Author Correction: Possible alleviation of symptoms and side effects through clinicians’ nocebo information and empathy in an experimental video vignette study

Author Correction: Possible alleviation of symptoms and side effects through clinicians’ nocebo information and empathy in an experimental video vignette study M. C. Meijers , J. Stouthard , A. W. M. Evers , E. Das , H. J. Drooger , S. J. A. J. Jansen , A. L. Francke , N. Plum , E. van der Wall , Y. Nestoriuc , E. Dusseldorp & L. M. van Vliet Correction to: Scientific Reports https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s4159802219729-w, published online 27 September 2022

The original version of this Article contained errors in the dataset, where one participant was incorrectly labelled as Western immigrant and should have been labelled as Native Dutch.Another participant was incorrectly labelled as Western immigrant and should have been labelled as Non-Western immigrant.
As a result, in the Abstract, "Anxiety was not influenced by empathy or information (Stai-state: p = 0.295; p = 0.390, VAS p = 0.399; p = 0.823)." now reads: "Anxiety was not influenced by empathy or information (Stai-state: p = 0.281; p = 0.410, VAS p = 0.387; p = 0.838)." In addition, in the Results section, under the subheading 'Main and interaction effects of nocebo information and empathy' , under the subheading "Nocebo information", "As demonstrated in Table 4, in controlled models the nocebo explanation did not influence APs' anxiety levels (Stai-state: p = 0.390, VAS p = 0.823), or their feelings of satisfaction, trust, and self-efficacy (p > 0.05)." now reads: "As demonstrated in Table 4, in controlled models the nocebo explanation did not influence APs' anxiety levels (Stai-state: p = 0.410, VAS p = 0.838), or their feelings of satisfaction, trust, and self-efficacy (p > 0.05)." Also in the Results section, under the subheading 'Main and interaction effects of nocebo information and empathy' , under the subheading "Empathy", "As demonstrated in Table 4, in controlled models reassurance of continuing support did not influence anxiety levels (Stai-state: p = 0.295, VAS p = 0.399) but did increase feelings of satisfaction, trust, and self-efficacy (p < 0.001)." now reads:  4, in controlled models reassurance of continuing support did not influence anxiety levels (Stai-state: p = 0.281, VAS p = 0.387) but did increase feelings of satisfaction, trust, and self-efficacy (p < 0.001)." Table 3 contained errors in mean (SD) values for "Migrant background, " "Native Dutch, " "Western immigrant, " "Non-Western immigrant".
Incorrect:   Adjustments have been made in Table 4.

Variables
The original Table 4 and accompanying legend appear below.
The original Article has been corrected.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons.org/ licen ses/ by/4.0/.

Table 4 .
Main and interaction effects of nocebo information and empathy.Significant values are in[bold].
B = standardized beta *p < 0.01 **p < 0.05 (trend significance).Transformation of these negatively skewed variables did not alter the effects, so the non-transformed variables were maintained.

Table 4
contained errors for the "Western migrant vs native Dutch" and "non-Western migrant vs native Dutch".