Attraction, mobility, and preference by Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Ptinidae) to microbially-mediated volatile emissions by two species of fungi in stored grain

Insects and microbes are known to interact in a variety of ways at food facilities, compounding damage. However, little research has explicated how specific common fungal species affect the behavior of the cosmopolitan secondary stored product pest, Lasioderma serricorne. Enhanced knowledge about attraction to microbially-produced volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) may be used to manipulate insect behavior. Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides are two common, widespread pre- and postharvest fungi on small cereals that produce aflatoxins and fumonisins, respectively, while directly competing with each other for nutrients. Our goals were to (1) characterize the volatile emissions from grain inoculated by A. flavus or F. verticillioides derived from the cuticle of L. serricorne compared to uninoculated and sanitized grain, and (2) understand how MVOCs from each fungal species affects mobility, attraction, and preference by L. serricorne. Headspace collection revealed that the F. verticillioides- and A. flavus-inoculated grain produced significantly different volatiles compared to sanitized grain or the positive control. Changes in MVOC emissions affected close-range foraging during an Ethovision movement assay, with a greater frequency of entering and spending time in a small zone with kernels inoculated with A. flavus compared to other treatments. In the release-recapture assay, MVOCs were found to be attractive to L. serricorne at longer distances in commercial pitfall traps. There was no preference shown among semiochemical stimuli in a still-air, four-way olfactometer. Overall, our study suggests that MVOCs are important for close- and long-range orientation of L. serricorne during foraging, and that MVOCs may have the potential for inclusion in behaviorally-based tactics for this species.

Movement assay overall measures.The semiochemical treatments significantly affected the distance moved by adult L. serricorne over the 30-min observation periods (ANOVA: F = 541; df = 4, 86; P < 0.0001).Adult L. serricorne moved two to fourfold less when exposed to a grain kernel of one of the four semiochemical treatments compared to the negative control (Tukey HSD, Fig. 2).Adults moved numerically the least when exposed to A. flavus-inoculated grain kernels.
While velocity moved by L. serricorne showed the same numerical pattern in response to semiochemical treatments, it did not differ significantly (ANOVA: F = 1.28; df = 4, 86; P = 0.28).Overall, L. serricorne velocity Figure 1.Preference shown in the four-way, still-air olfactometer using the mean percentage of L. serricorne adults choosing a stimulus (± SE) after given a 4-min opportunity (top panel) and their mean time to decision (± SE, s; bottom panel) based on the semiochemical treatment to which they were exposed in the laboratory at the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research in Manhattan, KS.A total of n = 200 adults replicate were tested in this assay.Bars with shared letters are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).Neg.Ctrl, negative control; UV-grain, UV-sanitized grain; P. Ctrl, uninoculated grain; FS-grain, F. verticillioides-inoculated grain; AF-grain, A. flavus-inoculated grain.
Movement assay in kernel zones.The semiochemical treatments significantly affected close-range foraging by altering the frequency by which an adult L. serricorne entered each kernel zone (MANOVA: F = 11.8;df = 4, 86; P < 0.0001; Fig. 3).The semiochemical treatments significantly affected the frequency by which an adult L. serricorne entered the control kernel zone, which lacked stimuli (ANOVA: F = 3.81; df = 4, 86; P < 0.01).Adult L. serricorne were two to threefold less likely to enter the control kernel zone in the A. flavus-inoculated grain and Fusarium-inoculated grain arenas compared to the negative control or UV-sanitized grain arenas (Fig. 3).Furthermore, the frequency of adult L. serricorne entering treatment kernel zones was significantly affected by the semiochemical treatment present (ANOVA: F = 6.01; df = 4, 86; P < 0.001).There were two to threefold more entries by adult L. serricorne to the treatment kernel zone containing the A. flavus-inoculated grain than to treatment kernel zones with uninoculated grain or no grain at all (Tukey HSD, Fig. 3).Importantly, L. serricorne entered treatment kernel zones with A. flavus-inoculated grain significantly more often than the associated control kernel zones (Post-hoc: t = 2.50; df = 19; P < 0.05; Fig. 3).
The semiochemical treatment significantly affected the cumulative duration spent in each kernel zone or arena half by adult L. serricorne (MANOVA: F = 51.9;df = 4,86; P < 0.0001).Particularly, the presence of the semiochemical treatments significantly affected the duration spent in both the control kernel zone (ANOVA: F = 3.19; df = 4,86; P < 0.05) and treatment kernel zone (ANOVA: F = 50.9;df = 4,86; P < 0.0001).The mean (± SE) cumulative duration spent in the control kernel zone was short and ranged from 3 (± 1.1) to 8 (± 3.0) s over the 30-min period.By contrast, L. serricorne spent 6-17-fold more time in the treatment kernel zone containing Fusarium-inoculated grain and A. flavus-inoculated grain, respectively, compared to the treatment kernel zone in the negative control.Adult L. serricorne spent the most time in the treatment kernel zone for UV-sanitized grain and A. flavus-inoculated grain, which was approximately 40 ± 28 and 119 ± 73 s, respectively.Importantly, L. serricorne spent significantly more time in the treatment kernel zone than the control kernel zone for A. flavusinoculated grain (Post-hoc: t = 2.14; df = 19; P < 0.05).
The semiochemical treatments significantly affected the latency with which adult L. serricorne found each kernel zone or arena half (MANOVA: F = 44.7;df = 4, 86; P < 0.0001).For example, the semiochemical treatments significantly affected the latency to finding and entering the control kernel zone (ANOVA: F = 7.86; df = 4, 86; P < 0.0001) as well as the treatment kernel zone (ANOVA: F = 3.63; df = 4, 86; P < 0.01).Adult L. serricorne were two to threefold faster in finding Fusarium-inoculated grain control kernel zones than ones for UV-sanitized grain or uninoculated grain (Fig. 3).All semiochemical treatments in treatment kernel zones had a similar latency to being found and entered by L. serricorne except A. flavus-inoculated grain, which resulted in 1.5-fold higher latency than the other treatments.

Movement assay in arena halves.
The frequency by which an adult L. serricorne entered the control half varied significantly among the semiochemical treatments (ANOVA: F = 5.21; df = 4, 86; P < 0.001).Adults entered control halves rarely, on average between 2 and 5 times over the 30 min period, corresponding to the Fusarium-inoculated grain and UV-sanitized grain treatment respectively (Fig. 4).Moreover, the frequency of entering the treatment half by an adult L. serricorne was significantly affected by the semiochemical treatment (ANOVA: F = 6.30; df = 4, 86; P < 0.001).There were each about twofold less frequent entries by adult L. serricorne to treatment halves with A. flavus-inoculated and Fusarium-inoculated grain compared to the negative control.Importantly, each semiochemical treatment in the treatment half resulted in significantly more entries than the corresponding control half (Post-hoc paired t-test, Bonferroni correction; Fig. 4).
By contrast, the semiochemical treatments did not significantly affect the cumulative duration spent in both control half (ANOVA: F = 1.12; df = 4,86; P = 0.35) nor in the treatment half (ANOVA: F = 0.81; df = 4,86; P = 0.52).Adult L. serricorne spent a range of 519-875 s in the control halves, on average, associated with the UV-sanitized and negative control treatment, respectively.Adults spent an average duration ranging from 584 to 902 s in the treatment halves, which corresponded to the uninoculated-and A. flavus-inoculated grain, respectively.Importantly, the cumulative duration spent in the A. flavus-inoculated treatment half was significantly more than the control half (Post-hoc: t = 2.01; df = 19; P < 0.05), as was the cumulative duration spent in the UV-sanitized treatment half compared to the control half (t = 2.56; df = 19; P < 0.01).
The semiochemical treatments significantly affected the latency to entering the control half (ANOVA: F = 28.1;df = 4,86; P < 0.0001) and treatment half (ANOVA: F = 13.7;df = 4,86; P < 0.0001) of the arenas.It took L. serricorne www.nature.com/scientificreports/adults 4-13-fold longer to find control halves associated with UV-sanitized, uninoculated-, AF-inoculated grain, and Fusarium-inoculated grain semiochemical treatments compared to the negative control (Fig. 4).By contrast, L. serricorne were three to fourfold faster in finding the treatment halves associated with Fusarium-inoculated and A. flavus-inoculated grain compared to the negative control.Numerically, L. serricorne adults were over threefold faster in finding UV-sanitized treatment halves compared to control halves, while adults were twofold faster in finding A. flavus-inoculated treatment halves compared to control halves.
Release-recapture assay.In total, the percent of adults recaptured out of 800 was 41%, ranging between 26 and 51%.The attractant in the trap significantly affected recapture of L. serricorne in commercially-available pitfall traps (ANOVA: F = 7.11; df = 4,35; P < 0.001; Fig. 5).In fact, the greatest recapture was in traps baited with UV-sanitized, uninoculated-, and A. flavus-inoculated grain, which each captured approximately twofold more L. serricorne than the negative control.Traps baited with Fusarium-inoculated grain captured an intermediate percentage of L. serricorne.

Discussion
Overall, this is the first study to examine in an in-depth manner how specific fungal species affect the behavior of adult L. serricorne, particularly how MVOCs from fungi may be used as foraging cues to manipulate insect attraction, mobility, and preference in the post-harvest environment.We included multiple behavioral assays (e.g., four-way olfactometer for preference, video-tracking to evaluate close-range foraging decisions, and a releaserecapture assay to determine long-distance attraction) all to ultimately characterize how L. serricorne responds to MVOCs and interacts with microbes.Here, we show that inoculating grain with known plant pathogens has direct implications on the MVOCs produced, and in turn, this affects the behavior of an external-infesting stored product pest, L. serricorne.We found that this is true at both close-range and at distance.This may be a result of the fact that L. serricorne evolved from a lineage of insects that likely infested animal caches 4,36 , which are hypothesized to preferentially be attracted to MVOCs as a reliable host cue.MVOCs may be reliable cues in this situation because animals often forget or do not use many of their caches 41 , leaving them to mold in temperate environments.It may be possible L. serrcorne responds specifically to A. flavus due to its prevalent frequency in flour 25 , and its propensity especially for xeric conditions 28 , which is a propensity shared by L. serricorne 11 .By contrast, F. verticillioides prefers more moist or humid environments.While there is abundant data that there are close symbioses between L. serricorne and Symbiotaphrina, there is no support for this for A. flavus and F. www.nature.com/scientificreports/verticillioides, which we isolated from the beetle cuticle.It is more likely, these fungi were already present on the grain, and L. serricorne acted as a physical vector, though certainly the microbial community has been known to create microclimates in grain and have an effect on the insect community under some conditions (Ponce and Morrison, unpublished data).Together, this presents a convincing case for the importance of insect-microbe interactions on the foraging ecology of L. serricorne.Below, we go over each of the main results in turn.We found close-range foraging by L. serricorne is affected by grain and MVOCs.Altogether, the volatile emissions from inoculated grain by the fungal morphotype significantly affects the foraging decisions by L. serricorne both when in close-proximity and at a distance to the inoculated grain as compared to uninoculated and sanitized grain.In fact, this supports prior work showing that there are a variety of ecological and behavioral Table 1.Summary of headspace volatiles emitted (in ng h −1 g −1 grain) from grain that was uninoculated (P.ctrl), surface sanitized with UV-radiation for 10-min (UV-grain), or inoculated with A. flavus or Fusarium spp.for periods of 3 h using a push headspace collection system.There were n = 7 replicates per treatment, and mean emission rates per compound are portrayed.a Compound identity confirmed by co-injecting technical standard onto same column.

Mean ± SE % of Total Mean ± SE % of Total Mean ± SE % of Total Mean ± SE % of Total
4-Ethylbenzamide 4.26 0.00 ± 0.00 0 0.00 ± 0.00 0 0.00 ± 0.00 0 0.17 ± 0. responses by insects to volatile emissions from microbes 7 .At close-range, L. serricorne used volatiles from Aspergillus flavus-inoculated grain for foraging decisions, and this was reflected in some differentiation in the volatile composition from the A. flavus treatment compared to the other treatments.Similarly, another stored product pest, S. oryzae, oriented to MVOCs from A. flavus-inoculated grain at close-ranges, but preferred to use only grain volatiles at a distance 10 .Interestingly, our results also showed that grain without microbes (i.e.UV-sanitized grain) was also an attractive source for L. serricorne at close-range and a distance.In particular, our work showed that the presence of UV-sanitized and A. flavus-inoculated grain increased the cumulative duration spent in and the frequency of entering each of those kernel zones.Once L. serricorne entered the UV-sanitized or microbial-inoculated kernel zones, their movement was arrested.In the experiment, mixed-sex adults were used because of difficulty distinguishing sexes as adults.However, males and females may be under different selection pressures.For example, males may be more motivated to disperse, and as such may seek advantages conferred from microbial partners to use intact grain that they may not otherwise have access to (mentioned as a hypothesis in Ponce et al. 4 ).By contrast, females may be under selective pressure to find optimal oviposition locations that would be free from microbial contamination for progeny.Follow-up work could find support for this hypothesis by sexing L. serricorne when they are pupae, then repeating the experiment to determine if there are differences in response to these two stimuli that break down along sex-based lines.In terms of food  kairomones that affect foraging, volatiles from Capsicum products were found to be significantly more attractive to L. serricorne than products without Capsicum (e.g., cracked wheat, corn, tobacco, mineral oil, grape seed oil, rolled oats, coriander seeds, and sesame oil) 42 .In prior work, the fungal volatile, 1-octen-3-ol was a strong attractant for the stored product beetle, Ahaversus advena (Waltl) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) 43 supporting the contention that stored product insects use MVOCs in foraging decisions.Overall, our work confirms that L. serricorne response to MVOCs is microbe species-dependent, and volatiles from A. flavus-inoculated grain elicit a behavioral response at close-and long-range by the insect.
Here, we found that adult L. serricorne moved two to fourfold less and their velocity was numerically decreased by 2-threefold when exposed to a grain kernel of one of the four semiochemical treatments compared to the negative control.This suggests that one of the key processes happening at close range in response to the grain is arrestment, demonstrated by slower and less movement of L. serricorne in response to the semiochemicals.Prior work has documented the sublethal effects of insecticide, dispersal, and foraging using distance moved and velocity as surrogates of movement 44 that can be mediated by good and poor sanitation 45 .However, prior work has rarely evaluated response to MVOCs using velocity or distance moved.Nevertheless, Lizarraga 46 found a numeric decrease in the distance moved and velocity when S. oryzae were exposed to the uninoculated grain, but this was not significantly different from the negative control or any other treatment.McFarlane 47 used Ethovision and found an important stored product pest, the red flour beetle, T. castaneum most often spent time in a wind tunnel adjacent to an empty arena instead of one with a stimulus containing the fungus, Aspergillus tubingensis.Most other work with Ethovision has been on the sublethal effects of insecticides [48][49][50][51][52] demonstrating an overlooked tool in understanding the effect of MVOCs on the behavioral and chemical ecology of stored product pests.
While prior studies have directly assessed response to pure fungal volatiles bought from a supplier or synthesized 43,[53][54][55] , our study links inoculation of grain by specific microbes with changes in MVOC headspace profiles and determined the implications for L. serricorne behavior.We found a total of 44 tentatively identified, but distinct principal compounds in the headspace emissions from clean and fungal-inoculated grain.There were unique cues in the fungal-inoculated grain, but fungal identity, and by consequence, compound identity appears to matter for behavioral response by L. serricorne.Fusarium verticillioides-inoculated grain was significantly different than the other treatments, yet it did not elicit the same change in behavior as the A. flavus-inoculated grain, which showed more overlap with the other treatments.Thus, minor compounds uniquely emitted by or emitted in unique ratios by A. flavus, but not present in the other treatments (Table 1), may be important for the behavioral response of L. serricorne.For example, both 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-1-hexanol and 2-(1-propenyl)-6-methylphenol-butanoic acid were only present in A. flavus-inoculated grain and not in any other treatment.Interestingly, Ponce et al. 4 found that 3-octanone, 1-octen-3-ol, octane, 3-methyl-1-butanol and many others were the most commonly tested MVOCs for behavioral effects against stored-product arthropods, and we found a subset of these in the headspace emissions here.Similarly, Sinha 56 found 3-methyl-1-butanol, 1-octen-3-ol, and 3-octanone were the most common compounds isolated in experimental grain bins, which supports some of the headspace volatiles emitted from grain in our experiment.In addition, many of the compounds occurring in the A. flavus-and Fusarium-inoculated grain were unique compared to the uninoculated-or UV-sanitized grain (Table 1), including 2-(1-propenyl)-6-methylphenol-butanoic acid, cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, and octane for A. flavus-inoculated grain and 2-epi-α-cadrene, a long-chain alkene, and 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethoxy-benzene for Fusarium-inoculated grain.Overall, the total emission rate for volatiles produced by Fusarium-inoculated grain is three to fivefold several magnitudes higher, than the uninoculated grain.While overall volatile emissions among fungal-inoculated grain were similar, the identity of the volatiles varied.This may lead to the differences observed insect behavior.In the future, complex blends of MVOCs emitted by common fungi should be evaluated against stored product insects using gas chromatography coupled with electroantennography (GC-EAD) in order to determine which volatiles are perceived by individuals.Further investigation of the MVOCs on foraging behavior of stored product insects may lead to promising candidate compounds that are behaviorally-active to manipulate pest populations in management tactics at food facilities 36,57 .
No preference was found by L. serricorne among the semiochemical stimuli including UV-sanitized grain, uninoculated grain, F. verticillioides-inoculated grain, A. flavus-inoculated grain and the negative control using the four-way olfactometer.This could be because there may have been a thigmotactic reaction to the glass substrate by L. serricorne.Other stored product species have been documented to exhibit thigmotactic responses to netting, for example 58 , though this has not been documented for L. serricorne.Additionally, it is possible that while some of the treatments have attractant or arresting properties as individual bouquets, complex blends admixing in the headspace of the release chamber may result in no preference among each other.Prior work has confirmed that volatiles are able to quickly and adequately diffuse by Brownian motion over the allotted trial period in the assay 10 .Thus, performance of this assay in the biosafety cabinet did not prevent volatiles from reaching test subjects, and was a valid test of the odor treatments.Prior work found that the invasive stored product dermestid Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) showed attraction to pheromonal and kairomonal stimuli that were not perfectly congruous with the results from work in related preference assays for the same stimuli 59 .Gerken et al. 60 found that even with the same species (e.g., T. castaneum), one could obtain different results using multiple behavioral assays, and suggested that one must carefully select the assays and consider the actual variables being tested.However, the lack of a positive response in only one out of the multiple assays to headspace by A. flavus in this study suggests that there is a relatively robust response to the mVOCs from this microbial species by L. serricorne.
In the future, research should be prioritized to (1) address which compounds identified in Table 1 are actually detected by L. serricorne through GC-EAD, (2) follow-up on GC-EAD results with behavioral tests to determine whether the compounds are attractive, repellent, or neutral, and (3) formulate new lures with the most attractive compounds to improve monitoring and management programs.This will help narrow the behaviorallyactive components of the headspace blends to those that are being detected by the insect.Overall, this study www.nature.com/scientificreports/has enhanced our understanding of how microbially-produced volatiles organic compounds from postharvest fungal grain pathogens affect the behavior of L. serricorne.Increasingly, it is apparently essential to manage microbes and insects simultaneously in the postharvest agricultural supply to ensure that our planet can feed its growing population.

Materials and methods
Source insects.Fungal morphotype culturing.To initially isolate the two fungal morphotypes, L. serricorne were allowed to disperse on agar.A total of 32 g of potato dextrose agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was mixed with 900 ml of deionized water in a 1000-mL glass media bottle with a magnetic stirring rod placed inside the bottle.The agar solution was autoclaved (533LS, Getinge, Rochester, NY, USA) for 30 min and then stirred on a hot plate to cool down for 20 min.Before pouring the potato agar solution into petri dishes (100 × 15), the biosafety cabinet (75 × 73 × 95 cm L:H:W, #302381101, Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) was sanitized with 70% ethanol and exposed to UV light for 10 min.A total of 36 petri dishes with potato dextrose agar solution were left in the biosafety cabinet to solidify overnight.A single L. serricorne was introduced into to a single PDA dish and microbial growth was visualized after 3 and 5 d.Each PDA plate was sealed with parafilm, and stored in an environmental chamber under constant conditions of 30 °C, 60% RH, and 14:10 L:D photoperiod.Transfer of L. serricorne from containers to agar was performed inside the biosafety cabinet to prevent contamination.Pictures of the agar dishes and corresponding microbial growth were acquired using a DSLR camera (EOS 7D Mark II, Canon, Tokyo, Japan) mounted to 3D imaging StackShot (CogniSys, Inc., Traverse City, MI, USA) equipped with a dual flash (MT-26EX-RT, Canon, Tokyo, Japan).Light was diffused using a partially cut frosted plastic jar (15.2 × 7.6 cm D:H) making a total of 12 replicates.From the fungal isolation, two fungal morphotypes were selected by close examination of microbial characteristics such as spore shape, size, and color.Morphologically, A. flavus often appears yellowish or green in pigment, while F. graminearum often appears white (Fig. 8).This was used to generate the two primary morphotypes for the rest of the assays in the experiments below, and to generate sequences for the morphotypes.
Treatments.To study how MVOCs affected L. serricorne behavior, the two morphotypes identified above were introduced to grain and compared to uninoculated and UV-sanitized grain in various behavioral assays.The uninoculated grain treatment (e.g., P. ctrl hereafter) consisted of 10 g of hard winter wheat at a 10.6% moisture content taken directly from cold storage (Table 2).UV-sanitized grain was as above but treated with ultraviolet radiation for 10 min in the biosafety cabinet (75 × 73 × 95 cm L:H:W, #302381101, Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) to surface sterilize.Grain inoculated by specific fungal species included Fusarium-inoculated grain (e.g.F. verticillioides, determined by sequencing, see below: FS, hereafter) and A. flavus-inoculated grain (AF, hereafter) (Fig. 8).In order to develop uniform, inoculated cultures on grain, our process was modelled on mushroom farming techniques with boiling 61 .To prepare the Fusarium-inoculated grain, 600 g of grain was transferred to a stainless-steel pot filled with water and placed on a hot plate at 100 °C.Once boiling for 15 min, the water was drained and the grain was evenly spread out on sterile wipes (38.1 × 42.5 cm, 3 ply, Tech wipes, Skilcraft, NIB, Alexandria, VA) and dried inside a laminar flow hood (ca. 3 h).Afterwards, grain was evenly divided (~ 300 g) and placed in 2 separate autoclaved mason jars (950-mL capacity).A single hole was pierced through each lid and lined with a cotton ball.The jars were then sealed with aluminum foil and were autoclaved (533LS, Getinge, Rochester, NY, USA) for 30 min.To inoculate with Fusarium spp. or A. flavus, a 3-inch agar plug of fungi was placed into each jar containing the grain.The plug had been colonized and growing without contamination in a petri dish for 7-10 days in an environmental chamber set to 30 °C, 60% RH, and 14:10 L:D photoperiod (Supplementary Fig. 2).Jars with freshly prepared Fusarium-inoculated grain sat at room temperature for roughly 10-15 days or until the fungi evenly covered as much of the grain as possible.Grain was never used more than once for each replicate of every trial in each assay experiment to prevent cross contamination.

Microbial morphotype sequencing.
To identify microbes associated with the cuticle of L. serricorne, fungal morphotypes were isolated from cuticles and cultured for the purpose of sequencing.Pure isolations from the two morphotypes were made by excising a 1 × 1 cm agar plug of fungi and subculturing it onto a new potato dextrose agar dish, sealed with parafilm to obtain a pure culture.DNA was extracted from pure cultures after 7 days of growth in an environmental chamber set to 30 °C, 60% RH, and 14:10 L:D photoperiod using the Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe Miniprep Kit (D6010, Zymo Research Corp, Irvine, CA, USA).Concentration of DNA and quality were assessed using the Take 3 Assay on a microplate reader (Gen5™, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) before performing the PCR.
Four-way olfactometer.In order to assess preference by L. serricorne among the stimuli, a still-air fourway olfactometer was used.This device (Sigma Scientific, LLC., Micanopy, FL, USA) consisted of a cylindrical central release glass chamber (9.0 × 12.1 cm D: H) with exit ports (2.5 × 3.5 cm D:L) at each cardinal direction connecting the central chamber to four identical glass chambers (7.0 × 11.5 cm D:H) where 10 g of each odor source was placed (Table 2).The bottom of the release arena was acid-etched to provide a surface over which insects could easily crawl.Each of the four outer chambers were spaced at a 90° angle from each other.Inert septa buffered and sealed each component.A removable glass lid with a hole was used to cover the top of the main central glass chamber to allow for airflow, but also prevent insects from exiting.A single L. serricorne was released into the middle of the central arena for each bioassay and given a maximum of 4 min to make a decision to choose one of the stimuli.A choice was considered to have been made when the individual traveled 2.54 cm www.nature.com/scientificreports/into the adjoining 1-way exit port that branched off to the odor chamber.After every 5 replicates, the entire olfactometer was rotated 90° to control for positional effects.After every 15 replicates, the whole apparatus was washed first with methanol followed by hexane, and a new, independent set of each treatment was used, with the grain replaced.The time to decision and choice of odor treatment were recorded and an individual insect was never tested more than once.Non-responsive (NR) insects were also recorded, but excluded from the final statistical analysis.The assay was conducted in a biosafety cabinet to maintain a constant flow of air and odor.A total of n = 200 replicate individuals were tested.

Movement assay.
A movement assay was used to assess if fungal inoculated grain impacted close-range foraging behavior of L. serricorne.This was accomplished through the use of video-tracking with a network camera (GigE Network Camera, Basler AG, Germany), suspended using a pole and clamp 80 cm above the test arenas, coupled with Ethovision Software (Noldus Inc., Leesburg, VA, USA).The test arenas consisted of five petri dishes (100 × 15 mm) with 85 mm diameter filter paper adhered to the bottom of the petri dish with double sided tape, on an artist's lightbox, each containing a single L. serricorne and a single treatment kernel (Table 2).Each test arena was halved vertically, with the left half designated for the control half (e.g., no kernel) and the right half for the treatment half.Embedded within each half of the arenas were 1.16 cm diameter control kernel zones or treatment kernel zones, located midway and halfway on each respective half (Supplemental Fig. 1).These were coded as hidden zones in Ethovision and the smaller treatment kernel zones were where the grain treatments were placed, consisting of a single kernel of each treatment listed in Table 2.A single L. serricorne was released at the midpoint in the center of each arena.Trials lasted for a period of 30 min.The Ethovison software automatically measured several variables including the total distance moved, the cumulative duration of time spent in each half/kernel zone, the frequency of entry to each half/kernel zone, and latency to entering the half/ kernel zone.The location of each treatment was randomized between each replicate to control any positional bias.There was a total of n = 20 replicates per treatment.No petri dish, filter paper, or adult was ever used more than once.
Release-recapture assay.A trapping assay was utilized to determine how microbial fungal volatiles impact the capture by L. serricorne in monitoring traps at a longer distance.In a large, walk-in environmental chamber (5 × 6 × 2 m, L:W:H), plastic bins (86.3 × 30.5 × 39.4 cm L:H:W) were set up to perform the experiment under constant environmental conditions (28 °C, 59% RH, 14:10 L:D).A ring of polytetrafluoroethylene (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) around the top and bottom of the plastic bins was added to prevent insects from climbing out of the bins.The bottom of the bins was roughened with sandpaper to provide traction.The traps consisted of commercially-available pitfall traps (Storgard, Trece, Adair, OK, USA) with two connectible pieces 68,69 , containing a central well where the treatments were added as bait.Traps were baited with treatments in Table 2 and placed in one corner inside the bins.A total of 20 adult, mixed-sex L. serricorne were released in the corner diagonal and on the opposite side from where the trap was placed.The positions of traps were randomized in a different corner inside the bin to reduce any positional bias between each replicate.The insects were given 24 h to respond to stimuli.Afterwards, traps were collected, and the number of insects recaptured was recorded.A total of n = 8 replicate releases were performed per treatment.

MVOC headspace collection.
To determine how microbial colonization impacted volatile emissions from grain, headspace collections were performed on fungal-inoculated, uninoculated, and UV-treated grain.The headspace volatile collection apparatus consisted of four 500-ml glass chambers, each with an air inlet and outlet.Central air was first purified, then regulated with a flow meter to 1 L/m, after which it entered the headspace chamber via PTFE tubing and was collected onto a volatile collection trap (VCT).Each glass chamber was secured during headspace volatile collection with a plastic lid and a PTFE-faced butyl septum.After each use, chambers were washed with methanol first followed by hexane inside a laminar fume hood.The VCT consisted of an angled drip-tip collection point borosilicate glass tube with a mesh (Stainless Steel #316 screen), packed with 20 mg of PoraPak-Q™ chemical absorbent held in place with a borosilicate glass wool plug, and followed by a PTFE Teflon™ compression seal, which was used to collect and concentrate MVOCs over 3 h periods from 20 g of each treatment (Table 2).Background volatiles were also collected from empty glass chambers as a negative control.Volatiles were eluted from VCTs inside the fume hood with 150 µL of dichloromethane, which was pushed through with N 2 gas into labeled 2 mL GC vials with 150-µL glass inserts with PTFE polymer feet and magnetic seal caps.Using a microsyringe (2-μl capacity, Hamilton Co., Reno, NV, USA), 1 µL of internal standard (190.5 ng tetradecane) was added to each sample.Between each use, the syringe was washed with 2 µL of dichloromethane in triplicate to avoid cross contamination between samples.All headspace samples were sealed with Teflon tape and stored at − 13 °C until GC-MS analysis below.For reuse of VCT, traps were washed in triplicate with 700 µL of dichloromethane, which was pushed through with N 2 gas.

MVOC GC-MS analysis.
All headspace collection sample extracts were run on an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with an Agilent Durabond HP-5 column (30 m length, 0.250 mm diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness) with He as the carrier gas at a constant 1.2 mL/min flow and 40 cm/s velocity.This was coupled with a single-quadrupole Agilent 5997B mass spectrometer (MS).The compounds were separated by auto-injecting 1 μl of each sample under split mode into the GC-MS at room temperature (approximately 23 °C).The flow was split in a 15:1 ratio with a split flow rate of 18 ml/min.The GC program consisted of 40 °C for 1 min followed by 10 °C/min increases to 300 °C and then held for 26.5 min.After a solvent delay of 3 min, mass ranges between 50 and 550 atomic mass units were scanned.Compounds were tentatively identified by comparison of spectral data with those from the NIST 17 library and by GC retention index 70 .Using the ratio of the peak area for the internal standard to the peak area for the other compounds in the headspace, the emission rates of samples was normalized in ng of volatile per g of grain, per μl of solvent, and per h of collection were calculated.

Statistical analysis.
In order to analyze the quantitative data from the vectoring assay, the mean greyscale value was used as the response variable in a linear model.Semiochemical treatment (Table 2) was included as a fixed, explanatory variable.Residuals were inspected to validate assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity.If these assumptions were not met, log -transformed data were used, which then satisfied both assumptions.Upon a significant result of the model, Tukey HSD was used for multiple comparisons and implemented using the function ghlt from the package multcomp in R Software.R software 71 was used for this and all other tests, with α = 0.05 except where noted.
To analyze the data from the four-way olfactometer, a Chi-squared test was performed with a Bonferroni adjustment to the α-threshold.The null hypothesis assumed that there was an equal probability that an insect would choose one of the four sides.
To analyze how grain and microbial volatiles affect the mobility and foraging of L. serricorne during videotracking, a generalized linear model based on a Gaussian distribution with a log-link function was used.In particular, separate models were used for the distance moved, and instantaneous velocity as response variables, while the explanatory variable included the odor treatment included in each test arena (e.g. from Table 2).To detect behavioral differences in this assay, the frequency of entering each zone, cumulative duration spent in each zone, and latency to finding each zone were each analyzed using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with the semiochemical treatments as a fixed explanatory variable.Upon a significant overall result, sequential ANOVAs were performed for each variable.For responses with significant ANOVAs, multiple comparisons were performed with Tukey HSD.Post-hoc t-tests were performed as a contrast between the two means of treatment vs. control zone and treatment vs. control kernel zone to assess differences within a semiochemical treatment with a Bonferroni-corrected alpha-threshold for multiple testing.
To analyze the data from the release-recapture assay, a generalized linear model based on a Poisson distribution and log link function was used.The response was the number of L. serricorne recaptured in traps for a particular stimulus.The explanatory variable included the odor treatments from Table 2. Overdispersion was not found to be a problem.Upon a significant result from the model, multiple comparisons in a generalized linear model framework were implemented using the function ghlt (e.g.Tukey HSD) from the package multcomp in R Software.
To characterize the change in headspace volatiles with inoculation of fungi in grain, raw peak areas were extracted from the gas chromatograms using MSD ChemStation v2.00 software (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).The emission rate was calculated on a ng per gram of grain weight and per hour basis by using the ratio of the peak area for tetradecane to each headspace volatile.Background volatiles found in the negative control without grain were discarded from the other samples, since these represent transient background volatiles.Pairwise Bray-Curtis similarities were calculated between each headspace sample, and non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) was used to visualize the differences in volatile profiles among treatments.A total of n = 1000 permutations were used for the ordination procedure.Stress values for the NMDS procedure were < 0.1, indicating that good interpretation was possible.An analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was used to determine significant differences for headspace volatile profiles among odor treatment categories.ANOSIM calculates an R statistic that can vary from 1 to − 1, with values above zero interpreted as greater dissimilarity between treatments than within and values below zero interpreted as greater dissimilarity within treatments than between treatments.A total of n = 1000 permutations were performed for the test.For all multivariate statistics, the R Package vegan was used 72 .To assess differences in the complexity of the headspace blends (e.g.number of compounds per treatment), pairwise chi-square tests were performed among treatments with the null hypothesis of an equal number of compounds identified from each treatment.To determine differences in overall quantitative emissions of volatiles, pairwise t-tests among means were performed using a Bonferronicorrection to the P-value.
Ethics declaration.These studies adhered to the highest US and international standards for scientific integrity.No humans or vertebrate animals were used in these experiments.This BSL-2 research is covered and approved through the Institutional Biosafety Committee at Kansas State University under approved permit IBC#1437 through 3/17/2023.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Metrics from the movement assay assessing the effects of MVOCs on mean distance moved (± SE, top panel) and the mean instantaneous velocity (± SE, bottom panel) by adult L. serricorne over a period of 30 min using a network camera coupled with Ethovision in the laboratory at the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research in Manhattan, KS.There were a total of n = 20 replicates per treatment, translating to 50 h of data in this assay.Bars with shared letters are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).Neg.Ctrl, negative control; UV-grain, UV-sanitized grain; P. Ctrl, uninoculated grain; FS-grain, F. verticillioides-inoculated grain; AF-grain, A. flavus-inoculated grain.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Treatment (dark orange bars) and control (dark yellow bars) kernel zone metrics from the movement assay, including determining how MVOCs affect the mean (± SE) frequency of entering each kernel zone (top panel), the cumulative duration spent in each kernel zone (middle panel), and the latency to finding and entering each kernel zone (bottom panel) by adult L. serricorne for a period of 30 min using video-tracking with a network camera coupled with Ethovision Software in the laboratory at the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research in Manhattan, KS.The treatment kernel zone contains a single hard winter wheat kernel, while the control kernel zone does not contain any stimuli (neg.ctrl).There was a total of n = 20 replicate adults tested per treatment, translating to 50 h of data in this assay.Upper case letters represent multiple comparisons among levels of the control kernel zones only, while lower case letters represent multiple comparisons among levels of the treatment kernel zones only.Bars with shared letters are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).Asterisks (*) indicate post-hoc comparisons using paired t-tests (with Bonferroni correction), and only significant results have been displayed on applicable bars.Neg.Ctrl, negative control; UV-grain, UV-sanitized grain; P. Ctrl, uninoculated grain; FS-grain, F. verticillioides-inoculated grain; AF-grain, A. flavus-inoculated grain.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Treatment (orange bars) and control (yellow bars) zone metrics from the movement assay, including determining how MVOCs affect the mean (± SE) frequency of entering each zone (top panel), the cumulative duration spent in each zone (middle panel), and the latency to finding and entering each zone (bottom panel) by adult L. serricorne for a period of 30 min using video-tracking with a network camera coupled with Ethovision Software in the laboratory at the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research in Manhattan, KS.The treatment zone contains a single hard winter wheat kernel, while the control zone does not contain any stimuli (neg.ctrl).There was a total of n = 20 replicate adults tested per treatment, translating to 50 h of data in this assay.Upper case letters represent multiple comparisons among levels of the control zones only, while lower case letters represent multiple comparisons among levels of the treatment zones only.Bars with shared letters are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).Asterisks (*) indicate post-hoc comparisons using paired t-tests (with Bonferroni correction), and only significant results have been displayed on applicable bars.Neg.Ctrl, negative control; UV-grain, UV-sanitized grain; P. Ctrl, uninoculated grain; FS-grain, F. verticillioides-inoculated grain; AF-grain, A. flavus-inoculated grain.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The mean percentage of adult L. serricorne recaptured in the release-recapture assay in response to MVOCs and grain used as lures in commercially-available monitoring pitfall traps, with a total of 20 adult, mixed-sex L. serricorne released in large plastic bins and placed in a large, walk-in environmental chamber under constant abiotic conditions and given 24 h to respond at the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research in Manhattan, KS for a total of n = 8 replicate releases per treatment.Bars with shared letters are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD, α = 0.05).

Figure 6 .
Figure6.Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling ordination plot based on pairwise Bray-Curtis similarity index calculated between each combination of volatile emissions (ng h −1 g −1 grain) by samples after headspace collection for 3 h from 20 g of grain that was UV sanitized for 10 min (blue circles), inoculated with A. flavus (yellow circles), inoculated with Fusarium spp (red circles), or uninoculated (brown circles).There were n = 7 replicates per semiochemical treatment.Polygons represent convex hulls drawn between samples and are color coded similarly to treatments.There were a total of n = 1000 permutations, and stress was < 0.10, enabling adequate interpretation.UV-grain, UV-sanitized grain; P. Ctrl, uninoculated grain; FS-grain, F. verticillioidesinoculated grain; AF-grain, A. flavus-inoculated grain.
Adult cigarette beetles, Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera: Ptinidae), were used from insect colonies that were originally collected in 2012 from a rice mill in Arkansas and continuously maintained on a diet of 95% bleached wheat flour and 5% brewer's yeast with oats sprinkled on top and a moistened, crumpled towel added.Colonies were kept at the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service's (USDA-ARS) Center for Grain and Animal Health Research facility in Manhattan, KS.Insects were routinely subcultured by sieving (No. 30 sieve, 594 × 594 µm mesh, W.S. Tyler Co., Cleveland, OH, USA) 150 mixed-sex L. serricorne adults from diet mixtures, transferring them into new mason jars (950-ml capacity) filled two-thirds of the way to the top with diet, and then placed inside environmental chambers under constant conditions at 27.5 °C, 65% RH, and 14:10 L:D photoperiod.Individuals used in bioassays described below were never tested more than once.

Table 2 .
List of semiochemical treatments and the amounts used in each assay during the study.