Abstract
A complete understanding of muscle mechanics allows for the creation of models that closely mimic human muscle function so they can be used to study human locomotion and evaluate surgical intervention. This includes knowledge of muscle–tendon parameters required for accurate prediction of muscle forces. However, few studies report experimental data obtained directly from whole human muscle due to the invasive nature of these experiments. This article presents an intraoperative, in vivo measurement protocol for whole muscle–tendon parameters that include muscle–tendon unit length, sarcomere length, passive tension, and active tension in response to external stimulation. The advantage of this protocol is the ability to obtain these rare experimental data in situ in addition to muscle volume and weight since the gracilis is also completely removed from the leg. The entire protocol including the surgical steps for gracilis harvest takes ~ 3 h. Actual testing of the gracilis where experimental data is measured takes place within a 30-min window during surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Quantifying human muscle mechanical properties is an important step in understanding in vivo muscle function as well as developing computational muscle models. Musculoskeletal models are used in the study of human movement and the effects of surgical intervention but almost never developed using data directly obtained from humans. To ensure physiological accuracy, predictions made by such models must be validated against actual experimental data. However, it is extremely difficult to obtain physiological data from living human muscle. Thus, musculoskeletal models typically rely on inferred data from experiments performed on cadavers or isolated, living muscle in animals1,2. Obtaining experimental data from living humans remains a challenge. In response to this challenge, this protocol outlines the process of quantifying gracilis mechanical properties in patients who are undergoing a gracilis free functional muscle transfer surgery. The surgery is performed to restore upper extremity function in patients who had a traumatic brachial plexus injury. In this protocol, we describe measurement of in situ force–length properties at the time of surgery. We also provide details as to how the methods of muscle biopsy using a custom biopsy clamp can be used to measure sarcomere length via laser diffraction3.
Development of the protocol
Adult brachial plexus injuries (BPI) occur due to trauma and are most seen in motor vehicle accidents4. The mechanism of injury is violent or sudden extreme rotation of the head or shoulder which stretches or ruptures the nerves resulting in a BPI. Adult traumatic BPI are increasing due to the growing popularity of extreme sports and rising number of vehicular accident survivors5,6,7. Most patients require surgery to restore elbow flexion. There is a time dependant degeneration of motor end plates following injury. Surgical intervention, when possible, should occur within 6–10 months after injury to avoid this degradation8. When feasible, nerve grafting of viable nerve roots or nerve transfers are performed. In late cases or when restoration of rudimentary grasp is desired, a unique surgical procedure exists where a leg muscle (gracilis) is surgically harvested from the patient’s leg and transplanted into their arm to restore elbow flexion9. Since the gracilis is fully exposed during the muscle transfer, it represents an unprecedented opportunity to gather muscle physiological properties. The gracilis muscle function is characterized by measuring key parameters of sarcomere length, muscle–tendon length, muscle mass, and passive and active force–length properties. Pilot studies were performed to test the feasibility and logistics of measuring these parameters and these studies were used to develop the current protocol.
All methods used in this research involve experiments with human participants. This research study is performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent is obtained in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations for human subject research as specified in 45 CFR 46.116-General Requirements for Informed Consent and 21 CFR 50.25-Elements of Informed Consent. Each research subject provides their informed written consent for study participation. Each subject agrees to the use of their image, if needed, for publication purposes. The protocol is approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. We successfully demonstrated a viable, reproducible protocol to obtain in vivo normal human gracilis muscle–tendon length, sarcomere length, muscle architecture, high-fidelity active and passive force data.
Validation studies
Data obtained using this protocol were used to test the validity of predictions from a commonly used musculoskeletal models in OpenSim. Our results show that there are significant errors in muscle length predicted from current musculoskeletal models10. The greatest error occurred when the knee was fully extended with an absolute average error of muscle–tendon length of 7% and absolute average fiber length error between 15 and 32%. Furthermore, it was observed that the manual linear scaling method that was used by the models developed using OpenSim11 did not capture the normal variability in muscle–tendon length observed in human subjects.
Additionally, we showed that the human gracilis muscle has passive mechanical properties that are more like rodent muscle than rabbit muscle since it was observed there was only a modest increase in gracilis passive modulus when going from single fiber to whole muscle. One key finding from this study was that sarcomere strain rather than muscle strain is the best predictor of passive skeletal muscle stress12.
Applications of the method
The methodology to obtain active and passive mechanical properties of human skeletal muscle may be applied to other muscles for free functional muscle transfer or surgical procedures where the muscle and associated nerve, artery, and vein are exposed.
Comparison with other methods
Elucidating muscle function in relation to the joints it crosses is crucial for understanding human locomotion, however, direct measurements of individual human muscle force is very rare. In a few studies, force was measured from human Achilles tendon13. The data on triceps surae muscle group14 provided important but limited information during walking. Initially, force–length characteristics of upper extremity muscles were obtained from amputees15. The approach was modified, improved, and used on muscles of patients with cerebral palsy during tendon transfer surgeries16,17,18. These earlier intraoperative data collections on upper extremity muscles provided limited data. Data collection was performed after the tendon was divided and measurement of muscle force production capacity at specific joint positions was not possible. Recent intraoperative studies focused on collecting isometric muscle force with respect to joint angle position19,20. Implementation of buckle force transducers (BFTs) to human tendons enabled to measure muscle forces from an intact tendon. Using this approach, force–length characteristics of healthy gracilis muscle were reported e.g., during anterior cruciate ligament surgery21 and hamstring muscles of patients with cerebral palsy who undergo muscle lengthening surgeries22,23.
The main advantages of the present protocol are that (1) it allows us to measure the dimensions, shape, and weight of the whole muscle since the gracilis is completely removed from its native location. These can only be obtained during free muscle transfer surgeries. (2) This protocol is unique in that it provides an opportunity to relate not only the muscle force with the joint position but also with the sarcomere length.
Experimental design
Due to the unique and complex nature of brachial plexus reconstructive surgery involving a gracilis free functional muscle transfer, ideally the procedures are performed by two teams of surgeons to reduce anesthesia and surgical time. In this situation, one team of surgeons prepare brachial plexus nerves to be grafted or transferred as well as the donor nerve(s) and vessels for the gracilis transfer, while the second team harvests the myocutaneous free functioning gracilis. When done in this manner, there is a short window of time that the gracilis harvest team has before the upper extremity team is ready to receive the gracilis muscle. During this 20–30 min interval, muscle force–length data is obtained and does not disrupt the progress of the surgeons on the upper extremity or delay surgical progress.
Expertise needed to implement the protocol
Personnel required to execute the protocol include:
-
Orthopedic hand surgeon and surgical assistant: The orthopedic hand surgeon with expertise in microvascular surgery commences harvest of the gracilis muscle prior to testing, mounts the force transducer on the tendon and obtains the biopsy samples. The surgical assistant aids the surgeon in stabilizing the leg during muscle stimulation, measuring muscle–tendon unit (MTU) length. This team is part of the brachial plexus reconstruction team.
-
Neurophysiologist: They are responsible for setup of the intraoperative electromyography system and performing the muscle stimulation trials. This team is otherwise a normal part of the surgical reconstruction for intraoperative nerve testing of the brachial plexus roots.
-
Research scientist: They are responsible for data acquisition system set up that connects to the BFT, collects intraoperative data, and secures biopsy samples. They must be familiar with digital data acquisition systems, understand signal conditioning concepts, electronic instrumentation and can perform maintenance and calibration of the BFT.
-
Photographer: They are responsible for recording a video of the muscle for volumetric analysis as well as capturing images of the harvested gracilis when placed on a sterile towel and adjacent to a sterile ruler. Muscle and tendon length are measured from these images. They are called only when needed and are not present for the duration of the study.
Figure 1 shows the layout of the personnel in the operating room so they can all work together without interfering with the overall surgical procedure. The research scientist and neurophysiologist are on standby until the surgeon gives the indication that the experimental protocol can be performed.
Limitations
The limitations that must be considered when using this protocol include:
-
MTU length, force measurements and biopsy samples are obtained at multiple joint configurations. Therefore, the protocol requires repeated positioning of the leg at different joint configurations with predetermined joint angles. This source of error can be limited by having a single surgeon (AYS) position the leg for all subjects and choosing joint angles that can be easily approximated such as 45°, 60°, or 90° (refer to Fig. 7).
-
There will be minor unwanted leg movement during muscle stimulation since the patient’s leg is being held at the required joint configuration as the muscle contracts. This source of error is reduced by stimulating the muscle submaximally and thereby reducing muscle force production to manageable levels.
-
The submaximal muscle activation results in a reduced contraction and as such may not correctly represent the true force-generating potential of the gracilis. This has implications when modeling in vivo muscle function since the Hill-type models that are used are more accurate at predicting muscle forces under maximally activated conditions24. This issue can be addressed by calculating the level of muscle activation then scaling the peak force values to maximal activation conditions. First, calculate the ratio of peak force for the 2 Hz twitch at submaximal activation to peak force of the CMAP twitch at 100% activation. This ratio estimates muscle activation during the stimulation trials. We found that this ratio was close to 0.8 therefore it was appropriate to linearly increase the experimental peak force to estimate maximal activation peak force.
-
Active force measurement using the BFT prevents the use of electrocautery during the concurrent surgery at the upper extremity recipient site. The BFT signal is sensitive to this electrical interference resulting in a noisy signal. Careful cooperation and communication with the upper extremity team is necessary to limit delays during crucial stages of the surgery.
Materials
Human subjects
Caution
All research protocols must be approved by an Institutional Review Board. Subjects must be over 18 years old and scheduled to undergo a gracilis free functioning muscle transfer surgery to restore elbow flexion as part of their brachial plexus injury reconstruction9,25. Subjects must give written and informed consent to undergo the intraoperative gracilis muscle data collection as part of their brachial plexus reconstruction.
Equipment
Critical
These items are required for the experimental protocol. They are categorized according to equipment handled by the surgeon (and therefore must be sterile) and those handled by the research scientist (located on the periphery of the surgical field and nonsterile) collecting the intraoperative data. The biopsy clamps are steam sterilized and the BFT is ethylene oxide (ETO) sterilized per the institutional sterility requirements. The data acquisition software and hardware listed below are examples. It is not necessary to use these specific products for this protocol.
Sterile equipment for surgeon
-
Biopsy clamp26 in Fig. 2a (14 cm modified hemostat clamp, Sabri Group, Pompano Beach, FL, USA model 3-113-14)
-
BFT in Fig. 2b (× 2) (S-shape, dimensions: width = 10 mm length = 20 mm and height = 9 mm, TEKNOFIL, Istanbul, Turkey)
-
Plastic bowl (Medline DYND50315, Medline Industries, Mundelein, IL)
-
Ruler (Medline DYNJRULER, Medline Industries, Mundelein, IL)
-
#2 FiberWire suture with needle removed (AR-7200, Arthrex, Naples, FL)
-
Titanium Liga-Clips (Ethicon LigaClip MCA Medium, Johnson and Johnson, Cincinnati OH)
-
Nerve stimulator probe (90 mm Cadwell disposable side-by-side bipolar probe, Cadwell, Kennewick, WA, cat. no. 302429-00)
-
Subdermal needle electrodes (Cadwell twisted disposable subdermal needle electrode, Cadwell, Kennewick, WA, cat. no. 302821-000-060)
Nonsterile research equipment
-
Laptop with LabView (2019 version, National Instruments, Austin, TX)
-
Data acquisition system (USB 6000, National Instruments, Austin, TX)
-
Strain gauge amplifier (Model SGA, Interface force measurement solutions, Scottsdale, AZ)
-
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Instrument (Cadwell Cascade Pro, Cadwell, Kennewick, WA)
-
200 mL storage bottles (Corning 431431, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY)
-
50 mL conical tubes (Corning 352098, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY)
-
Parafilm (Parafilm “M”, American Can Co., Greenwich, CT)
-
Digital scale (CS-5000, Ohaus Corp., Parsippany, NJ)
-
Digital camera (EOS 5d mark iv, Canon U.S.A. Inc., MELVILLE, NY)
-
Floor cord cover (optional)
Reagents
-
10 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
-
10% buffered Formalin
Reagent setup
1X PBS solution. Dissolve 20 mL of 10X PBS in 180 mL distilled water.
Buckle force transducer (BFT) calibration
The BFT is calibrated in the laboratory according to methods described by An et al.27. First, the BFT and data acquisition system are connected. The voltage offset on the strain gauge amplifier (Model SGA, Interface force measurement solutions, Scottsdale, AZ) is adjusted until the output of the BFT is zero, meaning that the Wheatstone bridge circuit of the BFT is balanced. The BFT is mounted on a length of rope (inset image Fig. 3) and voltage is recorded as four 0.9 kg (two-pound) weights are incrementally suspended to calibrate the BFT between 0 and 36 N. The calibration curve of force versus voltage is plotted resulting in a linear relationship with a coefficient of determination exceeding 0.9. The slope of this relationship yields the conversion factor (in units of NV−1) for that specific BFT. To account for subject specific tendon thickness, regression analysis is used to correct the conversion factor as a function of tendon thickness. Therefore, the calibration steps are repeated for materials of varying thickness (1–7 mm) (Fig. 3).
Custom data acquisition program
The amplified signal from the BFT is collected with a data acquisition system (USB-6000, National Instruments) at a sampling frequency of 1 kHz. For the custom user interface, we recommend that the display show the live feed from the BFT to the operating room staff so that they can monitor its function as well as a separate display showing the previous trial that was collected. The custom LabVIEW user interface is shown in Fig. 4 for reference.
Phases of the procedure
The procedure is broken into phases listed below. These phases are also identified within the procedure section where the experimental instructions are listed.
Setup of USB data acquisition device (DAQ)
Calibration is performed in the laboratory prior to the surgery. Therefore, all devices should just be connected, powered on and ready to go. A schematic of the BFT setup is shown in foreground of Fig. 5. The research scientist performs this setup while the surgeon prepares the gracilis to be harvested.
Surgical technique for preparing the gracilis MTU
The steps for harvesting the gracilis are modified from the description by Giuffre et al.25, leaving the muscle origin and insertion intact until testing is completed. The contralateral gracilis is typically used as the donor muscle secondary to the vascular pedicle orientation to the recipient vessels of the side of the brachial plexus injury. Exposure of the gracilis occurs simultaneously with the operative team exposing the brachial plexus, the infraclavicular vessels and recipient site. Three incisions made to harvest the gracilis (Fig. 6).
Short term paralytic agents are used for induction of anesthesia. After induction, no inhalational anesthetics are used during the exploration of the brachial plexus, harvest and testing of the muscle. Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) is utilized to optimize intraoperative nerve testing of the brachial plexus. Once evoked potentials are obtained, anesthesia is switched to inhalational anesthetics. TIVA is used during the entire muscle harvest and testing. The most commonly used TIVA agent is Propofol augmented with an opioid.
Intraoperative measurement
Force and length are measured from the MTU in situ with the muscle origin and insertion intact. These data are recorded at four joint configurations (Fig. 7). As the limb is placed in the various joint configuration the MTU is lengthened.
Measurement of MTU length
MTU length is measured using suture held at the origin and insertion of the gracilis and marked using surgical clips.
Measurement of muscle force with intraoperative stimulation of the motor nerve
Critical
In vivo muscle force is measured by stimulating the muscle via the obturator nerve and measuring the muscle passive and active forces using a BFT mounted on the gracilis distal tendon. The surgeon first mounts and secures the BFT on the gracilis tendon then inserts the EMG electrodes required for stimulating the muscle. The obturator nerve is first stimulated to determine the current required to produce a maximal compound muscle action potential (CMAP). For data acquisition this current is reduced by 50% and 25% to better stabilize the leg and prevent excessive forces from being generated thereby ensuring isometric conditions. We recommend having a backup sterilized BFT ready to be quickly substituted if any technical problems arise.
Muscle biopsy
Muscle tissue samples are taken from the exposed proximal gracilis muscle using a novel muscle biopsy clamp26 that has been validated against intraoperative laser diffraction-measured sarcomere length in rabbit muscle. Harvested muscle is located proximally to the skin paddle. Using a minimal touch technique, a 1 mm thick portion of muscle is dissected for a length of 2 cm, placed in the muscle biopsy clamp, divided, and immediately placed in buffered Formalin. This length of dissection ensures that the muscle specimen is not stretched during placement of the clamps. The specimen remains in the buffered solution for 2 days. After fixation, it is removed from the buffered solution and stored in 200 ml of 1X PBS until ready for sarcomere length measurement.
Measurement of muscle weight and videography of muscle
When the upper extremity is ready to receive the gracilis muscle, the gracilis is harvested with a goal of being revascularized within 60 min. During this time, the gracilis is weighed, and its dimensions are documented using high resolution pictures and video holding the distal tendon up and rotating the muscle next to a ruler. Images of the muscle are used to measure muscle and tendon length while the video is used to obtain volumetric measurements.
Procedure
Setup of USB data acquisition device (DAQ)
-
1.
Connect the USB DAQ to the computer with LabVIEW installed. Connect the strain gauge amplifier to the DAQ.
-
2.
Load custom data acquisition program.
-
3.
Confirm all devices are working.
Surgical technique for preparing the gracilis MTU
-
4.
The patient is placed in a supine position and undergoes a general endotracheal anesthesia after which paralytic agents are restricted secondary to the need for evaluation of donor motor nerves for the brachial plexus reconstruction. The patient is positioned in a slight beach chair position and the entire lower extremity is prepped and draped.
-
5.
The gracilis harvest commences with the identification of the distal gracilis tendon at the level of the pes anserine of the medial proximal tibia. A longitudinal incision is made over the pes anserine, the sartorius fascia elevated and the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons are identified. Umbilical tape is placed around the gracilis tendon and the soft tissue attachments are methodically dissected off the tendon proximally while preserving the gracilis insertion. A longitudinal distal medial thigh incision is made to identify the muscle tendon junction of the gracilis. The gracilis tendon is freed from all surrounding soft tissue between both the tibia and distal thigh incisions. This was verified by ensuring the gracilis tendon glides freely between both incisions (Fig. 8a).
-
6.
The gracilis tendon at the distal thigh incision is pulled using the umbilical tape and the outline of the gracilis drawn on the proximal thigh (Fig. 8b). A handheld Doppler is used to define the anterior and posterior borders of the gracilis muscle as well as the proximal vascular perforators to the skin paddle. The skin paddle is then drawn about the vascular perforators (Fig. 8b), which is approximately 6–10 cm from the groin crease.
-
7.
An incision is made along the anterior skin paddle outline and dissection was carried through the adductor longus fascia. The adductor longus fascia is sewn to the anterior skin paddle to prevent shearing of the skin paddle.
-
8.
The vascular pedicle and the obturator motor branch to the gracilis are identified between the adductor longus and the gracilis. The nerve is verified using a handheld nerve stimulator and a vessel loop is placed around the obturator motor branch to the gracilis (Fig. 8c). The vascular perforators to the adductor longus are ligated and the vascular pedicle (artery and two venae commitantes) are dissected to the level of the profunda femoral vessels.
-
9.
The obturator motor branch to the gracilis is carefully dissected as far proximally as possible. The proximal gracilis tendon is visualized and cleared so its insertion on inferior pubic ramus is visible. The incision on the posterior skin paddle outline is made and dissection was done such that a fascial sleeve was maintained around the gracilis muscle (Fig. 8d).
Intraoperative measurement.
Measurement of MTU length
-
10.
A number 2 fiber wire suture (Arthrex, Naples FL) is passed from the proximal thigh incision, following the anterior edge of the gracilis, to the distal thigh incision, and then out the incision over the pes anerine. A Carmalt clamp holds the end of the fiber wire suture onto the pubic ramus origin of the gracilis muscle (Fig. 9a).
-
11.
The hip and knee are placed in the specific joint configuration (JC) orientations described in Fig. 7 starting with the shortest length first (JC1), the distal fiber wire suture is pulled taught and marked with a Ligaclip at the level of the tibial tubercle (inset Fig. 9b).
-
12.
The leg is manipulated to the other joint configurations, each time marking the length of the MTU on the suture. The fiber wire suture is removed, a knot is tied on the distal end and is passed off the surgical field where the measurements are subsequently determined in the laboratory.
Measurement of muscle force with intraoperative stimulation of the motor nerve
-
13.
Start custom data capture code.
-
14.
The surgeon mounts the BFT on the distal gracilis tendon at the pes anserine. To prevent shifting or unwanted movement of the transducer, it is placed under the skin, and the skin temporarily closed with surgical staples (Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Cincinnati, OH). The transducer cord is stapled along the tibia in a “S” configuration to prevent traction displacement.
-
15.
The BFT cable is dangled off the surgical table towards the research scientist, who connects the cable to the strain gauge amplifier input.
-
16.
The nerve stimulator probe is bent with a gentle hook and the obturator motor nerve branch to the gracilis muscle is placed on the hook approximately 3–4 cm proximal to its entrance into the gracilis muscle. A test stimulation is performed to verify muscle contraction as well as force transducer function. Care is taken by the surgeon not to put undue traction on the obturator nerve.
-
17.
The active electrode is placed near the anticipated motor end plate, the reference electrode is placed distal in subcutaneous tissue near the gracilis tendon, and the ground is place between the active electrode and stimulator (Fig. 10).
-
18.
The system is checked with several test stimulations prior to commencement of testing. Refer to troubleshooting table (Table 1).
-
19.
The leg is moved to the first joint configuration and held in place by the surgeon and assistant.
-
20.
A maximal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) response is obtained by stimulating the obturator nerve with square-wave pulses of 0.1 ms duration and intensity starting at 1 mA. The current at which a maximal CMAP response is obtained is noted and reduced by 50%, ensuring submaximal stimulation.
-
21.
The muscle is stimulated for two consecutive trials at 2 Hz each lasting two seconds. After a rest period of 10 s, the muscle is then stimulated for two consecutive trials at 20 Hz each lasting two seconds. Refer to troubleshooting table (Table 1).
-
22.
The stimulation current is reduced to 25% of the current required to obtain a maximal CMAP and the 2 Hz and 20 Hz trials are repeated. Refer to troubleshooting table (Table 1).
-
23.
Steps 20–22 are repeated for each joint configuration. These nine stimulation trials are captured for each joint configuration spanning the muscle excursion range (JC1 to JC4).
-
24.
Once all testing is completed for each joint configuration, the force transducer and EMG electrodes are removed.
Muscle biopsy
-
25.
The leg is positioned to the shortest muscle length, JC1.
-
26.
The surgeon positions the biopsy clamp and it is engaged after ensuring the muscle is in its resting position for that joint configuration (Fig. 11a) and remains unstretched.
-
27.
The sample is bluntly dissected and freed from surrounding tissue so that when it is placed in the clamp jaws the muscle bundle is not stretched (Fig. 11b).
-
28.
The isolated muscle fiber bundle is released proximally and distally to the clamp.
-
29.
Immediately after the biopsy is taken, the surgeon places the clamp into a 50 mL conical tube containing 10% buffered Formalin that is held by the research scientist located on the periphery of the surgical field. The research scientist sets aside the submerged sample and provides the surgeon with another conical tube containing Formalin in preparation for the next biopsy sample.
-
30.
Steps 26–27 are repeated for the remaining joint configurations.
-
31.
After all the biopsy samples are obtained for each joint configuration, the research scientist covers each conical tube with parafilm, places the lid on and stores them in a biohazard transportation container. The biopsy samples will remain in Formalin for 2 days after which they are removed (Fig. 11c) and stored in 200 ml of 1X PBS solution.
-
32.
A tray table covered with sterile plastic is prepared to be used when weighing the muscle and capturing muscle images.
Muscle weight and videography
-
33.
Gracilis harvest continues by division of the obturator motor nerve as proximal as possible and detachment of the distal tendon at the tibia.
-
34.
The gracilis muscle is delivered into the proximal thigh wound (Fig. 12a) and the fascia of the adductor magnus is elevated so that a fascial sling surrounds the proximal gracilis. The proximal attachment to the pubic rami is taken down (Fig. 12c). At this time the gracilis is completely free with the exception of its vascular pedicle (Fig. 12b). The muscle is temporarily left in its native bed by placing skin staples on the skin paddle to the anterior skin edge until the muscle is ready to be transferred.
-
35.
When the upper extremity is ready to receive the gracilis muscle, the vascular pedicle of the gracilis is visualized and the artery and two venae commitantes are ligated and the ischemic clock is started.
-
36.
The gracilis muscle is placed in a sterile bowl and weighed.
-
37.
The surgeon holds the gracilis MTU at the distal tendon allowing the muscle to rotate along its long axis next to a ruler. A video of the rotating muscle is recorded.
-
38.
The freed muscle is placed on a sterile surgical towel and photographed next to a ruler which provided calibration.
-
39.
Once this is complete, the gracilis is transferred to the upper extremity and the remainder of the reconstruction is completed.
Troubleshooting (Table 1)
Timing
These times are estimates for a surgeon and research scientist with experience performing this protocol. When attempting this protocol for the first time, aspects of the protocol may take longer, particularly the muscle stimulation and force measurement steps.
Steps 1–2, setup of BFT connected devices: 10–15 min.
Steps 3–8, preparing gracilis muscle for harvest: 1.5–2 h.
Steps 9–11, MTU length measurement: 5–10 min.
Steps 12–23, muscle force measurement: 25–35 min.
Steps 24–29, muscle biopsy samples: 5 min.
Steps 30–35, muscle weighing and photography: 5 min.
Anticipated results
Buckle force data for three subjects are shown in Fig. 13. Maximal CMAP twitch, 2 Hz and 20 Hz stimulation trials for each joint configuration are presented in each column. Unfused tetanic contractions are observed at 20 Hz for each joint configuration. To evaluate intra-subject variability, peak force was compared between the two 2 Hz and 20 Hz trials. The root mean squared error was calculated to be 2.4 N and 9.8 N for the 2 Hz and 20 Hz trials, respectively.
A more detailed look at the force traces is presented in Fig. 14. Note that the twitch demonstrates the typical asymmetrical rise time and lengthened fall time characteristic of skeletal muscle (see comparisons in Fig. 1A of Oda, et al.28 and Fig. 1 of Lieber29) indicating that it is free to develop force and that it is sufficiently activated by the motor nerve to recruit most or all of the motor units. Note also that at 2 Hz stimulation, the twitch is nearly completely relaxed while at 20 Hz stimulation, temporal summation of contractile events occurs leading to tetanic contraction as the active tension (AT). The high frequency 20 Hz tension ripple can be seen at the peak of the tetanic contraction (Fig. 14, inset).
The variation in muscle force with stimulation intensity is depicted in Fig. 15. Figure 15a shows the raw experimental values for one subject where the force increases with increasing stimulation current until it plateaus. Figure 15b shows the normalized force-current relationship averaged over 12 subjects. These data were recorded during step 20 when the neurophysiologist gradually increases the stimulation current until a maximal CMAP response is recorded.
Twitch contractile parameters and their definitions are shown in Fig. 16. Normalized peak force of the first 2 Hz twitch and 0.5 Hz twitch for seventeen subjects were compared. The ratio of peak stress was approximately 0.8 and indicate that nearly all the motor units are being activated during the submaximal stimulated 2 Hz trials. The relatively long contraction and relaxation times (Fig. 16c–e) support the fact that the gracilis is comprised of about 75% slow muscle fibers30.
The harvested MTU is shown in Fig. 17. MTU, muscle and external tendon slack length are measured from these images. External tendon length is measured from the point where the muscle fibers terminate distally. The skin paddle is shown near the muscle origin along with neurovascular supply and adipose tissue.
Data availability
Raw data obtained using this protocol are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Code availability
Custom LabVIEW code used in the protocol will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.
References
Winters, T. M., Takahashi, M., Lieber, R. L. & Ward, S. R. Whole muscle length-tension relationships are accurately modeled as scaled sarcomeres in rabbit hindlimb muscles. J. Biomech. 44, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.033 (2011).
Zajac, F. E. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17, 359–411 (1989).
Lieber, R. L., Yeh, Y. & Baskin, R. J. Sarcomere length determination using laser diffraction. Effect of beam and fiber diameter. Biophys. J. 45, 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84246-0 (1984).
Noland, S. S., Bishop, A. T., Spinner, R. J. & Shin, A. Y. Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 27, 705–716. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00433 (2019).
Faglioni, W. Jr., Siqueira, M. G., Martins, R. S., Heise, C. O. & Foroni, L. The epidemiology of adult traumatic brachial plexus lesions in a large metropolis. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 156, 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1948-x (2014).
Bekelis, K., Missios, S. & Spinner, R. J. Falls and peripheral nerve injuries: an age-dependent relationship. J. Neurosurg. 123, 1223–1229. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.JNS142111 (2015).
Kaiser, R., Waldauf, P. & Haninec, P. Types and severity of operated supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries caused by traffic accidents. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 154, 1293–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1291-7 (2012).
Martin, E., Senders, J. T., DiRisio, A. C., Smith, T. R. & Broekman, M. L. D. Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review. J. Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.1.JNS172068 (2018).
Maldonado, A. A., Kircher, M. F., Spinner, R. J., Bishop, A. T. & Shin, A. Y. Free functioning gracilis muscle transfer with and without simultaneous intercostal nerve transfer to musculocutaneous nerve for restoration of elbow flexion after traumatic adult brachial pan-plexus injury. J. Hand Surg. 42(293), e291-293.e297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.014 (2017).
Persad, L. S., Ates, F., Shin, A. Y., Lieber, R. L. & Kaufman, K. R. Measuring and modeling in vivo human gracilis muscle-tendon unit length. J. Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110592 (2021).
Seth, A. et al. OpenSim: Simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006223 (2018).
Persad, L. S., Binder-Markey, B. I., Shin, A. Y., Kaufman, K. R. & Lieber, R. L. In vivo human gracilis whole muscle passive stress-sarcomere strain relationship. J. Exp. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.242722 (2021).
Komi, P. V. Biomecanical loading of achiles tendon during normal locomotion. Clin. Sports Med. 11, 521–530 (1992).
Ebrahimi, A. et al. Achilles tendon loading is lower in older adults than young adults across a broad range of walking speeds. Exp. Gerontol. 137, 110966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2020.110966 (2020).
Ralston, H. J. et al. Mechanics of human isolated voluntary muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 151, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1947.151.2.612 (1947).
Freehafer, A. A., Peckham, P. H. & Keith, M. W. Determination of muscle-tendon unit properties during tendon transfer. J. Hand Surg. 4, 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(79)80069-6 (1979).
Kreulen, M., Smeulders, M. J., Hage, J. J. & Huijing, P. A. Biomechanical effects of dissecting flexor carpi ulnaris. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 85, 856–859 (2003).
Smeulders, M. J., Kreulen, M., Hage, J. J., Huijing, P. A. & van der Horst, C. M. Intraoperative measurement of force-length relationship of human forearm muscle. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200401000-00041 (2004).
Ateş, F., Temelli, Y. & Yucesoy, C. A. Human spastic Gracilis muscle isometric forces measured intraoperatively as a function of knee angle show no abnormal muscular mechanics. Clin. Biomech. 28, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.08.012 (2013).
Ates, F., Temelli, Y. & Yucesoy, C. A. The mechanics of activated semitendinosus are not representative of the pathological knee joint condition of children with cerebral palsy. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 28, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.04.002 (2016).
Yucesoy, C. A., Ateş, F., Akgün, U. & Karahan, M. Measurement of human Gracilis muscle isometric forces as a function of knee angle, intraoperatively. J. Biomech. 43, 2665–2671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.002 (2010).
Yucesoy, C. A., Temelli, Y. & Ates, F. Intra-operatively measured spastic semimembranosus forces of children with cerebral palsy. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 36, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.07.003 (2017).
Ates, F., Temelli, Y. & Yucesoy, C. A. Effects of antagonistic and synergistic muscles’ co-activation on mechanics of activated spastic semitendinosus in children with cerebral palsy. Hum. Mov. Sci. 57, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.11.011 (2018).
Millard, M., Uchida, T., Seth, A. & Delp, S. L. Flexing computational muscle: Modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics. J. Biomech. Eng. 135, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023390 (2013).
Giuffre, J. L., Bishop, A. T. & Shin, A. Y. Harvest of an entire gracilis muscle and tendon for use in functional muscle transfer: A novel technique. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 28, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1313767 (2012).
Ward, S. R., Takahashi, M., Winters, T. M., Kwan, A. & Lieber, R. L. A novel muscle biopsy clamp yields accurate in vivo sarcomere length values. J. Biomech. 42, 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.004 (2009).
An, K. N., Berglund, L., Cooney, W. P., Chao, E. Y. S. & Kovacevic, N. Direct in vivo tendon force measurement system. J. Biomech. 23, 1269–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90384-F (1990).
Oda, T. et al. In vivo behavior of muscle fascicles and tendinous tissues in human tibialis anterior muscle during twitch contraction. J. Biomech. 40, 3114–3120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.023 (2007).
Lieber, R. L. Skeletal muscle adaptability. III: Muscle properties following chronic electrical stimulation. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 28, 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb03913.x (1986).
Tirrell, T. F. et al. Human skeletal muscle biochemical diversity. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 2551–2559. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.069385 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This work was generously supported by VA funding 1 I01 RX002462. This work was also supported in part by Research Career Scientist Award Number IK6 RX003351 from the United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation R&D (Rehab RD) Service. Pilot projects leading to this protocol were supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1255833 (to LQE) and the Mayo Graduate School.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.Y.S. and L.S.P. performed the experiments. A.Y.S. performed the gracilis surgery, intraoperative evaluation, and muscle biopsies. K.R.K., R.L.L., A.Y.S., W.J.L., F.A. and L.Q.E. designed the study. L.S.P., K.R.K., R.L.L., A.Y.S., and W.J.L. analyzed the data. All authors participated in manuscript preparation and gave approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Persad, L.S., Ates, F., Evertz, L.Q. et al. Procedures for obtaining muscle physiology parameters during a gracilis free-functioning muscle transfer in adult patients with brachial plexus injury. Sci Rep 12, 6095 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09861-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09861-y
This article is cited by
-
Determining a musculoskeletal system’s pre-stretched state using continuum–mechanical forward modelling and joint range optimization
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology (2024)
-
Detecting age-related changes in skeletal muscle mechanics using ultrasound shear wave elastography
Scientific Reports (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.