Abstract
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients have alterations in body composition. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) evaluates body composition, hydration status, and fluid distribution. Subjects with fluid disturbances have been found to have lower FEV1, respiratory muscle strength, and poor prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the effect of hydration status and fluid distribution on pulmonary function in COPD patients. A cross-sectional study, 180 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD were included. Patients with asthma, advanced renal or liver disease, acute HF, exacerbation of COPD, or pacemakers were excluded. Hydration status variables (TBW, ECW, ICW) and disturbance of fluid distribution [impedance ratio (IR) > 0.84 and phase angle (PhA)] were evaluated by BIA. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry. The mean population age was 71.55 ± 8.94 years; 55% were men. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the IR ≥ 0.84 or < 0.84. The group with higher IR ≥ 0.84 had lower FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, DLCO and, PhA compared to those with IR < 0.84. After adjusting for confounding variables TBW, ECW, IR ≥ 0.84, PhA, and resistance/height increase were associated with decreased FEV1. In the same way, with IR ≥ 0.84, edema index ≥ 0.48, trunk and abdominal IR were negatively associated with FVC, and PhA had a positive association with FVC. Fluid distribution, especially IR and PhA, could be a useful parameter for predicting pulmonary function in COPD patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common, preventable, and treatable disease characterized by airflow limitation due to airway and/or alveolar abnormalities, usually caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases1, COPD is associated with several comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic renal failure, lung cancer, and complications like heart failure and cachexia affect its prognosis2. COPD has been considered a world health problem because it affects 600 million persons globally3 and is the 4th cause of global death; also, its mortality reached 30–48% in 4–7 years in persons 65–70 years old4.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is easy-to-use, noninvasive, and safe method for evaluation of body composition widely used in COPD patients5,6,7,8,9,10, in particular, the multifrequency modality (MF-BIA) allows evaluation of hydration status and fluid distribution. MF-BIA is considered more precise and accurate for the measurement of extracellular (ECW) and intracellular water (ICW) than single-frequency BIA11. Edema is not usually detectable until the interstitial fluid volume rises about 30% above average (4–5 kg of body weight). In contrast, the BIA can detect changes in tissue hydration status below 500 ml12.
The impedance ratio (IR) evaluates the fluid distribution between ICW and ECW and membrane integrity. IR is obtained from the ratio of impedance (Z) at a higher frequency and Z at a lower frequency (200 kHz/Z at 5 kHz/Z)13. Low frequencies do not pass through the cell membrane and are conducted only through ECW, while high frequencies penetrate cell membranes and are used to estimate total body water (TBW).
In COPD patients, Blasio et al. showed that patients with 5/250 kHz IR below the median had lower FEV1, vital capacity, respiratory muscle strength, both maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure, fat-free mass index, and handgrip strength7. Moreover, COPD patients with sarcopenia had increased ECW/ICW ratio evaluated by 250/5 kHz IR, and this increase was even higher in severe sarcopenia 8. IR is a strong and independent predictor of 2-year mortality (HR: 1.16, CI 95%; 1.03–1.30) in COPD patients10. Likewise, the ECW/ICW ratio indicates the cellular hydration state. In COPD patients, the ECW/ICW ratio was inversely associated with Peak VO214.
Another important marker of hydric status is the phase angle (PhA), which provides information about water distribution between ICW and ECW spaces, cellular mass, cellular integrity, and prognosis6,8,10.
In hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease, fluid overload, assessed by MF-BIA, is associated with restrictive and obstructive respiratory abnormalities15. However, few studies have evaluated the hydric alterations in COPD patients7,8,10 and its impact on pulmonary function. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hydration status and fluid distribution on pulmonary function in COPD patients.
Methods
Study design
A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Cardiology Service at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas” from August 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020.
Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations16 were included. Age > 40 years old, smoking record (tobacco index > 10), or wood smoke or biomass exposure (> 200 h/year), and spirometry with a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.701 constituted inclusion criteria. Patients with asthma, advanced renal or liver disease, acute HF, exacerbation of COPD, pacemakers, acute coronary syndromes, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft within the prior three months were excluded.
The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics and Research Committee of Biomedical Research in Humans of the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas” (approval number E-02-18).
Outcome measures
Body composition, anthropometry, pulmonary function, clinical and demographic variables, which are part of the clinical management of the patients who come to our Institute, were evaluated.
Anthropometry
Weight and height were measured according to the manual reference of anthropometric standardization17; all subjects wore light clothing and were barefoot. Body mass index was calculated by dividing the total body weight (kilograms) by the squared height (meters).
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)
Total body composition and raw variables were measured with whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis using four-pole multifrequency equipment BodyStat QuadScan 4000 (BodyStat, Isle of Man, UK) by standard technique18: The measurements were conducted by the same operator, in the morning, in a comfortable area, free of drafts, with portable electric heaters. The area was cleaned before the study. The subjects were fasting and should not have exercised eight hours before or consumed alcohol 12 h before the study. During the entire study, the person was in a supine position with the arms separated from trunk by about 30° and the legs separated by about 45°. Electrodes were placed on the hand and ipsilateral foot. We registered the resistance, reactance, PhA, and IR.
Impedance ratio (IR) was calculated as follows: the ratio of high (200 kHz) to low frequency (5 kHz) of multifrequency BIA. In our population, the 50-percentile value was 0.84.
Segmental impedance ratio
The segmental impedance ratio was performed in the same position as whole-body bioimpedance. Segmental IR was calculated as the ratio of high (200 kHz) to low frequency (5 kHz).
Trunk impedance ratio: A pair of electrodes was placed on the midline at the interclavicular level, and the second pair was placed on the right upper ventral iliac spine.
Thorax impedance ratio: A pair of electrodes was placed on the midline at the interclavicular level, second pair placed on the right costal border.
Abdomen impedance ratio: A pair of electrodes was placed on the midline at the xiphoid process level, a second pair placed on the right upper ventral iliac spine.
Edema index was calculated as follows: the ratio between ECW (lt) to TBW (lt). In our population, the 75-percentile value was 0.48.
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength was measured with a mechanical Smedley Hand Dynamometer (Stoelting, Wood Dale, UK) according to the technique described in Rodriguez et al.19.
Pulmonary function
Spirometry testing was conducted by an experienced respiratory medicine technician using a portable spirometer (EasyOnePC, Ndd Medical Technologies Inc., Zürich, Switzerland) according to the standards of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society20. The spirometry variables analyzed were the Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1) and the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) after administration of a bronchodilator. After 15 min at rest, the participant performed a maximum forced inhalation and a powerful forced expiration using a nose clip. The reference values for spirometry were obtained for Mexican–American individuals21.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed using a commercially available STATA version 14 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, U.S.A.). Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages; continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean and standard deviation. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test the normality of continuous variables. Normal continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation, while non-normal variables were presented as median and percentiles 25–75. A comparison among study groups was analyzed with X2 for categorical variables and unpaired Student's t-test or Mann‐Whitney U tests for continuous variables.
Linear regression analysis was performed to examine the association between pulmonary function (FEV1% predicted and FVC % predicted) and hydration status and fluid distribution. The models were adjusted for sex, height, and age. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics, and Research Committee of Biomedical Research in Humans of the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas” and all participants gave informed consent.
Results
One hundred and eighty patients with stable COPD were included. The mean population age was 71.55 ± 8.94 years; 55% were men. Subjects were divided in two groups according the IR ≥ 0.84 (n = 88) or < 0.84 (n = 92). Table 1 shows the basal characteristics of the patients according to IR. The group with higher IR ≥ 0.84 had fewer men (44.32% vs 65.22%, p = 0.005), were older, (74.27 ± 7.85 vs 68.95 ± 9.19, p < 0.001) and had lower albumin levels (3.33 ± 0.65 mg/dl vs 4.07 ± 0.49 mg/d, p = 0.011). FEV1 was lower (lts: 1.01 ± 0.44 vs 1.40 ± 0.66, p < 0.001; %: 50.35 ± 21.50 vs 58.87 ± 21.83, p = 0.009) as was FVC (lts: 2.04 ± 0.66 vs 2.55 ± 0.91, p < 0.001; %: 71.06 ± 18.65 vs 78.36 ± 18.52, p = 0.009). The FEV1/FVC was lower (0.50 ± 0.13 vs 0.54 ± 0.13, p = 0.041) and the carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) as well (52.07 ± 28.77% vs. 76.51 ± 31.06%, p = 0.014). The same was true of weight (64.23 ± 15.31 kg vs 69.65 ± 16.08 kg, p = 0.021) handgrip strength (20.76 ± 7.41 kg vs 26.06 ± 8.25 kg, p < 0.001), skeletal muscle mass index (7.61 ± 1.65 kg/m vs 8.77 ± 1.79, p < 0.001) and PhA (4.46 ± 0.47 vs 5.79 ± 0.92, p < 0.001) compared to those with IR < 0.84. The left atrial volume index was higher (37.6 ± 11.98 vs. 33.51 ± 8.16, p = 0.078). Table 2 shows the association between hydration status and fluid distribution with FEV1 and FVC adjusted by age, sex, and height. TBW, ECW, IR ≥ 0.84, and resistance/height increase were associated with FEV1 decrease, while PhA was associated with FEV1 increase. Likewise, with the IR ≥ 0.84 and the edema index ≥ 0.48, trunk and abdominal IR were negatively associated with FVC, while the PhA had a positive association with FVC.
Discussion
The main finding in our study was the significance of the impact of hydration status and fluid distribution on pulmonary function in COPD patients.
Several studies have found that weight increase is frequently associated with functional class decreases and pulmonary congestion in the absence of clinical edema24,25, although the pathophysiology of impaired pulmonary function has not been completely elucidated. In some cases, respiratory symptoms are either underestimated or overlooked in clinical practice22. However, the methods for estimating body composition like imaging technique and isotope dilution to evaluate hydration status are relatively invasive, expensive, and not suitable in clinical practice12,23. The BIA is a non-invasive, inexpensive, and easily reproducible procedure that detects fluid overload and fluid distribution24. This method has already been validated in several pathologies, demonstrating that an IR higher than 0.80 is associated with fluid overload25 and is an independent predictor of mortality in hemodialysis and COPD patients7,26.
Lower values of IR and higher values of PhA provide information about the fluid distribution between ICW and ECW compartments. Moreover, they are considered indicators of greater cellularity, cell membrane integrity, and nutritional status. IR disturbance is associated with diminished pulmonary function, lower peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, fat-free mass index, physical function, and poor prognosis in COPD patients7,10. In this study, we observed that IR ≥ 0.84 was an independent predictor for FEV1 (β: − 13.149, CI 95%; − 19.671 to -6.627, p < 0.001) and FVC (β: − 9.260, CI 95%; − 15.092 to − 3.429, p < 0.002) adjusted for age, sex and height. The subjects with IR ≥ 0.84 had a 13.14% lower FEV1 and 9.26% lower FVC than subjects with IR < 0.84 in this population.
In COPD patients, low PhA was associated with low FEV1, low skeletal muscle mass, diminished physical function, increased disease severity, malnutrition, poor quality of life, longer hospital stay, exacerbations, and poor prognosis6,10. Our results showed that the PhA is a strong independent predictor of FEV1 (β: 7.76, CI 95%; 4.179 to 11.348, p < 0.001) and FVC (β: 3.25, CI 95%; 1.077–6.665, p = 0.018) adjusted by age, sex, and height. That is, for every 1 degree that PhA increases, there is an increment of 7.76% for FEV1 and 3.25% in FVC in this population.
Our study also showed a negative association between FEV1, with TBW, ECW, IR > 0.84, and resistance adjusted by height. And a negative association of FVC with edema index > 0.47. Similar results have been observed in different studies Lui et al., found that the edema index evaluated by ECW/TBW was > 0.39 by multifrequency BIA in acute heart failure patients (20–80 years old) hospitalized in cardiogenic shock. These patients had an elevated risk of re-hospitalization related to HF (OR: 4.14, IC 95%; 1.05–15.28, p = 0.04)27. Also, Androne et al., found that blood volume increase was associated with higher pulmonary wedge pressure and mortality risk in heart failure patients with no visible edema (39% in a year)28. These data suggest that the mechanism of fluid overload may relate to redistribution rather than volume overload29,30.
Fluid overload, together with a potential increase in pulmonary capillary permeability, can result in pulmonary edema and pleural effusion, abnormalities that could at least in part explain the reported decrease in pulmonary function in end-stage renal disease patients31. In these cases, hemodialysis has been able to remove the excess fluid body. As other studies have demonstrated15, this improves pulmonary function with improved spirometric parameters before and after hemodialysis sessions associated with weight reduction32. In addition, fluid overload was also observed with significant weight increases in the periods between dialysis accompanied by declines in pulmonary function, which again improved with hemodialysis. Our study showed a similar result; trunk and abdominal IR ≥ 0.84 were inversely related to FVC.
Similarly, a congestive state is a common complication in heart failure patients, depending on the type of heart failure type. If the left ventricle is affected it is in the thorax, and abdominal when the right ventricle is responsible for hemodynamic alterations. In those patients with reduced ejection fraction or in most of the patients with concomitant COPD with preserved ejection fraction, left ventricular filling pressure is accompanied by elevated wedge pulmonary pressure with resulting engorgement of the pulmonary vasculature, bronchial vasculature, and capillaries, and fluid retention into the lung interstitial space. The outcome is “both restrictive—reductions in FVC and total lung capacity—and obstructive—reductions in peak expiratory flow and maximal mid expiratory flow (FEF25-75)”33. In experimental models with saline infusion, Brown et al. observed a reduction of airway area, suggesting that a potential increase in pulmonary capillary permeability and edema in the small bronchioles could lead to structural changes in the walls and increased airway resistance.
On the other hand, with exercise chronic heart failure patients increase their ventricular filling pressures and decompensation periods due to volume overload or redistribution, raise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and allow fluid transudation into the interstitial space with the formation of edema34.
In COPD patients, heart failure is not always recognized, even though up to 23% of them are hospitalized35, and 50% die from cardiovascular causes, more than from respiratory distress36. Moreover, pulmonary congestion during COPD exacerbations increases the risk of dying, possibly due to heart failure37. The interstitial fluid or intravascular volumes depend on many factors, including HF etiology38,39. One of them, hypoalbuminemia, is partly responsible for the peripheral congestive state common in heart failure40,41 when capillary membrane stabilization capacity through colloid osmotic properties is severely compromised42.
dditionally, there is an interaction between albumin levels with the hydrostatic pressure factors and the fluid redistribution that affect lung function and pulmonary gas exchange independent of heart failure phenotypes42,43. Accumulation of pulmonary blood volume has been associated, as in our cases, with reduced spirometric parameters and a reduced DLCO. This increase of extravascular lung water is the main pathogenic factor of diminished functional capacity44. Our findings correlate with these pathophysiological mechanisms; the IR ≥ 0.84 with a significant FEV1 reduction was similar for FVC. Moreover, in patients with an IR ≥ 0.84, the DLCO was significantly reduced compared to decreased skeletal muscle mass index, handgrip strength, albumin, and worse functional spirometric parameters. However, when the left atrial volume index was higher, meaning left ventricular filling pressures were increased, a pathophysiological scenario of pulmonary fluid overload or local redistribution would be the outcome. The decrease in DLCO levels can be multifactorial and can lead to a greater number of exacerbations and a reduction in the quality of life as well as an increase in dyspnea.
Limitations and strengths
Our first limitation is the small sample size and the fact that it is a cross-sectional study. On the other hand, important previous studies have observed that subjects with hydration status and fluid distribution disturbances assessed by BIA have a worse pulmonary function. However, these studies performance a bivariate analysis that does not evaluate whether there is an independent association between the study variables. Among the strengths of our study, this is the first study in COPD patients that evaluates the association hydration status and fluid distribution on pulmonary function performance a multivariate prediction model adjusted for confounding variables in COPD patients, which allows us to assess the effect size of water status variables on FEV1 and FVC.
Conclusions
Hydration status and fluid distribution have a significant impact on pulmonary function. Early detection of these disturbances in BIA, especially by IR and PhA, enables the early application of therapeutic strategies to improve pulmonary function in COPD patients.
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- BIA:
-
Bioelectrical impedance analysis
- COPD:
-
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- ECW:
-
Extracellular water
- ICW:
-
Intracellular water
- IR:
-
Impedance ratio
- MF-BIA:
-
Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis
- PhA:
-
Phase angle
- TBW:
-
Total body water
References
Mirza, S., Clay, R. D., Koslow, M. A. & Scanlon, P. D. COPD Guidelines: A review of the 2018 gold report. Mayo Clin. Proc. 93(10), 1488–502 (2018).
Divo, M. J. et al. COPD comorbidities network. Eur. Resp. J. 46(3), 640–50 (2015).
Singh, D. et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur. Resp. J. 53(5), 1900164 (2019).
Solanes Garcia, I. & Casan, C. P. Causes of death and prediction of mortality in COPD. Archivos de Bronconeumologia 46(7), 343–6 (2010).
Mamoto, T. et al. Relationship between exercise performance and water distribution measured by new bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 23(4), 230–5 (2003).
Maddocks, M. et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle relates to function, disease severity and prognosis in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Nutr. 34(6), 1245–1250 (2015).
de Blasio, F. et al. Evaluation of body composition in COPD patients using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 11, 2419–26 (2016).
de Blasio, F. et al. Malnutrition and sarcopenia assessment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to international diagnostic criteria, and evaluation of raw BIA variables. Respir. Med. 134, 1–5 (2018).
Souza, R. M. P. et al. Inspiratory muscle strength, diaphragmatic mobility, and body composition in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Physiotherapy Res. Int. 24(2), e1766 (2019).
de Blasio, F. et al. Raw bioelectrical impedance analysis variables are independent predictors of early all-cause mortality in patients With COPD. Chest 155(6), 1148–1157 (2019).
Kyle, U. G. et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis–part I: Review of principles and methods. Clin. Nutr. 23(5), 1226–1243 (2004).
Piccoli, A. Bioelectric impedance measurement for fluid status assessment. Contrib. Nephrol. 164, 143–152 (2010).
Earthman, C., Traughber, D., Dobratz, J. & Howell, W. Bioimpedance spectroscopy for clinical assessment of fluid distribution and body cell mass. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 22(4), 389–405 (2007).
Mamoto, T. et al. Relationship between exercise performance and water distribution measured by new bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 23(4), 230–235 (2003).
Yilmaz, S. et al. Pulmonary function in patients with end-stage renal disease: Effects of hemodialysis and fluid overload. Med. Sci. Monitor 22, 2779–84 (2016).
Vogelmeier, C. F. et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary. Respirology 22(3), 575–601 (2017).
Lohman, T.G., Roche, A.F., & Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual: Human Kinetics Books Champaign (1988.
Lukaski, H. C., Johnson, P. E., Bolonchuk, W. W. & Lykken, G. I. Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 41(4), 810–817 (1985).
Rodríguez-García, W. D. et al. Handgrip strength: Reference values and its relationship with bioimpedance and anthropometric variables. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 19, 54–58 (2017).
Miller, M. R. et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur. Respir. J. 26(2), 319–338 (2005) (PubMed PMID: 16055882).
Hankinson, J. L., Odencrantz, J. R. & Fedan, K. B. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general US population. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 159(1), 179–87 (1999).
Palamidas, A. F. et al. Impact of hemodialysis on dyspnea and lung function in end stage kidney disease patients. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 212751 (2014).
Uszko-Lencer, N. H., Bothmer, F., van Pol, P. E. & Schols, A. M. Measuring body composition in chronic heart failure: A comparison of methods. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 8(2), 208–14 (2006).
Pastan, S. & Gassensmith, C. Total body water measured by bioelectrical impedance in patients after hemodialysis: Comparison urea kinetics. ASAIO J. 38(3), M186-9 (1992).
Castillo Martinez, L. et al. Bioelectrical impedance and strength measurements in patients with heart failure: comparison with functional class. Nutrition 23(5), 412–418 (2007).
Demirci, C. et al. Impedance ratio: A novel marker and a powerful predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 48(7), 1155–62 (2016).
Liu, M. H. et al. Edema index established by a segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis provides prognostic value in acute heart failure. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 13(5), 299–306 (2012).
Androne, A. S. et al. Relation of unrecognized hypervolemia in chronic heart failure to clinical status, hemodynamics, and patient outcomes. Am. J. Cardiol. 93(10), 1254–1259 (2004).
Cotter, G., Metra, M., Milo-Cotter, O., Dittrich, H. C. & Gheorghiade, M. Fluid overload in acute heart failure-re-distribution and other mechanisms beyond fluid accumulation. Eur J. Heart Fail. 10(2), 165–169 (2008).
Castillo-Martínez, L. et al. Body composition changes assessed by bioelectrical impedance and their associations with functional class deterioration in stable heart failure patients. Nutr. Hosp. 33(3), 623–628 (2016).
Wallin, C. J., Jacobson, S. H. & Leksell, L. G. Subclinical pulmonary oedema and intermittent haemodialysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transpl. 11(11), 2269–2275 (1996).
Kovacevic, P., Stanetic, M., Rajkovaca, Z., Meyer, F. J. & Vukoja, M. Changes in spirometry over time in uremic patients receiving long-term hemodialysis therapy. Pneumologia 60(1), 36–9 (2011).
Minasian, A. G. et al. Pulmonary function impairment in patients with chronic heart failure: lower limit of normal versus conventional cutoff values. Heart Lung J. Crit. Care 43(4), 311–6 (2014).
Chase, S. C. et al. The effect of diuresis on extravascular lung water and pulmonary function in acute decompensated heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 5(2), 364–71 (2018).
Rodriguez, L. A., Wallander, M. A., Martin-Merino, E. & Johansson, S. Heart failure, myocardial infarction, lung cancer and death in COPD patients: a UK primary care study. Respir. Med. 104(11), 1691–1699 (2010).
Boudestein, L. C., Rutten, F. H., Cramer, M. J., Lammers, J. W. & Hoes, A. W. The impact of concurrent heart failure on prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 11(12), 1182–1188 (2009).
Høriseth, A. D., Omland, T., Karlsson, B. D., Brekke, P. H. & Søyseth, V. Standardized evaluation of lung congestion during COPD exacerbation better identifies patients at risk of dying. Int. J. Chronic Obstruct. Pulmonary Dis. 8, 621–629 (2013).
Miller, W. L. & Mullan, B. P. Understanding the heterogeneity in volume overload and fluid distribution in decompensated heart failure is key to optimal volume management: role for blood volume quantitation. JACC Heart Fail. 2(3), 298–305 (2014).
Miller, W. L. Fluid volume overload and congestion in heart failure: Time to reconsider pathophysiology and how volume is assessed. Circul. Heart Fail. 9(8), e002922 (2016).
Munzel, T., Gori, T., Keaney, J. F. Jr., Maack, C. & Daiber, A. Pathophysiological role of oxidative stress in systolic and diastolic heart failure and its therapeutic implications. Eur. Heart J. 36(38), 2555–2564 (2015).
Massari, F. et al. Serum biochemical determinants of peripheral congestion assessed by bioimpedance vector analysis in acute heart failure. Heart Lung J. Crit. Care. 48(5), 395–9 (2019).
Arques, S. Human serum albumin in cardiovascular diseases. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 52, 8–12 (2018).
Prenner, S. B. et al. Effect of serum albumin levels in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (from the TOPCAT Trial). Am. J. Cardiol. 125(4), 575–82 (2020).
Chase, S. C., Taylor, B. J., Cross, T. J. & Coffman, K. E. Influence of thoracic fluid compartments on pulmonary congestion. Studies. 10, 409–28 (1962).
Acknowledgements
To the Heart Failure and Respiratory Distress Clinic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: O.T.A., G.M.M., G.I.D, Data curation: G.I.D., F.C.L., G.M.M., Formal analysis: G.I.D., F.C.L. Investigation: O.T.A., G.M.M., G.I.D, F.C.L., S.S.R., K.D.C. Methodology: P.G.I., M.L.N Project administration: G.I.D, OT. A. Writing—original draft: O.T.A., G.M.M., G.I.D, F.C.L., S.S.R., P.G.I., M.L.N., R.H. R., SM. C., K.D.C., O.G.J.J. Writing—review and editing: O.T.A., G.M.M., G.I.D, F.C.L., S.S.R., P.G.I., M.L.N., R.H.R., S.M.C., K.D.C., O.G.J.J.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Orea-Tejeda, A., Gómez-Martínez, M., González-Islas, D. et al. The impact of hydration status and fluid distribution on pulmonary function in COPD patients. Sci Rep 12, 1216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05192-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05192-0