Volcanic activity provides a unique opportunity to study the ecological responses of organisms to catastrophic environmental destruction as an essential driver of biodiversity change on islands. However, despite this great scientific interest, no study of the biodiversity at an erupting volcano has yet been undertaken. On La Palma (Canary archipelago), we quantified the main species affected and their fate during the 85-day eruption (September–December 2021). Our main objective consisted of monitoring the biodiversity subjected to critical stress during this volcanic eruption. We found that all biodiversity within a 2.5 km radius was severely affected after the first two weeks. It is challenging to assess whether volcanism can drive evolutionary traits of insular organisms. Examples are the adaptation of an endemic conifer to high temperatures, selection of functional plant types—secondary woodiness—, effects of the disappearance of invertebrates and their influence in trophic nets and vertebrate trophic plasticity. However, our data suggest that such previous evolutionary changes might continue to favour their resilience during this eruption. Lastly, it is a very good opportunity to assess the extent to which these periodic volcanic catastrophes may constitute temporary windows of repeated opportunities for the evolution and speciation of oceanic island biota.
Volcanism has long been operating on Earth1, favouring the initiation of life, e.g. aiding in synthesizing its primordial elements2, especially on oceanic islands. Since then, volcanic eruptions of different magnitudes and duration have been key factors in extinctions and evolution at local and global scales. Repeatedly, ecosystems have been modified substantially, and species populations were selected, thus stimulating speciation3. Most of the seminal studies on “volcano ecosystems” (sensu3) have been focused on community succession after an eruptive event such as the cases of Islas Revillagigedo (San Benedicto), Krakatau, Long Island (Papua New Guinea), Mount St Helens and Surtsey (see4,5).
Research at iconic volcanoes, such as those mentioned, has influenced the understanding of ecosystem dynamics and ecological responses to eruptive events. Effusive eruptions of lava often result in the disappearance of pre-existing ecosystems due to burial and extreme temperatures. Volcanic disturbances rarely result in the complete disappearance of biota, since survival is common, ranging from the persistence of most biota to the survival of only a few individuals of some species in isolated refugia3. Vegetation is affected by tephra fall, including foliage abrasion and loading, burial, and chemical toxicity. Later, coarse or fine-grained tephra deposits can cover or damage surviving vegetation and inhibit photosynthesis and the emergence of buried seed sprouts. Animals die when subjected to extremes of temperature, impact force or burial due to lava flows, pyroclastic density currents, lahars or deep tephra (> 50 cm), in almost all circumstances3.
Unlike other volcanic eruptions whose impact on ecosystems could not be studied because they were either too large/hazardous (Pinatubo) or continuously ongoing (Kilauea, Stromboli), La Palma in 2021 had the advantage of being a discrete time-limited event, which allowed it to be intimately monitored. Therefore, this recent eruption in the Canary archipelago offers a unique opportunity to investigate (i) fundamental processes directly connected with an effusive—moderately explosive eruption (VEI = 3) and (ii) their impacts on oceanic island ecosystems and their terrestrial biodiversity, characterized by their high degree of endemicity6. Some studies have been tremendously influential in understanding ecosystem dynamics, such as long-term documentation after the cataclysmic 1883 Krakatau eruption4. However, quantitative and systematic ecological research during a volcanic eruption has been lacking.
Here, we specifically study the impact of the recent (Sept–Dec 2021) eruption on the biodiversity of La Palma, an island declared a World Biosphere Reserve in 2002. This island harbours a rich biodiversity at a regional and national scale. Indeed, more than 5979 terrestrial species (1106 endemic, 18%) have been listed in its territory, including at least 904 vascular plant species, 2741 arthropods, and 62 vertebrates7,8.
On 19 September, 2021, a volcanic eruption began in the southwest of La Palma, in a zone called “Hoya de Tajogaite” on Cumbre Vieja volcanic ridge (Fig. 1). It was the first terrestrial volcanic eruption in the Canary Islands since the 1971 Teneguía volcano at the southern tip of the same island. The 85 days of volcanic eruption constitute the longest historical eruptive episode on La Palma, with simultaneous effusive and explosive activity alternating between strombolian and vulcanian styles, which left an edifice 36.5 Mm3 in volume and 177 m high9. About 177 Mm3 of lava flows were also produced, covering 12.41 km2 (Fig. 1)9,10 and 45 Mm3 of tephra11. Nearly the whole island was affected by tephra during the eruption, accumulating a depth of > 1.5 m in the proximity of the cone. The eruption severely affected only a minor area of the island (~ 4%), causing stress conditions in the surrounding ecosystems, for instance through the emission of approximately 1 Mt of sulphur dioxide between September and December 202112.
This study was an excellent opportunity to evaluate the influence of an eruption on the rich legacy of insular biodiversity by examining the vicinity of craters and lava flows. Indeed, we put forward some interesting research questions that had not hitherto been tackled in real-time, listed as follows. (1) At what time and geographical scale (distance from crater) did specific groups of plants and their populations collapse? (2) To what extent are key insular species like the endemic Canary pine, Pinus canariensis, adapted to various stressors arising from volcanism? (3) Is the dominance of particular plant functional types on oceanic islands linked to or even favoured by volcanic activity? (4) How strongly affected was the invertebrate community, on which many saurians and small passerines depend? (5) How important was trophic plasticity for some vertebrates during this volcanic process? (6) Do body size and mobility capabilities control the responses of vertebrates? Finally, (7) to what extent can regular volcanic catastrophes constitute time-windows of opportunities for the evolution and speciation of oceanic island biota?
Our activity consisted of monitoring the biodiversity subjected to critical stress due to the eruptive process. The main aims of this work comprised spatial and temporal assessments of (1) plant species cover and vitality, (2) trends in the abundance of invertebrates on soil and plants, (3) patterns in the density and behavioural responses of terrestrial vertebrates (lizards, birds and bats).
The species whose survival status was evaluated in this study were: 50 flowering and coniferous plant species (25 endemic to the Canary Islands), 42 invertebrates (12 endemic) and 27 vertebrates (3 endemic). Of the total 1241 ha covered by lava flows10, 165 ha (13%) hosted vegetation classifiable as pine forest, 826 ha (67%) as thermophilous shrubland and 250 ha (20%) as xerophytic scrub. The prevailing winds were from the north-east, corresponding to the predominant trade winds (Fig. 2). Therefore, the gases and pyroclastic tephra were blown in a south-westerly direction. Sulphur emissions (SO2, H2S and H2SO4 aerosols; https://volcan.lapalma.es/pages/calidad-del-aire) mostly impacted the pine forest, the ecosystem in which the volcano arose (Figs. 1 and 2). The intense tephra fallout mainly affected those areas within the 2.5 km perimeter closest to the crater (but especially towards the south-west), including pine forest and thermophilous shrubland (Fig. 2). The lava flows covered a large part of the local thermophilous and xerophytic ecosystems (Fig. 1).
Impact on the endemic Canary pine (P. canariensis) habitat reached about 7 km southwards of the volcano and 1.5 km to the north (Table 1). Except for the first 300 m nearest the volcano, chlorosis of pines appeared first in the south (after the third week) and later in the north, from the eighth week onwards. Three episodes of ultrafine tephra emissions (Table 1) caused substantial damage to branches due to the weight of deposits, two of them in rainy conditions making their consistency especially cohesive. The pine trunks first re-sprouted two weeks after the eruption ended (December 13, 2021), even some just outside the new crater itself. At least 90% of the pines within 300 m of the crater seemed to resist the effects of the eruption, and green buds were seen at the needle-bases in tufts and on scratched branches. The state of the pines clearly improved further from the crater. Fruticose lichen thalli (Usnea articulata) are normally abundant on Canary pines and resisted well until the 12th week of the eruption. In contrast to lichens, ferns (Pteridium aquilinum) were the first organism clearly affected during the first week.
The eruption began at the end of the warm dry summer season, of importance to flowering plants because they were probably at their most vulnerable and delicate. In the nearest 200 m to the lava flows, plant cover was clearly higher in the pine forest (83.1%) compared to the other two main habitats (thermophilous shrubland: 20.7% and xerophytic scrub: 21.8%). In the same 200 m band, a high percentage (91%) of undergrowth plant species were affected during the first month of the eruption in pine forest plots located in the same altitudinal band as the crater. However, this effect gradually decreased when habitats and plants were situated further from the crater, in both thermophilous shrubland (79%) and xerophytic scrub (25%) (see vegetation cover and damage in Table S1). Understorey plants (mainly the shrubs Cistus symphytifolius and Chamaecytisus prolifer ssp. palmensis) endemic to the pine forest habitat were severely affected during the fourth week, coinciding with the first emission of ultrafine tephra. While C. symphytifolius had its leaves perforated by the falling pyroclasts, Ch. prolifer lost its leaves, thus limiting photosynthesis to its green stems. Contrarily, the woody thermophilous vegetation (e.g. Retama rhodorhizoides, Rumex lunaria, Echium brevirame, Euphorbia lamarckii or Kleinia neriifolia) located within the 2.5 km closest to the crater appeared deeply affected after the seventh week. In the xerophytic scrub (succulent plants), many plant populations disappeared completely under lava flows, such as the archipelago endemic Euphorbia canariensis, and others showed severely reduced populations, like Euphorbia balsamifera or Sideritis barbellata.
As for the animals, the invertebrate community (Table S2) almost collapsed after the first couple of weeks, particularly within the 2.5 km band. Compared with previous data from the eruption area, a total 72% of the invertebrate biodiversity disappeared, involving a 97.5% reduction in biomass. This also led to the collapse of the trophic net of insectivorous vertebrates (mainly lizards, geckos and small passerines), which disappeared or became much less abundant in this area (Figs. 2 and 3). Many lizards died due to their unfortunate tendency to hide under rocks when they noticed the lava flows advancing. The thick accumulation of tephra also buried or filled in many such refugia for lizards and geckos, making this group the most affected among vertebrates. Abundance of lizards significantly decreased every fortnight as the volcano erupted, whereas this trend gradually improved > 2.5 km away from the crater cone (Fig. 3; Table S3). All observations seemed to indicate that small lizards (64% of individuals counted in censuses) survived better than medium (26.7%) and large lizards (8.9%). During the fourth week of the eruption, at least six medium or large-sized lizards and three adult geckos appeared in the middle of an extensive area of tephra capping their natural habitat, within 2.5 km from the crater.
Birds were also affected by falling pyroclasts and tephra during the eruption. Their numbers were halved within 2.5 km of the crater, affecting communities (mainly Passeriformes and Columbiformes) typical of the pine forest and partially those of the thermophilous habitat (Fig. 4; Table S3). By contrast, in this zone, large-sized birds (Buteo buteo and Corvus corax) were more abundant, and they were frequently observed nearby or flying within the volcanic plume. Concerning the time sequence in the most abundant species, numbers clearly decreased during the first two weeks (Fig. 4). Particularly, Columba livia, Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax and Serinus canarius significantly dropped in numbers. There was also a strong impact on bird behaviour during the first two weeks, some of them changing their feeding habits. This was the striking case of Falco tinnunculus, which was not recorded trying to catch lizards (its most habitual prey) but small passerine birds and Eurasian collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto) instead, with six attempts recorded during this period. Furthermore, it struck our attention that small passerines like Sylvia/Curruca spp. maintained their territories until the arrival of the lava flows. The only native mammal recorded was the endemic insectivorous bat Pipistrellus maderensis. Its presence in the 2.5 km area decreased after the first two weeks of volcanic activity, being relatively frequent during the whole eruption period only in the distant coastal banana plantations (potential xerophytic scrub).
To our knowledge, this is the only work done on the terrestrial biodiversity status in the direct vicinity of a limited duration volcanic eruption. In this contribution, we document and assess the impact on the main plant and animal groups within the ecosystems during a volcanic eruption (Table 1). While some groups were clearly disadvantaged: ferns and herbaceous plants as well as invertebrates and saurians (lizards and geckos); other groups such as conifers and woody shrubs showed better resilience, as did the birds.
This study is particularly important because of its location in a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot13,14, harbouring a unique ecosystem of oceanic island organisms (38% of the Canary archipelago endemicity). Islands indeed exhibit a disproportionate amount of the world’s biodiversity but unfortunately a high number of extinctions have also occurred there14. The biodiversity in the south of the island is poorer than in the north. This is probably explained in part by the relatively frequent volcanic activity featuring seven major eruptions since 1585, including this one in 2021 (see15), which led to alternating destruction and neo-colonization processes.
Concerning the flora, the Canary pine forest was the most affected ecosystem and vegetation type, as it is dominant in the vicinity of the new volcanic vents. The southern slopes of this forest were the most disturbed area due to the location of the volcano, combined with the prevailing northeasterly trade winds (Fig. 1). Tephra fallout and sulphurous gases were the main factors that affected the pine forest, over a vast surface area. Furthermore, the local xerophytic and thermophilous habitats also lost much of their surface area. In contrast to the pine forest, this drastic reduction was caused by the progressive downslope expansion of the lava flows.
The Canary Island pine was thus notably affected by tephra fall, sulphuric acid aerosol12, and short episodes of acid rain. However, this conifer shows high resistance to temperature, confirming its great adaptation to volcanic events16, which is probably also one of the keys to its resistance to the more frequent present-day wildfires17. This pine species has evolved among volcanoes for the last 13 My16 and has adapted successfully to high temperatures. Moreover, thunderstorms with lightning occur in the Canaries together with abundant rainfall; consequently, wild forest fires should presumably not have been so frequent in the island’s past, before human colonization. In this habitat it is also remarkable that epiphytic lichens (U. articulata) apparently resisted on the pines until the 12th week, considering their high sensitivity to anthropogenic pollution18.
The life cycle of flowering plants was drastically disrupted due to all the above factors, with great impact on foliage, photosynthesis, and growth. However, soil changes due to the deposition of tephra and its lixiviation by rain is one of the most dramatic factors affecting plants and a long-term impact of volcanic eruptions19. The nearest individuals to the crater were most directly affected by intense tephra falls and concentrated volcanic gases (SO2, HCl, HF, CO2). However, plants located in the nearest 200 m to the lava flows but at more than 2 km from the crater were presumably more disturbed by the high temperature of the slow-cooling lava and its lesser gas emissions.
Large woody plants exhibited a better frequency of survival than smaller ones in the face of this extreme stress (Table S1 and19). In the Hekla area (Iceland), most trees have thickened trunks, indicating that those trees that survive have had a long life subjected to frequent volcanic damage19. Secondary woodiness of island plants (sensu20) has been traditionally related to drought20,21, ecological shift22 or a counter-selection of inbreeding depression in founding island populations23. However, this adaptation also favours the resistance of many shrubby plants to high temperatures close to craters and lava flows but primarily their resistance to the intense tephra falls that affect a much larger area. In addition, plant and stem height plays a fundamental role in overcoming the deep layers of deposits. This latter effect was particularly important up to 2.5 km from the crater (tephra thickness > 30 cm) (Figs. 1 and 2), as the herbaceous plants were completely buried, sometimes to more than 1.5 m depth. Therefore, the seed bank has also probably been rendered largely non-functional. However, deposits were recorded over almost the whole island, indicating that longer lasting or more intense eruptions would severely affect an even larger area. Such events have been hitherto ignored in the intensely discussed “island woodiness” debate21,23,24,25,26,27. We found surviving populations of endemic woody taxa heavily impacted by tephra deposits close to lava flows, across a wide range of genera such as Rumex (R. lunaria), Echium (E. brevirame), Euphorbia (E. lamarckii, E. canariensis and E. balsamifera), Aeonium (A. davidbramwellii), Rubia (R. fruticosa), Schizogyne (S. sericea), Carlina (C. falcata) or Sonchus (S. hierrensis) (Table S2), which coincide with the general list of woody Canary plants20. Most members of these genera in other ecosystems on continents are mainly herbaceous. As such eruptions and their impacts due to ash depositions are frequent events on volcanic islands, e.g. several times within a century on La Palma, this is a “frequent” selective process at evolutionary time scales.
With regard to the fauna, the invertebrate community collapsed during the first two weeks (Table S2), probably due to rapid deterioration of the growth state of plants. These changes in the invertebrates were caused by the tephra contacting the cuticular lipid layer28 and water loss due to tegument abrasion29. In this period, many insect pests (especially whitefly pupae) in banana plantations (farmers’ observations) were drastically reduced. This sudden decrease in insect populations affected the whole food web and probably caused part of the ecological collapse of saurian and some passerine communities30. In the case of lizards, smaller individuals seem to resist the adverse conditions better than large ones, as observed in other eruptions3. This could be linked to their lower food requirements and greater ease in finding refuges. Loss of body condition in lizards post-eruption has been recorded and negatively affects reproduction quality31. However, some lizards have shown a good ability to find food in the tephra substrate32. We found abundant tephra particles in some vertebrate droppings (lizards, birds, and mammals) during the eruption, probably involuntarily ingested. At least in bats, ingestion during feeding produces physiological stress that is likely related to baldness, high ectoparasite loads or possible mineral deficiencies33.
As described in the Canary Islands, some passerines show high fidelity to their territories (see34). During the eruption, Sardinian warblers (Curruca melanocephala) maintained their territories until the imminent arrival of lava flows. Larger birds (kestrels F. tinnunculus, ravens C. corax and buzzards B. buteo) were well able to continue flying in the areas surrounding the crater. Furthermore, some cases like F. tinnunculus showed great feeding plasticity in the first couple of weeks. At least six times, kestrels tried to catch birds (especially small passerines and doves), contrary to their usual diet based on abundant lizards and insects35. Widening of trophic niches in island organisms has traditionally been interpreted as linked to disharmony in island ecosystems36,37,38. However, this plasticity is tremendously beneficial in ecological catastrophes, where food becomes exceptionally scarce. In the case of bats, their flight is limited by the delicate structure of their patagium, which can be damaged by the frequent pyroclastic tephra fall. Furthermore, scarcity of insects in the first few kilometres from the crater probably led to their displacement to other more distant and richer food resource zones.
As we learned from the movement capacity of the vertebrate animals that still inhabited the affected area, those with greater mobility, birds and bats, resisted the eruptive process much better than those with less mobility, e.g. saurians.
Lastly, during this destructive event on La Palma, we had the opportunity to increase our knowledge of how ecological-evolutionary adaptations have favoured the survival of insular organisms. Such responses are traditionally mentioned in the context of island biology. As already mentioned, one of the most interesting findings verifies the remarkable adaptation of Canary Island pine trees (P. canariensis) to volcanism (see16), including extremely harsh ecological conditions. Other insular trends related to the prevalence of woodiness in insular flowering plants20,21, or the high trophic plasticity of some vertebrates on oceanic islands36, have not previously been associated with their potential evolution along with volcanic processes. However, such evolutionary adaptations most likely played an important role in the survival of plants and animals affected by the volcano. For this reason, it is worth considering and debating whether these previously mentioned evolutionary processes are in fact also linked to repeated volcanic episodes on oceanic islands.
Material and methods
La Palma is a medium-sized island (708 km2) with high (2426 m a.s.l., Roque de Los Muchachos) and very steep topography. The humid north-east trade winds influence its climate, altitude and orientation. These prevailing air-currents provide conditions for highly heterogeneous environments and bioclimatic vegetation series, from coastal xeric to high mountain shrubs, via thermophilous, laurel and pine forests39.
The new volcano erupted in the southwestern part of La Palma (Fig. 1), at Hoya de Tajogaite on the northwest face of the Cumbre Vieja ridge. The northern half of La Palma underwent volcanism as early as 4.0 Ma40 with the building of a subsequently uplifted seamount (Basal Complex), over which the subaerial edifice developed, mainly after 1.8 Ma41. The aerial shield suffered from substantial gravitational instability that culminated in major flank collapses at ~ 1.1 Ma and ~ 560 ka41. Since the end of the intense post-collapse Bejenado activity at ~ 500 ka42, the volcanic activity was along the new Cumbre Vieja ridge, with the oldest exposed rocks dated at ~ 150 ka42. More than 80 relatively recent volcanoes can clearly be distinguished in all this area, indeed a total of 6 eruptions are recorded in historical chronicles (since the fifteenth century)15.
The affected area includes an altitudinal cline from 0 to 1200 m a.s.l. and an annual rainfall range between 300 and 1300 mm43, increasing with altitude. In general, biodiversity could be considered relatively poor there, due to previous recent intense eruption activity. Three main habitats are represented, 1) xerophytic scrub (0–250 m a.s.l.), 2) thermophilous shrub (300–750 m a.s.l.) and, 3) pine forest (750–1200 m a.s.l.) (see Fig. 1). The invertebrate fauna consists of a relatively low number of species, but the orders Coleoptera, Lepidoptera or Hymenoptera should be highlighted. Vertebrate fauna is principally composed of 2 reptiles (both endemic to the Canaries: the lizard Gallotia galloti and gecko Tarentola delalandii), about 12 breeding birds and one bat (Pipistrellus maderensis) endemic to the Canary and Madeira archipelagos. In addition to this native fauna, mammalian fauna introduced by humans inhabit the area, such as: mice, rats, rabbits, and feral cats.
We studied the most important events affecting biodiversity during the three months of this eruption. A total of 32 original sample stations were studied at the beginning of the eruptive process, from the immediate vicinity of the main crater to the sea (lava delta) (see Fig. 1). To follow up all these stations individually was impossible due to their ongoing destruction by new lava flows covering the habitat during the eruption. Therefore, we tried to construct a realistic scenario of the vegetation before and during the arrival of lava and its progress down the slopes. When each of these stations was engulfed, we established a new one as a replacement within the 200 m band closest to the lava flows. At each station, a 30 × 30 m plot was chosen to inventory and monitor the biodiversity present. The procedure was continued during the whole eruption process to gain a complete picture of the volcanic impact on the habitat and its evolution over time. These stations were selectively located to include the most natural areas to be found near the lava flows.
Our inventory quantified the species of flora and fauna in those areas; flowering plants, lizards and birds were intensively monitored as the most important groups in biomass represented in the ecosystem. A more approximate count and follow-up of insects and bats was also carried out. We worked up to a proximity of 1 km from the crater, following the security guidelines set by the Volcanic Emergency Plan of the Canary Islands (PEVOLCA). Furthermore, we closely observed areas within 200 m of the volcanic lava flows, including their advancing front and the flanks. Maintaining this routine, 32 workstations surrounding the expanding terrestrial area of the eruption were censused and monitored, from the main crater down to the sea shore.
Concerning the flora in the 30 × 30 m plots, we identified each plant species, their number of individuals and cover, together with their vital and conservation state. As for fauna, we performed censuses of birds during 5 min periods, detailing our distance (± 10 m) from each contact and whether they were heard or seen in the first 3 h after sunrise. Lizards were counted from 3 h after sunrise until 3:00 p.m. in a 2 × 30 m band within the plot and assigned a body size according to snout-vent length (small: < 7 cm, medium: 7–10 cm and large: > 10 cm). Both censuses were done in the same plots as plants. Invertebrates were inventoried and followed up by 30 min visual surveys in a 50 × 50 m plot covering all three habitats. The number of plots in the respective habitats corresponded to their relative surface area. Only invertebrates on plants and soils or in flight were recorded, because under-rock invertebrates disappeared below the lava flows and falling tephra. There was a previously available dataset for this animal group from this zone and season due to recent work by one author (RG). To compare these previous data (quantified by a rank order; rare: 1–5 exx, occasional: 6–10 exx and frequent: > 10 exx) with those obtained during the eruption, we adopted the same criteria. At the same time, information was gathered on the natural history of the area, which allowed us to verify the changes that occurred in animal behaviour, the state of plants and each interaction between animals and plants.
Categorical data analyses (Chi-square) were carried out using the statistical package R 220.127.116.11. We compared the lizard abundance during each two-week period in both the zone up to 2.5 km from the crater and beyond this distance. The same methodology was applied to the six most abundant bird species.
To collect further basic data to understand particular processes affecting biodiversity, more than 150 tephra thickness measurements were performed along and across the main propagation direction of the eruption plume (Weiser et al.12). This campaign was undertaken a few days before the end of the eruption, between 30 November and 5 December. The dispersion direction of the ash plume was provided daily by the PEVOLCA and is reported in the inverse wind rose (Fig. 2) as the direction of deposition (direction towards which the plume is blown). An ENE-WSW thickness profile was synthesized from these measurements to depict the distribution of the pyroclast deposits along the southern border of the new lava field where the biodiversity observations were made.
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the Dryad repository, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v6wwpzgzr.
Nédélec, A., Monnereau, M. & Toplis, M. J. The Hadean-Archaean transition at 4 Ga: From magma trapping in the mantle to volcanic resurfacing of the Earth. Terra Nova 29, 218–223 (2017).
Springsklee, C. et al. Prebiotic synthesis in volcanic discharges: Lightning, porous ash and volcanic gas atmospheres. EGU General Assembly, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020–8328 (2020).
Crisafulli, C. M., Swanson, F. J., Halvorson, J. J. & Clarkson, B. D. Volcano ecology: Disturbance characteristics and assembly of biological communities. In The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes 2nd edn (ed. Sigurdsson, H.) 1267–1306 (Academic Press, 2015).
Whittaker, R. J. & Jones, S. H. The role of frugivorous bats and birds in the rebuilding of a tropical forest, Krakatau, Indonesia. J. Biogeogr. 21, 245–258 (1994).
Jakobsson, S. P., Magnusson, B. & Gunnarsson, K. Surtsey Research Society. Surtsey Research 12, Reykjavik, Iceland (2009).
Kier, G. et al. A global assessment of endemism and species richness across Island and mainland regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9322–9327 (2009).
Arechavaleta, M., Rodríguez, S., Zurita N. & García A. (coord.) Lista de especies silvestres de Canarias. Hongos, plantas y animales terrestres 2009. Gobierno de Canarias. 579 pp. (2010).
Beierkuhnlein, C., Walentowitz, A. & Welss, W. FloCan- A revised checklist for the flora of the Canary Islands. Diversity 13, 480 (2021).
Civico, R. et al. High-resolution Digital Surface Model of the 2021 eruption deposit of Cumbre Vieja volcano, La Palma, Spain. Sci. Data 9, 435 (2022).
Copernicus Emergency Management Service (© 2021 European Union), EMSR546: https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/list-of-components/EMSR546.
Romero, J. E. et al. Volume and stratigraphy of the Cumbre Vieja 2021 eruption tephra fallout, La Palma Island. Conference: VMSG 2022. (The University of Manchester, 2022).
Weiser, F. et al. Impact of sudden volcanic sulphur emissions on the vegetation of La Palma, Spain. Forests 13, 299 (2022).
Médail, F. & Quézel, P. Biodiversity hotspots in the Mediterranean basin: Setting global conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 13, 1510–1513 (1999).
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., Fonseca, G. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).
Hernández-Pacheco, A. & Valls, M. C. The historic eruptions of La Palma Island (Canarias). Arquipelago 3, 83–94 (1982).
López de Heredia, U., López, R., Collada, C., Emerson, B. C. & Gil, L. Signatures of volcanism and aridity in the evolution of an insular pine (Pinus canariensis Chr. Sm. Ex DC in Buch). Heredity 113, 240–249 (2014).
Climent, J., Tapias, R., Pardos, J. A. & Gil, L. Fire adaptations in the Canary Islands pine (Pinus canariensis). Plant Ecol. 171, 185–196 (2004).
Nash, T. H. Lichens as indicators of air pollution. Naturwissenschaften 63, 364–367 (1976).
Dale, V. H., Delgado-Acevedo, J. & MacMahon, J. Effects of modern volcanic eruptions on vegetation. In Volcanoes and the Environment (eds. Martí, J. & Erns G. G. J.) 227–248. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Lens, F., Davin, N., Smets, E. & Del Arco, M. Insular Woodiness on the Canary Islands: A remarkable case of convergent evolution. Int. J. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.1086/670259 (2013).
Hooft van Huysduynen, A. et al. Temporal and palaeoclimatic context of the evolution of insular woodiness in the Canary Islands. Ecol. Evol. 11, 12220–12231 (2021).
Panero, J. L., Francisco-Ortega, J., Jansen, R. K. & Santos-Guerra, A. Molecular evidence for multiple origins of woodiness and a New World biogeographic connection of the Macaronesian Island endemic Pericallis (Asteraceae: Senecioneae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13886–13891 (1999).
Böhle, U.-R., Hilger, H. H. & Martin, W. F. Island colonization and evolution of the insular woody habit in Echium L. (Boraginaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11740–11745 (1996).
Carlquist, S. Island Biology (Columbia University Press, 1974).
Baldwin, B. G. A new look at phenotypic disparity and diversification rates in island plant radiations. New Phytol. 224, 8–10 (2019).
Nürk, N. M., Atchison, G. W. & Hughes, C. E. Island woodiness underpins accelerated disparification in plant radiations. New Phytol. 224, 518–531 (2019).
Zizka, A. et al. Plant longevity, drought and island isolation favoured rampant evolutionary transitions towards insular woodiness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2208629119 (2022).
Edwards, J. S. Animals and volcanoes: Survival and revival. In Volcanoes and the Environment (eds. Martí, J. & Erns, G. G. J.) 250–272. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Edwards, J. S. & Schwartz, L. M. Mount St. Helens ash: A natural insecticide. Can. J. Zool. 59, 714–715 (1981).
Hilton, G. M., Atkinson, P. W., Gray, G. A. L., Arendt, W. J. & Gibbons, D. W. Rapid decline of the volcanically threatened Monserrat Oriole. Biol. Conserv. 111, 79–89 (2003).
Boretto, J. M., Cabezas-Cartes, F., Kibish, E. L., Sinervo, B. & Ibargüengoytia, N. R. Changes in female reproduction and body condition in an endemic lizard, Phymaturus spectabilis, following the Puyehue volcanic ashfall event. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 9, 181–191 (2012).
Mora, M. & Labra, A. The response of two lizard species to ash from fire and volcanism. J. Herpetol. 51, 388–395 (2017).
Pedersen, S. C., Popowics, T. E., Kwiecinski, G. G. & Knudsen, D. E. B. Sublethal pathology in bats associated with stress and volcanic activity on Monserrat, West Indies. J. Mammal. 93, 1380–2139 (2012).
Illera, J. C. & Díaz, M. Site fidelity in the Canary Islands stonechat Saxicola dacotiae in relation to spatial and temporal patterns of habitat suitability. Acta Oecol. 34, 1–8 (2008).
Martín, A. & Lorenzo J. A. Aves del Archipiélago Canario. (Francisco Lemus Editor, 2001).
Gorman, M. L. Island Ecology (Champman and Hall, 1979).
MacArthur, R. H., Diamond, J. M. & Karr, J. R. Density compensation in island faunas?. Ecology 53, 330–342 (1972).
Balza, U. et al. The dynamic trophic niche of an island bird of prey. Ecol. Evol. 10, 12264–12276 (2020).
del Arco M., Acebes J. R., Pérez de Paz, P. L. & Marrero, M. C. Bioclimatology and climatophilous vegetation of Hierro (part 2) and La Palma (Canary Islands). Phytocoenologia 29, 253–290 (1999).
Staudigel, H. & Schmincke, H. U. The Pliocene seamount series of La Palma/Canary Islands. J. Geoph. Res. 89, 11195–11215 (1984).
Guillou, H., Carracedo, J. C. & Duncan, R. A. K-Ar, 40Ar–39Ar ages and magnetostratigraphy of Brunhes and Matuyama lava sequences from La Palma Island. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 106, 175–194 (2001).
Hildenbrand, A., Gillot, P.-Y., Soler, V. & Lahitte, P. Evidence for a persistent uplifting of La Palma (Canary Islands), inferred from morphological and radiometric data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 210, 277–289 (2003).
Marzol-Jaén, V. L. Lluvia, un Recurso Natural Para Canarias (Servicio de publicaciones de la Caja General de Ahorros de Canarias, 1988).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2022).
Daily interchange of biological information with our team of volcanologists was the key to better understanding many details of the impact of this 85-day eruption on the rich local biodiversity. Pablo González, Sergio Rodríguez, Jesica López provided us with important references, comments, and support in the field. Sergio Pérez helped identify lichens, and Juan Ignacio Padrón and Jesús Marco provided all kinds of logistic support. We thank the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Real Decreto 1078/2021, de 7 de diciembre), to fund the research activities of the CSIC-PIE project with ID numbers CSIC-LAPALMA-02 and CSIC-LAPALMA-05. The administration of the IPNA-CSIC, Cabildo Insular de La Palma, Gobierno de Canarias and Gesplan S.A. facilitated our work. The manuscript was proof edited by Guido Jones, currently funded by the Cabildo de Tenerife, under the TFinnova Programme supported by MEDI and FDCAN funds. This article is dedicated to the memory of Aurelio Acevedo Rodríguez for his defence of Canarian biodiversity, particularly threatened endemic plants.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Nogales, M., Guerrero-Campos, M., Boulesteix, T. et al. The fate of terrestrial biodiversity during an oceanic island volcanic eruption. Sci Rep 12, 19344 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22863-0
This article is cited by
npj Biodiversity (2023)