The purposes of this study were (i) to describe differences in participation in 100-mile ultra-marathons by continent; (ii) to investigate differences in performance between continents; and (iii) to identify the fastest runners by continent and country. Data from 148,169 athletes (119,408 men), aged 18–81 years, and finishers in a 100-miles ultra-marathon during 1870–2020 were investigated. Information about age, gender, origin, performance level (top three, top 10, top 100) was obtained. Kruskal–Wallis tests and linear regressions were performed. Athletes were mostly from America and Europe. A macro-analysis showed that the fastest men runners were from Africa, while the fastest women runners were from Europe and Africa. Women from Sweden, Hungary and Russia presented the best performances in the top three, top 10 and top 100. Men from Brazil, Russia and Lithuania were the fastest. The lowest performance and participation were observed for runners from Asia. In summary, in 100-miles ultra-marathon running, the majority of athletes were from America, but for both sexes and performance levels, the fastest runners were from Africa. On a country level, the fastest women were from Sweden, Hungary and Russia, while the fastest men were from Brazil, Russia and Lithuania.
The athletes’ performance is influenced by both individual (e.g., genetic, morphological, training) and environmental factors (e.g., coach, family, social characteristics)1,2. Moving beyond the athlete-centered approach, recent studies were developed to understand the role of the environment in the athlete’s performance3,4,5. The ‘birthplace effect’ has been largely studied in team sports, such as soccer6, ice hockey7, basketball8, volleyball9, and handball10.
Furthermore, among individual sports such as running, the interest in understanding the link between the environment and the athletes’ performance has increased in the last years11,12. These interests were associated with the increasing numbers of both runners and running events across the world13, especially after the 1970’s in North America and after the 1980’s in Europe14.
There is ample evidence that the fastest long-distance runners, such as marathoners, originate from the African continent, particularly from Kenya and Ethiopia15,16. This representation is related to a plethora of factors, which include–but are not limited to–physiological characteristics, training, lifestyle behaviors, and motivational factors17,18. Considering Brazil, the Southeast region as the richest region of the country is the region with the highest number of elite long-distance runners in the country19.
However, in the context of ultra-marathon running, little is known about where the fastest ultra-marathoners come from. One of the few studies found that Russian and Japanese were the fastest for the 100-km ultra-marathon race distance16,20. Similar results were found by Cejka et al.21, where most of the finishers in 100-km ultra-marathons were from Europe, but Japanese runners were the fastest. On the other hand, data covering 96,036 athletes (88,286 men and 7,750 women) finishing the oldest 100-km ultra-marathon in the world (‘100 km Lauf Biel’ in Switzerland), showed that Switzerland, Germany, and France were the countries with the highest number of participants throughout the history of the race22. These initial insights suggest that the place of the competition and the countries’ economic indicators are related to these results.
To date, most studies regarding participation and performance trends have shown an increase in the number of finishers in the last decades’23,24, especially in events hosted in the USA, where most of the events were taking place24,25. Notwithstanding the relevance of these studies, it is important to present a more generalized view by using a macro-level approach investigating the between-continents differences, followed by a micro-level analysis within-country. It has also been shown that athletes from specific countries improved their performance over years in specific races such as the ‘Spartathlon’26 whereas in other races such as the ‘100 km Lauf Biel’, the performance of athletes from specific countries decreased22. Generally, the fastest athletes were able to improve their performance across years in the world’s most famous ultra-marathon races such as the ‘Spartathlon’26 and the ‘Comrades’27.
In this sense, the purposes of this study were (i) to verify the participation of athletes by continent and country in 100-mile ultra-marathons (161-km) performed between 1870 and 2020, (ii) to compare the athletes’ performance between continents and countries, (iii) to identify the fastest athletes by country and by continent and, (iv) to investigate the trend in performance over years of the athletes from the fastest countries. Previous studies showed that North America and Europe presented higher numbers of ultra-marathon events worldwide (431 and 455, respectively)25 compared to Asia (139), Africa (59), Australia (35), South America (18), as well as a higher participation in 161-km ultra-marathons28. For another way, Russian athletes were the fastest in long-distance running races such as the ‘Comrades Marathon’29, and in 100-km ultra-marathon running races20. Based on it, we hypothesized that (i) the highest number of athletes would be found on the American continent, especially in USA and Canada, while Russian runners would be the fastest and (ii) the fastest runners would be able to improve their performance over time.
The study was performed following the Declaration of Helsinki, and the institutional review board of St Gallen, Switzerland, approved this study (EKSG 01/06/2010). Since the study involved the analysis of publicly available data, the requirement for informed consent was waived. Participants were not identified during the data management and during all sections of the manuscript.
Design and sample
Data used in the present study was obtained from the website of the ‘Deutsche Ultramarathon-Vereinigung’ DUV (https://statistik.d-u-v.org/geteventlist.php) and corresponded to the officially available results of the participants enrolled in 100-mile (161 km) ultra-marathon race events held during 1870–2020 for both genders. The available information included the year of the event, race distance, year of birth, gender, general ranking, country, team, mean running speed, and race time. Based on this information, we clustered the athletes by country and then by continent (e.g., Africa, America, Asia, Oceania, and Europe). Performance levels were categorized based on the general classification considering the top three, top 10 and top 100 for both genders. Exclusion criteria were: athletes aged below 18 years, athletes clustered in countries with less than 10 participations (when comparison within a continent was made), mean running speed higher than 20 km/h, and missing information about the country of origin.
Descriptive information was presented in mean (standard deviation), minimum (min), maximum (max) values, and frequency (%). Data normality was formally tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Based on the athletes’ performance, runners were classified considering their ranking position (top 100, top 10, and top three), for both genders. Following, athletes were clustered based on their birthplace (e.g., country and continent). To compare the performance level according to the continent, we performed the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by the post-hoc test adjusted by the number of comparisons.
A simple linear regression was performed to verify the performance trends. Running speed (miles/h) was the outcome variable, while the time (year) was considered as a predictor. The regression was performed considering both, the total sample and the ranking position (top three, top 10, and top 100), as well as the three best countries over time for both genders. For the total sample regression analysis, we considered data from the 1970s, since a running boom in high and middle-income countries from this decade was verified 30. For the three best countries according to the performance level, we considered data from 2010. Data analysis was performed in the SPSS 26, and the significance level was set at 0.05.
A total of 148,169 athletes aged 18–81 years and of both genders (women = 28,761; men = 119,408), finished at least one 100-mile ultra-marathon during 1870–2020. Athletes came from 113 countries from all five continents. Most of them were from the American continent (72.7%), followed by Europe (15.9%), Asia (5.6%), Africa (3.7%), and Oceania (2.1%). Running speed distribution between athletes showed a similar pattern for all continents. Most of the runners presented mean values of 5–7 miles/h, and a small number of athletes presented running speeds higher than 10 miles/h. Mean running speed was 6.12 miles/h for the total sample (women = 5.96 miles/h; men = 6.21 miles/h).
Participation and performance by continent—a macro-analysis
Figure 1 presents the distribution of the athletes, according to their continent of origin into different performance groups (top three, top 10, top 100, and all athletes) for both genders. Most women in all the performance levels were from the American continent, followed by Europe. Visual differences are presented for the top three and top 10, where Oceania has a higher number of athletes compared to the African continent (e.g., top three and top 10).
Considering athletes clustering by continent, significant differences in performance were shown (H(4) = 1766.22; p < 0.001). The descriptive analysis showed that African women achieved the highest mean running speed (6.89 ± 1.04 miles/h), followed by athletes from Europe (6.45 ± 1.38 miles/h), America (5.89 ± 1.01 miles/h), Oceania (5.85 ± 1.37 miles/h), and Asia (5.17 ± 1.49 miles/h). Significant differences were observed between most of the continents, except between America and Oceania (p-adjusted = 0.178). For men, for all the performance levels (top three, top 10, top 100 and all athletes), most of the athletes were from both the American and the European continent. The lowest percentages of participation were found for Oceania. Considering the performance by continent, athletes from Africa presented the highest mean values for running speed (7.42 ± 1.33 miles/h), followed by Europe (6.53 ± 1.53 miles/h), Oceania (6.39 ± 1.59 miles/h), America (6.13 ± 1.17 miles/h), and Asia (5.34 ± 1.47 miles/h). Differences in the performance were found between continents (H(4) = 859.43; p < 0.001), with significant differences between all of them.
Participation and performance by country—a micro-analysis
For the top three athletes, a total of 36 and 65 countries were listed for both women and men, respectively. Most of the athletes were from the USA (62.1% and 56.9% for women and men, respectively). Similarly, the highest number of athletes from the USA were observed in the top 10 (62.6% and 58.4% for women and men, respectively) and top 100 (72.4% and 66% for women and men, respectively). Therefore, within the European continent, the majority of the athletes were from Germany and the Great-Britain for all performance levels.
Table 1 presents the results for the comparison between performance levels for both genders. Significant differences were observed for both genders and all performance levels. For men athletes, the fastest runners were from the African continent. For the top three women, the fastest ones were from Europe, while for the top 10 and top 100 the fastest were Africans.
Table 2 presents the descriptive results for women runners, considering athletes from the fastest country in each continent and the performance level (e.g., top three, top 10 and top 100). For the African continent, the fastest women were from South Africa, in the three performance groups. For the other continents, there was no verified pattern of association between the countries and performance levels, nonetheless, the highest running speeds were observed in the European continent when compared to the other continents. Among the top three, top 10 and top 100, women from Sweden, Hungary and Russia achieved the fastest running speeds.
Men descriptive results for athletes from the fastest countries in each continent are presented in Table 3. For the top three, the fastest athletes were from America (Brazil: 9.54 ± 1.75 miles/h). In the top 10 and top 100, athletes from Europe (e.g., Russia and Lithuania) presented the highest mean running speed compared to the other continents.
Figure 2 presents the performance trend results for both genders considering all the sample. For all performance groups and both genders, performance decreased over time (p < 0.001).
Figure 3 presents the linear regression results for performance across time considering athletes from the best countries in the top three, top 10, and top 100, respectively. For women, runners from Russia, Hungary, and Finland were the fastest, while runners from Brazil, Russia, and Lithuania were the fastest among men. The time frame considered was the last 10 years (from 2010), in which a significant performance decline was shown for women from Sweden (r2 = 0.10; p < 0.001; 95%CI = − 0.18– − 0.08). Based on the r2 values, the magnitude of the performance decline was about 0.10miles/h across the years. For men, performance decline was showed for Brazilian (r2 = 0.27; p < 0.001; 95%CI = − 0.47 – − 0.18) and Russian runners (r2 = 0.02; p = 0.017; 95%CI = − 0.18 – − 0.018), in which a decline of 0.27 miles/h and 0.02 miles/h was showed across the years, respectively. Athletes from Lithuania presented a visual increase in running speed over the last 10 years, however, a non-significant effect was shown.
The purpose of this study was to identify where the fastest runners in 100 miles ultra-marathons come from, considering the performance level. The main results showed that (i) for both genders and all performance levels, most of the athletes were from the American and European continents; (ii) a macro-analysis showed that the fastest men were from Africa, while the fastest women were from Europe and Africa; (iii) women from Sweden, Hungary and Russia presented the best performance in top three, top 10 and top 100; (iv) men runners from Brazil, Russia and Lithuania were the fastest in top three, top 10 and top 100, respectively; and (v) the lowest performance and participation were achieved by athletes from Asia.
Participation and performance by continent—a macro-analysis
The first important finding was that most of the finishers were from America, but African runners were the fastest when analysis was performed by continent. These findings confirm our hypothesis. For both genders, the highest runner’s frequency was from the American continent, especially from the USA. Similar results were reported by Hoffman23 in 100 miles (161 km) ultra-marathon running competition in North America. The authors showed that from 1977 to 2008, the number of annual finish rates increased, but no improvements in performance were verified23.
The results of the present study can be related to the American cultural and fitness revolutions of the 1960s and 1970s, which included a ‘running boom’13. Specifically for the ultra-marathon races, a historical perspective ˗ the USA was one of the main ultra-marathon birthplaces around the world31—can influence the highest number of race events and athletes from these countries. In addition, the increase in participation among women and older athletes can be associated with this result32. A previous report covering approximately 107 million race results from 1986 to 2018 showed that the USA was the country with the highest number of runners, but with the slowest athletes33. Accordingly, the highest proportions of women participants were from USA and Canada, while Switzerland and Italy were the countries with the lowest women participation33.
The highest participation of these countries can be related to the highest number of ultra-marathon events performed in these countries25. Regarding continents, 443 ultra-marathon events were developed in America, where 431 are situated in North America. Following, Europe hosted 421 events. For data used in this study, more than half of the race events were performed in EUA (58.5%), with about 20% performed in Great Britain (5.6%), Australia (4.8%), South Africa (4.7%), Canada (4.6%), and Germany (3.4%). Besides the higher events performed in-locus, the athletes’ socioeconomic characteristics can also be related to running participation34,35. Athletes from a high-income country can present a better contextual indicator for traveling and participating in remote events36. In another way, the lowest performances showed for athletes from the USA can be related to changes in running motivation across the years. As shown in studies that include short to long-distance events, the psychological, social, and physical are the main reasons for running37,38,39, especially in non-professional athletes.
The macro-analysis has shown that the African continent presented the best mean values for running speed. This is an interesting finding, considering that African athletes are the strongest in long-distance running such as half-marathon and marathon15,40. However, these runners are from Kenya and Ethiopia, different from the present results, where most of them are from South Africa. These results are similar to findings in a previous report covering 85% of ultra-running events worldwide during 1996–2018, including trail runs, mountain runs and road runs. South Africa was the country with the fastest athletes, with a running pace of 10:36 min/mile, followed by Sweden (11:56 min/mile), Germany (12:01 min/mile), Netherlands (12:41 min/mile), and Great-Britain (12:44 min/mile), while the slowest were from Argentina (15:20 min/mile), Mexico (15:30 min/mile) and Malaysia (15:55 min/mile). These results were also associated with findings that countries from Asia presented the poorest performance36.
Participation and performance by country—a micro-analysis
The micro-analysis showed that athletes from Sweden, Hungary, and Russia presented the best performance in the top three, top 10, and top 100 for women, and those from Brazil, Russia, and Lithuania were the fastest in the top three, top 10, and top 100 for men. We hypothesized that the fastest runners would originate from Russia, but the results partially disagree. These differences can be related to the methodological approach for the present study where we present the data for performance level (i.e., top three, top 10, top 100). For example, Nikolaidis et al.16, in a study including athletes ranked in World Athletics (i.e., IAAF) during 1999–2015, showed that among women, athletes from Russia were faster than athletes from France and Germany in ultra-marathon events. Similar results were shown in athletes who finished a 100-km ultra-marathon between 1959 and 201620, when considering the top 10 by nationality, runners from Russia and Hungary were the fastest.
Men from Brazil in the top three are untypical considering previous studies16,20,41. Notwithstanding, regarding the increase in runner’s participants and race events across the country42,43, few studies were developed to understand the participation and performance in ultra-running events44,45. The country characteristics, which include variations in weather, altimetry, nutritional habits, cultural aspects, and lifestyle among the regions, should be investigated in future studies to understand the association with performance in ultramarathon events.
Considering both, the total sample and the fastest countries, performance decreased over time for both genders and performance levels. These results are similar to previous findings23,32. These results can be linked to the changes in the runner’s profile (e.g., intrapersonal motivation, training background, previous experience)46,47,48, and event characteristics (weather, altimetry). Differently, athletes from Lithuania showed an increase in performance over the last few years. This increase was not statistically significant, however, factors that explain these results can be related to the low number of athletes over the years, which can bias the results. The generalization of the present findings need to be considered carefully. In another way, the decrease in performance in other countries is according to previous findings, showing that countries have slowed down over the last 10 years and that those with have slowed down most are among the slowest in the rankings36.
More and more is known about the factors that predispose to achieve outstanding results in ultramarathon running, but without pointing to the most important ones49. Gajda et al. considered the success in ultra-marathons as a complex multifactorial cause and called them the “mosaic theory”. Among the factors that guarantee success they mention genetic factors such as the presence of haplogroup H mtDNA (subgroup HV0a1, belonging to the HV cluster), characterizing athletes with the greatest endurance49. Normal resistance to pain is also important50. However, none of these factors isolated guarantees success for an individual athlete or a particular nation in ultra-marathons. Additional investigations considering the environment (natural, built, and social) are necessary.
Limitations and strengths
Limitations of the study are related to the nature of the data used. The accuracy of the data (e.g., the race distance in each event, the accuracy of the information in the first years, and the information about the birthplace of the athletes), as well as the missing data in specific time frames, and sample size variability between countries need to be considered. These limitations are challenged to be solved. To reduce the bias, the countries with a total number of athletes below 10, as well as the regression analysis with data before the 1970s were not considered. In addition, information about individual (e.g., training volume and intensity, running experience, running strategies) and contextual factors (i.e., number of competitions, economical support, cultural aspects and race course, different elevation changes, weather) are unavailable. Individual and contextual characteristics are helpful to deeply understand runners’ profile, as well as to deeply understand the impact of hosting events’ effect, and the characteristics of the race course for runners’ performance. The role of the individual characteristics for ultramarathon performance was previously investigated, however, little information is available about the role of social, economic, cultural, and geographical characteristics to increase the participation, as well as the role of the participation in performance outcomes. Future studies need to consider data triangulation, including the place in which competitions are performed, the participation and the performance outcomes, adopting different strategies regarding the performance level and sample size required within countries. Finally, we did not control for the migration or multiple events participation across the years, that is, an athlete can have moved to represent another country than his/her home country or take part in more than one event over the years. In another way, we presented a detailed analysis, considering both macro-and micro-level approaches. Since the highest number of ultramarathon events are performed in North America and Europe, even though considering mean values the fastest are from Africa and Europe, the practical application of the present study includes supports local sport police programs to increase the availability of events in countries which they are underrepresented. Athletes living in countries with a higher number of events present a higher participation rate, since the costs (travel, host) are lower51. Additionally, being familiar with local characteristics (language, cultural habits, and weather) is associated with performance improvement51.
For the 100-miles ultra-marathons, most of the athletes were from the American and European continent, despite the fastest being from Africa. A micro-analysis showed that European countries’ (Sweden, Hungary, and Russia) were the best for women, while for men, Brazil, Russia and Lithuania were the fastest in the top three, top 10, and top 100. Regarding the best countries, a decrease in performance was shown over time, except for athletes from Lithuania. These results can be used to public policies to provide the highest number of race events among countries, especially those in Asia and Oceania, which showed the lowest engagement.
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Tucker, R. & Collins, M. What makes champions? A review of the relative contribution of genes and training to sporting success. Br. J. Sports Med. 46(8), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090548 (2012).
Yan, X., Papadimitriou, I., Lidor, R. & Eynon, N. Nature versus nurture in determining athletic ability. Med. Sport Sci. 61, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445238 (2016).
Cote, J., Macdonald, D., Baker, J. & Abernethy, B. When, “where” is more important than “when”: Birthplace and birthdate effects on the achievement of sporting expertise. J. Sports Sci. 24(10), 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500432490 (2006).
Rees, T. et al. The great British medalists project: A review of current knowledge on the development of the world’s best sporting talent. Sports Med. 46(8), 1041–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0476-2 (2016).
Rossing, N. N., Stentoft, D., Flattum, A., Côté, J. & Karbing, D. S. Influence of population size, density, and proximity to talent clubs on the likelihood of becoming elite youth athlete. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 28(3), 1304–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13009 (2018).
Smith, K. L. & Weir, P. L. Female youth soccer participation and continued engagement: Associations with community size, community density, and relative age. Front. Sports Act Liv. 2, 552597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.552597 (2020).
Wattie, N., Schorer, J. & Baker, J. Seeing the forest but not the trees: Heterogeneity in community size effects in Canadian ice hockey players. J. Sports Sci. 36(4), 436–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1313444 (2018).
Leite, N., Arede, J., Shang, X., Calleja-González, J. & Lorenzo, A. The influence of contextual aspects in talent development: Interaction between relative age and birthplace effects in NBA-drafted players. Front Sports Act Living. 3, 642707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.642707 (2021).
Hancock, D. J., Coutinho, P., Côté, J. & Mesquita, I. Influences of population size and density on birthplace effects. J Sports Sci. 36(1), 33–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1276614 (2018).
Rossing, N. N., Nielsen, A. B., Elbe, A. M. & Karbing, D. S. The role of community in the development of elite handball and football players in Denmark. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 16(2), 237–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2015.1009492 (2016).
Santos, P. A. et al. Human development index and the frequency of nations in athletics world rankings. Sport Sci. Health. 15(2), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-019-00529-1 (2019).
Truyens, J., Bosscher, V. D., Heyndels, B. & Westerbeek, H. A resource-based perspective on countries’ competitive advantage in elite athletics. Int. J. Sport Policy Polit. 6(3), 459–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.839954 (2014).
Scheerder, J., Breedveld, K., Borgers, J. Running across Europe—The Rise and Size of One of the Largest Sport Markets. Scheerder J, Breedveld K, Borgers J (eds) (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2015.
van Mechelen, W. Running injuries. A review of the epidemiological literature. Sports Med. 14(5), 320–35. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199214050-00004 (1992).
Hamilton, B. East African running dominance: What is behind it?. Br. J. Sports Med. 34, 391–394 (2000).
Nikolaidis, P. T., Onywera, V. & Knechtle, B. Running performance, nationality, sex, and age in the 10-km, half-marathon, marathon, and the 100-km ultramarathon IAAF 1999–2015. J. Strength Cond. Res. 31(8), 2189–2207. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001687 (2017).
Onywera, V., Scott, R. A., Boit, M. K. & Pitsiladis, Y. P. Demographic characteristics of elite Kenyan endurance runners. J. Sports Sci. 24(4), 415–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500189033 (2006).
Wilber, R. & Pitsiladis, Y. Kenyan and Ethiopian distance runners: What makes them so good?. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 7(2), 92–102 (2012).
Thuany, M., Gomes, T. N., Souza, R. F., Almeida, M. (2021) Onde estão os melhores corredores do Brasil? Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento: In press.
Knechtle, B., Nikolaidis, P. T. & Valeri, F. Russians are the fastest 100-km ultra-marathoners in the world. PLoS ONE. 13(7), e0199701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199701 (2018).
Cejka, N. et al. Participation and performance trends in 100-km ultra-marathons worldwide. J. Sports Sci. 32(4), 354–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.825729 (2014).
Knechtle, B., Scheer, V., Nikolaidis, P. T. & Sousa, C. V. Participation and performance trends in the oldest 100-km ultramarathon in the world. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17, 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051719 (2020).
Hoffman, M. Performance trends in 161-km ultramarathons. Int. J. Sports Med. 31, 31–37 (2010).
Hoffman, M., Ong, J. & Wang, G. Historical analysis of participation in 161 km ultramarathons in North America. Int. J. Hist. Sport. 27(11), 1877–1891 (2010).
Worlds' marathon. (2021) Ultra marathon destinations by continent [cited 2022 26 February]. Available from: https://worldsmarathons.com/c/running/destinations/ultra_marathon.
Knechtle, B. et al. From athens to sparta—37 years of spartathlon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18(9), 4914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094914 (2021).
Nikolaidis, P. T., Knechtle, B., Vancini, R., Gomes, M. & Sousa, C. Participation and performance in the oldest ultramarathon-Comrades marathon 1921–2019. Int. J. Sports Med. 42(7), 638–644. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1303-4255 (2021).
Gerosa, D., Rüst, C. A., Rosemann, T. & Knechtle, B. Participation and performance trends in 161km ultra-marathons in terms of nationality: A retrospective data analysis of worldwide participation from 1998–2011. J. Human Sport Exerc. 9(2), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2014.92.01 (2014).
Nikolaidis, P. T. & Knechtle, B. Russians are the fastest and the youngest in the “Comrades marathon”. J. Sports Sci. 37(12), 1387–1392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1559979 (2019).
Haberman, A. L. Thousands of solitary runners come together: Individualism and communitarianism in the 1970s running boom. J. Sport Hist. 44(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.5406/jsporthistory.44.1.0035 (2017).
Noakes, T. D. The limits of endurance exercise. Basic Res. Cardiol. 101(5), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-006-0607-2 (2006).
Hoffman, M. D. & Wegelin, J. A. The western states 100-mile endurance run: Participation and performance trends. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41(12), 2191–2198. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a8d553 (2009).
Andersen, J. J. (2019) The State of Running 2019: RunRepeat [17 August 2020]. Available from: https://runrepeat.com/state-of-running.
Breuer, C., Hallmann, K. & Wicker, P. Determinants of sport participation in different sports. Manag. Leis. 16(4), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2011.613625 (2013).
Thuany, M., Gomes, T. N., Almeida, M. (2020) Running around the country: Uma análise do fenômeno out running entre corredores brasileiros.
RunRepeat. (2021) The State of Ultra Running 2020 [cited 2021 24 September 2021]. Available from: https://runrepeat.com/state-of-ultra-running.
Poczta, J. & Malchrowicz-Mośko, E. Running as a form of therapy socio-psychological functions of mass running events for men and women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 15(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102262 (2018).
Krouse, R., Ransdell, L., Lucas, S. & Pritchard, M. Motivation, goal orientation, coaching, and training habits of women ultrarunners. J. Strength Cond. Res. 1, 2835–2842. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318207e964 (2011).
Goodsell, T. L., Harris, B. D. & Bailey, B. W. Family status and motivations to run: A qualitative study of marathon runners. Leis. Sci. 35(4), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2013.797326 (2013).
Noble, T. J. & Chapman, R. F. Marathon specialization in elites: A head start for africans. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 13(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0069 (2020).
Nikolaidis, P. T. & Knechtle, B. Russians are the fastest and the youngest in the “Comrades marathon”. J. Sports Sci. 37(12), 1387–1392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1559979 (2019).
Salgado, J. V. V. & Chacon-Mikahil, M. P. T. Corrida de rua: Análise do crescimento do número de provas e de praticantes. Conexões 4(1), 90–98 (2006).
de Atletismo, FP. (2019) Demonstrativo de Corridas de Rua nos Últimos Anos no Estado de São Paulo [cited 2019 Novembro]. Available from: www.atletismofpa.org.br/source/Demonstrativo-de-Corridas-de-Rua-nos-Ultimos-Anos-no-Estado-de-Sao-Paulo-2017.pdf.
Alves, D., Cruz, R., Lima-Silva, A., Domingos, P., Bertuzzi, R., Osiecki, R., et al. (2019) Are experienced and high-level race walking athletes able to match pre-programmed with executed pacing?. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 52(6) https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20198593.
Fonseca, F. S., Cavalcante, J. A. M., Almeida, L. S. C. & Fialho, J. V. A. P. Análise do perfil sociodemográfico, motivos de adesão, rotina de treinamento e acompanhamento profissional de praticantes de corrida de rua. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Mov. 27, 189–198 (2019).
Waśkiewicz, Z., Nikolaidis, P., Chalabaev, A., Rosemann, T. & Knechtle, B. Motivation in ultra-marathon runners. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 12, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s189061 (2019).
Knechtle, B. Ultramarathon runners: Nature or nurture?. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 7(4), 310–312. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.7.4.310 (2012).
Knechtle, B. & Nikolaidis, P. Physiology and pathophysiology in ultra-marathon running. Front. Physiol. 9, 634. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00634 (2018).
Gajda, R. et al. To be a champion of the 24-h ultramarathon race. If not the heart mosaic theory?. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(5), 1–25 (2021).
Gajda, R., Walasek, P. & Jarmuszewski, M. Right knee—The weakest point of the best ultramarathon runners of the world? A case study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(16), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165955 (2020).
Jürgens, D. et al. An analysis of participation and performance by nationality at “Ironman Switzerland” from 1995 to 2011. J. Sci. Cycl. 1(2), 10–20 (2012).
This research has not received any kind of financial support. All the work was done voluntarily for the preparation of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Thuany, M., Weiss, K., Villiger, E. et al. A macro to micro analysis to understand performance in 100-mile ultra-marathons worldwide. Sci Rep 13, 1415 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28398-2
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.