Abstract
Geological records of ice sheet collapse can provide perspective on the ongoing retreat of grounded and floating ice. An abrupt retreat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) that occurred during the early deglaciation is well recorded on the eastern Ross Sea continental shelf. There, an ice shelf breakup at 12.3 ± 0.6 cal. (calibrated) kyr BP caused accelerated ice-mass loss from the Bindschadler Ice Stream (BIS). The accelerated mass loss led to a significant negative mass balance that re-organized WAIS flow across the central and eastern Ross Sea. By ~ 11.5 ± 0.3 cal kyr BP, dynamic thinning of grounded ice triggered a retreat that opened a ~ 200-km grounding-line embayment on the Whales Deep Basin (WDB) middle continental shelf. Here, we reconstruct the pattern, duration and rate of retreat from a backstepping succession of small-scale grounding-zone ridges that formed on the embayment’s eastern flank. We used two end-member paleo-sediment fluxes, i.e., accumulation rates, to convert the cumulative sediment volumes of the ridge field to elapsed time for measured distances of grounding-line retreat. The end-members fluxes correspond to deposition rates for buttressed and unbuttressed ice stream flow. Both scenarios require sustained rapid retreat that exceeded several centuries. Grounding-line retreat is estimated to have averaged between ~ 100 ± 32 and ~ 700 ± 79 ma−1. The evidence favors the latter scenario because iceberg furrows that cross cut the ridges in deep water require weakly buttressed flow as the embayment opened. In comparison with the modern grounding-zone dynamics, this paleo-perspective provides confidence in model projections that a large-scale sustained contraction of grounded ice is underway in several Pacific-Ocean sectors of the WAIS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Glaciers in the Amundsen Sea sector of West Antarctica are speeding up and grounding lines retreating as their ice shelves thin1. This raises concern that an unstable collapse may be underway2,3,4. The term collapse is not precisely defined but is generally used to describe a significant contraction in the extent and volume of grounded ice within a relatively short time. In the Bellingshausen-Sea sector, 65% of WAIS grounding lines have retreated between 1990 and 20155. These dynamics are at least partly driven by upwelled circumpolar deep water that advects onto the continental shelf and melts the ice sheet’s marine margins. Since 1979, discharge from fast-flowing WAIS glacial systems has contributed nearly 7 mm of sea-level equivalent volume to global sea level rise6. Recent modeling studies have projected that Pine Island Glacier losses could exceed 100 Gt/yr−1 within 20 years3. Model simulations project that a transition to an even more rapid retreat could occur within 200–900 years2. These projections all rely on two tacit assumptions: firstly, that the current rapid contractions are anomalously fast and secondly, that the fast rates will be sustained for several centuries. The assumptions are important to justify because changes to these large-scale glacial systems are probably complex and some studies have shown that feedbacks such as isostatic rebound7, grounding zone sedimentation8 or sea-level fall9 may halt and/or even reverse rapid flow and retreat.
Today, retreat rates are highly variable along the grounding line and in time10. The relative shortness of the satellite-era observations highlights the need to assess longer-term dynamics associated with past episodes of major ice sheet contraction. Previous studies of the Antarctic continental margin glacial morphology and sedimentology have estimated that the post-LGM retreat rates ranged between 40 and 180 ma−111,12,13. Here, we evaluated a post-LGM record from the eastern Ross Sea continental shelf where several details of WAIS retreat are better constrained in the WDB. There, previous studies have demonstrated that the paleo-BIS experienced an abrupt retreat of ~ 200 km from an outer to a middle continental shelf grounding-line stillstand position (Fig. 1). Our analyses focused on the maximum rate and minimum duration for a paleo-grounding-line retreat that occurred between these two well-defined grounding-line stillstands.
The post-LGM retreat of the BIS from the WDB outer continental shelf
The WDB is approximately 100 km wide and 250 km long between Hayes and Houtz Banks. It extends from the continental shelf edge southward below the Ross Ice Shelf calving front (Fig. 1). In north–south crossings of the basin, a broad saddle rises more than 150 m above the regional grade across the width of the basin. South of the saddle, the continental shelf is foredeepened, i.e., landward dipping, with a maximum depth of ~ 600 m.
The BIS grounding line had already retreated from its maximum (LGM) position at the continental shelf edge prior to 14.7 ± 0.4 cal kyr BP8. Over the next three millennia, the BIS grounding line remained within 60 km of the continental shelf edge and deposited seven grounding-zone wedges (GZWs) all of which were more than 20 m thick8. The combined overlapping aggradational stack of GZWs constructed the bathymetric saddle (Fig. 1b). The crest of the saddle roughly marks the stillstand extent of BIS between 14.7 ± 0.4 and 11.5 ± 0.3 cal. kyr BP.
Isopach mapping of the stillstand GZWs and chronologic control indicate that the paleo-sediment flux of BIS averaged 1.7 × 108 m3 a−1 but the flux increased nearly sevenfold from 670 ± 2.0 × 107 to 4.7 ± 1.0 × 108 m3 a−1 following the ice shelf break up at 12.3 ± 0.6 cal kyr BP15. Despite ice shelf breakup, the paleo-BIS maintained its outer-continental shelf position due to the stabilizing effects of grounding-zone wedge sediment aggradation.
During the final stages of the stillstand, the ice-volume discharge exceeded the estimated average accumulation (35.6 ± 5 km3 a−1) and produced several centuries of a mass imbalance of − 45.4 ± 34 km3 a−1, equivalent to a basin-wide thinning rate of − 0.2 ± 0.14 ma−115. Ice volume discharge exceeded the balance velocity by a factor of two and implies ice mass imbalance of − 40 Gt a−1 for several centuries, which eventually triggered rapid grounding line retreat at ~ 11.5 ± 0.3 cal kyr BP.
Instead of seismically-resolvable GZWs, only small-scale moraine ridges mantle the foredeepened middle continental shelf (Figs. 2 and 3). The absence of seismically-resolvable GZWs south of the bathymetric saddle strongly suggests that there was no significant pause or re-advance as the grounding line retreated to Roosevelt Island16,17, which marks the site of a second post-LGM grounding-zone stillstand. The second stillstand ended at ~ 3.2 kyr BP18. These small sediment ridges were first noted in a previous study19 but the then-available data was not sufficient to recognize that they represent retreat along the eastern flank of a large evolving grounding-line embayment. The small-scale moraines on the WDB middle continental shelf are the focus of our study.
Results
The morainal ridges on the Whales Deep Basin middle continental shelf
A well-preserved succession of sub-parallel morainal ridges have an overall NNE to SSW trend in water depths ranging from 600 to 450 m from the central part of the WDB up along the flank of Houtz Bank (Fig. 2). The ridges extend from the crest of the bathymetric saddle to the southern end of the WDB. Several ridges have leading and trailing flanks that dip at angles up to 6° (Fig. 3). Ridge crests vary from peaked to flat topped or rounded. Some ridges pinch out along strike whereas for others, the leading and trailing edges of adjacent ridges converge and amalgamate and/or partly overlap (Fig. 2).
In the areas surveyed south of 77° 30’ S in the central and eastern side of the WDB, discontinuous crests ridges trend NNE-SSW16 but it is not possible to correlate these to the more continuous ridges to the north shown in Fig. 2 with the available data coverage (Fig. 1). Ridges are not observed on the western-most, dip-oriented transect of the WDB middle continental shelf16.
The longest individual ridges have crests that can be traced for up to 40 km. Forty ridges that extend more than 5 km are numbered where data coverage allows the stratigraphic relationships to be reasonably inferred for reference (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). Two general ridge types are recognized. Ridges 1 thru 28 are broader (averaging 1.5 km width in cross section) and have rounded crests (Figs. 3 and 4) with leading and trailing edges that mostly abut. Here, seafloor relief is low generally ranging between 4 and 10 m. Ridges 29–41 are discrete submarine landforms with less than 1 km cross sections that are mostly separated by flat-lying areas that average 1 km in width except where the ridges are amalgamated end to end. Seafloor relief for the younger ridges is generally less than 10 m.
A sharp, smoothly-varying subsurface reflection is observed on CHIRP data (Fig. 3) to mostly follow the regional bathymetric grade below ridges 19 to 41 (Fig. 4). The amplitude and continuity of the basal reflector is strongest where the overlying sediment is thin but the reflector dims significantly where the overlying sediment thickens above approximately 12 m. We infer that the basal reflector dims because of signal attenuation but continues throughout the WDB at a ~ 12-m minimum depth below the older ridges (see left hand side of Fig. 3).
Sediment volumes of ridges on the WDB middle continental shelf
We measured the cumulative stream-wise sediment volume (measured in m3/m) between the seafloor and the basal reflector on six cross sections oriented approximately perpendicular to the ridge crests (Supplemental Fig. 1, Table 1). The steam-wise sediment volume reported in Table 1 is reduced by 1 m3/m to account for this volume of post-glacial sediment17,20. The stream-wise sediment volumes were converted to a depositional duration for each cross section using both the lower- and upper-end stream-wise sediment fluxes (Table 1). For the lower-end sediment flux, the cross-section sediment volumes represent only a few centuries durations of deposition as the grounding line orthogonally retreated a distance of ~ 25 km. For that measured distance and duration, the retreat rate averages 100 ± 32 ma−1. At the upper-end sediment flux, the same stream-wise volumes represent shorter durations of deposition spanning up to nearly five decades (Table 1). For these minimum durations, the corresponding retreat rate averages ~ 700 ± 79 ma−1.
Discussion
Opening of the WDB embayment
The existence of a deep grounding-line embayment in the WDB was first hypothesized by Halberstadt et al.21. Their hypothesis was based on the orientation of megascale glacial lineations (MSGLs) in the Glomar Challenger and Little America basins that converge towards the WDB middle continental shelf (see arrows on Fig. 1b). Our mapping of the WDB ridge field confirms the embayment hypothesis and provides information as to how the opening proceeded. The location of the oldest morainal ridge shows that the embayment first opened in the deeper western side of the WDB middle continental shelf. Similarly-oriented, small-scale ridges are found even further east of our data19. The backstepping ridges record a succession of pauses during the retreat of the embayment’s eastern edge (Fig. 2). It is not possible to correlate any ridges across the entire WDB because of the limitations in the data coverage. Our map projections of the embayment’s western and southern flanks (Fig. 1) are mostly conjectural being based on the sparse swath-bathymetry transects and the regional bathymetry.
Constraints on the rate and duration of grounding-line retreat at 11.5 ± 0.3 cal kyr BP
The glacial geomorphology and sedimentology of the Antarctic continental shelf provide strong constraints on former grounding-line positions and retreat22,23. In the WDB, the start and end chronology of the large GZW that formed during the outer continental shelf grounding-zone stillstand is well constrained8. Stratigraphic super-position requires that the small-scale and back-stepped morainal ridges mantling the GZW topset formed during the subsequent retreat16. Investigators have long assumed that such small backstepped, grounding-zone features represent short-lived intervals of deposition during retreat24,25,26,27,28,29. Unfortunately, the general paucity of dateable material in glacial proximal deposits on the WDB middle continental shelf makes it difficult to accurately constrain the actual rates at which grounded ice contracted. A lone foraminiferal radiocarbon date was obtained well above subglacial sediment, from within the middle of the post-glacial sediment. The stratigraphic framework and core location 10 km north of the Ross Ice Shelf calving front requires only that grounded ice had retreated from the outer continental shelf saddle to Roosevelt Island prior to 8.7 ± 0.2 cal kyr BP8. Other radiocarbon dates from acid insoluble organic matter on the middle shelf of the WDB are considered suspect due to a mixing of contemporaneous and old carbon19. More recently obtained radiocarbon dates from C14–C18 fatty acids only constrain the retreat of the ice shelf20 and thus are not relevant for the prior retreat of grounded ice.
Unfortunately, the radiocarbon dates from marine core do not constrain by when the WDB embayment had fully opened. In the absence of more radiocarbon dates, our sediment flux approach provides end-member constraints on the minimum and maximum rates of grounding-line retreat because the cumulative ridge-field volume represents grounding-zone sedimentation measured orthogonal to the embayment’s eastern flank (Fig. 4). Generally speaking, sediment yield is higher in interglacials due to more rapid flow of warmer ice30,31. In the WDB, the post-LGM retreat was underway prior to ~ 14.7 cal kyr BP. The low-end sediment flux we used corresponds to a part of a post-LGM grounding-zone stillstand when the BIS flow was buttressed by an ice shelf15. In contrast, the upper-end sediment flux we used is the average for the latter part of the outer-continental shelf stillstand following an ice shelf breakup at ~ 12.3 cal kyr BP15. Our end-member sediment-flux analyses constrain the WDB retreat rates to have been between ~ 100 and ~ 700 ma−1 (Table 1). This range is faster than most reported paleo-retreat estimates11,12. The fastest paleo-retreat across the Amundsen/Bellingshausen inner continental shelf averaged 180 ma−113, which overlaps with the low-end of our WDB estimates. We dismiss the possibility that the paleo-sediment flux in the WDB was near the low end-member rate because iceberg furrows that orthogonally cross cut the sediment ridges require that full-draft icebergs calved at or near the retreating grounding zone32. In other words, the evidence requires either a weak to non-existent ice shelf buttressing existed as the grounding line retreated33, which is consistent with the high-end sediment flux estimate.
Sediment supply to the embayment’s eastern flank was probably derived from the MacAyeal Ice Stream (MIS) flowing through LAB21. The LAB and WDB are both underlain by Cenozoic sedimentary strata34 so the deglacial erosion rates would have been similar to the high end-member rate for the paleo-BIS. Moreover, the catchment for the MIS is larger than that of the BIS35 hence the paleo-BIS sediment flux is a reasonable proxy for that of the paleo-MIS. If we assume that the upper-end rate of ~ 700 ± 79 ma−1 applies to the entire grounding line retreat along the ~ 200-km centerline of the WDB (from the outer continental shelf saddle to Roosevelt Island stillstands positions), then the embayment opened in ~ 280 years.
A paleo-perspective for the ongoing grounding-zone oscillations
From a paleo-climate perspective, the opening of the WDB embayment and associated re-organization of ice flow represented a major post-LGM collapse of the WAIS. In either of the end-member scenarios we considered, the embayment records rapid retreat that lasted from several to a few tens of centuries. These data thus provide strong support for the modeling prediction that the current rapid retreat could also be sustained for centuries2. It is important to recognize that the modern-day retreat of ice streams have oscillated between both faster and slower rates in time and space36. During the past four decades, several large ice streams in West Antarctica have exhibited rates that exceeded even the upper-end paleo-retreat rate estimate. For example, Pine Island Glacier retreated at ~ 1000 ma−1 for nearly a decade between 1992 and 201137 but then retreat rate substantially decreased10. Likewise, in the Bellingshausen and Amundsen Sea sectors, several grounding zones experienced localized rapid retreat at rates ranging up to 1200 ma-1 between 2010 and 2016 whereas broader areas of the same regions have retreated at slower rates ranging from 100 to 300 ma−110. Between 1990 and 2015, retreat in the Bellingshausen sector proceeded with maximum rates of ~ 200 ma−1 whereas adjoining drainage areas in the Amundsen-Sea sector (e.g., Smith, and Kohler glaciers) experienced faster retreat5. In the largest catchment of the Amundsen Sea sector, the retreat of the Thwaites Glacier increased to 420 ma−1 by 201610. The opening of the WDB embayment may have also proceeded with similar oscillations like those observed for modern ice streams. Taken at face value, the decreased thickness of the younger ridges suggests that the retreat rate increased by ~ 70% from ~ 515 to ~ 880 ma−1 for that part of the embayment’s eastern flank surveyed (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). An acceleration of ice sheet retreat on the seaward sloping bed (the western flank of Houtz Bank) is counter-intuitive but the WDB is foredeepened along its north–south axis. The similarities between the modern and paleo retreat validates the concern that today’s oscillations in several sectors of the WAIS are in the early days of an ongoing collapse that, unless re-buttressed, could be sustained for centuries to come. Our data cannot be used to infer whether either melting by warm waters or other factors such as subglacial geology38 controlled the paleo-retreat. Nonethless, the comparison suggests that it is important for policy makers to consider the impacts of a sustained WAIS contraction.
Methods
We integrated the regional seismic stratigraphy39 with a new, detailed analysis of multibeam swath bathymetry survey and chirp profiles, plus extracted cross sections to reconstruct the pattern of the grounding line retreat from the WDB middle continental shelf. The multibeam data were collected with a hull-mounted Kongsberg EM122 swath bathymetric system from the Nathaniel B. Palmer RVIB during expedition NBP1502B. The EM122 operates at 12 kHz and records up to 432 beams. The maximum port- and starboard side angle is 75°. Time-depth corrections were performed from expendable bathythermographs that were taken at least once every 24 h. The initial multibeam was corrected and processed onboard with Teledyne CARIS HIPS and SIPS using a final CUBE function to create a 20 × 20 m resolution DEM raster. The multibeam DEM was then imported to QGIS 3.18 for geospatial interpretation, and calculation. Sub-bottom sonar was continuously co-acquired with the multibeam with a hull-mounted Knudsen 3260 3.5 kHz Chirp echosounder operated with a 64 ms sweep around 3.5 kHz, which provides a vertical resolution of 0.1 m and horizontal resolution of 10 m for a water depth of 500 m.
We analyzed the morainal-ridge dimensions, orientations, morphology and volume with ArcGIS and ArcMap software. The multibeam bathymetric survey was interpreted in ArcMap 10.7 as a raster datasheet. A prominent reflector is observed on CHIRP data to underlie the ridge field over approximately half of the area of interest.
A basal reflector observed to underlie part of the surveyed area on CHIRP data was correlated and mapped in Petrel 18.1. An initial subsurface map of the basal reflector was converted to meters depth below sea level with a velocity of 1650 ms−1. This surface was then exported as a series of point features and interpolated using an Intermediate Distance Weighting (IDW) interpolation within QGIS 3.18 creating a final DEM of the basal surface. Cross-sections were generated using the Line Interpretation Tool in the 3D Analysis Toolbox 7 on a common vertical and horizontal scale.
In QGIS 3.18, we clipped the seafloor DEM to the extent of the basal reflector DEM so that Raster calculations could be computed to the edges of that data set. The clipped seafloor DEM was subtracted from the basal reflector DEM to create an isopach of positive height between the basal reflector and seafloor.
Cross-sections across the isopach have x values corresponding to distance and y-values corresponding to height of sediment above the basal surface. The y-positions (vertical measure of sediment thickness between the seafloor and the basal reflector) were multiplied by the individual spacing between x positions and the areas were summed to estimate cross-sectional area of the ridge field moraines. We converted the cross-sectional areas to a stream-wise volume by multiplying the cross-section area by 1 m of the paleo-grounding line length measured perpendicular to the ridge crest.
We converted the lower- and upper-end BIS paleo sediment fluxes from Bart and Tulaczyk15 (2020) to a stream-wise quantity (in m3/m/a) by dividing their 3D flux value by 100,000 m (i.e., the width of the paleo-BIS). The lower-end sediment flux (670 ± 20 m3/m/a) corresponds to the average rate of grounding-zone deposition prior to ice shelf breakup (between 14.7 ± 0.4 and 12.3 ± 0.6 cal kyr BP). The upper-end sediment flux (4700 ± 100 m3/m/a) corresponds to the average rate sediment after the ice-shelf breakup (between 12.3 ± 0.6 and 11.5 ± 0.3 cal kyr BP). We used the stream-wise fluxes to estimate the elapsed time to deposit the morainal ridges along cross sections. The time elapsed to deposit the ridges is the quotient of a cross-section’s cumulative sediment volume and the paleo-BIS stream-wise sediment flux. We then estimated the grounding-line retreat rate by dividing the cross-section distance (from the oldest to the youngest ridge) by the time elapsed to deposit the ridges.
Data availability
The NBP1502B expedition data reported in the article is archived on the Marine Geoscience Data System (https://www.marine-geo.org/tools/search/entry.php?id=NBP1502).
References
Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., Morlighem, M., Seroussi, H. & Scheuchl, B. Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith, and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica, from 1992 to 2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3502–3509. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060140 (2014).
Joughin, I., Smith, B. E. & Medley, B. Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West Antarctica. Science 344, 735–738. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249055 (2014).
Favier, L. et al. Retreat of Pine Island Glacier controlled by marine ice-sheet instability. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2094 (2014).
Feldmann, J. & Levermann, A. Collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet after local destabilization of the Amundsen Basin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 14191–14196 (2015).
Christie, F. D. W., Bingham, R. G., Gourmelen, N., Tetti, S. F. B. & Muto, A. Four-decade record of pervasive grounding line retreat along the Bellingshausen margin of West Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5741–5749. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068972 (2016).
Rignot, E. et al. Four decades of Antarctic Ice sheet mass balance from 1979–2017. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 1095–1103. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812883116 (2019).
Kingslake, J. et al. Retreat and re-advance of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet during the Holocene. Nature 558, 430–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0208-x (2018).
Bart, P. J., DeCesare, M., Rosenheim, B. E., Majewski, W. & McGlannan, A. A centuries-long delay between a paleo-ice-shelf collapse and grounding-line retreat in the Whales Deep Basin, eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29911-8 (2018).
Gomez, N., Mitrovica, J. X., Huybers, P. & Clark, P. U. Sea level as a stabilizing factor for marine-ice-sheet grounding lines. Nat. Geosci. 3(12), 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1012 (2022).
Konrad, H. et al. Net retreat of Antarctic glacier grounding lines. Nat. Geosci. 11, 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0082-z (2018).
Shipp, S., Wellner, J. & Anderson, J. B. Retreat signature of a polar ice stream: Sub-glacial geomorphic features and sediments from the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 203, 277–304 (2002).
Smith, J. A. et al. Deglacial history of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet in the western Amundsen Sea Embayment. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 488–505 (2011).
Larter, R. D. et al. Reconstruction of changes in the Amundsen Sea and Bellingshausen Sea sector of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet since the Last Glacial Maximum. Quat. Sci. Rev. 100, 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.10.016 (2014).
Davey, F. & Nitsche, F. Bathymetric grid of the Ross Sea, Antarctica (Electronic format:). ftp://ftp.ldeo.columbia.edu/pub/fnitsche/RossSeaBathymetry/ (2005).
Bart, P. J. & Tulaczyk, S. A significant acceleration of ice volume discharge preceded a major retreat of a West Antarctic paleo–ice stream. Geology https://doi.org/10.1130/G46916.1 (2020).
Bart, P. J., Anderson, J. B. & Nitsche, F. Post-LGM grounding-line positions of the Bindschadler paleo ice stream in the Ross Sea Embayment, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 122, 1827–1844. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004259 (2017).
McGlannan, A. J., Bart, P. J., Chow, J. M. & DeCesare, M. On the influence of post-LGM ice shelf loss and grounding zone sedimentation on West Antarctic ice sheet stability. Mar. Geol. 392, 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2017.08.005 (2017).
Conway, H., Hall, B. L., Denton, G. H., Gades, A. M. & Waddington, E. D. Past and future grounding-line retreat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Science 286, 280–283 (1999).
Mosola, A. B. & Anderson, J. B. Expansion and rapid retreat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet in eastern Ross Sea: Possible consequence of over-extended ice stream. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 2177–2196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.12.013 (2006).
Yokoyama, Y. et al. Widespread collapse of the Ross Ice Shelf during the late Holocene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 2354–2359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516908113 (2016).
Halberstadt, A. R. W., Simkins, L. M., Greenwood, S. L. & Anderson, J. B. Past ice-sheet behaviour: Retreat scenarios and changing controls in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Cryosphere 10, 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1003-2016 (2016).
Anderson, J. B. et al. Ross Sea paleoice sheet drainage and deglacial history during and since the LGM. Quat. Sci. Rev. 100, 31–54 (2014).
Smith, J. A. et al. The marine geological imprint of Antarctic ice shelves. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13496-5 (2019).
De Geer, G. Ändmoränerna i trakten mellan Spånga och Sundbyberg. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh. 11, 395–396 (1889).
Larsen, E., Longva, O. & Follestad, B. A. Formation of De Geer moraines and implications for deglaciation dynamics. J. Quat. Sci. 6, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.339006040 (1991).
Dowdeswell, J. A., Ottesen, D., Evans, J., Cofaigh, C. Ó. & Anderson, J. B. Submarine glacial landforms and rates of ice-stream collapse. Geology 36, 819–822. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24808A.1 (2008).
Powell, R. D. & Alley, R. B. Grounding-line systems: processes, glaciological inferences and the stratigraphic record. In Geology and Seismic Stratigraphy of the Antarctic Margin, 2 Vol. 71 (eds Barker, P. F. & Cooper, A. K.) 169–187 (American Geophysical Union, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1029/ar071p0169.
Simkins, L. M., Greenwood, S. L. & Anderson, J. B. Diagnosing ice sheet grounding line stability from landform morphology. Cryosphere 12, 2707–2726. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2707-2018 (2018).
Prothro, L. O., Simkins, L. M., Majewski, W. & Anderson, J. B. Glacial retreat patterns and processes determined from integrated sedimentology and geomorphology records. Mar. Geol. 395, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2017.09.012 (2018).
Koppes, M. & Montgomery, D. R. The relative efficacy of fluvial and glacial erosion over modern to orogenic timescales. Nat. Geosci. 2, 644–647. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO616 (2009).
Fernandez, R. A., Anderson, J. B., Wellner, J. S. & Hallet, B. Timescale dependence of glacial erosion rates: A case study of Marinelli Glacier, Cordillera Darwin, southern Patagonia. J. Geophys. Res. 116, F01020. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001685 (2011).
Jakobsson, M. et al. Geological record of ice shelf break-up and grounding line retreat, Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica. Geology 39(7), 691–694. https://doi.org/10.1130/G32153 (2011).
Bassis, J. N., Berg, B., Crawford, A. J. & Benn, D. I. Transition to marine ice cliff instability controlled by ice thickness gradients and velocity. Science 372, 1342–1344. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABF6271 (2021).
Anderson, J. B. & Bartek, L. R. Cenozoic glacial history of the Ross Sea revealed by intermediate resolution seismic reflection data combined with drill site information. in The Antarctic Paleoenvironment: A Perspective on Global Change part 2 (eds Kennett, J. P. & Warnke, D. A.) (AGU Washington D.C., 1992).
Rignot, E. & Thomas, R. Mass balance of polar ice sheets. Science 297, 1502–1506 (2002).
Milillo, P. et al. Heterogeneous retreat and ice melt of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica. Sci. Adv. 5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau3433 (2019).
Park, J. W. et al. Sustained retreat of the Pine Island Glacier. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2137–2142. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50379 (2013).
Tinto, K. W. et al. Ross Ice Shelf response to climate driven by tectonic imprint on seafloor bathymetry. Nat. Geosci. 12, 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-370-2 (2019).
Danielson, M. & Bart, P. J. Topographic control on the post-LGM grounding zone locations of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet in the Whales Deep Basin, Eastern Ross Sea. Mar. Geol. 407, 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARGEO.2018.11.001 (2019).
Acknowledgements
PJB was supported by NSF research grant # 1246357.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.J.B. conceived the experiment and acquired the geophysical data during expedition NBP1502B. M.K. mapped the basal reflector and isopach thickness plus generated the cross sections used to calculate the stream-wise volumes. P.J.B. and M.K. wrote the manuscript and prepared by figures and tables.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bart, P.J., Kratochvil, M. A paleo-perspective on West Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat. Sci Rep 12, 17693 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22450-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22450-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.