Abstract
Enterococcus faecalis is associated with streptococcosis like infection in fish. A whole-genome sequence study was conducted to investigate the virulence factor and antibiotic-resistance genes in three fish pathogenic E. faecalis. Genomic DNA was extracted from three strains of E. faecalis isolated from streptococcosis infected Nile tilapia (strains BF1B1 and BFFF11) and Thai sarpunti (strain BFPS6). The whole genome sequences of these three strains were performed using a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, Inc.). All three strains conserved 69 virulence factor such as genes associated with protection against oxidative stress, bacterial cell wall synthesis, gelatinase toxin, multiple biofilm-associated genes and capsule producing genes. Moreover, 39 antibiotic-resistance genes against sixteen major groups of antibiotics were identified in the genome sequences of all three strains. The most commonly used antibiotic Tetracycline resistance genes were found only in BFPS6 strain, whereas, Bacteriocin synthesis genes were identified in both BFFF11 and BFPS6 strain. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that strains BF1B1 and BFFF1 form a different cluster than BFPS6. This is one of the first whole-genome sequence study of fish pathogenic E. faecalis, unfold new information on the virulence factor and Antibiotic resistance genes linked to pathogenicity in fish.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Aquaculture is one of the fastest-growing sub-unit of the animal food sector that plays a crucial role in global food security1. Global fish production has increased three folds during the last two decades from 34 Mt in 1997 to 112 Mt in 2017 and reached 179 Mt in 2018 with the upward trend expected to continue in the near future2,3. Recent technological advancement and intensification have expedited the global boom of aquaculture1. However, disease is considered one of the foremost threats in intensive aquaculture4. Streptococcosis, columnaris, vibriosis, hemorrhagic septicemia, edwardsiellosis etc. are the major bacterial diseases that most frequently occurs in tilapia and other aquaculture species5,6,7. Among these, streptococcosis is one of the vital diseases in tilapia caused by a complex group of bacteria including Streptococcus iniae, S. agalactiae, Lactococcus garviae, Vagococcus salmoninarum and Enterococcus spp.5,8,9. The first pathogenic Enterococcus sp. has been identified from streptococcosis like infection in yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) which was named Enterococcus seriolicida10. Later E. seriolicida was reclassified as Lactococcus garvieae. Morita, et al.11 detected L. garvieae as the causal agent of septicemic fatal hemorrhagic disease in fish. Recently, pathogenic Enterococcus faecalis were diagnosed from streptococcosis like infection in Nile tilapia in Egypt, India and Bangladesh12,13,14 and in silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus) in Bangladesh8. Like Streptococcus, E. faecalis is a Gram-positive, cocci belong to the family Enterococcaceae that causes disease in animals, and humans. Our previous studies based on 16S rRNA were conducted to identify few randomly selected strains of E. faecalis such as BFFF11, BFF1B1, BFTS15, BFTS17, BFTS22, BFTS23, BFTS25, BFTS27 and BFTS29 isolated from streptococcosis infected Nile tilapia in Bangladesh. E. faecalis (i.e. strains BFPS1, BFPS3, BFPS6 and BFPS13) were also identified from streptococcosis infected silver barb (B. gonionotus) fish8. Among the strains mentioned earlier, BFFF11, BFF1B1 and BFPS6 appears to be more pathogenic, hence, these three strains were focused in the current study. Most of the previous studies used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to identify fish pathogenic E. faecalis, However, very few studies on the same context were performed based on the whole-genome sequence.
The virulence gene of a pathogen determines the pathogenicity to beat the host defense system and establish disease15. The antimicrobials resistance is another system that plays a crucial role in the virulence mechanism of a pathogen15. The development of antibiotic-resistance genes enables the pathogenic bacteria to adapt and survive in a new environment, particularly during antibiotic treatment15. The increased use of antibiotics in commercial aquaculture enforces the pathogenic bacteria to possess antimicrobial resistance genes16. Although several virulence factors and multidrug resistance genes were reported from human and animal pathogenic E. faecalis17,18, no genes associated with virulence activity and antimicrobial resistance were identified from this fish pathogen. Accurate detection of organism, it’s pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance would be crucial to take timely preventive measures so that disease outbreak can be halted. The genome announcement of the strains BFFF11 and BFPS6 were performed in our previous studies8,19, where details on the virulence and antibiotic resistance genes were not analyzed. We hypothesized that whole-genome sequence as one of the latest biotechnological tools, would be able to detect the virulence factors of the pathogenic E. faecalis. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to identify the virulence factors and antibiotic-resistance genes profile through whole-genome sequencing of the fish pathogenic E. faecalis strains isolated from diseased fishes in Bangladesh.
Results
Isolation, phenotypic identification, pathogenicity and antibiogram profiling
Enterococcus faecalis strains BFF1B1, BFFF11 and BFPS6 were cultured in Streptococcus selective agar media (Himedia, India). The culture characteristics such as colony, morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of these strains BFF1B1, BFFF11 and BFPS6 were summarized in the Supplementary Table S1. All of these strains were Gram-positive, cocci shaped, non-motile and produce dark red colonies while culturing in agar media. They were catalase, oxidase, urease, Arabinose, Fructose, Inositol, Inulin, Raffinose and Xylose negative. They produced β hemolysis in sheep blood agar media. The antibiogram profiling of these strains were performed using disk diffusion methods against eleven commercial antibiotics (Supplementary Table S2). We observed that all strains were resistant to Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Cefuroxime, Erythromycin and Penicillin. Moreover, the strain BFPS6 was also resistant to Cefradine. Furthermore, in-vivo challenge test revealed that BFFF11, BFF1B1 and BFPS6 were identified as highly virulent (≥ 80% mortality) strains (Supplementary Table S1).
General features of the genome sequences
The genomic characteristics of the three strains of E. faecalis associated with streptococcosis in fish were studied using a subsystem set of seed viewer. The genome sizes of the strains BFF1B1, BFFF11 and BFPS6 were 2.76, 3.07 and 2.87 Mb, respectively. The GC content (%) of the strains was substantially the same (Table 1). The predicted coding sequences (CDSs) by RAST in the strains BFF1B1, BFFF11 and BFPS6 were 2588, 2870 and 2743, respectively. Only 30–52% CDSs in each strain can be functionally categorized into 250–357 subsystems. On the other hand, PATRIC analysis revealed 2631, 2949 and 2745 CDS in the strains BFF1B1, BFFF11 and BFPS6, respectively. In the subsystems, carbohydrates, amino acids and derivatives and protein metabolism had a higher number of functional genes in all of the studied bacteria. None of the strains carried genes related to photosynthesis and secondary metabolism. An overview of the genome features of the E. faecalis strains and their subsystem statistics were shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1.
According to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes (KEGG) study, the CDSs were classified into six sub-categories including cellular processes (CP), environmental information processing (EIP), genetic information processing (GIP), human disease (HD), organisms system (OS), and metabolism (M) (Fig. 1). The strains BFF1B1, BFFF11 and BFPS6 were found to conserve 1280, 1325 and 1356 CDSs, respectively, that were further divided into 37 functional KEGG sub-categories according to the aforementioned six categories (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S3). Notably, all of the strains contained a significantly higher number of genes related to metabolic pathways (CDSs 753–826), followed by environmental information processing (CDSs 199–197) and genetic information processing (CDSs 186–187) (Supplementary Table S3).
A comparative genomic analysis was performed among the strains where E. faecalis V583 was used as a reference. The genomic map obtained from the BRIG comparison did not show large scale variation between the bacterial genome sequences, and a significant number of non-homologous regions were found around the reference genome with over 80% identity (Fig. 2). Most of these non-homologous regions might be linked to transposable elements.
Virulence factor and biofilm formation-associated genes
The degree of pathogenicity of microbes is greatly influenced by their virulence gene contents. In this study, a total of 69 virulence genes were identified in E. faecalis strains BFFF11, BFF1B1 and BFPS6 (Fig. 3a). Genes associated with protection against oxidative stress (tpx, perR), bacterial cell wall synthesis (psr) and gelatinase toxin (gelE) were identified in all of the three strains. Two extracellular hyaluronidases genes hylA and hylB that evade the phagocytosis process with macrophage persistence of host were identified only in the genome sequence of BFFF11, whereas hylA was found in both BFF1B1 and BFPS6 strains.
Many genes associated with biofilm formation were identified such as two aggregation substances (agg and prgB), endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili genes (ebpA, ebpB, ebpC), collagen adhesion precursor (ace), three proteolytic processing of a quorum-sensing system signal molecule precursors (fsrA, fsrB and fsrC), accessory regulator protein (agrBfs), sugar-sensing transcriptional regulator (bopD), serine protease (sprE) and two genes for sortase assembled pili (srtA and strC). Although strain BFFF11 harbored all of the above biofilm-producing factors; two aggregation substance encoding genes agg and prgB were absent in the genomes of BFF1B1and BFPS6.
Numbers of virulence genes for DNA and protein synthesis were found in the genome sequences of all three strains, namely DNA repair enzymes synthesis gene (recQ1 and phrB), purine metabolism gene (purl), thymidylate synthase (thyA), methionine aminopeptidase (map) and sucrose operon repressors genes (scrB-1 and scrR-1). Among three strains, BFF1B1 and BFFF11 harbor ctrA gene that functions as a negative regulator of DNA replication.
Other virulence factors included sex pheromone associated genes (cad, cCF10, camE, cOB1), the cell wall adhesion expressed in serum gene (efaA), the enterococcal Rgg-like regulator gene, amino acid transport and synthesis regulators (brnQ), and gene associated with macrophage persistence (ElrA). Cytolysin toxin-producing genes cylR2 and cylI was identified in BFF1B1 by VFDB and BFPS6 by PATRIC, however, these were not identified in the BFFF11 strain. Furthermore, 11 capsule producing genes (cpsA to cpsK) associated with anti-phagocytosis were identified in the strain BFFF11; among those only 3 genes (cpsA, cpsB and cpsF) were in the Thai sarpunti originated BFPS6 and only cpsA was found in the BFF1B1. Heat shock regulation protease gene (clpP), translation elongation factor (tufA) and UDP-galactopyranose mutase synthesis gene (glf) which play important roles in cell surface formation and infection cycle of pathogens were found only in the strain BFF1B1. A relatively large number of virulence genes were identified using the VFDB database, and the lowest was identified using the virulence finder (Fig. 3b).
Antibiotic-resistance gene
A total of thirty-nine antibiotic-resistance genes belonging to sixteen different groups were identified among the strains of E. faecalis (Table 2). Except for four genes including tet(M), tet(L), tet(S) and tet(45), all of the genes were conserved by the genome sequences of all three strains of E. faecalis. Although tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, phenicol antibiotics resistant gene YkkCD and tetracyclines, glycylcyclines resistant gene S10p were conserved in all the genome sequences of present study strains, four genes such as tet(M), tet(L), tet(S) and tet(45) conferring resistance to tetracycline were identified only in the genome sequence of BFPS6 with 77.14–100% of identity.
Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) resistant genes lsa(A), RlmA(II) and mph(D) were found in all of the E. faecalis strains. Similarly, two multidrug-resistant efflux pump conferring genes efrA and efrB were identified, found to be resistant against MLS and rifamycin antibiotics. Eight antibiotic-resistance genes included LiaR, LiaS, LiaF, MprF, GdpD, PgsA, rpoB and rpoC were found where seven of them were resistant against daptomycin and rpoB were resistant against rifamycin, daptomycin, rifabutin and rifampin drugs. All three strains harbored genes kasA, FabK, inhA and fabI were resistant to isoniazid and triclosan group of antibiotics. Furthermore, two genes dfr(E) and folA were identified, resistant to diaminopyrimidine (drug class of Trimethoprim), two Aminoglycosides genes gidB and S12p are resistant to streptomycin, two cycloserine resistant genes (Alr and Ddl) and two fluoroquinolones and quinolones resistant genes (gyrA and gyrB) were identified in the genome sequences of all three studied strains. Other notable antibiotic-resistant genes identified in the genome sequences of the studied strains were rho, EF-G, EF-Tu, MurA, Iso-tRNA, folP, VanG and ampS. These genes were found to be resistant against bicyclomycin, fusidic acid, elfamycins, fosfomycin, mupirocin, sulfonamides, and vancomycin and beta-lactamases antibiotics, respectively.
Secondary metabolites
Secondary metabolites often are considered potent sources of virulence factors for a pathogen. Although no potential gene cluster responsible for the biosynthesis of microbial metabolites were found in the strain BFF1B1 by using the antiSMASH software, two gene cluster were identified in the BFFF11, including NRPS (Nonribosomal peptides synthetases) and bacteriocin. Furthermore, a putative bacteriocin gene cluster linked to the potentially interested metabolites was found in the genome sequence of BFPS6.
Bacteriophages
Prophages are bacteriophage mediated mobile genetic elements generally transferred by the transduction process and enable bacteria to obtain antibiotic-resistance or virulence genes. Bacteriophage helps bacteria to become more pathogenic and adapt to a new environment. Bacteriophage related antibiotic-resistance factors were demonstrated by using a phage search tool PHASTER and summarized in Supplementary Table S4. Genomes of the studied Enterococcus strains harbored one incomplete phage region with length 14.6 Kb and GC content ranging from 38.68 to 38.76%. Although one incomplete prophage was identified from genome sequences of BFFF11 and BFF1B1, BFPS6 conserved two incomplete regions. Interestingly, all strains conserved equal length (14.6 kb) of the incomplete region and hit a similar number (15) of phage proteins. The genome of strains BFFF11 and BFPS6 contained one putative intact phage with sizes 40.3 and 37.4 Kb, respectively.
Insertion sequences
Insertion sequences (IS) are small mobile genetic elements that are widely distributed in the bacterial genome. Several groups of IS are found in the genome sequence of bacteria. In the present study, 25 distinct families of insertion elements/ transposes insertions were identified in the genome of E. faecalis strains (Supplementary Table S3). Among these, 14 families (IS3, IS4, IS5, IS6, IS200/IS605, IS256, IS481, IS607, IS630, IS701, IS1595, ISL3, ISKra4 and ISNCY) of transposases were common to the three strains, 3 families (IS30, IS66, IS91) were in BFF1B1 and BFFF11, two were (IS982 and IS1182) in the BFFF11 and BFPS6 and rest 6 families (IS1, IS110, IS1380, IS1634, ISAs1 and Tn3) were found only in the strain BFFF11. In the case of a frequency distribution of IS families, BFPS6 harbored the relatively highest number of IS (N = 115), followed by BFFF11 (N = 85) and BFF1B1 (N = 46). IS family IS200/IS605 were identified as a higher frequency in the strains BFFF11 and BFF1B1 which were 14 and 12, respectively. Significantly higher frequency of IS6 (n = 37) families were identified in BFPS6, followed by IS3 (n = 21) and IS200/IS605 (n = 16). The distribution of the IS families and their members were summarized in Supplementary Table S5.
Phylogenetic tree
A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the single nucleotides polymorphisms (SNPs) analysis. To understand the degree of relatedness with other pathogenic E. faecalis, the whole genome sequence of human, mouse and pig were extracted from NCBI database and used for the analysis of the phylogenetic tree. As E. faecalis caused streptococcosis like infection in fish, fish pathogenic Streptococcus spp. from NCBI were also included in this analysis. In the phylogenetic tree, two distinct clades were formed among the three strains of the fish pathogenic E. faecalis. Tilapia originated strains BFF1B1 and BFFF11 formed a common cluster with the reference strain whereas BFPS6 formed a separate branch closely related to a human originated strain (Fig. 4). Although common disease symptoms were found, fish originated Streptococcus spp. showed a distinct out-group from the E. faecalis pathogen in the phylogenetic study. The average percentage of reference genome covered by all strains was 0.0292%, whereas, in the present study, strains BFF1B1, BFFF11 and BFPS6 covered 78.675, 83.747 and 80.419%, respectively.
Discussion
Streptococcosis is caused by a complex group of bacteria where Enterococcus faecalis is one of the contributing pathogens of the disease. The present study highlighted the genomic features, the virulence associated genes, antibiotic-resistance genes and transfer of genetic elements of three strains of E. faecalis associated with streptococcosis in tilapia and silver barb fishes. The genome size of the E. faecalis strains obtained in this study lies between 2.8 and 3.06 Mb that are similar to the size of E. faecalis reported by the other studies17,18,20.
Virulence factors are the degree of pathogenicity of an organism that is responsible for establishing a disease in the host by combating immunity. A large group of genes conferring virulence factors were found in the genome of E. faecalis strains of the present study. Enterococci conserved genes responsible for biofilm formation have a major role in the pathogenicity and infection as they contribute to virulence and antimicrobial resistance activity21. Mature biofilms contribute to survival against antimicrobial substances at 10–1000-fold greater concentrations compared to the required dose to inhibit planktonic bacteria22. A number of genetic factors are linked to the production of biofilm in enterococci pathogenesis. Several genes were identified from the present study responsible for biofilm formation including aggregation substance (agg), endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili genes (ebpA, ebpB, ebpC), collagen adhesion precursor (ace), sortase (SrtA). Similarly, these biofilm conferring genes were isolated from E. faecalis strains isolated from human, macaques and bovine feces20,23. Biofilm producing genes bopD and serine protease sprE were isolated from BFPS6 in the current study. Similar genes were also recorded in the Enterococcus faecalis strain OG124,25. Transcriptional regulators encoded gene Psr identified in the genome of E. hirae26, play key roles in cell envelope homeostasis, stress tolerance, biofilm formation and modulating the expression of genes27. Likewise, this gene was also found in the genome sequences of E. faecalis in the current study.
Hyaluronidase enzymes are the extracellular hyaluronidase that can degrade a major body matrix fluid hyaluronic acid. Two genes encoding for extracellular hyaluronidase hylA and hylB were found in the genome sequence of BFFF11 and BFPS6 while the latter gene was conserved in the strain BFF1B1. Extracellular hyaluronidase encoded genes were reported from the whole genome sequence of E. faecalis strains isolated from humans18, macaque20 and fish pathogenic Listeria sp.28, Streptococcus sp.29 and Aeromonas sp.30.
Enterococcus faecalis strains encoded three agr-like genes (fsrA, fsrB and fsrC) which are associated with the quorum-sensing mechanism and can control the expression of two virulence genes comprising gelatinase (gelE) and serine protease (sprE)31. Among the three quorum-sensing system signal molecule precursors, fsrB influences the expression of several genes all over the growth phases of bacteria24. These interlinked genes (fsrA, fsrB, fsrC, gelE and sprE) were also identified in all strains in the present study.
Several virulence genes involved in DNA and protein synthesis were identified from the present study strains. Two genes recQ1 and phrB that are encoded for enzymes and could be responsible for DNA damage control and repair32. It was found that the loss of these genes in the pathogens play a role in the killing of a host33 and have sensitivity to the macrophages for oxidative burst34. Furthermore, transcriptional repressor coded genes scrB-1 and scrR-1 were also found in the present study strains which involved in virulence and stress response of bacteria. The above mentioned four virulence genes were also identified from strains of E. faecalis isolated from other sources32,35,36.
Many pathogenic bacteria conserve capsular polysaccharide encoding genes to evade phagocytosis and contribute a significant role for pathogenesis through immune evasion. Capsule producing genes were also harbored in all strains of the current study. Similar results were reported from different strains of E. faecalis37. Genes encoded for capsular polysaccharides are also found in a number of fish pathogenic bacteria including cpsA from S. agalactiae38, cpsA, cpsB, cpsC, cpsD, cpsE and cpsF in the cps loci of S. parauberi39.
Enterococci are reported as resistant to a wide group of antimicrobial compounds. In the present study, multiple genes conferring to tetracycline resistance found in the strain BFPS6 revealed that the strain is highly resistant to the tetracycline group of antibiotics compared to the strains BFF1B1 and BFFF11. Multiple genes responsible for antimicrobial resistance found in the genome sequences of E. faecalis isolated from infected humans were recorded as resistant to four dominant groups of antibiotics including erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline and quinupristin/ dalfopristin18. Woods, et al.20 identified multidrug resistant E. faecalis including macrolide resistant genes lsa(A) and erm(B), tetracycline resistant genes, tet(M), tet(S), and tet(L), chloramphenicol resistance gene cat, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistant gene dfrG from a wide range of macaques (Macaca mulatta) samples. Multiple antibiotic-resistant genes were also reported from fish pathogenic Aeromonas sp. Sulfonamide-trimethoprim-resistant gene (aadA5) and trimethoprim resistantgenes (dfrA and dfrB) were identified from fish pathogen Aeromonas sp.40. De, et al.41 reported macrolide resistance gene mph(A), tetracycline resistant genes tet(A) and tet(E) and Beta-lactam resistant gene blaOXA-12 from A. veronii strain Ae52 isolated from goldfish in Japan.
Bacteria have the ability to transfer their antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes to other bacteria through the gene transfer mechanisms (i.e. transfer of plasmids or transposons elements and presence of bacteriophage). These may lead to complications for infection control by reducing the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment. In the case of bacteriophage analysis with PHASTER, no antibiotic-resistant genes were observed in the prophage regions among all three strains in the current study. Therefore, it is assumed that there is a low risk of transferring AMR to other bacteria. In the present study, BFPS6 conserved more virulence factors (Numbers) indicating that BFPS6 may be more virulent compared to the two other strains of E. faecalis.
Enterococci cause streptococcosis like disease in fish which may also cause by Streptococcus sp. and Lactococcus sp. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the E. faecalis strains isolated from fish formed clusters with the strains of E. faecalis isolated from other sources rather than the fish pathogenic Streptococcus sp. and Lactococcus sp. Furthermore, only very few virulent and antibiotic-resistance genes showed similarities among the different genera of bacteria associated with streptococcosis in fish.
Initially, it was believed that Streptococcus sp. and Lactococcus sp. are involved in streptococcosis infection in fish. Therefore, most of the previous studies were focused on the whole genome sequence of the fish pathogenic S. agalactiae29, S. iniae42, S. Parauberis39 and L. garvieae43. Recently, Enterococcus was highlighted as a causative agent for streptococcosis like infection in a different region of the world. Thus, it is necessary to explore the whole genome sequence of Enterococcus responsible for streptococcosis in fish to identify their genomic resemblances to the other species. Primarily, a deviation was observed relative to the distribution of virulence factors among different species linked to streptococcosis in fish from different geographical areas. Phenotypically similar strains of the same or different species differ in a certain set of virulence gene clusters. Although, Streptococcus sp. and Enterococcus sp. produce similar disease symptoms in fish, very few similarities are found in their virulence genes among species as well as the genera level. One of the important findings of this study is that all three-identified strains of Enterococcus showed a high level of virulence, although they were isolated from two different types of fish species.
In conclusion, whole-genome sequence (WGS) analysis revealed all aspects of genomic characteristics including virulent genes, antibiotic-resistant genes and other functional genes, different categories of proteins and transposable elements. This is one of the first studies that explore the WGS of E. faecalis strains isolated from streptococcosis infected fish. According to the virulence genes and antibiotic-resistance genes contents, all three strains appeared to be pathogenic. All three strains possess multidrug resistant genes and were resistant to the sixteen predominantly used antibiotics in aquaculture. Tetracycline resistance genes Tet(L), Tet(M), tet(S) and tet(45) were only found in the strain BFPS6. The findings of this study show a way of quick identification of virulence factors of streptococcosis in Nile tilapia so that essential preventive measures can be taken in time.
Methods
Bacterial strain selection and culture
We selected three fish pathogenic strains of E. faecalis isolated from diseased Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (BFF1B1 and BFFF11) and Thai sarpunti (Barbonymus gonionotus) (BFPS6) suffering from streptococcosis5,8. These strains were collected from three different locations of Bangladesh at different time point during summer season. The isolation and identification of bacteria were performed according to our previous work5,8. The strains were stored at −80 °C with 10% glycerol supplement in nutrient broth. Bacteria were routinely sub-cultured in nutrient broth (Liofilchem S.r.l., Via Scozia, Italy) and nutrient agar media (Hi Media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India) for 48 h.
DNA Extraction and whole-genome sequencing
The genomic DNA was extracted from the bacteria cultured in nutrient broth using the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania). The quality and quantity of the extracted DNA were determined by using a 0.8% agarose gel and a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The extracted gDNA were stored at −80 °C until whole-genome sequencing. The genome sequence was performed using a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, Inc.) according to Akter et al.19.
Assembly and annotation of raw reads
Initially, the bacteria were identified by using the Bacterial Analysis Pipeline version 1.0.444. The de novo assembly of the high-quality reads was performed into draft genomes with SPAdes version 3.9.045. The draft genomes of the bacteria were annotated by using Prokka software tools with version 1.11.046 and PATRIC, a RASTtk-enabled Genome Annotation Service47. Functional annotation of predicted protein was evaluated using BLASTKOALA of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (https://www.kegg.jp/blastkoala/)48. The predicted genes by KEGG functional annotation were constructed with ggplot2 using R statistical package version 3.2.3.
Genomic comparison
The shared and unique genes among the three strains of E. faecalis were analyzed using an online database called RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (http://rast.nmpdr.org/rast.cgi)49. For the comparative study among the unique genes of these pathogens were obtained from the annotated genome in SEED Viewer (http://rast.nmpdr.org/seedviewer.cgi)49. Plasmid replicons for the genome sequences were studied by using PlasmidFinder (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/) with the setting of the threshold for a minimum 95% identity over 60% coverage of length50. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were analyzed by using the Antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell V 5.1.2 (antiSMASH, https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/#!/start)51.
Identification of prophage associated Gene clusters in the genome sequences of the strains were identified using PHASTER server (http://phaster.ca/) 52. Three scenarios for the completeness of the predicted phage-associated regions were defined according to how many genes/proteins of a known phage the region contained: intact (≥ 90%), questionable (90–60%), and incomplete (≤ 60%). The comparative genomic feature was visualized using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) version 0.95 with E. faecalis V583 (Accession No AE016830) as reference53. Further, the ISfinder database (http://www-is.biotoul. fr/is.html) were used to identify the insertion sequences (IS) of the study bacteria54.
Assembly and identification of virulence gene
The virulence genes were identified in the de novo assembled contigs of the E. faecalis strains using the web-service VirulenceFinder 2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/VirulenceFinder/) and VFanalyzer of virulence factor database (VFDB, http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/)55 and Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) 3.4.256 and more than 90% subject coverage and query coverage were used to select the virulence genes. For the Virulence Finder identification thresholds were set 90% over a minimum identity length of 60%. The heat maps were constructed based on the presence and absence of virulence genes in the respective strains and according to the database used to identify the genes by R software.
Identification of antibiotic-resistance gene
Antibiotic-resistance genes in whole-genome sequence data were identified by using an online-based database named ResFinder 3.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/)57, Antibiotic-resistance Gene-ANNOTation V6 (ARG-ANNOT, https://ifr48.timone.univ-mrs.fr/blast/arg-annot_v6.html)58, Comprehensive Antibiotic-resistance Database CARD (CARD, https://card.mcmaster.ca/analyze/rgi)59 and PATRIC 3.4.256. The acquired antimicrobial resistance genes of all of the strains were identified using 90% nucleotide identity for ResFinder.
Analysis of Phylogenetic tree
A Phylogenetic tree was constructed based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis using the web-tool CSI Phylogeny v1.2 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/CSIPhylogeny/) 60. The phylogenetic tree was modified in FigTree v1.4.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). As an output of the analysis, a matrix including the counts of nucleotides difference for all sequences was obtained. A reference sequence alignment (Accession No. AE016830) was used to generate a phylogenetic tree from the whole-genome sequence data of the strains of the present study including some other sequences obtained from the NCBI database. The SNP tree server allows setting few input parameters to filter SNPs and the default values were used according to Kaas et al.60.
Data availability
The whole-genome sequence data of BFFF11, BFF1B1 and BFPS6 have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Bank under accession numbers CP045918, CP046022 and JADBGH010000000, respectively.
References
John, P., Henriksson, G., Belton, B., Jahan, K. M.-E. & Rico, A. Measuring the potential for sustainable intensification of aquaculture in Bangladesh using life cycle assessment. 115, 2958–2963, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716530115 (2018).
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. (2018).
Naylor, R. L. et al. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature 591, 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6 (2021).
Garza, M., Mohan, C. V., Rahman, M., Wieland, B. & Hasler, B. The role of infectious disease impact in informing decision-making for animal health management in aquaculture systems in Bangladesh. Prev. Vet. Med. 167, 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.03.004 (2019).
Akter, T. et al. Involvement of Enterococcus species in streptococcosis of Nile tilapia in Bangladesh. Aquaculture 531, 735790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735790 (2021).
Dong, H. T. et al. Naturally concurrent infections of bacterial and viral pathogens in disease outbreaks in cultured Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farms. Aquaculture 448, 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.027 (2015).
Soto, E. et al. Edwardsiella ictaluri as the causative agent of mortality in cultured Nile Tilapia. 24, 81-90, https://doi.org/10.1080/08997659.2012.675931 (2012).
Ehsan, R. et al. Enterococcus faecalis involved in streptococcosis like infection in silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus). Aquacult Rep 21, 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100868 (2021).
Mishra, A. et al. Current challenges of streptococcus infection and effective molecular, cellular, and environmental control methods in aquaculture. Mol. Cells 41, 495–505. https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2018.2154 (2018).
Kusuda, R., Kawai, K., Salati, F., Banner, C. R. & Fryer, J. L. Enterococcus seriolicida sp. nov., a fish pathogen. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41, 406–409. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-41-3-406 (1991).
Morita, H. et al. Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the fish pathogen Lactococcus garvieae. PLoS ONE 6, e23184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023184 (2011).
Arumugam, U., Stalin, N. & Rebecca, G. P. Isolation, molecular identification and antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus faecalis from diseased tilapia. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.016 (2017).
Osman, K. M., Al-maary, K. S., Mubarak, A. S., Dawoud, T. M. & Moussa, I. M. I. Characterization and susceptibility of streptococci and enterococci isolated from Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) showing septicaemia in aquaculture and wild sites in. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1289-8 (2017).
Rahman, M. et al. Molecular identification of multiple antibiotic resistant fish pathogenic Enterococcus faecalis and their control by medicinal herbs. Sci. Rep. 7, 3747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03673-1 (2017).
Beceiro, A., Tomas, M. & Bou, G. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: A successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world?. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26, 185–230. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00059-12 (2013).
Cabello, F. C. et al. Antimicrobial use in aquaculture re-examined: Its relevance to antimicrobial resistance and to animal and human health. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 1917–1942. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12134 (2013).
Beukers, A. G. et al. Comparative genomics of Enterococcus spp. isolated from bovine feces. BMC Microbiol. 17, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0962-1 (2017).
Farman, M. et al. Genomic analysis of multidrug-resistant clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates for antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors from the western region of Saudi Arabia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect Control 8, 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0508-4 (2019).
Akter, T., Rahman, M. M., Tay, A. C. Y., Ehsan, R. & Islam, M. T. Whole-genome sequence of fish-pathogenic Enterococcus faecalis strain BFFF11. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 9, e01447-e11419. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.01447-19 (2020).
Woods, S. E. et al. Characterization of multi-drug resistant enterococcus faecalis isolated from cephalic recording chambers in research macaques (Macaca spp.). PLoS ONE 12, e0169293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169293 (2017).
Hashem, Y. A., Amin, H. M., Essam, T. M., Yassin, A. S. & Aziz, R. K. Biofilm formation in enterococci: Genotype-phenotype correlations and inhibition by vancomycin. Sci Rep 7, 5733. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05901-0 (2017).
Mohamed, J. A. & Huang, D. B. Biofilm formation by enterococci. 56, 1581-1588 (2007).
Ferrara, M., Haidukowski, M., Logrieco, A. F., Leslie, J. F. & Mule, G. A CRISPR-Cas9 system for genome editing of Fusarium proliferatum. Sci Rep 9, 19836. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56270-9 (2019).
Bourgogne, A., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Dunny, G. M. & Murray, B. E. Comparison of OG1RF and an isogenic fsrB deletion mutant by transcriptional analysis: The Fsr system of Enterococcus faecalis is more than the activator of gelatinase and serine protease. J. Bacteriol. 188, 2875–2884. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.188.8.2875-2884.2006 (2006).
Kawalec, M., Potempa, J., Moon, J. L., Travis, J. & Murray, B. E. Molecular diversity of a putative virulence factor: purification and characterization of isoforms of an extracellular serine glutamyl endopeptidase of Enterococcus faecalis with different enzymatic activities. 187, 266-275, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.1.266-275.2005 (2005).
Massidda, O. et al. The PBP 5 synthesis repressor (psr) gene of Enterococcus hirae ATCC 9790 is substantially longer than previously reported. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166, 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13912.x (1998).
Wen, Z. T., Bitoun, J. P., Liao, S. & Abranches, J. Influence of BrpA and Psr on cell Envelope Homeostasis and Virulence of Streptococcus Mutans. Stress and Environmental Regulation of Gene Expression and Adaptation in Bacteria, 1043–1054 (2016).
Bhat, S. A. et al. Isolation, molecular detection and antibiogram of Listeria monocytogenes from human clinical cases and fish of Kashmir India. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 22, 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-012-1462-1 (2012).
Kayansamruaj, P., Pirarat, N., Kondo, H., Hirono, I. & Rodkhum, C. Genomic comparison between pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from Nile tilapia in Thailand and fish-derived ST7 strains. Infect Genet. Evol. 36, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.10.009 (2015).
Soto-Rodriguez, S. A. et al. Virulence of the fish pathogen Aeromonas dhakensis: Genes involved, characterization and histopathology of experimentally infected hybrid tilapia. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 129, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03247 (2018).
Qin, X., Singh, K. V., Weinstock, G. M. & Murray, B. E. Effects of Enterococcus faecalis fsr genes on production of gelatinase and a serine protease and virulence. Infect Immun. 68, 2579–2586. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.5.2579-2586.2000 (2000).
Maadani, A., Fox, K. A., Mylonakis, E. & Garsin, D. A. Enterococcus faecalis mutations affecting virulence in the Caenorhabditis elegans model host. Infect Immun. 75, 2634–2637 (2007).
Buchmeier, N. A. et al. DNA repair is more important than catalase for Salmonella virulence in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 95, 1047–1053 (1995).
Buchmeier, N. A., Lipps, C. J., So, M. Y. & Heffron, F. Recombination-deficient mutants of Salmonella typhimurium are avirulent and sensitive to the oxidative burst of macrophages. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 933–936 (1993).
Aakra, A. G. et al. Transcriptional response of Enterococcus faecalis V583 to erythromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 2246–2259 (2005).
Garsin, D. A. et al. A simple model host for identifying Gram-positive virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 10892–10897 (2001).
Thurlow, L. R., Thomas, V. C. & Hancock, L. E. Capsular polysaccharide production in Enterococcus faecalis and contribution of CpsF to capsule serospecificity. J. Bacteriol. 191, 6203–6210. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00592-09 (2009).
Kayansamruaj, P., Pirarat, N., Katagiri, T., Hirono, I. & Rodkhum, C. Molecular characterization and virulence gene profiling of pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae populations from tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) farms in Thailand. 26, 488–495, https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638714534237 (2014).
Torres-Corral, Y. & Santos, Y. Comparative genomics of Streptococcus parauberis: new target for molecular identification of serotype III. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 6211–6222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10683-z (2020).
Kadlec, K. et al. Molecular basis of sulfonamide and trimethoprim resistance in fish-pathogenic Aeromonas isolates. 77, 7147-7150, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00560-11 (2011).
De, S. J. S. S., Honein, K., Arulkanthan, A., Ushio, H. & Asakawa, S. Genome sequencing and annotation of Aeromonas veronii strain Ae52, a multidrug-resistant isolate from septicaemic gold fish (Carassius auratus) in Sri Lanka. Genom. Data 11, 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2016.11.011 (2017).
Alsheikh-Hussain, A. S. et al. Complete genome sequence and comparative genomics of the fish pathogen Streptococcus iniae, https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.17.880476 (2020).
Aguado-Urda, M. et al. Genome sequence of Lactococcus garvieae 8831, isolated from rainbow trout lactococcosis outbreaks in Spain. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4263–4264. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.05326-11 (2011).
Larsen, M. V. et al. Benchmarking of methods for genomic taxonomy. 52, 1529 LP - 1539, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02981-13 (2014).
Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 (2012).
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 (2014).
Brettin, T. et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 5, 8365. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08365 (2015).
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D457-462. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1070 (2016).
Overbeek, R. et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). 42, D206-D214, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1226 (2014)
Carattoli, A. et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using plasmidfinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 3895–3903. https://doi.org/10.1128/Aac.02412-14 (2014).
Medema, M. H. et al. antiSMASH: Rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. 39, W339-W346, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr466 (2011).
Arndt, D. et al. PHASTER: A better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W16-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw387 (2016).
Alikhan, N. F., Petty, N. K., Ben Zakour, N. L. & Beatson, S. A. BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12, 402. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-402 (2011).
Siguier, P., Perochon, J., Lestrade, L., Mahillon, J. & Chandler, M. ISfinder: The reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences.34, 32-36, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj014 (2006).
Liu, B., Zheng, D., Jin, Q., Chen, L. & Yang, J. VFDB 2019: A comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D687–D692. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1080 (2019).
Wattam, A. R. et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D535–D542 (2017).
Zankari, E. et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2640–2644. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks261 (2012).
Gupta, S. K. et al. ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01310-13 (2014).
McArthur, A. G. et al. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 3348–3357. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00419-13 (2013).
Kaas, R. S., Leekitcharoenphon, P., Aarestrup, F. M. & Lund, O. Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms. PLoS ONE 9, e104984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104984 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Bangladesh Academy of Sciences for providing the major financial support for this work under the project “Identification of virulence genes involved in streptococcosis in tilapia and development of prevention measure against the disease” (project number BAS-USDA-PALS-FI-25).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: M.M.R. and T.A.; Data curation: T.A., A.C.Y.T., R. E. and S.I.P.; Data processing and analysis: T.A., and M.N.H.; Methodology and laboratory work: T.A., R. E. and S.I.P.; Funding acquisition and project administration: M.M.R.; Resources: M.M.R., A.C.Y.T., and T.I.; Supervision: M.M.R. and T.A; Data validation: M.M.R., T.A., M.N.H., M.J.F. and T.I.; Writing original draft: T.A.; review and editing: M.M.R., M.N.H, M.J.F. and T.I.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Akter, T., Haque, M.N., Ehsan, R. et al. Virulence and antibiotic-resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis associated with streptococcosis disease in fish. Sci Rep 13, 1551 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25968-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25968-8
This article is cited by
-
Prediction of anastomotic insufficiency based on the mucosal microbiome prior to colorectal surgery: a proof-of-principle study
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Effect of Enterococcus faecalis infection on some immune parameters, immune genes expression and tissue pathology of Argyrosomus regius
Aquaculture International (2024)
-
Unravelling the genomic secrets of bacterial fish pathogens: a roadmap to aquaculture sustainability
Molecular Biology Reports (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.