Because of the steep subduction of a highly concave slab, researchers have characterized megathrusts under the Marianas as among the coldest and curviest plate coupling interfaces in various circum-Pacific subduction zones. Seismic tomography indicates that the heterogeneous underlying plate varies markedly in its subduction angle, velocity, and flexure along the strike and dip, while their effects on the thermal structure and intraslab earthquake occurrence remain enigmatic. By incorporating the 3-D MORVEL velocity and state-of-the-art slab geometry into thermomechanical modeling, we estimated the 3-D subduction thermal state and hydrothermal regime below the Marianas. We find that (1) the concave slab geometry and the complexity of the intraslab velocity variation in the Marianas are associated with a heterogeneous along-strike thermal regime and a cold mantle wedge beneath the central Marianas; (2) amphibolitization and eclogitization of subducted oceanic crust cause variations in fluid pressure and fluid release from the subduction interface, which may influence the distribution of interface seismicity in the Mariana system; (3) the concentration of active hydrothermal vents in the trench > 8 km deep is accompanied by a large temperature gradient and subsequent remarkable slab dehydration in the southern Marianas; and (4) slab dehydration (> 0.02 wt%/km) from 30 to 80 km indicates notable fluid release and potential fluid migration in subduction channels, which may correspond to the large water flux at depth beneath the Marianas.
The Izu‒Bonin–Mariana (IBM) arc system represents an interoceanic convergent margin, where one of the oldest seafloor regions on the planet has been subducting since 43 Ma1 (Figs. 1 and 2). This system experienced two stages of back-arc spreading, forming the Parece Basin between the Palau–Kyushu Ridge and western Mariana Ridge (30–15 Ma) and the Mariana Trough between the western Mariana Ridge and the Mariana arc (7 Ma-present)2. Active back-arc extension driven by asthenospheric upwelling marks one of the most significant features of the Mariana subduction zone that is caused by steep subduction3. The various slab morphologies that have been further studied in numerical models imply that trench rollback is usually associated with the balance of the force resulting from slab stagnation or penetration in subduction dynamics4,5.
Seismogenic megathrusts below the Mariana have constrained the seismicity to less than M86,7. The recurrence of M6 earthquakes in the Mariana is several per year, and most of them are intermediate–deep earthquakes with depths of > 100 km. Historical M7 earthquakes have struck the Mariana as few as once per decade, and the 2016 M7.7 earthquake (212 km depth) 60 km SSE of Agrihan and 2007 M7.5 earthquake (261 km depth) 280 km NW of Farallon de Pajaros have occurred in recent decades. In general, M < 5 earthquakes are more frequently observed and geographically adjacent to the southern Marianas than to the central and northern portions (Fig. 1). This phenomenon probably reflects the differences in fault properties, which are determined by geophysical factors, such as the convergence rate and obliquity, plate dip, age, and geometry8. Subduction seismicity is thus likely controlled by the subduction thermal structure or slab tears9,10,11. For example, Kong et al.8 found that deep events (at depths of \(>\) 300 km) in the northern and southern Mariana arc are potentially affected by a horizontally propagating tear (within a depth range of 300–400 km) that is parallel to the trench. Researchers have proposed that the heterogeneous concave slab is key to an increase in intraslab compression12, causing extensional brittle failure13 and resulting in various pathways for seawater to hydrate the subducted crust14. Slab dehydration thereby contributes to mantle melting and arc magmatism15, which also controls energy and fluid budgets for subduction output16,17,18.
Recent studies have shown that along-trench variations in the relative subduction velocity could affect the slab thermal state by altering the effective convergence rate of the underlying oceanic plate toward the overriding plate27,28. Current global tectonic motions (MORVEL24,25) indicate that the old Pacific seafloor is subducting obliquely (northwestward) into the Mariana margin (Figs. 1 and 2). However, the effects of oblique subduction on such a concave slab thermal structure are complex, and the temperature variation along the megathrust remains enigmatic. Therefore, combined with previous research in seismogenic subduction zones, including southwestern and central Japan, Cascadia, Hikurangi, Chile, Sumatra, Alaska, and Izu‒Bonin29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, we focus on the Mariana and attempt to account for plate motion factors in thermal modeling to evaluate the thermal state of this specific subduction channel underlain by a cold and old oceanic lithosphere and shed more light on the concave subduction system, which remains poorly understood in terms of the relationship between slab metamorphism and seismotectonics regarding oblique and steep subduction.
Methods and models
Previous thermal models developed from code Stag3D and using the finite difference method (FDM)39 have been successfully applied to circum-Pacific subduction zones involving northeastern Japan, Cascadia, Hikurangi, and north–central Chile28,29,30,31,34,35. To continue this study, we perform 3-D, time-evolving thermomechanical modeling for the Mariana, which has dimensions of 1350 × 750 × 400 km (along-strike length × cross-arc width × depth) and 80 × 80 × 100 grids, and we simulate the subduction of the Pacific Plate with varying seafloor ages (Fig. 3). We adopt a model involving a kinematic slab (geometrically prescribed and temporally evolving in length and thickness) and the dynamic domains for the mantle, overriding crust and accretionary prism. The subduction velocities inside a prescribed 3-D constrained volume of the oceanic lithosphere are given at each timestep according to the increase in the slab length, and we set the subduction time to at least 20 Myr to ensure that the model reaches a steady thermal state, with a temperature variation of < 10℃ over time and a lapse time of \(\ge\) 5 Myr. Hence, our model differs from a fully dynamic model in which the subducted plate evolves freely. The topography of the incoming plate adopts the Slab2 global data20 extrapolated by the surface function of the Generic Mapping Tools for the deep portions of the slab. The oceanic lithosphere has an initial thickness based on spatially distributed seafloor ages provided by EarthByte40. The trenchward temperature boundary is assumed according to the plate cooling model41 and the plate ages from EarthByte40.
Surface heat flow observations, including the global heat flow database42 and heat flow from the Curie point depth estimates43, are employed in this study to further constrain the thermal modeling (Fig. S1). The observed surface heat flow averages < 60 mW/m2 in the Mariana forearc basin, which has no accretionary complex but does have an outer-rise high, indicating probable low-density serpentinized mantle lithosphere beneath the outer forearc44. Similar to previous thermal models applied to northeastern and SW Japan, Hikurangi, Cascadia, and Chile28,29,30,31,32,33, the subduction velocities are obtained from the MORVEL 25-plate calculator for relative motion angular velocities24,25 and extrapolated into the subducted slab (Fig. 4a). The grid cells on the subducted Pacific Plate are prescribed with various motion rates and directions with regard to the Philippine Sea Plate, constituting the kinematic slab domain. The model boundaries and bottom are assumed to be adiabatic and permeable, except that the top boundary is set as rigid and has a temperature of 0 °C. The viscosity for wet olivine follows those from Hirth and Kohlstedt45 and Burkett and Billen46 for the upper mantle. The composite model settings, including the model configuration, initial and boundary conditions, and physical parameters, are illustrated in the Supplemental Information (SI). Based on these mature model settings, the 3-D thermal state and the phase transition of subducted rocks in the structured tectonic complex in the Marianas become calculable, and the thermal structural features caused by this rare high curvature and steep dip can be further estimated.
3-D subduction velocity field and thermal regime
The unstable megathrust is characterized by northwestward strike-slip motion in the northern part and southwestward strike-slip motion in the southernmost part. The oldest age of the incoming Pacific plate is Late Jurassic (> 145 Ma), and the plate is therefore colder than those in most of the other circum-Pacific subduction zones (Fig. 4b). The combination of plate motions, concave morphology, and varying dip angles and slab ages results in a comparatively unique subduction thermal structure that presently enables predictions from a 3D perspective, as Figs. 4 and 5 show. Although the along-strike seafloor ages do not differ much (140–150 Ma), the plate subduction velocity increases from 2 cm/yr for the southern seafloor (Challenger Deep), with an age of 148 Ma, to 2.4 cm/yr at 18°N (Pagan), with an age of 150 Ma, and then to 2.9 cm/yr in the northern Mariana close to Farallon de Pajaros Island, with an age of 147 Ma (Fig. 4a). We note that the largest dip angle is present in the Challenger Deep, where there is right-lateral strike-slip motion, i.e., westward oblique subduction. Straight subduction occurs along the profile in the northern Guam area, with a subduction velocity of 2 cm/yr. Nevertheless, the fastest relative plate motion is in the northernmost portion of the Mariana arc, with a velocity range of 2.9–3.0 cm/yr.
The complex concave subduction system leads to a comparatively complicated thermal regime, as exhibited in Fig. 4b. The calculated thermal regime clearly exhibits a thrust zone that transitions from 300 to 500 °C between the volcanic arc and trench. The coldest mantle wedge in the Marianas is predicted to be located to the east of Anatahan Island in the central Mariana (16–18° N, 146° E, blue circle in Fig. 4b), where the temperature is estimated to be less than 300 °C at approximately 30 km. In the northern Marianas (> 18° N), the Moho interface temperature increases to 400–500 °C along the strike. In the southern counterpart portion, the slab dip becomes larger, and the Moho interface temperature increases to 500 °C, which may be attributed to the decrease in the subduction velocity from 2.4 to 2 cm/yr. At a depth of > 80 km below the Marianas, the slab temperature rapidly increases to more than 700 °C, which is attributable to the stress and yield from slab bending48 and the transition to a large dip at this depth. The subvolcanic interface temperature is more than 1000 °C on average. The average P–T conditions for the subduction interface are shown in Fig. 5 (red curve), characterized by a slowdown in the temperature increase at a depth range of 40–60 km, thereby delineating a boundary between the cold shallow and warm deep slab portions.
Furthermore, we consider the P–T conditions at the epicenters of megathrust seismic events beneath the Marianas from 2000 to 201023 and correlate them to the P–T conditions of the subducted mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) rocks at the same depth (Fig. 5). The red circles represent earthquakes in the northern Marianas, and the blue circles represent earthquakes in the southern Marianas. We find that the southern events are preferentially distributed on the shallow plate interface (< 60 km), with a pressure of < 2 GPa and a temperature of < 700 °C. These results can also be explained by the slab dehydration rate of the Marianas, which is larger in the south than in the north (Fig. 4d).
Water content and slab dehydration
Estimates of the water content distribution in the Pacific Plate beneath the Marianas are shown in Fig. 4c based on the phase diagram for mid-ocean ridge basalts49,50. Lawsonite blueschist with a water content of 5.4 wt% transforms to lawsonite–amphibole eclogite (3 wt%), greenschist (3 wt%), or amphibolite (1.5–2.5 wt%) at temperatures of approximately 300–500 °C, followed by eclogite (0 wt%) at temperatures of approximately 650–700 °C (Fig. 5). Between 15 and 20°N, amphibolitization occurs mainly ca. 500 °C (depth of 60 km), which is attributable to the presence of a cold mantle wedge and a moderate dip angle at depth (Fig. 4c). In the southern Marianas along the megathrust, amphibolitization is associated with lower temperatures than in the northern Marianas because of a high dip angle, which accelerates the rock phase transition to amphibolite at approximately 400–500 °C and 1.5 GPa. Eclogitization requires comparatively stable transition temperatures of 650–700 °C; thus, the eclogitization front does not change much along the strike (Fig. 4c).
The dehydration belt on the plate interface beneath the Marianas extends from north to south and is aligned offshore from the Marianas Islands, with widths of 80 km (> 20° N), 50 km (16°–20° N), and 100 km (< 16° N) (Fig. 4d). The broader width of the dehydration front in the south is attributed to comparatively flat subduction adjacent to Guam (12°–14° N). Note that the mantle wedge in the southern Marianas between 12 and 14°N obviously accommodates more regular seismicity than that in other portions, partly due to high slab dehydration accompanied by straight subduction. The mantle wedge tends to be a tectonically active region sandwiched between the rigid overriding crust and a high-density, high-pressure viscous upper mantle. Upwelling fluids and melts are prone to be retained at the corner and serpentinize dry forearc crustal rocks51. The coldest mantle wedge close to the Anatahan–Pagan Islands (16–18°N) has a thinner dehydration region and is thus less seismically active. The Moho discontinuity at the plate interface in the vicinity of Anatahan is approximately 50 km east of the dehydration front, possibly resulting in fewer earthquakes between 16 and 18° N. In the northern Marianas, this interpretation is complicated because slab MORB dehydration facilitates the occurrence of only shallow interplate earthquakes, while deep subvolcanic earthquakes at depths of > 100 km are supposedly affected by other factors, such as the harzburgitization front in the lower layer of the incoming plate, similar to the situation for deep seismicity in the southern Marianas.
Subduction regime, surface expression, and arc magmatism
The Mariana volcanic arc ranges from 13 to 20° N above the plate interface, where temperatures are greater than 700 °C, possibly indicating that the dominant control is from the interior oceanic lithosphere, including harzburgitization and the stress and yield from bending48. Arc volcanoes located above the cold mantle wedge of the central Mariana arc (Pagan and Agrigan) are associated with interplate temperatures that are 100–200 °C lower between 18 and 19° N, which are immediately downdip othe coldest mantle wedge at 16–18° N and undergo remarkable left-lateral strike-slip (Fig. 4b).
The southern Mariana arc-trench system is rapidly deforming, resulting in unusual interactions between arc and back-arc basin magmatic systems15. The back-arc hydrothermal vents that are distributed along the Mariana Trough to the west of the Mariana Island arc47,52,53 are possibly the surface expressions of active fluid flows associated with age-progressive arc magmatism54; however, the details remain unclear, which is geographically consistent with the slab edge at a depth of ca. 300 km at the subduction interface (Fig. 4a,b).
The deep southern Mariana Trench (< 18° N) provides additional topographic evidence to potentially infer the straight subduction in the southern Marianas contributing to the stress accumulation and formation of the deepest trench on Earth (maximum of 10,920 m in the Challenger Deep). In the northern Marianas, the trench is shallower than 8000 m on average, differing from the southern Marianas (Fig. 4a,b). The plate dip downdip of the Challenger Deep is small at a depth < 30 km (Moho depth) (Fig. 4b) along the southern Mariana strike and becomes steep subduction at the Moho depth (Fig. 4b) due to slab bending. Similar slab bending at various slab segments is observed in the central and northern Marianas and occurs at average depths of 60–80 km. Hence, the temperature states at deep and shallow interfaces differ significantly, and the resultant slab is likely hotter at depth than previously considered.
Our calculation indicates that the subduction thermal regime in the Marianas is cold in shallow portions (< 50 km) and similar to the southern Izu‒Bonin arc and northeast Japan. In such a cold system, especially in shallow megathrusts, high-pressure metamorphic rocks are difficult to find. Our results suggest that at depths of < 40 km, slab metamorphism does not occur easily (Fig. 4c). However, the plunging down of the slab starts at a depth of 50 km, which likely composes a barrier for cold slab interiors to be directly transported to depth via the slab-bending region. Increased compress/tension stress leads to slab weakening and fractures in the bending portions, and brittle–viscously damaged slabs show a tendency for detachment at elevated mantle temperatures55. Hence, the weakened slab surface due to bending is a candidate to interpret the formation of high P–T conditions and deep slab metamorphism at depths of > 50 km below the Marianas (Fig. 4c), as evidenced by the forearc metamorphosed basalts and serpentine exhumation56 and the high-temperature metamorphic rocks (ca. 1.6 GPa, 50 km, and 590 °C) of the blueschist clasts in the Mariana, which indicate that the thermal regime was warmer than typical oceanic subduction57. Combined with the U–Pb rutile and zircon geochronology, the P–T data suggest that the blueschist clasts record initially warm conditions during the early initiation of Pacific plate subduction58,59,60. During the early stages of subduction, conditions are generally warmer, as the plate subducts at a shallower angle, and the ‘dragging down’ of geotherms at the base of the overlying mantle wedge has not yet been significantly achieved61. This is in line with warm P–T estimates from newly initiated subduction zones that have also been recorded by high-pressure mafic rocks60. In addition, seismic tomography showed that the subducting Pacific plate below the Marianas is characterized by low attenuation at depths greater than 100 km, but high attenuation is found in the plate between depths of 50 and 100 km due to hydration and/or melting62. A moderate to high subduction temperature for the deep subducted plate and slab residuals at depths of > 50 km below the Marianas is supported by geological, geophysical, and geodynamic evidence.
Comparison with previous thermal modeling results and exhumed rocks
A comprehensive comparison between the thermal models and exhumed rock P–T conditions has been performed (Fig. 6). First, globally observed exhumed rocks provide a reference for P–T subduction conditions63,64. The other rock or clast samples include the studies from Maekawa et al.65, Hacker et al.50, Tamblyn et al.57, Li et al.66, Ichiyama et al.67 and so on. Among them, Tamblyn et al.57 suggested much warmer P–T conditions for the Marianas according to rock/clast records but still within the P–T range benchmarks from Penninston-Dorland et al.63 and Brown and Johnson64 (gray arrow in Fig. 6). All of these studies involving petrological evidence indicated warm subduction P–T conditions with an interface temperature of > 200 °C at a depth of 30 km, which is consistent at different depths with this study (cold megathrusts) and our previous study for Cascadia (warm megathrusts).
Second, considering the criteria of whether the interplate temperature exceeds 200 °C at a depth of 30 km (1 GPa, Moho depth), previous thermal models can be separated into two groups, i.e., cold-type (< 200 °C) models9,17,68,70 and decoupling models in Sycrause et al.10 and warm-type (> 200 °C) models31,61,71. Since cold-type models usually incorporate the slab–mantle decoupling layer into modeling and prescribe a maximum decoupling depth, the calculation is generally colder than the warm-type models by 100–300 °C at depths of 30–60 km (1–2 GPa). However, at a depth of 90 km (3 GPa), interplate temperatures of the two groups are calculated in a similar range (500–800 °C) at subvolcanic depths, with their upper limits constrained by the mantle melting solidus.
Third, compared with the globally exhumed rock records, Penninston-Dorland et al.63 found that the model results in van Keken et al.17 are colder by 200–300 °C than those shown by rock evidence. In contrast, our plate-coupling models for the Mariana (red thick curve) and the cold-type models, including Gerya et al.61, obtained a slab temperature that is hotter than that of the plate-decoupling warm-type models by ca. 200 °C, which is seemingly more consistent with the observed exhumed rocks, as suggested by Penninston-Dorland et al.63 and Brown and Johnson64.
In addition, we performed a detailed comparison between our result and that in Wada and Wang51, in which the cross-section temperature variation along the profile crossing Pagan volcano was presented (Fig. S2). They suggested that the slab depth beneath Pagan volcano is approximately 110 km, which is determined by global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination72,73. However, we found that slab geometry data obtained from Slab220 are slightly different below Pagan volcano (Fig. S2). In addition, the plate decoupling hypothesis leads to a forearc interplate temperature as low as < 400 °C and an abrupt increase from 400 to 1000 °C beneath the arc, but our results show a progressive temperature elevation on the upper slab surface.
3-D slab dehydration, thermal gradient, and subduction earthquakes
The seismic events detected on the Mariana megathrust are more clustered in the southern Marianas, especially in the subarc and forearc regions south of 15° N (Fig. 4d), than those north of 15° N and in the northern Marianas. This contrast may be controlled by slab dehydration embrittlement, as determined by the subduction angle and pore overpressurization74,75 and possibly by the subsequent fault strength changes due to slab morphologic variability, as well as fluid channelization in the forearc mantle corner76,77. In general, similar to the situations in other subduction zones, the oldest subducted oceanic seafloor produces interface earthquakes under the control of the hydrothermal state of the incoming plate. Amphibolitization, eclogitization, and possible harzburgitization fronts involve the majority of subduction earthquakes in the Marianas, including deep seismic events.
Slab dehydration > 0.02 wt%/km east of the Mariana Islands indicates slab dewatering and fluid release from the subduction interface (Fig. 4d), which is more conspicuous in width on the plate interface than the counterparts in the central and northern Mariana, partially due to a rapidly descending old and cold oceanic plate with a large dip angle beneath the southern Marianas. The interplate geotherms from 300 to 700 °C in the southern Marianas also feature a slower thermal transition along the megathrust compared with those in the central and northern Marianas (Fig. 4d) over a distance of approximately 200 km updip of the interface portion beneath Guam and adjacent islands, where interplate earthquakes are more frequently observed compared with the other portions at the interface beneath the Marianas (Fig. 4d). Therefore, slab dehydration is considered to be one of the important factors influencing the generation of interface earthquakes beneath the Marianas.
The frequent seismicity located in the southern Marianas (12–14° N) corresponds to a temperature gradient inside the slab higher than 10 °C/km, as shown by the temperature gradient result (Fig. S3). Zheng and Chen78 also suggested that the dehydration of amphibole generally occurs at a high thermal gradient of > 11 °C/km. The molybdenum isotopes in the Marianas indicate that the serpentinization of the forearc mantle may result from shallow slab dehydration at < 80 km and is further fluxed by fluid/melt at depths > 80 km, as influenced by the subducting slab dragging down the serpentinized forearc mantle66. The cold subduction plate of the Marianas mostly dehydrates and releases abundant fluids beneath the forearc at depths of 70–80 km79. Our model supports the idea that the outflux peaks at approximately 70 km due to slab dehydration of amphibolitization to eclogitization at the front (Fig. 4d) and the largest interplate temperature gradient at this depth (Fig. S3). The magnitudes of earthquakes occurring at depth are influenced by the presence of a high temperature gradient and high pore fluid pressures. Released fluids lead to pore fluid pressure increases and facilitate the occurrence of intermediate–small earthquakes80.
Slab dehydration and water flux estimate
The increases in the plate deflection and flexural bending from the northern to southern Marianas and the water flux in the south have been calculated to be 15% greater than those in the northern and central Marianas48, which is consistent with our result that slab dehydration and temperature gradients are enhanced in the southern Marianas due to straight subduction and megathrust segmentation and heterogeneity (Figs. 4d and S3).
Shallow slab dewatering is evidenced by fluid expulsion in accretionary prisms and active serpentinite seamounts in the Mariana forearc81. Most variations in composition among primitive basalts from the Mariana Trough can be explained by melting mixtures of ultramafic mantle sources and water-rich components82. At Anatahan–Pagan (16–18° N), the seismic images of the Mariana Trench show that the low-velocity zone within the subducted slab mantle at a depth of approximately 40 km preserves the original thickness but exhibits a smaller reduction in velocity (approximately 4.1 km s−1); thus, the additional velocity reduction (approximately 0.3 km s−1) with respect to the surrounding upper mantle can be attributed to pore water in cracks18. The subducted slab at depths from 40 to 60 km has a reduced S-wave velocity due to slab serpentinization from the interface where the fluids obtained probably originate from deeper slab dehydration. The dehydration depths (40–60 km) are consistent with our dehydration distribution at Anatahan–Pagan (Fig. 4d). Cai et al.18 further interpret seismic images as strong evidence for a (24 ± 5)-km-thick, partially serpentinized (2 wt% water) slab mantle layer and estimate the water flux for the Marianas to be 79 ± 17 TgMyr−1 m−1, which is 4.3 ± 0.8 times larger than a previous estimate16,17 that assumed a 2-km-thick, partially serpentinized slab mantle (2 wt% water). Our estimate of the water flux for the Marianas is based on the thickness of the slab mantle layer (30–100 km), its partial serpentinization (2 wt% water or more), and the subduction velocity varying along strike (2–3.5 cm/yr) of approximately 50–300 TgMyr−1 m−1 (the weight of water input after each meter of subduction and each million-year period); this estimate is largely dependent on the plate geometry and has a magnitude similar to that of the water flux estimate that was obtained18 at Anatahan–Pagan (16–18° N), which has a cold mantle wedge within the Mariana convergence zone.
Through 3-D thermomechanical modeling of the Mariana subduction megathrust, we draw the following conclusions:
The concave slab geometry associated with the complex plate tectonics in the Marianas features a thermal regime with a heterogeneous interface that changes along strike and the formation of a cold mantle wedge in the central Marianas.
The large dip and straight subduction of the Pacific plate in the southern Marianas are associated with a large temperature gradient and strong slab dehydration. Amphibolitization, eclogitization, and harzburgitization influence the occurrence of interface and intraslab earthquakes below the Marianas.
High slab dehydration (> 0.02 wt%/km) east of the Mariana Islands indicates enhanced fluid release and potential migration along the megathrusts that are comparable to the water flux estimate.
Data are available in the tables and figures of this study or from the authors upon request.
Stern, R. J., Reagan, M., Ishizuka, O., Ohara, Y. & Whattam, S. To understand subduction initiation, study forearc crust: To understand forearc crust, study ophiolites. Lithosphere 4(6), 469–483 (2012).
Stern, R. J. & Hargrove, U. S. The Anatahan Felsic Province in the mariana arc system. AGUFM 2003, V32B-1010 (2003).
Manea, V. C. et al. A review of the geodynamic evolution of flat slab subduction in Mexico, Peru, and Chile. Tectonophysics 695, 27–52 (2017).
Billen, M. I. Modeling the dynamics of subducting slabs. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 325–356 (2008).
Becker, T. W. & Faccenna, C. A review of the role of subduction dynamics for regional and global plate motions. In Subduction Zone Geodynamics pp. 3–34. (Springer, 2009).
Gvirtzman, Z. & Stern, R. J. Bathymetry of Mariana trench‐arc system and formation of the Challenger Deep as a consequence of weak plate coupling. Tectonics 36(2), TC2011 (2004).
Oakley, A. J., Taylor, B. & Moore, G. F. Pacific Plate subduction beneath the central Mariana and Izu‐Bonin fore arcs: New insights from an old margin. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9(6), Q06003 (2008).
Kong, X. et al. Causes of earthquake spatial distribution beneath the Izu-Bonin–Mariana Arc. J. Asian Earth Sci. 151, 90–100 (2018).
Wada, I., & Wang, K. Common depth of slab-mantle decoupling: Reconciling diversity and uniformity of subduction zones. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 10, Q10009 (2009).
Syracuse, E. M., van Keken, P. E. & Abers, G. A. The global range of subduction zone thermal models. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 183, 73–90 (2010).
Condit, C. B., Guevara, V. E., Delph, J. R. & French, M. E. Slab dehydration in warm subduction zones at depths of episodic slip and tremor. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 552, 116601 (2020).
Lallemand, S., Heuret, A. & Boutelier, D. On the relationships between slab dip, back‐arc stress, upper plate absolute motion, and crustal nature in subduction zones. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 6(9), Q09006 (2005)
Watts, A. B. Isostasy and Flexure of the Lithosphere (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Ranero, C. R., Phipps Morgan, J., McIntosh, K. & Reichert, C. Bending-related faulting and mantle serpentinization at the Middle America trench. Nature 425, 367–373 (2003).
Stern, R. J. et al. How the Mariana Volcanic Arc ends in the south. Island Arc 22(1), 133–148 (2013).
van Keken, P. E. The structure and dynamics of the mantle wedge. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 215(3–4), 323–338 (2003).
van Keken, P. E., Hacker, B. R., Syracuse, E. M. & Abers, G. A. Subduction factory: 4. Depth‐dependent flux of H2O from subducting slabs worldwide. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 116(B1), B01401 (2011).
Cai, C., Wiens, D. A., Shen, W. & Eimer, M. Water input into the Mariana subduction zone estimated from ocean-bottom seismic data. Nature 563(7731), 389–392 (2018).
Smith, W. H. F. & Sandwell, D. T. Global seafloor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science 277, 1957–1962 (1997).
Hayes, G. P. et al. Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model. Science 362(6410), 58–61 (2018).
Siebert, L., Simkin, T. & Kimberly, P. Volcanoes of the World 3rd edn, 568 (University of California Press, 2010).
Bird, P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 4(3), 1027 (2003).
Trabant, C. et al. Data products at the IRIS DMC: Stepping stones for research and other applications. Seismol. Res. Lett. 83(5), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120032 (2012).
DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G. & Argus, D. F. Geologically current plate motions. Geophys. J. Int. 181(1), 1–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04491.x (2010).
DeMets, C. & Dixon, T. H. New kinematic models for Pacific-North America motion from 3 Ma to present, I: Evidence for steady motion and biases in the NUVEL-1A model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26(13), 1921–1924 (1999).
Wessel, P. & Smith, W. H. F. New improved version of the generic mapping tools released. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 79, 579 (1998).
Yabe, S., Ide, S. & Yoshioka, S. Along-strike variations in temperature and tectonic tremor activity along the Hikurangi subduction zone, New Zealand. Earth Planets Space 66(1), 1–15 (2014).
Ji, Y., Yoshioka, S. & Matsumoto, T. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of temperature and mantle flow fields associated with subduction of the Philippine Sea Plate, southwest japan. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121(6), 4458–4482. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012912 (2016).
Ji, Y., Yoshioka, S. & Banay, Y. A. Thermal state, slab metamorphism and interface seismicity in the Cascadia subduction zone based on 3-D modeling: 3-D thermomechanical model for Cascadia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 9242–9252. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074826 (2017).
Ji, Y., Yoshioka, S., Manea, V. & Manea, M. Seismogenesis of dual subduction beneath Kanto, central Japan controlled by fluid release. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 16864. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16818-z (2017).
Ji, Y., Yoshioka, S., Manea, V. C., Manea, M. & Matsumoto, T. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of thermal regime and slab dehydration beneath Kanto and Tohoku, Japan. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122, 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013230 (2017).
Ji, Y., Yoshioka, S., Manea, V., Manea, M. & Suenaga, N. Three-dimensional thermal structure, metamorphism and seismicity beneath north-central Chile. J. Geodyn. 129, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2018.09.004 (2019).
Ji, Y. et al. Slab dehydration in Sumatra: Implications for fast and slow earthquakes and arc magmatism. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL090576 (2021).
Ji, Y. & Yoshioka, S. Slab dehydration and earthquake distribution beneath southwestern and central Japan based on three-dimensional thermal modeling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 2679–2686. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072295 (2017).
Suenaga, N., Ji, Y., Yoshioka, S. & Feng, D. Subduction thermal regime, slab dehydration, and seismicity distribution beneath Hikurangi based on 3D simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015382 (2018).
Suenaga, N., Yoshioka, S. & Ji, Y. 3-D thermal regime and dehydration processes around the regions of slow earthquakes along the Ryukyu Trench. Sci. Rep. 11, 11251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90199-2 (2021).
Qu, R., Ji, Y. & Zhu, W. Variations in wedge earthquake distribution along the strike underlain by thermally controlled hydrated megathrusts. Appl. Sci.-Basel 11, 7268. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167268 (2021).
Qu, R., Ji, Y., Zhu, W., Zhao, Y. & Zhu, Y. Fast and slow earthquakes in Alaska: Implications from a three-dimensional thermal regime and slab metamorphism. Appl. Sci.-Basel 12, 11139 (2022).
Tackley, P. J. & Xie, S. Stag3D: A code for modeling thermochemical multiphase convection in Earth’s mantle, computational fluid and solid mechanics 2003, (ed. K. J. Bathe), 1524–1527 (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2003).
Müller, R. D., Sdrolias, M., Gaina, C. & Roest, W. R. Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world’s ocean crust. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9(4), Q04006. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001743 (2008).
Grose, C. J. & Afonso, J. C. Comprehensive plate models for the thermal evolution of oceanic lithosphere. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 3751–3778. https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20232 (2013).
Pollack, H. N., Hurter, S. J. & Johnson, J. R. Heat flow from the earth’s interior: Analysis of the global data set. Rev. Geophys. 31(3), 267–280 (1993).
Li, C., Lu, Y. & Wang, J. A global reference model of curie-point depths based on EMAG2. Sci. Rep. 7, 45129. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45129 (2017).
Stern, R. & Smoot, N. C. A bathymetric overview of the Mariana forearc. Island Arc 7(3), 525–540 (1998).
Hirth, G. & Kohlstedt, D. Rheology of the upper mantle and the mantle wedge: A view from the experimentalists, in Inside the Subduction Factory, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 138, edited by J. Eiler, 83 – 105, (AGU, 2003).
Burkett, E. R. & Billen, M. I. Three-dimensionality of slab detachment due to ridge-trench collision: Laterally simultaneous boudinage versus tear propagation. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 11, Q11012. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003286 (2010).
Anderson, M. et al. Geological interpretation of volcanism and segmentation of the Mariana back-arc spreading center between 12.7°N and 18.3°N. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 2240–2274 (2017).
Zhang, J., Zhang, F., Lin, J. & Yang, H. Yield failure of the subducting plate at the Mariana Trench. Tectonophysics 814, 228944 (2021).
Omori, S., Kita, S., Maruyama, S. & Santosh, M. Pressure–temperature conditions of ongoing regional metamorphism beneath the Japanese Islands. Gondwana Res. 16, 458–469 (2009).
Hacker, B. R., Abers, G. A. & Peacock, S. M. Subduction factory 1. Theoretical mineralogy, densities, seismic wave speeds, and H2O contents. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB001127 (2003).
Wada, I., Wang, K., He, J. & Hyndman, R. D. Weakening of the subduction interface and its effects on surface heat flow, slab dehydration, and mantle wedge serpentinization. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005190 (2008).
Ohara, Y. et al. A serpentinite-hosted ecosystem in the Southern Mariana Forearc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(8), 2831–2835 (2012).
Boulegue, J., Benedetti, E. L., Dron, D., Mariotti, A. & Letolle, R. Geochemical and biogeochemical observations on the biological communities associated with fluid venting in Nankai Trough and Japan Trench subduction zones. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 83(1–4), 343–355 (1987).
Homrighausen, S. et al. Paired EMI-HIMU hotspots in the South Atlantic—Starting plume heads trigger compositionally distinct secondary plumes?. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba0282 (2020).
Gerya, T. V., Bercovici, D. & Becker, T. W. Dynamic slab segmentation due to brittle–ductile damage in the outer rise. Nature 599(7884), 245–250 (2021).
Ocean Drilling Program, Peters, L. L., Richter, C. & Salisbury, M. H. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program: Covering Leg 195 of the Cruises of the Drilling Vessel JOIDES Resolution, Apra Harbor, Guam, to Keelung Taiwan, Sites 1200 and 1202, 2 March-2 May 2001. Initial Reports. Seafloor Observatories and the Kuroshio Current. Texas A & M University. 1–63 (College Station, TX, 2002).
Tamblyn, R. et al. Blueschist from the Mariana forearc records long-lived residence of material in the subduction channel. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 519, 171–181 (2019).
Ishizuka, O. et al. The timescales of subduction initiation and subsequent evolution of an oceanic island arc. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 306, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.006 (2011).
Ishizuka, O. et al. Age of Izu-BoninMariana arc basement. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 481, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.023 (2018).
Agard, P. et al. Plate interface rheological switches during subduction infancy: Control on slab penetration and metamorphic sole formation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 451, 208–220 (2016).
Gerya, T. V., Stöckhert, B. & Perchuk, A. L. Exhumation of high-pressure metamorphic rocks in a subduction channel: A numerical simulation. Tectonics 21, 6-1–6-19 (2002).
Pozgay, S. H., Wiens, D. A., Conder, J. A., Shiobara, H. & Sugioka, H. Seismic attenuation tomography of the Mariana subduction system: Implications for thermal structure, volatile distribution, and slow spreading dynamics. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 10(4), Q04X05 (2009).
Penniston-Dorland, S. C., Kohn, M. J. & Manning, C. E. The global range of subduction zone thermal structures from exhumed blueschists and eclogites: Rocks are hotter than models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 428, 243–254 (2015).
Brown, M. & Johnson, T. Secular change in metamorphism and the onset of global plate tectonics. Am. Miner. 103, 181–196 (2018).
Maekawa, H., Shozui, M., Ishii, T., Fryer, P. & Pearce, J. A. Blueschist metamorphism in an active subduction zone. Nature 364, 520–523 (1993).
Li, H.-Y. et al. Molybdenum isotopes unmask slab dehydration and melting beneath the Mariana arc. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–10 (2021).
Ichiyama, Y. et al. Temporal and spatial mineralogical changes in clasts from Mariana serpentinite mud volcanoes: Cooling of the hot forearc-mantle at subduction initiation. Lithos 384, 105941 (2021).
Hebert, L. B., Antoshechkina, P., Asimow, P. & Gurnis, M. Emergence of a low-viscosity channel in subduction zones through the coupling of mantle flow and thermodynamics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 278(3–4), 243–256 (2009).
van Keken, P. E., Kiefer, B. & Peacock, S. M. High-resolution models of subduction zones: Implications for mineral dehydration reactions and the transport of water into the deep mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 3, 1 (2002).
Abers, G. A., van Keken, P. E. & Wilson, C. R. Deep decoupling in subduction zones: Observations and temperature limits. Geosphere 16, 1408–1424 (2020).
Ruh, J. B., Le Pourhiet, L., Agard, P., Burov, E. & Gerya, T. Tectonic slicing of subducting oceanic crust along plate interfaces: Numerical modeling. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 16, 3505–3531 (2015).
Engdahl, E. R., van der Hilst, R. & Buland, R. Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, 722–743 (1998).
England, P., Engdahl, R. & Thatcher, W. Systematic variation in the depths of slabs beneath arc volcanoes. Geophys. J. Int. 156, 377–408 (2004).
Peacock, S. M., Christensen, N. I., Bostock, M. G. & Audet, P. High pore pressures and porosity at 35 km depth in the Mariana subduction zone. Geology https://doi.org/10.1130/G31649.1 (2011).
Liu, Y. Numerical simulations on megathrust rupture stabilized under strong dilatancy strengthening in slow slip region. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1311–1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50298 (2013).
Hyndman, R. D., McCrory, P. A., Wech, A., Kao, H. & Ague, J. Mariana subductingplate fluids channelled to fore-arc mantle corner: ETS and silica deposition. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 4344–4358. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB011920.2015 (2015).
Plümper, O., John, T., Podladchikov, Y. Y., Vrijmoed, J. C. & Scambelluri, M. Fluid escape from subduction zones controlled by channel-forming reactive porosity. Nat. Geosci. 10, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2865 (2017).
Zheng, Y. F. & Chen, Y. X. Continental versus oceanic subduction zones. Natl. Sci. Rev. 3, 495–519 (2016).
Ribeiro, J. M. et al. Composition of the slab-derived fluids released beneath the Mariana forearc: Evidence for shallow dehydration of the subducting plate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 418, 136–148 (2015).
Emry, E. L., Wiens, D. A., Shiobara, H. & Sugioka, H. Seismogenic characteristics of the Northern Mariana shallow thrust zone from local array data. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12, Q12008 (2011).
Savov, I. P., Ryan, J. G., D’Antonio, M. & Fryer, P. Shallow slab fluid release across and along the Mariana arc‐basin system: Insights from geochemistry of serpentinized peridotites from the Mariana fore arc. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 112(B9), B09205 (2007).
Stolper, E. & Newman, S. The role of water in the petrogenesis of Mariana trough magmas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 121(3–4), 293–325 (1994).
We thank P. Tackley for sharing the Stag3D code developed in this study. We appreciate the earthquake catalog from the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS). The figures were created with Generic Mapping Tools, including the coasts and borders (Wessel and Smith, 1998), and Paraview software developed by Kitware, Inc. This study benefited from financial support from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Pioneer Hundred Talents Program and the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0708).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Qu, R., Zhu, W., Ji, Y. et al. Subduction thermal regime, petrological metamorphism and seismicity under the Mariana arc. Sci Rep 13, 1948 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29004-1