Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tuning riboflavin derivatives for photodynamic inactivation of pathogens

Abstract

The development of effective pathogen reduction strategies is required due to the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria and zoonotic viral pandemics. Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) of bacteria and viruses is a potent reduction strategy that bypasses typical resistance mechanisms. Naturally occurring riboflavin has been widely used in PDI applications due to efficient light-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) release. By rational design of its core structure to alter (photo)physical properties, we obtained derivatives capable of outperforming riboflavin’s visible light-induced PDI against E. coli and a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate, revealing functional group dependency for each pathogen. Bacterial PDI was influenced mainly by guanidino substitution, whereas viral PDI increased through bromination of the flavin. These observations were related to enhanced uptake and ROS-specific nucleic acid cleavage mechanisms. Trends in the derivatives’ toxicity towards human fibroblast cells were also investigated to assess viable therapeutic derivatives and help guide further design of PDI agents to combat pathogenic organisms.

Introduction

Riboflavin and its derivatives, flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) are organic cofactors found within enzymes involved in numerous biochemical pathways1,2. Due to their rich redox chemistry and ability to mediate a wide range of both oxidative and reductive organic transformations, flavin-containing enzymes are prominently used as biocatalysts3,4. Flavins are also involved in the regulation of photochemical pathways due to strong blue light absorption, which results in the generation of highly oxidising excited states that can elicit biological signalling events or responses5,6,7,8. This photoexcitation process has been exploited in a number of photocatalytic applications, whereby modification of the flavin chromophore can enable the formation of high potential oxidative and reductive intermediates to afford useful synthetic methodology9,10,11.

Another application in which photoexcitation is utilised to generate reactive intermediates is within photodynamic inactivation (PDI) of pathogens. In this technique, a photosensitiser (PS) such as riboflavin, is employed to generate a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the vicinity of a particular pathogen in order to cause irreversible damage that leads to inactivation12,13. Due to the rapid onset and non-specificity of PS-induced ROS release, conventional mechanisms of pathogen resistance through specific efflux pumps or detoxification pathways can be avoided14. Therefore, PDI of pathogens is a versatile and effective strategy that has the potential to help combat increasing antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains14,15, and ongoing zoonotic viral pandemics16.

Mechanistically, PDI of a pathogen is initiated by excitation of a PS with a suitable wavelength of light (hνex) which generates an excited singlet state (S1). This excited state can either fluoresce (hνem) back to its ground state (S0) or undergo intersystem crossing (ISC) to an excited triplet state (T1), typically characterised by a longer lifetime (Fig. 1). This excited triplet state PS can interact with substrate such as an amino acid residue or nucleobase to form an oxidised substrate and reduced PS that subsequently reduces oxygen to superoxide (O2•-) (Type I reaction, Fig. 1)17. Superoxide is produced under oxidative stress naturally and is an important factor of cell signalling pathways. Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells contain superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes in order to mitigate superoxide’s cytotoxic effects17. Other types of ROS can be formed in Type I reactions such as H2O2 and hydroxyl radicals (OH), however catalase and glutathione can neutralise these species respectively17.

Figure 1
figure 1

Mechanism of photosensitised reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation that enables inactivation of pathogens. ISC = intersystem crossing, Sub = substrate, SOD = superoxide dismutase.

Type II reactions lead to the formation of singlet oxygen (1O2), a highly cytotoxic ROS that non-selectively oxidises biomolecules such as nucleic acids, proteins and lipids in order to inactivate the pathogen17. Singlet oxygen formation occurs through the interaction of the excited triplet state PS with ground state triplet oxygen (3O2, Fig. 1). The efficiency of the light absorption that leads to this event can be quantified through the measurement of the singlet oxygen quantum yield (ФΔ). Effective defence mechanisms against singlet oxygen have not evolved within non-photosynthetic microorganisms, hence it is considered key to PDI of bacterial and viral pathogens12,13,18.

Due to its excellent photosensitising properties, abundance and lack of toxicity, riboflavin has several applications within blood product sterilisation in combination with ultraviolet (UV) light for effective PDI of pathogens prior to transfusion19,20. More recently, it was shown to inactivate coronaviruses such as MERS and SARS-CoV-221,22,23. Similarly, it has been reported that riboflavin and FMN can inactivate bacteria24, cancer cells25 and parasites26 using either UV or blue (440–460 nm) light. Despite such promising studies, the design of flavin derivatives to understand structure–activity relationships towards PDI applications has not been explored, unlike prominent photosensitisers such as porphyrins27. Previously, it was shown that functionalisation of flavins with amino groups, which introduce positive charge, can enhance PDI against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria as well as endospores28,29. In general, cationic groups are known to improve the efficacy of PDI by coordination of the molecule to negatively charged phospholipid membranes. However, charge is not the only factor that contributes to the efficiency of PDI. For example, lipophilic flavin derivatives bearing multiple acetyl ester moieties have been shown to improve the efficacy against the Leishmania major parasite over analogous cationic equivalents, highlighting the importance of the cell membrane permeability26.

By considering the mechanism of PDI, as well as the biochemical structure of pathogens, we report the rational design of flavin derivatives (F1-4, Fig. 2a) for pathogen inactivation. The prepared flavins demonstrate high efficacy and rapid inactivation of two model pathogens, a Gram-negative bacterium, E. coli BL21(DE3), and, murine hepatitis virus A59 strain (MHV-A59)30 often used as a surrogate for study of other coronaviruses such as SARS-Cov-2 despite the differences in transmission path, under white light irradiation (400–700 nm). In addition, the toxicity of the derivatives towards human fibroblast cells (WI-38) is explored, revealing that clear structure–activity relationships can be observed relating to the functionality of derivatives.

Figure 2
figure 2

The structures and photophysical spectra of F1-4. (a) Structures of flavins F1-4 (counteranions = TFA-), (b) UV–Vis absorption (bold) and emission (dashed) spectra of F1-4 in DMSO.

Results

Synthesis and characterisation of flavins

Flavins F1-4 (2A) were prepared according to Schemes S1 and S2 (see ESI). Inspired by the classical amphiflavins developed by Trissel, Schmidt and Hemmerich31,32,33, we chose to include an alkyl chain (C8) within the structure to improve phospholipid membrane incorporation. Additionally, the flavin chromophore itself was substituted with bromo groups in the case of F3-4 in order to harness the heavy-atom effect that increases the rate of ISC from singlet to triplet excited states, thereby potentially enhancing photosensitised generation of singlet oxygen34. Heavy atom substitution has been shown to improve both the rate of ISC and the singlet oxygen quantum yield (ФΔ) in flavin derivatives used for synthetic photooxidation reactions35. Although the heavy-atom effect has been used to boost photodynamic efficacy for other PS dyes in PDI applications, it has not yet been explored for flavin derivatives 36.

To afford both methylated (F1-2) and brominated derivatives (F3-4), a Boc-protected ethylene amino component was first installed to the methylated or brominated arene core prior to cyclisation of the isoalloxazine ring system. Following N3-alkylation with an octyl chain on the isoalloxazine, N-Boc protecting groups were removed to yield the amino-functionalised F1 or F3 that were subsequently converted to guanidino moieties to achieve F2 or F4 respectively (Fig. 2a). Guanidino groups were chosen as they are known to increase membrane coordination and penetration through strong guanidinium-phosphate H-bonding and we hypothesised would enhance PDI efficacy.

The UV–Vis absorption spectra of the flavins in DMSO revealed very similar absorption properties at the λ1 (S0 → S1) band but a blue shift of 10–13 nm for the higher energy λ2 (S0 → S2) bands of the brominated compounds (F3 and F4) presumably due to the electron withdrawing effect of Br atoms (Fig. 2b, Table 1, Table S1). In terms of emission properties, the heavy-atom effect of bromination can be clearly observed with F3 and F4 exhibiting severely reduced emission intensity (ФF < 2% in DMSO, Table 1) when compared to the methylated F1 and F2F = 13% and 14% respectively in DMSO, Table 1). This effect can also be observed when comparing the efficiency of 1O2 production upon excitation, where brominated F3 and F4 demonstrate up to a 30% increase in activity over the methylated F1 and F2 in MeCN (Table 1), indicating their potential to be potent photodynamic agents. Despite this, F1 and F2 are still efficient 1O2 photosensitisers comparable with riboflavin (ФΔ = 0.54 ± 0.07). However, a smaller ФΔ value for guanidinylated F4 (62%) is observed compared to aminated F3 (85%) which could be explained by fast reverse ISC and/or solvent-dependent aggregation.

Table 1 Photophysical properties of flavins F1-4. λn = S0 → Sn absorption band, λem = emission wavelength, φF = fluorescence quantum yield, φΔ = singlet oxygen quantum yield.

After successful synthesis and initial characterisation, we monitored the photostability of the compounds in PBS (1x, pH 7.4) which was used for PDI assays as distilled or ultrapure water destabilises bacterial cells and coronaviruses through osmotic pressures37,38, thereby augmenting inactivation results. Flavins F1-4 and riboflavin (100 µM in PBS) were therefore irradiated with a 6200 K white LED light source (18 W, 400–700 nm, see ESI Figure S1 for emission spectrum) at an illuminance of 1 × 105 lx (35 mW/cm2 irradiance) to resemble typical daylight 39, and the changes in their UV–Vis absorption were monitored over time (see ESI, Figure S4). For riboflavin, rapid photodecomposition (80%) was observed over 30 min irradiation which is known to be due to intramolecular dealkylation of the ribityl chain (Figure S4a,b). This yields lumichrome as the major degradation product which can only act as a PS under UV-irradiation40. Amino-containing F1 and F3 exhibited around 40% and 60% degradation respectively after the same irradiation time (Figure S4a,c,e), whereas F2 and F4 degraded by approximately 10% and 30% respectively (Figure S4a,d,f.). These findings corroborate previous work showing photodegradation of amino-containing flavins in the presence of phosphate ions, which resulted in diminished bacterial PDI efficiency41. However, it appears that guanidino substitution in our case improves the photostability. Interestingly, bromo-substituted flavins show higher rates of photodegradation, which could be explained by their higher ФΔ values resulting in greater 1O2-induced degradation.

Photodynamic inactivation of E. coli

Having observed clear trends in the photophysical properties of methylated and brominated derivatives, we were interested to see how this would affect the PDI efficacy of F1-4 against pathogens. First, we investigated the inactivation of the Gram-negative bacterium, E. coli BL21(DE3). The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria presents a formidable barrier to antimicrobial compounds that consequently inhibits PDI efficacy compared to the analogous structure in Gram-positive bacteria42. Following an initial 20 min incubation of the flavin compounds with E. coli in PBS at various concentrations in the dark, the mixture was irradiated (1 × 105 lx) and the number of surviving colony forming units (CFUs) were determined. After 15 min (31.5 J/cm2 light dose) of irradiation, no inactivation was observed at 1 µM for either riboflavin or F1-4. At 10 µM approximately 1 log10 reduction of E. coli CFUs was observed for F2 and a 2.8 log10 reduction in the presence of F4 (Fig. 3a, Table S2). At higher concentrations, this effect was greatly enhanced with both F2 and F4 exhibiting > 6.0 log10 reduction of CFU/mL at 100 µM which is considered a highest level of decontamination according to EMA guidance43.

Figure 3
figure 3

Photodynamic inactivation of E. coli. (a) Photodynamic inactivation of E. coli BL21(DE3) incubated with various concentrations of flavins irradiated with white LED light (1 × 105 lx, 35 mW/cm2) for 15 min in PBS containing 0.5% DMSO. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. Significance levels are defined compared to PBS control as the following: * for p ≤ 0.05, ** for p ≤ 0.01, *** for p < 0.001, and **** for p < 0.0001 (b) Time course of E. coli inactivation incubated with 100 µM of flavin irradiated with white LED light (1 × 105 lx, 35 mW/cm2) for 15 min in PBS containing 0.5% DMSO. Data are expressed as the mean ± RE of three biological replicates. (c) SIM images depicting the localisation of flavins in E. coli after incubation with 100 µM flavin. (d) Agarose gel electrophoresis of pDNA (pUC18) following incubation with 10 µM flavin irradiated with white LED light (1 × 105 lx, 35 mW/cm2) for 15 min in PBS containing 0.1% DMSO. Rbf = Riboflavin. Uncropped gels can be found in ESI (Figure S9).

Interestingly, riboflavin and F1 demonstrated no activity at 100 µM, whereas F3 exhibited a 1.8 log10 reduction in bacterial load. To ensure effective PDI was occurring, the flavin compounds were incubated in the dark under the same experimental irradiation conditions (100 µM, 15 min) to reveal no bacterial toxicity (see ESI, Figure S5). The rate of E. coli inactivation over time was then monitored at a 100 µM flavin concentration revealing an extremely rapid reduction of CFUs in the presence of F4, facilitating > 6.0 log10 reduction after just 5 min of irradiation (10.5 J/cm2 light dose). Similarly, F2 shows effective bactericidal activity with a 3.4 log10 reduction (> 99.9%) after 5 min irradiation. A closer investigation into the speed of F4’s activity at 100 µM showed that after only 1 min of irradiation (2.10 J/cm2 light dose) a 4.1 log10 reduction (> 99.99%) of bacteria was achieved (Fig. 3b).

These data clearly show that the introduction of a guanidino moiety, as in the case of F2 and F4, greatly increases the flavin’s PDI efficacy against the bacterium when compared to amino-containing F1 and F3. This may be attributed to improved photostability in PBS, as well as the guanidino group facilitating better coordination to the cytoplasmic phospholipid membrane resulting in improved permeability and lipid peroxidation under irradiation44. In addition, the replacement of methyl substituents with bromines improves efficacy when the same cationic group is compared. This can be explained by more efficient generation of singlet oxygen, as predicted by their ФΔ values shown in Table 1. As a result, greater lipid and biomolecule oxidation can be achieved to inactivate the pathogen. It should also be noted that the inclusion of bromine atoms increases the lipophilicity of the molecule which can further improve cell membrane permeability and incorporation. However, despite having the highest predicted ФΔ value (85%), F3 did not outperform F2Δ = 55%) which demonstrates the overarching impact of guanidino substitution.

To gain initial mechanistic insight, we investigated the cellular localisation of fluorescent riboflavin, F1 and F2 by structured illumination microscopy (SIM) (Fig. 3c, see ESI Figures S6,, S7, S8). After incubation with the flavin compounds (100 µM), large field of view images revealed marked differences in the number and degree of fluorescent bacterial populations (see ESI Figures S6, S7, S8). Although the exact quantification of flavin uptake was not possible due to uncharacterised optical properties in a complex biological environment, the qualitative comparison of F2 and F1 (which have similar ФF in DMSO), revealed a higher number of fluorescent bacteria with bright fluorescent intensity after incubation with F2, especially within membranes (Fig. 3c, Figure S6 and S7). In addition, two subpopulations of bacteria can be observed, one in which intense flavin fluorescence is seen in the cell envelope and in the cytosolic space, and one in which fluorescence is seen only in the cell envelope and not in the cytosolic space. We believe that the existence of these two subpopulations indicate a level of cytosolic uptake in some cells. Although bacterial membranes serve as an excellent barrier for uptake of extracellular compounds, it is plausible that produced singlet oxygen might damage the integrity of bacterial envelope easing the penetration of flavin compounds. It can also be observed that guanidino substitution seems to lead to an enhanced uptake in comparison with other compounds. However, the distribution of fluorescent intensity was not homogeneous across different bacterial cells which could be related to the amphiphilicity of F2, resulting in variable uptake due to aggregation (Figure S6). For hydrophilic riboflavin, very weak fluorescent populations were observed, most likely explained by the controlled transport of the compound through outer membrane porins of the bacterium and therefore unable to bind effectively to the outer or cytoplasmic membranes (Fig. 3c, Figure S8). This therefore helps to explain the lack of PDI efficacy observed when using riboflavin.

Enhanced PDI efficacy of flavins that seem to be taken up into the cytosol can be explained by their ability to interact with biomolecules within the cell, such as nucleic acid. To test this hypothesis, we monitored the pDNA (pUC18) cleavage in the presence of the flavins (10 μM) under irradiation, which indicated guanidino derivatives possess superior photocleavage ability (Fig. 3d). The photocleavage of supercoiled (SC) to nicked coiled (NC) pDNA structures was significantly enhanced for F2 and F4 (39% and 21% respectively) when compared to F1 and F3 (≤ 3%) after irradiation for 15 min (Fig. 3d). This difference in activity could be explained by favourable guanidinium-phosphate interactions that increase the likelihood of electron transfer events between flavin and guanosine, which are known to primarily contribute to DNA cleavage alongside 1O2-mediated oxidation45,46. As a consequence, even if amino-flavin compounds were able to diffuse into the cytoplasm, it is unlikely that they will cause damage of the constituent nucleic acids. Our control compound, riboflavin also exhibits photocleavage of the plasmid (11%) which has been reported previously45,46. However our SIM data indicate that, due to its hydrophilic nature and lack of cationic substituent, riboflavin does not bind readily to bacterial cells resulting in limited PDI.

Collectively, this initial mechanistic study demonstrates that even in the case of increased singlet oxygen production, the key component to achieve effective Gram-negative bactericidal activity under irradiation is the presence of the guanidino group, which facilitates cell uptake and nucleic acid degradation. It should be noted, that although considered to be a powerful super resolution cross-sectional microscopy, SIM alone cannot be used as a conclusive evidence for cytoplasmic and additional strategies should be employed. However, the combination of distinct populations of bacteria in presence of different flavins in combination with enhanced DNA cleavage of guanidino compounds, speaks of at least some level of uptake.

Photodynamic inactivation of murine hepatitis virus (MHV-A59)

Encouraged by the identification of such highly effective guanidino-flavins for bacterial inactivation, we were interested to see if the trend would be similar for coronaviruses, specifically, the coronavirus surrogate, murine hepatitis virus A59 strain (MHV-A59)30. It has already been demonstrated that riboflavin can effectively inactivate both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses in blood products using UV light21,22,23, but much lower efficacy was observed using visible light (0.4 × 105 lx, 0.5–2 h) against hepatitis B virus (HBV)47,48. In order to evaluate possible applicability towards virus-inactivating surface coatings or textiles, we used an in vitro TCID50 assay to evaluate the viral titre of MHV-A59 through inoculation into murine fibroblast 17Cl-1 cells after irradiation at varying concentrations of flavin in PBS. The cytotoxicity of the flavins towards this cell line was first investigated by 24 h incubation MTS assay allowing us to obtain a working concentration range of ≤ 10 μM for the in vitro TCID50 assay to evaluate viral PDI efficacy (see ESI Figures S11 and Table S4 for 17Cl-1 cytotoxicity data).

We started our investigation by varying the concentration of flavin (1–10 μM in PBS) with 10 min of white LED exposure (21.0 J/cm2 light dose, Fig. 4a). Even at 1 μM, the brominated guanidino flavin F4 demonstrated a 3.4 log10 reduction in viral titre, while F2 and F3 showed 2.1 log10 reduction (Fig. 4a, Table S3). It should be noted that reductions of the order of 4 logs or more (> 99.99%) are considered highly effective by EMA guidance and that a > 1 log10 reduction in necessary to be considered reliable49. At the same concentration, riboflavin achieved a 1.2 log10 reduction in titre, however F1 showed no effect under these conditions. Nevertheless, the activity of all flavins improved by the increase of their concentrations resulting in viral load reductions of > 99.9% in the presence of riboflavin or F2, and > 99.99% with F3 or F4 at 5 μM. Further increase in concentration (to 10 µM) only substantially improved virucidal activity for F4 (> 5 log10). The irradiation time was then explored for 10 μM flavin to reveal high degrees of inactivation (≥ 5 log10) for F2, F3 and F4 when irradiated for 15 min (31.5 J/cm2 light dose) whereas shorter irradiation times (5 min, 10.5 J/cm2 light dose) still provided efficient inactivation of MHV-A59 ≥ 3 log10 steps using those same flavins (Fig. 4b). It should be noted that variability within all experiments was noticeably high which is typical for TCID50 assays50. However, no reliable log reduction of MHV-A59 was observed when irradiated without flavin in PBS containing 0.1% DMSO (Fig. 4b). To confirm that the mechanism of viral inactivation by the flavins was dependent on light, dark control experiments (10 μM, 10 min incubation) resulted in no effective virucidal activity being observed (> 1 log10 reduction, Fig. 4c).

Figure 4
figure 4

Photodynamic inactivation of murine hepatitis virus (MHV-A59). (a) Photodynamic inactivation of murine hepatitis virus A59 strain (MHV-A59) incubated with various concentrations of flavins irradiated with white LED light (1 × 105 lx, 35 mW/cm2) for 10 min in PBS containing 0.1% DMSO. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. (b) Time course of MHV-A59 inactivation incubated with 10 µM of flavin irradiated with white LED light (1 × 105 lx, 35 mW/cm2) for 15 min in PBS containing 0.1% DMSO. Data are expressed as the mean ± RE of three biological replicates. (c) Photodynamic inactivation of MHV-A59 incubated with 10 µM of flavin compound irradiated with white LED light (1 × 105 lx, 35 mW/cm2) or incubated in the dark for 10 min in PBS containing 0.1% DMSO. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. (d) Agarose gel electrophoresis of ssRNA following incubation with 10 µM flavin irradiated with white LED light (1 × 105 lx, 35 mW/cm2) for 15 min in PBS containing 0.1% DMSO. Rbf = Riboflavin. Uncropped gel electrophoresis image is shown in ESI Figure S10.

The activity of the flavin derivatives towards viral inactivation show a different trend than previously observed with our model bacterium. For example, in the presence of riboflavin under the same conditions, effective PDI of MHV-A59 was measured whereas there was no activity towards E. coli. Therefore, it can be assumed that the requirements for a PS to interact and/or diffuse through the coronavirus membrane are less dependent on lipophilicity or the presence of cationic charge. Despite this, our flavin derivatives again show that guanidino group incorporation improves antiviral PDI activity when compared to amino groups. However, bromination now seems to play a more important role in viral deactivation as brominated amino F3 outperformed methylated guanidino F2.

To try and explain our findings, we investigated the interaction of the flavins with RNA to elucidate how its light-induced cleavage could lead to coronavirus inactivation, a model ssRNA (~ 1 k nt) was irradiated (1 × 105 lx) in the presence of 10 µM flavin in PBS for 15 min and the extent of cleavage was observed via agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 4d). It was observed that F1 exhibits the least RNA photocleavage (12%) whereas riboflavin shows greater activity (28%) which corroborates the result of viral inactivation and confirms previous findings51,52,53. Similar to our results with pDNA, guanidino-containing F2 and F4 show the best photocleavage ability (46% and 42% respectively). Interestingly, F3 also exhibits effective cleavage of RNA (35%) which was not observed in the case of pDNA (Fig. 3d). This can be rationalised by the mechanism of flavin-mediated RNA photocleavage which has been previously shown to depend more upon 1O2 oxidation than electron transfer events between flavin and nucleobase51,52,53. Taken together, it can be concluded that efficient 1O2 production is key to viral PDI using flavin derivatives.

In vitro toxicity towards human cells

Finally, before considering the applications of our flavin derivatives for PDI of topical pathogen infections, surface coatings or textiles, we investigated their impact on human cells. In general, an ideal photosensitiser for these applications should show no cytotoxic effects on human cells in the dark and limited effects given the same irradiation conditions used for inactivation of the target pathogen, also referred to as a therapeutic window12. Accordingly, the inherent cytotoxicity of the flavins was evaluated through incubation with human lung fibroblast cells (WI-38). A 24 h MTS assay was used to calculate inhibitory concentration values (IC50) of > 100 µM for riboflavin and guanidino-functionalised F2 and F4 which can therefore be considered as non-toxic (Fig. 5a, Table S4). On the other hand, amino-functionalised F1 and F3 had IC50 values of 96.1 µM and 30.9 µM respectively (Table S4). It has been shown previously that the cytotoxicity of amino-containing compounds may be derived from an increase in intracellular amine oxidase activity that induces excess oxidative stress leading to cell apoptosis54.

Figure 5
figure 5

In vitro toxicity of F1-4 towards human cells. (a) In vitro cytotoxicity effect of F1–4 and riboflavin on WI-38 cells after 24 h incubation determined by MTS assay. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. (b) Light-induced toxicity of WI-38 cells treated with F1F4 and riboflavin (10 µM) irradiated for 0–15 min with 1 × 105 lx white LED light. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. Control = 0.1% DMSO in PBS.

We then studied the light-induced toxicity of the flavins towards the WI-38 fibroblast cells by observing decreases in cell viability over irradiation time using an MTS assay (Fig. 5b). Interestingly, the cytotoxicity trends observed in the dark after 24 h are reversed when exposed to light (1 × 105 lx) over shorter time periods. For example, after 15 min of irradiation, 10 μM of methylated guanidino F2 induces ~ 75% reduction in cell viability. Under the same conditions, brominated guanidino F4 exhibits less of an effect with ~ 20% reduction in cell viability. The degree of variability in these experiments could be attributed to the amphiphilic nature of the flavins leading to aggregation of the compounds in aqueous conditions. On the other hand, riboflavin, amino-functionalised F1 and F3 display no decrease in cell viability over 15 min irradiation. These data show that despite being non-toxic to the cells in the dark, the guanidino-functionalised flavins can induce cytotoxicity upon irradiation most likely through similar mechanisms discussed for pathogens. It is our ongoing work to understand the differences in light induced cytotoxicity that were observed between methylated and brominated guanidino flavin derivatives. Nevertheless, F4 could be suitable for further PDI applications thanks to effective bacterial and viral inactivation (> 3 log10 reduction after 15 min irradiation at 11 μM and 1 μM respectively) coupled with low toxicity to human fibroblast cells under the same conditions or in the dark.

Conclusion

In summary, we have rationally designed small library of flavin derivatives containing functional groups that significantly improve visible light photodynamic inactivation of pathogens. By incorporating a guanidino moiety into the flavin structure (F2 and F4), the inactivation efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli BL21(DE3) in PBS, was remarkably enhanced compared to natural riboflavin and amino variants (F1 and F3). We believe that this can be explained by enhanced cell uptake of these compounds and subsequent pDNA cleavage. Bromination of the structure (F3 and F4) enhanced singlet oxygen production via the heavy-atom effect which generally led to improved PDI of E. coli, however the incorporation of a guanidino substituent dominated the outcome. Very effective inactivation was achieved with F4, whereby 1 min of visible irradiation (2.10 J/cm2 light dose) reduced the bacterial load by > 4 log10 steps.

It was found that the presence of guanidino group does not enhance the selectivity of the compounds in case of PDI of SARSCoV-2 surrogate, MHV-A59 when evaluating the PDI against the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate, MHV-A59 in PBS. Rather, the bigger effect is exerted by presence of bromo substituents; brominated amino F3 had a higher effiecenty compared to methylated guanidino F2 compound, which can be attributed to more significant 1O2-mediated RNA cleavage. This was evidenced by brominated amino F3 having a higher efficacy compared to methylated guanidino F2 which was attributed to greater RNA cleavage via 1O2 oxidation. The highest viral PDI was achieved by F4 where > 4 log10 reduction in titre was achieved after 10 min of visible irradiation (21.0 J/cm2 light dose) in the presence of 5 μM compound. Toxicity studies using the novel flavins towards human fibroblast cells (WI-38) further confirmed that F4 could be a suitable candidate for PDI applications against both bacteria and viruses.

Overall, we hope this study inspires further exploration of riboflavin’s structure to design new generations of photosensitiser compounds to treat topical bacterial infections, enabling the design of antiviral surface coatings, sprayable hybrid materials to provide the surface protection, as well as fabrics capable of efficient visible light pathogen inactivation. Such fabrics could be used to manufacture protecting suits for medical staff, as well as curtains and bedding used in intensive care units where the sterile conditions are of the outmost importance.

Methods

Synthesis and characterisation of flavins

Detailed experimental methods of synthesis and characterisation of flavins can be found in the Supplementary Information.

Photodynamic inactivation of E. coli

An adapted method reported by Maisch et al. was used to evaluate the phototoxicity of flavin compounds towards E. coli BL21(DE3)28.

After an overnight aerobic culture in LB broth at 37 °C with shaking at 225 rpm, the resulting E. coli were centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in PBS (Sigma, 1x, pH 7.4) to an OD600 value of 0.6 (~ 1 × 108 bacteria per ml). Bacterial solutions were then combined with varying concentrations of F1-4 and riboflavin (0, 1, 10, 100 μM) dissolved in PBS in a 1:1 ratio and left to incubate for 20 min in dark. Aliquots of negative controls (0.5% DMSO in PBS; PBS only) and 100 μM flavin-bacteria samples were covered in foil to remain in dark, while all samples were plated onto a 96-well plate and exposed to white LED irradiation (1 × 105 lx) for 15 min. After 15 min of irradiation or darkness, each sample was serially diluted to its respective, appropriate dilution and plated onto an LB agar plate with 50 μg/mL kanamycin. Plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C in the dark. Survival of bacteria was determined by counting colony forming units (CFUs) the next day.

For time point data, aliquots of 100 μM flavin-bacteria solutions were taken at 5-min increments of irradiation (0, 5, 10, and 15 min) and evaluated similarly as above. Time point experiment with one-minute increments, between 0 and 5 min, were conducted for 100 μM F4-bacteria samples.

All data was generated with technical replicates and biological triplicates.

All statistical analysis was done with Graphpad Prism 9. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, was performed to evaluate the impact of flavin concentration compared to the control (PBS). Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test, was performed to evaluate the impact of light given the same flavin concentration with different irradiation conditions (dark and light). Significance levels are defined as the following: ns for p > 0.05, * for p ≤ 0.05, ** for p ≤ 0.01, *** for p < 0.001, and **** for p < 0.0001.

Photodynamic inactivation of murine hepatitis virus (MHV-A59)

Cell culture

17Cl-1 murine fibroblasts cells and murine hepatitis virus A59 strain (MHV-A59) were kindly gifted by Professor Ian Goodfellow’s lab (Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, UK). 17Cl-1 cells were resurrected from cold-storage cell banks and propagated using routine cell culture protocols in complete growth medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium low glucose 1 g/L (DMEM, Life Technologies) supplemented with 5% foetal bovine serum (Merck), 6% tryptose phosphate broth (Merck), 1 × non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1 × antibiotic–antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1 × L-Glutamine (Gibco). 17Cl-1 cells were seeded (100 μl per well) into 96-well plates (untreated, flat bottom) at 1 × 104 cells/well at 37 °C for 24 h in 5% CO2 prior to the day of testing.

Virus propagation

MHV-A59 was propagated in 17Cl-1 cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 TCID50 per cell. MHV-A59 was clarified by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min and stored in aliquots at − 80 °C. The TCID50 was calculated using the Reed and Muench method55.

Flavin treatment of MHV-A59

The efficacy of the flavins were enumerated utilizing modified methods from ISO 18,184 and Leibowitz et al.56 Flavins F1-4 and riboflavin, were solubilized in DMSO. 100 µM working stock solutions were then created by diluting each DMSO solution into PBS. To control for the effect of DMSO on MHV-A59, DMSO was diluted into PBS at the same concentration. A white light apparatus was set up to cover a 4 × 5 (row x column) area of a 96-well plate with the same level of light intensity (1 × 105 lx). The stock solutions were then diluted in replicates of four to a total of 180 µl in PBS at 1, 5, and 10 µM concentrations for each sample. Virus stocks of MHV-A59 were thawed on ice prior to use. 20 µl of MHV-A59 stock (1.4 × 109 PFU/ml) was then mixed into each well, and the 4 × 5 well matrix was treated with the light or incubated in the dark at room temperature for a specified time (5, 10, or 15 min).

Virus recovery and TCID50 Assay MHV-A59

After treatment, the samples were mixed into 320 µl of Gibco Difco™ Beef Extract (1.5% w/v beef extract in ddH2O; Life Technologies) and rolled for 15 min to chelate any free ions in the solution. The samples then were serially diluted (100–10–7) in infectivity media (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium low glucose 1 g/L (DMEM, Life Technologies) supplemented with 2.5% fetal bovine serum (Merck), 3% tryptose phosphate broth (Merck), 1 × non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1 × antibiotic–antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1 × L-Glutamine (Gibco]) and added in triplicate to 17Cl-1 cell plates. For each sample or control there were 4 replicate treatments (in light or dark); each treatment replicate was plated in triplicate. Infected 17Cl-1 plates were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h. Plates were scored for cytopathic effect (CPE) by microscopy and viral titres were determined by the Reed and Muench 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) end point method55. Outliers were removed from the four replicates using an outlier test. The full protocol was repeated in triplicate on different days to account for any variability in the assay.

Nucleic acid photocleavage

General procedure: Riboflavin or flavin F1-4 (10 µM from DMSO stock solutions) were mixed with either pUC18 DNA (Thermo Scientific, 0.50 µg) or EGFP-encoding mRNA (~ 1 k nt) as the ssRNA model (TriLink Biotech, 0.88 µg) dissolved in PBS (40 µL) to give a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. A 20 µL aliquot was taken after 15 min of white LED irradiation (1 × 105 lx). Prior to loading, 2 µL of 6X Orange-G loading dye in glycerol were added to the aliquot and mixed vigorously. The gel was electrophoresed at 80 V for 35 min with 1% agarose gels in 1X Tris–acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer. Gels were then imaged in a Syngene G:BOX Gel Documentation System and band % quantification was performed using ImageJ Gel Analyzer.

In vitro toxicity towards human cells

Cell culture

Normal human lung fibroblasts, WI-38, were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and murine fibroblast cell line, 17Cl-1, was kindly provided by Ian Goodfellow’s lab (Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, UK). WI-38 cells were cultured in Dubelco’s modified essential medium (Gibco) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) containing penicillin (50 IU/mL) and streptomycin (50 μg/mL) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 17Cl-1 cells were cultured as described above. All Cell lines were maintained in a humidified environment at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and routinely tested to confirm the absence of Mycoplasma. All in vitro experiments were conducted between 60 and 80% confluent cultures at passage 6–15 (WI-38) and 25–35 (17Cl-1).

MTS viability assay

The effect on cell viability of WI-38 and 17Cl-1 cells after treatment with F1F4 and riboflavin was determined using the commercially available MTS [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H tetrazolium] assay (Promega). The MTS tetrazolium compound is reduced by cells into a coloured formazan product which is soluble in cell culture media. It can be detected colorimetrically between 450 and 540 nm with the measured absorbance directly proportional to the amount of metabolically active cells in culture. Cells were seeded into clear 96-well plates containing 10,000 cells/well in 100 µL complete growth medium and cultured for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Subsequently, cells were treated with varying concentrations of F1F4 and riboflavin (0.01–100 μM) dissolved in complete growth media containing 0.1% DMSO. After further 24 h incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, 20 µL of CelTiter 96® AQueous One Solution (Promega) was added into each well and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 1–4 h, according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The absorbance of each well was measured at 490 nm using a plate reader (Spark, Tecan). Control measurements included negative control of cells with DMEM, cells with DMEM containing 0.1% DMSO, cell-free culture media (blank) and cell-free sample dilutions in culture media to evaluate potential sample interferences with MTS assay. All experiments were conducted in biological triplicates. The percentage cell viability was calculated according to Eq. (1):

$$ {\text{Cell viability}} (\%) = 100 \, \times \,\left( {\frac{{{\text{Absorbance}}\, {\text{of}}\, {\text{treated}}\, {\text{cells}} - {\text{Absorbance}}\, {\text{of}}\, {\text{blank}}}}{{{\text{Absorbance}}\, {\text{of}}\, {\text{control}} - {\text{Absorbance}}\, {\text{of}}\, {\text{blank}}}}} \right) $$
(1)

An adapted method reported by Maisch et al. was used to conduct phototoxicity studies on human lung fibroblasts, WI-3828. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates containing 10,000 cells/well in 100 µL complete growth medium and cultured for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. On the next day, the growth media was removed, and cells were treated with 10 μM F1F4 and riboflavin dissolved in DMEM without serum and phenol red (Gibco) containing 0.1% DMSO. The resulting mixtures were then incubated in the dark for 5 min and then either illuminated with 1 × 105 lx for 5, 10 or 15 min, or incubated further in the dark for 15 min (dark control). After irradiation, the flavin solutions were removed and 100 μL of DMEM with 10% FBS and without phenol red was added to each well and incubated over night at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Subsequently, 20 µL of MTS reagent was added into each well and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 1–4 h and the absorbance of each well was measured at 490 nm using a plate reader. Control measurements included negative control untreated cells with light and in the dark containing 0.1% DMSO and cells treated with flavins for 15 min in the dark. All experiments were conducted in biological triplicates. The percentage cell viability was calculated according to Eq. (1).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Walsh, C. Flavin coenzymes: At the crossroads of biological redox chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 13(148), 155 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Massey, V. The chemical and biological versatility of riboflavin. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 283–296 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh, C. T. & Wencewicz, T. A. Flavoenzymes: Versatile catalysts in biosynthetic pathways. Nat. Prod. Rep. 30, 175–200 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker Dockrey, S. A. & Narayan, A. R. H. Flavin-dependent biocatalysts in synthesis. Tetrahedron 75, 1115–1121 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennis, J. T. M. & Mathes, T. Molecular eyes: Proteins that transform light into biological information. Interface Focus 3, 20130005 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cashmore, A. R. Cryptochromes: Enabling plants and animals to determine circadian time. Cell 114, 537–543 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Masuda, S. Light detection and signal transduction in the BLUF photoreceptors. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 171–179 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Losi, A. & Gärtner, W. Solving blue light riddles: New lessons from Flavin-binding LOV photoreceptors. Photochem. Photobiol. 93, 141–158 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. König, B., Kümmel, S., Svobodová, E. & Cibulka, R. Flavin photocatalysis. Phys. Sci. Rev. 3, (2019).

  10. Graml, A., Neveselý, T., Jan Kutta, R., Cibulka, R. & König, B. Deazaflavin reductive photocatalysis involves excited semiquinone radicals. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–11 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pokluda, A. et al. Robust photocatalytic method using ethylene-bridged flavinium salts for the aerobic oxidation of unactivated benzylic substrates. Adv. Synth. Catal. 363, 4371–4379 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cieplik, F. et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy–what we know and what we don’t. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 44, 571–589 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiehe, A., O’brien, J. M. & Senge, M. O. Trends and targets in antiviral phototherapy. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 18, 2565–2612 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maisch, T. Resistance in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 14, 1518–1526 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wainwright, M. et al. Photoantimicrobials—are we afraid of the light?. Lancet. Infect. Dis 17, e49–e55 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabino, C. P. et al. Light-based technologies for management of COVID-19 pandemic crisis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 212, 111999 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baptista, M. S. et al. Type I and Type II photosensitized oxidation reactions: Guidelines and mechanistic pathways. Photochem. Photobiol. 93, 912–919 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Glaeser, J., Nuss, A. M., Berghoff, B. A. & Klug, G. Singlet oxygen stress in microorganisms. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 58, 141–173 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodrich, R. P., Edrich, R. A., Li, J. & Seghatchian, J. The Mirasol™ PRT system for pathogen reduction of platelets and plasma: An overview of current status and future trends. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 35, 5–17 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marschner, S. & Goodrich, R. Pathogen reduction technology treatment of platelets, plasma and whole blood using riboflavin and UV light. Transfus. Med. Hemotherapy 38, 8–18 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keil, S. D., Bowen, R. & Marschner, S. Inactivation of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in plasma products using a riboflavin-based and ultraviolet light-based photochemical treatment. Transfusion 56, 2948–2952 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ragan, I., Hartson, L., Pidcoke, H., Bowen, R. & Goodrich, R. Pathogen reduction of SARS-CoV-2 virus in plasma and whole blood using riboflavin and UV light. PLoS ONE 15, e0233947 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Keil, S. D. et al. Inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in plasma and platelet products using a riboflavin and ultraviolet light-based photochemical treatment. Vox Sang. 115, 495–501 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong, T. W., Cheng, C. W., Hsieh, Z. J. & Liang, J. Y. Effects of blue or violet light on the inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by riboflavin-5′-phosphate photolysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 173, 672–680 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Edwards, A. M., Barredo, F., Silva, E., De Ioannes, A. E. & Becker, M. I. Apoptosis induction in nonirradiated human HL-60 and murine NSO/2 tumor cells by photoproducts of indole-3-acetic acid and riboflavin. Photochem. Photobiol. 70, 645–649 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Silva, A. V. et al. Riboflavin derivatives for enhanced photodynamic activity against Leishmania parasites. Tetrahedron 71, 457–462 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kou, J., Dou, D. & Yang, L. Porphyrin photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy and its applications. Oncotarget 8, 81591–81603 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Maisch, T. et al. Fast and effective photodynamic inactivation of multiresistant bacteria by cationic riboflavin derivatives. PLoS ONE 9, e111792 (2014).

    ADS  Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Eichner, A. et al. Fast and effective inactivation of Bacillus atrophaeus endospores using light-activated derivatives of vitamin B2. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 14, 387–396 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pendyala, B., Patras, A., Pokharel, B. & D’Souza, D. Genomic modeling as an approach to identify surrogates for use in experimental validation of SARS-CoV-2 and HuNoV inactivation by UV-C treatment. Front. Microbiol. 11, 2406 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Michel, H. & Hemmerich, P. Substitution of the flavin chromophore with lipophilic side chains: A novel membrane redox label. J. Membr. Biol. 60, 143–153 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmidt, W. Fluorescence properties of isotropically and anisotropically embedded Flavins. Photochem. Photobiol. 34, 7–16 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Trissl, H. W. Studies on the incorporation of fluorescent pigments into bilayer membranes. BBA Biomembr. 367, 326–337 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Koziar, J. C. & Cowan, D. O. Photochemical heavy-atom effects. Acc. Chem. Res. 11, 334–341 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Korvinson, K. A. et al. Improved Flavin-based catalytic photooxidation of alcohols through intersystem crossing rate enhancement. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 7294–7300 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gorman, A. et al. In vitro demonstration of the heavy-atom effect for photodynamic therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10619–10631 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wood, J. M. Bacterial responses to osmotic challenges. J. Gen. Physiol. 145, 381–388 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. La Rosa, G., Bonadonna, L., Lucentini, L., Kenmoe, S. & Suffredini, E. Coronavirus in water environments: Occurrence, persistence and concentration methods—A scoping review. Water Res. 179, 115899 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Michael, P. R., Johnston, D. E. & Moreno, W. A conversion guide: Solar irradiance and lux illuminance. J. Meas. Eng. 8, 153–166 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tyagi, A. & Penzkofer, A. Absorption and emission spectroscopic characterization of lumichrome in aqueous solutions. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 524–533 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Eckl, D. B. et al. Interplay of phosphate and carbonate ions with flavin photosensitizers in photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. PLoS ONE 16, e0253212 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hamblin, M. R. Antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation: a bright new technique to kill resistant microbes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 33, 67–73 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. EMA. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human use (CHMP) Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary use (CVMP) Guideline on the sterilisation of the medicinal product, active substance, excipient and primary container. www.ema.europa.eu (2019).

  44. Andreev, K. et al. Guanidino groups greatly enhance the action of antimicrobial peptidomimetics against bacterial cytoplasmic membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1838, 2492–2502 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kasai, H. & Yamaizumi, Z. Photosensitized formation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine) in DNA by riboflavin: A non singlet oxygen-mediated reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 9692–9694 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ito, K., Inoue, S., Yamamoto, K. & Kawanishi, S. 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine formation at the 5’ site of 5’-GG-3’ sequences in double-stranded DNA by UV radiation with riboflavin. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13221–13227 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou, Z. Y. & Bi, X. X. Experimental studies on the inactivation of HBV in blood via riboflavin photochemical treatment. Exp. Ther. Med. 13, 222–224 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou, Z. Y. & Bi, X. X. Evaluation of the inactivation effect of riboflavin photochemical method on duck hepatitis B virus. Exp. Ther. Med. 15, 751–754 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Note for Guidance on Virus Validation Studies : The Design, Contribution and Interpretation of Studies Validating the Inactivation and Removal of Viruses Cpmp/Bwp/268/95. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) vol. 0 http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003684.pdf (1996).

  50. Malenovska, H. Virus quantitation by transmission electron microscopy, TCID50, and the role of timing virus harvesting: A case study of three animal viruses. J. Virol. Methods 191, 136–140 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Burgstaller, P. & Famulok, M. Flavin-dependent photocleavage of RNA at G·U base pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 1137–1138 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu, Y. et al. Photosensitized damage to telomere overhang and telomerase RNA by riboflavin. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18, 401–404 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao, Y. et al. Sequence-specific RNA photocleavage by single-stranded DNA in presence of riboflavin. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–6 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kappus, H. Oxidative stress in chemical toxicity. Arch. Toxicol. 60, 144–149 (1987).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 27, 493–497 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Leibowitz, J., Kaufman, G. & Liu, P. Coronaviruses: Propagation, quantification, storage, and construction of recombinant mouse hepatitis virus. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 21, 15E.1.1-15E.1.46 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by EPSRC grant EP/V029762/1. LC would like to acknowledge support of the Leverhulme Trust grant RPG-2019-266. IM and CFK wish to acknowledge EPSRC grants EP/L015889/1 and EP/H018301/1. COF also acknowledges EPSRC grant EP/L015889/1 and the support by AstraZeneca in the framework of Project Beacon. AB acknowledges support of EPSRC IRC project EP/S009000/1. We wish to thank Ms Eleanor Hall for technical assistance with cell culture as well as the staff of NMR and MS facilities in the Department of Chemistry, the University of Cambridge for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation: L.C. and L.F. Investigation, methodology, data curation, formal analysis and visualisation: L.C., J.H.L., S.M., G.C.M., S.S., A.B.P., C.O.F. and I.M. Supervision and funding acquisition: C.F.K., G.C. and L.F. Writing—original draft: L.C. Writing—review & editing: J.H.L., S.M., G.C.M., S.S., A.B.P., C.O.F., I.M., C.F.K., G.C. and L.F.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ljiljana Fruk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crocker, L.B., Lee, J.H., Mital, S. et al. Tuning riboflavin derivatives for photodynamic inactivation of pathogens. Sci Rep 12, 6580 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10394-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10394-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing