Introduction

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in women worldwide1. In Saudi Arabia, breast cancer is commonest cancer affecting Saudi females2. 5–10% of breast cancer and 10–15% ovarian cancer are thought to be hereditary3,4,5,6.

BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants (PVs) and likely pathogenic variants (LPVs) are known to be the main susceptibility genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC)5,7,8. The Partner and Localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) gene plays a critical role in homologous recombination repair of double standard DNA breaks for checkpoint control function through its ability to recruit BRCA2 and RAD51 to DNA breaks9,10,11,12,13,14.

Recently, PALB2 has been identified as one of the common predisposing genes for breast cancer after BRCA1/2 with penetrance estimated at 33–70% depending on age at diagnosis and family history15,16,17,18. Germline PVs/LPVs in PALB2 have also been identified in ovarian cancer and pancreatic cancer patients19,20. The prevalence of germline PALB2 PV/LPV in hereditary HBOC patients ranges between 0.8 and 1.5%21,22,23.

However, data about the prevalence of germline PALB2 variants in breast and ovarian cancers from Middle Eastern ethnicity is still scarce. Therefore, we have conducted this study in a cohort of 918 breast and ovarian cancer patients from Middle Eastern ethnicity to investigate the prevalence of germline PALB2 PVs and LPVs in breast cancer and ovarian cancer patients, and their molecular and clinicopathological characteristics in this population.

In addition, identifying the presence of recurrent and/or none PALB2 PVs/LPVs will help in understanding the contribution to breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk and tailor the best preventive and treatment option of PALB2 carriers from Middle Eastern ethnicity.

Materials and methods

Study population

The cases comprised 918 patients, 791 with breast cancer and 127 with epithelial ovarian cancer. All patients were of Saudi origin, diagnosed and treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC) from 1989 to 2016. Relaxed criteria were used to select high-risk patients. For breast cancer, the criteria used were age ≤ 50 years, positive family history of cancer, triple negative breast cancers or bilateral tumors. Similarly, age ≤ 50 years, along with positive family history of cancer were considered high risk for ovarian cancer24. In our cohort of 918 breast and ovarian cancer patients, 271 patients had a positive family history of cancer in first and/or second-degree relatives. Among the patients with positive family history, 84.5% (229/271) had a relative with one of the well-known hereditary cancers (breast, ovarian, uterine, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, brain or soft tissue sarcomas).

Detailed clinico-pathological data, including follow-up data, were noted from case records and summarized in Table 1 (breast cancer) and Table 2 (epithelial ovarian cancer). The Institutional Review Board of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre approved this study and the Research Advisory Council (RAC) of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre provided waiver of informed consent under project RAC # 2140 008, since only retrospective patient data were analyzed. It is confirmed that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Table 1 Summary of clinico-pathological variables in breast cancer patients (n = 791).
Table 2 Summary of clinico-pathological variables in epithelial ovarian cancer patients (n = 127).

DNA extraction

DNA samples were extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal tissues of breast cancer or ovarian cancer patients utilizing Gentra DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols as described in the previous study25. Two pathologists examined the histopathology slides to ensure that Normal tissues were obtained from different FFPE blocks such as uninvolved lymph nodes or non-cancerous breast tissue away from the tumor in order to minimize somatic contamination.

Capture sequencing

Targeted capture sequencing was performed on 918 samples using Illumina platform with the custom designed panel and all the quality metrics were applied as described previously26. ACMG/AMP 2015 guideline and ClinVar were utilized for interpretation of pathogenicity of variants.

Haplotype analysis

Haplotype analysis was performed using PHASE version 2.1.1 algorithm27,28. Number of variant positions, variant nucleotide positions and genotypes for each sample at those positions were supplied as an input in the algorithm. Following default parameter were set: number of iterations = 100, thinning interval = 1, burn-in = 100.

Results

Molecular results

In the entire cohort, five different types of PVs or LPVs were identified in six cases, accounting for 0.65% (6/918) of all analyzed cases. Among these five variants, four (80%) were frameshift variants while one (20%) was splicing variant. All four frameshift variants were reported previously as PV or LPV in breast cancer cases while the splicing LPV was novel (Table 3). The PV/LPV distribution in the PALB2 gene was presented in the Fig. 1.

Table 3 Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic PALB2 (NM_024675.4) variants in breast cancer.
Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the PALB2 protein with variant positions and domains. Pins represent mutation position. Number represents the number of cases with the mutation (unmarked pin represents 1 case). Red pins represent frameshift mutations; blue pin represents splice-site mutation.

In the six mutant cases, all cases were breast cancer. None of ovarian cancer cases was found to carry any PVs or LPVs in PALB2. Only one recurrent LPV, NM_024675.4:c.3425del:p.Leu1142fs was identified. This variant was present in two unrelated cases. Interestingly, this homozygous PALB2 p.Leu1142fs variant was also previously reported in two Fanconi Anemia families in our population with strong family history of multiple cancer types including Wilms tumor, neruoblastoma and acute myeloid leukemia29. Therefore, haplotype analysis was performed for these two cases utilizing Capture Sequencing data. However, the founder mutation could not be confirmed due to the limited available SNPs information extracted from capture sequencing data. In addition, it was first time that the splicing variant c.2835-2_2835-1delinsTT was reported as LPV in cancer patients. However, other PALB2 PVs or LPVs detected in our cohort were previously reported in breast cancer or ovarian cancer patients in the literature30 (Table 3).

Clinico-pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients with PALB2 PV/LPVs

Breast cancer phenotype was invasive ductal (100%) with 66.7% of hormone-receptor positive and 16.7% of triple negative tumors. All six patients had either grade 2 (66.7%) or grade III (33.3%) tumors, with majority being stage II (66.7%). Family history was positive in 33.3% (2/6) of germline PALB2 PV/LPV carriers. One of the patients had a sister with breast cancer, whereas another patient’s mother (liver cancer) and sister (breast cancer) had history of cancer. None of the patients had a personal history of other cancers. One of the patient died due to disease progression (metastasis to lung, liver, bone and brain) (Table 4).

Table 4 Clinico-pathological details of PALB2 mutated cases in breast cancer (n = 6).

Discussion

We identified six cases harboring PALB2 PVs or LPVs among 918 breast and ovarian cancer patients. The previously reported frequency rate range of PALB2 PV/LPV is from 0.1 to 1.5% depending on the population, cohort size and method of testing22,31,32,33,34. The frequency of PALB2 PV/LPV in this cohort is 0.65%, and therefore lies within the lowest frequencies reported worldwide.

In current study, all the PALB2 PVs/LPVs were identified in breast cancer cases and no PALB2 PVs or LPVs were found in ovarian cases. However, this should be interpreted with caution since the ovarian cancer cohort is small in comparing to breast cancer cohort included in this study.

The one recurrent frameshift LPV p.Leu1142fs was found in two unrelated young patients with breast cancer. Both patients have a family history of breast cancer. This recurrent PALB2 LPV identified in our cohort is particularly interesting since it was previously reported in two Fanconi anemia families with strong family history of multiple cancer types from Saudi Arabia 201629,35. We also found one submission of this alteration in the ClinVar database from different laboratories reporting germline testing of hereditary breast cancer (undisclosed ancestry)30. However, haplotype analysis based on the limited available SNPs data of two cases harboring this LPV did not confirm founder effect. Therefore, further analysis to confirm the founder effect of this LVP is needed. In addition, the patient carrying the novel LPV c.2835-2_2835-1delinsTT did not have family history of breast cancer.

Molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer cases carrying PALB2 PVs/LPVs showed that all breast cancer tumors were invasive ductal carcinoma. Majority of the tumors were histologically intermediate to high grade, positive for HER2, ER and PR expression. Young onset was apparent in all the PALB2 PV or LPV carries with all of them under the age of 50 years of age, including 4 under the age of 40.

This study has limitation; first, it is retrospective single center study where selection bias can’t be excluded. Second, the ovarian cancer cohort is relatively small to draw a conclusion regarding the absence of PALB2 PV/LPV in ovarian cancer from this ethnicity. Third, germline filtering by peripheral blood sample could not be performed, due to unavailability of such samples.

In summary, this study was able to identify the prevalence of PALB2 PV/LPV and describe the molecular and clinical characteristics of PALB2 PV/LPV carriers in Saudi Arabia. Frequency of PALB2 PV/LPV in breast cancer seems to be lower than in other population31,32,33,34. PALB2 c.3425delT:p.Leu1142fs is a recurrent LPV that seems to be responsible for one third of PALB2 mutant cases. Recent studies demonstrated that PARP inhibitor is effective in treating breast cancer patients carrying PALB2 PV or LPV, opening a new avenue of target treatment that might benefit breast cancer patients36,37. Genetic testing for relevant genes such as PALB2 must be included in molecular and genetic evaluation of breast cancer patient from this population, which could contribute, to a better understanding of breast cancer risk and implementing preventive and therapeutic strategies for breast cancer patients from Middle Eastern ethnicity.