern of recovered RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC.
The proposed mechanisms were used to prepare N-amino-2-pyridones in the presence of RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC as shown in Fig. 12. Firstly, arylidenemalononitrile (A) formation was done from the Knoevenagel condensation aromatic aldehydes and malononitrile when RL BF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC was present. Meantime, methyl cyanoacetate reacts with hydrazine hydrate to form intermediate (B). Then, interaction of the enolizable cyanoacetic acid hydrazide (C) with arylidenemalononitrile (A) through Michael addition, followed by booting of the intermediate’s intramolecular cyclization by nano-catalyst result in the final product yields.
Proposed mechanism for the synthesis of N‑amino-2-pyridones.
Conclusion
In summary, an effective technique was reported for the generation of useful RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC nano-catalyst using 1,3,5-Benzenetricarboxylic acid linker via microwave irradiation. The catalytic activity of RL TF Fe-based MOF@CuO NC was explored in one-pot synthesis of N-amino-2-pyridones by facile, rapid and versatile multi-component reaction of malononitrile, diverse aromatic aldehydes, hydrazine hydrate and ethyl cyanoacetate under mild and solvent-free conditions. The procedure offers several advantages including environmentally friendly, excellent yields with short reaction times, simple work up procedure and the ability of recyclability catalyst for three times with no considerable functional loss.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article (and its Supplementary information files).
References
Chen, M. N., Mo, L. P., Cui, Z. S. & Zhang, Z. H. Magnetic nanocatalysts: Synthesis and application in multicomponent reactions. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 15, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.08.009 (2019).
Zhang, M., Liu, Y. H., Shang, Z. R., Hu, H. C. & Zhang, Z. H. Supported molybdenum on graphene oxide/Fe3O4: An efficient, magnetically separable catalyst for one-pot construction of spiro-oxindole dihydropyridines in deep eutectic solvent under microwave irradiation. Catal. Commun. 88, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.09.028 (2017).
Gao, G., Di, J. Q., Zhang, H. Y., Mo, L. P. & Zhang, Z. H. A magnetic metal organic framework material as a highly efficient and recyclable catalyst for synthesis of cyclohexenone derivatives. J. Catal. 387, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.04.013 (2020).
Zhang, H. Y. et al. A magnetic metal–organic framework as a highly active heterogeneous catalyst for one-pot synthesis of 2-substituted alkyl and aryl (indolyl) kojic acid derivatives. New J. Chem. 41, 7108–7115. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NJ01592E (2017).
Singh, H. K. et al. Visible-light-promoted synthesis of fusesd imidazoheterocycle by Eosin Y under metal-free and solvent-free conditions. ChemistrySelect 6, 13982–13991. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202103548 (2021).
Gajengi, A. L. et al. Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of NiO nanoparticles and their catalytic application for the synthesis of trisubstituted imidazoles under solvent free conditions. Catal. Commun. 161, 106366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2021.106366 (2021).
Kargar, P. G. & Bagherzade, G. Robust, highly active, and stable supported Co (ii) nanoparticles on magnetic cellulose nanofiber-functionalized for the multi-component reactions of piperidines and alcohol oxidation. RSC Adv. 11, 23192–23206. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA00208B (2021).
Patki, A. S., Patil, K. N., Kusuma, S., Muley, D. B. & Jadhav, A. H. One-pot synthesis of multicomponent pyrazole-4-carbonitrile derivatives under solvent-free condition by using engineered polyvinyl alcohol catalyst. Res. Chem. Intermed. 47, 2751–2773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-021-04450-6 (2021).
Dadaei, M. & Naeimi, H. An environment-friendly method for green synthesis of pyranopyrazole derivatives catalyzed by CoCuFe2O4 magnetic nanocrystals under solvent-free conditions. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 42, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2020.1725897 (2021).
Ziarani, G. M., Aleali, F. & Lashgari, N. Recent applications of barbituric acid in multicomponent reactions. RSC Adv. 6, 50895–50922. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA09874F (2016).
Zhang, J. et al. Post-synthesis metal-organic framework for turn-on ratiometric fluorescence sensing of UO22+. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 648, e202100337. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.202100337 (2022).
Azizabadi, O., Akbarzadeh, F., Danshina, S., Chauhan, N. P. S. & Sargazi, G. An efficient ultrasonic assisted reverse micelle synthesis route for Fe3O4@ Cu-MOF/core-shell nanostructures and its antibacterial activities. J. Solid State Chem. 294, 121897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121897 (2021).
Wang, P. et al. Recent advances in metal organic frameworks-based surface enhanced Raman scattering substrates: Synthesis and applications. Molecules 26, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010209 (2021).
Zhang, M. et al. Visual detection for nucleic acid-based techniques as potential on-site detection methods. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1099, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.056 (2020).
Peng, H. et al. Synthesis of robust MOFs@ COFs porous hybrid materials via an Aza-Diels–Alder reaction: Towards high-performance supercapacitor materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19602–19609. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202008408 (2020).
Mondol, M. M. H. & Jhung, S. H. Adsorptive removal of pesticides from water with metal–organic framework-based materials. J. Chem. Eng. 421, 129688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129688 (2021).
Mirhosseini, H., Shamspur, T., Mostafavi, A. & Sargazi, G. A novel ultrasonic reverse micelle-assisted electrospun efficient route for Eu-MOF and Eu-MOF/CA composite nanofibers: A high performance photocatalytic treatment for removal of BG pollutant. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 4317–4328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10746-8 (2021).
Fan, F. R. et al. Electric-magneto-optical Kerr effect in a hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 12883–12886. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b04911 (2017).
Giliopoulos, D., Zamboulis, A., Giannakoudakis, D., Bikiaris, D. & Triantafyllidis, K. Polymer/metal organic framework (MOF) nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Molecules 25, 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010185 (2020).
Goetjen, T. A. et al. Metal–organic framework (MOF) materials as polymerization catalysts: A review and recent advances. Chem. Commun. 56, 10409–10418. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC03790G (2020).
Abdelhamid, H. N., El-Bery, H. M., Metwally, A. A., Elshazly, M. & Hathout, R. M. Synthesis of CdS-modified chitosan quantum dots for the drug delivery of Sesamol. Carbohydr. Polym. 214, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.024 (2019).
Abdel-Magied, A. F., Abdelhamid, H. N., Ashour, R. M., Zou, X. & Forsberg, K. Hierarchical porous zeolitic imidazolate frameworks nanoparticles for efficient adsorption of rare-earth elements. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 278, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.11.022 (2019).
Safaei, M. et al. A review on metal-organic frameworks: Synthesis and applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 118, 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.007 (2019).
Emam, H. E., Abdelhamid, H. N. & Abdelhameed, R. M. Self-cleaned photoluminescent viscose fabric incorporated lanthanide-organic framework (Ln-MOF). Dyes Pigm. 159, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.07.026 (2018).
Jamila, G. S., Sajjad, S., Leghari, S. A. K. & Mahmood, T. Role of nitrogen doped carbon quantum dots on CuO nano-leaves as solar induced photo catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 138, 109233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109233 (2020).
Bayansal, F., Çetinkara, H. A., Kahraman, S., Cakmak, H. M. & Guder, H. S. Nano-structured CuO films prepared by simple solution methods: Plate-like, needle-like and network-like architectures. Ceram. Int. 38, 1859–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.10.011 (2012).
Yin, S. F., Xu, B. Q., Ng, C. F. & Au, C. T. Nano Ru/CNTs: A highly active and stable catalyst for the generation of COx-free hydrogen in ammonia decomposition. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 48, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.10.013 (2004).
Zarur, A. J. & Ying, J. Y. Reverse microemulsion synthesis of nanostructured complex oxides for catalytic combustion. Nature 403, 65–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/47450 (2000).
Zhou, K. B., Wang, R. P., Xu, B. Q. & Li, Y. D. Synthesis, characterization and catalytic properties of CuO nanocrystals with various shapes. J. Nanotechnol. 17, 3939. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/15/055 (2006).
Wang, L. & Zhu, Y. Effects of nanostructure on catalytic degradation of ethanol on SrCO3 catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 5118–5123. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp045884d (2005).
Elbein, A. D. & Molyneux, R. J. The chemistry and biochemistry of simple indolizidine and related polyhydroxy alkaloids. Alkaloids Chem. Biol. Perspect. 1987, 1–54 (1987).
Li, Q., Mitscher, L. A. & Shen, L. L. The 2-pyridone antibacterial agents: Bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors. Med. Res. Rev. 20, 231–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-1128(200007)20:4%3c231::AID-MED1%3e3.0.CO;2-N (2000).
Cox, R. J. & Hagan, D. Synthesis of isotopically labelled 3-amino-2-phenylpropionic acid and its role as a precursor in the biosynthesis of tenellin and tropic acid. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2537–2540. https://doi.org/10.1039/P19910002537 (1991).
Nagarajan, M. et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors featuring polyamine side chains on the lactam nitrogen. J. Med. Chem. 46, 5712–5724. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm030313f (2003).
Hasvold, L. A. et al. Pyridone-containing farnesyltransferase inhibitors: Synthesis and biological evaluation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13, 4001–4005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.08.058 (2003).
Ryabukhin, S. V., Plaskon, A. S., Volochnyuk, D. M. & Tolmachev, A. A. 3-Formylchromones in guareschi synthesis of 5-(2-hydroxybenzoyl)-2-pyridones. Synlett 13, 2287–2290. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-832852 (2004).
Kozikowski, A. P. et al. Identification of a more potent analogue of the naturally occurring alkaloid huperzine A. Predictive molecular modeling of its interaction with AChE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 11357–11362. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9622822 (1996).
Safaei-Ghomi, J., Shahbazi-Alavi, H., Saberi-Moghadam, M. R. & Ziarati, A. ZrP2O7 NPs: A recyclable, efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the synthesis of 1, 6-diamino-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1, 2-dihydropyridine-3, 5-dicarbonitrile derivatives via a multi-component reaction. Iran. J. Catal. 4, 289–294 (2014).
Ali, T. E. S. & Ibrahim, M. A. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of chromone-linked 2-pyridone fused with 1, 2, 4-triazoles, 1, 2, 4-triazines and 1, 2, 4-triazepines ring systems. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 21, 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532010000600010 (2010).
Ibrahim, M. A., Abdel-Rahman, R. M., Abdel-Halim, A. M., Ibrahim, S. S. & Allimony, H. A. Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel polyheterocyclic compounds containing fused 1, 2, 4-triazine moiety. ARKIVOC 16, 202–215 (2008).
Abdel-Monem, W. R. Synthesis and biological evaluation of some new fused heterobicyclic derivatives containing 1, 2, 4-triazolo/1, 2, 4-triazinopyridinone moieties. Chem. Pap.-Slovak Acad. Sci. 58, 276–285 (2004).
Seifi, M., Khajehasani, R. M. & Sheibani, H. Highly efficient method for synthesis of N-amino-2-pyridone derivatives in the presence of catalysts such as Magnesium Oxide (MgO) and Bismuth (III) Nitrate Pentahydrate (Bi (NO3)35H2O). Modern Res. Catal. 2, 8–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/mrc.2013.22A002 (2013).
Seoane, C., Soto, J. L. & Zamorano, P. Preparation of substituted 1, 6-diamino-2-oxopyridines. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 16(393–400), 1984. https://doi.org/10.1080/00304948409458667 (1984).
Mokhtarib, T. S., Sheibania, H. & Amrollahi, M. A. Poly (4-vinylpyridine) and polyaniline: As efficient and commercial available basic catalysts for the synthesis of N-amino-2-pyridones under thermal conditions or microwave irradiation. JAC 10, 116 (2014).
Zhuang, Q. Y. et al. A simple one-pot synthesis of 3, 5-dicyano-1, 2-dihydropyrid-2-ones in aqueous media. Chin. J. Chem. 25, 1568–1572. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.200790289 (2007).
Sheikhhosseini, E. & Yahyazadehfar, M. Synthesis and characterization of an Fe-MOF@ Fe3O4 nanocatalyst and its application as an organic nanocatalyst for one-pot synthesis of dihydropyrano [2, 3-c] chromenes. Front. Chem. 10, 984502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.984502 (2023).
Hootifard, G., Sheikhhosseini, E., Ahmadi, S. A. & Yahyazadehfar, M. Fe3O4@ iron-based metal–organic framework nanocomposite [Fe3O4@ MOF (Fe) NC] as a recyclable magnetic nano-organocatalyst for the environment-friendly synthesis of pyrano [2, 3-d] pyrimidine derivatives. Front. Chem. 11, 1193080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1193080 (2023).
Conde-Gonzalez, J. E., Pena-Mendez, E. M., Melian-Fernandez, A. M., Havel, J. & Salvado, V. Synthesis, performance and mechanism of nanoporous Fe-(1, 3, 5-tricarboxylic acid) metal-organic framework in the removal of anionic dyes from water. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 16, 100541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100541 (2021).
Zhu, B. J. et al. Iron and 1, 3, 5-benzenetricarboxylic metal–organic coordination polymers prepared by solvothermal method and their application in efficient as (V) removal from aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 8601–8607. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212514a (2012).
Lei, H., Cao, X., Liu, X. & Lei, J. Surfactant-assisted synthesis of Zn3(BTC)2(H3BTC= 1, 3, 5-benzenetricarboxylic acid) hollow nanoparticles. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 96, 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2018.07.031 (2018).
Sun, J. et al. Europium/1, 3, 5-benzenetricarboxylic acid metal–organic framework nanorods decorated with CdSe quantum dots as coatings for noncontact ratiometric optical temperature sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6, 12087–12094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c01852 (2023).
Wang, H., Han, H. & Ma, Z. Conductive hydrogel composed of 1, 3, 5-benzenetricarboxylic acid and Fe3+ used as enhanced electrochemical immunosensing substrate for tumor biomarker. Bioelectrochemistry 114, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2016.12.006 (2017).
El-Trass, A., ElShamy, H., El-Mehasseb, I. & El-Kemary, M. CuO nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, optical properties and interaction with amino acids. Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 2997–3001 (2012).
Babaee, S., Zarei, M., Sepehrmansourie, H., Zolfigol, M. A. & Rostamnia, S. Synthesis of metal–organic frameworks MIL-101(Cr)-NH2 containing phosphorous acid functional groups: Application for the synthesis of N-Amino-2-pyridone and pyrano [2, 3-c] pyrazole derivatives via a cooperative vinylogous anomeric-based oxidation. ACS Omega 5, 6240–6249. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02133 (2020).
Safaei-Ghomi, J., Saberi-Moghadam, M. R., Shahbazi-Alavi, H. & Asgari-Kheirabadi, M. An efficient method for the synthesis of N-amino-2-pyridones using reusable catalyst ZnO nanoparticles. J. Chem. Res. 38, 583–585. https://doi.org/10.3184/174751914X1410974394463 (2014).
Moloudi, M., Kabirifard, H. & Olia-Lavasani, A. S. Efficient and mild cyclization procedures for the synthesis of 1, 2-dihydropyridine-3, 5-dicarbonitrile and ethyl 4H-pyran-2-carboxylate derivatives catalyzed by DABCO in aqueous media. Curr. Organocatal. 5, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.2174/2213337205666180614113536 (2018).
Kshiar, B., Shangpliang, O. R. & Myrboh, B. A three component one-pot synthesis of N-amino-2-pyridone derivatives catalyzed by KF-Al2O3. Synth. Commun. 48, 1816–1827. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2018.1468467 (2018).
Safaei-Ghomi, J., Shahbazi-Alavi, H. & Ziarati, A. A comparative screening of the catalytic activity of nanocrystalline MIIZr4(PO4)6 ceramics in the one-pot synthesis of 1, 6-diamino-4-aryl-2-oxo-1, 2-dihydropyridine-3, 5-dicarbonitrile derivatives. Res. Chem. Intermed. 43, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-016-2608-6 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the Islamic Azad University (Kerman Branch), for supporting this research.
Funding
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.H.: investigation roles /writting—original draft. E.S.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review & editing. S.A., M.G., M.M. and M.Y.: formal analysis, methodology, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—review & editing. This article has been read by all authors and agreed to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hoot, N., Sheikhhosseini, E., Ahmadi, S.A. et al. Synthesis of pyridone derivatives using 2D rod like bifunctional Fe based MOF and CuO nanocomposites as a novel heterogeneous catalyst. Sci Rep 13, 15753 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43045-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43045-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
