Particulate respirators such as N95s are an essential component of personal protective equipment (PPE) for front-line workers. This study describes a rapid and effective UVC irradiation system that would facilitate the safe re-use of N95 respirators and provides supporting information for deploying UVC for decontamination of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. To assess the inactivation potential of the proposed UVC germicidal device as a function of time by using 3 M 8211-N95 particulate respirators inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. A germicidal UVC device to deliver tailored UVC dose was developed and test coupons (2.5 cm2) of the 3 M-N95 respirator were inoculated with 106 plaque-forming units (PFU) of SARS-CoV-2 and were UV irradiated. Different exposure times were tested (0–164 s) by fixing the distance between the lamp and the test coupon to 15.2 cm while providing an exposure of at least 5.43 mWcm−2. Primary measure of outcome was titration of infectious virus recovered from virus-inoculated respirator test coupons after UVC exposure. Other measures included the method validation of the irradiation protocol, using lentiviruses (biosafety level-2 agent) and establishment of the germicidal UVC exposure protocol. An average of 4.38 × 103 PFU ml−1 (SD 772.68) was recovered from untreated test coupons while 4.44 × 102 PFU ml−1 (SD 203.67), 4.00 × 102 PFU ml−1 (SD 115.47), 1.56 × 102 PFU ml−1 (SD 76.98) and 4.44 × 101 PFU ml−1 (SD 76.98) was recovered in exposures 2, 6, 18 and 54 s per side respectively. The germicidal device output and positioning was monitored and a minimum output of 5.43 mW cm−2 was maintained. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 was not detected by plaque assays (minimal level of detection is 67 PFU ml−1) on N95 respirator test coupons when irradiated for 120 s per side or longer suggesting 3.5 log reduction in 240 s of irradiation, 1.3 J cm−2. A scalable germicidal UVC device to deliver tailored UVC dose for rapid decontamination of SARS-CoV-2 was developed. UVC germicidal irradiation of N95 test coupons inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 for 120 s per side resulted in 3.5 log reduction of virus. These data support the reuse of N95 particle-filtrate apparatus upon irradiation with UVC and supports use of UVC-based decontamination of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the severe-acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This respiratory pathogen belonging to the beta-coronavirus group emerged at the end of 2019 in the city of Wuhan, Hubei province, China1. As of late March 2021, SARS-CoV-2 infected ~ 124 million individuals while accounting for more than 2.5 million deaths worldwide2. So far, the United States of America is one of the hardest hit countries worldwide. The long-term public health and economic consequences are alarming and are often compared to the “Spanish-flu” pandemic caused by an influenza virus in 1918 that resulted in more deaths than victims in World War I3.
During pandemic outbreaks, frontline workers and essential workers across a spectrum of industries including but not limited to medical professionals, scientists, academics, as well as individuals within food and beverage industries, are required to carry out pivotal duties to keep society functioning. Critical measures employed to prevent the spread of the disease include avoiding social interactions through social distancing and lockdowns in combination with improved hygiene measures. Additionally, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as masks, gloves, sleeves and face-shields play an essential role in protecting front line workers as well as minimizing the spread of the respiratory pathogen SARS-CoV-24. SARS-CoV-2 can spread in aerosol droplets that are formed when an infected person coughs, sneezes or speaks. Advanced filtering facepiece respirators (FFR), such as N95, KN95 and N99 are used as a measure of personal protection when enhanced exposure risk to SARS-CoV-2 is expected, including within patient care settings or diagnostic and research laboratories. As the extent of this pandemic resulted in the long-anticipated shortage of FFR and other facemasks, the need for more PPE supplies across the world escalated significantly5. Such a situation negatively impacted healthcare settings, putting frontline workers in a vulnerable position, potentially resulting in a collapse of the healthcare system. This was further corroborated by the World Health Organization (WHO) stating that insufficient supply of such PPEs would put essential frontline workers at the risk of being exposed to SARS-CoV-2, which would further facilitate the spread of this contagious disease6. As a measure to address this issue, methods to conserve PPE were discussed by panelists from the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) including the suggested reuse of PPE7.
Several factors must be taken into consideration when evaluating the suggested reuse of respirators. First, it is important to have a general idea of the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces. Several studies have demonstrated that viruses such as SARS-CoV and its phylogenetic-relatives such as Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome virus (MERS) and seasonal coronaviruses (HCoV) may persist on inanimate object surfaces including wood, plastic, metal, paper and glass up to 9 days8,9. However, the stability of the virus on surfaces is greatly dependent on other factors such as temperature, humidity and the presence of other proteins in viral droplets10,11,12,13,14. In contrast, a recent study suggested that SARS-CoV-2 is only able to last on such surfaces more or less up to 72 h and in some cases up to 28 days based on external factors mentioned above14,15. Given the variability of SARS-CoV-2 viral survivorship on different surfaces and the close, long-term contact of reused respirators with the face, a scalable, reliable, cost-effective disinfection procedure that would enable the safe reuse of PPE is of global interest11.
Several methods of decontamination have been proposed to facilitate the reuse of PPEs. These typically branch off from chemical methods (i.e., alcohol, bleach, etc.) or energetic methods such as heat inactivation, microwave-based systems or ultraviolet (UV) based systems11. In summary, chemical based inactivation methods have indicated that virus contaminated surfaces can be effectively decontaminated using 70% ethanol, bleach solutions (0.1% Sodium Hypochlorite) and hydrogen peroxide (0.5% H2O2) with enough exposure time12. The issues with these methods include inability to scale up to disinfect a large number of units and the need for specialized competencies to work with chemical supplies. Furthermore, several chemical treatment methods have been shown to impair the functionality of the filters found in respirators16. In contrast, energy-based systems have also been explored for decontaminating PPEs. One category of methods suggested was heat inactivation in which various protocols such as heating to 70 °C for 24 h or heating for 30 min at 56 °C depending on the model implemented17,18. This method is limited in applicability to a subset of respirators belonging to the FFP2 category since most manufacturers recommend against heat treatment due to deleterious effects on the respirator materials which could lead to ineffective protective capacity16,19.
Another energy-based decontamination method is the use of germicidal UVC (200–280 nm) based systems20. UVC based disinfection methods are effective since viral genetic materials such as RNA (relevant in this case given that SARS-CoV-2 genome is an RNA based one) and DNA strongly absorbs UVC radiation21,22. This results in microbial genetic damage at a molecular and structural level (via photodimerization), severely compromising the functionality of the virus leading to viral inactivation, consequently prohibiting the capacity for the virus to replicate upon exposure to compatible hosts20,23. Germicidal properties of UVC on PPE and FFRs such as N95s have been studied in the context of other respiratory viral pathogens such as influenza A viruses24,25. In particular, the use of UVC lamps to disinfect FFR has been studied by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and found that FFR retained good filtering and air flow properties using UVC exposures that would far exceed those used to disinfect FFR. This indicates UVC irradiation methods have the potential to be highly effective, point-of-use disinfection systems26. UVC radiation is a line-of-sight disinfection system and pathogens in the shadows or shielded from the UVC radiation can remain viable unless reflective UVC is sufficient for inactivation.
Here we evaluate the effectiveness of a rapid UVC germicidal disinfection system that can be scaled up to effectively inactivate SARS-CoV-2 in potentially contaminated respirators. Using test coupons of the 3 M-N95 respirator, we aimed to measure the total exposure time to UVC radiation that would result in adequate log reduction of SARS-CoV-2 to indicate the lack of infective viral particles. We further aimed to demonstrate the inactivation potential of the device by using a model non-enveloped virus. This information provides support for use of UVC-based decontamination of SARS-CoV-2 virus during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Materials and methods
UVC respirator exposure system
A simple UVC respirator exposure system was fabricated from two opposing IP55 high power mercury (Hg) lamp fixtures (American Ultraviolet, Lebanon, Indiana) configured vertically and a simple motorized conveyor system. The prototype system design moves FFR, supported vertically by the straps, between the two lamps where the dose is controlled by the belt speed of the respirator conveyor system. The concept is shown schematically below (Fig. 1A) and a prototype was built, and its mechanical operation tested (Fig. 1B).
The system shown here can expose contaminated N95 respirators at UVC dose levels up to 1.5 J cm−2 in an exposure time of approximately one minute (Fig. 1C). The total dose can be controlled by changing the speed of the conveyor system (Fig. 1C). As configured the unit contains two opposing IP55 Hg UVC lamp fixtures, but two more pairs can be added to achieve effective irradiation at higher belt speeds for increasing FFR treatment throughput.
For dose testing with SARS-CoV-2, one lamp was removed from the system (shown in Fig. 1B) and evaluated for germicidal activity in a biosafety-level 3 (BSL-3) facility at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS). UVC irradiance was measured using a calibrated Optometer P 9710 Gigahertz-Optik UVC meter (Türkenfeld, Germany) with the 254 nm detection head that was positioned at a fixed distance approximating the distance of the FFR from one of UVC lamps as configured in the UVC mask exposure system. The lamps were allowed to warm up for approximately 2 min to achieve stable UVC output. Due to potential masking effects that may occur in the space between the two bulbs, the changes due to positioning was assessed using 1 cm increments and experiments were done in position number 2 (Fig. 1D,E). To approximate the exposure of a contaminated FFR, tests with the single lamp system were made by exposing experimental respirator-based test coupons, first on one side, then the other, as described below.
Cells and viruses
Vero-E6 cells (ATCC CRL-1586™, clone E6) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; 1X with glucose and sodium pyruvate, Corning 10013CV) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) from PEAK (PS-FB03), penicillin–streptomycin (100X Corning 30-0002-CL), MEM non-essential amino-acids (100X Gibco; 25025CL) and Hepes buffer (1 M, Gibco; 15630-080) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were passaged every three days until required for experimentation. A549 human lung carcinoma cells (ATCC CCL-185) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone SH0066.03) and penicillin/streptomycin (100 × Corning 30-0002-CL) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Infectious virus assays using 3rd generation lentivirus expressing constitutive enhanced green fluorescent protein (LV-EGFP; Addgene plasmid # 36083) were performed in the biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) Stem Cell Core Facility at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (SCCFRPI). Viral stocks were produced using human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells, with collection and concentration of lentivirus 48 h after transfection of 3rd generation plasmid constructs. Infectious virus assays for this study using SARS-CoV-2 (USA-WA1/202, bei resource—NR52281) were handled within a BSL-3 containment facility at ISMMS by trained personnel upon approval of protocols by the institutional biosafety committee. Propagation of viral stocks were done in Vero-E6 cell confluent monolayers by using an infection medium composed of DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS, Non-essential amino acids (NEAA), Hepes and penicillin–streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 72 h. A cell culture adapted murine Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV; ATCC VR-12B, non-enveloped virus) was expanded and titrated in Vero-CCL81 cells with DMEM and 2% HI-FBS and penicillin–streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 48 h27. Viral genomes were sequenced for verification via Oxford nanopore platform.
Inactivation of N95 respirator test coupons spiked with lentivirus
Test coupons of the 3 M-N95 respirator containing all layers of the 3 M 8211-N95 particulate respirator were cut under sterile conditions resulting in final dimensions of 25 mm × 25 mm. N95 respirator test coupons were loaded with LV-EGFP by incubation in a 50 ml conical tube containing 30 ml Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with 2 × 108 transduction units (TU) of LV-EGFP. Virus was allowed to adsorb into the test coupons for 15 min. Coupons were placed in 10 cm petri dishes (2 dishes, each with 4 coupons). One dish with four coupons was placed, open, under the UVC Hg lamp with aluminum foil under the petri dish to reflect UVC radiation. The second dish was covered, wrapped in aluminum foil, and kept in the same biosafety cabinet without UVC exposure as a control for presence of infectious virus. The UVC Hg lamp was placed 15.2 cm (6 inches) above the coupon surface. Coupons were exposed to UVC radiation for 1 min (equivalent of 2 mJ cm−2), turned over with sterile forceps, and exposed to UVC radiation for 1 additional minute. After UVC treatment, coupons were transferred to 15 ml conical tubes and submerged in 5 ml of infection medium (DMEM + 1.5% HI-FBS). Control and UVC-treated infection media were used immediately for viral infectivity assays.
Efficiency of LV-EGFP inactivation was tested by serial tenfold dilutions of infection medium in the 15 ml conical tubes, followed by inoculation of 100% confluent A549 cell monolayers in duplicate. Cells were incubated for 48 h, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, treated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) nuclear stain for 10 min and imaged with a ThermoScientific Cellomics ArrayScan XTI high-content microscope to visualize infected cells as indicated by green fluorescent protein (GFP). Total cell number was determined by counting DAPI + objects and percent-infected determined by DAPI + nuclei associated with EGFP signal.
Inactivation of N95 respirator test coupons spiked with SARS-CoV-2 and EMCV
Test coupons of the 3 M-N95 respirator containing all layers of the 3 M 8211-N95 particulate respirator were cut under sterile conditions resulting in final dimensions of 25 mm × 25 mm. These were then loaded with SARS-CoV-2 by incubating them in 50 ml conical bottom tubes containing 30 ml of DMEM spiked with 1 × 106 plaque forming units (PFU) SARS-CoV-2. The virus was allowed to adsorb into the test coupons for 15 min at room temperature. Afterwards, the coupons were transferred to sterile tissue culture grade 10 cm petri-dishes. These were placed over aluminum foil and under the Hg UVC lamp after lamp warm-up. In parallel, a similar setup was conducted in which the spiked dishes were incubated in a biosafety cabinet without exposing to UVC radiation to confirm the presence of virus in the N95 test coupons. A working distance of 15.2 cm was maintained between the UVC Hg lamp and the top of the coupon surface within the petri dish. The UVC irradiance was measured at the working distance to be 5.43 mW cm−2 and was measured using the Optometer P 9710 Gigahertz Optik (Türenfeld, Germany) equipped with a cosine corrected 254 nm detector and the coupons were exposed for either 2, 6, 18, 54 120, 164 and 420 s per side and were flipped using sterile forceps. The coupons were then transferred to 15 ml conical bottom tubes and were submerged in 3 ml of infection medium and was vortexed for one minute and were left overnight at 4 °C and were assayed the following day. Inactivation assays for the non-enveloped EMCV virus was conducted using the above protocol using exact conditions in a BSL-2 setting.
Confluent monolayers of Vero-E6 cells in 12-well plate format were infected with tenfold serially diluted samples in 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS pH 7.0; Corning 21040CV) supplemented with bovine serum albumin (BSA; MP-Bio 810063) and penicillin–streptomycin for an hour while gently shaking the plates every 15 min. Afterwards, the inoculum was removed, and the cells were incubated with an overlay composed of MEM with 2% FBS and 0.05% purified agar (OXOID-UK; LP0028) for 72 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The plates were subsequently fixed using 4% formaldehyde overnight and the formaldehyde was removed along with the overlay. Fixed monolayers were blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% tween-20 (TBS-T) for an hour. Afterwards, plates were immunostained using a monoclonal antibody cocktail against SARS-CoV-2 Spike (Creative-Biolabs; 2BCE5) and SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein NP (Creative-Biolabs; NP1C7C7) at a dilution of 1:1000 followed by 1:5000 anti-mouse IgG monoclonal antibody and was developed using KPL TrueBlue peroxidase substrate for 10 min (Seracare; 5510-0030). After washing the plates with distilled water, the number of plaques were counted. Data shown here is derived from three independent experimental setups. EMCV samples were processed in VERO-CCL81 cells in 6 well format, incubated for 48 h, and developed with crystal-violet.
Inactivation of N95 respirator test coupons spiked with LV-EGFP
Supernatants derived from untreated respirator test coupons were used to infect A549 cells and a total of 36001 cells were analyzed. A total of 2.57% cells (approximately 925 cells) were GFP positive because of LV-EGFP infection and constituted around 1155 viral transduction units per ml of analyzed supernatant (Fig. 2A). Supernatants derived from test coupons treated for 60 s each side showed only around 0.08% GFP positive cells (approximately 27 cells out of a total of 33908) accounting for 34 viral transduction units per ml (Fig. 2B). A total of 1.53 Log10 reduction was observed.
Total inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 in spiked N95 apparatuses by 120 s of exposure per side
The warmed-up UVC device neutralized approximately 1 log viral titer with as little as 2 s of exposure per side (Fig. 3A). Further reduction of approximately 2 logs was observed by an exposure of 54 s and by 120 s (per side), total inactivation was apparent by the lack of plaque forming units (PFU) derived from the respective experimental settings (T = 120 s per side 3.6 Log10 reduction). This was achieved by using an irradiance of at least 5.43 mW cm−2. Figure 3 demonstrates exponential decay (r2 = 99; p < 0.001) in PFUs and fraction of active virus remaining as function of both exposure times and dose. While we observed a significant reduction by 54 s of exposure per-side, we were unable to replicate it in one of the three independent experiments.
Total inactivation of non-enveloped EMCV in spiked N95 apparatuses by 120 s of exposure per side
The inactivation kinetics for EMCV was much slower as a function of time (Fig. 4A). A dramatic reduction of PFU for EMCV was seen beyond 54 s of irradiation per side, using an irradiance of at least 5.43 mWcm-2 (0.59 J cm−2). Nevertheless, exponential decay was observed for EMCV (r2 = 91; p = 0.01) in PFUs as well as fraction of active virus remaining as function of dose and exposure time. Complete inactivation (A total of 2.82 Log10 reduction) was only observed by 120 s irradiation per side (Fig. 4B).
COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has negatively impacted the entire world, affecting all industries across multiple disciplines. All essential workers, particularly healthcare workers, extensively rely on FFRs such as N95 respirators to minimize the risk of contraction and transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, such respirators are in high use and demand, with resulting shortages suggesting the need for safe reuse28. Based on of SARS-CoV-2 virus survivorship data coupled with the need to preserve FFRs, the USA government recommended the use of one respirator per day, cycling them throughout the week ensuring a minimum of five days between reuse29. The risk associated with reuse would suggest further studies to explore the effective decontamination of facepieces. A recent study demonstrated the extensive persistence of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus in PPE, particularly in FFRs30. This has encouraged researchers to evaluate several potential methods for the decontamination of FFRs.
Among the methods of decontamination, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), primarily UVC 254 nm has a lengthy history of antimicrobial applications in healthcare and medical based settings31. Due to ease of scalability of UVC based decontamination methods, they are favorable for use during a pandemic. During the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic UVC air and surface borne decontamination can be deployed more generally, for example to decontaminate public spaces. Here, we evaluated a germicidal UVC 254 nm irradiation system as a potential tool to decontaminate respirators with the aim of assisting their safe reuse.
We first characterized the device by obtaining the dose response parameters as well as identifying the importance of the positioning of the respirators which are to be sterilized to obtain the most efficient decontamination setting (Fig. 1C,D,E). The prototype derivative we had was first used to test the germicidal potential, using a lipid enveloped 3rd generation lentivirus as a model virus under BSL-2 containment. The data suggested robust reduction of lentivirus that were infused within the N95 test coupons upon UVC 254 nm treatment for a total 120 s (Fig. 2; 1.53 Log10 reduction). By taking the above data into consideration, we then evaluated a time and dose dependent UVC irradiation protocol for the decontamination of N95 Respirator test coupons spiked with live SARS-CoV-2 under BSL-3 conditions. Of note, two seconds per side of irradiation (4 s total exposure time) indicated the reduction of approximately 1 log of viral titer with a minimal irradiance of 5.43 mW cm−2 (0.02 J cm−2). While we were able to see an approximate 2.5 log reduction of respirator test coupons treated for a total of 108 s (54 s per side) (0.6 J cm−2) in two out of three independent experiments, we were able to see the reduction of approximately 3.6 log viral reduction by 240 s (1.3 J cm−2) of total UVC 254 nm irradiation in all experimental replicates. An important note to highlight here is that we used a functional assay such as plaque assay to test the inactivation as opposed to utilizing a technique such as qPCR. Molecular techniques as such may not truly reflect the degree of inactivation given that the presence of nucleic acids such as RNA is not indicative of live virus.
Although we spiked the test coupons with 106 PFU of SARS-CoV-2, we were only able to retrieve an average viral titer of 4.3 × 103 PFU. This can be accounted for in that the spiked test coupons were suspended in a larger volume of 15 ml after spiking. Our study was able to demonstrate a 3.6 viral log reduction by 240 s of irradiation (1.3 J cm−2), yet it is currently unknown as to the number of virions that may be present in FFRs derived from real-life settings such as clinics and high biosafety level laboratories. To corroborate our data and to assess the potential of the inactivation device, we used the non-lipid enveloped RNA virus, EMCV in our study. Some investigators have shown non-enveloped viruses although susceptible to UVC damage, may require higher doses or exposure times32,33. While the inactivation kinetics were much slower in comparison to the enveloped SARS-CoV-2, total inactivation was observed by 120 s of irradiation per-side (1.3 J cm−2), demonstrating the ability of the device to decontaminate both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses. Previous studies have looked at UVC 254 nm treatment in viral species and reported data suggesting lentiviruses (Retroviridae) although lipid-enveloped, show unusually high level resistance for UV-C inactivation (D37 = 67–110 J m−2; D90 = 280 J m−2)23,34,35. Conversely, D90 and D37 values for SARS-CoV-2 (Coronaviridae) has been determined to be 23 J m−2 and 3 J m−2 indicating the increased susceptibility to UVC 254 nm in comparison to other viruses we have used and is consistent with previous studies23,30,32,34,35. Additionally, the D90 and D37 values for EMCV (Picornaviridae) has been determined as 55 J m−2 and 44–53 J m−2, suggesting a slight increase in resistance to UVC 254 nm in comparison to SARS-CoV-2 but not as much as the lentiviruses23,34,35. In summary, our data is consistent with previously reported data indicating susceptibilities for different viral species to UVC 254 nm inactivation and its potential application for PPE decontamination.
While there are promising data in the current study, several limitations warrant further investigation. In this study, instead of full N95 respirator, we directly exposed each side of the respirator test coupon to UVC 254 nm at a series of doses related to the respirator re-use device conveyor speed. This was for practical reasons, as the full respirator irradiation system could not be moved into the BSL-3 lab. Since all UV exposure is direct line-of-sight we anticipate the curvature would not impact the result in the full respirator irradiation system, as the respirators are irradiated simultaneously from both sides and from various angles as the masks move on the conveyor system in between the UVC 254 nm irradiation sources. Further the respirator material is not reflective, and a significant amount of the radiation will scatter into the respirator filter material; therefore, for these reasons we expect the test coupon irradiation to be representative of the actual respirator exposure on the conveyor system.
N95 manufacturers such as 3 M do not recommend the decontamination as well as the reuse of FFRs. This probably has been suggested based on a study conducted by 3 M in which respirators were exposed to cumulative dose of 10 J cm−2 between five to 10 cycles resulting in changes in Respirator fit and physical characteristics36. This is indicative of the fact that FFRs are only able to withstand a certain amount of decontamination cycles before the performance is compromised. Some studies have suggested that repetitive donning and removal FFRs result in impaired respirator fit37, indicating that such respirators can only be reused a very small amount of time regardless of the decontamination efficiency. While there are no strict guidelines explaining the possible number of reuses for FFRs, the CDC recommends no more than 5 reuses based on two studies37,38,39. Therefore, a non-deleterious germicidal protocol can be implemented for the decontamination of FFRs to support the safe reuse for a limited number of times. Other studies have demonstrated the effects on the materials and fit upon UVC irradiation using doses 1–1.2 J m−2. It was noted that there was no significant damage to the respirators, compromising the performance. However, some impact on fit due to strap degradation was noted after an unspecified number of cycles and was not quantitatively addressed16,19,22,26. Furthermore, a variety of N95 FFRs in the range considered here (1–1.2 J cm−2) were tested for performance post treatment and found no significant respiratory filter material damage, impact on filtration performance. The proposed device in the current study will be operating below these doses as lower end and near these dosages at the upper exposure ranges.
The current COVID-19 pandemic has presented a multitude of challenges in healthcare settings and the seemingly apparent shortage of the PPE such as FFRs is currently an issue as such. This study evaluated UVC based germicidal decontamination protocol which has the potential to inactivate 3.6 log SARS-CoV-2 within a total time frame of 240 s, facilitating a potential avenue for the safe reuse of the FFRs.
Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C. & Garry, R. F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26, 450–452 (2020).
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. COVID-19. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19-pandemic (2021).
Almond, D. & Mazumder, B. The 1918 influenza pandemic and subsequent health outcomes: An analysis of SIPP data. Am. Econ. Rev. 95, 258–262 (2005).
Rubio-Romero, J. C., del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira, M., García, J. A. T. & Calero-Castro, S. Disposable masks: Disinfection and sterilization for reuse, and non-certified manufacturing, in the face of shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Saf. Sci. 1, 104830 (2020).
Perkins, D. J. et al. COVID-19 global pandemic planning: Decontamination and reuse processes for N95 respirators. Exp. Biol. Med. 245, 933–939 (2020).
WHO. Shortage of personal protective equipment endangereing health workers worldwide. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/03-03-2020-shortage-of-personal-protective-equipment-endangering-health-workers-worldwide. (2020)
Bauchner, H., Fontanarosa, P. B. & Livingston, E. H. Conserving supply of personal protective equipment” a call for ideas. JAMA 323, 1911–1911 (2020).
Dong, J. H. X. Stability of SARS Coronavirus in Human Specimens and Environment and its Sensitivity to Heating and UV Irradiation (Springer, 2003).
Lai, M. Y., Cheng, P. K. & Lim, W. W. Survival of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41, e67–e71 (2005).
Van Doremalen, N. et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1564–1567 (2020).
Derraik, J. G., Anderson, W. A., Connelly, E. A. & Anderson, Y. C. Rapid evidence summary on SARS-CoV-2 survivorship and disinfection, and a reusable PPE protocol using a double-hit process. MedRxiv 133, 7 (2020).
Kampf, G., Todt, D., Pfaender, S. & Steinmann, E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J. Hosp. Infect. 104, 246–251 (2020).
Riddell, S., Goldie, S., Hill, A., Eagles, D. & Drew, T. W. The effect of temperature on persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on common surfaces. Virol. J. 17, 1–7 (2020).
Chin, A. W. & Poon, L. L. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions: Authors’ reply. Lancet Microbe 1, e146 (2020).
Pastorino, B., Touret, F., Gilles, M., de Lamballerie, X. & Charrel, R. N. Prolonged infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in fomites. Emerg. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2609.201788 (2020).
Viscusi, D., King, W. & Shaffer, R. Effect of decontamination on the filtration efficiency of two filtering facepiece respirator models. J. Int. Soc. Respir. Protect. 24, 93 (2007).
Kariwa, H., Fujii, N. & Takashima, I. Inactivation of SARS coronavirus by means of povidone-iodine, physical conditions and chemical reagents. Dermatology 212(Suppl 1), 119–123 (2006).
Rabenau, H. et al. Stability and inactivation of SARS coronavirus. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 194, 1–6 (2005).
Viscusi, D. J., Bergman, M. S., Eimer, B. C. & Shaffer, R. E. Evaluation of five decontamination methods for filtering facepiece respirators. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 53, 815–827 (2009).
Kowalski, W. Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation Handbook: UVGI for Air and Surface Disinfection (Springer, 2010).
Darnell, M. E., Subbarao, K., Feinstone, S. M. & Taylor, D. R. Inactivation of the coronavirus that induces severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS-CoV. J. Virol. Methods 121, 85–91 (2004).
Lindblad, M., Tano, E., Lindahl, C. & Huss, F. Ultraviolet-C decontamination of a hospital room: Amount of UV light needed. Burns 1, 1–10 (2019).
Lytle, C. D. & Sagripanti, J. L. Predicted inactivation of viruses of relevance to biodefense by solar radiation. J. Virol. 79, 14244–14252 (2005).
Lore, M. B., Heimbuch, B. K., Brown, T. L., Wander, J. D. & Hinrichs, S. H. Effectiveness of three decontamination treatments against influenza virus applied to filtering facepiece respirators. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56, 92–101 (2012).
Heimbuch, B. K. et al. A pandemic influenza preparedness study: Use of energetic methods to decontaminate filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with H1N1 aerosols and droplets. Am. J. Infect. Control 39, e1–e9 (2011).
Lindsley, W. G. et al. Effects of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) on N95 respirator filtration performance and structural integrity. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12, 509–517 (2015).
Carocci, M. & Bakkali-Kassimi, L. The encephalomyocarditis virus. Virulence 3, 351–367 (2012).
CDC. Strategies for optimizing the supply of N95 Respirators. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/respirators-strategy/index.html (2021).
O’Hearn Katie, S. G. et al. Decontaminating N95 and SN95 masks with ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) does not impair mask efficacy and safety: A systematic review. J. Hosp. Infect. 106(1), 163–175 (2020).
Kasloff, S. B., Leung, A., Strong, J. E., Funk, D. & Cutts, T. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on critical personal protective equipment. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–7 (2021).
Reed, N. G. The history of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation for air disinfection. Public Health Rep. 125, 15–27 (2010).
Blázquez, E. et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the SurePure Turbulator ultraviolet-C irradiation equipment on inactivation of different enveloped and non-enveloped viruses inoculated in commercially collected liquid animal plasma. PLoS ONE 14, e0212332 (2019).
Tanaka, T., Nogariya, O., Shionoiri, N., Maeda, Y. & Arakaki, A. Integrated molecular analysis of the inactivation of a non-enveloped virus, feline calicivirus, by UV-C radiation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 126, 63–68 (2018).
Meunier, S. M., Sasges, M. R. & Aucoin, M. G. Evaluating ultraviolet sensitivity of adventitious agents in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 44, 893–909 (2017).
Kowalski, W. J., Bahnfleth, W. & Hernandez, M. T. A genomic model for predicting the ultraviolet susceptibility of viruses. IUVA News 11, 15–28 (2009).
M Science. Decontamination of 3M filtering facepiece respirators such as N95 respirators in the United States: Considerations. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1824869O/decontamination-methods-for-3m-filtering-facepiece-respirators-technical-bulletin.pdf (2021).
Vuma, C. D., Manganyi, J., Wilson, K. & Rees, D. The effect on fit of multiple consecutive donning and doffing of N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Ann. Work Exposures Health 63, 930–936 (2019).
DC-Pandemic planning. Recommended guidance for Extended use and limited reuse of N95 filtering facepiece respirators in healthcare settings. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hcwcontrols/recommendedguidanceextuse.html (2021).
Bergman, M. S. et al. Impact of multiple consecutive donnings on filtering facepiece respirator fit. Am. J. Infect. Control 40, 375–380 (2012).
We thank Randy Albrecht for support with the BSL-3 facility and procedures at the ISMMS, and Richard Cadagan for technical assistance. This research was partly funded by CRIP (Center for Research for Influenza Pathogenesis), a NIAID supported Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS, Contract # HHSN272201400008C); and by CRIPT (Center for Research for Influenza Pathogenesis and Transmission), a NIAID supported Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response (CEIRR, contract # 75N93019R00028); by the generous support of the JPB Foundation, the Open Philanthropy Project [research grant 2020-215611 (5384)], anonymous donors to AG-S, funds from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and NIH CTSA grant funding (5UL1TR001433).
A patent application has been submitted by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute on the use of UVC sterilization devices for viral inactivation. None of the authors have a financial interest in the commercialization of the UVC system described in this paper. The García-Sastre Laboratory has received research support from Pfizer, Senhwa Biosciences, 7Hills Pharma, Pharmamar, Blade Therapeutics, Avimex, Accurius, Dynavax, Kenall Manufacturing, ImmunityBio and Nanocomposix; and A.G.-S. has consulting agreements for the following companies involving cash and/or stock: Vivaldi Biosciences, Pagoda, Contrafect, Vaxalto, Accurius, 7Hills Pharma, Avimex, Esperovax and Farmak. There is no other financial or non-financial conflict of interest by the rest of the authors apart from currently declared.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rathnasinghe, R., Karlicek, R.F., Schotsaert, M. et al. Scalable, effective, and rapid decontamination of SARS-CoV-2 contaminated N95 respirators using germicidal ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation device. Sci Rep 11, 19970 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99431-5