Abstract
DNA methylation is a key epigenetic modification to regulate gene expression in mammalian cells. Abnormal DNA methylation in gene promoters is common across human cancer types. DNMT3B is the main de novo methyltransferase enhanced in several primary tumors. How de novo methylation is established in genes related to cancer is poorly understood. CpG islands (CGIs), common sequences, and transcription factors (TFs) that interact with DNMT3B have been associated with abnormal de novo methylation. We initially identified cis elements associated with DNA methylation to investigate the contribution of DNMT3B overexpression to the deregulation of its possible target genes in an epithelial cell model. In a set of downregulated genes (n = 146) from HaCaT cells with DNMT3B overexpression, we found CGI, common sequences, and TFs Binding Sites that interact with DNMT3B (we called them P-down-3B). PPL1, VAV3, IRF1, and BRAF are P-down-3B genes that are downregulated and increased their methylation in DNMT3B presence. Together these findings suggest that methylated promoters aberrantly have some cis elements that could conduce de novo methylation by DNMT3B.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
DNA methylation in a CpG context is a key epigenetic process that regulated gene expression. DNA methylation consists of a chemical addition of a methyl group on the fifth carbon in cytosines. In a structural sense in the genome, regions with extensive CpG contain, called CGIs exist. The CGIs have an average size of 1 kb, and a CpG content > 60% and they are prevalently found in promoter regions1. Cytosine methylation increases the contained information in the genetic sequence, in this sense, the same sequence might be read differentially and participate in the on/off switch from specific genes2. CpGs methylation in humans is deposited by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) enzymes3. DNMT1 is a maintenance DNMT and establishes DNA methylation in hemimethylated substrates, mainly, during DNA replication, and is abundant in somatic cells. DNMT3A and DNMT3B are de novo DNMTs that establish DNA methylation in hemimethylated and unmethylated substrates and their levels of expression are higher in embryonic cells4,5,6. DNA methylation has been proposed to regulate gene expression during development and maintain fate cells, but deregulation of any of the 3 catalytically active methyltransferases in embryonic or somatic cells, leads to aberrant gene expression and results in human diseases7,8. De novo methylation is predominantly established by DNMT3A and DNMT3B, although both share function and similar targets, there are specific target regions and genes for each of them9, different functional mechanisms10,11, differential functional results in the same context12 and, there are different expression profiles in cancer for each of DNMTs13. In several solid tumors, DNMT3B is upregulated, correlates with the epigenetic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, and increases the number and volume of tumors14. The human genome is segmented in biological cis regulatory elements (promoters, enhancers, CGIs, TFBS, and others), which are a key class of regulatory noncoding DNA sequences, which act to regulate the transcription of a neighboring gene15. The direct regulation of DNMT3B over their target genes has been sparsely tested but exist reports of cis elements related to de novo methylation as CGIs, TFs, and common motifs of methylated promoters. These elements have been found in genes that are downregulated by DNMT3B.
The CpG content on the human promoters has a critical role in DNA methylation in somatic cells. Commonly, promoters with high content of CpG (HCP) are sparsely methylated and are expressed. Promoters with intermediate content of CpGs are dynamically methylated, and their transcriptional state is regulated via methylation depending on the tissue, state of differentiation, and cell cycle. Promoters with low content of CpGs (LCP) are methylated and their target genes are repressed transcriptionally16,17. The CpG context in cancer becomes relevant for the establishment of abnormal methylation patterns by DNMTs, there is DNA methylation gain in CpG rich regions or CGIs18. When the DNMT3B expression is increased, also is enhanced de novo methylation19, DNMT3B preferential binding, and its enzymatic activity in CGIs20,21.
De novo methylation has been related to the information contained in the own cis sequences and has been reported that sequences adjacent to CpG are involved in the affinity of the human DNMTs for de novo methylation22,23,24. DNA methylation deposited by DNMT3B has been observed on the CANAGCTG sequence (N, any nucleotide)25. Analysis de novo motifs elucidation for the methylated regions by DNMT3B showed an enrichment of the thymine residue in position − 1 and guanine residue in position + 1 in the motif found for these regions, NTCpGGN26. The guanine presence in the + 1 of CpG preferred by DNMT3B was recently confirmed by biochemical assays where specific amino acids (Asn779 and Lys777) of the DNMT3B catalytic domain are involved27. The CGIs are considered biologically active motifs and platforms for the recruitment of chromatin-modifying proteins that facilitate transcription regulation. In the CGIs, we found many TFBS, and some of them are transcription repressor factors. There are several TFs that interact with DNMTs and regulate target genes28,29,30,31. RASSF1A is a gene that can be regulated by DNMT3B via DNA methylation in cancer. Myc is a TF associated with oncogenic functions and has been described as favoring the recruitment of DNMT3B to the RASSF1A promoter, which results in its epigenetic silencing and improves its function as a tumor suppressor32. Also, in prostate cancer, REX1 overexpression recruits DNMT3B and downregulates RASSF1A by promoter methylation33.
There is evidence for the overexpression of DNMT3B and its correlation with the epigenetic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes34. Several key genes for cell normality have been found methylated, and interestingly, DNMT3B in the mouse colon initiates de novo methylation of genes that are like genes that become methylated in human colon cancer. In the previous work, they suggest that a possible explanation for this similarity is that aberrant methylation in cancer can be attributed to the targeting of specific sequences rather than random methylation35. Additionally, in cancer, has been found that DNMT3B overexpression contributes to a hypermethylator phenotype36.
To gain knowledge about DNMT3B overexpression and downregulated genes, we focus on common elements, function, expression, and methylation statuses in a gene set. We identified cis elements in this gene set downregulated by DNMT3B overexpression in HaCaT cells. We select specifically four genes with cis elements and found decreased expression and promoter methylated in PPL1, VAV3, IRF1, and BRAF. Taken together, our data suggest that an abnormal increase of DNMT3B conduces to aberrant de novo methylation and this event can be influenced by cis elements found in possible DNMT3B target genes.
Results
Genes downregulated by DNMT3B overexpression have common cis elements
Our workgroup previously generated a DNMT3B overexpression model in HaCaT cells. Through an expression microarray, we found 252 downregulated genes by DNMT3B overexpression with a z-score of 2 to 6.837. In possible DNMT3B targets genes with decreased expression, our first goal was the identification of cis elements that can influence de novo methylation. Due to the repressor function of DNMT3B and the CpG-context influence on de novo methylation, we first identified genes with CGI as a possible element involved in DNMT3B targeting downregulated genes. Through three algorithms, we found 146/252 genes with CpG islands in their promoter region. These CGIs have an observed/expected ratio > 0.6 and a CpG average greater than 50% (Fig. 1a).
DNMT3B overexpression led to abnormal methylation in genes with key roles in the biological normal process38,39. To know the processes which are involved in the downregulated genes with CGI, we made a gene ontology (GO) and Panther pathway analysis. According to GO, the genes participate in the cell cycle, senescence, MAPK cascade, PI3K regulation, apoptosis, and others (Fig. 1b). In KEGG analysis, the downregulated genes were found in cancer pathways, MAPK and ErbB signaling, melanoma, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer, etcetera (Fig. 1c).
In addition to the CGIs, has been described that in some promoters, the recruitment of DNMTs might be directed by interaction with TFs32. We question if downregulated genes (with CGI) might have binding sites for TFs that interact directly with DNMT3B. We found in the literature 47 TFs that shape complex with DNMT3B (Fig. 1d, left)40. Bioinformatic analysis was performed with ALIBABA 2.0, Expasy (EPD), and genome browser data for the binding sites identification of TFs on the regulatory sequences of DNMT3B downregulated genes (Fig. 1d, left). We found 18/47 TFBSs previously reported with DNMT3B interaction (TFs DNMT3B-partners) in the promoters of analyzed genes. We found binding sites for TF as SP1, EGR-1, ER, GATA-1, GR, c-JUN y YY1, in 120 to 146 selected genes. Binding sites for ATF, CREB, ELK1, c-FOS y MYC, that bond to 107 to 77/146 genes, and some TFs with scarce binding sites; E2F, HOXA5, HNF4, MEF2 y PPAR that are found in 2 to 23 genes (Fig. 1d, right). The downregulated genes by DNMT3B overexpression with CpG islands and TFBS were named P-down-3B genes.
Hitherto, possible binding sequences have been reported for DNMT3A or DNMT3B in particular contexts. These sequences are found in methylated promoters in presence of DNMT3A or DNMT3B25. We believe that might there are sequences in the downregulated genes that reflect preference by DNMT3B. Therefore, we perform motif analysis with MEME Suite to identify common motifs in P-down-3B genes. We search motifs in three functional regions from P-down-3B genes; the regulatory region −2000 to 1000 (RR), the CpG island (CGI), and de closely promoter (−400 to 100, (PROMOTER)). The short and ungapped motif elicitation showed several common motifs between the 3 functional regions. We show two short representative motifs highly like each other (Fig. 2a,b). The discovery of novel and ungapped motifs showed a large common motif in the RR, CGI, and Promoter (Fig. 2c). The comprehensive motif analysis in Human 5-methylcytosine for transcription factor binding to methylated DNA show a similar motif in P-down-3B genes (Fig. 2d). These possible preferentially sequences for DNMT3B were analyzed in the146 P-down-3B genes and were found in at least 80% of them.
DNMT3B overexpression is common in cancer patients from TCGA data sets
Next, we examined whether DNMT3B expression is increased in cancer patients. We interrogate the DNMT3B levels and disease-free survival in cancer patients in TCGA data sets. DNMT3B is overexpressed significantly in six representative epithelial human solids tumors (BLCA, CESC, ESCA, HNSC, LUSC, and UCEC) concerning normal tissue (Fig. 3a). The survival analysis results from Kaplan–Meier plots depicted the association between DNMT3B levels expression and cancer prognosis; high DNMT3B expression in representative tumors is significantly associated with poor prognosis (Fig. 3b). The same six human tumors were interrogated for DNMT3A levels expression. We found that no there are significant changes in expression in 4/6 cancer samples concerning normal tissue and no significant association was found for the prognosis with respect to DNMT3A expression levels (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 1).
PPL1, VAV3, BRAF, and IRF1 have cis elements, gain methylation, and decrease their expression by DNMT3B overexpression
We next examined some key downregulated genes selected by cis elements (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 2) and their function in cancer-related processes. We screen the specific transcriptional and methylation state for PPL1, VAV3, BRAF, and IRF1. We wanted to know if these genes decrease their expression and if they gain methylation in HaCaT cells with DNMT3B overexpression. Then, we analyzed the expression of VAV3, PPL1, BRAF, and IRF1 by RT-qPCR and found a decreased expression in the mRNA of these genes (Fig. 4a). The expression of these genes also was decreased in HaCaT cells with endogenous activation and stable expression of DNMT3B (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 3). Consequently, we investigate whether the decreased expression in PPL1, BRAF, and IRF1 was due to the gain of methylation in its promoter. We found that in HaCaT cells with DNMT3B overexpression, PPL1, BRAF, and IRF1 gain methylation concerning control HaCaT cells (Fig. 4b). For VAV3, a gain of methylation was previously identified in 2 regions of the VAV3 promoter determined by bisulfite modification and sequencing37. To complement the methylation assays, we next conducted experiments with 5-aza-2´-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) in HaCaT cells with DNMT3B overexpression. The decreased expression of VAV3, PPL1 e IRF1 by DNMT3B overexpression was restored by the treatment with 1 µM, 3 µM, and 5 µM of 5-aza-dC (Fig. 5).
DNMT3B overexpression increase cell migration in HaCaT cells
To highlight the general findings associated with the DNMT3B overexpression that involves several genes and key pathways, we select a common biological process de-regulated in cancer, cell migration. We performed a wound closure assay in control and with DNMT3B overexpression HaCaT cells. We observe a significant increase in cell migration at 24 h with the DNMT3B overexpression concerning control HaCaT cells (Fig. 6a). The quantification of the wound closure showed that DNMT3B overexpression result in a close area of 78% with respect to 35% in control cells (Fig. 6b).
Discussion
Genes aberrantly silenced by DNMTs overexpression have a negative impact on cell normality. Abnormal methylation patterns in key genes lead to carcinogenic programs in somatic cells41. DNMT3B is a key de novo DNMT and its binding at the genome is closely linked to methylation deposition in several functional regions, for example, enhancers12, bodies of transcribed genes20, intragenic regions42, and promoters43,44,45,46,47,48,49 with different functional consequence. The promoter’s methylation in CGIs is related to gene transcriptional silencing whereas that intragenic methylation is related to gene activation and influences gene isoform mRNA length50,51,52. DNMT3B targets genes in the cancer context and have been described to contain some cis elements associated with DNA methylation. In the genomic structural sense, we investigate common cis elements in downregulated genes by DNMT3B overexpression and in the functional sense, we evaluated the methylation and expression status of four cancer-related genes and the impact of DNMT3B in a key biological process in cancer.
In this work, we identified that DNMT3B downregulated genes with CGIs in their regulatory region (146 genes), TFBS associated with DNMTs recruitment, and common sequences (Figs. 1 and 2). DNMTs family doesn´t have binding sites in the genome but can be guided to target sites through methylation-prone sequences such as CGIs. The information about the CGIs and CpG content has been successfully used as a predictor of DNA methylation levels in gene promoters. Particularly, DNMT3B preferentially binds to highly repeated heterochromatic regions rich in CpG53,54,55. Taking the evidence together, we believe that DNMT3B´s preference for genes with CGIs could be increased in some diseases where DNMT3B is de-regulated, for example during carcinogenesis56. CGIs hypermethylation associated with DNMT3B has been found to increase in cancer and consequently, the methylation of genes with CGI is enhanced19,57,58.
The CGIs, being adjacent or within promoters, are also binding platforms for TFs. The methylation of binding sites can favor or prevent the TFs recruitment at their target promoters and consequently regulate the transcription rates59. Additionally, some oncogenic TFs complex with DNMTs position themselves on target genes and silence them32,60,61. In the literature, there are reports of direct interaction between TFs and DNMT3B, which we found in P-down-3B binding sites for 18 TFs (Fig. 1d). In protein–protein interaction, microarrays found several TFs that interact with DNMTs40 and demonstrated that are canonical regulators of the expression of their target genes through DNMT3B recruitment and DNA methylation. In HCC cells, the expression of FOXO1 is repressed by the interaction between FOXM1, RB1, and DNMT3B62. Another example is the ZEB1 TF that interacts with DNMT3B, and the consequence is Ddr1 promoter hypermethylation63. In breast cancer cells, TBX2 recruits to DNMT3B and other repressor proteins around the NDRG1 proximal promoter64. The occupancy by DNMT3B in the HCT116 genome is modulated to subset genes targets of ZBTB24, involved in general cellular maintenance, and coordinately maintains DNA methylation within gene bodies65.
Commonly, most proteins that interact with DNA are guided by specific binding sequences. In this sense, some proteins of the methylation cascade such as DNMT3A and TET1 have been reported motif binding in studies of interaction DNA–protein66,67. In this study, we found common sequences shared between P-down-3B genes (Fig. 2). To retrieve the information contained in the cis sequence, the promoter region, the CpG islands, and the extensive regulatory region of the P-down-3B were scanned separately. In agreement with our results, short common motifs have been reported in methylated promoters by DNMTs overexpression25,26 and structural-function assays showed the preference of DNMT3B by CpG with a G in + 1 position27,68 similar to found on the complementary strand of Fig. 2b motif. We found a large and highly conserved motif in P-down-CGI independently of the analyzed region (Fig. 2c). The motifs shown in Fig. 2a and Fig. 2d have interesting changes between cytosine/thymine and the abundant presence of only thymine residues, respectively. An explanation for this is that the 5mC is propense to deamination to become thymine, causing C-to-T transitions69. Also, the CpG loss is frequently in promoters methylated as a consequence of transitions of methylated cytosines to thymine70. The cis elements, particularly the cis sequence of a promoter, contain the information necessary for DNA methylation establishment71. Additional experiments are necessary to validate the direct implication of these cis elements in the DNA methylation performed by DNMT3B.
DNMT3B is the main de novo methyltransferase overexpressed in different types of cancer and has been described as necessary for tumor development13,14,72,73,74. With a general approach, we explore a little about the frequency of DNMT3B dysregulation in tumors of epithelial origin. In a data set from TCGA, we see that DNMT3B is the main de Novo methyltransferase overexpressed in epithelial carcinomas (6/6) with respect to DNMT3A (2/6) (Fig. 3 and Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). This can be suggesting that abnormal DNA methylation in these carcinomas is a partial result of DNMT3B contribution and high DNMT3B levels are related to poor prognosis (Fig. 3b). The global DNA methylation added by DNMT3B reflects its importance in cancer and is equally important to know specific genes downregulated by DNMT3B methylation. GST with CGIs in its promoters aren´t generally methylated16, but there is a change in methylation patterns during carcinogenesis75, and the circumstances or elements that determine it are poorly understood. DNMT3B has several target genes in cancer, including oncogenes and tumor suppressors. In leukemias, the absence or decrease of DNMT3B is an event that favors the malign transformation76,77 and has target genes such as C-met78. Nevertheless, is most frequently reported that DNMT3B overexpression is closely linked to the silencing of tumor suppressor genes in several tumors38,39,79,80,81. Hitherto, don’t have been reported that the DNMT3B binding in promoters results in an increased gene expression if not quite the opposite, hence, we focus on four downregulated genes with cis elements and functionally related to cancer, PPL1, IRF1, BRAF, and VAV3. These genes possess common cis elements in abnormally methylated promoters (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 2). We found that these genes decrease their expression by DNMT3B increasing and gaining methylation in their promoters’ regions (Fig. 4). Additionally, the levels of expression of these genes were rescued with 5-aza-dC treatment (Fig. 5). PPL1 is a scaffold protein involved in desmosome junctions and keratin filaments in differentiated epithelial cells82. PPL1 was reported scarcely expressed in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)83, and esophageal cancer84. Loss expression of PPL1 in ESCC is associated with hypermethylation and PPL1 induction promoted adhesion and delayed cell migration85. BRAF is a gene that codifies for a serine/threonine kinase and is commonly mutated in cancer86. It has been linked to the active BRAF protein with the silencing of MLH1, which produces instability in microsatellite regions and hypermutable phenotype87. The interferon 1 regulatory factor (IRF1) participates in the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the mediation of antiviral, immunomodulatory, and antiproliferative effects88. IRF1 has been identified as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer89. VAV3 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor involved in the regulation of Rho GTPases and various cellular processes. VAV3 gene has been reported methylated in breast cancer and gastric cancer90,91. The gain of methylation and consequently loss of expression of these genes could be associated with a deregulation of their canonical process during carcinogenesis. We are aware that finer experiments are necessary to corroborate these possible DNMT3B target genes. The studies with a wide approach on DNMT3B specific targets in human cancer are limited and most of them are made in human stem cells and animal models. We re-analyzed RNA-Seq data from Human Epidermal Stem Cells (EpSC) with DNMT3B depletion12. In these data, we found that PPL1 and IRF1 increase their expression in EpSC with si-DNMT3B (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 4). In another study made in the H1 hESC line92, the DNMT3B peaks are distributed in different regions of the genome (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 5a) and the identification of nearest genes to DNMT3B peaks showed that 57/146 genes with CGI from our work were found near from DNMT3B peaks, included IRF1, BRAF, VAV3, and PPL1. On other hand, only found 23/100 genes downregulated without CGI in the genes set with DNMT3B peaks (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 5b). In these peaks, we found 6/18 TFs (Supplementary File 2, Supplementary Fig. 5c) identified on the regulatory sequence from downregulated genes by DNMT3B (Fig. 1d). We are aware that these experiments were performed in stem cells and reflect the methylation landscape set up by DNMT3B in cells where it has high levels of expression relative to differentiated cells. In the context of cancer, it has been reported that embryonic or undifferentiated cells have similarities to cancer cells93. Although they should be taken with caution, the coincidences found to reflect strong similarities between what was found in HaCaT cells with DNMT3B overexpression and what was reported in stem cell models. The P-down-3B genes were found involved in several key signaling pathways downregulated in cancer (Fig. 1b,c), and some of them impact processes such as cell migration. We found that the DNMT3B overexpression increased the migration in HaCaT cells (Fig. 6). The role of DNMT3B in this process was also observed in bladder cancer upon DNMT3B knockdown inhibited migration and invasion48,94. Our results suggest that the DNMT3B overexpression is enough to downregulate several genes. These genes are involved in the process closely related cancer and have cis elements associated with gain de novo methylation in promoters.
Cancer cell lines are good study models for investigation of the heterogenous factors that contributed to a specific cancer type, nevertheless, with immortalized keratinocytes model (HaCaT) we trying to emulate the onset stage and a first-line event in cancer, DNMT3B up-regulation. This model may explain aberrant CGI methylation in promoters. Our approach was downregulated genes with CGIs but is important to announce that DNMT3B overexpression also was related to the up-regulation of several genes. The methylation in intragenic CGIs51 is related to cell differentiation52,95, active transcription, and enrichment of histone modifications such as H3K36me350. We studied genes possibly related to the catalytic DNMT3B function, and a limitation of our study is that we can’t discriminate whether the change observed in all the deregulated genes is a catalytic or accessory function of DNMT3B96, we specifically tested the catalytic function in the 4 selected genes.
The line of evidence suggests that DNMTB overexpression leads to gene deregulation, which occurs in more than one type of cancer. An exhaustive exploration of those genes indistinctly methylated in more than one type of cancer is necessary. The cis elements can be studied further as possible predictors of abnormal gene methylation.
Conclusion
In this study, we describe some cis elements that were found in downregulated genes by DNMT3B overexpression. The most common element in these genes was the CGI, followed by the common motifs and TFBS. The presence of all or some of these elements could suggest a predisposition of certain regions to gain methylation in abnormal contexts. Genes with cis elements in this work are decreased and gain methylation by DNMT3B overexpression. The global role of DNMT3B impacts key biological processes such as cell migration.
Methods
Cell culture
The HaCaT immortalized human keratinocyte cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). HaCaT were grown in DMEM/F12 1: 1 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAA Laboratories GmbH, Austria), 100 U/mL of penicillin (Penprocilin 800,000 U, Lakeside, Mexico) and 100 µg/mL of streptomycin (Sulfestrep, Pisa Laboratories, Mexico). The cells were grown at 37 °C in presence of 5% CO2.
Expression systems
We use the construction pCDNA3.1-DNMT3B generated by Peralta-Arrieta et al., 2017a). ~ 25 × 103 HaCaT cells were transfected with 3.5 μg of pcDNA3.1-DNMT3B or 3.5 μg de pCDNA3.1(+) using lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Lipofectamine, 2000 Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After 48 h pos-transfección, the HaCaT cells were harvested for RNA (Direct-Zol RNA miniprep, ZymoResearch) and DNA (Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification, Promega Madison, USA) extraction.
The HaCaT with stable expression of DNMT3B was generated by the dCAS9 system. For the design and evaluation of guide sequences for the CRISPR-Cas9 system, we used the CRISPOR software (http://crispor.tefor.net/). The human sequence of DNMT3B promoter was a user for guide design. Selected guide sequences had among the lowest off-target scores. Sequences for all guides used in this study are provided in Supplementary File 1, Supplementary Table 1. Oligonucleotides for guides were cloned into lentiSAM-v2 (Puro) (Addgene Plasmid #92,062). Plasmids were expanded and purified using a Qiagen MiniPrep kit prior to lentiviral transfection. We performed the transfection in HaCaT cells with sg-1/sg-2 (closer to TSS) and with sg-3/sg-4. Transfected cells were placed at 37 °C and 72 h after transfection cells were re-suspended in fresh medium supplemented with 5 μg/mL of Puromycin (Sigma) and transferred into a well of a 6-well plate. After 6 days (9 days post-transfection) an aliquot of cells was used for RNA extraction and the gene expression was quantified for RT-PCR.
Bioinformatic analysis: identification of CpG islands, Gene Ontology, consensus sequences of methylated promoters, and transcription factors binding sites
Previously, our laboratory group analyzed global expression genes (H35K microarray) in HaCaT cells with DNMT3B overexpression at 48 h37. We selected a list of 252 genes that decreased their expression with a z score of −2.0 to −6.8 in the H35K microarray. In these genes, we selected the regulatory region covering from −2000 to + 1000 bp relative to the transcription start site. The sequences of the genes were downloaded from the Eukaryotic promoter Database (https://epd.epfl.ch//index.php). CpG islands prediction was carried out with the MethPrimer program (https://www.urogene.org/cgi-bin/methprimer/methprimer.cgi). CGI). The criteria for considering a CpG island were a region > 300 bp, a percentage of GC above 50%, and an expected/observed ratio ≥ 0.6 analyzed in dbCGI (CpG island annotation tool). The consensus sequences analysis was made in downregulated genes with CpG islands in MEME Suite (Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation) (http://meme-suite.org/). All TFBS on the regulatory region of P-down-CGI were found with Alibaba 2.0 (http://gene-regulation.com/pub/programs/alibaba2/) and we overlap dates with transcription factors with experimental evidence of direct interaction with DNMT3B. We take genome browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu) information for the enrichment of transcription factors on the P-down-3B. GO analysis was performed with the Gene Functional Annotation Tool at the DAVID website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, version 6.8). Default parameters were used for the enrichment analysis for BP, cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). The resulting GO terms and the corresponding p-values were then processed using REVIGO to remove redundancy. The ten most significant BP categories were shown. Data mining. Data obtained from the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA; http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) database was utilized to analyze the mRNA expression level of DNMT3B in six cancer and normal cervical tissues. The association between a high and low DNMT3B mRNA expression with the overall survival (OS) of patients with cancer was analyzed by Kaplan‑Meier analysis, and the hazard ratio (HR) and log‑rank P‑value were also computed.
RNA extraction and Quantitative-RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from HaCaT cells transfected by 48 h with pCDNA3.1-DNMT3B or pCDNA3.1( +) by Trizol (Direct-Zol RNA miniprep, ZymoResearch). 100 ng total RNA was used for RT-qPCR with the kit KAPPA TM SYBR®FAST One-Step (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Primer sequences are shown in (Supplementary File 1, Supplementary Table 1).
Methylation specific PCR (MSP)
For MSP, 2 μg of DNA of HaCaT cells transfected with con pCDNA3.1-DNMT3B or pCDNA3.1( +) by 48 h were treated with an EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ kit (ZymoResearch, Irvine CA the USA). MSP primers are shown in Supplementary File 1, Supplementary Table 1 and were performed in a total of 10 µL, containing 1 µL of bisulfite-treated DNA, 250 nM of each primer, and AmpliTaq Gold360 Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA).
Wound healing assays
Control HaCaT cells and HaCaT cells with DNMT3B overexpression were grown until confluence on 60-mm culture dishes supplemented with DMEM/F12 as described earlier. Cells were starved for 24 h in DMEM/F12 without FBS and treated for 2 h with Cytosine β-D-Arabinofuranoside (AraC) to inhibit cell proliferation during the experiment. After starvation, cells were scratch-wounded using a sterile 200 μL pipette tip, suspended cells were removed by washing with PBS twice, and the cultures were re-fed with DMEM/F12. The progress of cell migration into the wound was monitored at 0 and 24 h using an Olympus BX43 microscope with a 10 × objective. The bottom of the plate was marked for reference, and the same field of the monolayers was photographed immediately after performing the wound (time = 0 h), and 24 h after treatments, five images per plate were analyzed. The distance between the edges of the wound was measured at times 0 and 24 h, and the reported migrated distance corresponds to the difference between these two. The migration area was determined by measuring the total area of the wound using the Image J software and the MRI wound-healing tool.
Data availability
All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files37. The datasets used in figures supplementary 4 and 5 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession numbers GSE65838 and GSE150072, respectively.
References
Gardiner-Garden, M. & Frommer, M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9 (1987).
Bestor, T. H., Edwards, J. R. & Boulard, M. Notes on the role of dynamic DNA methylation in mammalian development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6796–6799. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415301111 (2015).
Bestor, T. H. The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 2395–2402. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/9.16.2395 (2000).
Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A. & Li, E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99, 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81656-6 (1999).
Liao, J. et al. Targeted disruption of DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B in human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 47, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3258 (2015).
Hermann, A., Goyal, R. & Jeltsch, A. The Dnmt1 DNA-(cytosine-C5)-methyltransferase methylates DNA processively with high preference for hemimethylated target sites. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 48350–48359. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403427200 (2004).
Kanai, Y. & Hirohashi, S. Alterations of DNA methylation associated with abnormalities of DNA methyltransferases in human cancers during transition from a precancerous to a malignant state. Carcinogenesis 28, 2434–2442. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgm206 (2007).
Gu, J. et al. Mapping of variable DNA methylation across multiple cell types defines a dynamic regulatory landscape of the human genome. G3 (Bethesda) 6, 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.025437 (2016).
Yagi, M. et al. Identification of distinct loci for de novo DNA methylation by DNMT3A and DNMT3B during mammalian development. Nat. Commun. 11, 3199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16989-w (2020).
Norvil, A. B. et al. Dnmt3b methylates DNA by a noncooperative mechanism, and its activity is unaffected by manipulations at the predicted dimer interface. Biochemistry 57, 4312–4324. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00964 (2018).
Boyko, K. et al. Structure of the DNMT3B ADD domain suggests the absence of a DNMT3A-like autoinhibitory mechanism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 619, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.06.036 (2022).
Rinaldi, L. et al. Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b associate with enhancers to regulate human epidermal stem cell homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell 19, 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.020 (2016).
Mensah, I. K. et al. Misregulation of the expression and activity of DNA methyltransferases in cancer. NAR Cancer 3, zcab045. https://doi.org/10.1093/narcan/zcab045 (2021).
Linhart, H. G. et al. Dnmt3b promotes tumorigenesis in vivo by gene-specific de novo methylation and transcriptional silencing. Genes Dev. 21, 3110–3122. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1594007 (2007).
Wittkopp, P. J. & Kalay, G. Cis-regulatory elements: Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3095 (2011).
Saxonov, S., Berg, P. & Brutlag, D. L. A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1412–1417. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510310103 (2006).
Boukas, L., Bjornsson, H. T. & Hansen, K. D. Promoter CpG density predicts downstream gene loss-of-function intolerance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 107, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.07.014 (2020).
Costello, J. F. et al. Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns. Nat. Genet. 24, 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/72785 (2000).
Zhang, Y. et al. Targets and genomic constraints of ectopic Dnmt3b expression. Elife 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40757 (2018).
Baubec, T. et al. Genomic profiling of DNA methyltransferases reveals a role for DNMT3B in genic methylation. Nature 520, 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14176 (2015).
Dukatz, M. et al. Complex DNA sequence readout mechanisms of the DNMT3B DNA methyltransferase. Nucl. Acids Res. 48, 11495–11509. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa938 (2020).
Mallona, I. et al. Flanking sequence preference modulates de novo DNA methylation in the mouse genome. Nucl. Acids Res. 49, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1168 (2021).
Jeltsch, A., Adam, S., Dukatz, M., Emperle, M. & Bashtrykov, P. Deep enzymology studies on DNA methyltransferases reveal novel connections between flanking sequences and enzyme activity. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 167186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167186 (2021).
Fan, H. et al. Genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation reveals preferred sequences of DNMTs in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Tumour. Biol. 37, 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3202-z (2016).
Takahashi, M. et al. Analysis of DNA methylation change induced by Dnmt3b in mouse hepatocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 434, 873–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.041 (2013).
Wienholz, B. L. et al. DNMT3L modulates significant and distinct flanking sequence preference for DNA methylation by DNMT3A and DNMT3B in vivo. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001106 (2010).
Lin, C. C., Chen, Y. P., Yang, W. Z., Shen, J. C. K. & Yuan, H. S. Structural insights into CpG-specific DNA methylation by human DNA methyltransferase 3B. Nucl. Acids Res. 48, 3949–3961. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa111 (2020).
Lee, H. J., Hore, T. A. & Reik, W. Reprogramming the methylome: erasing memory and creating diversity. Cell Stem Cell 14, 710–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.008 (2014).
Stadler, M. B. et al. DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature 480, 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10716 (2011).
Ziller, M. J. et al. Charting a dynamic DNA methylation landscape of the human genome. Nature 500, 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12433 (2013).
Hu, S. et al. DNA methylation presents distinct binding sites for human transcription factors. Elife 2, e00726. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00726 (2013).
Palakurthy, R. K. et al. Epigenetic silencing of the RASSF1A tumor suppressor gene through HOXB3-mediated induction of DNMT3B expression. Mol. Cell 36, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.009 (2009).
Liu, W., Xie, A., Tu, C. & Liu, W. REX-1 represses RASSF1a and activates the MEK/ERK pathway to promote tumorigenesis in prostate cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 19, 1666–1675. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0974 (2021).
Ben Gacem, R. et al. Clinicopathologic significance of DNA methyltransferase 1, 3a, and 3b overexpression in Tunisian breast cancers. Hum. Pathol. 43, 1731–1738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2011.12.022 (2012).
Steine, E. J. et al. Genes methylated by DNA methyltransferase 3b are similar in mouse intestine and human colon cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 1748–1752. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43169 (2011).
Roll, J. D., Rivenbark, A. G., Jones, W. D. & Coleman, W. B. DNMT3b overexpression contributes to a hypermethylator phenotype in human breast cancer cell lines. Mol. Cancer 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-7-15 (2008).
Peralta-Arrieta, I., Hernandez-Sotelo, D., Castro-Coronel, Y., Leyva-Vazquez, M. A. & Illades-Aguiar, B. DNMT3B modulates the expression of cancer-related genes and downregulates the expression of the gene VAV3 via methylation. Am. J. Cancer Res. 7, 77–87 (2017).
Teneng, I. et al. Global identification of genes targeted by DNMT3b for epigenetic silencing in lung cancer. Oncogene 34, 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.580 (2015).
Yu, J. et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase regulates DNMT3B expression/aberrant DNA methylation phenotype and AKT activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 434, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2018.07.013 (2018).
Hervouet, E., Vallette, F. M. & Cartron, P. F. Dnmt3/transcription factor interactions as crucial players in targeted DNA methylation. Epigenetics 4, 487–499. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.4.7.9883 (2009).
Kim, J. H. et al. LRpath analysis reveals common pathways dysregulated via DNA methylation across cancer types. BMC Genom. 13, 526. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-526 (2012).
Lee, S. M. et al. Intragenic CpG islands play important roles in bivalent chromatin assembly of developmental genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1885–E1894. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613300114 (2017).
Zhu, X. et al. DNMT3B-mediated FAM111B methylation promotes papillary thyroid tumor glycolysis, growth and metastasis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 4372–4387. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.72397 (2022).
Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Du, D., Gu, X. & Zhou, S. PCDH17 is regulated by methylation of DNMT3B and affects the malignant biological behavior of HCC through EMT. Exp. Cell Res. 418, 113245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113245 (2022).
Yang, J. et al. DNA methyltransferase 3 beta regulates promoter methylation of microRNA-149 to augment esophageal squamous cell carcinoma development through the ring finger protein 2/Wnt/beta-catenin axis. Bioengineered 13, 4010–4027. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2031411 (2022).
Wang, J. et al. Interaction between DNMT3B and MYH11 via hypermethylation regulates gastric cancer progression. BMC Cancer 21, 914. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08653-3 (2021).
Lin, Z. et al. FOXC1 promotes HCC proliferation and metastasis by Upregulating DNMT3B to induce DNA Hypermethylation of CTH promoter. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 40, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-01829-6 (2021).
Xu, K. et al. DNMT3B silencing suppresses migration and invasion by epigenetically promoting miR-34a in bladder cancer. Aging (Albany NY) 12, 23668–23683. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103820 (2020).
Meng, X. et al. DNMT3B expression might contribute to abnormal methylation of RASSF1A in lager colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2020, 1798729. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1798729 (2020).
Jeziorska, D. M. et al. DNA methylation of intragenic CpG islands depends on their transcriptional activity during differentiation and disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7526–E7535. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703087114 (2017).
Cain, J. A., Montibus, B. & Oakey, R. J. Intragenic CpG islands and their impact on gene regulation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 832348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.832348 (2022).
Choi, W. Y. et al. DNA methylation of intragenic CpG islands are required for differentiation from iPSC to NPC. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 16, 1316–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-020-10041-6 (2020).
Jeong, S. et al. Selective anchoring of DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B to nucleosomes containing methylated DNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 5366–5376. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00484-09 (2009).
Kashiwagi, K., Nimura, K., Ura, K. & Kaneda, Y. DNA methyltransferase 3b preferentially associates with condensed chromatin. Nucl. Acids Res. 39, 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq870 (2011).
Rhee, I. et al. DNMT1 and DNMT3b cooperate to silence genes in human cancer cells. Nature 416, 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/416552a (2002).
Ili, C. et al. Landscape of genome-wide DNA methylation of colorectal cancer metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 12, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092710 (2020).
Hetzel, S. et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia displays a distinct highly methylated genome. Nat. Cancer 3, 768–782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00370-5 (2022).
Illingworth, R. S. & Bird, A. P. CpG islands–’a rough guide’. FEBS Lett. 583, 1713–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.04.012 (2009).
Heberle, E. & Bardet, A. F. Sensitivity of transcription factors to DNA methylation. Essays Biochem. 63, 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20190033 (2019).
Di Croce, L. et al. Methyltransferase recruitment and DNA hypermethylation of target promoters by an oncogenic transcription factor. Science 295, 1079–1082. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065173 (2002).
Suzuki, M. et al. Site-specific DNA methylation by a complex of PU.1 and Dnmt3a/b. Oncogene 25, 2477–2488. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209272 (2006).
Chand, V., Liao, X., Guzman, G., Benevolenskaya, E. & Raychaudhuri, P. Hepatocellular carcinoma evades RB1-induced senescence by activating the FOXM1-FOXO1 axis. Oncogene 41, 3778–3790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02394-8 (2022).
Chen, Y. Y. et al. ZEB1 induces Ddr1 promoter hypermethylation and contributes to the chronic pain in spinal cord in rats following oxaliplatin treatment. Neurochem. Res. 46, 2181–2191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-021-03355-5 (2021).
Crawford, N. T. et al. TBX2 interacts with heterochromatin protein 1 to recruit a novel repression complex to EGR1-targeted promoters to drive the proliferation of breast cancer cells. Oncogene 38, 5971–5986. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0853-z (2019).
Thompson, J. J. et al. ZBTB24 is a transcriptional regulator that coordinates with DNMT3B to control DNA methylation. Nucl. Acids Res. 46, 10034–10051. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky682 (2018).
Hu, S. et al. Profiling the human protein-DNA interactome reveals ERK2 as a transcriptional repressor of interferon signaling. Cell 139, 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.037 (2009).
Zeng, Y. et al. Lin28A binds active promoters and recruits Tet1 to regulate gene expression. Mol. Cell 61, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.11.020 (2016).
Gao, L. et al. Comprehensive structure-function characterization of DNMT3B and DNMT3A reveals distinctive de novo DNA methylation mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 11, 3355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17109-4 (2020).
Coulondre, C., Miller, J. H., Farabaugh, P. J. & Gilbert, W. Molecular basis of base substitution hotspots in Escherichia coli. Nature 274, 775–780. https://doi.org/10.1038/274775a0 (1978).
Weber, M. et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39, 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1990 (2007).
Lienert, F. et al. Identification of genetic elements that autonomously determine DNA methylation states. Nat. Genet. 43, 1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.946 (2011).
Fan, H. et al. MTSS1, a novel target of DNA methyltransferase 3B, functions as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 31, 2298–2308. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.411 (2012).
Ghoshal, K. et al. HOXB13, a target of DNMT3B, is methylated at an upstream CpG island, and functions as a tumor suppressor in primary colorectal tumors. PLoS ONE 5, e10338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010338 (2010).
Saito, Y. et al. Overexpression of a splice variant of DNA methyltransferase 3b, DNMT3b4, associated with DNA hypomethylation on pericentromeric satellite regions during human hepatocarcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10060–10065. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152121799 (2002).
Vidal, E. et al. A DNA methylation map of human cancer at single base-pair resolution. Oncogene 36, 5648–5657. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.176 (2017).
Schulze, I. et al. Increased DNA methylation of Dnmt3b targets impairs leukemogenesis. Blood 127, 1575–1586. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-07-655928 (2016).
Zheng, Y. et al. Loss of Dnmt3b accelerates MLL-AF9 leukemia progression. Leukemia 30, 2373–2384. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.112 (2016).
Lopusna, K. et al. Dnmt3b catalytic activity is critical for its tumour suppressor function in lymphomagenesis and is associated with c-Met oncogenic signalling. EBioMedicine 63, 103191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103191 (2021).
Gui, T. et al. TCF3 is epigenetically silenced by EZH2 and DNMT3B and functions as a tumor suppressor in endometrial cancer. Cell Death Differ. 28, 3316–3328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-021-00824-w (2021).
Wu, H. et al. miR-29c-3p regulates DNMT3B and LATS1 methylation to inhibit tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 10, 48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-1281-7 (2019).
Camero, S. et al. DNMT3A and DNMT3B targeting as an effective radiosensitizing strategy in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Cells 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112956 (2021).
Ruhrberg, C., Hajibagheri, M. A., Parry, D. A. & Watt, F. M. Periplakin, a novel component of cornified envelopes and desmosomes that belongs to the plakin family and forms complexes with envoplakin. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1835–1849. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.139.7.1835 (1997).
Nishimori, T. et al. Proteomic analysis of primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma reveals downregulation of a cell adhesion protein, periplakin. Proteomics 6, 1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500262 (2006).
Hatakeyama, H. et al. Protein clusters associated with carcinogenesis, histological differentiation and nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer. Proteomics 6, 6300–6316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600488 (2006).
Otsubo, T. et al. Aberrant DNA hypermethylation reduces the expression of the desmosome-related molecule periplakin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 4, 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.369 (2015).
Davies, H. et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417, 949–954. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00766 (2002).
Fang, M., Ou, J., Hutchinson, L. & Green, M. R. The BRAF oncoprotein functions through the transcriptional repressor MAFG to mediate the CpG Island Methylator phenotype. Mol. Cell 55, 904–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.010 (2014).
Tamura, T., Yanai, H., Savitsky, D. & Taniguchi, T. The IRF family transcription factors in immunity and oncogenesis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26, 535–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090400 (2008).
Cavalli, L. R., Riggins, R. B., Wang, A., Clarke, R. & Haddad, B. R. Frequent loss of heterozygosity at the interferon regulatory factor-1 gene locus in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 121, 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0509-8 (2010).
Loss, L. A. et al. Prediction of epigenetically regulated genes in breast cancer cell lines. BMC Bioinf. 11, 305. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-305 (2010).
Zong, L. et al. Establishment of a DNA methylation marker to evaluate cancer cell fraction in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 19, 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0475-2 (2016).
Dixon, G. et al. QSER1 protects DNA methylation valleys from de novo methylation. Science 372, 1. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd0875 (2021).
Smith, Z. D. et al. Epigenetic restriction of extraembryonic lineages mirrors the somatic transition to cancer. Nature 549, 543–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23891 (2017).
Dong, G., Qiu, F., Liu, C., Wu, H. & Liu, Y. High expression of DNMT3B promotes proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via Hippo signaling pathway. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 39, 1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2019.12.08 (2019).
Amante, S. M. et al. Transcription of intragenic CpG islands influences spatiotemporal host gene pre-mRNA processing. Nucl. Acids Res. 48, 8349–8359. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa556 (2020).
Nowialis, P. et al. Catalytically inactive Dnmt3b rescues mouse embryonic development by accessory and repressive functions. Nat. Commun. 10, 4374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12355-7 (2019).
Acknowledgements
During the development of the investigation, Loaeza-Loaeza J was a grant recipient of CONACYT. The authors acknowledge the technical assistance from Georgina Guerrero Avendaño for lentivirus production and migration assays provided by PhD Eduardo Castañeda Saucedo.
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Council of Science and Technology (grant no. 242812).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.L.L. and A.C.C. designed and performed the experiments. H.R.R., F.R.T. and D.H.S. conceived and designed the study. Y.C.C., O.d.M., J.L.L., and D.H.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Loaeza-Loaeza, J., Cerecedo-Castillo, A.J., Rodríguez-Ruiz, H.A. et al. DNMT3B overexpression downregulates genes with CpG islands, common motifs, and transcription factor binding sites that interact with DNMT3B. Sci Rep 12, 20839 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24186-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24186-6
This article is cited by
-
Murine leukemia virus (MLV) P50 protein induces cell transformation via transcriptional regulatory function
Retrovirology (2023)
-
The relationship between DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B) and miR 124-3pa expressions in bladder cancer tissues
Molecular Biology Reports (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.