Abstract
Dialysis adequacy is a known risk factor for mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. However, the optimal dialysis dose remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to explore the relationship between dialysis dose and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among MHD. We examined the associations of dialysis dose with mortality in a cohort (n = 558) of MHD patients from 31 December 2015 to 31 December 2020. Dialysis adequacy was assessed using baseline Single-pool Kt/Vurea (spKt/V), which was categorized into three groups, and the lowest dose group was used as the reference category. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. A total of 214 patients died (64.5% for CVD). Compared with the low-dose group, high-dose group could reduce the risk of all-cause mortality by 33% (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.98). Of note, when stratification by age, high-dose group was associated with both lower all-cause (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26–0.81) and CVD mortality (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.88) among patients with age below 65 years. When stratification by dialysis age, high-dose group was associated with decreased risk of CVD mortality (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.91) among patients with dialysis age over 60 months. spKt/V is a simple index of hemodialysis dose used in clinical practice and a useful modifiable factor in predicting the risk of death, especially in MHD patients under 65 years old or dialysis age more than 60 months.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global public health problem, and one of the major adverse outcomes is entering end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It had been revealed that the prevalence of ESRD was estimated as 0.07% (95% UI 0.06 to 0.08) in the world's population1, and the prevalence of hemodialysis (HD) patients in China was 379.1 per million population in 20172. The prevalence of ESRD continues to increase, besides, its prognosis is poor. In 2018, the adjusted mortality rate for MHD patients in the United States was 164.6 per thousand patient-years, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) was the most common cause of death, accounting for 42.2%3.
There are many risk factors affecting the survival of MHD patients, among which dialysis adequacy is one of the most important and actionable laboratory variables4,5. Dialysis adequacy measured by single-pool Kt/Vurea (spKt/V), which is urea clearance multiplied by duration of treatment session and normalized for urea distribution volume, is the most frequently applied measure of delivered dialysis dose6. The clinical practice guidelines in the United States, Europe, Japan and Canada recommend a target Kt/V dose of 1.2–1.4 for patients dialyzing thrice weekly7,8,9,10.
However, the relationship between the delivery dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality remains controversial. Several studies indicated that lower than the recommended Kt/V may increase mortality11,12,13,14,15. In a 5-year cohort study of more than 88,000 MHD patients in the United States conducted by Jessica E Miller et al., it had been reported that the greatest survival gain of higher HD dose was associated with a Kt/V approaching the 1.6 to 1.8 range16. In contrast, several studies had shown that increasing dialysis dose has no effect on survival gain and no predictive effect on cardiovascular death17,18,19. The hemodialysis (HEMO) study compared the outcomes of patients at high dialysis doses (target spKt/V approximately 1.65) with those at standard dialysis doses (target spKt/V approximately 1.25) and showed no significant differences in all-cause and cardiovascular deaths20. These inconsistencies may be attributed to the influence of different races, duration of follow-up, different nutritional status and other factors on Kt/V. Therefore, we hypothesis that higher dose of hemodialysis might lower the risk of death.
Up to now, few studies have examined the effects of different doses of spKt/V on all-cause death and cardiovascular death among MHD patients in China. Therefore, we conducted this long-term follow-up prospective cohort study to determine whether different dialysis dose could influence all-cause mortality and CVD mortality among MHD patients in a large hemodialysis center.
Materials and methods
Study population
A double-blind prospective cohort study was conducted at the Blood Purification Center of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, which is the largest hemodialysis center of the three provinces in northeast China. The inclusion criteria were hemodialysis patients aged ≥ 18 years, receiving stable hemodialysis for ≥ 12 weeks. Patients with acute infection, malignancy, or cardiovascular event in the previous 3 months were excluded. Patients dropped out or who were switched over to renal transplantation were also excluded. All patients underwent three hemodialysis sessions per week and each session was 4 h. The dialysate flow was 500 mL/min. The blood flow rate was between180 and 300 mL/min. Demographic and clinical characteristics in 2016 were collected. The observation study was conducted until 31 December 2020. All subjects enrolled in this research have given their informed consent which has been approved by the research ethics committee of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital.
Laboratory measurements
Blood samples were drawn during the midweek dialysis day. Venous blood samples for routine laboratory determinations were obtained immediately before the dialysis treatment and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. The post-dialysis samples was also collected. To avoid dilution to obtain the post-dialysis urea, the ultrafiltration rate was set to zero and blood pump rate was reduced to 100 ml/min. Fifteen seconds after reducing the blood flow, the sample was then drawn from the arterial needle tubing21. Hemoglobin was measured using sodium dodecyl lauryl sulfate. Other laboratory values were measured using an ADVIA 2400 Automatic Biochemistry Analyzer (Siemens, Germany). Laboratory parameters were measured quarterly, including hemoglobin, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, urea nitrogen, creatinine, potassium, sodium, chlorine, phosphorus, calcium, total cholesterols, and triglyceride. The baseline for each patient was the average calendar quarter of 3 times.
Dialysis adequacy was determined using the spKt/V which was calculated quarterly using the second generation equation of Daugirdas22, from pre- and post-hemodialysis blood urea, as follows: Kt/V = − ln(R − 0.008 × t) + [(4 − 3.5 × R) × UF/W], where R is the ratio of post-dialysis to pre-dialysis serum urea nitrogen concentration; t is duration of hemodialysis (in hours); UF is the amount of ultrafiltration (in liters) during the hemodialysis session; and W is the post-dialysis weight (in kilograms).
Outcome evaluation
For the duration of the study, the primary outcome for our analysis was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. All deaths were accurately recorded on TSS version 2.0 (Therapy Support Suite, Baden Humboldt, German), hospital records on BS-EAP (version 5.5; B-soft Enterprise Application Portal, Hang Zhou, China) and CNRDS (version 2017; Chinese National Renal Data System, Beijing, China). Cardiovascular mortality included deaths due to coronary events, sudden cardiac death, heart failure, myocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, and cerebrovascular accidents. Each patient were followed from entry until death or the earliest of the following censoring events: kidney transplantation, withdrew from the study, or the end of follow up.
Statistical analysis
spKt/V was categorized into three groups (the low-dose group: < 1.2, the middle-dose group: 1.2–1.4; the high-dose group: > 1.4)23, and the low-dose group was used as the reference category. The normality of all continuous variables was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk statistic. The results of continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (quartile1, quartile3), and intergroup comparisons were analyzed using one-way ANOVA for normally distributed data or the Kruskal–Wallis H tests for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables are expressed as the count with percentage, and differences between the two groups were examined using chi-square tests.
Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the curves were analyzed using the log-rank test. We carried out crude and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models to calculate hazards ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Schoenfeld residual test to verify the assumption of proportional hazards in the Cox analysis, and no violations were found (all P > 0.05). The models were without any adjustment (model 1); adjusted for age, gender and duration of dialysis (model 2); and additionally adjusted for heart failure, hemoglobin, albumin, creatinine, total cholesterol and primary disease on the basis of model 2 (model 3). In addition, we did subgroup analysis to assess potential effect modification by age (< 65 and ≥ 65 years) and duration of dialysis (< 36 months, 36–60 months and ≥ 60 months). All analyses were carried out using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was set at a P < 0.05 and based on a two-sided test.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the institutional medical ethics committee of the Dalian Municipal Central Hospital. All participants or a next of kin of the participants were provided written informed consent before data collection. The present study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Results
We excluded patients without spKt/V value and other variables (n = 77) and age below18 years (n = 1). A total of 558 patients on MHD were enrolled, with a median age of 58(47–68) years and 55.6% were males. The median follow-up duration was 61(34–61) months, during this period, 214 patients died [138(64.5%) cardiac]. The median dialysis age was 47 (18–78) months. The primary disease was 37.3% glomerulonephritis, 26.3% diabetic nephropathy, 19.2% hypertensive benign renal arteriosclerosis and 6.8% polycystic kidney, respectively.
The baseline characteristics of three groups are shown in Table 1. The patients were categorized into three groups according to baseline spKt/V: low dose group (spKt/V < 1.2); medium-dose group (1.2 ≤ spKt/V ≤ 1.4); and high-dose group (spKt/V > 1.4). There were differences in gender, primary disease, time on dialysis, hemoglobin, albumin, creatinine, potassium, phosphorus, calcium, total cholesterols, heart failure rate among three groups (P < 0.05).
For the total study cohort, Kaplan–Meier curves (Fig. 1) showed that the risk of all-cause death with baseline spKt/V was significantly different among three groups during the follow-up period (log-rank, P = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference between spKt/V and cardiovascular mortality (log-rank, P = 0.085) (Fig. 2). The results of Cox regression analyses were presented in Table 2. Overall, in the fully adjusted model, MHD patients in high-dose group had a reduced risk (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.98) of all-cause mortality compared to patients in low-does group. However, baseline spKt/V was not significantly related to cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.43–1.09).
We also performed subgroup analyses between dialyses dose and all-cause mortality by age. In the model 3, the hazard ratio decreased with increasing dialysis dose. High dialysis dose shows a significant protective effect on all-cause mortality (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26–0.81) and CVD mortality (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.88) in younger age patients (< 65 years). However, the similar result was not observed in older age patients (≥ 65 years) (Table 3).
In subgroup stratified by dialysis age (Table 4), compared with the low dose group, the high dose group significantly reduced the risk of CVD mortality by 57% (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.91) for patients with the dialysis age > 60 months.
Discussion
In the current study we evaluated the independent role of spKt/V and other important clinical variables in all-cause and CVD mortality among MHD patients. It showed the higher spKt/V level can reduce the all-cause mortality during the follow-up period while not for the CVD mortality. Moreover, in the patients whose age below 65 years, the higher spKt/V level not only reduce the risk of all-cause mortality but also CVD mortality. Similarly, patients whose dialysis age over 60 months may benefit from higher spKt/V levels which can reduce the risk of CVD mortality.
The effect of the spKt/V on mortality among patients who undergo MHD is somewhat controversial. Low spKt/V has been strongly associated with higher mortality in numerous studies11,12,24. A cohort study of 5784 MHD patients in Japan11 found that lower Kt/V was associated with elevated mortality, more so among women. An international prospective cohort study reported that for every 0.1 higher Kt/V, the RR of mortality was 2% lower25. Similarly, our study found that spKt/V > 1.4 has a protective effect on all-cause deaths in MHD patients. However, in contradiction to the above findings, the HEMO Study reported that increasing dialysis did not improve clinical outcome in MHD patients26. This might be due to different race, spKt/V levels and research period. The mean spKt/V of high-dose group in the HEMO study is 1.67, while the standard of our study is more than 1.4, which is far lower than the HEMO study. Due to the different race, Asians often could not achieve extremely high spKt/V. What’s more, the HEMO study, conducted between 1995 and 2000, was 20 years earlier than our study. As time progresses, the improvement of dialysis technology and the improvement of patients' nutritional status may also make differences.
As for CVD mortality, a prospective study from Brazil27 found that higher hemodialysis dose was not associated with CVD mortality among MHD patients, which was similar with our results. However, there were several previous studies showed that higher Kt/V can reduce CVD mortality in MHD patients28,29. Bloembergen WE et.al. analyzed 2479 MHD patients in America reporting that for each 0.1 higher Kt/V, the death due to cardiac causes was 12% lower28.The difference may be due to different races and years of research (1996 versus 2020). Similarly, a prospective randomized controlled study of twice-weekly MHD patients in Shanghai showed that the incidence of CVD in the high-dose group were decreased29. The difference may be due to the frequency of dialysis. Compared with three times a week, infrequent HD treatment exposes patients to several risk factors for cardiovascular events, including hypervolemia, and hyperkalemia. The high-dose group can better improve the risk factors of appeal30.
Many studies showed increasing spKt/V, which means adequate dialysis, resulted in better survival31,32,33. Inadequate dialysis was associated with poorer nutritional status34 and higher degree of inflammation35. Serum albumin and hemoglobin levels were significantly improved after increasing the MHD dose36. As we all know, nutritional status, especially serum albumin, is strongly related to the mortality in MHD patients37,38. And low-dose dialysis may increase the accumulation of uremic toxins, resulting in suppression of red blood cell production and low response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents39,40. In addition, spKt/V was negatively correlated with left ventricular mass index and an independent risk factor for Left ventricular hypertrophy41. This may be related to the control of volume overload, anemia and hypertension by increasing spKt/V. And higher spKt/V can better remove low molecular weight uremic toxins, such as asymmetric dimethylarginine, which can cause uremia Cardiomyopathy and endothelial dysfunction42.
Our study had several strengths. First, the sample size is large compared to previous studies27,33,43, which allowed us to explore the associations between Kt/V levels, and all-cause and CVD mortality in MHD patients with greater accuracy. Second, this study had a relatively long follow-up time (60 months) to prospectively observe the all-cause and CVD mortality in MHD patients. Third, we used the mean value of the three spKt/V measurements in the first year of follow-up as the baseline value of spKt/V, which can more accurately reflect the baseline level of patients and reduce measurement error. Fourth, subgroup analysis of age and duration of dialysis was also carried out. These results have certain guiding significance for clinical work.
However, we truly have several potential limitations in this study. Firstly, due to the limitation of data, we failed to cover all confounding factors which could influence the morbidity from different aspects, such as the cardiovascular biomarkers like N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, inflammation factors like C-reactive protein, smoke, drink, body composition, dietary factors, residual kidney function and so on. Besides, there may be unmeasured confounding, including time-dependent confounding factors. Secondly, we use the mean value of spKt/V during the first year of follow-up as a factor, which might be result in immortal time bias. However, we found that the spKt/V value did not change with time, which avoided this bias to a certain extent. Thirdly, just as other cohort studies44,45, the exclusion of drop-out subjects may be a source of bias due to study design. Finally, the patients we followed up were all from one single center, which made the conclusion less representative. Multicenter studies covering broader confounding factors should be carried out in the future.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the present cohort study indicated that higher level of spKt/V might could improve the MHD patient's survival rate, particularly in the patients whose age below 65 years or the duration of dialysis more than 60 months. Our findings may aim in developing guidance for dialysis dose in patients on MHD. Future large prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- CKD:
-
Chronic kidney disease
- CVD:
-
Cardiovascular disease
- CIs:
-
Confidence intervals
- ESRD:
-
End-stage renal disease
- HRs:
-
Hazard ratios
- HD:
-
Hemodialysis
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- MHD:
-
Maintenance hemodialysis
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- spKt/V:
-
Single-pool Kt/Vurea
References
Global Burden of Disease Study. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 395(10225), 709–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3 (2020).
Zhao, X. et al. Baseline data report of the China dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). Sci. Rep. 11(1), 873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79531-4 (2021).
Johansen, K. L. et al. US renal data system 2020 annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 77(4 Suppl 1), A7-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.01.002 (2021).
Lacson, E. J., Wang, W., Hakim, R. M., Teng, M. & Lazarus, J. M. Associates of mortality and hospitalization in hemodialysis: Potentially actionable laboratory variables and vascular access. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.031 (2009).
Tentori, F. et al. Which targets in clinical practice guidelines are associated with improved survival in a large dialysis organization?. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18(8), 2377–2384. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006111250 (2007).
Gotch, F. A. & Sargent, J. A. A mechanistic analysis of the National cooperative dialysis study (NCDS). Kidney Int. 28(3), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1985.160 (1985).
KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 66(5), 884–930. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015 (2015).
Tattersall, J. et al. EBPG guideline on dialysis strategies. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22(Suppl 2), n21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfm022 (2007).
Watanabe, Y. et al. Japanese society for dialysis therapy clinical guideline for “Maintenance hemodialysis: Hemodialysis prescriptions”. Ther. Apher. Dial. 19(Suppl 1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.12294 (2015).
Jindal, K. et al. Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17(3 Suppl 1), S1-27. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2005121372 (2006).
Kimata, N. et al. Gender, low Kt/V, and mortality in Japanese hemodialysis patients: Opportunities for improvement through modifiable practices. Hemodial. Int. 18(3), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12142 (2014).
AlSahow, A. et al. Kt/V: Achievement, predictors and relationship to mortality in hemodialysis patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: Results from DOPPS (2012–18). Clin. Kidney J. 14(3), 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz195 (2021).
Ossareh, S., Farrokhi, F. & Zebarjadi, M. Survival of patients on hemodialysis and predictors of mortality: A single-centre analysis of time-dependent factors. Iran J. Kidney Dis. 10(6), 369–380 (2016).
Lertdumrongluk, P. et al. Dose of hemodialysis and survival: A marginal structural model analysis. Am. J. Nephrol. 39(5), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362285 (2014).
AlYousef, A. et al. Hemodialysis delivery, dialysis dose achievement, and vascular access types in hemodialysis patients from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries enrolled in the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study phase 5 (2012–2015). Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 27(6 Suppl 1), S42-50. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.194889 (2016).
Miller, J. E. et al. Association of hemodialysis treatment time and dose with mortality and the role of race and sex. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 55(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.08.007 (2010).
Soleymanian, T. et al. Predictors of clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients: A multicenter observational study. Iran J. Kidney Dis. 11(3), 229–236 (2017).
Iseki, K., Tozawa, M. & Takishita, S. Determinants of prescribed dialysis dose and survival in a cohort of chronic hemodialysis patients. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 7(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-003-0242-2 (2003).
Selim, G. et al. Brain natriuretic peptide between traditional and nontraditional risk factors in hemodialysis patients: Analysis of cardiovascular mortality in a two-year follow-up. Nephron. Clin. Pract. 119(2), c162–c170. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327615 (2011).
Eknoyan, G. et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347(25), 2010–2019. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021583 (2002).
Clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 48(Suppl 1), S2-90. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.03.051 (2006).
Daugirdas, J. T. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: An analysis of error. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4(5), 1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.V451205 (1993).
Leypoldt, J. K. & Cheung, A. K. Revisiting the hemodialysis dose. Semin. Dial. 19(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139X.2006.00132.x (2006).
Held, P. J. et al. The dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality. Kidney Int. 50(2), 550–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1996.348 (1996).
Saran, R. et al. Longer treatment time and slower ultrafiltration in hemodialysis: Associations with reduced mortality in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 69(7), 1222–1228. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000186 (2006).
Locatelli, F. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(15), 1491–1494 (2003).
Almeida, F. A., Machado, F. C., Moura, J. J. & Guimaraes, A. C. Global and cardiovascular mortality and risk factors in patients under hemodialysis treatment. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 94(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2010005000003 (2010).
Bloembergen, W. E. et al. Relationship of dose of hemodialysis and cause-specific mortality. Kidney Int. 50(2), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1996.349 (1996).
Fan, Q. et al. Prognostic value of the delivery dialysis dose on twice-weekly hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 45(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1159/000453043 (2017).
Rhee, C. M. et al. Infrequent dialysis: A new paradigm for hemodialysis initiation. Semin. Dial. 26(6), 720–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12133 (2013).
Sun, Y. et al. Association of dose and frequency on the survival of patients on maintenance of hemodialysis in China: A Kaplan–Meier and cox proportional hazard model analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. 24, 5329–5337. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909404 (2018).
Ramirez, S. P. et al. Dialysis dose scaled to body surface area and size-adjusted, sex-specific patient mortality. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7(12), 1977–1987. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00390112 (2012).
Lu, J. et al. The relationship between survival rate and intradialytic blood pressure changes in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Ren. Fail. 39(1), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2017.1305407 (2017).
Schulman, G. The dose of dialysis in hemodialysis patients: Impact on nutrition. Semin. Dial. 17(6), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17609.x (2004).
Valga, F., Monzon, T., Vega-Diaz, N., Rodriguez-Perez, J. C. & Ruiz-Santana, S. Inflammation and hemodialysis adequacy: Are C-reactive protein levels influenced by dialysis dose?. Nefrologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2021.06.001 (2021).
Azar, A. T., Wahba, K., Mohamed, A. S. & Massoud, W. A. Association between dialysis dose improvement and nutritional status among hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 27(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1159/000099836 (2007).
Leavey, S. F., Strawderman, R. L., Jones, C. A., Port, F. K. & Held, P. J. Simple nutritional indicators as independent predictors of mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 31(6), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9631845 (1998).
Owen, W. J., Lew, N. L., Liu, Y., Lowrie, E. G. & Lazarus, J. M. The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 329(14), 1001–1006. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199309303291404 (1993).
Lin, Y. F. et al. Comparison of residual renal function in patients undergoing twice-weekly versus three-times-weekly haemodialysis. Nephrology 14(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.01016.x (2009).
Zhang, M. et al. Association of initial twice-weekly hemodialysis treatment with preservation of residual kidney function in ESRD patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 40(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365819 (2014).
Cao, X. et al. BMI, spKt/V, and SBP but not DBP are related to LVH in Chinese maintenance hemodialysis patients. Ren. Fail. 33(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2011.559299 (2011).
Zoccali, C. et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac remodeling and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 62(1), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00437.x (2002).
Singh, S. et al. Ten-year patient survival on maintenance haemodialysis: Association with treatment time and dialysis dose. J. Nephrol. 26(4), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.5301/jn.5000234 (2013).
Kuchenbaecker, K. B. et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 317(23), 2402–2416. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7112 (2017).
Barbiellini, A. C. et al. Association between age at diabetes onset and subsequent risk of dementia. JAMA 325(16), 1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4001 (2021).
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Dalian Key Medical Specialty Dengfeng Project (2022ZZ231 and 2022ZZ243 to Shu-Xin Liu; 2022ZZ236 to Shuang Zhang).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.-X.L.: Study conceptualization and design; J.X., Z.-H.W., Y.Z., X.-N.W., L.-L.Y., S.-N.W., J.-N.S., X.-N.Z., C.D., S.-F.Y. and Y.-N.Z.: Data collection; S.Z.: Data cleaning and discrepancy checks; S.Z. and S.-X.L.: Analytic strategy; S.Z., Z.-Z.W., X.-Y.Y.: Analysis and interpretation of data; S.-X.L.: Manuscript preparation; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, SX., Wang, ZH., Zhang, S. et al. The association between dose of hemodialysis and patients mortality in a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep 12, 13708 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17943-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17943-0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.