Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) or prickly pear cochineal, is the most damaging pest on cactus species with heavy economic losses worldwide. The efficacy of two Moroccan EPN isolates; Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) (applied at 25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2) against D. opuntiae nymphs and young females were evaluated under both laboratory bioassays and field conditions. Results showed that S. feltiae was more effective, causing higher mortality of nymphs and adult females (98.8% and 97.5%, respectively) after 8 days of exposure, resulting in an LT50 value of 5.9 days (nymph) and 6.0 days (young female). While, H. bacteriophora had lower mortalities (83.8% for nymph and 81.3% for adult females). For the cochineal nymphs and adult females, no significant difference was observed among S. feltiae at 25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2, and the positive control, d-limonene applied at 0.5 g/L which was used due to its high effectiveness against nymphs and females of D. opuntiae. In the field experiment, d-limonene at 0.5 g/L and S. feltiae applied at 75 IJs cm−2 were effective in reducing nymph and adult female populations by 85.3–93.9% at 12 days of post exposure period. To our knowledge, this work is the first report on the use of EPNs to control D. opuntiae. Thus, in addition to d-limonene, both Moroccan EPN isolates S. feltiae, and H. bacteriophora could be used as part of the integrated pest management strategy against D. opuntiae. Many factors such as temperature can affect the establishment and effectiveness of EPNs under field conditions. Therefore, additional studies under field conditions are needed.
Native to Mexico, the cactus cochineal Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae), is an invasive pest of prickly pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae) and other Opuntia species in the Americas, Asia, Europe, and Africa1,2. In 2014, D. opuntiae was detected for the first time in Morocco3. Both nymphs and female adults stages of D. opundiae feed directly and permanently on the host plant's elaborate sap causing chlorosis and premature dropping of cladodes and fruits4. Severe infestations of up to 50% of the cladode surface can in some time lead to the death of the plant5,6. In Brazil, the damage caused by D. opuntiae on O. ficus indica and other Opuntia species used as forage resulted in the loss of 100,000 ha, valued at $25 US million7. Similarly, in Mexico, the damage caused by this pest is severe, the premature drop of fruits and young cladodes has resulted in lower yields and higher production costs for Mexican cactus crops8. Since its first detection in Morocco, the introduced D. opuntiae has caused enormous damage in several areas of cactus production in the country where prickly pear cactus plays an essential role in the ecological system, preventing desertification and preserving biodiversity9. Dactylopius opuntiae establish and spread more easily than many other scale insect species due to the waxy coating on their dorsal side which protects them from exposition to contact insecticides, high reproductive rate, and the propensity to spread quickly through natural carriers such as plant products, wind, water, rain, birds, human, and farm animals10. Dactylopius opuntiae females have three biological developmental stages—egg, nymph (two instars), and adult—whereas males have egg, nymph (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th), pre-pupa, pupa, and adult11. For male the moults to the third, fourth and fifth (nymph) instars take place in the cocoon, but the successive exuviae are extruded from the posterior end of the cocoon, indicating when the moult has occurred11. Datylopius opuntiae has high fecundity rate (on average 150–160 eggs) with total incubation period < 1 day8. The average developmental time for D. opuntiae crawler from egg to first moult is 14.92 days, the mean duration of the female from egg to the commencement of oviposition is 84 days11. The duration of the second instar from the first moult to the commencement of pupation averaged 11.2 days10. The pupal period lasted approximately 10 days, at the end of which emerged a red, white-winged male11,12. The adult male is short lived, usually dies within 3–5 days after its emergence and does not consume during this period of life11. The life cycle of D. opuntiae varies from 90 to 136 days depending on the environmental conditions, especially the temperature (the cycle duration is short in high temperatures)12. They also seem to be able to become dormant on inert material over the period of time under unfavorable conditions11.
Dactylopius opuntiae is controlled mainly by organophosphate and neonicotinoids insecticides8, which can have harmful effects on human and animal health13, the environment14, and in some cases limit international trade in cactus plants among the countries interested in cactus cultivation, including Morocco4. Therefore, to reduce insecticide use, many alternative management strategies have been explored in many countries, such as the use of mineral oils, resistant genotypes, detergents, plant extracts, mycoinsecticides, and biological control agents (Predators)4,15,16.
The Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex alone has been used in Brazil to control D. opuntiae17 or in combination with natural extracts of Ricinus communis L. and Poincianella pyramidalis (Tul.) L.P. Queiroz, and results are promising18. A key point for the use of these fungi in IPM is the molecular characterization of the genetic profiles of F. incarnatum-equiseti strains, as there are considerable differences in efficacy as biological control agents among the biotypes collected in the field17,19. Several species of predators (insects and spiders) are associated with D. opuntiae and some can control it, but to date, no parasitoids have been found associated with D. opuntiae. To prevent the spread of the D. opuntiae in Morocco, the Ministry of Agriculture, Maritime Fisheries, Rural Development and Water and Forests, implemented a major emergency plan for the control of this scale pest in 2016. This plan also included a research program covering the most important management components such as biopesticides20, beneficial insects21,22,23, and host plant resistance9. Five botanical extracts and one detergent were tested for the control of nymphs and adult females of D. opuntiae in laboratory bioassays and under field conditions in Morocco. The results show that the use of biodegradable products, black soap at 60 g/l in double application or in combination with Capsicum annuum L. extract at 200 g/l, could be incorporated into the management program for the control of D. opuntiae as a safe alternative to chemical insecticides20. Also, after the detection of D. opuntiae in Morocco, investigations were carried out in different areas of cactus production in order to find biological control agents that could be used as predators against D. opuntiae. Fourteen predators were found associated with D. opuntiae and identified22. Hyperaspis campestris (Herbst, 1783) was found to be the most important species associated with D. opuntiae in Morocco22. It is important to note that the varietal resistance of cactus to D. opuntiae, was the relevant and saving solution currently exists in Morocco. The eight cactus varieties identified as resistant to D. opuntiae by research in Morocco, will constitute a solid base for the launching of the national program of recovery of decimated cactus throughout the country9. Since the body of D. opuntiae is covered by wax that makes it hard to be controlled by the use of chemical and botanical sprays, therefore, biological control seems to be promising alternative control strategies24 than insecticides. Within biological control, entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) of the families Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae are obligate pathogens of insects25, associated with specific symbiotic bacteria belonging to the genera Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus respectively26. The life cycle of EPN consists of four stages, egg, juvenile (four stages), adult, and the 3rd juvenile infective stage27. Regarding the mode of action of EPNs, the infective juveniles enter the host body and release their bacteria, and subsequently the insect dies within 48 h after infection28,29. EPNs complete 1–3 generations in a single host and when the necessary resources are depleted, the IJs leave the host and forage for a new situable host27. The developmental duration and reproduction of EPNs depends on host quality, however, information on their host searching behavior under field conditions is quite scarce in the literature30. The host-seeking behavior of EPNs has been classified into two categories: cruisers (active seekers) and ambushers (sit-and-wait foragers)31,32. Crusaders, such as H. bacteriophora, are highly mobile and active31,32, with an ability to orient themselves based on long-range volatile signals33,34 and an ability to find sedentary subterranean hosts34. On the other hand, ambushers, such as Steinernema carpocapsae Weiser (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), have low mobility31,32, an ability to nest or stand32, and a lack of response to long-range volatile signals33,34. But some species, such as S. feltiae, do not nest like ambushers32 and do not respond to long-range volatile host signals in a manner similar to cruisers34. EPNs are very promising biocontrol agents showing high potential for the management of many harmful pests of different crops including scale pests35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45. Several strains of Steinernema feltiae and Heterorhabditus bacteriophora native to Morocco have been identified46,47,48. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of these native EPN isolates, isolated from Moroccan soils, has not been evaluated against D. opuntiae. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of two indigenous EPNs in controlling nymphs and adult females of D. opuntiae under laboratory and field conditions.
The Moroccan EPN isolates S. feltiae and H. bacteriophora were evaluated for their pathogenicity against D. opuntiae nymphs and adult females based on their infectivity rates. The tested EPN species at different concentrations were significantly different in their pathogenicity against nymphs (Fig. 1) and adults female of D. opuntiae (Fig. 2). The greatest 8-days nymph cumulative mortality (96.3–100%) was achieved by d-limonene applied at 0.5 g/L, and S. feltiae at 25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2 (Findex = 33.30, df = 6; 56, P < 0.0001). At the end of the experiment, nymph cumulative mortality for H. bacteriophora at high concentration (75 IJs cm−2) reached 83.8%.
At 8 days after treatment, the greatest adult mortality was achieved by d-limonene at 0.5 g/L (100%), and S. feltiae at 25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2 (95.0–97.5%) (Findex = 33.3, df = 6; 56, P < 0.0001). (Findex = 31.9, df = 6; 56, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the percentage mortality caused by H. bacteriophora at 50 and 75 IJs cm−2. The lowest percentage of adult female mortality observed at 8 days after treatment was achieved by H. bacteriophora at 25 IJs cm−2 (72.5%). The pathogenic efficacy of all nematodes tested against D. opuntiae nymph increased as the exposure period increased. The largest increase, from day 1 to day 8 post-treatment, was seen between d-limonene and S. feltiae at the concentration of 75 IJs cm−2. The experimental data are presented in Fig. 3.
During the first day after treatment, D. opuntiae nymph mortality at the highest concentration showed a 40% variant for both d-limonene and S. feltiae. The same mortality rates (40%) were displayed in H. bacteriophora, but at day 4 after treatment. Maximum mortality was recorded after 8 days by both d-limonene (100%) and S. feltiae (98.8%) (Fig. 3A).
For the concentration of 50 IJs cm−2. At 24 h post-treatment, the highest nymphal mortality was achieved by d-limonene (42.5%) followed by S. feltiae (32.5%), whereas 2 days are required for H. bacteriophora to kill the same number of insects (32.5%). After 8 days post-treatment, d-limonene and S. feltiae reached 100% and 97.5% mortality, respectively, while H. bacteriophora reached 78.8% mortality (Fig. 3B).
The lowest percentage of nymphal mortality was observed at the concentration of 25 IJs cm−2 (Fig. 3C). At 24 h post-treatment, the highest nymphal mortality was achieved by S. feltiae (28.8%), whereas 4 days are required for H. bacteriophora to kill the same number of scale insects (28.8%). After 8 days post-treatment, d-limonene and S. feltiae reached 100% and 96.3% mortality, respectively, while H. bacteriophora reached 75% mortality (Fig. 3C).
A significant difference in nematodes pathogenicity against adult’s female was also observed among treatments (Fig. 4). At the highest concentration (75 IJs cm−2), the highest mortality percentages at 24 h were observed among adult’s female exposed to d-limonene (40%) and S. feltiae (35%), whereas 2 days are required for H. bacteriophora to kill the same number of scale insects (35%). Steinernema feltiae and H. bacteriophora reached mortality of 97.5% and 81.3%, respectively, at the 8 th day post-infection (Fig. 4A). At the concentration of 50 IJs cm−2, mortality was achieved 30% on day 3 and 96.3% on day 8 by S. feltiae. Two days are required for H. bacteriophora to kill the same number of insects (30%). After 8 days post-treatment, H. bacteriophora reached 77.5% mortality of D. opuntiae adult females (Fig. 5B). Low mortality was observed at the concentration of 25 IJs cm−2 (Fig. 4C). With the exception of S. feltiae, which killed 25% and 95% of the insects tested at days 1 and 8 post-treatment, respectively; H. bacteriophora achieved 15% mortality at day 1 and 26.3%, 42.5%, 72.5%, respectively, at days 4, 6, and 8 post-infections.
The susceptibility of D. opuntiae to a particular nematode species and concentration is one of the major factors determining LC50 levels. The concentrations required to induce 50% mortality of D. opuntiae nymphs and young females under the effect of S. feltiae and H. bacteriophora are shown in Table 1. The Probit analysis used to analyze the mortality results showed that S. feltiae had the lowest median lethal concentration value, whereas H. bacteriophora had the highest (Table 1).
The concentration required to induce 50% mortality of D. opuntiae nymphs and young females for the two EPN isolates tested at low, medium, and high concentrations are shown in Fig. 5A,B (nymph) and Fig. 6A,B (young female). One-way ANOVA analysis shows that mean mortality was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected by exposure of D. opuntiae insects to different concentrations of EPN suspensions. Insects exposed during the period from 1 to 8 days after treatment to the highest concentration (75 IJs cm−2), exhibited a significantly higher mortality rate.
The mean survival time (LT50) of D. opuntiae nymphs (Fig. 7A) and young females (Fig. 8A) exposed to selected nematodes with a concentration of 75 IJs cm−2 ranged from a minimum of 5.9 to a maximum of 6.2 days and from a minimum of 6.2 to a maximum of 6.4 days, respectively (Table 2). The survival curves for all treatments were different by the Kaplan–Meier method (P < 0.05). Pearson's chi-square statistical test (all P values < 0.05) indicated that the data did not fit the regression models according to Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon), where χ2 = 4.25, df = 1, sig = 0.039 (nymph) and χ2 = 3.86, df = 1, sig = 0.05 (young female).
Lethal survival time analysis of D. opuntiae nymphs and young females exposed to the control and selected nematodes with concentration 50 IJs cm−2 did not indicate any significant difference between mortality times (Table 3). The survival curves for treatments with the 50 IJs cm−2 concentration were different by the Kaplan–Meier method (P < 0.05). Pearson's chi-square statistical test for nymphs (all P values > 0.05) (Fig. 7B) indicated that the data fit the regression models, where χ2 = 3.28, df = 1, sig = 0.07 and concerning young females (Fig. 8B) χ2 = 4.56, df = 1, sig = 0.033 according to Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon). Likewise, with the 25 IJs cm−2 concentration, no significant difference was observed between the mortality times (Table 4). As for the other concentrations tested, the survival curves for the treatments with 25 IJs cm−2 concentration were different by the Kaplan–Meier method (P < 0.05) but the Pearson chi-square statistical test (all P values > 0.05) indicated that the data fit the regression models for the young females (Fig. 8C), where χ2 = 1.92, df = 1, sig = 0.16 whereas for the nymphs (Fig. 7C) χ2 = 5.29, df = 1, sig = 0.021 according to Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon).
At 3 DAT, fewest nymphs were recorded in cactus plants treated with d-limonene at 0.5 g/L, and S. feltiae at 75 IJs cm−2 (Findex = 375.0, df = 7; 64, P < 0.0001) (Table 5). The numbers of nymphs in plants treated with d-limonene at 0.5 g/L, S. feltiae at 75 IJs cm−2, and H. bacteriophora at 75 IJs cm−2 were significantly reduced at 6 DAT (Findex = 796.5, df = 7; 64, P < 0.0001). At 12 DAT, nymphs density in control plants increased to 180 individuals but was significantly lower in all other treatments, with fewest scale pests in plants treated with d-limonene at 0.5 g/L, S. feltiae at 75 IJs cm−2 and H. bacteriophora at 75 IJs cm−2 (Findex = 3797.6, df = 7; 64, P < 0.0001). In general, d-limonene at 0.5 g/L, and S. feltiae at 75 IJs cm−2 were effective at reducing nymphs numbers, with over 90% reductions at 12 DAT when compared to the control (tap water) (Table 6) (Findex = 123.2, df = 6; 56, P < 0.0001).
d-limonene at 0.5 g/L, and S. feltiae at 75 IJs cm−2 significantly reduced young females densities in the treated cactus plants at 3 DAT (Findex = 319.2, df = 7; 64, P < 0.0001) (Table 7). Also, no significant difference was observed between S. feltiae 75 IJs cm−2 and H. bacteriophora 75 IJs cm−2 at 3 DAT.
While young females alive densities in the control plants increased over time, those in plants treated with the above treatments remained very low throughout the experiment (6 DAT: Findex = 605.6, df = 7; 64, P < 0.0001; 12 DAT: Findex = 3899.5, df = 7; 64, P < 0.0001). fewest young female alive was found at 6 and 12 DAT in plants treated with d-limonene at 0.5 g/L, and S. feltiae at 75 IJs cm−2. The greater reduction rate of young females at 12 DAT was observed in cactus plants treated with d-limonene at 0.5 g/L, and S. feltiae at 75 IJs cm−2 (Findex = 152.4, df = 6; 56, P < 0.0001) (Table 6).
In the current study, the pathogencity of two native EPN isolates collected from Morocco was evaluated against D. opuntiae nymphs and adult females, a major threat to cactus production in Morocco under laboratory and field conditions. In laboratory bioassays, the effectiveness of the application of EPNs in the management of D. opuntiae was evaluated by considering concentrations and time required for the EPN to kill the host. Our results indicated that S. feltiae was the most virulent EPN species against D. opuntiae. This EPN at the maximum dose tested (75 IJs cm−2) caused the highest mortality of nymphs and adult females after 8 days of exposure which resulted in an LT50 value of 5.9 days (nymph) and 6 days (young female), whereas H. bacteriophora had the lowest mortalities. Also, a color change in nematode-invaded insects is generally observed for many insect genera25, in this study, the scale pests turn dark brown when infected by the two EPN species tested.
These results corroborate those of a previous study by Gorgadze et al.49 in which it was reported that the pathogenicity and virulence of an introduced species of Steinernema and H. bacteriophora induced mortality rates of 73% in nymphs and 56.5% in adults of brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Steinernema feltiae and H. bacteriophora were also tested together against cabbage weevil, Rhytidoderes plicatus Oliv. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) larvae, and caused 100% mortality in laboratory experiments50, being more effective than in the present study. The virulence of the two species of EPN was also evaluated on many other pests including onion thrips Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) and tobacco thrips Frankniella fusca (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)27,41,42. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora was the most virulent against sugarcane spittlebugs, Aeneolamia varia (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), causing 76% mortality to the insect51. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora is reported to be virulent (40–86% mortality) against adults of sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata (Say) (Hemiptera: Tingidae)52. Higher pathogenicity of S. feltiae than H. bacteriophora against the olive fruit fly larva, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae), was reported by Sirjani et al.53. The strains S. feltiae-SF-MOR10, S. feltiae-SF-MOR9, and H. bacteriophora-HB-MOR7 showed significantly higher infectivity (77–80% mortality) and penetration rates against mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) under laboratory and glasshouse conditions48. Greater virulence of H. bacteriophora (VS strain) and S. feltiae (SN strain) were observed against peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) and oriental fruit fly B. dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae)45. Several studies have reported the sensitivity of several scale pest species to EPN. Guide et al.54 demonstrated the virulence of isolates from the genera Heterorhabditis and Steinernema against the coffee root scale Dysmicoccus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Heterorhabditis zealandica and Steinernema yirgalemense were found to be the most effective candidates for the control of vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus and citrus mealybug, P. citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)38,55. These differences in nematode pathogenicity may be due to several factors including the specificity of different isolates for different hosts, their efficiency in reaching the host, penetration ability, and its killing efficacy56.
In this trial, both isolates tested were found to be pathogenic to nymphs and young females of D. opuntiae and their efficacy increased with an increase in concentration. Rahoo et al.57 reported that the control of any selected pest by EPN is related to the nematode inoculum concentration, as higher concentrations increase the chance of infections and, therefore, mortality rates. However, we observed that at concentrations of 25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2 mortality was almost similar at 8 DAT in the S. feltiae isolate treatment, suggesting that in this isolate treatment, concentrations above 25 IJs cm−2 may cause intraspecific competition among nematodes. Selvan et al.58 and Gaugler et al.59 have pointed out that a minimum density of IJs can circumvent the immune system of the host, to invade and eventually kill it. On the other hand, very high concentrations of EPNs can induce intraspecific competition between nematodes, which reduces their efficiency as biological control agents60.
The persistence of entomopathogens in the environment is an important attribute of biological control programs, and some studies have demonstrated the high persistence of several EPN species under field conditions54,61. In the field experiments, d-limonene applied at 0.5 g/L and S. feltiae applied at 75 IJs cm−2 treatments were effective in reducing the numbers of nymphs and adults of the D. opuntiae. The numbers of D. opuntiae decreased throughout the experiment in the treated plants. Steinernema feltiae applied at 75 IJs cm−2 significantly reduced the number of adults and nymphs under field trials to less than 20 after 12 DAT. There were also small but significant reductions of D. opuntiae adults and nymphs in S. feltiae applied at 25 and 50 IJs cm−2, and H. bacteriophora applied at 75 IJs cm−2 (88.6–81.4%) at 12 DAT. Due to low persistent and slow action, H. bacteriophora must be applied repeatedly when it is used at low concentrations (authors, personal observations).
Differences in the D. opuntiae mortality rates among the EPN species tested could be attributed to the foraging strategy of IJs, as well as the behavior of D. opuntiae. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora have a cruising strategy30 while S. feltiae exhibits an intermediate foraging strategy62. Also, Bastidas et al.63, reported that infection by EPN could be restricted in insects less than 5 mm in length. Studies that used small hemipteran species such as Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and woolly aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) reported that the largest stages (1.9–3.0 mm) were more susceptible to EPNs with 38% and 78% mortality, respectively than the smallest stages (0.6–1.2 mm) with 0% and 22% mortality, respectively64,65. But for silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), this trend was not observed66. These last authors reported second instar nymph mortality rates ranging from 75 to 90%, being the most sensitive life stage than the adult stage for both Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and S. feltiae despite its small size (0.8 mm). In our study, S. feltiae, at the highest dose, caused 98.8% and 97.5% mortality of nymphs and breeding young females of D. opuntiae, respectively. Therefore, the small size of these nymphs (0.70–2.25 mm) and adult females (1.98–3 mm) is not a significant limiting factor for their susceptibility to S. feltiae.
For both, nymphs and adult females of D. opuntiae, no significant difference was observed among S. feltiae at 25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2 and the botanical insecticide, d-limonene applied at 0.5 g/L which was used as a positive control, due to their known toxicity against different stages of D. opuntiae and which had high mortality for both nymphs and adult females of D. opuntiae21, indicating the acceptability of S. feltiae as a potential biological control agent against D. opuntiae. No previous research has yet been conducted on the control of D. opuntiae with EPNs. The compatibility of the use of EPNs and botanical insecticides such as d-limonene in an integrated pest management program against D. opuntiae merits to be investigated. In this sense, three agrochemicals and two biocontrol product formulations were found to be compatible with Heterorhabditis zealandica and tend to be used in citrus IPM programs67. Further studies on the use of adjuvants to improve control with EPN should be performed. Van Niekerk and Malan68 showed that the addition of adjuvants prevents nematode desiccation, as well as promotes application deposits on the leaf surface and that merit further evaluation in protect-and-kill strategies in fields that could complement other IPM strategies to improve the management of D. opuntiae. Many other biological factors, only some of which were discussed in this study, may affect the final selection of a nematode species or isolate for control of D. opuntiae under field conditions. In addition, several environmental factors such as temperature may affect the establishment and pathogenic potential of nematodes under field conditions. Therefore, additional studies using other nematode species and isolates under laboratory and field conditions are needed.
Material and methods
The cochineal rearing
The D. opuntia was collected from a colony housed at the Entomology Laboratory of the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA-Morocco) and used in the trials. Dactylopius opuntia were reared according to Aldama-Aguilera and LlanderalCazares method69 in cladodes of O. ficus-indica collected from the fields in Zemamra, Morocco (32°37′48″ N, 8°42′0″ W) to obtain enough numbers. Each cladode was staked at the basal end with a wooden stake, left to heal for 48 h under laboratory conditions, and then suspended vertically from metal grids in entomological cages (80 cm3) consisting of a metal frame covered with mesh fabric to allow ventilation. Dactylopius opuntiae gravid females (n = 10) were isolated from infested cladodes and placed in an open wax paper bag (8 cm2). Each bag was then attached to the top of each cladode, the remaining cladodes were placed horizontally to support nymphs that were not initially on the vertical cladodes. Infested cladodes were kept in entomologic`al cages (80 cm3) under controlled conditions at 26 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 10% relative humidity (RH), and a photoperiod of 12:12 h (Light:Dark) regime.
Source of Entomopathogenic nematodes
Two EPN species, Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) (SF-MOR10 strain) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) (HB-MOR8 strain) recently isolated from soil in Morocco (for more information see also Mokrini et al.48) were evaluated against D. opuntia. EPN isolates were reared at 25 °C according to the methodology described by Kaya and Stock70, using the last instar larvae of greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Dead larvae of G. mellonella were placed on white traps71,72. Harvested infective juveniles (IJs) were maintained in tap water in tissue culture flask at 8 °C and used within 12 days after harvest.
The pathogenicity of both EPN strains was investigated against D. opuntiae nymphs and adult females under laboratory conditions. The trials were carried out in plastic Petri dishes (14.5 cm diameter) (Globalroll) lined with a circular filter paper disc (smooth Sartorius™ quality 3-HW). Ten D. opuntiae nymphs (Trial 1) and ten adult females (Trial 2) were transferred to each Petri dish. In both trials, one ml of each EPN species was applied via pipette at the rates of 25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2 (4126, 8252, and 12,387 dish−1 respectively). Petri dishes were arranged in a completely randomized design (CRD) with 4 replications. The control Petri dishes received tap water only without the addition of EPNs. Limocide (60 g d-limonene per L; applied at 0.5 g/L; Vivagro, Martillac, France) diluted in tap water was used as a positive control. This botanical insecticide was served as a positive control treatment because of its known toxicity against different stages of D. opuntiae21. d-limonene (60 g/L), had high mortality against both nymphs and adult females (90.28% and 91.94% mortality, 120 h after treatment respectively) of D. opuntiae under field conditions. In addition, the botanical insecticide dose used in the present study was sublethal, as it did not cause short-term mortality to the potential predator of D. opuntiae, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) (Coccinellidae: Scymninae)21. Numbers of alive and dead scale insects were recorded at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 days after application. The dead insects were observed under binocular loupe (SFC-11, MOTIC®) for the presence EPNs inside the cadavers. To ensure the reproducibility of results, all experiments were independently repeated twice over time (two full trials with 8 replicates total).
All experiments were conducted under similar conditions of 26 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 10% RH, and a photoperiod of 12:12 h (Light:Dark) at room temperature. The mean body weights and sizes of D. opuntiae nymphs and adults used in the studies were 3.8 ± 0.5 mg and 0.7–1.6 mm, respectively (nymphs) and 5.2 ± 0.2 mg and 1.98–2.25 mm, respectively (young adults females).
Field trial was carried out in an O. ficus-indica area in the experimental field station (32°15′ to 33°15′ N, 7°55′ to 9°15′ W) at the INRA Settat (National Institute of Agricultural Research), Morocco, during the 2020–2021 growing season. This trial was conducted on a half-hectare plot planted with 200 cladodes (1-year-old) of O. ficus-indica, susceptible to D. opuntiae. The collected cladodes of O. ficus-indica used in the experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the Moroccan Agriculture Ministry. The cladodes were planted in normal polarity in completely randomized rows (1 m between rows, with a spacing of 0.5 m between plants), and were grown until they reached the stage of three to five cladodes. The plot had a total of 15 rows and each row had 13 plants. The plants were irrigated as needed. It should be noted that this experiment was installed in an environment of cactus hedges completely infested or even devastated by the cochineal D. opuntiae.
The plants were infested with 1-day-old first instar nymphs of D. opuntiae that were allowed to settle in before being adjusted to appropriate densities. To standardize treatments and replicates, only 150 nymphs and 150 young females identified with the help of a hand-held magnifying glass were retained on the plants; additional nymphs and adults were removed using a needle21.
The same EPN strains tested in the laboratory bioassays at different concentrations were evaluated in the field experiment using the same concentrations (25, 50, and 75 IJs cm−2). There were eight treatments (five plants were treated by each treatment). The EPNs and d-limonene solutions were applied using a laboratory sprayer (Burkard Scientific Ltd, Uxbridge, UK) to ensure complete coverage. Nematodes were applied in 500 ml of tap water in a 0.5 m2 area around the base of each plant. Plants were examined with a hand-held magnifying glass, 1 day before treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 days after treatment (DAT), and the number of alive D. opuntiae was counted. Five plants per treatment were considered as a replicate, and four replicates were conducted for all treatments, arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). This trial was repeated twice over different time.
The rate of population reduction at each sampling date was calculated by the Henderson-Tilton formula73:
where T1 and T2 are respectively the numbers of insects alive on the treated plant before treatment and on a specific sampling date after treatment, while C1 and C2 are the numbers of insects alive in a control plant before treatment and on a specific sampling date after treatment, respectively.
The mortality percentage data for each treatment in the laboratory bioassays were corrected using the Abbott formula74. The corrected mortality percentage data were subjected to ANOVA and means were separated using Tukey's LSD test (α = 0.05).
The probit analysis method was established to determine the lethal concentration (LC50) for the different treatments using IBM SPSS 23.0 software. Mortality data were transformed into probits, while concentrations were transformed into Probit log10 (dose). Before analysis, LC50 values were predicted from the probit lines. The method of Finney75 was used to determine the lethal time (LT50) of the probit analysis. Calculation of the lethal concentration (LC) and its 95% confidence limits (CL) was performed based on accurate estimation of log (CL) variances76. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis technique was used to describe both, the median lethal time (LT50) (the number of days until 50% of the insects were dead, for each treatment) and the mean survival time (SPSS 23.0).
One-way ANOVA test was performed to examine differences between doses and exposure times using the SPSS 23.0 package at the levels of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01. Significant differences between variables were checked using Tukey's LSD test.
The numbers of adults and nymphs alive, and rates of population reduction in the different treatments in the field experiment were subjected to ANOVA under RCBD, and means were separated by Tukey's LSD test. All tests were performed using SPSS 23.0 software77. In all experiments, treatment was considered a fixed effect, and replicate was considered a random factor.
Spodek, M., Ben-Dov, Y., Protasov, A., Carvalho, C. J. & Mendel, Z. First record of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Dactylopiidae) from Israel. Phytoparasitica 42(3), 377–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-013-0373-2 (2014).
García Morales, M., Denno, B. D., Miller, D. R., Miller, G. L., Ben-Dov, Y. & Hardy, N. B. ScaleNet: a literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematic (2016).
Bouharroud, R., Amarraque, A. & Qessaoui, R. First report of the Opuntia cochineal scale Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in Morocco. EPPO Bull. 46(2), 308–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12298 (2016).
Vanegas-Rico, J. M. et al. Biology and life history of Hyperaspis trifurcata feeding on Dactylopius opuntiae. Biocontrol 61(6), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9753-0 (2016).
Mann, J. Cactus-feeding insects and mites. Bull. US. Nat. Mus. 256, 1–15 (1969).
Vanegas-Rico, J. M. et al. Hyperaspis trifurcata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and its parasitoids in Central Mexico. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 41(2), 194–199 (2015).
Lopes, E. B., Albuquerque, I. C., Brito, C. H. & Batista, J. D. L. Velocidade de dispersão de dactylopius opuntiae em palma gigante (opuntia fícus-indica). Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 6(2), 644–649 (2009).
Badii, M. H. & Flores, A. E. Prickly pear cacti pests and their control in Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 84, 503–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/3496379 (2001).
Sbaghi, M., Bouharroud, R., Boujghagh, M. & El Bouhssini, M. Sources de résistance d’Opuntia spp. contre la cochenille à carmin, Dactylopius opuntiae, au Maroc. EPPO Bull. 49(3), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12606 (2019).
Khan, H. A. A., Sayyed, A. H., Akram, W., Razald, S. & Ali, M. Predatory potential of Chrysoperla carnea and Cryptolaemus montrouzieri larvae on different stages of the mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis: A threat to cotton in South Asia. J. Insect. Sci. 12(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.14701 (2012).
El Aalaoui, M., Bouharroud, R., Sbaghi, M., El Bouhssini, M. & Hilali, L. Seasonal biology of Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) on Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae) under field and semi-field conditions in Morocco. Ponte. 1, 259–327. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2020.1.17 (2020).
Flores, A., Olvera, H., Rodríguez, S. & Barranco, J. Predation potential of Chilocorus cacti (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to the prickly pear cacti pest Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 42(4), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0139-z (2013).
Galloway, T. & Handy, R. Immunotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides. Ecotoxicology 12(1), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022579416322 (2003).
Arias-Estévez, M. et al. The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 123(4), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.011 (2008).
Palacios-Mendoza, C., Nieto-Hernández, R., Llanderal-Cázares, C. & González-Hernández, H. Efectividad biológica de productos biodegradables para el control de la cochinilla silvestre Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Dactylopiidae). Acta. Zool. Mex. 20(3), 99–106 (2004).
Borges, L. R. et al. Use of biodegradable products for the control of Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in cactus pear. Acta. Hortic. 995, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.995.49 (2013).
Carneiro-Leão, M. P., Tiago, P. V., Medeiros, L. V., da Costa, A. F. & de Oliveira, N. T. Dactylopius opuntiae: Control by the Fusarium incarnatum–equiseti species complex and confirmation of mortality by DNA fingerprinting. J. Pest. Sci. 90(3), 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0841-4 (2017).
da Silva Santos, A. C., Oliveira, R. L. S., da Costa, A. F., Tiago, P. V. & de Oliveira, N. T. Controlling Dactylopius opuntiae with Fusarium incarnatum–equiseti species complex and extracts of Ricinus communis and Poincianella pyramidalis. J. Pest. Sci. 89(2), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0689-4 (2016).
Tiago, P. V. et al. Polymorphisms in entomopathogenic fusaria based on inter simple sequence repeats. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 26(10), 1401–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2016.1210084 (2016).
Ramdani, C., Bouharroud, R., Sbaghi, M., Mesfioui, A. & El Bouhssini, M. Field and laboratory evaluations of different botanical insecticides for the control of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) on cactus pear in Morocco. Int. J. Trop. Insect. Sci. 41(2), 1623–1632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00363-w (2021).
El-Aalaoui, M. et al. Comparative toxicity of different chemical and biological insecticides against the scale insect Dactylopius opuntiae and their side effects on the predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Prot. 52(1–2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2019.1589909 (2019).
El-Aalaoui, M., Bouharroud, R., Sbaghi, M., El Bouhssini, M. & Hilali, L. Predatory potential of eleven native Moroccan adult ladybird species on different stages of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell)(Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). EPPO Bull. 49(2), 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12565 (2019).
El-Aalaoui, M., Bouharroud, R., Sbaghi, M., El Bouhssini, M. & Hilali, L. First study of the biology of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and its potential to feed on the mealybug Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) under laboratory conditions in Morocco. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Prot. 52(13–14), 1112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2019.1691904 (2019).
Lester, P. J., Thistlewood, H. M. A. & Harmsen, R. Some effects of pre-release host-plant on the biological control of Panonychus ulmi by the predatory mite Amblyseius fallacis. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006345119387 (2000).
Poinar, G. O. Description and biology of a new insect parasitic rhabditoid, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora n. Gen., n. Sp. (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae n. Fam.). Nematol. 21(4), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529275X00239 (1976).
Boemare, N., Akhurst, R. & Mourant, R. DNA relatedness between Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae), symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes, and a proposal to transfer Xenorhabdus luminescens to a new genus, Photorhabdus gen-nov.. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43(2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-43-2-249 (1993).
Gulzar, S., Wakil, W. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Potential use of entomopathogenic nematodes against the soil dwelling stages of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman: Laboratory, greenhouse and field trials. Biol. Control. 161, 104677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104677 (2021).
Adams, B. J. & Nguyen, K. B. Taxonomy and systematics. In Entomopathogenic Nematology (ed. Gaugler, R.) 1–34 (CABI Publishing, 2002).
Dowds, B. C. A. & Peters, A. Virulence mechanisms. In Entomopathogenic Nematology (ed. Gaugler, R.) 79–90 (CABI Publishing, 2003).
Bal, H. K. & Grewal, P. S. Lateral dispersal and foraging behavior of entomopathogenic nematodes in the absence and presence of mobile and non-mobile hosts. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0129887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129887 (2015).
Lewis, E. E., Gaugler, R. & Harrison, R. Entomopathogenic nematode host finding—response to host contact cues by cruise and ambush foragers. Parasitology 105, 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000074230 (1992).
Campbell, J. F. & Gaugler, R. Nictation behavior and its ecological implications in the host search strategies of entomopathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae). Behaviour 126, 155–169 (1993).
Lewis, E. E., Gaugler, R. & Harrison, R. Response of cruiser and ambusher entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae) to host volatile cues. Can. J. Zool. 71, 765–769 (1993).
Grewal, P. S., Lewis, E. E., Gaugler, R. & Campbell, J. F. Host finding behavior as a predictor of foraging strategy in entomopathogenic nematodes. Parasitology 108, 207–215 (1994).
Poinar, G. O. Biology and taxonomy of Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae. In Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Biological cOntrol (eds Gaugler, R. & Kaya, H. K.) 23–62 (CRC Press, 1990).
De Waal, J. Y., Wolhlfarter, M. & Malan, A. P. Laboratory bioassays for the differential susceptibility of Planococcus ficus and Pseudococcus viburni (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) to entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae). S. Afr. J. Plant. Soil. 24, 243–244 (2007).
Lacey, L. A. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Microbial control of insect pests in temperate orchard systems: Potential for incorporation into IPM. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093419 (2008).
Van Niekerk, S. & Malan, A. P. Potential of South African entomopathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae) for control of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Pseudococcidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 111(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2012.07.023 (2012).
Půža, V. Control of insect pests by entomopathogenic nematodes. In Principles of Plant Microbe Interactions (ed. Lugtenberg, B.) 175–183 (Springer, 2015).
Gulzar, S. et al. Environmental tolerance of entomopathogenic nematodes differs among nematodes arising from host cadavers versus aqueous suspension. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 175, 107452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107452 (2020).
Gulzar, S. et al. Virulence of entomopathogenic nematodes to pupae of Frankliniella fusca (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 114(5), 2018–2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toab132 (2021).
Gulzar, S., Wakil, W. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Combined effect of entomopathogens against Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): laboratory, greenhouse and field trials. Insects 12(5), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050456 (2021).
Usman, M. et al. Virulence of entomopathogenic fungi to Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) and interactions with entomopathogenic nematodes. J. Econ. Entomol. 113(6), 2627–2633. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa209 (2020).
Usman, M. et al. Potential of entomopathogenic nematodes against the pupal stage of the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Nematol. 52, e2020–e2079. https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2020-079 (2020).
Usman, M., Wakil, W. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Entomopathogenic nematodes as biological control agent against Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biol. Control. 163, 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104706 (2021).
Grewal, P. S., Wang, X. & Taylor, R. A. J. Dauer juvenile longevity and stress tolerance in natural populations of entomopathogenic nematodes: Is there a relationship?. Int. J. Parasitol. 32(6), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00029-2 (2002).
Benseddik, Y. et al. Occurrence and distribution of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) in Morocco. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 30(10), 1060–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1787344 (2020).
Mokrini, F. et al. Potential of Moroccan entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76170-7 (2020).
Gorgadze, O., Bakhtadze, G., Kereselidze, M. & Lortkipanidze, M. The efficacy of entomopathogenic agents against Halyomorpha halys. Int. J. Curr. Res. 9, 62177–62180 (2017).
Tarasco, E. & Triggiani, O. Use of Italian EPNs in controlling Rhytidoderes plicatus Oliv, (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in potted savoy cabbages. IOBC. WPRS. Bull. OILBN. 28, 9–12 (2005).
Moreno Salguero, C. A., Bustillo Pardey, A. E., Lopez Nunez, J. C., Castro Valderrama, U. & Ramirez Sanchez, G. D. Virulence of entomopathogenic nematodes to control Aeneolamia varia (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) in sugarcane. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 38(2), 260–265 (2012).
Julià, I., Morton, A., Roca, M. & Garcia-del-Pino, F. Evaluation of three entomopathogenic nematode species against nymphs and adults of the sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata. Biocontrol 65(5), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-020-10045-8 (2020).
Sirjani, F. O., Lewis, E. E. & Kaya, H. K. Evaluation of entomopathogenic nematodes against the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biol. Control. 48, 274–7280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.11.002 (2009).
Guide, B. A., Soares, E. A., Itimura, C. R. & Alves, V. S. Entomopathogenic nematodes in the control of cassava root mealybug Dysmicoccus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 42(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v42i1.6664 (2016).
Le Vieux, P. D. & Malan, A. P. The potential use of entomopathogenic nematodes to control Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). S. J. Enol. Vitic. 34(2), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.21548/34-2-1108 (2013).
Lewis, E. D., Campbell, J., Griffin, C., Kaya, H. & Peters, A. Behavioral ecology of entomopathogenic nematodes. Biol. Control. 38(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.11.007 (2006).
Rahoo, A. M., Tariq Mukhta, T., Gowen, S. R., Rahoo, R. K. & Abro, S. A. Reproductive potential and host searching ability of entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae. Pak. J. Zool. 49(1), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.1.229.234 (2017).
Selvan, S., Campbell, J. F. & Gaugler, R. Density-dependent effects on entomopathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae) within an insect host. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 62(3), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1993.1113 (1993).
Gaugler, R., Wang, Y. & Campbell, J. F. Aggressive and evasive behaviors in Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae: Defences against entomopathogenic nematode attack. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 64(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00222011(94)90150-3 (1994).
Burjanadze, M., Kharabadze, N. & Chkhidze, N. Testing local isolates of entomopathogenic microorganisms against brown marmorated stink Bug Halyomorpha halys in Georgia. BIO Web Conf. 18, 00006. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20201800006 (2020).
Del Valle, E. E., Dolinski, C. & Souza, R. M. Dispersal of Heterorhabditis baujardi LPP7 (Nematoda: Rhabditida) applied to the soil as infected host cadavers. Int. J. Pest. Manag. 54(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870701660579 (2008).
Griffin, C. T., Boemare, N. E. & Lewis, E. E. Biology and behavior. In Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents 1st edn (eds Grewal, P. S. et al.) 47–59 (CABI Publishing, 2005).
Bastidas, B., Portillo, E. & San-Blas, E. Size does matter: The life cycle of Steinernema spp. in micro-insect hosts. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 121, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2014.06.010 (2014).
Stokwe, N. F. & Malan, A. P. Susceptibility of the obscure mealybug, Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) (Pseudococcidae), to South African isolates of entomopathogenic nematodes. Int. J. Pest. Manag. 62(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2015.1122250 (2016).
Stokwe, N. F. & Malan, A. P. Laboratory bioassays to determine susceptibility of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), to entomopathogenic nematodes. Afr. Entomol. 25(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.025.0123 (2017).
Cuthbertson, A. G. et al. Bemisia tabaci: The current situation in the UK and the prospect of developing strategies for eradication using entomopathogens. Insect Sci. 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01383.x (2011).
Van Niekerk, S. & Malan, A. P. Compatibility of Heterorhabditis zealandica and Steinernema yirgalemense with agrochemicals and biological control agents. Afr. Entomol. 22, 49–56 (2014).
Van Niekerk, S. & Malan, A. P. Adjuvants to improve aerial control of the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) using entomopathogenic nematodes. J. Helminthol. 89(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X13000771 (2015).
Aldama-Aguilera, C. & Llanderal-Cázares, C. Grana cochinilla: comparación de métodos de producción en penca cortada. Agrociencia 37(1), 11–19 (2003).
Kaya, H. K. & Stock, S. P. Techniques in insect nematology. In Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology, Biological Techniques Series (ed. Lacey, L. A.) 281–324 (Academic Press, 1997).
White, C. F. A method for obtaining infective larvae from culture. Science 66, 302–303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.66.1709.302-a (1927).
Shapiro-Ilan, D. I., Morales-Ramos, J. A. & Rojas, M. G. In vivo production of entomopathogenic nematodes. In Microbial-Based Biopesticides 137–158 (Humana Press, 2016).
Henderson, C. F. & Tilton, E. W. Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. J. Econ. Entomol. 48(2), 157–161 (1955).
Abbot, W. S. Method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18(2), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/18.2.265a (1925).
Finney, D. J. Probit analysis 3rd edn, 20–63 (Cambridge University Press, 1971).
Haye, T., Wyniger, D. & Gariepy, T. D. Recent range expansion of brown marmorated stink bug in Europe. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Urban Pests (eds Müller, G. et al.) 309–314 (OOK Press, 2014).
Carver, R. H. & Nash, J. G. Doing data analysis with SPSS: version 18.0. (Cengage Learning, 2011).
The research of this study was supported by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), Morocco. We are grateful to Benseddik youneess for his invaluable assistance in completing this work.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
El Aalaoui, M., Mokrini, F., Dababat, A.A. et al. Moroccan entomopathogenic nematodes as potential biocontrol agents against Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). Sci Rep 12, 7590 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11709-4