Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inhibits root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community

Abstract

Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 is a multifunctional plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strain with nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing capability which can be employed for root-knot nematode (RKN) management on various crops and vegetables. Here we investigated the control efficacy of B. vietnamiensis B418 inoculation against RKN on watermelon, applied either alone or combined with nematicides fosthiazate or avermectin, and their effects on bacterial and fungal microbiomes in rhizosphere soil. The results of field experiments showed individual application of B418 displayed the highest control efficacy against RKN by 71.15%. The combinations with fosthiazate and avermectin exhibited slight incompatibility with lower inhibitory effects of 62.71% and 67.87%, respectively, which were still notably higher than these nematicides applied separately. Analysis of microbiome assemblages revealed B418 inoculation resulted in a slight reduction for bacterial community and a significant increment for fungal community, suggesting that B418 could compete with other bacteria and stimulate fungal diversity in rhizosphere. The relative abundance of Xanthomonadales, Gemmatimonadales and Sphingomonadales increased while that of Actinomycetales reduced with B418 inoculation. The predominate Sordariomycetes of fungal community decreased dramatically in control treatment with B418 inoculation whereas there were increments in fosthiazate and avermectin treatments. Additionally, nitrogen (N) cycling by soil microbes was estimated by quantifying the abundance of microbial functional genes involved in N-transformation processes as B418 has the capability of N-fixation. The copy number of N-fixing gene nifH increased with B418 inoculation, and the highest increment reached 35.66% in control treatment. Our results demonstrate that B. vietnamiensis B418 is an effective biological nematicide for nematode management, which acts through the modulation of rhizosphere microbial community.

Introduction

Root-knot nematodes (RKN), Meloidogyne spp., are highly polyphagous sedentary parasites capable of infesting a wide range of crops especially in greenhouse vegetable cultivation1,2. During infestation, RKN can incite obvious knots or galls on plant roots, destroy the normal structure of the roots, compete with the host for water and nutrition, and make the host susceptible to secondary pathogens3,4,5. Globally RKN damage is estimated to cause an annual economic loss of over $100 billion, accounting for about 12.6% of total crop losses6.

The control of RKN in intensive vegetable cultivation systems relies heavily on fumigants, carbamate, and organophosphate nematicides7. Currently there are three non-fumigant nematicides available in China: fosthiazate, avermectin, and fluopyram8. Fosthiazate is an organophosphorus acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that adversely disrupts the function of nervous system in nematode synapses and subsequently reduces the extent of root invasion9. Avermectin is a natural macrocyclic polyketide initially produced by Streptomyces avermitilis, which can open glutamate-gated chloride channels and paralyze nematodes specifically and irreversibly10,11. Yet the extensive reliance on fumigants and chemical nematicides is arousing severe concerns regarding environmental and human health issues12.

The use of biocontrol agents to reduce RKN damagehas provided an environment-friendly alternative13. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are beneficial bacteria that colonize the rhizosphere and plant roots resulting in enhancement of plant growth or protection against plant pathogens via production and secretion of various regulatory chemicals14. PGPR-based bioagents such as the strains of genus Bacillus spp., Burkholderia spp., and Pseudomonas spp. have been assessed for the control of RKN, which can attack and kill RKN by diverse processes including capturing, parasitizing, and producing toxins and enzymes, and induce plant systemic acquired resistance15,16. Luo et al. reported that Bacillus mycoides R2 exhibited control efficiency by 90.94% against M. incognita in a pot experiment and the nematicidal compound was isolated and identified as styrene17. Siddiqui and Shaukat discovered that Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 induced systemic resistance against RKN via a signal transduction pathway which was independent of salicylic acid accumulation in tomato roots18. Li et al. found Burkholderia ambifaria BC-F released a diffusable metabolite which inhibited egg hatch and mobility of second-stage juveniles (J2) of M. incognita19. Khanna et al. used P. aeruginosa and Burkholderia gladiol to reduce the negative effect of RKN in seedlings and improved the growth effect and antioxidative potential of tomato20. Although many microorganisms have been isolated and selected as bioagents for controlling RKN, the control effect of these agents are often unstable in field21. Nevertheless, worldwide researches suggest that sustainable nematode-control methods are available and preferred using integrated measures22,23.

The interactions among RKN, biocontrol agents, and rhizosphere microbiota have not been fully illustrated in the soil ecosystem5,24. There is still limited information on the influence of the inoculation of biocontrol agents on microbial communities and activities present in the rhizosphere. As a critical role for plant health, rhizosphere microbiota is related to their contribution to plant nutrition and biomass25. Microbial communities supply plant-available nitrogen (N) through biological N fixation and mineralization, and convert N into multiple chemical forms by nitrification and denitrification processes26,27. Babic et al. reported an increased alfalfa yield with seed inoculation by two Sinorhizobium meliloti strains, which was related to enhanced nitrogen content and the abundances of N-fixing gene (nifH) and ammonia-oxidizing gene (amoA)28. Ke et al. also found improved maize growth and nitrogen content inoculated by endophytic P. stutzeri A1501 that could be attributed to the positive effect of A1501 on the population of N-cycling communities and functional genes transcripts of nifH and amoA29. With the development of metagenomics and metabolomics analyses, the study of microbial ecosystem structure can be performed to a greater depth and accuracy30.

Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418, belonging in the B. cepacia complex, is a multifunctional PGPR strain with nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing capability which can be described within the assembly of the B418 genome31. We have identified several nematode virulence factors from B418 such as degrading enzymes of chitinase and protease, and secondary metabolites including cyclic dipeptide and siderophore, which exhibited high inhibitory effect against RKN on cucumber and eggplant32,33,34. In this study, we examined the nematode control efficacy and corresponding influences on the microbiome assemblages and abundances of N-cycling genes in the rhizosphere of watermelon under continuous cropping greenhouse conditions, with B418 inoculated either alone or in combination with nematicides fosthiazate or avermectin.

Results

Control efficacy of B418 inoculation against RKN

The effects of different treatments on the reduction rate of nematode density and control efficacy against RKN are presented in Table 1. All treatments reduced nematode density to some extent compared with the negative control (CK−). The highest reduction rate and control efficacy was observed with B. vietnamiensis B418 inoculation alone by 74.84% and 71.15%, respectively. The introduction of B418 enhanced the inhibitory effects of chemical nematicide fosthiazate (from 38.92% to 62.71%) and biological nematicide avermectin (from 59.24% to 67.87%), which were still lower than that of B418 inoculated alone, indicating there was slight incompatibility within the combinations of B418 with fosthiazate and avermectin.

Table 1 Effects of different treatments on the density of root knot nematode juveniles in rhizpsphere soils of greenhouse-grown watermelon. Data in the table are mean of 3 replicates. Means followed by different letters within a column are significantly different (P < 0.05, Duncan’s test). CK: control; FOST: fosthiazate; AVM: avermectin. (+ /-) stands for with and without B418 inoculation.

The effect of B418 inoculation on microbial OTU composition

To evaluate the similarity and difference of the microbial community structures in all treatments, a principal component analysis (PCA) based on weighted UniFrac distance metrics was performed. As delineated in Fig. 1, PC1 and PC2 accounted for 19.69% and 13.97% of the total variation for bacterial community, and PC1 and PC2 represented 19.28% and 12.50% of the variance for fungal community, respectively. The results indicated that treatments with and without B418 inoculation showed clear separation for both bacterial and fungal communities by PCA analysis, with significant effect on the composition of bacterial community and moderate one of fungal community.

Figure 1
figure 1

The effects of Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inoculation on microbial composition of rhizosphere soil of watermelon. Biplots included principal component analysis (PCA) with weighted UniFrac distances for (a) bacterial community and (b) fungal community in different treatments. CK: control; FOST: fosthiazate; AVM: avermectin. (+ /−) stands for with and without B418 inoculation.

The constrained principal component analysis identified the effect of strain B418 treatment and its interaction with other disease control treatments (Table 2). The application of B418 increased bacterial 16S rRNA sequences from 9.1% to 34.6%, and fungal ITS-2 rRNA sequences from 7.1% to 30.3%, which both exhibited more variation than the disease control treatments.

Table 2 Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 and its interaction with other disease control treatments.

Relative abundances, analyzed by Bray–Curtis distance, were presented in Fig. 2. The effect of B418 inoculation was significant while the difference was small (P < 0.05). For the bacterial community, fosthiazate treatment reduced bacterial population density compared with control and avermectin treatments with B418 inoculation. For the fungal community, the lowest relative abundance was observed in avermectin treatment.

Figure 2
figure 2

The relative abundance by Bray–Curtis distance of (a) bacterial community and (b) fungal community in the rhizosphere of different treatments with Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inoculation. Error bar indicates standard error at P = 0.05 in the ANOVA test for microbial content. CK: control; FOST: fosthiazate; AVM: avermectin.

The effect of B418 inoculation on OTU diversity

The Shannon index was used to estimate the alpha diversity and the proportion of variation within and between treatments. The effects of factor 1 and factor 2 applications were significant for both the bacterial and fungal communities, and the variation in fungal diversity was larger than that in bacterial diversity (Fig. 3a,b). Interestingly, B418 inoculation caused a slight reduction for the bacterial community and a significant increment for the fungal community in all treatments except fosthiazate. For the bacterial community, B418 inoculation in control and fosthiazate treatments led to slight declines in diversity, while a slight increase was observed in avermectin treatment. Conversely, B418 inoculation resulted notable increased diversity for the fungal community in control treatment, while a distinct decline was observed in fosthiazate and avermectin treatments. The results suggested that B418 could compete with other bacteria and stimulate fungal diversity in the rhizosphere.

Figure 3
figure 3

The effects of Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inoculation on microbial alpha diversity in the rhizosphere of greenhouse-grown watermelon. Columns show the Shannon index for (a) bacterial communities and (b) fungal communities within and among different treatments. CK: control; FOST: fosthiazate; AVM: avermectin. (+ /−) stands for with and without B418 inoculation.

The effect of B418 inoculation on microbial taxa

The differences in predominate microbial taxa in the rhizosphere between treatments with and without B418 inoculation were shown in Fig. 4. The taxonomic level was set at Order for bacteria, and Genus for fungi, but in higher taxonomic groupings where genus could not be identified. Xanthomonadales, Actinomycetales, Myxococcales, Rhizobiales, Gemmatimonadales, Sphingomonadales, and Rhodospirillales were the predominate orders in the rhizosphere bacterial community of all treatments (Fig. 4a). B418 inoculation resulted in a higher abundance of Xanthomonadales, Gemmatimonadales and Sphingomonadales, and lower proportions of Actinomycetales in all treatments (Fig. 4a). A higher abundance of Myxococcales and lower proportions of Rhizobiales were also found in fosthiazate and avermectin treatments with B418 inoculation.

Figure 4
figure 4

Taxonomic composition influenced by Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inoculation in different treatments at (a) order level for bacteria, and (b) genus level for fungi. CK: control; FOST: fosthiazate; AVM: avermectin. (+ /−) stands for with and without B418 inoculation.

Unclassified Sordariomycetes were predominate in the rhizosphere fungal communities, and there was a high percentage of Humicola, Chrysosporium and unclassified Ascobolaceae in all treatments (Fig. 4b). Sordariomycetes decreased dramatically in control treatment with B418 inoculation whereas there were increments observed in fosthiazate and avermectin treatments. For control treatment, Humicola, Chrysosporium, Ascobolaceae, and Cercophora all decreased with B418 inoculation whereas Madurella and Mortierella increased. For fosthiazate treatment, B418 inoculation caused an increase in Sordariomycetes, Humicola, Chrysosporium, and Ascobolaceae together with a significant decrease in Gymnostellatospora. And for avermectin treatment, a clear increase of Sordariomycetes and decrease of Humicola and Madurella were observed with B418 inoculation.

The effect of B418 inoculation on the abundance of Burkholderia spp.

The relative abundance of Burkholderia spp. in all treatments were monitored by detection of viable cells (colony forming units, CFU) using their OTUs (Fig. 5). There were significant increments observed for both control and avermectin treatments with B418 inoculation, which increased around 3.1-fold for control treatment. On the contrary the relative abundance of Burkholderia spp. declined sharply in fosthiazate treatment with B418 inoculation.

Figure 5
figure 5

The relative abundance of Burkholderia spp. in different treatments. Error bar and * indicate standard error at P = 0.05 in the ANOVA test for microbial content. CK: control; FOST: fosthiazate; AVM: avermectin. (+ /−) stands for with and without B418 inoculation.

The effect of B418 inoculation on the abundance of N-cycling genes

Five functional genes related to nitrogen fixation (nifH), nitrification (archaeal amoA and bacterial amoA), and denitrification (nirK, nirS, and nosZ) were included for the estimation of N cycling by soil microbes since B418 has been verified for the capability of N fixation. As delineated in Fig. 6, the abundance of N-fixing nifH gene was increased in all treatments with B418 inoculation. The highest increment reached 35.66% in control treatment (from 2.56 × 105 to 3.48 × 105) which was 2~3-fold greater than fosthiazate and avermectin treatments (1.20~1.37 × 105 and 1.57~1.84 × 105, respectively). B418 inoculation resulted in decrement for bacterial amoA, nirK, and nirS in control treatment, and slight increment for archaeal amoA and nosZ. There was decrement observed for archaeal amoA, bacterial amoA, and nirK in avermectin treatment, and increment for nirS and nosZ with B418 inoculation. Interestingly, all nitrification and denitrification genes decreased dramatically in fosthiazate treatment.

Figure 6
figure 6

Quantitative PCR of nitrogen-cycling gene abundances. The abundance of six N-cycling genes involved in nitrogen fixation (a, nifH), ammonia oxidation by archaea (b, archaeal amoA) and bacteria (c, bacterial amoA), and denitrification (d-f, nirK, nirS, nosZ) in different treatments. CK: control; FOST: fosthiazate; AVM: avermectin. (+ /−) stands for with and without B418 inoculation. Error bar indicates standard error at P = 0.05 in the ANOVA test for microbial content.

Discussion

The results from field experiments in this study showed that B. vietnamiensis B418 inoculation could significantly reduce the incidence of RKN by 71.15% on watermelon, while potential conflicts were detected when combined with nematicides fosthiazate and avermectin. Although the control efficacy of B418 with fosthiazate or avermectin were lower than the individual application of B418, these combinations could reduce the utilization of nematicides by a synergistic additive effect on nematode suppression. There were several studies suggesting the combination of biocontrol agents with fosthiazate or avermectin for nematode control and plant promotion35. Combined application of Syncephalastrum racemosum and avermectin reduced the number of nematode galls and enhanced cucumber growth36. The reduction of M. incognita and the increment of tomato yield were observed using avermectin together with P. fluorescens or Trichoderma viride37,38. However, in contrast to previous reports, the suppression efficacy of both combinations with fosthiazate and avermectin was still lower than B418 inoculated alone. This might be attributed to the incompatibility of B418 with both nematicides, especially with fosthiazate the inoculation of B418 even resulted in dramatic decline of Burkholderia spp. and reduced bacterial population density.

As PGPR are considered as opportunist and can rapidly adapt to the environment according to variations in the nature and quantity of root exudates, they are capable of colonizing the rhizosphere and establishing a tight relationship with roots which are usually favored by plant host39,40. The beneficial effects of PGPR on plant growth involve either direct mechanism such as biofertilization (facilitation of nutrient uptake including nitrogen and phosphorus primarily) and phytostimulation (production of plant growth promoting hormones), or indirect mechanism as biocontrol agents that antagonize the deleterious effects of phytopathogens by producing inhibitory substances or by inducing plant systemic resistance41. Our previous researches have verified the capability of B418 as PGPR strain both with direct enhancement of plant growth by nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization and with indirect promotion by degrading enzymes and secondary metabolites32,33,34. B418 inoculation on watermelon exhibited symbiotic and/or mutualistic interactions with microbial community in the rhizosphere, presenting notable change on the composition of the bacterial community and marginal difference on fungal community as indicated by PCA analysis. Ciccillo et al. reported Burkholderia ambifaria MCI 7 promoted maize growth significantly and brought about an abrupt decrease in bacterial diversity when applied as a seed treatment42. Jo et al. discovered there was also an obvious change in soil bacterial community structure due to the application of Bacillus thuringiensis43. Similarly, Wang et al. discussed the significant effect of two microbial co-inoculants with the same three strains (Ensifer sp., Acinetobacter sp., and Flavobacterium sp.) on soil bacterial communities that were strongly separated by the different microbial inoculation treatments44. These examples illustrate that the impacts of PGPR on rhizosphere indigenous bacterial communities are likely to be a net result of both positive and negative effects45.

The diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community structure is an important indicator reflecting the health status of soil46. From the microbiome results presented here it could be concluded that the effect of B418 inoculation was significant while the difference was small. This was possibly because all samples in this study were collected from the rhizosphere, unlike the previous papers where different compartments from across the soil and plant root interface were used44,47. Application of B418 resulted in a slight reduction for the bacterial community diversity (Shannon index) and an increase for the fungal community, except for the combination with avermectin. These opposite trends for the impact of B418 inoculation on bacterial and fungal community diversity demonstrated that strain B418 could compete with other bacteria in the rhizosphere and stimulate fungal diversity simultaneously48. The diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms in B418 treatment was not significantly different from that in control treatment, indicating that B418 inoculation had slight effects on the soil microbial diversity in the roots of watermelon.

The general predominance of Xanthomonadales, Rhizobiales, Sphingomonadales, Rhodospirillales, and Actinomycetales that we observed was expected, and the first four groups were all subdivisions of Proteobacteria. As predominate members of the rhizosphere microbial community, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were suggested to be dynamic taxa associated with plant disease suppression in previous studies using DNA metagenomics49,50. Zhou et al. found that the phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflex were more abundant in non-infested microbiota than in M. incognita-infested microbiota51. Interestingly, B418 inoculation resulted in an increase in Xanthomonadales, Gemmatimonadales, and Sphingomonadales whereas Actinomycetales decreased in all treatments. This was consistent with the metagenomic sequencing results by Zou et al. that oxytetracycline treatment for the control of RKN enhanced the abundance of Proteobacteria phylum but decreased the abundance of Actinobacteria52. Kong et al. also reported the contrary trends of significantly lower relative abundance of Burkholderiales and higher relative abundance of Actinomycetales, which might be caused by the occupation of nutritional niches in the rhizosphere by Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria53.

Gemmatimonadales are a recently described bacterial group whose members are widespread in soil habitats yet mostly non-culturable, and they can accumulate polyphosphate and play important roles in phosphorus removal54. The increase in Gemmatimonadales with B418 inoculation might be attributed to the phosphate-solubilizing capability of B418 causing the accumulation of phosphorus in the rhizosphere. Myxococcales most commonly inhabit topsoil, especially soil that is rich in organic matter55. Schmidt et al. identified three members of the order Myxococcales (identified as the genera Phaselicystis, Archangium, and Myxococcus) and two members of the order Burkholderiales (identified as the genera Rhizobacter and Achromobacter) were indicators of organic environments56. The increase in Myxococcales might be associated with the application of B418 for its multiple PGPR functions in soil, which was in line with previous studies revealing these orders to be organic-system-specific.

Compared with the bacterial community of the watermelon rhizosphere, the fungal community was more diverse and variant with B418 inoculation. Unclassified Sordariomycetes were predominate of fungal community, which were dramatically decreased in control treatment with B418 inoculation. Hu et al characterized that Ascomycota was predominate in the fungal communities associated with soybean cyst nematode, comprising more than half of the OTUs at each sampling time point57. Sordariomycetes were one of the highest number of OTUs at the class level in Ascomycota and particularly showed significantly higher relative abundance in longer soybean crop sequences and continuous monoculture57. Other most abundant genera were Humicola, Chrysosporium, Mortierella, Madurella, Cercophora, and Gymnostellatospora. However, there were no obvious patterns that all treatments followed after B418 inoculation. Humicola, Chrysosporium, Ascobolaceae, and Cercophora all decreased with B418 inoculation whereas Madurella and Mortierella increased in control treatment. Humicola could produce cellulose acetate deacetylase with biodegradative activity in disposal environments and result in an increase in the levels of lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose in the soil, which generally lead to an increase in the number of nematodes that feed on crop plants58. The decrease of Humicola with B418 inoculation was favorable for the control of RKN. On the contrary, Mortierella are known to decompose chitin and have the ability to suppress many pathogens59. For example, M. alpina can synthesize alkaloid antibiotics and enhance the protection of plants against worms and phytopathogens60. Furthermore, both M. alpina and M. signyensis are apt at killing insect pests by inoculation or injection61. The increment of Mortierella with B418 application was in accordance with the control effect against RKN. These variations in fungal community indicated that B418 inoculation resulted in the inhibition of pathogen-related species and the enhancement of plant-beneficial ones.

It has been documented that B. vietnamiensis B418 is a nitrogen-fixing bacterium31, so the other N-fixing bacteria Rhizobiales were reduced in rhizosphere with B418 inoculation which was predictable and might be explained by the substitution of strain B418 that could supply N to plants with its ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. With regard to nutrient uptake mechanisms, B418 was found to enhance the copy number of N-fixing gene nifH in all treatments. Biological N-fixation can transform nitrogen to the biologically usable ammonia, which is also generated through soil mineralization62. This process is essential to catalyze N-fixation, and the nifH gene is often used as a marker gene for the molecular analysis of N-fixing microbes63. The enhancement of nifH in this study was in consistency with the results of Pham et al. in which biological N-fixation by inoculated Pseudomonas stutzeri strain A15 was responsible for a small contribution to rice plant nitrogen64. However, other studies indicated that wild-type P. stutzeri A1501 and nifH-mutant colonized maize roots equally, and the deficiency of nifH gene does not affect the ability of N-fixing bacteria to colonize the maize plant29. Interestingly, Ouyang et al. reported that N fertilization significantly suppressed the nifH abundance in the rhizosphere, while N fertilization had no effect on the nifH abundance in the bulk soil65. This suggested that N-fixers were more sensitive to N addition in the rhizosphere and the application of N fertilization might reduce the potential of biological N input from free-living N-fixation. Dynarski and Houlton also reported that free-living N-fixation rate was significantly suppressed by N fertilization in natural terrestrial ecosystems66.

There were no consistent patterns found regarding N-cycling genes involved in nitrification (archaeal amoA and bacterial amoA) and denitrification (nirS, nirK, and nosZ). These genes were significantly correlated with each other, largely because a similar N fertilization effect was observed for these genes67. Ouyang et al. reported that N fertilization significantly increased archaeal amoA, bacterial amoA, nirK, nirS, and nosZ, indicating N fertilization stimulated the growth of nitrifiers and denitirifers in the rhizosphere relative to the bulk soil65.

In summary, the application of B. vietnamiensis B418 was able to reduce the incidence of root-knot nematode on watermelon significantly, and to reduce the utilization of other nematicides, while potential conflicts were detected when combined with fosthiazate and avermectin. The investigation of rhizosphere microbiome assemblages demonstrated that strain B418 was capable of competing with other bacteria in the rhizosphere and stimulating fungal diversity. As a member of the Betaproteobacteria, B418 inoculation resulted in a higher relative abundance of other Proteobacteria and lower relative abundance of Actinomycetales. The predominate Sordariomycetes decreased dramatically for fungal community with B418 inoculated alone whereas these population increased in the combination treatments. In addition, the abundance of N-fixing gene nifH increased in all treatments with B418 inoculation as B418 has been verified for the capability of N-fixation. Our results indicated that strain B418 could play a larger role in agricultural systems as a promising PGPR and biocontrol agent in future.

Methods

Microorganisms and plant species

Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 (China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, CGMCC No.1212) was isolated from barley soil and maintained at –80 °C as previously described32. Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cv. Jingxin used in this study was the same as previously planted in the greenhouse, provided by the Institute of Vegetables and Flowers of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The study was performed in accordance with relevant local and national guidelines.

Experimental location

This study was conducted in the greenhouse with a history of watermelon cultivation in Linqu County, Weifang City, Shandong Province, China (36°45′ N, 118°47′ E). A high incidence of RKN had been observed for over a decade in this greenhouse due to continuous cropping.

Experimental design

The experiment was designed using a randomized design with 2 factors defining 6 treatments, and three replicates per treatment. The first factor was B. vietnamiensis B418 inoculation (i.e. inoculated, designated + hereafter; and uninoculated, designated − hereafter). The second factor was the application of chemical nematicide fosthiazate (FOST), biological nematicide avermectin (AVM), and control (CK). These two factors were combined to define six treatments listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Experimental treatments. Factor 1: ( +) with B. vietnamiensis B418 inoculation; ( −) without B. vietnamiensis B418 inoculation. Factor 2: Control (CK); Fosthiazate (FOST); Avermectin (AVM).

Site preparation

Soil plots (3 m \(\times \) 30 m) were treated with the corresponding biopreparations and nematicides to 20 cm depth at the planting holes on February 2, 2018. Transplantation of watermelon seedlings immediately followed treatment implementation. B. vietnamiensis B418 was freshly prepared using 100-fold dilutions of laboratory sourced preparations, to a concentration of 5 × 108 CFU/mL. Fosthiazate and avermectin were diluted to 10% and 1.8% w/v respectively as per manufacturers' instructions. Each of the prepared agents was combined with sterilized sand at the ratio 1:5 solution to sand, which was then sprinkled into planting holes at a rate of ca. 50 g/seedling.

Sampling and soil collection

On April 27, 2018 (Day 85 from transplantation), watermelons were harvested and the samples soil and roots were collected. Rhizosphere soils were extracted from 3 neighboring replicates according to the protocol of Bulgarelli et al68. Root systems were sampled from 0-20 cm soil depth and were shaken until approximately 1 mm soil remained attached to the roots. Roots with attached soil were then washed in Falcon tubes filled with PBS buffer (135 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, and 8 mM K2HPO4, pH 7.2), followed by shaking at 150 rpm for 30 min. The soil suspension was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min, and the pellet was collected as rhizosphere soil for analysis. All samples were stored at −80 °C prior to further analysis.

Assessment of RKN control efficacy

The numbers of nematodes in soil samples and disease severity were determined to evaluate the biocontrol efficacy of different treatments against RKN. The soil samples were processed separately to extract nematode juveniles using Cobb’s sieving and decanting method69. Juvenile nematodes were collected and observed under stereomicroscope in a counting dish, with data expressed as juveniles per 100 g of soil.

For the disease severity detection, the gall index (GI) of plant roots were determined on the following scale: 0 = no galling, 1 = 1–25% galling, 2 = 26–50% galling, 3 = 51–75% galling, and 4 = 76–100% galling70. The control efficacy was calculated as described by Niu et al71. Disease severity, reduction rate and control efficacy were calculated as following formulas:

$$\mathrm{Disease\, severity}=\left[\sum \frac{\mathrm{Number\, of\, plants\, with\, root}-\mathrm{knot\, nematode\, disease\, in\, this\, index }\times \mathrm{ Disease\, index}}{\mathrm{Number\, of\, plants\, surveyed }\times \mathrm{ Highest\, root}-\mathrm{knot\, nematode\, disease\, index}}\right]\times 100\%$$
(1)
$$\mathrm{Reduction\, rate}=\frac{\mathrm{Number\, of\, nematode\, density\, in\, negative\, control\, treatment }-\mathrm{ Number\, of\, nematode\, density\, in\, different\, treatment}}{\mathrm{Number\, of\, nematode\, density\, in\, negative\, control\, treatment}}\times 100\%$$
(2)
$$\mathrm{Control\, efficacy}=\frac{\mathrm{Disease\, severity\, of\, negative\, control\, treatment }-\mathrm{ Disease\, severity\, of\, different\, treatment}}{\mathrm{Disease\, severity\, of\, negative\, control\, treatment}}\times 100\%$$
(3)

Bacterial and fungal genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from 0.4 g rhizosphere soil samples using PowerSoil DNA isolation kits (MoBio Labroratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted DNA was electrophoresed on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel, and its mass and concentration were measured using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer (BioSpec-nano, Shimadzu, Japan).

PCR amplification and amplicon sequencing

The hypervariable V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 341f (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 785r (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′)72. The internal transcribed spacer-2 (ITS-2) region of fungi was amplified with the primer pair ITS7f (5′-CCAATTTAATCGCAGTGGCTTG-3′) and ITS127r (5′- CGACAGCCGTTTCACAACAATA-3′)73. PCR products were sequenced on the Illumina MiseqTM platform with 300 bp length of PE reads by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Real-time quantitative PCR of N-cycling Genes

The abundances of five representative N-cycling genes (nifH, archaeal amoA, bacterial amoA, nirK, nirS, and nosZ) were estimated using standard curves and real-time quantitative PCR on a CFX96 optical real-time detection system (Bio-Rad, Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA)74,75. Each 20 μL reaction contained 10μL of SYBR Green (2X) PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 250 ng μL-1 bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.2μL of the forward and reverse PCR primers (both 20 μM), 1 μL of DNA template (containing 10~20 ng of total DNA) and 8.6 μL of double-distilled water (ddH2O). The primer sequences and references used in qPCR are listed in Table 4. Standard curves were obtained using three replicates of serial dilutions of linearized plasmids containing fragments of nifH, archaeal amoA, bacterial amoA, nirK, nirS, or nosZ genes. The specificity of the qPCR procedure was determined by melting curve analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis.

Table 4 N-cycling genes primers used for qPCR quantification assays.

Bioinformatics analysis

The bioinformatic analysis was performed by removing primer adapter sequences with cutadapt (vs1.2.1), removing low-quality bases (Phred Quality Score = 20), and splicing, discarding low-quality sequences shorter than 100 bp in length (≈10% of the total sequences), and removing the specific amplification sequences and chimeras with Uchime (vs4.2.40) to obtain the effective value of sequence data for each sample76. Afterwards, clean reads of bacterial 16S and fungal ITS rRNA sequences were divided into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity using QIIME (vs1.8.0) with the UCLUST algorithm77. Annotation of the representative sequences of OTUs was performed by BLAST (vs2.2.30) against the Silva database (release 123) with similarity > 90% and coverage > 90%78.

Statistical analysis

The Vegan software package (vs3.4.3, Team 2013) in R was used for statistical analysis. The variance stabilizing transformation method in DESeq2 package (vs1.18.1) was applied to normalize the library sizes between samples79. Analysis of similarity between microbial communities was conducted by principal component analysis (PCA) according to weighted UniFrac distances matrix between sample OTUs composition using the Phyloseq package and Vegan package (vs2.4-5)80. Constrained principal component analysis was performed using the same weighted UniFrac distances by capscale () function in the Vegan package to test the effects on OTU composition of two experimental factors of B418 treatment and other application of nematicides and biopreparations. OTU composition was also analyzed using Bray–Curtis distance.

The alpha diversity measured by Shannon index was estimated after rarefying the number of sequences in each sample according to the sample with the minimum number of sequences, using the Vegan package. Relative abundances of predicted microbial functions between experimental treatments were compared using the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP) package (vs2.1.3)81.

Data availability

Raw sequence data reported in this paper are available in Genome Sequence Archive (GSA; http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa) in BIG Data Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences under the accession number CRA006248.

References

  1. Jones, J. T. et al. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 14, 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12057 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Collange, B., Navarrete, M., Peyre, G., Mateille, T. & Tchamitchian, M. Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne) management in vegetable crop production: The challenge of an agronomic system analysis. Crop Prot. 30, 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.04.016 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nyaku, S. T., Affokpon, A., Danquah, A. & Brentu, F. C. in Nematology–concepts, diagnosis and control (eds Mohammad Manjur Shah & Mohammad Mahamood) 153–182 (IntechOpen, 2017).

  4. Desaeger, J., Wram, C. & Zasada, I. New reduced-risk agricultural nematicides-rationale and review. J. Nematol. 52, 1 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, L. & Zhang, K. Microbial control of plant-parasitic nematodes: a five-party interaction. Plant Soil 288, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9009-3 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, S., Singh, B. & Singh, A. Nematodes: A threat to sustainability of agriculture. Procedia Environ. Sci. 29, 215–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.270 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oka, Y. Mechanisms of nematode suppression by organic soil amendments—A review. Appl. Soil Ecol. 44, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.11.003 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yue, X., Li, F. & Wang, B. Activity of four nematicides against Meloidogyne incognita race 2 on tomato plants. J. Phytopathol. 168, 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12904 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, W.-K. et al. Mutations in Acetylcholinesterase2 (ace 2) increase the insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase to fosthiazate in the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38102 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoon, Y., Kim, E.-S., Hwang, Y.-S. & Choi, C.-Y. Avermectin: Biochemical and molecular basis of its biosynthesis and regulation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63, 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1491-4 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolstenholme, A. J. & Rogers, A. Glutamate-gated chloride channels and the mode of action of the avermectin/milbemycin anthelmintics. Parasitology 131, S85–S95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182005008218 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haydock, P., Woods, S., Grove, I. & Hare, M. in Plant nematology (eds Roland N Perry & Maurice Moens) 459–479 (CABI, 2013).

  13. Forghani, F. & Hajihassani, A. Recent advances in the development of environmentally benign treatments to control root-knot nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01125 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lugtenberg, B. & Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mhatre, P. H. et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a potential alternative tool for nematodes bio-control. Biocatal. Agr. Biotechnol. 17, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.009 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eissa, M. F. & Abd-Elgawad, M. M. in Biocontrol agents of phytonematodes (eds Tarique Hassan Askary & Paulo Roberto Martinelli) 217–243 (CABI, 2015).

  17. Luo, T., Hou, S., Yang, L., Qi, G. & Zhao, X. Nematodes avoid and are killed by Bacillus mycoides-produced styrene. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 159, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2018.09.006 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Siddiqui, I. & Shaukat, S. Systemic resistance in tomato induced by biocontrol bacteria against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica is independent of salicylic acid production. J. Phytopathol. 152, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2003.00800.x (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, W. et al. Broad spectrum anti-biotic activity and disease suppression by the potential biocontrol agent Burkholderia ambifaria BC-F. Crop Protect. 21, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00074-6 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khanna, K. et al. Role of plant growth promoting Bacteria (PGPRs) as biocontrol agents of Meloidogyne incognita through improved plant defense of Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant. Soil 436, 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-03932-2 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Subedi, P., Gattoni, K., Liu, W., Lawrence, K. S. & Park, S.-W. Current utility of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents towards plant-parasitic nematodes. Plants 9, 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091167 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Oka, Y. et al. New strategies for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Pest Manag. Sci. 56, 983–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/1526-4998(200011)56:11%3c983::AID-PS233%3e3.0.CO;2-X (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ralmi, N. H. A. A., Khandaker, M. M. & Mat, N. Occurrence and control of root knot nematode in crops: A review. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 11, 1649 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Topalović, O. & Heuer, H. Plant-nematode interactions assisted by microbes in the rhizosphere. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 30, 75–88 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Olanrewaju, O. S., Ayangbenro, A. S., Glick, B. R. & Babalola, O. O. Plant health: Feedback effect of root exudates-rhizobiome interactions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103, 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9556-6 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Handley, K. M. et al. Biostimulation induces syntrophic interactions that impact C, S and N cycling in a sediment microbial community. ISME J. 7, 800–816. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.148 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang, Y. et al. Changes in nitrogen-cycling microbial communities with depth in temperate and subtropical forest soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 124, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.029 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Babić, K. H. et al. Influence of different Sinorhizobium meliloti inocula on abundance of genes involved in nitrogen transformations in the rhizosphere of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2922–2930 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ke, X. et al. Effect of inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacterium Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501 on maize plant growth and the microbiome indigenous to the rhizosphere. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 42, 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2018.10.010 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hogan, G. et al. Microbiome analysis as a platform R&D tool for parasitic nematode disease management. ISME J. 13, 2664–2680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0462-4 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu, Y. et al. Draft genome sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain B418, a promising agent for biocontrol of plant pathogens and root-knot nematode. Genome Announc. 3, e00015-00015. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00015-15 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Y. et al. Isolation and identification of nematicidal active substance from Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418. Plant Prot. 40, 65–69 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, S., Li, J., Xu, W., Chen, K. & Yang, H. Field efficacy test of biocontrol agent YKT41 and B418 against eggplant root-knot nematode disease. Shandong Sci. 24, 10–13 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, B., Pan, M. & Li, J. Field trial of Burkholderia vietnamiensis and its composite microbial flora on cucumber root-knot nematode. Shandong Sci. 31, 39. https://doi.org/10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2018.01.007 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saad, A.-F.S., Massoud, M. A., Ibrahim, H. S. & Khalil, M. S. Management study for the root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita on tomatoes using fosthiazate and arbiscular mycorrhiza fungus. J. Adv. Agric. Res. 16, 137–147 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huang, W.-K. et al. Efficacy evaluation of fungus Syncephalastrum racemosum and nematicide avermectin against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber. PLoS ONE 9, e89717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089717 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Jayakumar, J. & Ramakrishnan, S. Evaluation of avermectin and its combination with nematicide and bioagents against root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in tomato. J. Biol. Control 23, 317–319 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moosavi, M. & Zare, R. in Biocontrol Agents of Phytonematodes (eds Tarique Hassan Askary & Paulo Roberto Martinelli) 423–445 (CABI, 2015).

  39. Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. & Bakker, P. A. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Reinhold-Hurek, B., Bünger, W., Burbano, C. S., Sabale, M. & Hurek, T. Roots shaping their microbiome: Global hotspots for microbial activity. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 53, 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102342 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahemad, M. & Kibret, M. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 26, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.001 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ciccillo, F. et al. Effects of two different application methods of Burkholderia ambifaria MCI 7 on plant growth and rhizospheric bacterial diversity. Environ. Microbiol. 4, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00291.x (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jo, H. et al. Response of soil bacterial community and pepper plant growth to application of Bacillus thuringiensis KNU-07. Agronomy 10, 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040551 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, J. et al. Traits-based integration of multi-species inoculants facilitates shifts of indigenous soil bacterial community. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01692 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Welbaum, G. E., Sturz, A. V., Dong, Z. & Nowak, J. Managing soil microorganisms to improve productivity of agro-ecosystems. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490433295 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mendes, R., Garbeva, P. & Raaijmakers, J. M. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 634–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12028 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Li, J. et al. Trichoderma harzianum inoculation reduces the incidence of clubroot disease in Chinese cabbage by regulating the rhizosphere microbial community. Microorganisms 8, 1325. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091325 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Song, L. et al. Regular biochar and bacteria-inoculated biochar alter the composition of the microbial community in the soil of a Chinese fir plantation. Forests 11, 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090951 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mendes, R. et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332, 1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203980 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Palaniyandi, S. A., Yang, S. H., Zhang, L. & Suh, J.-W. Effects of actinobacteria on plant disease suppression and growth promotion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 9621–9636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5206-1 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou, D. et al. Rhizosphere microbiomes from root knot nematode non-infested plants suppress nematode infection. Microbial Ecol. 78, 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-019-01319-5 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zou, Y. et al. Metagenomic insights into the effect of oxytetracycline on microbial structures, functions and functional genes in sediment denitrification. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 161, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.045 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kong, Z. et al. Seasonal dynamics of the bacterioplankton community in a large, shallow, highly dynamic freshwater lake. Can. J. Microbiol. 64, 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2018-0126 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bach, E. M., Williams, R. J., Hargreaves, S. K., Yang, F. & Hofmockel, K. S. Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitats. Soil Biol. Biochem. 118, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.12.018 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, W. et al. Predatory Myxococcales are widely distributed in and closely correlated with the bacterial community structure of agricultural land. Appl. Soil Ecol. 146, 103365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103365 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schmidt, J. E., Kent, A. D., Brisson, V. L. & Gaudin, A. C. Agricultural management and plant selection interactively affect rhizosphere microbial community structure and nitrogen cycling. Microbiome 7, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0756-9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hu, W., Strom, N., Haarith, D., Chen, S. & Bushley, K. E. Mycobiome of cysts of the soybean cyst nematode under long term crop rotation. Front. Microbiol. 9, 386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00386 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Li, W.-H. & Liu, Q.-Z. Changes in fungal community and diversity in strawberry rhizosphere soil after 12 years in the greenhouse. J. Integ. Agric. 18, 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62003-9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Qiu, W. et al. Organic fertilization assembles fungal communities of wheat rhizosphere soil and suppresses the population growth of Heterodera avenae in the field. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01225 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Schardl, C. L., Leuchtmann, A. & Spiering, M. J. Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141735 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Edgington, S., Thompson, E., Moore, D., Hughes, K. A. & Bridge, P. Investigating the insecticidal potential of Geomyces (Myxotrichaceae: Helotiales) and Mortierella (Mortierellacea: Mortierellales) isolated from Antarctica. Springerplus 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-289 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yi, X. et al. Comparison of the abundance and community structure of N-Cycling bacteria in paddy rhizosphere soil under different rice cultivation patterns. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123772 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Duval, S. et al. Electron transfer precedes ATP hydrolysis during nitrogenase catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16414–16419. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311218110 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Pham, V. T. et al. The plant growth-promoting effect of the nitrogen-fixing endophyte Pseudomonas stutzeri A15. Arch. Microbiol. 199, 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1332-3 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ouyang, Y., Evans, S. E., Friesen, M. L. & Tiemann, L. K. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the abundance of nitrogen cycling genes in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis of field studies. Soil Biol. Biochem. 127, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.024 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dynarski, K. A. & Houlton, B. Z. Nutrient limitation of terrestrial free-living nitrogen fixation. New Phytol. 217, 1050–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14905 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kastl, E.-M., Schloter-Hai, B., Buegger, F. & Schloter, M. Impact of fertilization on the abundance of nitrifiers and denitrifiers at the root–soil interface of plants with different uptake strategies for nitrogen. Biol. Fert. Soils 51, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-014-0948-1 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bulgarelli, D. et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11336 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Southey, J. in Laboratory methods for work with plants and soil nematodes (ed JF Southey) 42–44 (HMSO, 1986).

  70. Ladner, D. C., Tchounwou, P. B. & Lawrence, G. W. Evaluation of the effect of ecologic on root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, and tomato plant, Lycopersicon esculenum. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 5, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph5020104 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Niu, D.-D. et al. Application of PSX biocontrol preparation confers root-knot nematode management and increased fruit quality in tomato under field conditions. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 26, 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2015.1085489.18 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucl. Acids Res. 41, e1–e1. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks808 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Buee, M. et al. 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. New Phytol. 184, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03003.x (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rösch, C., Mergel, A. & Bothe, H. Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3818–3829. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.3818-3829.2002 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Throbäck, I. N., Enwall, K., Jarvis, Å. & Hallin, S. Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 49, 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.011 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Parks, D. H., Tyson, G. W., Hugenholtz, P. & Beiko, R. G. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30, 3123–3124. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.: ZR2021MC085), Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Project (Major Scientific and Technological Innovation) (Grant No.: 2019JZZY010718), Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Project (International Scientific and Technology Cooperation) (Grant No.: 2019GHZ033), and the International Scientific and Technology Cooperation Project of Shandong Academy of Sciences (Grant No.: 2019GHPY05). We gratefully acknowledge the supports from National Belt and Road Innovative Talent Exchange Foreign Expert Program (No. DL2021024001L), Shandong Provincial Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs (No. G20190123008), the Department of Trade, Tourism and Investment of the South Australian Government, and the University of Adelaide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.W. (Yuanzheng Wu) and H.Y. conceived the experiments, M.L., Y.W. (Yilian Wang) and Y.W. (Yuanzheng Wu) conducted the experiments, J.H., Y.W. (Yanli Wei) and J.L. performed the data analysis, J.P. and Y.Z. discussed the results and drafted the manuscript, M.R., R.T. and M.D.D. reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuanzheng Wu or Hetong Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Philp, J., Wang, Y. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inhibits root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community. Sci Rep 12, 8381 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12472-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12472-2

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing