Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A novel temporary immersion bioreactor system for large scale multiplication of banana (Rasthali AAB—Silk)

Abstract

Musa sp. cultivar Rasthali (Silk AAB) is a choice variety of the Asian sub-continent. Its production and sustenance are threatened by Fusarium wilt, which affects the livelihoods of small and marginal farmers. The use of quality planting material is one of the strategies to manage the disease. Availability of quality planting material for varieties other than Grand Naine is limited. Large-scale micropropagation using existing technologies is laborious and expensive. Temporary immersion bioreactor system is emerging as a potential advancement in the micropropagation industry. In this study, a cost-effective temporary immersion bioreactor (TIB) system has been developed and an efficient micropropagation method has been standardized. Explants cultured in TIB with 250 ml of culture medium in a 2-min immersion frequency of 6 h were found to be efficient for shoot proliferation and rooting. Its efficacy has been compared with the semisolid culture method. At the end of the 6th subculture, 1496 ± 110 shoots per explant were obtained in TIB. Chlorophyll, carotenoid, stomatal index, and the number of closed stomata were examined to determine the physiological functions of the plants grown in TIB and compared with semisolid grown plantlets. Plantlets grown in TIB were genetically stable and were confirmed using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. The multiplication of shoots in TIB was 2.7-fold higher than the semisolid culture method, which is suitable for large-scale production of planting material for commercial applications.

Introduction

The Silk subgroup bananas produce unique mealy textured sweet fruits, considered as a low-cost staple food crop cultivated by large proportion of small land holding farmers in India. They are referred by different names across the globe, in India (Rasthali, NanjangudRasabale, Sabri), Bangladesh (Malbhog), Myanmar (Hta-bat), Sri Lanka (Kolikutt),Malaysia (PisangRastali), Philippines (Latundan), Vietnam (ChuoiGoong), Thailand (KluaiNam), Papua New Guinea (Worodong), Hawai ‘i (Manzano, Amorosa, Lady Finger), Australia (Sugar, Lady Finger), Florida (Apple), West Indies (Silk Fig), Tanzania (Pukusa), East Africa (Kipukusu), Latin America (Manzano), Brazil (Maça), etc1,2,3. These Silk bananas are susceptible to Fusarium wilt both race 1 and TR4, which affects the production, productivity and livelihood of farming community constantly4,5,6,7. Fusarium wilt, most destructive diseases of banana worldwide, caused by soil-borne fungus Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. cubense (Foc). It is spread through infected plant material and contaminated soil, which wiped out the Gros Michel banana industry in Central America during1950s. Presently, Cavendish cultivars are largely affected by a new strain of Foc- tropical race 4 which has spread from Southeast Asia to South Asia, Middle East, and African and Latin American countries, due to lack of effective management strategies5,6. Once a field infected by Foc, the spores survive in the soil for more than 20 years5. Thus, more emphasis should be given to ensure a Foc free banana cultivation. Banana being a vegetatively propagated crop, farmers depend on the natural regeneration of side suckers for the supply of planting materials. Infected planting material start showing symptoms from fourth month onwards and eventual crop loss8,9. The production of disease-free quality planting material is one of the main strategies to manage the spread.

Micropropagation was the first biotechnological method exploited commercially for the production of disease free, genetically uniform planting material in banana10. This technique was standardized for a wide range of Musa cultivars belonging to various ploidy and genomes11. The success of this technique depends on various factors including explant selection, culture medium and culture conditions12,13,14. The high production cost prevents small- or medium-scale laboratories with limited resources from accessing the potential benefits of plant tissue culture technology15. Recent studies have been proposed to utilize automated temporary immersion systems (TIS), which is less expensive and provides an optimal environment for in vitro plant cell, tissue and organ cultures with good productivity16,17,18. Over the years, several temporary immersion systems have been developed and successfully applied for in vitro propagation of banana19,20,21,22,23,24,25. Till date, reports on Silk bananas are meagre which have high commercial value in developing countries and significant contribution in local economy. This team has developed a temporary immersion bioreactor (TIB)made up of borosilicate glass which can be customized and fabricated as per the culture requirements. This experiment is to study the efficiency of new bioreactor for large-scale propagation of cultivar Rasthali (Silk AAB).

Results

Optimization of culture parameters for shoot multiplication in TIB system

The 3rd sub-cultured shoot tip propagules from the semi-solid (SS) medium were used as the initial inoculum for the TIB system to optimize the frequency of immersion, the volume of the culture medium, and inoculum density. Experiments were conducted independently with six replications to standardize each parameter and observations were taken 21 days after the initiation of inoculum (Table 1). To standardize the frequency of immersion, the explants were exposed to liquid media for 2 min for every 4 h, 6 h and 12 h interval. A significant number of shoots per explant was obtained in the immersion frequency of once in 6 h (24.2 shoots/explant), followed by 12 h intervals (18.6 shoots/explant). Similarly, to optimize the volume of media required for the TIB culture system, 100 ml, 250 ml and 500 ml of the liquid medium was used and the maximum number of shoots per explant was observed in 250 ml medium (24 shoots) followed by 500 ml and 100 ml with no significant differences between them. The number of explants required to produce maximum number of shoots have been standardized using various inoculum densities (3, 6 and 12) per system. An average of 24 shoots/explant was obtained from the system with the explant density of 3 and 6 followed by 12. The efficiency of shoot formation in TIB system was enhanced in the range of 1.8 to 2.7 times (16.6 to 24.4 shoots per explant) than the existing shoot tip culture in SS medium (9 shoots per explants). This result revealed that the optimum culture condition for the TIB system for shoot multiplication is: 250 ml of medium, 6 h immersion frequency with 6 explants/bioreactor.

Table 1 Effect of the culture systems on immersion frequency, volume of culture medium and inoculum density on multiplication shoots per explant.

Efficiency of TIB system on shoot multiplication

For large scale multiplication of shoots, three more subcultures were carried out in the TIB system with the optimized protocol by splitting shoot clusters up to 2 to 4 portions (2 cm3 used as explant).Number of shoots produced per explant was recorded at the time of each subculture and found that there is no significant difference between the sub cultures. An average of 24 and 9 shoots were produced in each explant per subculture in TIB and SS system respectively (Fig. 1). At the end of 6th subculture, 1496 ± 110 shoots per explant were obtained in TIB.

Figure 1
figure1

Effect of subcultures on production of multiple shoots in TIB. Experiment carried out with 250 ml of culture medium and 6 numbers of inoculum used and 2-min immersion for every 6 h. results were recorded after 21 days of culture period. (Graph was generated using OriginLab Professional Version 2021b software; URL link: www.OriginLab.com/2021b).

Optimization of culture parameters for rootingin TIB system

To optimize the immersion frequency and volume of the rooting medium, the proliferated shoot clusters in TIB were replaced with the rooting medium. TIB system performed well for shoot elongation, rooting percentage, and root length than the cultures grown in SS medium. It was observed that shoot height was significantly higher in the TIB system in all the parameters tested than SS system. The root length was significantly high in immersion frequency of 12 h followed by 6 h, then semi-solid grown plants. However, the root length was not affected by the volume of the medium used. The rooting percentage and the number of roots per shoot were not influenced by the immersion frequency and volume of the culture medium, but it is significantly higher in TIB than SS system. These results revealed that 250 ml of rooting medium with the immersion frequency at 6hinterval is optimum for rooting in TIB (Table 2).

Table 2 Effect of the culture system, immersion frequency, and volume of culture medium on rooting, and shoot elongation.

Physio-chemical changes of culture medium

The change in the physicochemical parameters (pH, EC and TDS) were recorded during the culture period in the shooting and rooting medium of the TIB system. A sudden decrease in pH (from 5.8 to 5.4) was recorded during 0–7 days of initiation, which was gradually increased thereafter and reached 6.2 on 28th day of inoculation. However, a gradual decrease in EC and TDS was recorded upon prolonged culture duration. Unlike shooting medium, the pH, EC and TDS were gradually decreased in the rooting medium (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Physio-chemical changes in the media during the culture period in TIB (Graphs were generated using OriginLab Professional Version 2021b software; URL link: www.OriginLab.com/2021b).

Effect of culture systems on acclimatization of plantlets in hardening

The survival rate of tissue culture plantlets derived from TIB and SS systems were compared during primary and secondary hardening stages as well as field planting. Significant difference in the survival rate was observed at primary and secondary hardening stages whereas no significant difference was observed at field establishment (Fig. 3). The survival rate of plantlets derived from SS system and TIB in secondary hardening was 84.3% and 95.3% respectively, while at primary hardening 93.6% in SS and 95.3% in TIB and in field conditions 96.6% in SS and 98.3% in TIB (Fig. 4).

Figure 3
figure3

Effect of culture system on survival of plantlets in acclimatization. (Graph was generated using OriginLab Professional Version 2021b software; URL link: www.OriginLab.com/2021b).

Figure 4
figure4

Hardening of plantlets. (a) Plantlets produced from bioreactor, (b) primary hardened plants, (c) SECONDARY hardened plants (Images arranged in Adobe Photoshop CS3).

Analysis of photosynthetic pigments, stomatal index and closed stomata

The synthesis of photosynthetic pigments and density of stomata in leaves sampled from in vitro, primary and secondary hardened plants grown in TIB and SS system were evaluated to determine photosynthetic functions and results are presented in Fig. 5. Chlorophyll a, b, a/b ratio and carotenoid contents were significantly higher in plants grown in TIB under in vitro condition. During primary hardening, the chlorophyll a and b did not differ significantly in both TIB and SS systems. However, chlorophyll a/b ratio and total carotenoids were significantly higher in TIB than in SS during both primary and secondary hardening. Chlorophyll a content was higher during secondary hardening in semisolid grown plantlets than TIB and no significant change observed in chlorophyll b in both. Stomatal density is a function of both number of stomata and the size of the epidermal cells. Stomatal density is affected mainly by the initiation of stomata and the expansion of epidermal cells (density of epidermal cell), which is a function of variables like light, temperature and water status. The stomatal index in in vitro and primary hardened plants of TIB was significantly higher than SS system and no difference was observed during secondary hardened plants of both TIB and SS systems. Closed stomata prevent water loss, and more number of closed stomata (75%) were observed in TIB grown plant during in vitro conditions than semisolid grown (22.1%), however this number did not vary significantly during primary and secondary hardening of plants from TIB and SS culture conditions.

Figure 5
figure5

Change in chlorophyll a, b and ratio, carotenoid content, stomatal index and number of closed stomata in leaves of banana plantlets during the harvest from in vitro culture, primary and secondary hardening. (a) Chlorophyll a, (b) Chlorophyll b, (c) Chlorophyll a/b ratio, (d) Total carotenoid, (e) stomatal index, (f) Closed stomata (Graphs were generated using OriginLab Professional Version 2021b software; URL link: www.OriginLab.com/2021b).

ISSR analysis

PCR amplifications using eleven ISSR primers were performed for DNA isolated from leaf samples of plants grown in SS and TIB systems to access genetic integrity. All the primers produced clear and 94 scorable bands ranging in size from 500 to 6000 bp (Table 3). These analyses clearly indicated that there were no polymorphic bands in all the samples processed with the control plants (Fig. 6 and see supplementary file).

Table 3 List of ISSR primers used for assessment of genetic fidelity.
Figure 6
figure6

ISSR amplification pattern of plantlets grown in semisolid medium (Lane 1 and 2) and TIB (Lane 3–5) generated using primer (Lane C: Field grown control sample; Lane M: 500 bp Ladder). Leaves sample (randomly chosen 10 different plants pooled as one sample) collected performed the experiment with total of 50 plants.

Discussion and conclusion

The use of temporary immersion system has been reported to improve the shoot multiplication in banana18,19,21and other monocot crops such as sugarcane26, pineapple27 and date palm28. There are different types of temporary immersion bioreactor systems available commercially (RITA®, SETIS™, Ebb-and-Flow, TIB®, and MATIS®) and have been utilized for in vitro propagation of banana plants18,19. The culture parameters such as immersion time, frequency, volume of media and inoculum density play a significant role in shoot multiplication, As the nutrient uptake, gas exchange and hyperhydricity control varies among species21,29,30, the culture parameters need to be standardized.

An indigenous temporary immersion bioreactor system has been developed and the protocol has been optimized for shoot multiplication using the explants of 3rd subculture from semi-solid medium (Fig. 7). The explants cultured in TIB with 250 ml of culture medium in 2-min immersion frequency for every 6 h was found to be efficient for shoot multiplication. As reported earlier the most decisive parameter for shoot proliferation includes duration of immersion and volume of nutrient medium31. Roels et al.21 and Roels et al.22 stated that 10 ml of medium per explant influenced the shoot multiplication in plantain banana. Ayub et al.32 observed that an optimum volume of culture medium significantly increases shoots per explant in micropropagation of blackberry. Ramos-Castellá et al.33 described that 25 ml of media per explant increases the shoot multiplication in Vanila planifolia. Zhang et al.34 reported that the plantlet growth and morphology is substantially influenced by inoculum density in bioreactor system developed for Bletilla striata.

Figure 7
figure7

Micropropagation of banana cv. Rasthali in temporary immersion bioreactor. (A) Multiple shoots in semisolid culture system. (B) Multiple shoots in TIB system. (C) Multiple shoot cluster grown in semisolid medium. (D) Multiple shoot cluster grown in TIB system. (E) Mass multiplied plantlets in TIB system. (F) Rooted plantlets in TIB (Images arranged in Adobe Photoshop CS3).

This TIB system has the capacity to produce 2.7-fold shoot multiplication rate than SS system at the end of the 6th subculture. Roels et al.21 observed significant difference in multiple shoot production between subcultures, 5th and 6th were significantly higher than in subcultures 8th, 9th and 10th in plantain banana using temporary immersion system. However, Mendes et al.35 reported a decrease in multiplication rate of Musa cv. Maçã (AAB) in semisolid medium after the fourth subculture. In the present study, no significant variation was observed in the multiplication rate between the subcultures. However, it should be noted that multiple shoot production will vary significantly among the genotypes.

TIB system showed superior response in shoot height, root initiation percent, number of roots per shoot and root length. Similar observations were reported in plantain banana, plantlets grown in TIB exhibited better growth, higher photosynthetic rate, improved rooting and longer elongated shoots compared to plantlets grown in semisolid medium24. The positive effects of TIB on shoot growth have been demonstrated by many authors in earlier studies19,36. In the present study, the immersion frequency of 2 min for every 6 h interval, and 250 ml of rooting medium were found optimum for rooting and shoot elongation. Similarly, Wilken et al.25 described, rooting of plantlets with the use of two types of 5 L TIBs with 1 min immersion in every 6 h for cv. Grand Naine was found to be efficient. Contrarily, Bello-Bello et al.18 reported that the cv. Grand Naine plantlets survived well without requirement of separate rooting stage. In the present study, rooted shoots were observed during multiplication stage and most of them were only primary roots (Fig. 7F). Absence of lateral roots and root hair formation affect the uptake of nutrients during the acclimatization stage and results in poor survival37. The lateral root production ability relies on the interaction of many external and internal factors particularly addition of auxins and other elements of culture media used in the rooting stage38. Hence, for the development of primary and lateral roots, the nutrient reservoir was replaced with rooting media and the plantlets produced both primary (Fig. 7F) and lateral roots (Fig. 8B) with adequate root hairs which helped in the survival of the plantlets during the hardening and. Furthermore, the plantlets produced in TIB from all experiments did not show any symptom of phenotypic plasticity, necrosis, chlorosis and hyperhydricity. Rooting efficiency was significantly improved in other crops like hybrid hazelnut grown in temporary immersion system compared to semi-solid medium after four weeks of culture in rooting medium39. Other comparable advantages of TIB over in vitro grown plants from semisolid medium, the roots need cleaning to remove the gelling agents often damage the roots and increase the chance of infection. This also contributed for reduced survival rate in the primary hardening stage40. TIS has the advantage of reduced the mortality rate at primary hardening.TIB grown plants exhibited higher survival percentage both in primary and secondary hardening with no significant difference in field survival. A similar observation was recorded by several authors for the plantlets obtained from the TIB to that of semisolid culture system18,23,24,30.

Figure 8
figure8

Scanning electron microscopic images. (A) Paracytic oblique type of stomata in TIB grown plantlets. (B) Lateral roots of TIB grown plants.

The physio-chemical parameters of media were recorded to understand the nutrient requirement of the plants grown in TIB41. A decrease in pH of the culture medium was observed on 7th day followed by gradual increase. Decrease in pH could be attributed to the release of oxidized phenolic compounds from cut ends of the explants initially, as observed in different liquid and semisolid cultures, and the absorption of NH4+ from the medium in exchange with intracellular H+36. Nevertheless, a steady decrease in EC and TDS was witnessed during shoot multiplication. During shoot elongation and rooting, there was a steady decrease in pH, EC and TDS was observed. Decrease in EC and TDS in TIB grown plants is mainly due to rapid uptake of nutrients at the start of the cycle, coinciding with rapid multiplication of plantlets. However, in the semisolid system, the EC was low at the beginning and increased after 7 days and dropped again, this might be due to binding of nutrients in the gel42. A similar phenomenon was reported in micropropagation of cocoyam41 and Eucalyptus clones grown in RITA® bioreactor43.

The success of TIB system not only depends on mass multiplication of plantlets but also depends on the morphological parameters and physiological functions of the plantlets produced44. Hence, the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments and density of stomata in leaf samples from in vitro, primary and secondary hardened plants were analysed. Photosynthetic pigment level (a, b, a/b ratio and carotenoid) was significantly higher in TIB than SS system. The design of the TIB permits effective transmission of light, which directly influence the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments45,46,47. The increased carotenoid content in TIB grown plants could be hypothesized as drought response triggered by the periodical supply of liquid nutrient. Carotenoid biosynthesis is regulated by phytoene synthase induced in response to various factors such as light intensity, photoperiod, salt, drought, temperature and abscisic acid synthesis. Drought conditions regulate abscisic acid synthesis and induce roots for survival which might cause increased root length48,49,50. The stomatal indices were found to be significantly high in both in vitro and primary hardened plants of TIB than SS system. Under in vitro conditions, the functionality of stomata is the key physiological process in plant tissues46. Stomata are partially functional during in vitro culture condition51 and they tend to close their stomata to prevent water loss. In the present study, the number of closed stomata was significantly higher in TIB than semisolid grown plants. Stomata structure and size were studied in leaves of plants grown in TIB and SS system by scanning electron microscope and light microscope (Fig. 8A). There was no difference in stomata structure, size and observed paracytic oblique type of stomata with un-uniform development52. In TIB, when the liquid medium come in direct contact with plants along with gaseous atmosphere it stimulates the stomatal activity and contribute the conditioning of plants from in vitro to ex vitro conditions and this was reported by several authors52,53,54,56. Stomata functions are directly correlated to stomata structure and size during the in vitro growth and ex vitro survival51. However, variation of stomata morphology was also observed under different temporary immersion frequencies tested in Rhodiola crenulata45.

The sustainability of the large scale micropropagation system mainly depends on the maintenance of the genetic integrity of the plantlets57. The occurrence of genetic variation in micro-propagated banana plants mainly due to the use of a higher concentration of growth regulators and an increased number of subcultures as a response to the stress imposed on the plant during the culture period. It has been demonstrated in the form of DNA methylations, chromosome rearrangements and point mutations16,27,58,59. To access the genetic uniformity, DNA-based molecular markers of ISSR are widely used60. In the present study, only homologous amplifications were observed in samples obtained from both culture systems. Hence, the genetic integrity of plants produced through TIB suggested the suitability of the protocol followed for micropropagation of banana.

This study describes a stable and efficient large scale micropropagation of banana cv. Rasthali (AAB Silk subgroup) in the newly developed TIB system. This system enhanced the shoot multiplication by 2.7 times with a better survival (96%) during acclimatization with a minimum of variation. The plantlets grown in the TIB were genetically uniform. This TIB system with the described protocol (Fig. 9) could be extended to other banana cultivars for commercial/large-scale propagation.

Figure 9
figure9

Schematic representation of large-scale in vitro plantlet production in TIB.

Materials and methods

Plant material

In the field gene bank of ICAR-National Research Centre for Banana (NRCB), Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India, 372 Indian accessions and 124 exotic accessions are maintained. Being the National Active Germplasm Site (NAGS), all national, international guidelines and legislations are followed in performing the experimental research, field studies and collection of experimental samples. The shoot tip explants were collected from this field gene bank, the IC number allotted for Musa sp.cv. Rasthali (AAB Silk subgroup) is 250,750, and the accession number is 0297. The shoot tip explants collected were surface sterilized and cultured on semisolid MS medium52 supplemented with 4.0 mg/l 6-Benylamionopurine (BAP) and 0.2 mg/l Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) as described by Saraswathi et al.61 after the second sub-culture, the actively proliferating culture were used as explant in TIB system.

Temporary immersion bioreactor

A new TIB system was developed with two main portions: the upper portion (2000 ml capacity) used as growth chamber is for placing the explants and the lower portion (1000 ml capacity) used as nutrient reservoir for holding the liquid medium (Fig. 10). The nutrient media were supplied periodically to the growth chamber using an air compressor with the help of electronic timer switch.

Figure 10
figure10

Newly developed temporary immersion bioreactor system. (a) Nutrient reservoir, (b) growth chamber, (c) silicon stopper, (d) air compressor. (Line drawing using AutoCAD 2015 version; Image was arranged using Microsoft word).

Culture systems

The explants were cultured on TIB using MS liquid medium supplemented with 4.0 mg/l BAP, 0.2 mg/l IAA, and 30 g/l sucrose for shoot multiplication. Half strength liquid MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/l indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and 2.0 mg/l 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was used for rooting. The pH was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving at 1.2 kg/cm2 for 15 min at 120 °C. Primary hardening was carried out using pro-trays containing cocopeat wets with 1/8 MS salts. Secondary hardening was performed using grow-bags containing the mixture of vermicompost and cocopeat (1:1).

The effect of immersion frequency, volume of culture medium and number of explants (inoculum) on multiple shoot induction was examined by growing explants in TIB units containing different volumes of media 100, 250- and 500-ml and different number of explants 3, 6 and 12 for 4 weeks. Cultures were immersed with respective medium for 2 min for every 4, 6, and 12 h. After 21 days, the multiplication medium was replaced by rooting medium and evaluated the morphological characteristics of shoots, synthesis of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid content), stomatal index and number of closed stomata to determine the physiological changes in the growth environment. Explants were also cultured on semisolid medium and used as control. All the cultures were maintained at 25 ± 2 °C under a 16/8-h (light/dark) photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux of 40 μmol/m2/s1.

Shoot multiplication

The shoot tip explants were initiated aseptically and maintained for two subcultures in the semisolid multiplication medium then the proliferating cultures were sub-cultured in multiplication medium using the standardized protocol in TIB (Fig. 10). The cultures were repeatedly sub-cultured at 21 days interval up to 6th passage to examine the effect of subculture on production of shoot buds. During every subculture the number of shoots per explant were recorded for any variation in shoot multiplication. At the 6th subculture shoot buds were harvested and total number of regenerated shoot buds were recorded.

Physico-chemical parameters of culture media

The media was collected from the bioreactor at regular intervals during the culture period and tested for pH, electrical conductivity (EC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) using a tester (Hanna instruments, USA) to determine the changes in the media components during the course of growth development in TIB.

Acclimatization of plantlets

After 4 weeks in rooting, the rooted shoots were harvested from the bioreactor unit/culture bottle and the roots were washed in sterile distilled water to remove all traces of media elements. Then the shoots were primary hardened under 80–85% relative humidity (for 21 days). These plantlets were irrigated weekly twice. By the end of three weeks, the plantlets were transferred to net house for secondary hardening (for 28 days).

Estimation of photosynthetic pigments and, stomatal index

Estimation of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid content), stomatal index and number of closed stomata were carried out to determine the physiological functions of the plants grown in bioreactor and semisolid culture. Leaf samples were collected in different stages viz. in vitro (after rooting, at the time of harvest from TIB and SS), primary and secondary hardened stages and processed for the estimation. The chlorophyll content was estimated according to the method of Burnison62 with minor modifications. The absorbance was measured at 663 nm (chlorophyll a), 645 nm (chlorophyll b) and 480 nm (carotenoids) using VS 2100 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Chemito Instruments Pvt. Ltd.).

$$ {\text{Chlorophyll}}\;{\text{a}}\;\left( {{\text{mg}}/{\text{g}}\;{\text{tissue}}} \right) = \left( {{12}.{7}\left( {{\text{A663}}} \right) - {2}.{69}\left( {{\text{A645}}} \right)} \right) \times \frac{v}{{1000{ } \times w}} $$
$$ {\text{Chlorophyll}}\;{\text{b}}\;\left( {{\text{mg}}/{\text{g tissue}}} \right) = \left( {{22}.{9}\left( {{\text{A645}}} \right) - {4}.{68}\left( {{\text{A645}}} \right)} \right) \times \frac{v}{{1000{ } \times w}} $$
$$ {\text{Carotenoid}}\;\left( {{\text{mg}}/{\text{g tissue}}} \right) = \left( {{\text{A48}}0 - 0.{144}} \right) \times \, \left( {{\text{A663}}} \right) - \left( {0.{638}} \right) \times \left( {{\text{A645}}} \right) \times \frac{v}{1000 \times w} $$

Estimation of stomatal index and number of closed stomata were carried out as described byXu and Zhou63. The abaxial epidermis of the leaf was cleaned and smeared with nail varnish in the mid area of the leaf and dried at room temperature for 20 min. The thin film was peeled off from the leaf surface and mounted on a glass slide, immediately covered with a cover slip with slight pressure. Number of stomata (s) and epidermal cells (e) for each slide were counted under optical microscope with 10 × and 40 × view. The total number of stomata, numbers of closed stomata per square millimetre were counted. The leaf stomatal index (SI) was estimated using the formula

$$SI=\left(\frac{s}{(s+e)}\right)*100$$

Sample preparation for scanning electron microscopy

The sampled leaves were prepared for SEM analysis as described by Zakaria and Razak64, with minor modifications. Fresh leaves were collected from the in vitro grown plants and fixed immediately in Bouin’s fixative65. The leaf samples were kept under vacuum for 4 h and then washed with 1% cacodylate buffer. Post-fixation was done using 1% cacodylate buffered Osmium tetroxide for 2 h. After fixation, samples were dehydrated with graded series of ethanol to absolute ethanol (50% ethanol for 5 min, 70% ethanol for 30 min, 90% ethanol for 30 min, absolute alcohol for 30 min, and each step in two changes at room temperature of 26 ± 2 °C and dried). The dehydrated samples were mounted onto aluminium stubs, coated with a thin layer of gold in an auto sputter fine coater (JFC 1600, Jeol, Japan) and visualized using Scanning Electron Microscope (VEGA-TESCAN-LMU).

Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis

The genomic DNA from TIB system and semisolid medium grown plantlets were isolated by CTAB method using the protocol of Gawel and Jarret66 with minor modifications. The concentration of DNA was measured using ColibriMicrovolume spectrophotometer (Titertek-Berthold, Germany). Prior to PCR amplification, the DNA integrity was checked using 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. The genetic stability analysis was performed with 11 ISSR primers (Table 3).

ISSR reaction was carried out with 25 µl PCR reaction performed in a LabnetMultigene™ Opt Max gradient master cycler (Labnet International Inc., Edison, NJ, USA) containing 187.5 ng of DNA, 12.5 µl of Taq 2 × master mix RED (Ampliqon, Denmark) with 25 pmol of different primers. ISSR amplification was programmed for initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 0.30 min, annealing at primer-specific temperatures for 0.30 min, extension at 72 °C for 2 min and final extension at 72 °C for 10.0 min. All the PCRs were repeated three times, using the same conditions to check the accuracy of the amplified products. Amplified products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.25 μg/ml ethidium bromide (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using 1 × TAE (Tris Acetate EDTA) buffer along with 500 bp ladder. The profile was visualized under UV transilluminator and then documented using gel documentation system (Medicare GELSTAN), only clear and scorable DNA bands were considered for the analysis.

Statistical analysis

All the experiments were laid out in a completely randomised design with six replicates each and repeated thrice. The data obtained were processed statistically with IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 21) software by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and DMRT (p ≤ 0.05) was performed.

References

  1. 1.

    Stover, R. H. & Simmonds, N. W. Bananas (Longman Scientific & Technical, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Singh, H. P., Uma, S. & Sathiamoorthy, S. A Tentative Key for Identification and Classification of Indian Bananas (National Research Centre for banana (ICAR), 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ploetz, R. C., Kepler, A. K., Daniells, J. & Nelson, S. C. Banana and plantain: An overview with emphasis on Pacific island cultivars. Species Profiles Pac. Island Agrofor. 1, 21–32 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pegg, K. G., Coates, L. M., O’Neill, W. T. & Turner, D. W. The epidemiology of fusarium wilt of banana. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1–19 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dita, M., Barquero, M., Heck, D., Mizubuti, E. S. G. & Staver, C. P. Fusarium wilt of banana: Current knowledge on epidemiology and research needs toward sustainable disease management. Front. Plant Sci. 91, 1468 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    FAO. The Global Programme on Banana Fusarium Wilt Disease (Programme Summary) Protecting Banana Production from the Disease with Focus on Tropical Race 4 (TR4). 8 http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/fcc/web_programmesummary_PRINT.pdf (2017).

  7. 7.

    Anis, M. & Ahmad, N. Plant Tissue Culture: Propagation, Conservation and Crop Improvement (Springer, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rishbeth, J. Fusarium wilt of bananas in Jamaica: II. Some apsects of host-parasite relationships. Ann. Bot. 21, 215–245 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Su, H. J., Hwang, S. C. & Ko, W. H. Fusarial wilt of cavendish Bananas in Taiwan. Plant Dis. 70, 814–818 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cardoso, J. C., Sheng Gerald, L. T. & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. Micropropagation in the twenty-first century. In Methods in Molecular Biology (Springer, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sathiamoorthy, S., Uma, S., Selvarajan, R. & Shyam, B. Multiplication of Virus-Free Banana Plants Through Shoot Tip Culture. Technical Bulletin No.3 (National Research Centre for Banana (ICAR), 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Muhammad, A., Hussain, I., Saqlan Naqvi, S. M. & Rashid, H. Banana plantlet production through tissue culture. Pak. J. Bot. 36, 617–620 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kodym, A. & Zapata-Arias, F. J. Low-cost alternatives for the micropropagation of banana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 66, 67–71 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nandwani, D., Zehr, U., Zehr, B. E. & Barwale, R. B. Mass propagation and ex vitro survival of banana cv. ‘Basrai’ through tissue culture. Gartenbauwissenschaft 65, 237–240 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Saraswathi, M. S. et al. Cost-effective tissue culture media for large-scale propagation of three commercial banana (Musa spp.) varieties. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 91, 23–29 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jekayinoluwa, T. et al. Agromorphologic, genetic and methylation profiling of Dioscorea and Musa species multiplied under three micropropagation systems. PLoS ONE 14, 1–17 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    FAO and IAEA Proceedings of a technical meeting organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA division of nuclear techniques in food and agriculture and held in Vienna, 26–30 August 2002. In Low Cost Options for Tissue Culture Technology in Developing Countries 26–30 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bello-Bello, J. J., Cruz-Cruz, C. A. & Pérez-Guerra, J. C. A new temporary immersion system for commercial micropropagation of banana (Musa AAA cv. Grand Naine). In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 55, 313–320 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Alvard, D., Cote, F. & Teisson, C. Comparison of methods of liquid medium culture for banana micropropagation: Effects of temporary immersion of explants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 32, 55–60 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Teisson, C. & Alvard, D. A new concept of plant. In In vitro Cultivation Liquid Medium: Temporary Immersion 105–110 (Springer, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Roels, S. et al. Optimization of plantain (Musa AAB ) micropropagation by temporary immersion system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 82, 57–66 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Roels, S. et al. The effect of headspace renewal in a Temporary Immersion Bioreactor on plantain (Musa AAB) shoot proliferation and quality. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 84, 155–163 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Aragón, C. E. et al. Photosynthesis and carbon metabolism in plantain (Musa AAB) plantlets growing in temporary immersion bioreactors and during ex vitro acclimatization. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 41, 550–554 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aragón, C. E. et al. Comparison of plantain plantlets propagated in temporary immersion bioreactors and gelled medium during in vitro growth and acclimatization. Biol. Plant. 58, 29–38 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wilken, D. et al. Effect of immersion systems, lighting, and TIS designs on biomass increase in micropropagating banana (Musa spp. cv ‘Grande naine’ AAA). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 50, 582–589 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mordocco, A. M., Brumbley, J. A. & Prakash, L. Development of a temporary immersion system (RITA®) for mass production of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. interspecific hybrids). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 45, 450–457 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Escalona, M. et al. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Rep. 18, 743–748 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Othmani, A., Bayoudh, C., Drira, N. & Trifi, M. In vitro cloning of date palm phoenix dactylifera l., cv. Deglet bey by using embryogenic suspension and temporary immersion bioreactor (tib). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 23, 1181–1188 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Georgiev, V., Schumann, A., Pavlov, A. & Bley, T. Temporary immersion systems in plant biotechnology. Eng. Life Sci. 14, 607–621 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Martínez-Estrada, E., Islas-Luna, B., Pérez-Sato, J. A. & Bello-Bello, J. J. Temporary immersion improves in vitro multiplication and acclimatization of Anthurium andreanum Lind. Sci. Hortic. 249, 185–191 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Etienne, H. & Berthouly, M. Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 69, 215–231 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ayub, R. A. et al. Sucrose concentration and volume of liquid medium on the in vitro growth and development of blackberry cv. Tupy in temporary immersion systems. Cienc. Agrotecnol. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054201943007219 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ramos-Castellá, A., Iglesias-Andreu, L. G., Bello-Bello, J. & Lee-Espinosa, H. Improved propagation of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews) using a temporary immersion system. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 50, 576–581 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang, B. et al. Optimizing factors affecting development and propagation of Bletilla striata in a temporary immersion bioreactor system. Sci. Hortic. 232, 121–126 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mendes, B. M. J., Filippi, S. B., Demétrio, C. G. B. & Rodriguez, A. P. M. A statistical approach to study the dynamics of micropropagation rates, using banana (Musa spp.) as an example. Plant Cell Rep. 18, 967–971 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Banthorpe, D. V. & Brown, G. D. Growth and secondary metabolism in cell cultures of Tanacetum, Mentha and Anethum species in buffered media. Plant Sci. 67, 107–113 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sekeli, R., Abdullah, J. O., Namasivayam, P., Muda, P. & Bakar, U. K. A. Better rooting procedure to enhance survival rate of field grown malaysian eksotika papaya transformed with 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase gene. ISRN Biotechnol. 2013, 1–13 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Arab, M. M. et al. Modeling and optimizing a new culture medium for in vitro rooting of G×N15 prunus rootstock using artificial neural network-genetic algorithm. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–18 (2018).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nicholson, J., Shukla, M. R. & Saxena, P. K. In vitro rooting of hybrid hazelnuts (Corylus avellana × corylus americana) in a temporary immersion system. Botany 98, 343–352 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Simonton, W., Robacker, C. & Krueger, S. A programmable micropropagation apparatus using cycled liquid medium. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 27, 211–218 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Niemenak, N., Noah, A. M. & Omokolo, D. N. Micropropagation of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott) in temporary immersion bioreactor. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 7, 383–390 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    McAlister, B., Finnie, J., Watt, M. P. & Blakeway, F. Use of the temporary immersion bioreactor system (RITA®) for production of commercial Eucalyptus clones in Mondi Forests (SA). Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 81, 347–358 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ramírez-Mosqueda, M. A., Iglesias-Andreu, L. G., Ramírez-Madero, G. & Hernández-Rincón, E. U. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. in temporary immersion systems and evaluation of genetic fidelity. S. Afr. J. Bot. 106, 238–243 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Martre, P., Lacan, D., Just, D. & Teisson, C. Physiological effects of temporary immersion on Hevea brasiliensis callus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 67, 25–35 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhao, Y., Sun, W., Wang, Y., Saxena, P. K. & Liu, C. Z. Improved mass multiplication of Rhodiola crenulata shoots using temporary immersion bioreactor with forced ventilation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 166, 1480–1490 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Tomlinson, P. B. Development of the stomatal complex as a taxonomic character in the monocotyledons. Taxon 23, 109–128 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Batista, D. S. et al. Light quality in plant tissue culture: Does it matter?. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 54, 195–215 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kaur, N. et al. Regulation of banana phytoene synthase (MaPSY) expression, characterization and their modulation under various abiotic stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 462 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nisar, N., Li, L., Lu, S., Khin, N. C. & Pogson, B. J. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol. Plant 8, 68–82 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Harvey, B. M. R., Selby, C. & Bowden, G. Stimulation of rooting in vitro: Effects of inhibitors of abscisic acid synthesis. In Physiology, Growth and Development of Plants in Culture (eds Lumsden, P. J. et al.) (Springer, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hazarika, B. N. Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture of plants. Sci. Hortic. 108, 105–120 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473–497 (1962).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ramírez-Mosqueda, M. A., Cruz-Cruz, C. A., Cano-Ricárdez, A. & Bello-Bello, J. J. Assessment of different temporary immersion systems in the micropropagation of anthurium (Anthurium andreanum). Biotech 9, 3–9 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Aliniaeifard, S. & Van Meeteren, U. Stomatal characteristics and desiccation response of leaves of cut chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) flowers grown at high air humidity. Sci. Hortic. 205, 84–89 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Monja-Mio, K. M., Pool, F. B., Herrera, G. H., EsquedaValle, M. & Robert, M. L. Development of the stomatal complex and leaf surface of Agave angustifolia Haw. ‘Bacanora’ plantlets during the in vitro to ex vitro transition process. Sci. Hortic. 189, 32–40 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Maleki Asayesh, Z., Vahdati, K., Aliniaeifard, S. & Askari, N. Enhancement of ex vitro acclimation of walnut plantlets through modification of stomatal characteristics in vitro. Sci. Hortic. 220, 114–121 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Thomas, B. F. & ElSohly, M. A. The botany of Cannabis sativa L. In The Analytical Chemistry of Cannabis 1–26 (Elsevier, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bhatia, S. & Sharma, K. Technical glitches in micropropagation. In Modern Applications of Plant Biotechnology in Pharmaceutical Sciences (Elsevier, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Rout, G. R., Senapati, S. K., Aparajita, S. & Palai, S. K. Studies on genetic identification and genetic fidelity of cultivated banana using ISSR markers. Plant Omics J. Southern Cross J. 2, 250–285 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Venkatachalam, L., Sreedhar, R. V. & Bhagyalakshmi, N. Genetic analyses of micropropagated and regenerated plantlets of banana as assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 43, 267–274 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Saraswathi, M. S. et al. Assessing the robustness of IRAP and RAPD marker systems to study intra-group diversity among cavendish (AAA) clones of banana. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 86, 7–12 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Burnison, B. K. Modified dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) extraction for chlorophyll analysis of phytoplankton. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 729–733 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Xu, Z. & Zhou, G. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 3317–3325 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zakaria, W. & Razak, A. R. SEM study of the morphology of leaves of four dessert banana cultivars (Musa spp. Cv. ‘Intan’, ‘Jari Buaya’, ‘Novaria’ and ‘Raja Udang Merah’) in Malaysia. J. Trop. Agric. Food Sci. 27, 151–158 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zakaria, W. & Razak, A. R. The SEM of the surface features of dessert banana peel (Musa spp., AA and AAA groups). In Proc. First Asean Microscopy Confence November 27–30, 1997, Senai, Johor, Malaysia (eds Razak, A. R. et al.) 120–123. (Electron Microscopy Society Malaysia, 1997).

  66. 66.

    Gawel, N. J. & Jarret, R. L. A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure for Musa and Ipomoea. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9, 262 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Indian Council of Agricultural Research- Extramural Research Project (HS/7(9)/2016/HS-I).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.U. and R.K. conceived the concept and designed the experiments. R.K. and S.K. conducted the experiments and analyzed the results. R.K. created/generated the figures and graphs. S.U. and S.B. analyzed the results and monitored the research work. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subbaraya Uma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uma, S., Karthic, R., Kalpana, S. et al. A novel temporary immersion bioreactor system for large scale multiplication of banana (Rasthali AAB—Silk). Sci Rep 11, 20371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99923-4

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing