Abstract
Opsins, light-sensitive G protein-coupled receptors, have been identified in corals but their properties are largely unknown. Here, we identified six opsin genes (acropsins 1–6) from a coral species Acropora millepora, including three novel opsins (acropsins 4–6), and successfully characterized the properties of four out of the six acropsins. Acropsins 1 and 6 exhibited light-dependent cAMP increases in cultured cells, suggesting that the acropsins could light-dependently activate Gs-type G protein like the box jellyfish opsin from the same opsin group. Spectral sensitivity curves having the maximum sensitivities at ~ 472 nm and ~ 476 nm were estimated for acropsins 1 and 6, respectively, based on the light wavelength-dependent cAMP increases in these opsins-expressing cells (heterologous action spectroscopy). Acropsin 2 belonging to the same group as acropsins 1 and 6 did not induce light-dependent cAMP or Ca2+ changes. We then successfully estimated the acropsin 2 spectral sensitivity curve having its maximum value at ~ 471 nm with its chimera mutant which possessed the third cytoplasmic loop of the Gs-coupled jellyfish opsin. Acropsin 4 categorized as another group light-dependently induced intracellular Ca2+ increases but not cAMP changes. Our results uncovered that the Acropora coral possesses multiple opsins coupling two distinct cascades, cyclic nucleotide and Ca2+signaling light-dependently.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Reef-building corals lack eyes and even basic visual structures, yet display notable light sensitivities, including tentacle expansion and retraction1 and regulation of reproductive timing2,3,4. Light also influences the behavior of planula larvae which in some species demonstrate phototaxis/photophobic responses5,6,7 and light-dependent selection of settlement substrata8,9,10. The molecular basis of these photoreceptions has been largely unknown.
Thousands of opsins, which are bound to retinal chromophores and form photosensitive pigments, have been identified from various triploblastic animals and they are classified into seven groups11,12. Our previous studies have shown that the opsin members belonging to different groups possess different molecular properties, some of which may relate to physiological functions for extraocular photoreception11,13,14. In both vertebrates and invertebrates, opsins responsible for extraocular photosensitivity versus ocular photosensitivity are associated with distinct molecular properties and signaling cascades. While coral photosensitivity is inherently non-ocular, multiple opsins with different molecular properties are likely responsible for these various coral photoreceptions.
Opsin genes have been identified in cnidarians including hydrozoans, scyphozoan, cubozoans and anthozoans15. Cubozoan opsins have been identified in two box jellyfish species, Tripedallia cystophora and Carybrea rastonii16,17. In corals, three kinds of opsin genes (acropsins 1–3) were identified from cDNA libraries from the species Acropora palmata18. Together with the genome- and transcriptome-based identification of opsin genes in sea anemones15,19, these efforts support the notion that opsins in anthozoans are expressed and have a potential to function.
In the phylogenetic tree of the opsin family, which is composed of several functionally different groups11, anthozoan opsins do not form a single cluster, but instead are classified into three distinct ones, suggesting their diversity in molecular properties19,20,21,22. To date, only box jellyfish opsins have been characterized with respect to spectral characteristics and G protein coupling17,23.
Here, we identified six putative opsin genes (acropsins 1–6) in an Indo-Pacific coral, Acropora millepora. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that they fall into the three known cnidarian opsin groups, including two anthozoan-specific opsin clades. We heterologously expressed the acropsins in mammalian cells to investigate their molecular properties. Our results demonstrate their sensitivity to blue or UV light and coupling to at least two distinct signaling cascades.
Results
Identification of opsins in Acropora millepora
We isolated six cDNAs encoding opsins, acropsins 1–6, from planula larvae of the Indo-Pacific coral, Acropora millepora. The deduced amino acid sequences of acropsins had typical features of opsins: seven putative transmembrane domains and the Lys residue for chromophore binding at the seventh transmembrane domain (Lys at position 296, the bovine rhodopsin numbering system). We inferred the phylogenetic tree of the opsin family including acropsins and found that three of the six acropsins in A. millepora were orthologs of previously reported A. palmata acropsins 1–318, and the other three (acropsins 4–6) were novel coral opsins (Fig. 1). The phylogenetic tree showed that these six genes did not form a single coral opsin clade and fell into three distinct groups corresponding to the previously reported cnidarian opsin clades. Acropsins 1, 2 and 6 fall in the group 1 (cnidarian Gs-coupled opsin group17 or “cnidopsin”24), acropsins 4 and 5 in the group 2 (“anthozoan-specific opsin II, ASO_II”15,21) and acropsin 3 in the group 3 (“anthozoan-specific opsin I, ASO_I”15,21).
Light-induced cAMP increase and spectral sensitivities
Our attempts to obtain absorption spectra of the detergent-solubilized pigments of the recombinant acropsins did not produce interpretable spectra. Therefore, we estimated spectral sensitivities of acropsins by heterologous action spectroscopy (HAS), which is based on light wavelength- and intensity-dependent cAMP increases of opsin-expressing cultured cells25,26. We first investigated cAMP change in the cultured cells expressing each of the six acropsins using a cAMP-sensitive luciferase assay. We found a prominent light-induced cAMP increases in the acropsins 1- and 6-expressing cells, suggesting that acropsins 1 and 6 light-dependently activated Gs-type G protein, which is similar to the box jellyfish opsin17. In contrast, cells expressing either of the other four opsins did not exhibit any cAMP changes (Fig. 2). We then conducted HAS for acropsins 1 and 6 to estimate their spectral sensitivities (Fig. 3). We calculated relative sensitivities of the acropsin-expressing cells at five wavelengths and fit the relative sensitivity data with the rhodopsin nomogram curve27 to estimate a spectral sensitivity curve. The residual sum of squares (RSS) was calculated as a function of λmax of nomogram curves, and the minimum value of residual sum of squares for each acropsin indicates the goodness of fit between the estimated sensitivity curve and sensitivities obtained in the experiments (Fig. 3D,F). The estimated spectral sensitivity curves indicated that acropsins 1 and 6 are blue-sensitive opsins with maximum sensitivities located at approximate 472 nm and 476 nm, respectively (Fig. 3A,C).
We next engineered chimeras for acropsins 2–5 of which wild types exhibited no cAMP changes, with the aim of enabling activation of Gs that leads to large cAMP elevation to estimate spectral sensitivities by HAS. We previously developed a method for investigating the spectral sensitivity of opsins which do not elevate cAMP, that is based on the creation of chimeric proteins with the native third cytoplasmic loop replaced with the third cytoplasmic loop of the Gs-coupled box jellyfish opsin and showed that the replacement of the third cytoplasmic loop did not affect the absorption spectrum of the native opsin25. Of the acropsin 2–5 chimeras, light-dependent cAMP increase was only observed for acropsin 2 (Fig. 2B–E). The spectral sensitivity curve of the acropsin 2 chimera obtained by the same methods as the cases of acropsins 1 and 6 exhibited the maximum sensitivity at 471 nm (Fig. 3B,E).
Light-evoked calcium increase in the acropsin-expressing cells
Most animal opsins drive cyclic nucleotide- and/or phosphoinositol and free Ca2+-mediated phototransduction cascades17. Since wild type acropsins 3, 4 and 5 or their chimeras did not exhibit any light-induced cAMP change under the experimental conditions (Fig. 2C–E), we next investigated whether the cultured cells expressing acropsins 3–5 exhibited increases of intracellular free calcium level (Fig. 4). When the cells were exposed to the UV light (340/380 nm) for excitation of Fura-2, we observed a transient increase in Fura-2 fluorescence in the cells expressing acropsin 4 but not in the cells expressing acropsins 3 or 5, although protein expression of acropsins 3 and 5 in cultured cells was observed by immunostaining (Supplementary Fig. S1). Likewise, we did not detect a clear increase of the fluorescence in the cells expressing acropsin 1, 2 or 6. Thus, only acropsin 4 elevated free Ca2+ in the cultured cells in a light-dependent manner.
Discussion
We isolated six opsin genes from the reef-building coral, Acropora millepora. The opsins, acropsins 1–6, were phylogenetically divided into 3 groups (Fig. 1). We characterized the some signaling and spectral properties of acropsins 1, 2 and 6 (group 1) and acropsin 4 (group 2). Interestingly, groups 1 and 2 contained the members that drove different signaling cascades leading to increase of cAMP and calcium, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2). On the other hand, we were unable to observe light-induced cAMP or calcium change for acropsin 3, which belongs to group 3 or acropsin 5 (group 2) although their proteins expression in the cultured cells was detected by immunostaining (Supplementary Fig. S1). The acropsin 3 orthologue in A. palmata was shown to light-dependently form a stable product with Gq inducing calcium elevation, by limited trypsinolysis of Gq18. This experimental method detecting the distinct biochemical event from the calcium increase and may show different sensitivity to the light-dependent events. Therefore, different methods might have led to the apparently inconsistent results. Further studies for acropsins 3 and 5 are necessary to understand molecular properties of group 2 and 3 opsins.
Acropsins 1, 2 and 6 in the group 1 all had maximum sensitivities in the blue light region. Blue lights are reportedly important for tentacle reaction of adult polyps1 and for larval light-responsive behavior7 in several scleractinian corals. Furthermore, the nocturnal illumination with blue/green lights has an impact on the spawning timing in A. millepora3. The blue-sensitive acropsins may be responsible for these photosensitivities.
Acropsins 1 and 6 mediated cAMP increase in a light-dependent manner, indicating that they couple to the Gs-type G protein. Together with previous observation that jellyfish opsins elevate cAMP, it is suggested that most opsins in group 1 couple to Gs. However, acropsin 2, which belongs to group 1 did not stimulate cAMP, only its chimeric form did (Fig. 2), suggesting that signaling within this group is not limited to the Gs pathway. Additional experiments will be needed to identify signaling cascades regulated by the members of the cnidarian opsin group 1.
We also showed that acropsin 4 can evoke light-dependent free calcium responses in the cultured cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe signaling of the group 2 opsin. In opsins investigated thus far, protostome visual opsins (Gq-coupled opsins) and deuterostome melanopsin (Opn 4) can elevate calcium level in cultured cells via Gq28,29. As acropsin 4 did not show obvious cAMP changes, our findings suggest that it may be the first example of a Gq-coupled opsin outside of the Gq-coupled invertebrate visual opsins and melanopsin group (Fig. 1), although interestingly, it was reported that human Opn5 activate Gq in heterologous cells30 whereas mouse and chicken Opn5s activate Gi in the cultured cell and in vitro systems31,32. It would also be the first Gq-coupled opsin in a basal metazoan as ancient as the cnidarians and may provide evidence that Gq-coupled opsins evolved in cnidarian and bilaterian lineages independently.
Calcium elevation in the cells expressing acropsin 4 was initiated by UV (340/380 nm) light that is necessary to excite Fura-2. Since UV light is essential for measuring the Ca2+read-out, we were unable to investigate the spectral sensitivity of acropsin 4. Interestingly, acropsins 4 and 5 (group 2) have no negatively charged amino acid at the counterion positions, namely sites 94, 113 and 18133,34,35,36,37,38,39. Because the counterion stabilizes protonation of the retinylidene Schiff base and is essential for the visible light absorption, these characteristics in the amino acid sequences suggest that acropsins 4 and 5 might be UV-sensitive opsins or have the counterion at a position(s) other than the three known positions.
Acropsin 4 belongs to the phylogenetically diverged opsin group from invertebrate Gq-coupled opsin and melanopsin group (Fig. 1) and has a different primary structure from those of the known Gq-coupled opsins. The fact suggests that acropsin 4 might have a unique molecular property as a novel opsin that evokes the intracellular calcium elevation. Optogenetics has made significant contributions to study various biological events involving GPCR40,41,42. Therefore, acropsin 4 might have a potential as a new optogenetic tool controlling free Ca2+ signaling, possibly via Gq and an effector enzyme, phospholipase Cβs (PLCβs).
Materials and methods
Sample collection
Larval samples of Acropora millepora (A. millepora) used for RNA isolation were raised in the laboratory from laboratory-crossed gametes. Individual colonies of A. millepora were temporarily removed from the inshore reef of Orpheus Island and maintained in flow-through seawater troughs at Orpheus Island Research Station (James Cook University). On the nights of the expected spawning, individual colonies were isolated to keep gametes from individuals separate and equal volumes of the gamete bundles from 5 to 8 colonies were combined to allow out-crossing among individuals. The resulting fertilized embryos were reared in a gentle flow-through seawater system—plankton kriesels (culture tanks with gentle circulation and aeration) and then larvae were collected and frozen for RNA isolation.
Cloning of opsins
Using A. palmata opsin sequences reported previously18 as queries, we searched for opsin sequences in in-house transcriptome data for A. millepora and found six opsin sequences. Based on the sequences, we obtained the full-length cDNAs of five opsins (acropsins 1, 2, 4–6) and the partial cDNA of acropsin 3 (which has the shortened C terminal tail relative to A. palmata acropsin 318) by RT-PCR. Briefly, total RNA was isolated, using a TRIzol (Invitrogen), from A. millepora planulae (~ 100 larvae). The cDNAs were synthesized from the total RNA by reverse transcription using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies) and were applied to PCR reaction as a template.
Phylogenetic tree inference
We first selected representative opsin sequences belonging to eight functional groups (i.e., vertebrate visual/non-visual opsin, Opn3, Go-coupled opsin, cnidarian Gs-coupled opsin (cnidopsin), Opn5, invertebrate Gq-coupled opsin/melanopsin, peropsin and RGR/retinochrome11) and xenopsin, which is a recently characterized subgroup of opsin22. To identify candidate opsin sequences of two anthozoan species (Nematostella vectensis and Acropora millepora), we carried out BLASTP search against the available genome database (NCBI RefSeq, accession numbers: GCA_000209225 for N. vectensis; GCA_013753865.1 for A. millepora) with an e-value cutoff of 1e-10 using the amino acid sequence of bovine rhodopsin (accession number: AH001149) as a query. We aligned the candidate sequences and removed sequences that lacked the conserved lysine residue homologous to Lys-296 of bovine rhodopsin. Candidate opsin sequences of Nematostella vectensis were compared with the previously published opsin data set19,20, and redundant duplicates and fragmented sequences were also removed. We added acropsin sequences (acropsin 1–6) cloned in this study, the putative opsin sequences of Nematostella vectensis and Acropora millepora and sequences of melatonin receptors, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and Placopsins to the representative opsin dataset. The final set of sequences was aligned using MAFFT version 7.243 and gaps in the aligned sequences were removed using trimAl version 1.244 with the ‘gappyout’ option. The maximum likelihood (ML) tree was reconstructed using RAxML-NG version 1.145 assuming the LG + G4 + FC model, which was selected based on AICc using ModelTest-NG version 0.2.046. ML branch supports were estimated with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Spectral sensitivity based on GloSensor assay
Heterologous action spectroscopy based on changes in the intracellular cAMP level of opsin-expressing HEK293S cells was performed using the GloSensor cAMP assay (Promega), as described previously25,26. Briefly, the opsin expression vectors were transfected into HEK293S with the pGloSensor-22F cAMP plasmid (Promega) using the polyethyleneimine (PEI) transfection method. The transfected cells were incubated overnight at 37°C and after supplementation of 11-cis retinal, cells were further incubated overnight at 37°C. Before measurements, the culture medium was replaced with a CO2-independent medium containing 10% FBS and GloSensor cAMP Reagent stock solution (Promega). Luminescence derived from GloSensor, an indicator of intracellular cAMP, was measured at 25°C using a GloMax 20/20n Luminometer (Promega). The cells were illuminated with light-emitting diode (LED) light for 5 s and the light-induced changes in luminescence were measured. The measured luminescence values were normalized to those just before the irradiations. LEDs with spectral emission peaks of 410, 430, 470, 510, and 540 nm arrayed on a board (SPL-25-CC; REVOX Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) were used as light sources for measurements of wavelength-dependent responses of opsin-expressing cultured cells. The quantum flux of each LED light was adjusted to 6.2 * 1014 or 2.2 * 1014 photons/cm2/s using interference filters (MZ0410, MZ0430, MZ0470, MZ0510 and MZ0540; Asahi Spectra Co., Ltd.), neutral-density (ND) filters (SIGMAKOKI Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan and Shibuya Optical Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan) and ground-glass (Shibuya Optical Co., Ltd.).
Dose (intensity)-response curves were generated for cultured cells expressing each of the opsins by irradiating cells with blue (470 nm) LED light (Ex-DHC; Bio Tools Inc. Gunma, Japan) at 5 different intensities, established using a series of neutral-density (ND) filters. It should be noted that individual dishes of cells were irradiated only once during the measurements, and at least three independent measurements were made at each wavelength or intensity. The intensity–response curve was obtained by fitting a sigmoid function (V = Vmax * In/(In + Kn), where V is the response amplitude, Vmax is maximum response amplitude, I is the stimulus light intensity, K is stimulus intensity eliciting 50% Vmax, and n is the exponent) to the mean responses at each intensity of light irradiation.
The amplitude of the wavelength-dependent responses was extrapolated to the intensity-response curve to transform the amplitude into photon numbers required for the responses. Absorption spectra were estimated by fitting a rhodopsin template27 to the relative sensitivities according to the least squares method with the aid of IGOR Pro software (WaveMetrics).
Calcium imaging assay
Calcium imaging assay was performed as described elsewhere29. Briefly, HEK293S cells were transfected with a plasmid DNA by PEI transfection method. Five hours after the transfection, retinal was added to the transfected cells, which were then incubated in Krebs–Ringer HEPES buffer containing 5 μM Fura 2-AM (Dojindo, Japan) next day of the transfection. Fura-2 fluorescence was measured using a fluorescence microscope (BX-51, Olympus) with a CMOS camera (ORCA-Flash4.0, HAMAMATSU) and MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices).
Accession numbers
Acropora millepora Acropsin 1, MK829324; Acropsin 2, MK829325; Acropsin 3, MK829326; Acropsin 4, MK829327; Acropsin 5, MK829328; Acropsin 6, MK829329.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Gorbunov, M. Y. & Falkowski, P. G. Photoreceptors in the cnidarian hosts allow symbiotic corals to sense blue moonlight. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 309–315 (2002).
Hayashibara, T., Iwao, K. & Omori, M. Induction and control of spawning in Okinawan staghorn corals. Coral Reefs 23, 406–409 (2004).
Kaniewska, P., Alon, S., Karako-Lampert, S., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. & Levy, O. Signaling cascades and the importance of moonlight in coral broadcast mass spawning. Elife 4, e09991 (2015).
Lin, C. H., Takahashi, S., Mulla, A. J. & Nozawa, Y. Moonrise timing is key for synchronized spawning in coral Dipsastraea speciosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, e2101985118 (2021).
Kawaguti, S. On the physiology of reef corals V. Tropisms of coral planulae, considered as a factor of distribution of the reefs. Palao Trop. Biol. Stat. Stud. 2, 319–328 (1941).
Mulla, A. J., Lin, C. H., Takahashi, S. & Nozawa, Y. Photo-movement of coral larvae influences vertical positioning in the ocean. Coral Reefs 40, 1297–1306 (2021).
Sakai, Y. et al. A step-down photophobic response in coral larvae: implications for the light-dependent distribution of the common reef coral. Acropora tenuis. Sci. Rep. 10, 17680 (2020).
Mundy, C. N. & Babcock, R. C. Role of light intensity and spectral quality in coral settlement: implications for depth-dependent settlement?. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 223, 235–255 (1998).
Strader, M. E., Davies, S. W. & Matz, M. V. Differential responses of coral larvae to the colour of ambient light guide them to suitable settlement microhabitat. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 150358 (2015).
Ricardo, G. F. et al. Impacts of water quality on Acropora coral settlement: the relative importance of substrate quality and light. Sci. Total Environ. 777, 146079 (2021).
Koyanagi, M. & Terakita, A. Diversity of animal opsin-based pigments and their optogenetic potential. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 1837, 710–716 (2014).
Terakita, A. The opsins. Genome Biol. 6, 213 (2005).
Terakita, A. & Nagata, T. Functional properties of opsins and their contribution to light-sensing physiology. Zoolog. Sci. 31, 653–659 (2014).
Wada, S. et al. Color opponency with a single kind of bistable opsin in the zebrafish pineal organ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 11310–11315 (2018).
Gornik, S. G. et al. Photoreceptor diversification accompanies the evolution of Anthozoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 1744–1760 (2020).
Kozmik, Z. et al. Assembly of the cnidarian camera-type eye from vertebrate-like components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 8989–8993 (2008).
Koyanagi, M. et al. Jellyfish vision starts with cAMP signaling mediated by opsin-Gs cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 15576–15580 (2008).
Mason, B. et al. Evidence for multiple phototransduction pathways in a reef-building coral. PLoS ONE 7, e50301 (2012).
Suga, H., Schmid, V. & Gehring, W. J. Evolution and functional diversity of jellyfish opsins. Curr. Biol. 18, 51–55 (2008).
Feuda, R., Hamilton, S. C., Mclnerney, J. O. & Pisani, D. Metazoan opsin evolution reveals a simple route to animal vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 18868–18872 (2012).
Hering, L. & Mayer, G. Analysis of the opsin repertoire in the tardigrade Hypsibius dujardini provides insights into the evolution of opsin genes in Panarthropoda. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 2380–2391 (2014).
Ramirez, M. D. et al. The last common ancestor of most bilaterian animals possessed at least nine opsins. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 3640–3652 (2016).
Liegertová, M. et al. Cubozoan genome illuminates functional diversification of opsins and photoreceptor evolution. Sci. Rep. 5, 11885 (2015).
Plachetzki, D. C., Degnan, B. M. & Oakley, T. H. The origins of novel protein interactions during animal opsin evolution. PLoS ONE 2, e1054 (2007).
Sugihara, T., Nagata, T., Mason, B., Koyanagi, M. & Terakita, A. Absorption characteristics of vertebrate non-visual opsin, Opn3. PLoS ONE 11, e0161215 (2016).
Saito, T., Koyanagi, M., Sugihara, T., Nagata, T. & Arikawa, K. Spectral tuning mediated by helix III in butterfly long wavelength-sensitive visual opsins revealed by heterologous action spectroscopy. Zool. Lett. 5, 35 (2019).
Govardovskii, V. I., Fyhrquist, N., Reuter, T., Kuzmin, D. G. & Donner, K. In search of the visual pigment template. Vis. Neurosci. 17, 509–528 (2000).
Terakita, A. et al. Expression and comparative characterization of Gq-coupled invertebrate visual pigments and melanopsin. J. Neurochem. 105, 883–890 (2008).
Sun, L. et al. Distribution of mammalian-like melanopsin in cyclostome retinas exhibiting a different extent of visual functions. PLoS ONE 9, e108209 (2014).
Wagdi, A. et al. Selective optogenetic control of Gq signaling using human Neuropsin. Nat. Commun. 13, 1765 (2022).
Yamashita, T. et al. Opn5 is a UV-sensitive bistable pigment that couples with Gi subtype of G protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 22084–22089 (2010).
Kojima, D. et al. UV-sensitive photoreceptor protein OPN5 in humans and mice. PLoS ONE 6, e26388 (2011).
Zhukovsky, E. A. & Oprian, D. D. Effect of carboxylic acid side chains on the absorption maximum of visual pigments. Science 246, 928–930 (1989).
Sakmar, T. P., Franke, R. R. & Khorana, H. G. Glutamic acid-113 serves as the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in bovine rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 8309–8313 (1989).
Nathans, J. Determinants of visual pigment absorbance: identification of the retinylidene Schiff’s base counterion in bovine rhodopsin. Biochemistry 29, 9746–9752 (1990).
Terakita, A., Yamashita, T. & Shichida, Y. Highly conserved glutamic acid in the extracellular IV-V loop in rhodopsins acts as the counterion in retinochrome, a member of the rhodopsin family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 14263–14267 (2000).
Terakita, A. et al. Counterion displacement in the molecular evolution of the rhodopsin family. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 284–289 (2004).
Gerrard, E. et al. Convergent evolution of tertiary structure in rhodopsin visual proteins from vertebrates and box jellyfish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 6201–6206 (2018).
Nagata, T. et al. The counterion–retinylidene Schiff base interaction of an invertebrate rhodopsin rearranges upon light activation. Commun. Biol. 2, 180 (2019).
Cao, P. et al. Light-sensitive coupling of rhodopsin and melanopsin to G i/o and G q signal transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J. 26, 480–491 (2012).
Airan, R. D., Thompson, K. R., Fenno, L. E., Bernstein, H. & Deisseroth, K. Temporally precise in vivo control of intracellular signalling. Nature 458, 1025–1029 (2009).
Ajith Karunarathne, W. K., Giri, L., Kalyanaraman, V. & Gautam, N. Optically triggering spatiotemporally confined GPCR activity in a cell and programming neurite initiation and extension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 1565–1574 (2013).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Kozlov, A. M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455 (2019).
Darriba, Di. et al. ModelTest-NG: A new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 291–294 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Robert S. Molday (University of British Columbia) for kindly supplying rho1D4-producing hybridoma. This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP15H05777 and JP20K21434 (A.T.), JP20K21433 and JP21H00435 (M.K.), JP20J01841 (Y.S.), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology Grant Number JPMJCR1753 (A.T.) and JST Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology Grant Number JPMJPR13A2 (M.K.). B.M. was supported by an NSF International Research Postdoctoral Fellowship (Award ID: 1158967). Y.S. is supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.M.M., M.K., and A.T. conceived the study. B.M.M., M.K., V.S, D.J.M, and A.T. designed research. B.M.M., M.K., T.S., M.I., and Y.S. conducted experiments and analysis. B.M.M., M.K., and A.T. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mason, B.M., Koyanagi, M., Sugihara, T. et al. Multiple opsins in a reef-building coral, Acropora millepora. Sci Rep 13, 1628 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28476-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28476-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.