Abstract
Temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) is a mechanism in which environmental temperature, rather than innate zygotic genotype, determines the fate of sexual differentiation during embryonic development. Reeves’ turtle (also known as the Chinese three-keeled pond turtle, Mauremys reevesii) exhibits TSD and is the only species whose genome has been determined in Geoemydidae to date. Thus, M. reevesii occupy phylogenetically important position for the study of TSD and can be compared to other TSD species to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism of this process. Nevertheless, neither embryogenesis nor gonadogenesis has been described in this species. Therefore, herein, we investigated the chronology of normal embryonic development and gonadal structures in M. reevesii under both female- and male-producing incubation temperatures (FPT 31 °C or MPT 26 °C, respectively). External morphology remains indistinct between the two temperature regimes throughout the studied embryonic stages. However, the gonadal ridges present on the mesonephros at stage 16 develop and sexually differentiate at FPT and MPT. Ovarian and testicular structures begin to develop at stages 18–19 at FPT and stages 20–21 at MPT, respectively, and thus, the sexual differentiation of gonadal structures began earlier in the embryos at FPT than at MPT. Our results suggest that temperature sensitive period, at which the gonadal structures remain sexually undifferentiated, spans from stage 16 (or earlier) to stages 18–19 at FPT and to stages 20–21 at MPT. Understanding the temperature-dependent differentiation in gonadal structures during embryonic development is a prerequisite for investigating molecular basis underlying TSD. Thus, the result of the present study will facilitate further developmental studies on TSD in M. reevesii.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sexually dimorphic phenotypes of vertebrates primarily emerge as gonadal sex differentiation during embryonic development. In vertebrates, genetic sex determination is a mechanism of differentiating gonadal sex from a bipotent or undifferentiated state, relying on the dimorphic expression of sex-determining genes usually derived from sexually heteromorphic chromosomes1,2,3. In contrast, alternative sex determination mechanisms are governed by environmental cues, among which temperature is one of the most prevalent in reptile sex determination. Temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) is documented for most turtles, some lizards, all crocodilians, and tuataras, but not snakes4,5,6.
The fate of sexual differentiation in TSD species strongly depends on the environmental temperatures that individuals experience during a critical developmental period, the temperature sensitive period (TSP)7,8,9. TSP has historically been deduced from experiments that shift the egg incubation temperatures during the embryonic development and analyze the resulting sex of the individuals. Interestingly, TSP in turtles and alligator is closely associated with the sexual differentiation of gonadal structures8,9. In vertebrates, the coelomic epithelium thickens and develops into the genital ridges on the mesonephros at early embryonic stages10. The red-eared slider turtle Trachemys scripta shows this general gonadal development pattern, and the beginning of its TSP corresponds to the early stage at which the genital ridges develop, i.e., stage 16 (or earlier)8. The TSP in T. scripta then lasts until the sexually bipotential gonads acquire the ovarian or testicular structures, corresponding to stages 18–19 or 20–21 when incubated under 31 °C or 26 °C, respectively8. After the sexually dimorphic gonads develop, the sex is no longer reversible regardless of the changes in incubation temperature.
Studies on the molecular basis of TSD often investigate the expression of gonadal genes throughout embryonic stages, particularly focusing on the TSP. Recent advents in sequencing techniques have revealed genes presumably involved in gonadal sex differentiation or sexually distinct transcription in TSD species11,12,13,14,15,16, which were further investigated in Alligator mississippiensis and T. scripta embryos using techniques, such as pharmacological treatments12 and genetic manipulations via viral infections17,18. These manipulations were used to evaluate whether the sex expected from a female- or male-producing incubation temperature (FPT or MPT, respectively) could be reversed, assuming that gonadal sex was structurally undifferentiated at the time of these manipulations. Understanding the structural differentiation of gonads throughout embryonic stages is a prerequisite for these studies; this information is available for A. mississippiensis and T. scripta, which makes these species the best models for TSD studies.
Our main objective in the present study is to describe the differentiation of gonadal structures throughout the normal embryonic stages of Reeves’turtle (also known as the Chinese three-keeled pond turtle, Mauremys reevesii), a freshwater species that prevalently inhabits East Asia19. Mauremys reevesii is the only species whose genome has been determined in Geoemydidae to date20, thereby making it phylogenetically important for future comparative studies within and/or between TSD and genotypic sex determination (GSD) turtle species. While T. scripta is an excellent model for the study of TSD, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) listed T. scripta as one of the worst invasive species outside their native distribution21. Due to the ecological status in T. scripta, M. reevesii is a good alternative study model particularly in Asia. Although wild populations of M. reevesii are reportedly under threat in China due to habitat change and human exploitation, cultured individuals are commercially available in China22 and Japan. Du et al.22 reported the TSD of M. reevesii, with a heavily female- and male-biased sex ratio of hatchlings at incubation temperatures above 30 °C and below 26 °C, respectively. This pattern is TSD Ia (i.e., the proportion of females increase with incubation temperature), as in T. scripta5. Thus, M. reevesii can be compared to T. scripta to better understand the temperature dependency of sex determination. As the normal embryonic development and the differentiation of gonadal structures in M. reevesii have not yet been described, the present study investigates the following in M. reevesii: (1) normal embryonic stages, (2) developmental rate under both FPT and MPT, and (3) differentiation of gonadal structures at each embryonic stage. Our findings will provide a basis for effective sampling of embryos and the design of in ovo experiments using M. reevesii.
Results
We described the external morphology of M. reevesii embryos at stages 13–24 and their gonadal structure at stages 16–24. Eye pigmentation was first recognized by candling at stage 13; thus, our analysis began at stage 13. The number of embryos analyzed in this study along with the changes in the egg weight, egg incubation days, embryo weight, incubation temperatures, and key characteristics used for staging M. reevesii are summarized in Fig. 1, Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1. The results of the statistical analyses are summarized in Supplementary Table S2. The changes in egg weight were not correlated with the embryonic stage (P-value = 0.06); however, we found significant positive correlations between the embryonic stage and both the egg incubation days and the embryo weight (P-value < 2.0 × 10–16 and P-value < 2.0 × 10–16, respectively). The result also showed a significant interaction between the incubation temperatures and the egg incubation days (P-value < 2.0 × 10–16). Neither the changes in egg weight nor the embryo weight showed a significant interaction with the incubation temperatures (P-value = 0.50 and P-value = 0.17, respectively). According to the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), the egg incubation days at FPT (r = 0.98, P-value < 2.2 × 10–16) and MPT (r = 0.99, P-value < 2.2 × 10–16), and the embryo weight (r = 0.98, P-value < 2.2 × 10–16) showed strong correlations with the embryonic stage while the correlation between the changes in egg weight and the embryonic stage was weak with r to be 0.32 (P-value = 6.8 × 10–4). No sexual dimorphic features were observed with respect of the external morphology during the embryonic development at either FPT (31 °C) or MPT (26 °C). The representative individual of each stage is shown in Fig. 2 in lateral view, and Supplementary Figures S1 and S2 in dorsal and ventral view, respectively; mandible formations are shown in Fig. 3. The representative digit formations of selected stages are shown in Fig. 4, while those of studied stages are shown in Supplementary Figures S3 and S4 in dorsal and ventral view, respectively. Formations of genital protuberances, urogenital papillae, and vent are shown in Fig. 5. Histology sections of representative gonads for both FPT and MPT are shown in Fig. 6.
Embryonic development
Stage 13
In the lateral view, the anterior edge of the occipital protuberance extends anteriorly beyond the posterior edge of the eye (Figs. 2a, 3a). In the same view, the maxillary process encroaches anteriorly beyond the optic fissure (Figs. 2a, 3a). Pigmentation of the eye is dense, but the pupil and its margin are unpigmented (Figs. 2a, 3a). The optic fissure appears as an unpigmented “triangular” slit at the ventral region of the eye (Fig. 3a). The anterior end of the mandible lies anteriorly beyond the level of the posterior edge of the eye (Fig. 3a). The forelimb buds are longer than wide (Supplementary Fig. S3a, S4a).
Stage 14
In the lateral view, the occipital protuberance recedes posteriorly as its anterior edge is near the level of the posterior edge of the eye (Figs. 2b, 3b). The area between the maxillary and lateral nasal processes—where the external nares are later formed—is weakly marked by shallow creases. The pigmentation of the iris reaches the margin of the unpigmented white pupil (Figs. 2b, 3b). The forelimb bends in caudal orientation (Fig. 2b). The body is more flexed ventrally and the tail is longer and more curled than at stage 13 (Fig. 2b). The genital protuberance is evident, with a slight crease at its posterior margin (Fig. 5b).
Stage 15
The anterior end of the mandible extends to the level of the center of the eye (Fig. 3c). The carapacial ridge becomes visible in lateral view but its anterior edge remains absent and smooth (Fig. 2c). The digital plate is well formed (Fig. 4a). The posterior border of the genital protuberance is evident by a crease between the genital protuberance and the tail (Fig. 5c). The urogenital papilla is slightly distinguished from the entire genital protuberance by a shallow crease (Fig. 5c). The dorsal surface is slightly pigmented from the anterior edge of the carapace to the nostril and at the base of the tail.
Stage 16
The optic fissure is evident but becomes narrower, from a “triangular” to “teardrop” shape (Fig. 3d). The anterior end of the mandible extends beyond the level of the center of the eye (Fig. 3d). An incipient tympanum is barely visible in lateral view. The digital plate has a smooth periphery (Fig. 4b). The carapacial ridge becomes thicker and its anterior edge is distinct in the lateral view (Fig. 2d). The pigmentation becomes denser on the dorsal surface of the neck and head regions and at the base of the tail.
Stage 17
The optic fissure is visible but becomes a narrow slit (Fig. 3e). The caruncle is visible as a small white mark on the rostral tip of the upper jaw (Fig. 3e). The mandible extends anteriorly, the ending of which is between the level of the anterior end of the eye and that of the nostril in the lateral view (Fig. 3e). Each of the five digits can be distinguished by a ridge as the digital plate is slightly serrated (Fig. 4c). The posterior border of the plastron is evident (Fig. 5e). A crease on the posterior border of the genital protuberance extends more laterally (Fig. 5e). The urogenital papilla becomes larger and protrudes as it occupies a large proportion of the genital protuberance (Fig. 5e). Ribs can be slightly seen through the carapace in dorsal view (Supplementary Fig. S1e).
Stage 18
The optical fissure disappears at this stage, and scleral papillae are evident (Fig. 3f). The caruncle is more evident (Fig. 3f). The mandible and the upper jaw make an almost complete closure as the mandible extends anteriorly beyond the level of the anterior end of the eyes in the lateral view (Fig. 3f). Digits II–IV protrude along the periphery of the digital plate but the thickness at the web is greater than the protrusion (Fig. 4d). Carapace pigmentation begins at this stage 18, such that the dorsolateral margins of the carapace are slightly pigmented, exposing the marginal scutes with faint borders (Supplementary Fig. S1f). The plastron remains unpigmented, but it weakly shows the borders of the plastral scutes. The lateral sides of the tail are slightly pigmented, forming lines of pigments (Fig. 5f). A fold is evident surrounding the urogenital papilla (Fig. 5f).
Stage 19
The pigmentation on the head region becomes denser and the external nares are emphasized by the round, unpigmented areas. The lower eyelid is slightly formed. Scleral papillae are distinct (Fig. 3g). The mandible and the upper jaw make a complete closure (Fig. 3g). Digits II–IV protrude as much as or more than the thickness at the web along the periphery of the digital plate (Fig. 4e). The carapace becomes more pigmented, evidencing the borders of all scutes (Supplementary Fig. S1g). The three keels on the carapace are barely visible; one runs along the midline of the vertebral scutes and the other two run through the costal scutes (Supplementary Fig. S1g).
Stage 20
The lower eyelid reaches the scleral papillae (Fig. 3h). The protrusion of digits II–IV proceeds and reaches approximately twice their thickness at the web (Fig. 4f). The digits are weakly pigmented (Fig. 4f). Rows of cutaneous papillae are slightly visible on the dorsal surface of the neck. The entire carapace is pigmented, but the vertebral scutes are more pigmented than the other scutes (Supplementary Fig. S1h). The cutaneous papillae on the vertebral scutes are barely visible in some specimens. The urogenital papilla begins to withdraw into but remains prolapsed from the vent (Fig. 5h).
Stage 21
The scleral papillae disappear or become unclear at this stage (Fig. 3i). The entire body becomes more evidently pigmented (Fig. 2i, Supplementary Figs. S1i, S2i). The pigmentation of the digits becomes denser at the thinner distal ends than the thicker proximal regions on most of specimens, vaguely indicating the border of digits and claws (Fig. 4g). The claws are homogeneously opaque and white-colored with evident pigmentation (Fig. 4i). The scales are slightly visible on the dorsal forelimb, but do not reach the proximal border of the webbing (Fig. 4g,i). The cutaneous papillae on the vertebral scutes are evident. The urogenital papilla withdraws into the vent (Fig. 5i).
Stage 22
The iris becomes distinct and the lower eyelid reaches its outer margin (Fig. 3j). The ungual phalanx enclosed in a translucent sheath is clearly visible including its tip (Fig. 4l). Pigmentation becomes heavier on the dorsal forelimb (Fig. 4j). The scales on the dorsal forelimb extend distally to the ranges of the proximal border of the webbing to the distal region of the digits (Fig. 4j,l). The palmar surface of the forelimb is slightly covered by small circular scales (Fig. 4k), and in some specimens, these scales overlap adjacent scales. Four large circular scales are more evident and aligned along the anteroposterior axis of the palmar surface (Fig. 4k). Each of these four scales slightly overlaps or projects over the surrounding palmar surface. The carapace becomes darker so that the presence of cutaneous papillae on the entire carapace is emphasized. The intestinal loop is withdrawn into the body (Supplementary Fig. S2j).
Stage 23
The ungual phalanx is evident in a translucent sheath (Fig. 4o). The palmar surface of the forelimb is fully covered by small circular scales (Fig. 4n), and their overlap to adjacent scales is evident. The density of the cutaneous papillae increased on the vertebral and pleural scutes. The plastron is more pigmented so that the whitish regions are less than the darker pigmented regions (Supplementary Fig. S2k).
Stage 24
The embryos resemble the hatchlings. The translucent sheath on the ungual phalanx recedes toward its distal end, exposing the ventral surface of the ungual phalanx (Fig. 4r). The individual scales on the forelimb, hindlimb, and tail are evident and overlap one another. The pigmentation becomes darker throughout the body; the pigmentation of the carapace is dark brown in color but that of the plastron and skin is blackish brown. The color contrast increases on the head, exposing a discernible pattern on the lateral and ventral surface of the head (Fig. 3l).
Gonadal development
At stage 16 of both FPT and MPT, the gonadal ridges with inner medulla consisting of sex cords and outer 1–2 cell cortical layer are present on the mesonephros (Fig. 6a,b). At stage 17 of both FPT and MPT, the germ cells with large spherical nuclei and the medullary sex cords become more evident (Fig. 6c,d). At stage 18, the sex cords begin to degenerate in some specimens at FPT (Fig. 6e). By stage 20, the sex cords become disorganized, and the medullary region shows the homogeneous structure at FPT (Fig. 6i), while at MPT, the sex cords become more distinct, developing into the seminiferous tubules (Fig. 6j). As the seminiferous tubules develop at stages 20 and 21, the germ cells are enclosed within the cords at MPT (Fig. 6j,l). During stages 20 and 21, the cortex becomes enlarged and thickened at FPT (Fig. 6i,k); conversely, the cortex becomes a thin one-cell layer at MPT (Fig. 6j,l). From stage 21, the tissue area connecting gonads and the mesonephros begins to decrease, with the gonads becoming merely connected by a narrow stalk of the connective tissues by stage 24 (Fig. 6q,r). At stages 23 and 24, the distinction between cortex and medullary region is more evident and the medullary region becomes vacuolated at FPT (Fig. 6o,q). At stage 24, the seminiferous tubules are developed at MPT (Fig. 6r).
All specimens after stage 21 show sexually distinct gonadal structures, and develop ovarian or testicular structures as expected from the incubation temperatures of FPT or MPT, respectively. No specimen shows gonadal sex reversed from the expected sex at FPT or MPT. The macro images of the gonads at stage 24, or pre-hatching stage, are shown in Supplementary Figure S5.
Discussion
The sex of TSD species is determined during embryonic development, particularly during the TSP, depending on thermal environmental conditions5. Sex determination is primarily recognized by the differentiation of gonadal structures toward testicular or ovarian or testicular developmental pathways. While M. reevesii has been reported to be a TSD species, the chronology of the sexual differentiation of its gonadal structures has not been investigated. In the present study, we analyzed the gonadal development of M. reevesii under both FPT and MPT according to the chronology of its external embryonic morphogenesis.
The embryonic development of M. reevesii regarding its external morphology was analyzed following criteria developed for C. serpentina23 and with a particular reference to the testudinoid species, T. scripta24 and Mauremys japonica25. Several features of M. reevesii were distinct from those of both or either of the latter two species. The claw development is a key to discerning later stages in T. scripta and particularly in M. japonica, but we recognized the characteristics of the claw development at distinct times between M. reevesii and T. scripta/M. japonica, obscuring the equivalent stages across the species. At stage 23, the ungual phalanx is vaguely present in the translucent sheath of T. scripta while that of M. japonica shows a homogeneous structure in the lateral view. At stage 24, the ungual phalanx is evident in the translucent sheath, but its tip remains unclear in the lateral view in both T. scripta and M. japonica. The ungual phalanx (including its tip) becomes evident at stage 25 in these species. Nevertheless, the presence of the ungual phalanx (including its tip) is recognized at an earlier stage in M. reevesii equivalent to stage 22 in T. scripta (Fig. 4l). Thus, the detection of the ungual phalanx in the translucent sheath hardly distinguishes the following stages in M. reevesii. Instead, we defined stage 23 in M. reevesii by referring to the development of the palmar scales in T. scripta at stage 23 when its palmar surface becomes fully covered by small circular scales (Fig. 4n). The translucent sheath begins to recede from the base of the claw toward its distal end during stage 25 until hatching in T. scripta. The recession occurs within a few days of stage 23 in M. reevesii, and thus, we investigated stage 24 based on the recession of the translucent sheath as the last embryonic stage in M. reevesii (Fig. 4r).
The scleral papillae also appear at different times and duration among species. Mauremys reevesii present the scleral papillae at stages 18–20, while T. scripta and M. japonica present those at stage 18 and 19–20, respectively24,25. These variations also occur in other turtles in Yntema’s (1968) stages 16–2123,26. The scleral papillae induce the development of the scleral ossicles that are present in all birds and turtles27. Although controversial, the functional roles of scleral ossicles are presumably adaptive (e.g., to prevent the eyes from physical deformation or visual accommodation)28. Therefore, the interspecific variation in the development of scleral papillae may be involved in species-specific visual adaptation.
One of the most evident differences in external morphology between T. scripta and M. reevesii/M. japonica is the carapacial keel that appears as only one ridge in the former species but as three ridges in the latter two. The three keels appear from stage 19 in M. reevesii. Although there is only a single keel running at the midline of the vertebral scute in T. scripta, its formation begins at stage 19. The three keels also occur in distantly related turtle species, such as Sternotherus odoratus (Chelyroidea, Chelyroidae), which also shows primary evidence of keel development at stage 2029. Interestingly, this suggests that the embryonic chronology of the carapacial diversity in turtles is conserved, when staged according to Yntema (1968). Nevertheless, embryos of different species at the same Yntema (1968) stage do not necessarily have the same degree of embryonic development. Thus, the development of certain characters should ideally be discussed based on relative timing throughout development, as in Tokita and Kuratani30. Further studies on carapace development around stage 19–20 could reveal whether the genetic mechanisms regulating keel development are the same among species and will elucidate the genetic basis underlying carapacial diversity. The present results show that the development of the external morphology of M. reevesii is more similar to that of M. japonica than that of T. scripta, as expected based on their phylogenetic distance31.
We then described the gonadal development of M. reevesii from stages 16 to 24 using the histology of the gonads. Although TSP generally begins at early stages, when the sexually undifferentiated gonadal ridge is formed, TSP ends at different stages depending on the incubation temperature8,9. In T. scripta, the sex cords begin to degenerate at stages 18–19 at 31 °C, but develop into seminiferous tubules at stages 20–21 at 26 °C8. Structural differentiation arises as the first evidence of gonadal sex differentiation in T. scripta and corresponds to the end of TSP8,32. According to the chronology of sexual differentiation of gonadal structures, the results suggest that TSP in M. reevesii occurs at stage 16 or earlier and lasts until stages 18–19 and 20–21 at FPT and MPT, respectively. The development of gonads in M. reevesii followed similar patterns and chronology to that of T. scripta.
The development of external morphology in M. reevesii proceeds at a higher rate at FPT than at MPT (Fig. 1b, Table 1, Supplementary Table S2) but remains indistinct between the two temperature regimes throughout the studied developmental stages. Interestingly, gonadal sex differentiation is strongly associated with the stages. We calibrated the initial date of the analysis using egg candling and showed that the incubation days from stage 13 provide clues to predict each stage for FPT and MPT (Fig. 1b, Table 1, Supplementary Table S2). While the egg weight seems to change independently of the embryonic stage (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table S2), the embryo weight increases with embryonic development, at an insignificant rate between the two incubation temperatures (Fig. 1c, Table 1, Supplementary Table S2), suggesting that the embryo weight can also be a parameter to support staging regardless of incubation temperatures (Fig. 1c). These results facilitate the effective sampling of embryos at target stages in M. reevesii.
Effects of incubation temperatures on embryo weight have been previously reported in M. reevesii33, softshelled turtle Pelodiscus sinensis34, and chicken35. Nevertheless, no general trend between incubation temperatures and embryo weight has been observed, at least from these studies, showing that high incubation temperatures resulted in larger and smaller embryo weight in chicken35 and M. reevesii33, respectively, and intermediate incubation temperature resulted in larger embryo weight in P. sinensis34. Wei et al. (2021) 33 showed that the difference in body mass of M. reevesii hatchling becomes insignificant by the age of 12 months. Therefore, whether the distinct thermal sensitivities in embryo weight could be explained by any adaptive significance remains elusive. As Yabe36 showed that wild-caught individuals of M. reevesii in Japan were larger in female than male, factors, such as the growth rate or the longevity, after hatching could have a more important effect on sexual dimorphism in body size.
The present study described the development of external and gonadal morphology in M. reevesii under two temperature regimes, namely FPT and MPT, and recorded the time required to reach each stage. The external morphology follows developmental trajectory indistinct between FPT and MPT but the gonadal structures sexually differentiate in temperature-dependent manner after stages 18–19 and 20–21 at FPT and MPT, respectively. We showed that the embryonic stages and associated state of the gonadal differentiation in M. reevesii are well predictable as a function of the incubation days and temperatures. Stages at which gonadal structures remain sexually undifferentiated are particularly important as often be the target for in ovo experiments on sex determination. Thus, the current study establishes the basis for designing in ovo functional analysis of target molecules using pharmacological treatments and/or genetic manipulations via viral infections. Further intra- and interspecific comparisons of TSD species including M. reevesii will further explain how temperature stimuli regulate genetic responses towards sex determination.
Materials and methods
All experiments involving animals and their care were conducted in compliance with ARRIVE guidelines37,38. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The present study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Tokyo University of Science (No. K22011). Turtle eggs were purchased from Kondo farm in Maniwa, Okayama, Japan from June to August 2020 and from June to July 2021. The eggs were collected by farmers 1–3 days from oviposition, but some older eggs may have been accidentally included. The eggs were then transported to the laboratory at Tokyo University of Science, where they were immediately divided into two groups at random and incubated in environmental chambers (Panasonic MIR-554-PJ, Sanyo MIR-253, or Sanyo MIR-153) at a constant temperature of 31 °C (FPT) or 26 °C (MPT). The incubation containers (length × width × height = 23.5 cm × 16.5 cm × 4 cm) were half-filled with vermiculite:water (1:1 ratio) (Setogahara Kaen, Kidori, Gunma, Japan). Each container housed up to 20 uniformly arranged eggs and was placed in a ziplocked plastic bag to maintain humidity. Every three or four days, the containers were ventilated, rehydrated, and rotated in the chamber to reduce the influence of potential thermal heterogeneity. Although the exact date of oviposition was unknown, the appearance of the pigmented eye, observed using the egg candling technique (pigmentation becomes denser with embryonic development), was used to standardize the ages of the eggs. Thus, the initial date at which eye pigmentation was observed was recorded as Day 0 of the investigation.
Embryonic and gonadal development was investigated using 198 embryos of M. reevesii. Egg weight was recorded on the day of arrival and of dissection. Five to six embryos were dissected every sampling day for each temperature treatment in phosphate-buffered saline and under a microscope (Olympus SZ61), and then weighed without the extraembryonic membranes. Gonad-mesonephros complex (GMC) of some of embryos were excised for histological analysis on gonadal development. Whole body and GMC were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C and then in methanol at increasing concentrations (25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 %). The fixed embryos were photographed with or without the microscope using a camera (Olympus TG-6), examined, and staged referring to the criteria described for Chelydra serpentina23 and phylogenetically more closely related species, T. scripta and M. japonica, to M. reevesii24,25,31. In T. scripta and M. japonica, stages 13–25 were defined primarily based on forelimb morphology; therefore, forelimb morphology was also used herein as a primary criterion for staging in M. reevesii. In the present study, forelimb morphology between adjacent stages was sometimes indistinct (see “Results”). In such cases, other characteristics, such as eye or carapace development, were referenced in combination with forelimb morphology as the primary criterion. For clarity when describing morphological features, the embryos were rotated, and the lateral view was fixed. In other words, for describing stages 13–16, the lateral view is set as the optic fissure is at the bottom of the microscopic field. For describing stages 17–18, the lateral view is set as the line of the upper jaw lies horizontally in the microscopic field.
We investigated the factors that help to predict the embryonic stages by conducting ordinary least squares (OLS) analyses in which the embryonic stage was used as the response variable, while the changes in egg weight, the incubation days, the embryo weight, and the first order interaction between the incubation temperatures and those three variables were used as the explanatory variables. The embryo weight was log-transformed when analyzed. The OLS regression was fitted to the data using the lm function in R. Then, we analyzed how well, if any, the variable(s) correlate with the embryonic stage based on the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Stage 24 in M. reevesii lasts until hatching as it is the last and pre-hatching stage. Unlike earlier stages, the duration of stage 24 depends on the timing of hatching rather than changes in specific key morphological characters. Thus, we excluded the parameters at stage 24 from the statistical analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.0; https://cran.r-project.org), and graphs were produced using the R package “ggplot2”39.
Histological analysis of the gonads was conducted for each of the embryonic stages at both incubation temperatures. The fixed GMC were embedded in histological paraffin and cut into 8-µm thick sections. Each section was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) using a standard procedure and photographed under a microscope (Olympus BX53) with a mounted digital camera (Olympus DP72). Images and graphs were edited and formatted using programs Preview 11.0 (Apple, Inc.), Adobe Photoshop (version 23.1.1), and Adobe Illustrator (version 26.0.2). The description and identification of the gonadal structures followed the terminology proposed for T. scripta by Wibbels et al. (1991)8.
Data availability
Raw pictures in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and in Supplementary Figures S1–S5 are available upon request. Parameters used to produce Fig. 1 are listed in Supplementary Table 1 and R scripts utilized herein are available upon request. The results of the statistical analysis (i.e., the ordinary least square analysis) are summarized in Supplementary Table S2.
References
Koopman, P., Gubbay, J., Vivian, N., Goodfellow, P. & Lovell-Badge, R. Male development of chromosomally female mice transgenic for Sry. Nature 351, 117–121 (1991).
Smith, C. A. et al. The avian Z-linked gene DMRT1 is required for male sex determination in the chicken. Nature 461, 267–271 (2009).
Lambeth, L. S. et al. Over-expression of DMRT1 induces the male pathway in embryonic chicken gonads. Dev. Biol. 389, 160–172 (2014).
Bull, J. J. Sex determination in reptiles. Q. Rev. Biol. 55, 3–21 (1980).
Valenzuela, N. & Lance, V. A. (eds) Temperature dependent sex determination in vertebrates (Smithsonian Books, 2004).
Rhen, T. & Schroeder, A. Molecular mechanisms of sex determination in reptiles. Sex. Dev. 4, 16–28 (2010).
Bull, J. J. Temperature-sensitive periods of sex determination in a lizard: Similarities with turtles and crocodilians. J. Exp. Zool. 241, 143–148 (1987).
Wibbels, T., Bull, J. J. & Crews, D. Chronology and morphology of temperature-dependent sex determination. J. Exp. Zool. 260, 371–381 (1991).
Lang, J. W. & Andrews, H. V. Temperature-dependent sex determination in crocodilians. J. Exp. Zool. 270, 28–44 (1994).
Pieau, C., Dorizzi, M. & Richard-Mercier, N. Temperature-dependent sex determination and gonadal differentiation in reptiles. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55, 887–900 (1999).
Czerwinski, M., Natarajan, A., Barske, L., Looger, L. L. & Capel, B. A timecourse analysis of systemic and gonadal effects of temperature on sexual development of the red-eared slider turtle Trachemys scripta elegans. Dev. Biol. 420, 166–177 (2016).
Yatsu, R. et al. TRPV4 associates environmental temperature and sex determination in the American alligator. Sci. Rep. 5, 18581. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18581 (2016).
Radhakrishnan, S., Literman, R., Neuwald, J., Severin, A. & Valenzuela, N. Transcriptomic responses to environmental temperature by turtles with temperature-dependent and genotypic sex determination assessed by RNAseq inform the genetic architecture of embryonic gonadal development. PLoS ONE 12, e0172044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172044 (2017).
Xiong, L. et al. Transcriptome sequencing and comparative analysis of adult ovary and testis identify potential gonadal maintenance-related genes in Mauremys reevesii with temperature-dependent sex determination. PeerJ 7, e6557. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6557 (2019).
Bista, B., Wu, Z., Literman, R. & Valenzuela, N. Thermosensitive sex chromosome dosage compensation in ZZ/ZW softshell turtles, Apalone spinifera. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200101. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0101 (2021).
Chow, J. C. et al. Tissue and temperature-specific RNA-seq analysis reveals genomic versatility and adaptive potential in wild sea turtle hatchlings (Caretta caretta). Animals 11, 3013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113013 (2021).
Ge, C. et al. The histone demethylase KDM6B regulates temperature-dependent sex determination in a turtle species. Science 360, 645–648 (2018).
Weber, C. et al. Temperature-dependent sex determination is mediated by pSTAT3 repression of Kdm6b. Science 368, 303–306 (2020).
Lovich, J. E., Ernst, C. H. & Gotte, S. W. Geographic Variation in the Asiatic Turtle Chinemys reevesii (Gray) and the Status of Geoclemys grangeri Schmidt. J. Herpetol. 19, 238–245 (1985).
Liu, J. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the Chinese three-keeled pond turtle (Mauremys reevesii) provides insights into freshwater adaptation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22, 1596–1605 (2022).
Lowe, S. M., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S. & De Poorter, M. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN). First published as special lift-out in Aliens, vol. 12 (2000).
Du, W. G., Hu, L. J., Lu, J. L. & Zhu, L. J. Effects of incubation temperature on embryonic development rate, sex ratio and post-hatching growth in the Chinese three-keeled pond turtle Chinemys reevesii. Aquaculture 272, 747–753 (2007).
Yntema, C. L. A series of stages in the embryonic development of Chelydra serpentina. J. Morphol. 125, 219–252 (1968).
Greenbaum, E. A standardized series of embryonic stages for the emydid turtle Trachemys scripta. Can. J. Zool. 80, 1350–1370 (2002).
Okada, Y., Yabe, T. & Oda, S. Embryonic development of the Japanese pond turtle, Mauremys japonica (Testudines: Geoemydidae). Curr. Herpetol. 30, 89–102 (2011).
Franz-Odendaal, T. A. Intramembranous ossification of scleral ossicles in Chelydra serpentina. Zoology 109, 75–81 (2006).
Franz-Odendaal, T. A. & Hall, B. K. Skeletal elements within teleost eyes and a discussion of their homology. J. Morphol. 267, 1326–1337 (2006).
Lima, F. C. et al. Anatomy of the scleral ossicles in Brazilian birds. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci. 26, 165–169 (2009).
Paredes, D. S., Lord, A., Meyer, D. & Bhullar, B. S. A developmental staging system and musculoskeletal development sequence of the common musk turtle (Sternotherus odoratus). Dev. Dyn. 250, 111–127 (2021).
Tokita, M. & Kuratani, S. Normal Embryonic Stages of the Chinese Softshelled Turtle Pelodiscus sinensis (Trionychidae). Zool. Sci. 18, 705–715 (2001).
Thomson, R. C., Spinks, P. Q. & Shaffer, H. B. A global phylogeny of turtles reveals a burst of climate-associated diversification on continental margins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2012215118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012215118 (2021).
Ramsey, M. & Crews, D. Steroid signaling and temperature-dependent sex determination—Reviewing the evidence for early action of estrogen during ovarian determination in turtles. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 283–292 (2009).
Wei, Y. et al. Effect of incubation temperature and substrate moisture on embryonic development, hatchling phenotypes and post-hatching growth in the Reeves’ Turtle. Mauremys reevesii. PeerJ 9, e10553. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10553 (2021).
Du, W. G. & Ji, X. The effects of incubation thermal environments on size, locomotor performance and early growth of hatchling soft-shelled turtles Pelodiscus sinensis. J. Therm. Biol. 28, 279–286 (2003).
Collins, K. E. et al. No evidence of temperature-dependent sex determination or sex-biased embryo mortality in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 92, 3096–3102 (2013).
Yabe, T. Population structure and male melanism in the Reeves’ turtle Chinemys reevesii. Japan. J. Herpetol. 15, 131–137 (1994).
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M. & Altman, D. G. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 8, e10004122010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 (2010).
du Percie Sert, N. et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 (2020).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank T. Iguchi, Yokohama City University, Japan, for his critical comments on this manuscript. We also thank M. Takeda, Himeji City Aquarium, Japan, for generously providing us with eggs of Trachemys scripta as a reference to analyze the embryonic development of Mauremys reevesii. We are grateful to members of S. Miyagawa laboratory, Tokyo University of Science, Japan, especially Y. Yoshizawa and S. Okano for preparing a supplemental figure, and also K. Ueda, T. Inuzuka, M. Ishikawa, S. Yanagawa, I. Hirayama, and S. Masuda for the maintenance of turtle eggs in captivity at the Tokyo University of Science. This work was partly supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows [Grant Number JP19J01186 (H.A.)], Fostering Joint International Research B [Grant Number JP19KK0184 (H.A.)], Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists [Grant Number JP21K15166 (H.A.) and JP20K15835 (G.Y.)], Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research B [Grant Number JP21H02522 (S.M.)], and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas [Grant Number JP17H06432 (S.M.)] from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.A. conceived and designed the study. H.A., M.K., H.Y., and K.M. fixed the embryos and investigated their external morphology. H.A. conducted the statistical analysis. M.K. and H.Y. conducted histological sectioning. All authors investigated the external and gonadal morphology. H.A. wrote the original draft, prepared tables and figures, and all authors contributed to review, comment, and edit the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Akashi, H., Kubota, M., Yamamoto, H. et al. Chronology of embryonic and gonadal development in the Reeves’ turtle, Mauremys reevesii. Sci Rep 12, 11619 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15515-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15515-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.