Abstract
Several studies investigated the dynamics of coastal areas, investigating some issues such as sea-level rise, floods, and water scarcity. Despite existing studies discussing coastal areas, there are limited studies investigating Asian coastal areas and their proposed solutions may not overcome extreme events. This study investigates the dynamics of the Pekalongan coastal area, Central Java, Indonesia. Despite efforts such as the development of dikes and groundwater pumping, people in Pekalongan have currently experienced more frequent floods and land subsidence that have led to larger inundated areas and people migration. Using the system archetypes, this study shows that the coastal area consists of renowned nexus elements (water, land, and food) and less recognized nexus elements (health and wellbeing). This means that changes in one nexus element may threaten other nexus elements, exacerbating problems in the observed system. For instance, unsustainable nexus actions such as overexploited groundwater tend to increase flooded areas, threatening people health, and inducing people migration. The system archetypes also show that the coastal area consists of Limits to Growth structures. As such, growth engines such as land-use change and groundwater pumping should be managed or restricted properly. Managing growth engines can prevent us from natural disasters such as floods and water scarcity. Likewise, as the system archetypes describe generic patterns and solutions, some findings of this study can be useful for the other coastal areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
It is estimated that at least 250 million people live near the Asian low-elevation coastal zone (LECZ)1. Since, the LECZ is associated with tidal floods, flash floods, and land-use change, people who live in LECZ have already experienced negative impacts of natural hazards. As a large fraction of Asians lives in LECZ, Asian coastal cities have faced difficulties in providing comfortable living spaces for their inhabitants. It is due to population growth, economic activities, and climate change. Owing to their important roles in humankind’s daily life, urban areas, especially, coastal urban areas, expand more and more to support our life. As more employment and economic activities exist in the coastal areas, more people move towards the coastal areas2. More economic activities owing to urbanization lead to higher material consumption. As resources such as water and land are not abundant, coastal cities around the world have faced difficulties in providing a comfortable life for their inhabitants. This means that understanding the dynamics of LECZ is important as it enables us to balance resource supply and human consumption, leading to sustainable development.
Frequent natural hazards in coastal areas such as droughts, tidal floods, and flash floods have attracted some scholars to investigate the dynamics of coastal areas. Existing studies analyzed droughts or water scarcities3,4, sea-level rise5,6, and floods in Asian coastal cities2,7. In general, those studies proposed some solutions such as reused water8,9 and dikes or water tunnels for coping with tidal floods or flash floods7,10. However, many of the proposed solutions may not minimize natural disasters properly as seen in Pekalongan11 and Jakarta7. Besides, proposed solutions, especially dikes, are very expensive. So, development dikes are not widely applied in Asia.
Several studies12,13,14,15,16 pointed out that there are interlinked elements in coastal cities such as water, land, climate, and food. Unfortunately, existing studies that have investigated the nexus in Asian coastal cities are very limited16. In Indonesia, for example, most nexus studies were about the nexus in the Jatiluhur reservoir17,18,19. Besides, there are limited studies that have discussed important issues such as health and people migration. The latter is important as existing studies20,21,22 are concerned on the impacts of environmental changes and climate on health, wellbeing, and migration. Hence, this study aims to develop more sophisticated nexus connections in increasing the society awareness of the nexus dependence in the Indonesian coastal area. In other words, this study incorporates health, people migration, and other renowned nexus elements (water, energy, food, and land).
Among the Asian countries, Indonesia has the longest coastline23. Likewise, it is about 60% of the total Indonesians live in coastal areas. Besides, Indonesia has a coastline of about 81,000 km24,25,26, 14% of the world’s coastline25. Owing to these, this study is very important for Indonesia. The locus of this study is Pekalongan, an Indonesian coastal city, which is famous because of its Batik industry. As a rising coastal urban area, Pekalongan has experienced multiple unexpected incidences such as the variations in the groundwater table, insufficient water supply, and tidal floods.
Likewise, conducting research in the local coastal area is encouraged as existing studies20,21,27 confirm that the city governments such as the local government of Pekalongan have the responsibility to provide the healthy built environment and wellbeing for society. Hence, this study reinforces the responsibility of local (city) government to provide the healthy environment for local people.
This study starts with the first paragraphs, introducing some existing studies and their findings. Next, the research gap is described and results are described respectively. In the following sections, this study explains the implications of findings for other coastal areas before describing concluding remarks.
Materials and methods
Study area
Pekalongan is located in Central Java, Indonesia (Fig. 1). Specifically, Pekalongan is located between Semarang, the capital city of Central Java, and Cirebon, the main hub between Jakarta and surrounding areas. This city is famous because of its Batik, an Indonesian traditional dress, and the Indonesian national costume. Owing to its popularity, Batik has been transformed into different modern product variations and it is categorized as one of the UNESCO heritages28. Due to its high Batik quality, Pekalongan is awarded as the World Batik city29.
Pekalongan, Central Java, Indonesia31. The shaded area is Pekalongan and red lines show inundated areas after tidal floods.
Geographically, Pekalongan is between 6 50′ 42″–6 55′ 44″ South Latitude and 109 37′ 55″–109 42′ 19″ East Longitude30. Its elevation is about 1 m above sea level and its area is about 4525 ha, dominated by urban housing and farming areas30. Most livelihoods are fishermen and farmers as its land is close to the Java sea and the second most land is farming areas30.
Pekalongan’s population is about 1,200,000 people and its population has increased by about 2% a year30. In the last 4 years (2016–2019), Pekalongan’s economic growth has been about 3% year. Due to its heritage value and its economic importance, the government has constructed the Batik museum to conserve Batik products (as seen in Fig. 2). All of these efforts have put Pekalongan as the largest creative industry in Java32.
Batik collections in the Batik Museum Pekalongan33.
The system archetypes
The system dynamics (SD) approach has been applied in several different fields such as agriculture34, and public health35. The SD approach relies on understanding the system structure. Once people can capture the system structures, they can explain and predict the system behavior, the system performance, and the system failures. As consequence, after understanding the system structure, scientists can propose solutions to overcome bottlenecks in the observed systems36.
The system dynamics also concern interdependency and the complexity of studied sectors. The interdependency and complexity are corresponding with dynamic feedback within studied sectors. Through dynamic feedback, the effects of one sector to other sectors and vice versa are examined and quantified37. Investigating the dynamic feedback and uncertainty leads to minimizing possible unintended consequences. Preventing unintended consequences is important as existing studies explain that proposed solutions lead to possible unintended consequences such as the fish outbreaks17.
The SD approach has two different tools: the system dynamics models and the system archetypes. While the SD models can quantitatively explain the system structure and behavior, the system archetypes explain the observed system qualitatively. In this study, the system archetype is applied for three main reasons. The first reason is the system archetypes are the universal patterns that exist in different kinds of the observed systems. The second reason is the system archetypes enable us to find bottlenecks and generic solutions to increase and sustain the system performance. The third reason is the coastal areas are the complex system38 and the system archetypes are a suitable tool for capturing connections, dependence, and feedbacks in the complex systems34.
Likewise, the system archetypes, a qualitative tool of the system dynamics, have been applied in varied nexus studies such as the Jatiluhur reservoir17; the European organic food39; and the natural resource management40. This means that the system archetypes are the applicable and reliable tool for nexus studies. Some useful strong points of the system archetypes are that system archetypes do not need abundant data and complex mathematical relationships. Narratives, for example, can be used to compose the system archetypes structures. Although system archetypes can be composed of narratives, system archetypes can provide insights into observed studies, so we can predict possible problems and define possible solutions41.
To date, there are a lot of identified system archetypes structures such as The Limits to Growth, Shifting the Burden, Eroding Goals, and Escalation. A generic structure of the system archetypes consists of a combination of two or more feedback loops including balancing and reinforcing loops. A feedback loop is a combination of two or causal links between elements that are connected in such a way, one eventually returns to the first element. For example, if a change in variable A directly causes a change in variable B which directly causes a change in variable C, which in turn directly causes a change of our initial variable A, then we are dealing with a feedback loop (see Fig. 3a).
A causal link and feedback loops (a), and the Limits to Growth archetype (b).
To identify the system archetypes, there are three consecutive steps. We collect relevant literature review and in the second step, we compose narratives based on existing studies. Based on narratives, data, and literature review, we describe identified system archetypes and explain generic solutions for identified system archetypes42.
Among identified system archetypes, perhaps, the Limits to Growth structure is the most frequently identified structure. As seen in Fig. 3b, a combination of a reinforcing loop (R) and a balancing loop (B) is called The Limits to Growth42,43.
Figure 3b reproduces a usual dynamic pattern found in the urban areas. A reinforcing loop (R = land-use change–tourism facilities–population) tells us that population leads to more land-use change. And land-use change leads to more tourism facilities such as hotels and restaurants. The growth of urban areas is bounded by a limiting factor, water supply. A balancing loop (B = population–water demand–water supply) tells us that water as a limiting factor cannot support the growth of urban areas as water demand will deplete water supply, leading to restricted land-use change. This case is found, for instance, in Benidorm, Spain44.
Research approach
The coastal system is complex as it consists of sophisticated interactions between human beings and natural disasters. Natural disasters are, for instance, tidal floods, storm surges, and sea-level rise. Natural disasters may threaten assets or capital in coastal areas.
Since the coastal area consists of complex interactions, a combination of data and a literature review was collected during this study. Based on collected data, we can identify system archetypes, proposing some generic solutions42. In case data is insufficient, narratives and/or storylines can be summarized to generate meaningful system archetypes34,43.
To convert collected data and narratives into the system archetypes, this study conducts four levels of system thinking steps41 as seen in Fig. 4. Those four levels are events, patterns, systemic structures, and mental models. Each level is explained in the following paragraphs.
Four levels of system thinking41.
At the event level, key issues of the observed systems are described. Besides, decision-makers usually focus on observed events and then make decisions on a series of observed events. As observed events may camouflage causalities of observed systems, decisions based on observed events may solve symptoms but they usually do not solve real problems41.
There are about 1100 Batik companies in Pekalongan and about 81% of them are small to medium Batik enterprises32. Of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Pekalongan’s manufacturing sector contributed to about 23% of Pekalongan’s GDP45. It is estimated that about 70% of the manufacturing sector is supported by the Batik industry46. The Batik industry also contributed to about 50–80% of the total employment in Pekalongan46. The increasing roles of the Batik industry have led to an increasing water demand30.
At this level, decision-makers took a critical decision based on an important event, an increasing water demand. That is, allowing the Batik companies to extract groundwater. Extracting groundwater is not a real solution to an increasing water demand as an excessive groundwater extraction led to land subsidence and frequent tidal floods47,48.
In the second level, the real-world patterns can be collected through behavior over time graphs43. In general, behavior over time (BOT) graphs show how observed systems act or change over time. As the second level is based on data, it tends to provide more meaningful information.
Figure 5 illustrates the BOT graph of some key variables in the Pekalongan coastal area over recent years. The main aim of the BOT graph is to provide readers information about directions of the key variables in the observed systems41. Owing to this, the vertical axis and horizontal axis of the BOT graph show performance measures of interest and time consecutively41. Thus, the BOT graph is drawn in a rough sense without exact values attached41.
BOT graph of key variables in Pekalongan.
Although the BOT graph or Fig. 5 does not display exact values, the dynamics of key variables are well verified by relevant supporting evidence. For instance, the Pekalongan coastal area has experienced a gradual increase in its Batik export from 3 billion Indonesian Rupiahs in 2000s to 17 billion Indonesian Rupiahs (IDR) in 202030,49,50. However, at the same time, Pekalongan has experienced environmental degradation47,51,52. For instance, due to overexploited groundwater, Pekalongan has experienced an increasing land subsidence about 7.7–10.5 cm/year53 in 2009 to about 10–14 cm/year54 in 2015, leading to larger submerged areas over time.
Owing to land subsidence, in the early 2000s, it was estimated that about 9% of the total Pekalongan area was submerged after floods and by 2020, about 29% of the Pekalongan coastal area was submerged55,56,57,58, leading to larger damaged roads and houses59,60. Next, land subsidence has also led to more frequent floods in Pekalongan, from 0–1 floods/year to 2–5 floods/year61. This means that a prosperous Batik export is negated by environmental degradation46.
In the third level, the systemic structure, connected multiple actors interact and affect each other. Existing causalities and interactions between multiple actors can be summarized in a causal loop diagram37,41. A simplified causal loop diagram (Fig. 16) will be explained after identified system archetypes are explained.
Through the mental models, the fourth level, we can analyze observed systems and correct our mental models that are based on our beliefs, values, and assumptions41. Next, based on narratives and collected data, it is found that integrated planning is required to achieve sustainable development in Pekalongan. It also found that man-made acts such as groundwater exploration and land-use change lead to environmental degradation. Thus, this study proposed the nexus approach in analyzing the dynamics of the coastal area in Pekalongan, Indonesia. The nexus approach is further explained in the section “The nexus between water, energy, food, and land (plus health)”.
The nexus between water, energy, food, and land (plus health)
One promising approach of the integrated natural resource management is nexus. In general, nexus considers that connected elements are dependent on each other. This means that it is not possible to discuss one element since each element is dynamically dependent on other elements62. In Pekalongan, once water or groundwater is explored excessively, people have experienced land subsidence47. Another example is more land-use change leads to climate change that causes a sea-level rise or inundated areas47. This means that nexus enables us to see connections between water (groundwater), land (land subsidence and inundated areas), and climate change. It is thus this study that applies the nexus concept to analyze interactions among multiple actors in Pekalongan. The system archetypes are applied to visually identify interactions and obtain generic solutions to critical issues in Pekalongan, Central Java, Indonesia.
The role of the system dynamics approach in the nexus approach can be detected in the 1970s after a monumental publication of The Limits to Growth63. Another study63 reminded us of possible imbalances between the world population and food production owing to resource depletion and industrialization. That study also encouraged us to support sustainability in water, food, and energy for humankind’s existence62. In short, the nexus approach is in line with the application of the system dynamics application in the nexus studies.
Moreover, there is an increasing interest among academia in the nexus between water, energy, food, and land62,64,65,66. This growing interest is due to important premises. The first premise is the nexus context requires analyzing different elements of nexus simultaneously as each nexus element dependents the each other. The third premise is an imbalance between resource availability and high resource consumption requires the nexus management to manage resource demand and resource supply.
The nexus means a connection of a couple of elements that interact and affect each other. As each element affects other element(s), discussing one nexus element will lead to unsustainable other nexus elements. This may lead the community to resource scarcity. For instance, in the nexus between water, food, land, and energy, researchers who focused only on fish production can sacrifice energy supply and/or water quality17. It is thus when people discuss nexus studies, people must consider the importance of the connections between nexus elements and how a nexus element determines other nexus elements and vice versa.
A possible nexus connection based on the system archetype approach can be seen in Fig. 6. This figure is a simplified summary of the nexus between water, energy, and land in the Marina Baixa44. Water supports the population in low and high-density areas, while water extraction increases energy consumption in the Marina Baixa. The Marina Baixa is a drought area in Alicante, Spain that has experienced droughts in the last decades. Droughts have happened as Benidorm (one municipality in the Marina Baixa) has attracted a million tourists every year, leading to high water demand in this drought area. Once people focused on surface water and groundwater, there is increasing energy consumption. Moreover, as people convert land to build hotels and residential areas (land-use change increases due to urbanization and tourism), water supply increases (droughts occur). This means when we only focus on one nexus element (either water or land), we may sacrifice other resource availability. This example should be recognized as the previously mentioned premise that nexus elements must be determined simultaneously. Otherwise, we will sacrifice or decrease other resource availability once we focus only on one resource or one nexus element.
A simplified node of nexus elements in the Marina Baixa County44.
The nexus study as seen in Fig. 6 shows that the system archetype approach can be applied to investigate the nexus studies. Moreover, this study takes one step ahead to include health, and wellbeing in the nexus studies. In other words, as climate change and environmental changes may threaten our health and wellbeing21, this study combines the renowned nexus elements (water, land, and food) with health and wellbeing.
Results and discussion
Land-use change, consumption, and climate change
Pekalongan has relied on agricultural areas and the flourishing Batik industry. Owing to industrial development and housing development, Pekalongan has experienced land-use change. Land-use change has happened as people migrate to Pekalongan city to support industrial development, especially Batik industries.
There are about 2000 Batik companies in Pekalongan and about 81% of them are small to medium Batik enterprises32. As small and medium enterprises are labor-intensive industries, the Batik industries contribute to about 50–65% of the total employment in Pekalongan46. Batik industries have increased accumulated capital such as factories, and machinery. Total capital in the Batik industry has increased from IDR 72 billion67 in 2000s to IDR 450 billion in 202030.
Interactions between capital, economy, and land-use change in Pekalongan and its surrounding areas can be represented in the Limits to Growth structure (Fig. 7). The growth engine of this interaction is economic growth supported by two reinforcing loops: R1 (economic growth–urbanization–labor) and R2 (economic growth–urbanization–land-use change–labor). In this case, land-use change and urbanization can increase capital and workers. It is acknowledged that capital and labour are two important factors of the economic development68.
The Limits to Growth #1 (A notation of “#1” is used for numbering the Limits to Growth).
Urbanization, on the one hand, leads to more material and energy consumption which induces climate change through increasing greenhouse gases after material and energy consumption69,70. Increasing material and energy consumption after urbanization is also noted by the local statistics bureau of Pekalongan30. Two balancing loops, B1 and B2, prove that climate change may threaten economic growth as B1 and B2 induce climate change through higher material consumption (economic growth–urbanization–material consumption–climate change–sea-level rise–tidal floods–capital) and land-use change (economic growth–urbanization–land-use change–climate change–sea-level rise–tidal floods–capital). Figure 7 also shows that tidal floods owing to sea-level rise associated with climate change can damage capitals47,71 such as offices, and houses alongside the Pekalongan coastline as seen in Fig. 8a.
Possible solutions to escape from this situation are restricting urbanization or land-use change as it induces higher material consumption and land-use change, two causes of climate change.
To minimize tidal floods, the government has built a dike (Fig. 8b). This also can be drawn in Fig. 9 as a reinforcing loop (R3 = economic growth–urbanization–material consumption–climate change–sea-level rise–dikes–tidal floods–capital)51,74. This reinforcing loop (R3) means that massive urbanization or land-use change leads to sea-level rise and tidal floods. Without managing or hindering land-use change, tidal floods may not be controlled properly.
The Limits to Growth #2.
Water and food
Land-use change has two possible effects: more runoff75 and rising water demand69,76. Land-use change, in general, diminishes public green areas or forests that function as a source of infiltrated water. Less infiltrated water means more runoff, threatening the water supply. Furthermore, land-use change can increase water demand, leading to water deficits.
In Pekalongan, the government allowed people and companies such as Batik factories to discharge local aquifers owing to rising water demand. Please note that groundwater discharges need a water pump (located close to resident housing) while commercial water companies apply some capital such as water pumping stations, long pipelines, and water pumps. In other words, discharged groundwater is cheaper than commercial water. Thus, it is not surprising that most people consume groundwater than water from commercial companies.
Dynamic relationships between land-use change, water demand, and groundwater lead to the Limits to Growth structure (R4–B3) as seen in Fig. 10. The Limits to Growth structure (R4–B3) reminds us to control land-use change, sustaining green spaces that absorb rainfall to increase water supply and minimize runoff.
The Limits to Growth #3.
Owing to massive groundwater exploitation, Pekalongan has experienced land subsidence47. The land subsidence leads to decreasing surface land, leading to more incoming seawater due to sea-level rise. Several studies47,77 stated that the height of incoming seawater was about 50–100 cm or higher and it has inundated a large part of Pekalongan and its surrounding areas in the last decade47,77. Moreover, existing studies47,77 reported that tidal floods may last several hours60, damaging housing, public facilities, and business properties. It was estimated that the economic loss due to tidal floods is projected at about IDR 7 trillion (about USD 50 billion)71. The local governments also reported an increase in the number of affected people after floods from 55 people in 2010s to over 100,000 people in 202061. The number of affected people has increased owing to increasing affected areas from 9 to 29% of the total Pekalongan areas55,56,57,58.
As seen in Fig. 11, two reinforcing loops (R4–R5) and one balancing loop (B4) are encapsulated as the limits to growth structure. Groundwater has many functions such as blocking seawater intrusion and impeding land subsidence. Once people excessively exploit groundwater (R4), people are likely to experience seawater intrusion as R5 (groundwater exploitation–seawater intrusion–water deficits). Owing to land subsidence and despite the development of dikes, people in Pekalongan have still experienced tidal floods (Fig. 12).
The Limits to Growth #4.
Inundated areas after the dike construction78.
Figures 13 and 14 show other Limits to Growth structures. While Fig. 9 shows that tidal floods may damage capital, Figs. 13 and 14 show that tidal floods cause outmigration (B5) and less food production (B6) respectively. As people need a comfortable life, inundated houses and inundated properties after tidal floods induce outmigration1, 79. Moreover, due to people relocation, coastal areas experience labor shortages, threatening economic activities as seen in B5.
The Limits to Growth #5.
The Limits to Growth #6.
Tidal floods may increase soil salinity, leading to infertile farming land and decreasing agricultural production47,71. As farming areas decrease, food availability declines (B6). This means that exploited groundwater and sea-level rise associated with climate change threatens interlinked nexus elements including land (farming areas), water (groundwater), food (farming areas), and economy (damaged capital and lack of labor).
Health and wellbeing
Tidal floods in Pekalongan have threatened society health11,59 and wellbeing80. As previously mentioned, owing to inundated areas, some green and public spaces in Pekalongan are gradually decreased. Tidal floods also tend to threaten people’s health as tidal floods induce bacteria that lead to dermatitis or other skin diseases, and respiratory tract infections11,59. Another impact of the tidal floods is structural adaptations such as raising ground floor71, leading to limited living spaces. Limited public spaces and limited living spaces can decrease society’s well-being80. Figure 15 shows a simplified connection between tidal floods, health, and wellbeing.
The Limits to Growth #7.
Two balancing loops (B7 = economic growth–urbanization–material consumption–climate change–sea-level rise–tidal floods–skin disease–wellbeing–labor productivity) and (B8 = economic growth–urbanization–material consumption–climate change–sea-level rise–tidal floods–raising ground floors–wellbeing–labor productivity) show that less wellbeing and less healthy leads to less labor productivity81. As seen in Fig. 15, tidal floods increase the number of people with given diseases, showing an additional nexus element, health. Likewise, tidal floods cause people to raise their ground floors so their houses are not flooded, lessening society’s wellbeing. Hence, tidal floods through wellbeing and health may influence economic growth through labor productivity.
A simplified causal loop diagram
The combination of previously mentioned structures can be summarized in Fig. 16 as a simplified causal loop diagram (CLD). The CLD is dominated by the Limits to Growth structures. There are 6 structures of The Limits to Growth in total (the last of the Limits to Growth is explained in the following paragraphs). This means that the development of coastal areas, in general, is hindered by existing barriers such as water availability and sea-level rise. As the Limits to Growth structure may be remedied by removing barriers41. Owing to this, reused water should be one sustainable solution (Fig. 17).
A causal loop diagram.
The Limits to Growth #8.
One possible solution is reused water as seen in Fig. 17. Reused water can increase water availability so people can escape from overexploited groundwater, land subsidence, and abandoned farming land. Figure 17 shows another structure of the limits to growth (R4–B7). This structure inhibits overexploited groundwater associated with land subsidence and seawater intrusion once reused water is produced. Across the world, reused water has been distributed in several places such as Spanish coastal cities4,82, Italian and Greece coastal cities83, and Singapore84.
According to Giampietro et al.62 nexus is associated with dependent elements in the real world. In general, discussing one nexus element is relatively impossible as a nexus element is dynamically dependent on other elements. The CLD shows the dependence between nexus elements.
Growing coastal areas are associated with land-use change (land as a nexus element) and farming areas (food as a nexus element). Growing coastal areas require more water (a nexus element). This means that there are interlinked elements between water, food, and land. Once land-use change rises, more water is needed to support growing coastal areas (growing population and growing industries). Land-use change may deplete farming land which means that land-use change as a nexus element influences food supply as a nexus element.
The nexus concept also enables us to find sustainable solutions. As explained earlier, after the dike construction, people have still faced difficulties due to tidal floods. The dikes may hamper tidal floods, but excessive groundwater exploitation negates the benefit of the dikes, as the dikes have experienced land subsidence.
Implications for other coastal areas
Table 1 highlights similar problems in Pekalongan and coastal cities around the world. Land-use change, floods (either flash floods or tidal floods), and water scarcities have occurred in other coastal areas. For instance, as Pekalongan, other coastal cities such as Mumbai and Chinese coastal cities (Table 1) have also experienced land use. Several coastal cities have also experienced other natural disasters such as tidal floods and water scarcity (Table 1).
As the system archetypes are universal or generic patterns, identified structures of the system archetypes and proposed solutions described in this study can be founded in other coastal regions. Due to generic solutions of the system archetypes, suggested solutions such as reused water application, controlled groundwater exploitation, and restriction of urbanization/land-use change are universal solutions for other coastal cities.
Conclusion
This study discusses the dynamics of coastal areas, especially LECZ by highlighting interlinked nexus elements in the Pekalongan coastal area, Indonesia. The system archetype approach enables us to capture complex connections and links between nexus elements such as water, land, food, and health. This study is probably the first study capturing the connection between health, people migration, and renowned nexus elements such as water and food. This is important as climate change and environmental changes can affect human health and people migration. Furthermore, through identified system archetypes, the dynamics of interlinked elements are explained as well as problems and possible solutions to achieve a sustainable coastal city.
This study also shows us that the Limits to Growth structure is dominant in LECZ as there are nine balancing loops and five reinforcing loops. This means that the growth engines’ so-called reinforcing loops such as economic growth, land-use change, and groundwater exploitation are hampered by water availability and land availability. Once the growth engines are not properly controlled, some natural hazards such as tidal floods and water scarcity may occur.
Although this study only discusses a single LECZ, the Pekalongan coastal areas, this study can be a compass to understand the dynamics of interlinked elements in LECZs. Table 1 shows similar patterns between Pekalongan and other coastal cities across the world. It is thus this study offers useful findings for other LECZs.
This study also proves that the system archetypes are a promising qualitative tool in the nexus arena. The system archetypes, as seen in this study, can provide us insights such as growth engines (reinforcing loops) and tradeoffs (the Limits to Growth structures) found in the nexus studies. In turn, this study complements existing studies16 that use quantitative approaches in nexus studies. In addition, because developing countries such as Indonesia usually have limited research data and limited research funding, the system archetypes are a suitable tool in investigating the nexus elements.
Following this study, the next avenue is to use and expand the free SD tool from another study94 to quantitatively assess the nexus of water, land, and food under a changing climate in coastal cities. It is hoped that the next avenue will be investigating the impacts of climate change and water scarcity in critical LECZ such as the Pekalongan coastal area.
References
Hauer, M. E. et al. Sea-level rise and human migration. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 28–39 (2020).
Duy, P., Chapman, L., Tight, M., Thuong, L. & Linh, P. Urban resilience to floods in coastal cities: Challenges and opportunities for Ho Chi Minh city and other emerging cities in southeast Asia. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 144, 05017018 (2018).
Magno, R. et al. Semi-automatic operational service for drought monitoring and forecasting in the Tuscany region. Geosciences 8, 49 (2018).
Rico, A., Olcina, J., Baños, C., Garcia, X. & Sauri, D. Declining water consumption in the hotel industry of mass tourism resorts: Contrasting evidence for Benidorm, Spain. Curr. Issues Tour. 23, 770–783 (2020).
Hasnat, G. T., Kabir, M. A. & Hossain, M. A. Major environmental issues and problems of South Asia, particularly Bangladesh. Handb. Environ. Mater. Manag., 1–40 (2018).
Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J. & Nicholls, R. J. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—A global assessment. PLoS One 10, e0118571 (2015).
Cao, A. et al. Future of Asian Deltaic Megacities under sea level rise and land subsidence: Current adaptation pathways for Tokyo, Jakarta, Manila, and Ho Chi Minh City. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 50, 87–97 (2021).
Rahmasary, A. N. et al. Overcoming the challenges of water, waste and climate change in Asian cities. Environ. Manag. 63, 520–535 (2019).
Smol, M., Adam, C. & Preisner, M. Circular economy model framework in the European water and wastewater sector. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 22, 682–697 (2020).
Islam, M. F., Bhattacharya, B. & Popescu, I. Flood risk assessment due to cyclone-induced dike breaching in coastal areas of Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 353–368 (2019).
Salim, M. A. & Siswanto, A. B. Kajian Penanganan Dampak Banjir Kabupaten Pekalongan. Rang Tek. J. 4, 295–303 (2021).
Endo, A. et al. Describing and visualizing a water–energy–food nexus system. Water 10, 1245 (2018).
Gurdak, J. J., Geyer, G. E., Nanus, L., Taniguchi, M. & Corona, C. R. Scale dependence of controls on groundwater vulnerability in the water–energy–food nexus, California Coastal Basin aquifer system. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 11, 126–138 (2017).
Lu, J., Lin, Y., Wu, J. & Zhang, C. Continental-scale spatial distribution, sources, and health risks of heavy metals in seafood: Challenge for the water-food-energy nexus sustainability in coastal regions?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 63815–63828 (2021).
Miller-Robbie, L., Ramaswami, A. & Amerasinghe, P. Wastewater treatment and reuse in urban agriculture: Exploring the food, energy, water, and health nexus in Hyderabad, India. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 075005 (2017).
Taniguchi, M., Endo, A., Gurdak, J. J. & Swarzenski, P. Water-energy-food nexus in the Asia-Pacific region. J. Hydrol. 11, 1–8 (2017).
Bahri, M. Analysis of the water, energy, food and land nexus using the system archetypes: A case study in the Jatiluhur reservoir, West Java, Indonesia. Sci. Total Environ. 716, 137025 (2020).
Lubis, R., Delinom, R., Martosuparno, S. & Bakti, H. Water-Food Nexus in Citarum Watershed, Indonesia Vol. 118, 012023 (IOP Publishing, 2018).
Pawitan, H., Delinom, R. & Taniguchi, M. The human–environment sustainability in Indonesia: The case of the Citarum basin Vol. 23 (UNESCO-IHP, 2015).
Carmichael, L. et al. Urban planning as an enabler of urban health: Challenges and good practice in England following the 2012 planning and public health reforms. Land Use Policy 84, 154–162 (2019).
World Health Organization. Addressing the Social Determinants of Health: The Urban Dimension and the Role of Local Government (World Health Organization, 2012).
Trencher, G. & Karvonen, A. Stretching, “smart”: Advancing health and well-being through the smart city agenda. Local Environ. 24, 610–627 (2019).
Yang, L. et al. Can an island economy be more sustainable? A comparative study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. J. Clean. Prod. 242, 118572 (2020).
Choirunisa, A. K. & Giyarsih, S. R. Kajian Kerentanan Fisik, Sosial, dan Ekonomi Pesisir Samas Kabupaten Bantul Terhadap Erosi Pantai. J. Bumi Indones. 5 (2016).
Gumay, A. Validity and reliability maritime English seafarers proficiency test. INFERENCE J. Engl. Lang. Teach. 3, 64–69 (2021).
Tarigan, M. S. Perubahan garis pantai di wilayah pesisir perairan Cisadane, Provinsi Banten. Makara J. Sci. (2010).
Pruss-Ustun, A., Corvalán, C. F., World Health Organization. Preventing Disease Through Healthy Environments: Towards an Estimate of the Environmental Burden of Disease (World Health Organization, 2006).
Baasanjargal, T., Soon-Joo, A. & Mi-Jeong, K. Comparative analysis of Indonesian Batik traditional patterns: Focused on patterns of Yogyakarta and Pekalongan in Java Island. 한복문화 22, 75–91 (2019).
Rismawati, S. D., Sofiani, T. & Rahmawati, D. R. Legal culture of religious capitalism on Batik business (a case study in Pekalongan Indonesia). JL Pol. Glob. 33, 107 (2015).
Pekalongan, B. K. Kota Pekalongan dalam Angka 2021 (2021).
Google Maps. Pekalongan, Central Java (2022).
Sunarjo, W. A., Ilmiani, A. & Ardianingsih, A. Analisis SWOT Sebagai Pengembangan UMKM Berbasis Ekonomi Kreatif Destinasi Pariwisata Batik Kota Pekalongan. Pena J. Ilmu Pengetah. Dan Teknol. 33, 34–43 (2019).
Perpustakaan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Museum Batik Pekalongan (2017).
Brzezina, N. et al. Development of organic farming in Europe at the crossroads: Looking for the way forward through system archetypes lenses. Sustainability 9, 821 (2017).
Gillies, A. & Maliapen, M. Using healthcare system archetypes to help hospitals become learning organisations. J. Model. Manag. (2008).
Braun, W. The System Archetypes. The Systems Modeling Workbook, 1–26 (2002).
Sterman, J. System Dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (2002).
Islam, M. & Raja, D. R. Waterlogging risk assessment: An undervalued disaster risk in coastal urban community of Chattogram, Bangladesh. Earth 2, 151–173 (2021).
Brzezina, N., Kopainsky, B. & Mathijs, E. Can organic farming reduce vulnerabilities and enhance the resilience of the European food system? A critical assessment using system dynamics structural thinking tools. Sustainability 8, 971 (2016).
Nguyen, N. C. & Bosch, O. J. A systems thinking approach to identify leverage points for sustainability: A case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 30, 104–115 (2013).
Maani, K. E. & Cavana, R. Y. Systems Thinking, System Dynamics: Managing Change and Complexity (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007).
Braun, W. The System Archetypes-the Systems Modeling Workbook. Available Wwwu Uniklu Ac Atgossimitpapsdwbsysarch Pdf (2002).
Senge, P. M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Currency, 2006).
Bahri, M. et al. Deliverable 3.3: Integrated model with ad-hoc systems model of urban water supply (2018).
Pekalongan, B. P. P. D. K. Pekalongan dalam Angka (2021).
Fajar, M., Mediani, A. & Finesa, Y. Analisis Peranan IPAL dalam Strategi Penanganan Limbah Industri Batik di Kota Pekalongan. in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Geografi UMS X 2019 (2019).
Kartika, F. D. S. & Helmi, M. Meta-analysis of Community’s Adaptation Pattern with Tidal Flood in Pekalongan City, Central Java, Indonesia Vol. 125, 09001 (EDP Sciences, 2019).
Kartika, F. D. S., Helmi, M. & Amirudin, A. Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan di Wilayah Pesisir Kota Pekalongan Menggunakan Citra Lansat 8, vol. 1 (2019).
Damayanti, M. & Latifah, L. Strategi Kota Pekalongan dalam pengembangan wisata kreatif berbasis industri batik. J. Pengemb. Kota 3, 100–111 (2017).
Pekalongan, B. K. Kota Pekalongan dalam Angka 2002 (2002).
Andreas, H., Abidin, H. Z., Sarsito, D. A. & Pradipta, D. Adaptation of ‘early climate change disaster’ to the Northern coast of Java Island Indonesia. Eng. J. 22, 207–219 (2018).
Marfai, M. A. et al. The impact of tidal flooding on a coastal community in Semarang, Indonesia. Environmentalist 28, 237–248 (2008).
Chaussard, E., Amelung, F., Abidin, H. & Hong, S.-H. Sinking cities in Indonesia: ALOS PALSAR detects rapid subsidence due to groundwater and gas extraction. Remote Sens. Environ. 128, 150–161 (2013).
Andreas, H., Abidin, H. Z., Sarsito, D. A. & Pradipta, D. Remotes Sensing Capabilities on Land Subsidence and Coastal Water Hazard and Disaster Studies Vol. 500, 012036 (IOP Publishing, 2020).
Shofiana, R., Subardjo, P. & Pratikto, I. Analisis perubahan penggunaan lahan di wilayah pesisir Kota pekalongan menggunakan data landsat 7 etm+. J. Mar. Res. 2, 35–43 (2013).
Wijaya, A. Analisis Dinamika Pola Spasial Penggunaan Lahan Pada Wilayah Terdampak Kenaikan Muka Air Laut di Kota Pekalongan (2017).
El-Fath, D. D. I., Atmodjo, W., Helmi, M., Widada, S. & Rochaddi, B. Analisis Spasial Area Genangan Banjir Rob Setelah Pembangunan Tanggul di Kabupaten Pekalongan, Jawa Tengah. Indones. J. Oceanogr. 4, 96–110 (2022).
Novita, M. G., Helmi, M., Widiaratih, R., Hariyadi, H. & Wirasatriya, A. Mengkaji Area Genangan Banjir Pasang Terhadap Penggunaan Lahan Pesisir Tahun 2020 Menggunakan Metode Geospasial di Kabupaten Pekalongan, Provinsi Ja. Indones. J. Oceanogr. 3, 14–26 (2021).
Salim, M. A. Penanganan Banjir dan Rob di Wilayah Pekalongan. J. Tek. Sipil 11, 15–23 (2018).
Jumatiningrum, N. & Indrayati, A. Strategi Adaptasi Masyarakat Kelurahan Bandengan Kecamatan Pekalongan Utara dalam Menghadapi Banjir Pasang Air Laut (Rob). Edu Geogr. 9, 136–143 (2021).
BNPB. Data Kebencanaan Nasional (BNPB, 2021).
Giampietro, M., Aspinall, R. J., Ramos-Martin, J. & Bukkens, S. G. Resource Accounting for Sustainability Assessment: The Nexus Between Energy, Food, Water and Land Use (Routledge, 2014).
Meadows, D. H., Randers, J. & Meadows, D. L. The Limits to Growth (1972) (Yale University Press, 2013).
Albrecht, T., Crootof, A. & Scott, C. Trends in the development of water–energy–food nexus methods (2017).
Leck, H., Fitzpatrick, D. & Burchell, K. Energy, water and food: Towards a critical nexus approach. in Handbook on the Geographies of Energy (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017).
Scott, C. A., Kurian, M. & Wescoat, J. L. The water–energy–food nexus: Enhancing adaptive capacity to complex global challenges. in Governing the Nexus 15–38 (Springer, 2015).
Wanty, E. E. Analisis Produksi Batik Cap Dari UKM Batik Kota Pekalongan (Studi Pada Sentra Batik Kota Pekalongan-Jawa Tengah, 2006).
Mankiw, N. G. Macroeconomics Vol. 41 (Worth Publishers, 2003).
Shen, J. & Kee, G. Development and Planning in Seven Major Coastal Cities in Southern and Eastern China (Springer, 2017).
Xu, C., Haase, D., Su, M. & Yang, Z. The impact of urban compactness on energy-related greenhouse gas emissions across EU member states: Population density vs physical compactness. Appl. Energy 254, 113671 (2019).
Marfai, M. A. & Cahyadi, A. Dampak bencana banjir pesisir dan adaptasi masyarakat terhadapnya di kabupaten Pekalongan (2017).
Wartadesa.net. Tiga hari banjir rendam Pekalongan (2018).
Google Maps. A dike in Pekalongan (n.d).
Anindita, R. M., Susilowati, I. & Muhammad, F. Analisis Efektifitas Tanggul Laut di Pesisir Pekalongan Terhadap Penurunan Intensitas Banjir, vol. 2 80–88 (2020).
Taniguchi, M. Groundwater and Subsurface Environments: Human Impacts in Asian Coastal Cities (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).
Baños, C. J., Hernández, M., Rico, A. M. & Olcina, J. The hydrosocial cycle in coastal tourist destinations in Alicante, Spain: Increasing resilience to drought. Sustainability 11, 4494 (2019).
Sauda, R. H. & Nugraha, A. L. Kajian pemetaan kerentanan banjir rob di kabupaten pekalongan. J. Geod. Undip 8, 466–474 (2019).
Wartadesa.net. Ratusan warga Sragi masih mengungsi (2022).
Buchori, I. et al. Adaptation to coastal flooding and inundation: Mitigations and migration pattern in Semarang City, Indonesia. Ocean Coast. Manag. 163, 445–455 (2018).
Setiadi, R. & Nalau, J. Can urban regeneration improve health resilience in a changing climate? (2015).
Isham, A., Mair, S. & Jackson, T. Wellbeing and productivity: A review of the literature (2020).
Banson, K. E., Nguyen, N. C. & Bosch, O. J. Using system archetypes to identify drivers and barriers for sustainable agriculture in Africa: A case study in Ghana. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 33, 79–99 (2016).
Lavrnić, S., Zapater-Pereyra, M. & Mancini, M. Water scarcity and wastewater reuse standards in Southern Europe: Focus on agriculture. Water. Air Soil Pollut. 228, 1–12 (2017).
Tortajada, C. & Nam Ong, C. Reused water policies for potable use (2016).
Murali, R. M., Riyas, M., Reshma, K. & Kumar, S. S. Climate change impact and vulnerability assessment of Mumbai city, India. Nat. Hazards 102, 575–589 (2020).
Abdullah, A. Y. M. et al. Spatio-temporal patterns of land use/land cover change in the heterogeneous coastal region of Bangladesh between 1990 and 2017. Remote Sens. 11, 790 (2019).
Ginanjar, A., Rezagama, A. & Handayani, D. S. Rencana Induk Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum Kota Pekalongan (2015).
Reiblich, J., Hartge, E., Wedding, L., Killian, S. & Verutes, G. Bridging climate science, law, and policy to advance coastal adaptation planning. Mar. Policy 104, 125–134 (2019).
Cook, B. I. et al. Revisiting the leading drivers of Pacific coastal drought variability in the contiguous United States. J. Clim. 31, 25–43 (2018).
Jodar-Abellan, A., Valdes-Abellan, J., Pla, C. & Gomariz-Castillo, F. Impact of land use changes on flash flood prediction using a sub-daily SWAT model in five Mediterranean ungauged watersheds (SE Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1578–1591 (2019).
Thanvisitthpon, N., Shrestha, S. & Pal, I. Urban flooding and climate change: A case study of Bangkok, Thailand. Environ. Urban. Asia 9, 86–100 (2018).
Laksmi, G. S. Dampak Alih Fungsi Lahan dan Curah Hujan terhadap Banjir di Kota Pekalongan, Jawa Tengah, 382–391 (2020).
Dhiman, R., VishnuRadhan, R., Eldho, T. & Inamdar, A. Flood risk and adaptation in Indian coastal cities: Recent scenarios. Appl. Water Sci. 9, 1–16 (2019).
Bahri, M. & Cremades, R. The Urban Drought Nexus Tool. Zenodo (2021).
Disclaimer
The author declares that Fig. 2 is owned by The Museum Batik Pekalongan and the permission letter to reproduce this figure is already obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The corresponding author is the sole author who does every single step from preparation, literature review, and finalizing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Khairulbahri, M. The qualitative analysis of the nexus dynamics in the Pekalongan coastal area, Indonesia. Sci Rep 12, 11391 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15683-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15683-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
