This study investigated the effect of attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy on satisfaction with leisure activities and level of happiness in Korean caregivers for young children. Data were collected from 864 participants (397 men and 467 women) using the 2018 National Leisure Activity Survey (NLAS). The results showed that there were no significant differences between male and female caregivers in terms of satisfaction with leisure policy, satisfaction with leisure activities, and level of happiness. Women had more positive attitudes toward leisure. Satisfaction with leisure activities mediated the relationship between attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and level of happiness; there were no significant differences between men and women with regard to the variables. The study suggests that attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy promote the happiness of Korean caregivers for young children.
In the process of achieving economic development, South Korea has prioritized the sense of accomplishment that comes through work1; leisure activities used to be thought of only as ancillary means of improving labor productivity. Over the past decades, many Koreans have had negative attitudes about leisure activities that did not seem productive. Due to rapid economic development led by the government, incomes increased and the standard of living greatly improved, but Koreans’ satisfaction with life and their level of happiness remained low compared to other countries2,3,4. Most Koreans did not feel happy while engaging in leisure activities.
As Koreans have recently become increasingly interested in the topic of happiness, leisure has come into focus as a way of improving well-being1,2. Growth in the number of leisure-related studies has contributed to life satisfaction for individuals5,6 and families7,8,9, and the body of Korean literature related to the effects of leisure on life satisfaction is also growing2,10,11. However, previous leisure studies focused on participation in leisure activities and its effect on life satisfaction, and studies related to leisure attitudes and leisure policies were insufficient in number.
Leisure activities have a great impact on family health as well as personal happiness and life satisfaction of those who care for infants and toddlers12. With the knowledge that leisure is an important part of family caregivers' lives13, it seems appropriate to explore how the perception of leisure experiences and policies affect their leisure satisfactions. Although recent studies attempt to understand the parenting environment and psychological needs of parents through leisure, leisure-related studies on parents of young children are relatively scarce14. Additionally, most Korean researchers have indicated that participation in leisure activities has been associated with a higher quality of life among Korean adolescents15, college students16, and older adults17, but few researchers have studied caregivers for young children in Korea. Therefore, it would be meaningful to explore the relationships among attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, satisfaction with leisure activities, and happiness in Korean caregivers for young children.
Attitude toward leisure
Veblen regarded leisure as a symbol of wealth and an activity different from work and/or unproductively spent time18. Similarly, some researchers have approached leisure (as opposed to work hours) as a time to pursue pleasure, engage in voluntary activities, and experience a feeling of freedom19,20,21. Others viewed leisure’s primary function as preparation for work, or even as compensation for the alienating effect of work22. Attitude toward leisure is defined as a willingness or predisposition to engage in leisure activities23. Attitudes toward leisure include beliefs, feelings, perceptions, knowledge, and behavioral components associated with leisure24. In Korea, attitude toward leisure is usually assessed based on individuals’ perceptions or beliefs about participating in leisure activities. These belief systems have changed because of social changes in Korea1. In the past, leisure was recognized and enjoyed as a subsidiary means to increase the production and efficiency of labor; however, leisure is now viewed as something that contributes to personal happiness and life satisfaction1,25,26.
One’s attitude toward leisure affects one’s satisfaction with one’s leisure time and activities. Some studies have shown that a positive attitude toward leisure is positively associated with a desire to participate in leisure activities27, which results in the development of satisfaction with leisure activities and time28,29. When an individual’s perceptions or emotions about leisure are positive, their satisfaction with leisure activities and time and with quality of life improve30. In addition, other Korean research supports the idea that a positive attitude toward leisure is positively correlated with satisfaction with leisure activities and time among college students29,31.
Satisfaction with leisure policy
Leisure policy acknowledges the demand for leisure and systematically devises a plan to support leisure activities in accordance with individuals’ basic rights1. Leisure policies come from leisure-related government agencies that aim to increase people’s participation in leisure, create leisure spaces, administrate leisure policy processes, and secure leisure environments32. Since 1960, when overcoming national poverty was a top priority, Korea has pursued a labor-intensive production policy that relies on limited human resources. After growing as a labor-production-oriented society, Korea has established various leisure policies to reduce working hours and expand leisure time and activities to improve the quality of life for individuals1. For example, adopting policies such as five days or 52 hours of work per week and expanding the alternative holiday system increased individual leisure activities33.
Although environments where people can engage in leisure have improved and more public leisure facilities have been created through these policies, questions have arisen about the effect of these policies on the satisfaction that comes from leisure in Korea. The goal of the leisure policies was to improve the quality of life of individuals, but in practical terms, it was a supplier-oriented policy that did not take into account those who participate in leisure activities in Korea1. Therefore, the recognition and the evaluation of leisure policies have become important research topics as they relate to satisfaction with leisure activities. Previous studies related to leisure policy satisfaction have suggested the necessity of leisure policy evaluation through theoretical implications and examples34,35. Some Korean research found a positive relationship between satisfaction with leisure policy and satisfaction with leisure activities1,36, but related empirical studies are still scarce.
Satisfaction with leisure and happiness
Satisfaction with leisure is understood as an individual’s positive evaluation of participating in leisure activities27. According to Beard and Ragheb, satisfaction with leisure is defined as positive personal perceptions or feelings derived from participating in leisure activities and resulting in the fulfillment of personal needs37,38. Happiness is considered essential to an individual’s life. According to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, a happy life is a virtuous life39. The term happiness is defined as “positive affect and subjective well-being”40,41 and is influenced by genetics, circumstances, and attitudes42. The concept of happiness is also related to life satisfaction or evaluation, subjective well-being, eudaimonia (i.e., psychological well-being), quality of life, or affect43.
A considerable amount of literature has shown a positive association between satisfaction with leisure activities and psychological well-being, life satisfaction, or happiness. According to Freire and Teixeira, leisure satisfaction has a direct effect on self-esteem, satisfaction with life, and psychological well-being44. Kaya found a positive association between satisfaction with leisure activities and happiness among college students45. Leisure satisfaction influences life satisfaction in Korean adolescents46. Wang et al.’s study showed, with regard to online games, a significant positive relationship between the physiological and aesthetic elements of leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction for adolescents47. All these studies provide empirical evidence that leisure satisfaction enhances happiness.
Recently, leisure-related research in non-Western countries has been increasing, but few studies have researched leisure in the context of caregivers in Korea. Leisure has had an impact on the lives of young children and their caregivers48,49. The happiness of caregivers affects children’s well-being and social and emotional development50. Leisure was found to play a role in ultimately improving the psychological satisfaction of parents and enhancing family health by preventing and/or alleviating stress14. Therefore, research on the relationship between leisure and happiness in Korean caregivers for young children is essential.
Hypothesized model of attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, satisfaction with leisure activities, and happiness
Based on previous studies, it is plausible that one’s attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy would lead to satisfaction with leisure activities and that satisfaction, in turn, would increase happiness. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the hypothesized full mediational model in which attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and happiness are fully mediated by satisfaction with leisure activities. Level of happiness has been reported differently by the different sexes. Subjective well-being was shown to be higher in women than in men, but the difference is not known to be significant51. Some Korean studies have shown gender differences in levels of happiness52,53. The present study sought to explore gender differences in the latent variables and the mediating pathway from attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy to level of happiness, via satisfaction with leisure activities; structural equation modeling (SEM) with a nationally representative sample of Korean caregivers for young children (see Fig. 1), latent mean analysis (LMA), and multigroup structural model analysis were used for the purpose. The results would increase researchers’ understanding of the link between leisure and happiness and provide useful insights to improve the relationship between Korean caregivers and the young children in their care.
This study uses secondary data analysis from the 2018 National Leisure Activity Survey (NLAS), which collected data from a nationally representative sample of Korean individuals consisting of 10,496 participants over 15 years of age living in 17 cities and provinces. The NLAS involved a set of assessment modules designed by the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism to provide trend data reflecting changes in lifestyle and quality of life; the analysis reflects the status of leisure activities affecting demand for leisure according to various and changing domestic leisure environments. The NLAS consisted of a one-on-one interview by an investigator, and the survey period was from October 1, 2018, to November 30, 2018. The 2018 NLAS was performed under approval from Statistics Korea (Approval Number 113014). The raw data is publicly available from the Statistics Korea website (https://mdis.kostat.go.kr/index.do).
For the current study, participants were selected from the respondents in the 2018 NLAS. The selected families consisted of caregivers (parents, mothers, fathers, grandparents, grandmothers, and grandfathers) aged 20–70 years with a preschool-aged child or children (3–6 years old). The sample included 864 participants (397 men and 467 women). The proportions of participants in their 20 s, 30 s, 40 s, 50 s, 60 s, and 70 s or older were 5.1%, 68.1%, 25.2%, 0.9%, 0.6%, and 0.1%, respectively. Of the total sample, 369 (42.7%) resided in metropolitan cities, 314 (36.3%) in medium-size cities, and 181 (20.9%) in rural areas. Participants’ education level varied as follows: 5 (0.6%) had completed middle school, 227 (26.3%) had completed high school, and 632 (73.1%) had a Bachelor’s degree or a graduate degree. They participated in six leisure activities—cultural and art-viewing activities, cultural and artistic participation activities, tourism, hobbies and entertainment, relaxation, and social and other activities (a category that included 87 kinds of leisure activities). The leisure types are presented in Table 1.
Attitude toward leisure
Attitude toward leisure measured the perception of leisure, using two items. Participants were asked to respond to the following questions: “Do you think leisure activities are an essential requirement for life?” and ““Do you think leisure activities have a positive effect on your life?” on a scale of 1 to 7 (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for attitude toward leisure was 0.841.
Satisfaction with leisure policy
Satisfaction with leisure policy measured the satisfaction with the legal system and the infrastructure for leisure, using two items. Participants were asked to respond to the following questions: “Are you satisfied with the legal system related to leisure activities?” and “Are you satisfied with the leisure infrastructure?” on a scale of 1 to 7 (1 = very dissatisfied, 7 = very satisfied). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for satisfaction with leisure policy was 0.881.
Satisfaction with leisure activities
Satisfaction with leisure activities was measured using two items. Participants were asked to respond to the statements, “Are you satisfied with your overall leisure life?” and “Are you satisfied with the leisure activities you have participated in most in the past year?” on a scale of 1 to 7 (1 = very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied). The reliability coefficient, using Cronbach’s alpha for leisure satisfaction was 0.734.
Happiness was measured using a single item. Participants were asked to respond to the question, “How happy do you think you are now?” on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = very unhappy, 10 = very happy).
Overview of analysis
For this study analysis, PASW 18.0 was used for the general characteristics of the participants and leisure activities, reliability, and correlation analysis of the measurement instruments. AMOS 18.0 was used for SEM to provide the hypothesized structural relationships among latent variables. This study evaluated the full mediation model of the relationship between attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, satisfaction with leisure activities, and happiness. In addition, this study conducted LMA and multigroup structural analysis to find differences between male and female groups54. While t-tests, ANOVA (analysis of variance), and MANOVA (multivariate analysis of variance) are typical methods for testing mean differences, LMA has the advantage of verifying the significance of mean differences between groups in consideration of measurement error55. LMA can estimate the latent mean for males; the latent mean for females was set at 0. For LMA, invariance tests (e.g., configural invariance, metric invariance, and scalar invariance) were conducted in the hierarchical ordering of nested models. After the assessment of LMA was complete, a multigroup structural analysis was performed. The model fit with the maximum likelihood (ML) method and was evaluated using two relative-model fit criteria (Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] and comparative fit index [CFI]), one absolute model fit criterion (root mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA]), and the chi-squared difference test (△χ2 test).
Ethics approval and informed consent
Ethical review for this study were waived because the data is secondary data (Approval No. is 113014). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Descriptive statistics with mean, standard deviations, skewness, kurtosis, and correlations for all variables are shown in Table 2. Overall, attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy showed a positive correlation with satisfaction with leisure activities in both male and female caregivers. Two variables associated with attitude toward leisure were not correlated with satisfaction with leisure policy variables, but satisfaction with leisure activities was correlated with happiness in both groups. All significant correlations were positive. This is consistent with previous studies showing that attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy are positively correlated with satisfaction with leisure activities1,28,29,31,36, and that satisfaction with leisure activities is positively related to happiness13,44,45,46,47. All values for skewness and kurtosis were within the range of \(\pm\) 2 and \(\pm\) 4, respectively, for normal distribution55,56.
Construct validity test and fitness test of the model
Convergent validity considers how closely measurement instruments are related to the other variables of one latent variable. Construct reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) were calculated to measure convergent validity57,58. The values of CR above 0.7 and AVE above 0.5 are acceptable. In this study, convergent validity was acceptable because the values of CR were 0.891–0.896, with the value for leisure satisfaction close to 0.7, and the AVE values were 0.577–0.869. Discriminant validity is also acceptable because the AVE values are greater than the shared variance (i.e., squared correlation)57. Values around 0.08 are considered acceptable for RMSEA, while values of 0.05 are considered good; values of 0.90 or greater are considered good for TLI and CFI57,59. Thus, the model fit in the current study was acceptable (female group: χ2 (df = 11, N = 467) = 29.736, p = 0.002, TLI = 0.963, CFI = 0.981, RMSEA = 0.060, male group: χ2 (df = 11, N = 397) = 28.832, p = 0.002, TLI = 0.954, CFI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.064).
Construct equivalence test
All measurement models for assessing the three latent variables were compared to verify the configural invariance. Because the metric invariance model is an inherent model in the baseline model, it can be verified through the differences in χ2 using the difference in degrees of freedom between the two models. The fit of Model 1, the baseline model, shows high fit indices (see Table 3) (χ2 [df = 18, N = 864] = 41.795, p < 0.001, TLI = 0.968, CFI = 0.986, RMSEA = 0.039). To verify metric invariance, which has equal factor loadings on variables across groups, the χ2 values and the degree of freedom of Model 2, the metric invariance model, were compared against the baseline model, configural invariance. The difference between the χ2 values of the baseline model and the metric invariance model was not statistically significant at α = 0.05 (△χ2 [3, N = 864] = 2.856) (see Table 3); thus, metric invariance was established. TLI and RMSEA in the metric invariance model were accepted because the difference in the model fit was small (△TLI = 0.005, △RMSEA = -0.003). This result indicates that the measurement tool could be applied equally to both groups. Since the metric invariance model (Model 2) was established, the next step, scalar invariance, was evaluated. The scalar invariance model (Model 3) was not established because of a statistically significant result at α = 0.05 (△χ2 [6, N = 864] = 20.118). However, the fit indices for scalar invariance did not become worse than those for metric invariance (△TLI = − 0.007, △RMSEA = 0.004), and the scalar invariance model (Model 3) was accepted55. The results showed that the measurement instruments and intercepts could apply equally to both groups. The observed mean differences in this study could reflect the differences between the groups for the latent variables.
Latent mean analysis (LMA)
Since configural, metric, and scalar invariance assumptions were all verified, LMA was carried out to see gender differences across the three latent variables (i.e., attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and satisfaction with leisure activities) (see Table 4). The homogeneity of variance assumption was supported (△χ2 [3, N = 864] = 14.837, p < 0.001, △TLI = −0.006, △RMSEA = 0.004) according to the TLI, RMSEA, and χ2 difference tests comparing Models 3 and 4 (see Table 3). Thus, the d values were calculated using common standard deviations (see Table 4). Differences in attitudes toward leisure were defined as not small (d = 0.393) based on Cohen’s guidelines54,60. The results of the t-test showed no significant difference in level of happiness, an observed variable, between the female and male groups (t = -0.201, p = 0.841).
Multigroup structural model analysis
In the multigroup structural model analysis, as a result of measuring the fitness of the path model, in which all factors for each latent variable were set the same way, the mediated model indicated a good fit with the sample data (χ2 [df = 25, N = 864] = 62.374, p < 0.001, TLI = 0.964, CFI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.042). Table 5 presents the parameter estimates for both groups. To test the significant differences between path coefficients that might exist in the female and male groups, three models with equality constraints on the three path coefficients in the model were compared with the baseline model. The model fit remained almost unchanged, even if the equality constraint was applied to all path coefficients (χ2 [df = 42, N = 864] = 1754.106, p < 0.001, TLI = 0.964, CFI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.041; △TLI = 0.000, △CFI = 0.002, △RMSEA = 0.001) (see Table 6). There were no statistically significant differences between the female and male groups in the equality constraints on each path. Attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy had a strong influence on satisfaction with leisure activities; in turn, satisfaction with leisure activities had a strong influence on level of happiness for both groups. Figure 2 presents the model with equality constraints on path coefficients.
While a substantial body of research on leisure has focused on the benefits of leisure activities among adolescents30,46,61, college students29, and adults62 in Korea, it is meaningful to examine the benefits of leisure for Korean caregivers of young children because they have less chance to engage in leisure activities while parenting in Korea. In addition, caregivers’ happiness plays a key role in children’s well-being52. Therefore, the current study aimed to explore how the effects of attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy transferred to caregivers’ happiness via the mediation of satisfaction with leisure activities using SEM. The study also used LMA and multigroup structural analysis to explore gender differences associated with the variables and pathways.
The study results showed that a more positive attitude toward leisure and higher levels of satisfaction with leisure policy were associated with higher satisfaction with leisure activities, which was linked to higher levels of happiness. Consistent with previous research, the results support the idea that attitude toward leisure is positively related to satisfaction with leisure activities28,29,30,31,63, and satisfaction with leisure policy is positively correlated with satisfaction with leisure activities1,36. In addition, the association between satisfaction with leisure activities and level of happiness was consistent with previous research showing that greater satisfaction with leisure activities is related to greater life satisfaction and psychological well-being28,44,45,46,47. This finding suggests that caregivers for young children who had a more positive attitude toward leisure and greater satisfaction with leisure policy considered their satisfaction with their leisure activities to be beneficial for their happiness. This empirical evidence shows that satisfaction with leisure activities mediates the aspects of attitudes toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy that lead to greater levels of happiness. These findings are new, and they could reinforce the positive association between attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy and greater happiness via satisfaction with leisure activities, especially for Korean caregivers for young children. Prior studies evaluated young adults (e.g., adolescents and college students), but this result uncovered a positive relationship in Korean family pairs. The results of this study, on the other hand, underline the important relationship between leisure experience (i.e., attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and satisfaction with leisure activities) and level of happiness, for which there has been little research in Korea.
The LMA results supported the gender difference in only one variable: attitude toward leisure; the difference was not small, given the Cohen’s effect size (d-value = 0.393). In the multigroup structural analysis, attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy had a significant indirect effect on level of happiness through the mediator of satisfaction with leisure activities for both groups; this outcome reflects full mediation. These findings indicated that female caregivers for young children had a more positive attitude toward leisure than male caregivers, but significant differences between path coefficients did not exist in either group. In general, women have more free time than men, but women’s participation in leisure activities is insufficient because of the burden of child care and familial duties. As a result, the quality of women’s leisure time is lower than that of men64. However, it can be assumed from the current study that the proportion of women participating in leisure activities is increasing because women’s household labor has been decreasing in Korean families. These findings indicate that, although Korean females are still subject to traditional gender roles in marriage65, their attitudes toward leisure can be positively enhanced.
In addition, the present findings underline the importance of satisfaction with leisure policy, as well as having a positive attitude toward leisure, for both female and male caregivers. In order to enhance an individual’s life satisfaction, not only is personal recognition of the importance of leisure time required, but also satisfaction with leisure policies in the legal system (e.g., paid parental leave or financial support for families with children) and leisure infrastructure. Such legislation and the establishment of leisure infrastructure are important to caregivers for young children because their satisfaction with leisure activities from government-led support tends to influence their children’s happiness. Therefore, leisure policy could be made to more effectively enhance the happiness of parents, especially when infrastructure, such as leisure facilities, programs, and professionals, is provided in tandem. It is believed that appropriate interventions for enhancing attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy would help Korean caregivers perceive positive benefits from leisure activities and improve their assessments of their own happiness.
This study’s importance derives from the fact that it was the first to examine the relationships between attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, satisfaction with leisure activities, and level of happiness in Korean caregivers for young children. However, the study had some limitations. First, it focused on Korean caregivers for young children, but did not explore the multiple demographic factors might exist that influence their satisfaction with leisure activities, such as age, educational background, income, employment, etc. It might be interesting to investigate the factors that influence satisfaction with leisure activities among parent caregivers. The second limitation is related to the nature of the methodology used in this study. This cross-sectional study was designed to examine the psychological benefits gained by having a more positive attitude toward leisure and feeling greater satisfaction with leisure policy via satisfaction with leisure activities in Korean caregivers for young children. It would be beneficial for future research to qualitatively investigate the relationship between leisure experience and level of happiness among Korean caregivers for young children. Finally, this study did not differentiate between the types of Korean family structures that contain caregivers. There might be a difference in leisure activity tendencies among married parents, single parents, grandparents, etc. Future studies should investigate the relationships among the types of family structures, leisure, and happiness.
This study aimed to explore the structural relationships among attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, satisfaction with leisure activities, and level of happiness in Korean caregivers for young children. Its results show that Korean caregivers’ attitudes toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy are important to their levels of happiness; satisfaction with leisure activities mediated the link between attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and level of happiness, suggesting no gender difference. This study has advanced the literature on leisure by suggesting that satisfaction with leisure activities can promote happiness in Korean caregivers who are raising young children. The findings suggest that attitude toward leisure and satisfaction with leisure policy provide an avenue for improving satisfaction with leisure activities and facilitating happiness.
Data are available upon request from the corresponding author. Data from this study originated from the National Leisure Activities Survey of Korea 2018.
Han, J., Jung, D. & Lee, J. An empirical study on satisfaction of public leisure facilities and leisure life: Mediating effect of leisure policy satisfaction. J. Leis. Stud. 17(2), 61–85 (2019).
Doh, Y. Y. & Chung, J. B. What types of happiness do Korean adults pursue? Comparison of seven happiness types. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(5), 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051502 (2020).
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R. & Sachs, J. D. World Happiness Report 2019 (Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2019).
The World Bank. World Bank GDP Per Capita (Current US$) https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD (2021).
Mutz, M., Reimers, A. K. & Demetriou, Y. Leisure time sports activities and life satisfaction: Deeper insights based on a representative survey from Germany. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 16, 2155–2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09866-7 (2021).
Riddick, C. C. Leisure satisfaction precursors. J. Leis. Res. 18, 259–265 (1986).
Orthner, D. K. & Mancini, J. A. Leisure impacts on family interaction and cohesion. J. Leis. Res. 22, 123–137 (1990).
Agate, J. R., Zabriskie, R. B., Agate, S. T. & Poff, R. Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. J. Leis. Res. 41(2), 205–223 (2009).
Zabriskie, R. B. & McCormick, B. Parent and child perspectives of family leisure involvement and satisfaction with family life. J. Leis. Res. 35, 163–189 (2003).
Jeong, K. & Won, C. Relationship of lifestyle, leisure, recognition and leisure satisfaction. Int. J. Tour. Manage. Sci. 17(2), 23–41 (2002).
Kim, K. & Lee, R. Leisure activities, leisure satisfaction and happiness among the Korean: utilizing data of national statistics. J. Korea Contents Asso. 11(11), 424–433 (2011).
Tebb, S. An aid to empowerment. Health So. Work 20(1), 87–92 (1995).
Bedini, L. A. & Phoenix, T. L. Perceptions of leisure by family caregivers: A profile. Ther. Recreat. J. 38(4), 366–381 (2004).
Yoo, J. & Kim, H. Effects of caregivers’ participation in family leisure activities on parenting stress and family health during the COVID-19. J Yeolin Educ. 29(5), 219–237 (2021).
Lee, J.-H. Relationship between the quality of life by the leisure activity of high school students. Korea Sport Res. 16(5), 1483–1490 (2005).
Lee, R.-J. The study on the relations in between the leisure activity, leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction of college student. J. Tour. Stud. 22(2), 155–178 (2010).
Son, J.-Y. A effect of leisure participating older adults leisure satisfaction as a leisure participant on psychological wellbeing. J. Korea Contents Asso. 17(9), 536–548 (2017).
Veblen, T. The Theory of the Leisure Class (Dover Publications, 1994).
Edginton, C. R. & Chen, P. Leisure as Transformation (Sagamore Publishing, 2008).
Leitner, M. J. & Leitner, S. F. Leisure Enhancement (Haworth Press, 2004).
Stebbins, R. Serious leisure and work. Soc. Compass 3(5), 764–774 (2009).
Meyer, B. & Niezgoda, A. The impact of the perception of leisure on recreational and tourism spaces in an urban area. Tourism 28(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/tour-2018-0006 (2018).
Ragheb, M. G. & Beard, J. G. Measuring leisure attitude. J. Leis. Res. 14, 155–167 (1982).
Teixeira, A. & Freire, T. The leisure attitude scale: Psychometrics properties of a short version for adolescents and young adults. Leisure/Loisir 37(1), 57–66 (2013).
Choi, J.-H. New paradigm of leisure concept. J. Sport Leis. Stud. 13, 513–521 (2000).
Jeung, Y.-K. & Yoon, S.-Y. Impact of leisure activity on the leisure economy of Korean baby-boomers. Korea Fam. Resour. Manage. Asso. 18(3), 61–77 (2014).
Ragheb, M. G. & Tate, R. L. A behavioural model of leisure participation, based on leisure attitude, motivation and satisfaction. Leis. Stud. 12(1), 61–70 (1993).
Haworth, J. & Lewis, S. Work, leisure and well-being. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 33(1), 67–79 (2005).
Kim, S., Sung, J., Park, J. & Dittmore, S. W. The relationship among leisure attitude, satisfaction, and psychological well-being for college students. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 15(1), 70 (2015).
Kim, S.-H. Relation between adolescents’ level of involvement in recreational activities and emotional expression and confidence for recreation. J. Leis. Rec. Stud. 33(2), 135–144 (2009).
Choi, S. & Yoo, Y. Leisure attitude and satisfaction with leisure and life: proposing leisure prioritization and justification. World Leis. J. 59, 140–155 (2017).
Cho, M.-K. An empirical study on the factors of leisure activity for the effectiveness of leisure policy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) (University of Seoul, 2015).
Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism. 2016 Survey on National Leisure Activity https://www.mcst.go.kr/kor/s_policy/dept/deptView.jsp?pSeq=1662&pDataCD=0406000000&pType= (2016).
Sul, M.-S. The government’s efficient organization for the leisure policy revamp. Korea J. Sports Sci. 23(2), 401–411 (2013).
Oh, H.-G. & Park, S. M. Exploring the effects of work life balance policies on job and life satisfaction: with a focus on a moderating role of organizational commitment in public and private organizations. Korean Public Adm. Q. 26(4), 901–930 (2014).
Heo, C. U. Satisfaction and constraints on leisure activities participation among the leisure facilities user in Korea. Int. J. Tour. Hosp. Res. 28(12), 203–213 (2014).
Beard, J. G. & Ragheb, M. G. Measuring leisure satisfaction. J. Leis. Res. 12(1), 20–33 (1980).
Ateca-Amestoy, V. Leisure and subjective well-being in Handbook on the economics of leisure (ed. Cameron, S.) 52–76 (Edward Elgar, 2011).
McMahon, D. M. Happiness: A history (Grove, UK, 2006).
Myers, D. G. & Diener, E. Who is happy ?. Psychol Sci 6(1), 10–19 (1995).
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction in Handbook of positive psychology (eds. Snyder, C. R. & Lopez, S. J.) 463–473 (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Seligman, M. E. P. Authentic Happiness (Free Press, 2002).
Cho, D. Analytical concept of happiness and its measurement. J. Labour Econ. 40(3), 79–104 (2017).
Freire, T. & Teixeira, A. The influence of leisure attitudes and leisure satisfaction on adolescents’ positive functioning: The role of emotion regulation. Front. Psychol. 9(1349), 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01349 (2018).
Kaya, S. The relationship between leisure satisfaction and happiness among college students. Univers. J. Educ. Res. 4(3), 622–631 (2016).
Shin, K. & You, S. Leisure type, leisure satisfaction and adolescents’ psychological wellbeing. J. Pac. Rim Psychol. 7, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2013.6 (2013).
Wang, E., Chen, L., Lin, J. & Wang, M. C. The relationship between leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction of adolescents concerning online games. Adolescence 43, 177–184 (2008).
Doh, N. Sufficient leisure time must be guaranteed for the happiness of infants and toddlers. KICCE Policy Brief 24, 1–4 (2014).
Moon, H. A study of parental satisfaction and child-rearing practices. J. Korean Home Econ. Asso. 39(1), 205–219 (2001).
Kim, K. The effect of parent`s happiness and parenting stress on parenting attitude. Korean J. Child Care Educ. 116, 1–20 (2019).
Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. What can economists learn from happiness research?. J. Econ. Lit. 40(2), 402–435 (2002).
Jung, H., Kwon, J., Jeong, S., Kim, S., Chun,Y., Kwon, S., & Yu, J. A comprehensive study of happiness and quality of life in Korea (KIHASA, 2019).
Kim, M. S., Kim, H. W., Han, Y. S. & Im, J. Y. Explorations on the happy life of Koreans on the bases of their social structural variables. Korean J. Psychol. General 22(2), 1–33 (2003).
Hong, S. H., Malik, M. L. & Lee, M. K. Testing configural, metric, scalar and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-western sample. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 63(4), 636–654 (2003).
Kim, J., Kim, M. & Hong, S. Structural Equation Modeling in Dissertation (Communication Books, 2009).
Byrne, B. M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Application and Programming (Routledge, 2010).
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 (1981).
Hari, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. Multivariate Data Analysis 7th edn. (Prentice-Hall, 2010).
Hu, L. Z. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Modeling: A Multidiscip. J. 6, 1–55 (1999).
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis of the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge, 2013).
Ahn, H.-K. & Lee, M.-K. Relationships between social support and psychological well-being according to leisure attitudes of middle and high school student. J. Korean Soc. Wellness 12(3), 185–198 (2017).
Min, K. Leisure and life satisfaction among the work-life balance generation. J. Korean Soc. Wellness 13(3), 377–388 (2018).
Ahn, B. W. The verification of relationship model among leisure motivation, flow, constraint, attitude, satisfaction by foreigners’ leisure activity participation in Korea. J. Wellness 9(4), 13–25 (2014).
Mattingly, M. J. & Bianchi, M. Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Soc. Forces 81, 1030–999 (2003).
Qian, Y. & Sayer, L. C. Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction: A comparative analysis of mainland China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. J. Marriage Fam. 78(2), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12274 (2016).
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author declares no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yoo, J. Attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and happiness are mediated by satisfaction with leisure activities. Sci Rep 12, 11723 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16012-w