Introduction

Fluctuations that lead to a decrease in oxygen availability are common in nature1. The physiological and behavioral response to oxygen deprivation has been studied in animals that naturally experience oxygen deprivation, such as frogs, goldfish, and turtles1,2,3, as well as in invertebrate genetic models4,5,6. When oxygen deprived, these organisms must face the challenge of a drastic drop in the production of the energy-storing metabolite adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which leads to the failure of energy-demanding processes that are crucial for maintaining cellular homeostasis. Anoxia-tolerant organisms, however, are capable of saving energy by stopping energy-costly cellular functions (e.g., protein synthesis, ion pumping, and cell cycle progression), maintaining stable and low permeability of membranes, and producing ATP by anaerobic glycolysis2,6,7.

When parasitic and free-living nematodes, including the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, are experimentally exposed to anoxia (< 0.001 kPa O2), the intracellular ATP/ADP ratio drops dramatically and, within 10 h, they enter a state of reversible metabolic arrest called suspended animation. Once in this state, C. elegans stop to eat, move, develop or lay eggs, implying that oxygen deprivation affects their growth and behavior8,9,10. If these effects can be reversed upon oxygen reestablishment, the latter can also provoke a massive and sudden production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that may overwhelm the organism’s antioxidant defense, and cause its death (reviewed in1). Of note, an increase in mitochondrial ROS production was also observed in worms under hypoxia, because of the inefficient transfer of electrons to molecular oxygen11,12.

Because oxygen diffuses slowly through aqueous solutions, sharp concentration gradients of this electron acceptor may occur in marine environments and wet soil13. It is at oxic-anoxic interfaces of marine sands that free-living nematodes coated with sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria (Stilbonematinae) abound14,15,16,17. However, up to this study, the molecular mechanisms allowing symbiotic nematodes to withstand anoxia, and the inherent stress it is known to inflict upon metazoans, were unknown. Here, we incubated Laxus oneistus18 in conditions resembling those it encounters in its natural environment (i.e., anoxic sulfidic or hypoxic), and applied comparative transcriptomics, proteomics and lipidomics to understand how it copes with oxygen deprivation. Contrarily to our expectations, in anoxic sulfidic water Laxus oneistus did not enter suspended animation. However, it upregulated genes required for ribosome biogenesis and energy generation, and for degradation pathways (e.g., ubiquitination-proteasome systems, autophagy) likely involved in recycling damaged cellular components and misfolded proteins into nutrients. Notably, under anoxic sulfidic conditions, it also upregulated putative symbiont-binding molecules such as lectins. In the presence of oxygen, on the other hand, the worm appeared to overexpress genes involved in energy-demanding processes (e.g., amino acid synthesis, development, feeding, and mating) and upregulated the synthesis of broad-range antimicrobials, likely via triggering the Toll/NF-kB pathway.

Results and discussion

The nematode Laxus oneistus did not enter suspended animation upon 24 h in anoxia

To survive anoxia, nematodes enter suspended animation to suppress metabolism and conserve energy. The most notorious sign of suspended animation is the arrest of motility5,10.

Surprisingly, although the whole population of four tested nematode species, including C. elegans, was reported to be in suspended animation upon 10 h in anoxia10, L. oneistus kept moving not only after 24-h-long incubations, but also upon 6-day-long incubations in anoxic seawater (three batches of 50 worms were incubated under each condition). Additionally, the symbiotic nematodes appeared morphologically normal (Supplemental Movies 14).

The fact that we could not observe suspended animation, led us to hypothesize that L. oneistus evolved unprecedented strategies to survive oxygen deprivation.

Stable transcriptional profile under hypoxic or anoxic sulfidic conditions

To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying L. oneistus response to oxygen, we subjected it to various oxygen concentrations. Namely, nematode batches were incubated under either normoxic (100% air saturation; O), hypoxic (30% air saturation; H) or anoxic (0% air saturation; A) conditions for 24 h. Additionally, given that L. oneistus thrives in reduced sand containing up to 25 µM sulfide16,17, we also incubated it in anoxic seawater supplemented with < 25 µM sulfide (anoxic sulfidic condition; AS; see16 for the sulfide concentration experienced by L. oneistus during each incubation).

Whereas transcriptional differences of the symbiont Candidatus Thiosymbion oneisti incubated under normoxic (O) and hypoxic (H) conditions were negligible16, the expression profiles of nematode batches incubated under O conditions varied so much that they did not cluster (Fig. S1). Consequently, there was no detectable differential expression between the transcriptomes of O nematodes and any of the other transcriptomes (H, A or AS; Fig. S1B, C). We attribute the erratic transcriptional response of L. oneistus to normoxia to the fact that this concentration is not naturally experienced by L. oneistus16,17.

As for the expression profiles of nematodes subjected to the H, A or AS conditions, replicates of each condition behaved more congruently (Fig. S1B). However, we did not find any significant difference between the A and AS nematodes and only 0.05% of the genes (8 genes; Data S1) were differentially expressed between the H and A nematodes. Moreover, even at the proteome level, there was no significant difference between the H and A incubations (t-test, Benjamini–Hochberg correction, p < 0.05; Fig. S2A, Data S1). Finally, only the comparison of the AS and H transcriptomes resulted in 4.8% of the expressed genes (787 out of 16,526) being differentially expressed, with 434 genes being upregulated under the AS condition and 353 being upregulated under the H condition (Fig. S1C, Data S1).

Collectively, our data suggests that L. oneistus may be ill-equipped to handle normoxic sediment, but it maintains a largely stable physiological profile under all other conditions. Before discussing the subset of biological processes differentially upregulated in AS versus H nematodes and vice versa, we will present the physiological processes the worm appears to mostly engage with, irrespective of the environmental conditions we experimentally subjected it to.

Top-expressed transcripts under all tested conditions

To gain insights on L. oneistus basal physiology, we treated all 16 transcriptomes as biological replicates (i.e., O, H, A and AS transcriptomes were pooled) and identified the 100 most abundant transcripts out of 16,526 based on functional categories extracted from the UniProt database19 and comprehensive literature search (Fig. 1, Data S2). Our manual classification was supported by automatic eggNOG classification (Data S2). Similarly, the H and A proteomes were pooled, and the 100 most abundant proteins out of 2,626 were detected (Fig. S2).

Figure 1
figure 1

Relative transcript abundance and expression levels of the top 100 expressed genes of L. oneistus across all conditions. (A) Relative transcript abundance (%) of the top 100 expressed genes with a manually curated functional category. The top 100 expressed genes were collected by averaging the expression values (log2TPM) across all replicates of all incubations (Fig. S1A, Data S1, and S2). Functional classifications were extracted from UniProt and from comprehensive literature search focused mainly on C. elegans, and confirmed with the automatically annotated eggNOG classification (Data S1). (B) Median gene expression levels of selected L. oneistus manually annotated functional categories of the top 100 expressed genes. Metabolic processes include both differentially and constitutively expressed genes. Each dot represents the average log2TPM value per gene across all replicates of all incubations. All gene names (or locus tags for unidentified gene names) are listed in Data S2.

Based on median gene expression values of the top 100 expressed genes, we found that some of the processes L. oneistus mostly engages with were ubiquitination (ubq-120), energy generation (e.g., globin glb-1-like21), cytochrome c oxidase I subunit ctc-1 (UniProtKB P24893), nduo-4-like (UniProtKB P24892), stress response and detoxification (e.g., hsp-1, hsp-90, hsp12.2, and catalases ctl-1 and ctl-222,23), and immune defense (lysozyme-like proteins and lec-3) (Fig. 1, Data S2).

Lastly, 48 out of the top 100 most expressed genes, were also detected among the top 100 proteins (Fig. 1, Fig. S2, and Data S2, Supplemental material). Despite the modest Spearman correlation between transcript and protein levels (ρ = 0.4, p-value < 0.01) (Fig. S3A), there was an overlap in the detected biological processes (e.g., energy generation, stress response or detoxification categories, carbohydrate metabolism, cytoskeleton, locomotion, nervous system) (Figs. S2, S3B). All in all, except for those encoding for immune effectors, top-transcribed L. oneistus genes could not be unambiguously ascribed to its symbiotic lifestyle. This differs to what has been observed for other chemosynthetic hosts, such as giant tubeworms and clams. It is perhaps because these animals acquire their endosymbionts horizontally and feed on them (as they are housed intracellularly) that they abundantly express genes involved in symbiont acquisition, proliferation control and digestion24,25,26. Notably, we did observe a partial overlap of the most expressed gene categories (e.g., oxidative stress, energy generation, immune response), when L. oneistus was compared to the marine gutless annelid Olavius algarvensis. We ascribe the overlap to the fact that, albeit endosymbiotic, O. algarvensis also inhabits shallow water sand (Fig. S4, Supplemental material) and, as hypothesized for L. oneistus, it may also acquire its symbionts vertically27,28,29.

To conclude, although both symbiont16 and host transcriptomics do not suggest a high degree of inter-partner metabolic dependence in the L. oneistus ectosymbiosis, the nematode seems well-adapted to both anoxic sulfidic (AS) and hypoxic (H) sand (Fig. 2, Data S1). The transcriptional response of the worm to these two conditions is, however, significant (Fig. 2, Data S1), and it will be reported below.

Figure 2
figure 2

Median gene expression levels of selected L. oneistus metabolic processes among the differentially expressed genes between the hypoxic (H) and anoxic sulfidic (AS) conditions after 24 h. Individual processes among the differentially expressed genes are ordered according to their difference in median expression between the AS and H incubations. Namely, detoxification (far left) had the largest difference in median expression in the AS condition, whereas immune response (far right) had the largest median expression difference in the H condition. The absolute number of genes are indicated at the top of each process. Metabolic processes were manually assigned and confirmed with the automatic annotated eggNOG classification. For specific gene assignments see Data S1. Some genes are present in more than one functional category and processes comprising only one gene are not displayed in the figure but listed in Data S1.

Genes upregulated in anoxic sulfidic (AS) nematodes

Chaperones and detoxification

The expression of chaperone-encoding (e.g., hsp12.2, grpE, dnaJ/dnj-2, pfd-1, pfd-630,31,32) and ROS-detoxification-related genes (e.g., superoxide dismutase sod-2 and a putative glutathione peroxidase, involved in the detoxification of superoxide byproducts and hydrogen peroxide, respectively33) were higher in AS nematodes (Figs. 2 and 3). Notably, transcripts encoding for the heme-binding cytochrome P450 cyp-13B1 were also more abundant in AS (Fig. 3), perhaps to increase the worm’s capacity to cope with putative ROS formation34. Indeed, as cells start being oxygen-depleted, mitochondrial ROS accumulate because of the inefficient transfer of electrons to molecular oxygen11,12. Alternatively, the upregulation of antioxidant-related genes in AS worms could represent an anticipation response to an imminent reoxygenation. In animals alternating between anoxic and oxygenated habitats, the re-exposure to oxygen can be very dangerous, as it creates a sudden ROS overproduction that may overwhelm the oxidative defense mechanisms1. Although it has not been reported for nematodes, overexpression of ROS-counteracting genes is consistent with what has been reported for vertebrates and marine gastropods which, just like L. oneistus, alternate between oxygen-depletion and reoxygenation1.

Figure 3
figure 3

Genes involved in detoxification, ubiquitin–proteasome, autophagy, apoptosis, and amino acids degradation were predominantly expressed in AS worms. Heatmap displaying genes upregulated in AS (anoxic sulfidic) relative to H (hypoxic) worms after 24 h-long incubations under one of the two conditions (1.5-fold change, FDR ≤ 0.05). Expression levels are displayed as mean-centered log2TPM value (transcripts per kilobase million). Genes are ordered by function in their respective metabolic pathways. For each process, the minority of genes that were upregulated in H worms is shown in Data S1. Red denotes upregulation, and blue downregulation. Prot. protein, COP9: Constitutive photomorphogenesis 9. dcp: domain-containing proteins; Put. glut. peroxid.: putative glutamate peroxidase; Put. sarc. oxid.: putative sarcosine oxidase.

Mitochondrial and cytoplasmic ribosome biogenesis

In the cellular stress imposed by oxygen deprivation, mitochondria are central to both death and survival (reviewed in7). In this scenario, calcium regulation, the scavenging of ROS or the suppression of their production, and/or inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening, might help to preserve mitochondrial function and integrity7,35. In addition, removal of specific mitochondrial components (mitochondrial-associated protein degradation, MAD), might also arise to maintain the overall mitochondrial homeostasis36. Perhaps as a response to anoxia-induced stress (reviewed in7), a gene involved in MAD (vms-1)36 was upregulated in AS worms (Fig. 4). More abundant in this condition were also transcripts encoding for mitochondrial transmembrane transporters tin-44, slc-25A26 and C16C10.1 (UniProtKB O02161, Q18934, Q09461), putatively transporting peptide-containing proteins from the inner membrane into the mitochondrial matrix, such as S-Adenosyl methionine (Fig. 6). Surprisingly, although the translation elongation factor eef-1A.237 was downregulated in AS worms, not only various mitochondrial ribosome structural components (28S: mrps, 39S: mrpl)38, and mitochondrial translation-related genes (e.g., C24D10.6 and W03F8.3)39 were upregulated in AS nematodes, but also several cytoplasmic ribosome biogenesis (40S: rps, 60S: rpl)40 and subunit assembly genes (e.g., RRP7A−like)41 (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Genes involved in translation and energy generation and genes encoding for C-type lectins and mucins were predominantly expressed in AS worms. Heatmap displaying genes upregulated in AS (anoxic sulfidic) relative to H (hypoxic) worms, upon 24 h-long incubations under one of the two conditions (1.5-fold change, FDR ≤ 0.05). Expression levels are displayed as mean-centered log2TPM values (transcripts per kilobase million). Genes are ordered by function in their respective metabolic pathways. For each process, the minority of genes that were upregulated in H worms is shown in Data S1. Red denotes upregulation, and blue downregulation. Fp, family-containing protein; Cytoch. C ox. su. II: cytochrome c oxidase subunit II; Ubiq./rhodoq biosynth.: Ubiquinone or rhodoquinone biosynthesis.

Taken together, the maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis, an anticipatory response to a potential upcoming ROS insult (see “Chaperones and detoxification” section) and/or their involvement in extra-ribosomal functions42,43 might explain the upregulation of ribosomal biogenesis-related genes in AS nematodes. Although upregulation of ribosomal proteins has also been observed in gastropods exposed to anoxia44, increased ribosomal biogenesis (which oftentimes directly correlates with an increase in protein synthesis) is not expected in animals that must repress their metabolism to cope with oxygen deprivation3.

Energy generation

Equally surprising was the upregulation of all differentially expressed genes related to energy generation in AS nematodes (Fig. 4). Namely, besides putative oxygen-binding globulin-like genes (e.g., glb-1, glb-14)21, the following were upregulated in AS nematodes: key structural genes (e.g., atp-3, atp-5)45, assembly-related genes (H+-transport ATP synthase)46 of the mitochondrial ATP synthase (complex V), genes related to complex I (lpd-5, nuo-2)47,48, a subunit of the succinate dehydrogenase involved in complex II (mev-1)49, a mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit II assembly gene related to complex IV (sco-1)50, and a mitochondrial gene (coq-5), involved in the synthesis of either ubiquinone (Q, aerobic) or rhodoquinone (RQ, anaerobic) electron carriers51 (Fig. 4). This suggests that, under anoxia, the electron transfer chain (ETC) is rewired: the electrons still enter the ETC at complex I, but do not reach complex III and IV. Instead, complex II, which in aerobic conditions functions as a succinate dehydrogenase, is repurposed into a reductase, which shuttles electron from the electron donor rhodoquinone to the electron acceptor fumarate. This mechanism would maintain the flow of electrons through the ETC, and it would prevent mitochondrial ATP generation (complex V) from shutting down51,52.

In short, under AS, similarly to what has been observed in other free-living and parasitic nematodes, complex I appears to be the sole proton pump in this truncated form of ETC51,52. In accordance with this hypothesis, tryptophan (Trp) degradation-related genes (acsd-1, acsd-2) and the Trp RNA ligase (wars-1)53 that might be required to synthesize RQ51,52 were upregulated under AS. Intriguingly, an isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (idh-1) was also upregulated. This produces reducing equivalent (NADPH) carrying electrons that may fuel complex I54, but it might also add to the stimulation of the antioxidant capacity or to the maintenance of redox homeostasis by regenerating reduced glutathione1,55.

If glycolysis is a key process for ATP generation in anoxia3 and if, consistently, hxk-2 was upregulated under this condition (Fig. 6), based on the expression levels of transcripts encoding for alpha-amylases (see “Carbohydrate metabolism” in Fig. 6), starch and/or glycogen56 may be the prominent carbon sources under anoxic sulfidic conditions.

Ubiquitin–proteasome system and proteases

Proteolysis supplies amino acids or polypeptides to the cells, while impeding the accumulation of damaged or misfolded proteins. The two main mechanisms of cellular proteolysis are the lysosome-mediated intracellular protein degradation (autophagy) and the proteasome-mediated protein degradation (ubiquitin–proteasome system, UPS). In the latter, ubiquitin-protein ligases covalently attach ubiquitin to proteins, allowing their recognition and further degradation by the proteasome57.

As shown in Fig. 1, transcripts encoding for polyubiquitin (ubq-1), had the highest median gene expression across all transcriptomes. However, all ubiquitination-related genes detected in the differential gene expression analysis between the AS and H conditions, were upregulated in AS worms (Fig. 2 and 3, Data S1). For example, aos-1, encoding for a subunit of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1)58, two ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s without detected cullin domains)57, and kelch-like genes (e.g., kel-8-like and kel-20). The former are BTB-domain containing proteins known to interact with E3 enzymes, with kel-8 being involved in the degradation of glutamate neuroreceptors59. Additional ubiquitination-related genes upregulated in AS were csn-2, encoding for a component of the COP9 signalosome complex60, and proteasome genes (pas-2 and pas-3)57.

Among the proteases that were upregulated in AS worms, aspartyl proteases have been involved in neurodegeneration61, whereas plasminogen and the zinc matrix metalloproteinase ZMP-2 were both reported to mediate degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM)62 (Fig. 3). C. elegans ZMP-2 was also shown to prevent the accumulation of oxidized lipoproteins62, and therefore, it may contribute to the enhanced antioxidant response observed in this condition.

Autophagy and amino acid degradation

Besides acting coordinately to withstand stress, autophagy cooperates with apoptotic UPS for the recovery and supply of nutrients when these are scarce (reviewed in63,64). Transcripts of two autophagy-related genes, bec-165 and the Ragulator complex protein LAMTOR4 (C7orf59-like)66 were more abundant in AS nematodes (Fig. 3). While the former positively regulates autophagy65, the latter interacts with the mTOR Complex I (mTORC1), and tethers small GTPases (Rags and Rheb) to the lysosomal surface66. When amino acid levels are low, mTORC1 is not translocated to the lysosomal surface66, thereby favoring catabolic processes such as autophagy67. We propose that amino acid scarcity might result from the upregulation of genes involved in the degradation of lysin, glycin, tyrosin, cystein, leucin, isoleucin, valin or tryptophan (Fig. 3, Data S1). This would decrease mTORC1 activity and, in turn, stimulates nutrient recycling via autophagy in AS worms.

Conversely, we hypothesize that in H worms, active mTORC1 interacts with the ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K), encoded by the rsks-1 gene which is also up in H worms68 (Fig. 3). This direct interaction, upon a cascade of phosphorylation events, would stimulate translation, and ultimately cell growth and proliferation68,69.

All in all, although it is currently unclear whether increased autophagy is beneficial or detrimental, under AS conditions, the upregulation of genes involved in self-digestion might play a protective role and foster recovery from starvation67, pathogens70 or from neuronal and muscular degeneration induced by oxygen deprivation35.

Lectins and mucins

Given that symbiont attachment may be mediated by Ca2+-dependent lectins71,72,73 and that, under anoxia, the symbiont appeared to proliferate more16, we expected nematode C-type lectins to be upregulated under this condition. Indeed, nine C-type lectin domain (CTLD)-containing proteins were upregulated in AS L. oneistus adults and only two (clec-78 and clec-78-like-2) were upregulated in the presence of oxygen (Fig. 4). In addition to CTLD-containing proteins, mucins, a class of glycoproteins with more than 50% of its mass attributable to O-glycans, were also upregulated in AS nematodes. Considering that mucin glycans are used by vertebrate gut commensals for attachment, as well as being a source of nutrients74, it is conceivable that their upregulation in anoxia (Fig. 4), together with that of CTLD-containing proteins, would foster symbiont attachment.

We hypothesize that overexpression of two classes of putative symbiont-binding molecules, lectins and mucins, under conditions favoring symbiont proliferation (i.e., AS conditions)16, may mediate bacterial coat reinforcement.

Apoptosis

Mitochondria play an important role in apoptosis induction54. Indeed, MPTP opening due to ROS (or the severe ATP decline imposed by the absence of oxygen) may cause cytochrome c release from mitochondria and this, in turn, triggers caspase activation7. We observed that transcripts encoding for sco-1, a gene needed for the synthesis and assembly of mitochondrial cytochrome c50, were more abundant in AS worms (Fig. 4). Further, we observed upregulation of Caspase-3 (ced-3) which belongs to a family of cysteine proteases involved in apoptosis and which is activated upon mitochondrial cytochrome c release into the cytosol54,75. Additional apoptosis-related genes that appeared to be upregulated in AS worms were: bec-1 (Fig. 3), a gene that promotes autophagy and fine-tunes the Ced-3-mediated apoptosis65; ttr-52, which mediates apoptotic cell recognition prior to engulfment76; a BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 1 (BAG1-regulator); a celldeath-related nuclease crn−277 and phagolysosome forming arl-878, and a tyrosine-protein kinase (abl-1) that modulates apoptotic engulfment pathways79.

Lipid catabolism

Genes involved in lipid metabolism were similarly expressed between the AS and H conditions (Fig. 2, Data S1). In accordance, lipidomes of nematodes incubated in the presence or absence of oxygen were not significantly different (Fig. S5, Supplemental material). However, in line with the overall upregulation of degradation pathways, we observed upregulation of genes involved in fatty acid beta-oxidation (kat-1)80, in lipid digestion (the lipase lipl-6; UniProtKB E2S7J2), and lipid degradation (a peripilin-2-like protein)81. Moreover, a gene that might be involved in oxidative stress tolerance (a stearic acid desaturase fat-7 regulating the first step of the fatty acid desaturation pathway82 was also upregulated in AS worms. Lipid degradation under anoxia might be a strategy to overcome starvation83.

Notably, we also observed an upregulation of two genes involved in phosphatidylcholine (PC) synthesis (pmt-1, pmt-2)84 (Fig. 5). Intriguingly, PC was more abundant in the anoxic symbiont16, although the latter cannot synthetize it. Thus, their upregulation in AS worms suggests worm-to-symbiont lipid transfer.

Figure 5
figure 5

Genes involved in immune response, development and nervous system were predominantly expressed in hypoxic (H) worms. Heatmap displaying genes upregulated in H relative to AS worms, upon 24 h-long incubations under one of the two conditions (1.5-fold change, FDR ≤ 0.05). Expression levels are displayed as mean-centered log2TPM value (transcripts per kilobase million). Genes are ordered by function in their respective metabolic pathways. For each process, the minority of genes that were upregulated in AS worms is shown in Data S1. Red denotes upregulation and blue downregulation. MN, mechanosensory neurons; Embr. body wall muscle posit.: Embryonic body wall muscle positioning; Put.; putative.

GABA- and glutamate-mediated neurotransmission

Upregulated genes related to GABA synthesis were unc-25, unc-104 and pdxk-1 (pyridoxal phosphate hexokinase)85,86,87 (Fig. 5, Data S1). Consistent with an expected increase in glutamate requirement as a direct GABA precursor88, we observed downregulation of two glutamine synthetases and a delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase (gln-3 and alh-13 respectively; Fig. 6)89,90, known to convert glutamate to glutamine or to proline, respectively. Furthermore, an mgl-2-like gene encoding for a glutamate receptor, which is activated in the presence of glutamate91, was up in AS worms. Note that, when oxygen is limited, glutamate may act as a neurotoxic amino acid92. Therefore, increased GABA biosynthesis might, beneficially, prevent its accumulation93.

Figure 6
figure 6

Genes involved in carbohydrate, lipid- and sulfur-metabolism, amino acids biosynthesis, and transport were predominantly expressed in hypoxic (H) worms. Heatmap displaying genes upregulated in H relative to AS worms, upon 24 h-long incubations under one of the two conditions (1.5-fold change, FDR ≤ 0.05). Expression levels are displayed as mean-centered log2TPM values (transcripts per kilobase million). Genes are ordered by function in their respective metabolic pathways. For each process, the minority of genes that were upregulated in AS worms is shown in Data S1. Red denotes upregulation, and blue downregulation. FA, fatty acids; PC phosphatidylcholine; PL, phospholipids; metab: metabolism; synth: synthesis; assim: assimilation, oxid: oxidation; Transp: transporters.

GABA-mediated neurotransmission has been documented for facultative anaerobic animals thriving in anoxic conditions92,94. Due to its inhibitory nature, it contributes to avoid membrane depolymerization94. Moreover, given that it relaxes muscles, the increment of GABA may impact the movement of the animal85. Therefore, upregulation of GABA-mediated neuronal activity might explain why L. oneistus did not form tight clusters  in anoxia (Supplemental Movie 3).

Dopamine-mediated neurotransmission

A gene encoding for the tyrosine hydroxylase Cat-2 (cat-2), which is needed for dopamine biosynthesis95 and two putative dopamine receptors (protein-D2-like and a G_PROTEIN_RECEP_F1_2 domain-containing protein (dop-5))96 were upregulated in AS worms. Moreover, a dat-1-like gene mediating dopamine reuptake into the presynaptic terminals was downregulated97 in AS worms (Fig. 5).

Calcium-binding and -sensing proteins

Finally, in AS worms several calcium-binding or -sensing proteins (e.g., ncs-2, cex-2, and a calbindin-like (CALB1 homolog); Fig. 5)98,99, as well as calcium transporters (cca-1; Transport category, Fig. 6)100 were upregulated. On the one hand, we hypothesize their involvement in the inhibitory neural signaling described above (for example, Ncs-2 mediates the cholinergic and GABAergic expression of C. elegans101. On the other, they may protect cells against the stress inflicted by anoxia, which involves calcium overload and consequent cellular acidification7.

Genes upregulated in hypoxic (H) nematodes

Innate immune pathways and effectors

Animals recognize and respond to microbes by means of immunoreceptors including Toll-like receptors, conserved from sponges to humans102. We identified almost all genes belonging to this pathway, including the one encoding for the NF-kB transcription factor. This came as a surprise given that, up to now, the NF-kB has not been identified in any other nematode103. Equally surprising was the fact that not only two Toll-like receptors (tol-1 and tol-1-like), but also genes encoding for antimicrobial proteins such as a peroxisome assembly factor involved in defense against Gram- (prx-11-like)104, a putatively antifungal endochitinase105 and bactericidal/permeability-increasing proteins (BPIs) were also more abundant in H worms. BPIs may bind LPS and perforate Gram- membranes and have been shown to play a symbiostatic role in other invertebrates106,107. However, it is unclear whether activation of the L. oneistus Toll pathway leads to the nuclear NF-kB switching on the expression of antimicrobial genes or whether, as shown in C. elegans, the Toll pathway mediates behavioral avoidance of pathogens108.

Overall, the apparent oxygen stimulation of a central innate immunity pathway and, directly or indirectly, of broad range antimicrobials could be adaptations to the fact that when crawling in superficial oxygenated sand, L. oneistus is not only exposed to predation by bigger animals, but also to pathogenic members of the bacterioplankton. Overexpression of broad-range antimicrobials in response to oxygen might therefore help L. oneistus to avoid colonization by potentially deleterious, fouling bacteria (e.g., vbrios, roseobacters and pseudoaltermonas/alteromonadales) when crawling close to the water column109 (M. Mussmann, personal communication).

Development

Although development-related genes were some of the most expressed under all conditions (Fig. 1), many were upregulated in H nematodes (Figs. 2 and 5). Among the development-related genes upregulated in H nematodes were those related to molting (e.g., nas-36, nas-38, chs-2, ptr-5, ptr-18, apl-1, myrf-1)110,111,112,113,114, germ line establishment (e.g., ccm-3, rsks-1)115,116, oogenesis/spermatogenesis (crt-1)117, embryonic development and yolk production (e.g., plt-1, mlc-5, crt-1, arrd-17, cpna-1, vit-6)118,119,120,121,122,123, and/or larval development (nmy-1, ifb-1)124,125, as well as male tail tip (cdt-1, plx-1, ver-3)126,127,128, and vulva morphogenesis (hda-1, unc-62)129,130 (Fig. 5). Morever, transcripts encoding for a number of proteases shown to be involved in C. elegans molting (e.g., nas-36, nas-38)110, development (e.g., teneurin-a-like)131, neuronal regrowth or locomotion (tep-1)132 and pharyngeal pumping (e.g., neprilysin nep-1)133 were also more abundant in H worms. Remarkably, vav-1, which besides being involved in male tail tip and vulva morphogenesis126 may also regulate the concentration of intracellular calcium134, was one of the few development-related genes to be downregulated in H nematodes (see previous section on Ca2+-binding proteins).

To sum up, and as expected, the host appears to exploit oxygen availability to undertake energetically costly processes, such as development and molting135.

Carbohydrate metabolism

If in AS nematodes, glycogen or starch appeared prominent carbon sources, H worms seemed to exploit trehalose and cellulose instead. Indeed, genes that degrade trehalose (tre-1)136, and cellulose (Ppa-cel-2)137 were upregulated in H worms, as well as a putative ADP-dependent glucokinase (C50D2.7) involved in glycolysis138. The use of this pathway was supported by the overexpression of four genes encoding for sugar transporters (Slc2-A1, C35A11, K08F9.1, F53H8.3)139,140, perhaps switched on by active mTOR (see above) (Fig. 6)69.

Additionally, L. oneistus appeared to exploit oxygen to synthesize complex polysaccharides, such as heparan sulfate (hst-1-like)141 and glycan (Gcnt3-like) (Fig. 6), as an ortholog of the N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase hst-1, related to heparin biosynthesis was also upregulated141.

Although glycolysis seems to generate ATP in both AS and H worms, it is not clear why the latter would prefer to respire cellulose or trehalose instead of starch. Given its role as a membrane stabilizer, we speculate that AS worms might prioritize the storage of trehalose over its degradation to preserve membrane integrity (Fig. 6)4,142. Of note, based on its genome draft, the symbiont may synthetize and transport trehalose, but it may not use it16. Therefore, we hypothesize symbiont-to-host transfer of trehalose under hypoxia. Consistently, the symbiont’s trehalose synthesis-related gene (otsB)16, and the host trehalase (tre-1; Fig. 6) were both upregulated under hypoxia and metabolomics could detect trehalose in both partners (Table S1). Metabolomics also detected sucrose in both the holobiont and the symbiont fraction (Table S1). Given that, based on transcriptomics and proteomics, the nematode can utilize sucrose but cannot synthesize it (Data S1), whereas the symbiont can16, we also hypothesize symbiont-to-host sucrose transfer.

Acetylcholine-mediated neurotransmission

Instead of upregulating genes involved in inhibitory (GABA- and dopamine-mediated) neurotransmission, hypoxic worms appeared to use excitatory acetylcholine-mediated neurotransmission as indicated by the upregulation of molo-1, acr-20, cup-4, lev-9, and sphingosine kinase sphk-1 that promotes its release143,144,145,146,147 (Fig. 5). On the one hand, acetylcholine-mediated neurotransmission might promote ROS detoxification in H worms148. On the other hand, its downregulation in AS worms may beneficially decrease calcium influx3.

Feeding, mating, mechanosensory behavior and axon guidance and fasciculation

Transcripts related to the neuronal regulation of energy-demanding activities such as feeding, mating, motion, as well as nervous system development were more abundant in H nematodes (Fig. 5, and Data S1). More precisely, upregulated genes were involved in pharyngeal pumping (nep-1, lat-2)133,149, male mating behavior and touch (pdfr-1, tbb-4, ebax-1)150,151, axon guidance and fasciculation (spon-1, igcm-1, ebax-1, tep-1)132,151,152,153, mechanosensory behavior (e.g., mec-12, delm-2)154,155. If we assume that L. oneistus mates in H conditions, genes involved in mechanosensory behavior may be upregulated for the male to find the female organ (vulva). Additionally, we also observed the upregulation of a gene encoding for a glutamate receptor (glr-7) possibly involved in feeding facilitation156.

Amino acid biosynthesis

Transcripts of genes involved in the synthesis of glutamine and proline (gln-3 and alh-13, respectively), aspartate (L-asparaginases)157 and S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) (sams-4)158 were all upregulated in H worms (Fig. 6), as well as one encoding for the ornithine decarboxylase odc-1 which is involved in biosynthesis of the polyamine putrescin, and is essential for cell proliferation and tissue growth159. Moreover, polyamines, with their high charge-to-mass ratio may protect against superoxide radicals, which, as mentioned, harm cell membranes and organelles, oxidize proteins, and damage DNA160.

Lipid biosynthesis

Genes upregulated in H worms mediate the biosynthesis of long chain fatty acids (acs-3, acs-14, elo-3 but not acs-5)138,161,162, sphingolipids (a sphingosine kinase-1 (sphk-1) and egl-8, which controls egg laying and pharyngeal pumping in C. elegans163. Notably, sphingolipids may be anti-apoptotic164 or result in acetylcholine release147.

On the other hand, ceramides, which have anti-proliferative properties and which may mediate resistance to severe oxygen deprivation165, appeared to be mainly synthesized in AS worms, as indicated by the upregulation of genes involved in ceramide biosynthesis (asm-3, ttm-5, Fig. 6)166.

Transport

As anticipated in the introduction, anoxia-tolerant animals switch off ATP-demanding processes such as ion pumping7. Indeed, transcripts encoding for proteins involved in cation channel activity (gtl-2, voltage gated H channel 1)167, sodium transport (delm-2-like)155, chloride transport (anoh-1, best-13, best-14)168,169,170, ABC transporters (wht-2, pgp-2, slcr-46.3, F23F12.3, hmit-1.3)171,172,173 and organic substance transport (F47E1.2, oct-2)174 were more abundant in H than AS worms (Fig. 6).

Sulfur metabolism

The mpst-7 gene, involved in organismal response to selenium and switched on in hypoxic C. elegans175, was upregulated in H nematodes (Fig. 6). Given that MPST-7 is thought to catalyze the conversion of sulfite and glutathione persulfide (GSSH) to thiosulfate and glutathione (GSH)176, hypoxia-experiencing L. oneistus might express this enzyme to recharge the cells with GSH and hence, help to cope with oxidative stress177. Also more abundant in H worms were transcripts encoding for the sulfatases 2 (sul-2)178 and a PAPS-producing pps-1 (3′-phospho-adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS), considered the universal sulfur donor)141, as well as for the chaperones pdi-6 and protein-disulfide-isomerase-A5-like which require oxygen to mediate correct disulfide bond formation in protein folding6,179 (Fig. 6). Conversely, a putative sulfide-producing enzyme (mpst-1) which protects C. elegans from mitochondrial damage180 was upregulated in AS nematodes, albeit together with two genes encoding for enzymes involved in its detoxification, a persulfide dioxygenase (ethe-1) and a cysteine dioxygenase (cdo-1)179. The first detoxifies sulfide by producing glutathione, while the latter catalyzes taurine synthesis via cysteine degradation. Of note, sulfide detoxification via taurine accumulation is a common strategy in chemosynthetic animals (reviewed in181).

All in all, L. oneistus appeared to limit excess accumulation of free sulfide in anoxia and to free sulfate when oxygen was available.

Conclusions

Overall, and irrespective of the conditions it was subjected to, L. oneistus mostly expressed genes involved in degradation processes, energy generation, stress response and immune defense. Astonishingly, L. oneistus did not enter suspended animation when subjected to anoxic sulfidic conditions for days. We hypothesize that in the absence of oxygen, ATP production is supported by symbiont-derived trehalose and cellulose catabolism, and by rewiring the ETC in such way as to use RQ as electron carrier, and fumarate as electron acceptor. Moreover, the nematode activates several degradation pathways (e.g., UPS, autophagy, and apoptosis) to gain nutrients from anoxia-damaged proteins and mitochondria. Further, AS worms also upregulated genes encoding for ribosomal proteins and putative symbiont-binding proteins (lectins). Finally, as proposed for other anoxia-tolerant animals, the worm seems to upregulate its antioxidant capacity in anticipation of reoxygenation. When in hypoxic conditions (Fig. 7, left), instead, we speculate that the worm uses starch for energy generation to engage in costly developmental processes such as molting, feeding, and mating, likely relying on excitatory neurotransmitters (e.g., acetylcholine), and it upregulates the Toll immune pathway and, directly or indirectly, the synthesis of broad range antimicrobials (e.g., fungicides, BPIs).

Figure 7
figure 7

Schematic representation of Laxus oneistus physiology in anoxic or hypoxic  conditions. In anoxic sulfidic  conditions (left), L. oneistus does not enter suspended animation. Instead, it upregulates the expression of genes mediating inhibitory neurotransmission, involved in symbiosis establishment (e.g., lectins, mucins) and in ribosome biogenesis. Metabolism may be supported by the degradation of starch and by rewiring the electron transfer chain: rhodoquinone (RQ) is used as electron carrier and fumarate as electron acceptor. Moreover, the worm activates degradation pathways (e.g., ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), autophagy, and apoptosis) and may anticipate reoxygenation by upregulating superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GP). In hypoxic  conditions (right), instead, L. oneistus appears to use trehalose and cellulose for energy generation, while engaging in costly processes such as development, molting, feeding, and mating. Genes involved in excitatory neurotransmission are also upregulated, together with Toll-like receptors and immune effectors (e.g., fungicides, BPIs).

When looking at the Laxus-Thiosymbion symbiosis in light of what was recently published16, we could identify two signs of inter-partner metabolic dependence: under anoxia, worms might transfer lipids to their symbionts, and under hypoxia, the symbionts might transfer trehalose and sucrose to their hosts.

Furthermore, we may conclude that, wherever in the sand the consortium is, one of the two partners is bound to be stressed: in anoxia, the symbiont appears to proliferate more, while its animal host engages in degradation of damaged proteins and mitochondria and in detoxification. In the presence of oxygen, the situation is inverted: the symbiont seems massively stressed, while the host can afford energy-costly biosynthetic processes to develop and reproduce (Fig. 7). It is therefore fascinating that, in spite of the dramatically different needs a bacterium and animal must have, the Laxus-Thiosymbion symbiosis evolved.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Laxus oneistus individuals were collected on multiple field trips (2016–2019) with cores of 60 cm length and 60 mm diameter (UWITEC, Mondsee, Austria) down to a depth of approximately 1 m depth in the sand bars off the Smithsonian Field Station, Carrie Bow Cay in Belize (16°48′11.01″N, 88°4′54.42″W). The collection of the nematodes, the incubations set up for RNA sequencing, lipidomics, proteomics and metabolomics, as well as the RNA extraction, and library preparation are in detailed described in16. Importantly, the nematodes had a bright white appearance and replicate incubations were started simultaneously. Note that the Supplemental material describes the metabolomics and sequencing data of Olavius algarvensis, as well as changes from16 in the lipidomics and proteomics pipelines.

Host transcriptome de novo assembly

In preparation for the assembly, reads from each sample were first mapped to the symbiont as described before16, and remaining rRNA reads from all domains of life were removed from unmapped reads using sortmerna v2.1 in combination with the SSURef_NR99_119_SILVA_14_07_14 and LSURef_119_SILVA_15_07_14 databases. Further, exact duplicate reads were removed using PRINSEQ lite’s derep option. Read files free of symbiont reads, rRNA reads and exact duplicates were used as input for transcriptome sub-assemblies via Trinity v2.6.6 with the strand-specific option (--SS_lib_type F)182. Two sub-assemblies differing in the number and type of input read files were performed: (1) 9 input read files including biological triplicates from 3 incubation conditions (O, H, A) and (2) 4 input read files including a single replicate from 4 incubation conditions (O, H, A and hyper-O). Hyper-O refers to an incubation in which air was pumped directly into the exetainers for the entire incubation period to supersaturate the seawater (300% O2). However, as this incubation condition yielded an incongruous transcriptional response by the symbiont (data not shown), these read data were only used to extend the host transcriptome’s coding repertoire. The qualities of both sub-assemblies were assessed as described below.

We then performed an intra-assembly clustering step as described in183, during which identical transcripts were removed from the sub-assemblies using CD-HIT-EST184. To further reduce redundant transcripts, only the longest isoform for each ‘gene’ identified by Trinity was kept using Trinity’s get_longest_isoform_seq_per_trinity_gene.pl utility. The remaining transcripts of each sub-assembly were then concatenated to produce a merged transcriptome assembly. The final assembly was created by applying another sequence clustering using CD-HIT-EST to avoid inter-assembly redundancy. Here, the identity parameter of 80% (-c 0.8) combined with a minimal coverage ratio of the shorter sequence of 80% (-aS 0.8) and minimal coverage ratio of the longest sequence of 0.005% (-aL 0.005) yielded the best-performing assembly in terms of number of transcripts (162,455) and contiguity (N50 value of 770) (data not shown).

Assembly completeness was assessed by estimating completeness via BUSCO nematode single-copy orthologs (Simão et al. 2015). Importantly, the merged assembly yielded a higher BUSCO-based completeness compared with the two sub-assemblies; 79.2% of the BUSCO nematode single-copy orthologs were found to be present and complete in the final assembly (636 single-copy; 142 duplicated), whereas assembly (1) scored 77.8% (233 single-copy; 531 duplicated) and assembly (2) was 76.2% complete (314 single-copy; 434 duplicated). Further, assembled transcripts were filtered based on taxonomic classification. Transcripts were matched against the RefSeq protein database using blastx (E-value 1E−3), and the output was then used as input for taxonomic assignment via MEGAN v5185. Only transcripts classified as belonging to ‘Eukarya’ were kept (MEGAN parameters: Min Score: 50, Max Expected: 1E-2, Top Percent: 2), which reduced the number of putative L. oneistus transcripts to 30,562. Assembled transcripts were also functionally annotated using Trinotate186. Briefly, predicted protein coding regions were extracted using TransDecoder (https://github.com/TransDecoder), both transcripts and predicted protein sequences were searched for protein homology via blastx and blastp, respectively, and predicted protein sequences were annotated for protein domains (hmmscan), signal peptides (signalP) and transmembrane domains (TMHMM). 85,859 transcripts exhibited at least one functional annotation. Finally, only taxonomy-filtered transcripts with at least one functional annotation were kept, thereby further reducing the number of putative host transcripts to 27,984, with 22,072 thereof predicted to contain protein coding regions. BUSCO-based completeness for this filtered host transcriptome assembly was 78.8% (635 single-copy; 139 duplicated).

Gene expression analysis

Raw sequencing reads quality assessment and preprocessing of data was followed as described in16. Trimmed reads were mapped to the de novo transcriptome assembly and transcript abundance was estimated using RSEM v1.3.1187 in combination with bowtie2 with default settings except for the application of strandedness (--strandedness forward). Read counts per transcript were used for differential expression analysis, and TPM (transcripts per kilobase million) values were transformed to log2TPMs as described in16.

Gene and differential expression analyses were conducted using R and the Bioconductor package edgeR v3.28.1188,189, and as shown in16. Here, we only describe the modifications that were made to the pipeline. Genes were considered expressed if at least ten reads in at least three replicates of one of the four conditions could be assigned. Excluding the replicates of the oxic condition, we found 74.9% of all predicted nematode protein-encoding genes to be expressed (16,526 genes out of 22,072). Log2TPM were used to assess sample similarities via multidimensional scaling based on Euclidean distances (R Stats package)189 (Fig. S1B), and the average of replicate log2TPM values per expressed gene and condition was used to estimate expression strength. Median gene expression of entire metabolic processes and pathways per condition was determined from average log2TPM values.

Expression of genes was considered significantly different if their expression changed 1.5-fold between two treatments with a false-discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05190. Throughout the paper, all genes meeting these thresholds are either termed differentially expressed or up- or downregulated. For the differential expression analyses between the AS, H and A conditions see Data S1. Heatmaps show mean-centered log2TPM expression values to highlight gene expression change.

All predicted L. oneistus proteins were automatically annotated using eggNOG-mapper v2191 against eggNOG 5.0192 using diamond v2.0.4193. All genes that are shown and involved in a particular process were manually curated by blasting (blastp) them against both the nr database194 and the WormBase (https://wormbase.org/tools/blast_blat)195. The Spearman’s rank correlation was carried out with per-gene averaged log2TPM and orgNSAF% values over the oxic and anoxic incubations for the transcriptome and proteome, respectively, in R189.