Abstract
We investigate the interplay of magnetization and lattice vibrations in rareearth orthoferrites RFeO_{3}, with a specific focus on nonsymmetrybreaking anomalies. To do so, we study the magnetization, magnon excitations and lattice dynamics as a function of temperature in NdFeO_{3}, TbFeO_{3}, EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}. The magnetization shows distinct temperature anomalous behavior for all investigated rareearth orthoferrites, even in the compounds with no phase transitions occurring at those temperatures. Through spin–phonon coupling, these magnetic changes are mirrored by the FeO_{6} rotation mode for all the studied RFeO_{3}, revealing a common magnetostructural effect associated with the octahedra rotations. The R^{3+} oscillation modes evidence a Fe^{3+}/R^{3+} spins crosstalk for the NdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3} cases. Our work sheds light into the common magnetostructural coupling in rareearth orthoferrites, and the important role of magnetic anisotropy and spin–orbit coupling strength of the R–Fe interactions on the spinreorientation transition at high temperatures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Rareearth orthoferrites RFeO_{3} (R = rareearth trivalent cation), despite being studied for decades^{1,2,3,4,5,6}, attracted recent scientific interest thanks to their intriguing magnetic properties, including spinreorientation transitions and newfound magnetically induced ferroelectricity^{7,8,9,10,11,12}.
The Fe^{3+} spins order at T_{N} between 623 and 740 K, with increasing temperature for increasing rareearth cation size^{5,13}. The ordering is triggered by the condensation of the magnetic order parameter with symmetry mΓ_{4}^{+}. This gives rise to an A_{x}F_{y}G_{z}type ordering of the Fe^{3+} spin sublattice (in Bertaut notation)^{14} with the magnetic space group Pn’ma’. The primary magnetic order is of the antiferromagnetic Gtype. The canted spin structure leads to a netmagnetization along the baxis^{5,13}. The R^{3+} spinsublattice orders below 10 K. Like the Fe^{3+} spinsublattice, a Gtype order dominates the magnetic structure of the R^{3+} spinsublattice. The interaction of both Gtype lattices can give rise to improper ferroelectricity, as for instance in GdFeO_{3} below 3 K^{9,12,15,16}.
Between T_{N} and the temperature of R^{3+} spin ordering, the magnetic landscape is dominated by the crosstalk of the ordered iron sublattice and the paramagnetic rareearth spins. On the one hand, rareearth ions with a significant magnetocrystalline anisotropy trigger a spin reorientation transition of the magnetic iron sublattice (e.g. R = Nd, Sm, Er and Tb)^{5}. On the other hand, the iron sublattice induces a net magnetization of the rareearth sublattice. It was suggested that parallel or antiparallel alignment of the R^{3+} spin sublattice with respect to the Fe^{3+} one is steered by the octahedron tilt system, thus linking the crystal structure and magnetism^{17}.
In this intermediate regime, temperaturedependent magnetic anomalies were reported. For instance, the M(T) curves of GdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3} exhibit slike anomalies at around 210 and 250 K, respectively^{1,6}. However, their origins and link to the crystal structure and lattice vibrations remain still unclear.
Our present work is motivated by the need to shed light on these aspects aiming for a deeper understanding of the magnetic behavior in RFeO_{3}. Towards this objective, we scrutinize the magnetization, and Ramanactive magnons and phonons across a large temperature range of a series of RFeO_{3}: NdFeO_{3}, TbFeO_{3}, EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}. We selected these four compounds for their different rareearth magnetic properties and interplay between magnetic and lattice degrees of freedom, to allow the access to different magnetic interactions between the Fe^{3+} and the R^{3+} spins. For instance, both NdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3} exhibit spinreorientation transitions, yet at different temperatures, and hence a significant magnetocrystalline anisotropy. On the other hand, Gd^{3+} ions present no magnetocrystalline anisotropy of spin–orbit origin (i.e. zero orbital moment, with a large spin moment) and Eu^{3+} has no magnetic moment. Therefore, this set of compounds is representative for the family of orthoferrites in general. From the comprehensive study of the temperature dependence of the magnetization and magnon wavenumbers, different types of magnetic anomalies are ascertained, which are not associated with nonsymmetrybreaking. These magnetic changes are mirrored in the FeO_{6}rotation and Roscillation modes, via spin–phonon coupling. Our experimental results show a common magnetostructural effect occurring in these RFeO_{3} associated with the FeO_{6} octahedra rotations, and a crosstalking between Fe^{3+} spins and the R^{3+} spins for the NdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3} cases that exposes the importance of magnetic anisotropy and spin–orbit coupling in triggering the spinreorientation transition.
Methods
Highquality ceramic pellets of RFeO_{3} (R = Nd, Eu, Gd and Tb) were processed through the urea sol–gel combustion method, sintered at 1350 °C for 60 h, quenched to room temperature. Xray powder diffraction patterns were recorded at ambient conditions using an X’Pert Pro PANalytical diffractometer with a copper anode (1.54184 Å) in Bragg–Brentano geometry and an ultrafast X’Celerator detector with a secondary monochromator, from 10° to 95° in 2θ. Rietveld refinements of the diffraction patterns confirm the correct Pnma space group (see Fig. S1 of Supplemental Material). No secondary phases were detected, except in NdFeO_{3} ceramics, which show an amount of 6.8% of Nd_{2}O_{3}.
Lowfield DC induced specific magnetization measurements were carried out using commercial superconducting quantum interference SQUID magnetometer. The magnetization was measured after zerofield (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) from 5 to 380 K under an applied magnetic field of 40 Oe, with a resolution of 1 × 10^{–7} emu.
Raman spectra were recorded using a Jobin–Yvon T64000 spectrometer and a Renishaw inVia Qontor with 514.5 nm and 532 nm linearly polarized excitation lines of Ar^{+} and diodepumped lasers, respectively. The spectral ranges cover 100 to 800 cm^{−1} and − 600 to 600 cm^{−1}. Measurements were performed at fixed temperatures from 10 to 875 K using either a closedcycle helium cryostat or a THMS600 Linkam Stage. The effect of the laser power on the sample was previously studied and it was limited below 5 mW to prevent sample heating. The best fits of a sum of damped oscillators to the measured Raman spectra allow us to determine the wavenumbers of the phonon and magnon modes^{18}.
Experimental result s and discussion
Magnetic properties and interactions
In the first step of our study, we investigate the temperature dependence of the magnetization for NdFeO_{3} (FC), TbFeO_{3}, EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3} (ZFC), as displayed in Fig. 1. The vertical dashed arrows mark the temperatures of anomalies that will be important for the following sections of this work. Remarkably, the magnetization curves have little in common and the magnetization signals are dramatically different for different rareearths. This motivates the following detailed analysis.
NdFeO_{3}. The magnetization of NdFeO_{3} (Fig. 1a) is temperature independent between 350 and 175 K. With the start of the spin reorientation from A_{x}F_{y}G_{z} (Pn′ma′) to C_{x}G_{y}F_{z}type order (Pn′m′a) at 170 K, M(T) increases monotonously until a small dent at 110 K marks the end of the spin reorientation regime^{19}. Down to 70 K, M(T) further increases. Hereafter, the magnetization decreases due to the gradual antiparallel ordering of the Nd^{3+} spins in the exchange field of the Fe^{3+} spins^{7}. At 9 K, the magnetic contributions of the Nd^{3+} and Fe^{3+} spins compensate and the magnetization reverses for lower temperatures. The M(T) profile of the ceramic sample qualitatively agrees with the vector sum of the baxis and caxis components of the magnetization for single crystal measurements taken from Ref.^{7} (see inset of Fig. 1a).
TbFeO_{3}. In Fig. 1b, M(T) of TbFeO_{3} increases with decreasing temperature with changes in slope for several temperature intervals. At 280 K and at 150 K, the slope of M(T) increases slightly (see Fig. S2 of Supplemental Material for a detailed view). These features were reported earlier, however, remain to be understood^{6}. Below 20 K, the slope of M(T) becomes steeper with a maximum at 10 K. The sudden increase in slope at 20 K marks the onset of the spinreorientation transition, where the net magnetic moment of the Fe^{3+} spins rotates from the b to the caxis. In addition, the Tb^{3+} spins order in the exchange field of the Fe^{3+} spins below 10 K, reflected by the saturation of M(T) in good agreement with the literature^{10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20}.
EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3} do not show a spinreorientation transition^{13}. Nevertheless, the M(T) curve of both materials is characterized by anomalies with clear changes in slope. The magnetization of EuFeO_{3} increases as the temperature decreases toward its maximum at 30 K, presenting a broad anomaly around 200 K. Also a broad maximum of M(T) around 200 K was reported in the literature for EuFeO_{3}, with the magnetization decreasing towards 0 K^{21}. The temperature dependence of the magnetization of GdFeO_{3} is more complex, exhibiting strong variations below 100 K. For T < 36 K, the magnetization increases due to the paramagnetic response of the Gd^{3+} sublattice^{22}. Qualitatively, the M(T) curve of GdFeO_{3} agrees with the results reported in the literature^{1,21}. The existence of magnetic changes occurring at 260 K is also ascertained by the anomalous temperature dependence of the coercive field at 200 K^{23}.
Among the four studied compounds and in the 5 to 350 K range, TbFeO_{3} presents the highest maximum magnetization value (around 500 emu/mol), while EuFeO_{3} presents the smallest one (around 0.5 emu/mol, 3 orders of magnitude smaller than TbFeO_{3}). GdFeO_{3} and NdFeO_{3} are in between, with GdFeO_{3} presenting a larger magnetization below 150 K. Due to the van Vleck character of Eu^{3+}, its spins are expected to contribute little to the total magnetization contrary to the other rareearth cations^{24}. Thus, the magnetization of EuFeO_{3} arises dominantly from the Fe^{3+} spin sublattice, due to the canting of the Fe^{3+} spins, which is found in literature to be 8.0 mrad^{4}. Despite the similar canting angles of NdFeO_{3}, GdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3}, these compounds show a substantially larger magnetization than EuFeO_{3}^{4}. Therefore, we conclude that the contribution of the Nd^{3+}, Gd^{3+}, and Tb^{3+} paramagnetic momenta or their interaction with Fe^{3+} add a significant contribution for the overall magnetization. In the case of TbFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}, the R^{3+} spins align parallelly to the net magnetization of the Fe^{3+} spins, leading to an increase of the overall magnetization. The Nd^{3+} spins, in turn, align antiparallelly to the Fe^{3+} spins. Hence, the magnetization decreases and even reverses at low temperatures.
Figure 2 summarizes the temperatures where discernable magnetic anomalies are observed for each RFeO_{3}. Apart from the spinreorientations of NdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3}, these anomalies below T_{N} do not correspond to any critical phenomena or phase transitions. The observed anomalies in the M(T) curves, which are between 3 and 4 orders of magnitude larger than the measurement resolution, indicate complex magnetic interactions in the investigated orthoferrites, triggered by the interaction between Fe^{3+} and R^{3+} spins, which we analyze in the following.
In the molecular field approximation, we can express the net magnetization resulting from the interaction of the order Fe^{3+} sublattice and the paramagnetic R^{3+} spins as follows^{2}:
where \(\alpha\) is the spin canting angle, σ(T) the Fe^{3+} sublattice moment, \(\langle d\rangle\) the mean R–Fe interaction parameter and \(t=T/{T}_{N}\). The plot of \(F\left(t\right)=M\left(T\right)t/H\) versus \(T\) is represented by the blue curves (right axes) of Fig. 1. Here, \(H\propto \sigma (T)/\sigma (0)\) is the effective magnetic field, calculated from Mössbauer data^{4}, and \(\sigma (0)\) is the Fe^{3+} sublattice magnetic moment at 0 K. According to the molecular field approximation, the changes of the slope of \(F\left(t\right)\), thus of \(2\alpha \sigma (0)/{T}_{N}\), evidence changes of net magnetization of the iron sublattice^{2}. From the intercept with \(t=0\), we calculate \(\langle d\rangle\) associated with the magnetic interaction strength between R^{3+} and Fe^{3+} spins^{2}.
NdFeO_{3} presents two linear regimes above and below the spin reorientation transition. The slope in the 10 to 60 K range is about 59% steeper than above the spin reorientation. We interpret this as a consequence of the emergent magnetic interaction of Nd^{3+} and Fe^{3+} spins below the spin reorientation regime.
TbFeO_{3} also exhibits two linear regimes in the 20 to 80 K and 250 to 350 K in \(F\left(t\right)\), respectively, with a slope decrease of about 70% as temperature increases, in agreement with the literature^{20}. The deviation below 260 K from the high temperature linear regime can be better observed in the residuals plot obtained from subtraction of the linear fit to the data, shown Fig. S2 of the Supplemental Material.
EuFeO_{3} exhibits two different linear temperature dependences from 5 to 150 K, and 230 to 350 K, respectively, with only a minor slope change, of the order of 4%. This is in agreement with small variation of magnetization with temperature^{20}.
GdFeO_{3}, displays the most complex \(F\left(t\right)\) behavior, with linear relations from 10 to 35 K, 100 to 150 K and 250 to 300 K and a local maximum at 200 K. Such a behavior suggests that the model does not fully reproduce the magnetic properties of GdFeO_{3} above 150 K, but this shall not invalidate the calculation of the \(\langle d\rangle\) value at very low temperatures.
The calculated \(\langle d\rangle\) values are presented in Table 1. For the fitting, the linear regime at low temperatures (see Table 1) was used, where the R–Fe magnetic interaction is strongest. The \(\langle d\rangle\) values are about one order of magnitude smaller than those reported by Treves^{2}, which were calculated from data available only above 100 K. For comparison with Treves, we have analyzed our data in the same temperature range, then leading to similar values. The difference is thus due to the analyzed temperature regime, and we consider that our fittings to the lower temperature range more correctly account the underlying physics.
For NdFeO_{3}, \(\langle d\rangle\) is negative. This indicates antiferromagnetic interaction between Nd^{3+} and Fe^{3+} spins, in good agreement with the Nd^{3+} spin ordering antiparallel to the Fe^{3+} spins. For GdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3}, \(\langle d\rangle\) is positive. This leads to a parallel alignment of Tb^{3+}/Gd^{3+} and Fe^{3+} spins and explains the increase in overall magnetization and the absence of a compensation temperature. We note, that these values are in agreement with the theoretical ones for the orientation of the rareearth sublattice magnetization with respect to the Fe^{3+} spins sublattice^{17}. Among the studied compounds, the mean interaction coupling parameter between Eu^{3+} and Fe^{3+} cations has the smallest absolute value. This indicates a comparably small interaction between both ions and can be understood by the small magnetic momentum of the Eu^{3+} cations.
It is worth to stress that, although the values of \(\langle d\rangle\) are similar for both GdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3}, the anisotropy of TbFeO_{3} is larger, such that TbFeO_{3} shows a spinreorientation transition whereas GdFeO_{3} does not. NdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3} show a similar R–Fe interaction parameter \(\langle d\rangle\), yet of different sign. Also, the spin reorientation temperatures differ significantly for both materials. These behaviors underline the complexity of magnetic interactions in rareearth orthoferrites.
Magnon excitations
We now investigate the magnetic changes through a temperaturedependent analysis of collective spin excitations of the Fe^{3+} spin lattice, socalled magnons. Magnons are known to be an excellent probe of subtle magnetic changes, such as the beforehand reported anomalies in RFeO_{3} with R = Y, Sm, Dy, Ho, Tm, Er and Tb^{5,26,27,28}.
Figure 3 shows the unpolarized Stokes and antiStokes Raman spectra of NdFeO_{3}, TbFeO_{3}, EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3} recorded at 80 and 300 K. Two magnon modes are observed, in good agreement with earlier experiments on other RFeO_{3}^{26,27,29}. According to literature, the lower wavenumber mode (M1) is assigned to the ferromagnetic magnon and the higher wavenumber mode (M2) to the antiferromagnetic magnon of the Fe^{3+} spinsublattice^{26,27}.
Figure 4a–h show the temperature dependence of the wavenumber of the M1 and M2 magnons of NdFeO_{3}, TbFeO_{3}, EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}, respectively, from 80 to 450 K. For completion, we also show in Fig. 4b,f the available data from the literature between 6 and 300 K for TbFeO_{3}. We begin by discussing NdFeO_{3}, shown in Fig. 4a,e, which shows a particularly interesting behavior with several regimes. Between 500 and 240 K, the wavenumber of the magnon M1 increases monotonously with decreasing temperature. From 240 to 100 K, the magnon M1 softens by 1.5 cm^{−1}. In addition, cusplike anomalies mark the limits of the spinreorientation temperature range (170–110 K). Below 100 K, the wavenumber of magnon M1 increases upon further cooling. Following the interpretation given for TbFeO_{3} and SmFeO_{3}^{26,27}, this result is associated with the alignment of the Nd^{3+} spins in the exchange field of the Fe^{3+} spin sublattice. Qualitatively, our temperature dependence of M1 wavenumber for NdFeO_{3} is in good agreement with the one observed through THz spectroscopy data^{30,31}. Magnon M2 hardens on cooling down to 240 K. At the high temperature limit of the spinreorientation a cusplike anomaly occurs and, on further cooling down to 78 K, magnon M2 slightly softens.
The temperature dependence of the M1 and M2 magnons wavenumber of TbFeO_{3} here reported (Fig. 4b,f closed symbols) are in good agreement with the already reported data (open symbols), with only the exception of the points between 80 and 100 K, for the case of M1^{27}. The wavenumber of both magnons increases monotonously as the temperature decreases. A clear change of slope of the temperature dependence of M1 is observed at around 150 K, in the temperature interval for which the change of slope of the \(F(t)\) function is observed (cf. Fig. 1b). The wavenumber of the magnon M2 experiences a sudden increase below 20 K, associated with the spin reorientation transition.
The wavenumber of both magnons of EuFeO_{3}, shown in Fig. 4c,g, increases as temperature decreases and no clear anomalous temperature dependence is found down to 80 K. The temperature dependence of the magnon wavenumbers of GdFeO_{3} are depicted in Fig. 4d,h. The wavenumber of the magnon M2 increases monotonously as temperature decreases towards 80 K, without any hint of anomalous behavior. However, the wavenumber of M1 increases as temperature decreases from 450 K down to 350 K, then it becomes temperature independent down to 200 K, and on further cooling, the wavenumber of magnon M1 increases linearly down to 100 K.
Among the studied compounds, the magnon wavenumbers of TbFeO_{3} exhibit the largest temperature variation, reaching more than 6 cm^{−1} for M1, while the smallest variations are found in EuFeO_{3} and are less than 1 cm^{−1} for M1 and 4 cm^{−1} for the M2 mode, in agreement with their respective largest and smallest magnetization changes (cf. Fig. 1). We can conclude that the anomalies identified in the magnetization curves appear to affect only the M1 mode (seen in TbFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}), while they apparently do not affect the M2 mode, which only presents anomalies at the spinreorientations (seen in NdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3}). Having in mind the ferromagnetic origin of the M1 magnons, this result points out that the observed magnetic anomalies in TbFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3} might be associated with changes of the ferromagnetic interactions.
Comparing the temperature behavior of the magnons wavenumber in NdFeO_{3} to other compounds with spinreorientation, we conclude that M1 exhibits a similar incomplete softening to those reported for ErFeO_{3}, TmFeO_{3} and SmFeO_{3}, which has been attributed to the coupling between the Fe^{3+} spins and the R^{3+} electronic states^{30,31,32,33}. In this regard, it seems that M1 has a common temperature dependence for all RFeO_{3} with spinreorientation. In contrast, the published results do not exhibit the softening of M2 neither any anomalies seen at the spinreorientation limits in both magnons wavenumber^{26,27}, which deserves further more detailed studies of spin excitations across the spinreorientations of these compounds.
Spin–phonon coupling
In the next step, we investigate the response of the phonon spectra as a function of temperature. The optical phonons of the RFeO_{3} have A_{g}, B_{1g}, B_{2g} and B_{3g} symmetries—the mode assignment is available in the literature^{34}. Figures 5a–d show unpolarized Raman spectra in the range from 100 to 580 cm^{−1}, for NdFeO_{3}, TbFeO_{3}, EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}, respectively, measured at fixed temperatures between 10 and 800 K. The roomtemperature Raman signature agrees with literature data^{34}. With decreasing temperature, the phonon bands sharpen and shift at different rates. As a consequence, some bands become better resolved and visible.
From the study of the temperature evolution of each observed mode, we chose to present and discuss in more detail two modes, which present the most relevant spin–phonon coupling: the [010]_{pc} inphase FeO_{6} octahedra rotation mode (Fig. 6a–d), and of the outofphase Roscillations modes along the x and zaxes (Fig. 7a–d). As the magnetic superexchanges in the Fe^{3+} spin sublattice is tightly associated with the Fe–O–Fe bond angle, the FeO_{6} rotation modes are highly sensitive to magnetic changes of the Fe^{3+} spin sublattice. Moreover, since the Roscillation modes are sensitive to the environment around the R^{3+} cations, we use them as probes of the interaction R–Fe spins interaction. To study the spin–phonon coupling, the phonon wavenumber is compared to the expected anharmonic temperature behavior, obtained from the best fit to the experimental data, above 200 K (for NdFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}) and 300 K (for TbFeO_{3} and EuFeO_{3}), of the equation^{35}
where ω_{0}, C and D are fitting parameters and k_{B} is the Boltzmann constant. These fits are given as solid lines in Figs. 6 and 7. It is at first sight surprising that no anomalous temperature dependence is observed at T_{N} (see Fig. S3 of Supplemental Material), also not found for YFeO_{3}^{36}.
In the [010]_{pc} inphase FeO_{6} octahedra rotation mode, the spinreorientation for NdFeO_{3} reveals itself through anomalies in the temperature dependence of this mode observed in Fig. 6a. Its temperature dependence presents a deviation to higher wavenumbers below 170 K. From 150 to 30 K, the wavenumber linearly increases with decreasing temperature. No anomalous temperature dependence at the low temperature limit of the spinreorientation transition is observed. Below 20 K, a sudden increase of the wavenumber is observed on approaching the compensation temperature of NdFeO_{3} at 8 K. In TbFeO_{3} (Fig. 6b), a strong deviation to higher wavenumbers of the octahedra rotation mode occurs below 300 K. In the case of EuFeO_{3} (Fig. 6c), a downshift takes place below 250 K, while for GdFeO_{3} (Fig. 6d), an upshift is observed below 200 K.
For all the studied compounds, the anomalous temperature dependence of the [010]_{pc} inphase FeO_{6} octahedra rotation mode wavenumber is observed at the same temperature where the corresponding M(T) curves exhibit anomalies (marked by the dashed lines and arrows in Fig. 6a–d). This implies the specific role of this mode in the spin–phonon coupling of the studied compounds, even at the spinreorientation of NdFeO_{3}. The shifts ranging from 1 to 3 cm^{−1}, with the expected magnitude for spin–phonon coupling effects^{37,38,39,40}, would correspond to octahedra rotation changes, estimated to be between 0.05° and 0.15°, arising from the magnetostructural coupling. The Raman mode wavenumber shift are positive, except for EuFeO_{3}. This is associated with the overall different magnetization response of EuFeO_{3} in comparison to the other compounds as shown in Fig. 1, due to the lack of R–Fe interactions, which leads to a different spin–phonon interaction. This assumption is actually corroborated by the substantially smaller magnitude of the mean interaction parameter \(\langle d\rangle\) of Eu–Fe sublattices relatively to the remaining compounds, as it can be straight confirmed from Table 1.
We now aim at understanding the crosstalk of the magnetic R–Fe interaction with the phonon lattice, as recently observed in SmFeO_{3}^{40}. To do so, we address the outofphase Roscillations modes, shown in Fig. 7a–d. In general, three different temperature behaviors of these modes are observed.
Concerning the two Ndoscillation modes (Fig. 7a), their wavenumbers follow the anharmonic temperature law down to 110 K, below which a small downshift occurs. On further cooling, they both increases linearly, with a maximum downshift of around 0.5 cm^{−1} at 10 K. Although small, this points out for a coupling between the spin structure and the phonons involving the Nd^{3+} cations.
Figure 7b shows the temperature dependence of the wavenumber of the two Tboscillation modes. Below 280 K/150 K, the wavenumber of the Tb(z)/Tb(x) oscillation mode shows a notable upshift/downshift, with a maximum magnitude of 4 cm^{−1}. Each mode starts its deviation at a temperature wherein an anomaly was found in the M(T) curve, evidencing the interaction of the ordered Fe^{3+} spins with the paramagnetic Tb^{3+} spins. Moreover, the different temperature of deviation and direction of the Tboscillation modes wavenumber along each crystallographic axis are evidence of a strong magnetic anisotropy which affects the elastic interactions involving the Tb^{3+} cations.
Finally, for EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}, the wavenumber of both R(z) and R(x)oscillation modes follow the expected anharmonic temperature dependence in the investigated range, as shown in Fig. 7c,d, respectively. The absence of a coupling between spins and the Roscillation modes can be understood by the properties of the Eu^{3+} and Gd^{3+} cations. The van Vleck character of Eu^{3+} cation leads to a small magnitude of the mean interaction parameter \(\langle d\rangle\) regarding the magnetic Eu^{3+}–Fe^{3+} interactions^{24}, which are therefore small. On other hand, Gd^{3+} does not exhibit magnetocrystalline anisotropy and, as it has no orbital angular momentum, the spin–orbit interaction is negligibly small. Consequently, a negligible coupling between Gd^{3+} spin orientation changes and cationic oscillations are expected.
To get further information regarding the coupling between phonons and spins, we investigate the quantitative correlation between the measured magnetization and the contribution Δω = ω_{ph}(T) − ω_{phanhar}(T) to the phonon wavenumber due to changes in the spin structure.
The relation between Δω and the measured magnetization is shown in Fig. 8a–d (see Fig. S4 of Supplemental Material for a wider temperature range). For NdFeO_{3} (Fig. 8a), two linear regimes are found: one below 165 K encompassing the spin reorientation process, and another below 70 K, during the Nd^{3+} spins ordering process. Apparently, the different slopes of the linear relations result from the different mechanisms involved in each process.
For TbFeO_{3}, a unique linear dependence is observed, from 313 to 25 K. Below 25 K no linearity is observed, which could be associated with precursor effects of the spinreorientation taking place at 20 K. In EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3} (Fig. 8c,d), the unique linear dependence found below 250 K shows that these wavenumbers deviations origin from the magnetic changes, seen here via the spin–phonon coupling. In GdFeO_{3} this linearity is lost below 100 K, where strong nonmonotonous variations of the M(T) curve are observed. This quantitative analysis allows us to state that the found magnetostructural effect results from a linear spin–phonon coupling that mediates the [010]_{pc} inphase octahedra rotational phonon and the magnetic structure.
To further evidence that the Nd(z) and Tb(z)oscillation modes are sensing the same phenomena of the [010]_{pc} inphase octahedra rotation mode, we have studied the correlation between their wavenumbers, shown in Fig. 9. We chose the R(z) instead of the R(x), because for the case of TbFeO_{3} only the former shows a deviation similar to the FeO_{6} rotation mode. The linear correlations between their wavenumbers found in the analyzed temperature ranges evidence for a coupling between them, with an unknown phenomenologically proportionality constant. For TbFeO_{3}, around 133 K, within the temperature interval where the slope of the linear temperature dependencies of both the \(F(t)\) and M1 wavenumber curves changes the most, there is also a change of the found phenomenologically proportionality constant between these modes. This could not be observed in GdFeO_{3} due to the absence of coupling between the Gd^{3+} motions and spins.
Conclusions
We have reported an experimental study of the magnetization, Ramanactive spin excitations and lattice dynamics in RFeO_{3} (R = Nd, Eu, Gd, and Tb) in the 10 to 850 K range. The main outcomes are summarized in the following.
Besides the known spinreorientation of NdFeO_{3}, anomalies in the temperature dependence of magnetization and wavenumber of both the magnons and the FeO_{6} rotation modes evidence for magnetic changes in TbFeO_{3}, EuFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3}, between 25 and 350 K, which are not associated with symmetry breaking nor magnetic phase transitions. The reinforcement of the ferromagnetic response of TbFeO_{3} and GdFeO_{3} is evidenced by both the increasing of magnetization as temperature decreases, and the anomalous temperature behavior of the ferromagnetic mode (magnon M1) at specific temperatures.
The sensitivity of the optical phonons to the Fe–Fe and R–Fe magnetic interactions was evidenced. The linear dependence on the magnetization of the anomalous contribution to the phonon wavenumber, just below the temperature where anomalies in M(T) are observed, distinctly bears the coupling between the [010]_{pc} inphase FeO_{6} rotation mode and the spin structure, through a linear spin–phonon coupling. Thus, the second main outcome concerns the common magnetostructural coupling, evidenced by FeO_{6} octahedra rotations. Like the FeO_{6} rotational modes, the Ramanactive Roscillation modes are sensitive to the R–Fe magnetic interactions, provided a strong spin–phonon coupling mediated by spin–orbit coupling. In NdFeO_{3} and TbFeO_{3}, wherein spin–orbit coupling of the Rcations exists, Roscillations are coupled to the [010]_{pc} inphase octahedra rotational modes. The experimental results give strong evidence for the crosstalk between Fe^{3+} and Nd^{3+}/Tb^{3+} spin sublattice, denoting the third main outcome of this work. The largest variations of the magnon M1 and both studied Raman modes are the largest for TbFeO_{3}. Moreover, the smaller spin–phonon coupling strength found for the Ndoscillations in NdFeO_{3} suggests that the anisotropy of the Nd–Fe interaction plays a more important role on triggering the spinreorientation at higher temperatures rather than its strength. Contrarily though, no deviation of these two modes could be observed for GdFeO_{3}, demonstrating the key role played by the spin–orbit coupling to underlie the interplay between spins and the Gdoscillation phonon.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
18 January 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598023281813
References
Gilleo, M. A. Magnetic properties of a gadolinium orthoferrite, GdFeO_{3} crystal. J. Chem. Phys. 24, 1239–1243 (1956).
Treves, D. Studies on orthoferrites at the Weizmann Institute of Science. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1033 (1965).
Bertaut, E. F., Chappert, J., Mareschal, J., Rebouillat, J. P. & Sivardière, J. Structures magnetiques de TbFeO_{3}. Solid State Commun. 5, 293–298 (1967).
Eibschütz, M., Shtrikman, S. & Treves, D. Mössbauer studies of Fe_{57} in orthoferrites. Phys. Rev. 156, 562–577 (1967).
White, R. L. Review of recent work on the magnetic and spectroscopic properties of the rareearth orthoferrites. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1061 (1969).
Gordon, J. D., Gorodetsky, G. & Hornreich, R. M. Magnetization studies of TbFeO_{3}. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 3, 288–294 (1976).
Yuan, S. J. et al. Spin switching and magnetization reversal in singlecrystal NdFeO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184405 (2013).
Zhao, Z. Y. et al. Ground state and magnetic phase transitions of orthoferrite DyFeO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 89, 224405 (2014).
Zhao, H. J., Bellaiche, L., Chen, X. M. & Íñiguez, J. Improper electric polarization in simple perovskite oxides with two magnetic sublattices. Nat. Commun. 8, 14025 (2017).
Artyukhin, S. et al. Solitonic lattice and Yukawa forces in the rareearth orthoferrite TbFeO_{3}. Nat. Mater. 11, 694–699 (2012).
Tokunaga, Y., Iguchi, S., Arima, T. & Tokura, Y. Magneticfieldinduced ferroelectric state in DyFeO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 097205 (2008).
Tokunaga, Y. et al. Composite domain walls in a multiferroic perovskite ferrite. Nat. Mater. 8, 558–562 (2009).
Bousquet, E. & Cano, A. Noncollinear magnetism in multiferroic perovskites. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 123001 (2016).
Bertaut, E. F. Configurations magnétiques. Méthode de fourier. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 21, 256–279 (1961).
Tokunaga, Y., Taguchi, Y., Arima, T. H. & Tokura, Y. Electricfieldinduced generation and reversal of ferromagnetic moment in ferrites. Nat. Phys. 8, 838–844 (2012).
Senn, M. S. & Bristowe, N. C. A grouptheoretical approach to enumerating magnetoelectric and multiferroic couplings in perovskites. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 74, 308–321 (2018).
Zhao, H. J., Íñiguez, J., Chen, X. M. & Bellaiche, L. Origin of the magnetization and compensation temperature in rareearth orthoferrites and orthochromates. Phys. Rev. B 93, 014417 (2016).
Moreira, J. A. et al. Coupling between phonons and magnetic excitations in orthorhombic EuYMnO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 81, 054447 (2010).
Weingart, C., Spaldin, N. & Bousquet, E. Noncollinear magnetism and singleion anisotropy in multiferroic perovskites. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 86, 094413 (2012).
Park, B. G. et al. Magnetic properties of the orthoferrites TbFeO_{3} and ErFeO 3. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 53, 758–762 (2008).
Zhou, Z., Guo, L., Yang, H., Liu, Q. & Ye, F. Hydrothermal synthesis and magnetic properties of multiferroic rareearth orthoferrites. J. Alloys Compd. 583, 21–31 (2014).
Vilarinho, R. et al. Dzyaloshinskii Moriya nature of ferroelectric ordering in magnetoelectric GdYMnO_{3} system. Solid State Commun. 208, 34–40 (2015).
Ramesh Babu, P. et al. Investigation of magnetic property of GdFeO_{3} single crystal grown in air by optical floating zone technique. J. Alloys Compd. 631, 232–236 (2015).
Van Vleck, J. H. Magnetic case history of the Eu^{3+} ion. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 365–372 (1968).
Mihalik, M. et al. Magnetic phase diagram of the TbMn1xFexO_{3} solid solution system. Phys. B Condens. Matter 506, 163–167 (2017).
White, R. M., Nemanich, R. J. & Herring, C. Light scattering from magnetic excitations in orthoferrites. Phys. Rev. B 25, 1822 (1982).
Venugopalan, S., Dutta, M., Ramdas, A. K. & Remeika, J. P. Magnetic and vibrational excitations in rareearth orthoferrites: A Raman scattering study. Phys. Rev. B 31, 1490 (1985).
Koshizuka, N. & Hayashi, K. Raman scattering from magnon excitations in RFeO_{3}. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57, 4418–4428 (1988).
White, R. M., Nemanichi, R. J. & Tsang, C. Raman scattering from magnons in rare earth orthoferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 15–18, 773–774 (1980).
Jiang, J. et al. Dynamical spin reorientation transition in NdFeO_{3} single crystal observed with polarized terahertz time domain spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 062403 (2013).
Song, G. et al. Spin reorientation transition process in single crystal NdFeO_{3}. Solid State Commun. 211, 47–51 (2015).
Yamaguchi, K., Kurihara, T., Minami, Y., Nakajima, M. & Suemoto, T. Terahertz timedomain observation of spin reorientation in orthoferrite ErFeO_{3} through magnetic free induction decay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 137204 (2013).
Grishunin, K. et al. Terahertz magnonpolaritons in TmFeO_{3}. ACS Photon. 5, 1375–1380 (2018).
Weber, M. C. et al. Raman spectroscopy of rareearth orthoferrites RFeO_{3} (R = La, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy). Phys. Rev. B 94, 214103 (2016).
Balkanski, M., Wallis, R. F. & Haro, E. Anharmonic effects in light scattering due to optical phonons in silicon. Phys. Rev. B 28, 1928 (1983).
Ponosov, Y. S. & Novoselov, D. Y. Lattice and spin excitations of YFeO_{3}: A Raman and density functional theory study. Phys. Rev. B 102, 054418 (2020).
Laverdière, J. et al. Spin–phonon coupling in orthorhombic RMnO_{3} (R=Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y): A Raman study. Phys. Rev. B 73, 214301 (2006).
Bhadram, V. S., Rajeswaran, B., Sundaresan, A. & Narayana, C. Spin–phonon coupling in multiferroic RCrO_{3} (RY, Lu, Gd, Eu, Sm): A Raman study. Europhys. Lett. 101, 17008 (2013).
Kovaleva, N. N. et al. Anomalous multiorder Raman scattering in LaMnO_{3}: A signature of quantum lattice effects in a JahnTeller crystal. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 155602 (2013).
Weber, M. C. et al. Emerging spin–phonon coupling through crosstalk of two magnetic sublattices. Nat. Commun. 13, 443 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We are deeply acknowledged to J. L. Ribeiro for the fruitful discussion regarding the interpretation of the magnetic data, and P. Bouvier suggestions on the analysis of some specific phonons. We acknowledge funding from NORTE010145FEDER022096, UIDB/04968/2020 and PTDC/NANMAT/28538/2017 projects and R.V. to the grant from PTDC/NANMAT/0098/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.T. produced the samples. R.V. performed magnetization measurements. R.V., M.W. and A.M. performed Raman spectroscopy measurements. C.D. wrote an algorithm for Raman spectra analysis. R.V., M.W., M.G., J.K., A.A. and J.M. wrote the main manuscript text and R.V. prepared figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in the Acknowledgements section. “We are deeply acknowledged to J. L. Ribeiro for the fruitful discussion regarding the interpretation of the magnetic data, and P. Bouvier suggestions on the analysis of some specific phonons. We acknowledge funding from NORTE010145FEDER022096, UID/NAN/50024/2019 and PTDC/NANMAT/28538/2017 projects and R.V. to the grant from PTDC/NANMAT/0098/2020.” now reads: “We are deeply acknowledged to J. L. Ribeiro for the fruitful discussion regarding the interpretation of the magnetic data, and P. Bouvier suggestions on the analysis of some specific phonons. We acknowledge funding from NORTE010145FEDER022096, UIDB/04968/2020 and PTDC/NANMAT/28538/2017 projects and R.V. to the grant from PTDC/NANMAT/0098/2020.”
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vilarinho, R., Weber, M.C., Guennou, M. et al. Magnetostructural coupling in RFeO_{3} (R = Nd, Tb, Eu and Gd). Sci Rep 12, 9697 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598022130971
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598022130971
This article is cited by

Lattice excitations in NdFeO3 through polarized optical spectroscopies
Scientific Reports (2024)

Structural, morphological, and magnetic features of granular TbFeO3 perovskite synthesized via direct solution combustion synthesis
Journal of SolGel Science and Technology (2024)

Impact of Tb substitution on structural, electrical and magnetic properties of Ho1−xTbxFeO3 orthoferrite
Applied Physics A (2024)

Structural, dielectric, magnetodielectric and optical properties of (Ba, Mn) codoped NdFeO3 nanomaterials
Bulletin of Materials Science (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.