Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Features of structure, magnetic state and electrodynamic performance of SrFe12−xInxO19

Abstract

Indium-substituted strontium hexaferrites were prepared by the conventional solid-phase reaction method. Neutron diffraction patterns were obtained at room temperature and analyzed using the Rietveld methods. A linear dependence of the unit cell parameters is found. In3+ cations are located mainly in octahedral positions of 4fVI and 12 k. The average crystallite size varies within 0.84–0.65 μm. With increasing substitution, the TC Curie temperature decreases monotonically down to ~ 520 K. ZFC and FC measurements showed a frustrated state. Upon substitution, the average and maximum sizes of ferrimagnetic clusters change in the opposite direction. The Mr remanent magnetization decreases down to ~ 20.2 emu/g at room temperature. The Ms spontaneous magnetization and the keff effective magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant are determined. With increasing substitution, the maximum of the ε/ real part of permittivity decreases in magnitude from ~ 3.3 to ~ 1.9 and shifts towards low frequencies from ~ 45.5 GHz to ~ 37.4 GHz. The maximum of the tg(α) dielectric loss tangent decreases from ~ 1.0 to ~ 0.7 and shifts towards low frequencies from ~ 40.6 GHz to ~ 37.3 GHz. The low-frequency maximum of the μ/ real part of permeability decreases from ~ 1.8 to ~ 0.9 and slightly shifts towards high frequencies up to ~ 34.7 GHz. The maximum of the tg(δ) magnetic loss tangent decreases from ~ 0.7 to ~ 0.5 and shifts slightly towards low frequencies from ~ 40.5 GHz to ~ 37.7 GHz. The discussion of microwave properties is based on the saturation magnetization, natural ferromagnetic resonance and dielectric polarization types.

Introduction

As a rule, the novel functional materials are very often created on the platform of complex oxides1,2,3. The main advantage of oxides is their chemical stability during operation of the material in an air atmosphere4. The development of new information technologies and wireless data transmission systems5 is based on materials with high microwave characteristics. Such materials are mainly composites of complex oxides of transition metals6. Since the microwave properties of a material are determined not only by the dielectric contribution, but also by the magnetic one, the use of magnetodielectrics is the most suitable solution to the problem7. Ferrites are the most typical representatives of complex transition metal oxides with optimal magnetodielectric properties8.

Ferrites of various types exist9. The most promising of them have spinel10 and magnetoplumbite structures11. Most often, ferrites are used to convert the energy of electromagnetic radiation12. The use of ferrites in microelectronic devices is explained by the high values of the Curie point and the spontaneous magnetic moment13. For hexaferrites with the M-type magnetoplumbite structure, high values of dielectric and magnetic permeability in the microwave region are especially distinguished14. One of the representatives of hard magnetic materials with a ferrimagnetic structure is M-type strontium hexaferrite SrFe12O1915. Due to the low cost of production, it is most often used as permanent magnets, microwave devices, and wireless communication components16.

The crystal structure of the M type SrFe12O19 hexaferrite, which is hexagonal with space group P63/mmc (No 194), is designed from the 4 building blocks, namely S, S*, R, and R*. The asterisk indicates mirror symmetry about the (xy0) plane. The O2− anions are closed packed with the Sr2+ and Fe3+ cations in the interstitial positons. There are 10 layers of the O2− anions along the c axis and the Fe3+ catons are placed at 5 crystallographically nonequivalent positions: 2a, 4fVI and 12 k octahedral ones, 4fIV tetrahedral ones and 2b pentahedral (trigonal–bipyramidal) ones. The Fe3+ cations contribute to the magnetic moment in the next way: the 12 k, 2a, and 2b positions have spin up and 4fIV and 4fVI positions have spin down direction. The S = Fe6O8 and S* blocks are spinels with 2 O2− layers and 6 Fe3+ cations. The 4 from these Fe3+ cations are placed in the octahedral positions with parallel spins. The other 2 Fe3+ cations are in tetrahedral positions with antiparallel spins to the octahedral positions. The hexagonal R = SrFe6O11 and R* blocks, consist of 3 O2− anions layers with one of the O2− anion replaced with an Sr2+ cation. The 6 Fe3+ cations are placed in each R block. The 5 Fe3+ cations are placed in octahedral positions. The 3 of them have spin up and 3 have spin down direction. The 1 Fe3+ cation is coordinated with the 5 O2− anions and has spin up direction. The Fe3+ cations at the 2a positions are octahedrally coordinated with equal Fe–O lengths. The other octahedrally coordinated Fe3+ cations at 4fVI and 12 k sites have different Fe–O lengths, from ~ 1.8 Å up to ~ 2.4 Å. The 12 Fe3+ cations of the formula unit, the Fe3+ cations at 4fIV positions are tetrahedrally coordinated by the O2− anions, while the Fe3+ cations at 2b positions are coordinated by the 5 O2− anions. There are also short Fe–Fe lengths in the structure, and at 4fVI positions these Fe–Fe lengths are ~ 2.7 Å. Such a complex unit cell is characterized by significant crystalline anisotropy, which is reflected in the ratio of lattice parameters c/a 3.96. So, each from the Fe3+ cations contributes 5 μB in the ground state, the total moment is (1*(2a) + 1*(2b) -2*(4fV) − 2*(4fVI) + 6*(12 k))*5 μB = 20 μB per formula unit11,14.

For the SrFe12O19 the saturation magnetic induction increased from ~ 291 G to ~ 300 G and the coercivity decreased from ~ 2.8 kOe to ~ 1.8 kOe by increasing the sintering temperature. The microwave absorption before sintering was below ~ 3 dB, but it reached ~ 6 dB at ~ 11.1 GHz after sintering. The reflection loss spectra increased by sintering due to the reduction of porosity and damping factor17. The magnetic permeability and magnetic loss measurements in the range 100 MHz to 1.5 GHz, reveals that 1.32 ≤ μ′ ≤ 1.68 for the permeability of BaFe12O19 and 1.16 < μ′ ≤ 1.88 for SrFe12O19. The BaFe12O19 presented lower loss ~ 4.10−3 at 1.5 GHz. The permittivity of BaFe12O19 and SrFe12O19 at 1.5 GHz are, respectively ~ 8.18 and ~ 8.19, and at 1 MHz are, respectively ~ 52.04 and ~ 19.09. The samples presented coercive field in the range of 3–5 kOe and remanence magnetization in the range of 33–36 emu/g18.

The substitution is also one of the ways to control the microwave properties of complex oxides. With increasing substitution for the SrFe12−xTix/2Znx/2O19, the coercivity decreased from ~ 5640 Oe to ~ 1486 Oe while the maximum saturation magnetization was ~ 63 emu/g for the x = 0.5. It was established the excellent microwave absorption and the maximum loss was ~ 36.58 dB for the sample with x = 2.519. One of the most interesting types of substitution is a diamagnetic homovalent substitution with the In3+ indium cations at which the charge state of the Fe3+ iron cations remains constant. The room temperature Mössbauer spectra confirmed that the In3+ cations preferentially occupy the 4fVI octahedral positions in SrFe12O19 hexaferrite20. However, it was indications that the substitutes also enter the 2b trigonal–bipyramidal positions. The change in hyperfine magnetic field at the 12 k positions indicates the complex and competing behavior of the Fe3+–O2−–Fe3+ indirect superexchange interactions. The splitting of the 12 k magnetic hyperfine spectrum is not due simply to random disruptions of the indirect superexchange interactions.

Effects of nonmagnetic indium ion substitution on magnetic properties of M-type strontium hexaferrites SrFe12−xInxO19 (x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1) have been earlier studied by crystallographic and magnetic measurements21. Samples were prepared by citric auto-combustion method. It was shown that the samples were single phase with the P63/mmc (No 194) space group and lattice constants linearly increased with substitution. It was established that In3+ cations mainly placed in 4fVI positions. It was also shown that while the coercive force and the magnetic anisotropy constant decreased through the whole doping range, the saturation magnetization first increased until x = 0.5 and decreased thereafter21. Based on the calculation by the first-principles density functional theory of the substitution energy of In3+ cations in SrFe12O19 and the formation probability analysis, it was concluded that the substituted In3+ cations in SrFe12−xInxO19 occupy the 12 k, 4fVI, and 4fIV positions. The positions occupation probabilities were used to calculate the magnetic properties of the substituted samples. It was found that in the case of SrFe12−xInxO19, saturation magnetization, magnetic anisotropy energy, and anisotropy field decrease with an increase of the substitution concentration22. To explain the appearance of the spontaneous polarization in the M-type hexaferrites the determination of the crystal structure features was realized in the centrosymmetric (No 194) and non-centrosymmetric (No 186) space groups23,24.

In our case the structure and microwave characteristics of the In3+ cations substituted strontium hexaferrites were thoroughly investigated. The powder neutron diffraction that allows collecting the crystal structure and magnetic ordering information was applied. The using of a wide range of experimental methods for studying the microwave performance of the obtained samples under different conditions allows to analyze the relationship between their charge and spin subsystems.

Experimental procedure

All the ceramic SrFe12−xInxO19 (SFI-x) (x = 0.1; 0.3; 0.6 and 1.2) samples were obtained according to the method described in detail in the work24.

The homogeneity and chemical content of all the samples were checked by X-ray diffraction method on the diffractometer Empyrean (Panalytical, Malvern, United Kingdom) in Cu-radiation. Neutron diffraction studies of the ceramic samples were carried out at room temperature on G 4–1 and G 4–4 diffractometers with wavelength ~ 2.426 Å and ~ 1.9593 Å, respectively, in the experimental hall of the nuclear center in Laboratoire Leon Brillouin (LLB) (Saclay, France). The resolution functions for both G 4–1 and G 4–4 diffractometers were determined during separate experiments with NAC standard. The Rietveld analysis25 of neutron diffraction patterns as previously performed for similar chemical compounds26 was carried out by FullProf software package27.

The morphology of microstructure of ceramic samples were studied using a scanning electron microscope JSM-6490 LV (JEOL, USA). The microscope resolution reaches 3 nm with an accelerating voltage of the electron beam of 30 kV, the local areas of the sample increased up to × 20,000, the beam current was 200 nA.

The Curie temperature of samples was determined using the temperature dependence up to 800 K of their specific magnetization in field of 1 T26. The specific magnetization was measured on a MPMS XL SQUID (Quantum Design North America, USA) interferometer in the temperature range from 5 to 400 K24. The temperature dependences of the magnetization were measured in zero field cooled (ZFC) and field cooled (FC) modes in field of 50 Oe28. All the magnetic data were collected at warming.

The permittivity and permeability of the indium doped strontium hexaferrites bulk samples were extracted using the Nicholson-Ross-Weir algorithm from the S-parameters fixed as a frequency spectrum29. The measurements were realized in the frequency range of 32–50 GHz using the R&S ZVA 50 vector network analyzer (Rohde & Schwarz, Germany). When measuring S-parameters of the waveguide transmission line with the test material as a dielectric, a two-port TRL calibration was used.

The measuring line was used to determine the S-parameters. The samples for these experiments were prepared as powders. The waveguide WR-22 with dimensions 5.69 × 2.845 mm was used as a measuring line. The locking plates with electromagnetic parameters ε1.1 and μ1 were used to fix the investigated sample in the measuring line. The compensation of the influence of the locking plates on the measured parameters was carried out by calibrating the device.

Result and discussion

Crystal structure

To describe the features of crystal structure of the indium doped SFI-x strontium hexaferrites and their correlation with electromagnetic properties the powder neutron diffraction patterns at room temperature were collected, which are shown in Fig. 1. The numerical results of the refinement are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1
figure1

NPD pattern with Rietveld fitting lines at room temperature for the SFI-0.1 sample measured on diffractometer G 4–4.

Table 1 Refined unit cell parameters, atomic positions and reliability factors for the SrFe12−xInxO19 (x = 0.1–1.2) samples obtained by the Rietveld method in framework of the P63/mmc (No. 194) space group at room temperature. Fixed atomic positions for this case are: Sr (2d) (2/3, 1/3, 1/4), Fe1 (2a) (0, 0, 0); Fe2 (2b) (0, 0, 1/4); (Fe/In)3 (4fIV) (1/3, 2/3, z); (Fe/In)4 (4fV I) (1/3, 2/3, z); (Fe/In)5 (12 k) (x, 2x, z); O1 (4e) (0, 0, z); O2 (4f.) (1/3, 2/3, z); O3 (6 h) (x, 2x, 1/4); O4 (12 k) (x, 2x, z); O5 (12 k) (x, 2x, z).

Figure 1 shows the experimental data in the form of individual intensity of the Bragg’s positions. This plot also shows the results of fitting in the form of continuous lines, one of which describes a continuous diffraction spectrum, and the second line gives an idea of the calculation error. The fitting was based on the Bragg’s positions shown in this plot, both crystal and magnetic contributions to the structure. So, the presented data fully reflects the necessary and sufficient set for the fitting and its results.

The classical values of unit cell parameters ionic coordinates and reliability factors were obtained30. As it was well seen the a parameter linearly increases with x from ~ 5.8786(2) Å for the x = 0.1 up to ~ 5.9159(3) Å for the x = 1.2. Such behavior of the parameters satisfies the Vegard’s low31. It is determined by the ionic radii of r(Fe3+) = 0.645 Å and r(In3+) = 0.800 Å32. The unit cell V volume continuously rises from ~ 689.64(2) Å3 for the x = 0.1 up to ~ 703.77(5) Å3 for the x = 1.2. It is established that the In3+ cations occupy mainly the octahedral 4fVI and 12 k and tetrahedral 4fIV positions. The χ2 satisfactory factor of fitting did not exceed ~ 2.38. At the structure fitting the results of33 were also taken into account.

The conclusion about the distribution of the substitutional In3+ cations over the sublattices was made based on the results of the refinement of the crystal structure by the Rietveld method. The result of fitting with the most optimal values of the reliability factors was used. When forming the model, data were used previously obtained by several groups of researchers34,35,36. The results obtained on the distribution of substituent indium cations are in satisfactory agreement with recent works37,38,39, which indicates the reliability of the model used.

Microstructure

The surface form and numerical calculation results for the SFI-0.1 sample are demonstrated in Fig. 2a-c. As can be easy to see from SEM image, the sample has some porosity of 15%. This fact is explained by the insufficient annealing duration and weak preliminary compaction. The particles form is best described by the volumetric polyhedra. The size distribution histogram with the (n) particles number and their average particles size are also presented in Fig. 2b. The average particles size for all the samples is in the range 837–650 nm. It is interesting to note the formation of large crystallites from different particles with sizes exceeding ~ 1 µm for all the samples. The number of particles taken for size analysis was around 1500 for each sample.

Figure 2
figure2

Surface morphology for the SFI-0.1 sample (a), the distribution histograms vs. particle diameter (b) and the approximation of the average probability density by the three-modal function of the lognormal distribution (c).

The three- and bimodal functions were applied to describe the average particles size results and to receive the probability density function. For the SFI-0.1 sample the approximation of the average probability density by three-modal function of the lognormal distribution shows a good coincidence (see also Fig. 2c). The average particle sizes for each fraction of polydisperse samples were determined by the method of deconvolution of the lognormal function.

Magnetic properties

The temperature dependence of the specific magnetization in field of 1 T for the SFI-x solid solutions is shown in Fig. 3. Starting from low temperatures the signal continuously decreases. This fact is explained by acting of ever-increasing thermal energy. The latter disorders local spins and magnetization falls. The TC Curie temperature of the compounds monotonically decreases from ~ 730 K down to ~ 520 K with increasing the x (see insert in Fig. 3). Such behavior is a result of frustration of the magnetic ordering because of breakdown of long-range Fe3+ –O2−–Fe3+ indirect superexchange interactions by diamagnetic substitution that is consistent with analogous data earlier obtained for the indium doped barium hexaferrites40.

Figure 3
figure3

Graphs of magnetization (left axis) and magnetization derivative (right axis) vs. temperature in 1 T for the samples SFI-0.1 (a), SFI-0.3 (b), SFI-0.6 (c) and SFI-1.2 (d).

The temperature dependence of the magnetization for the investigated compounds was also collected in ZFC and FCW modes. They are shown in Fig. 4. It is well seen that the ZFC and FC curves are strong different below some temperature and the ZFC curve has local maximum. With increase the x the temperature of local maximum decreases from ~ 65 K down to ~ 13 K while the temperature of divergence of ZFC and FC curves increases from ~ 327 K up to ~ 362 K.

Figure 4
figure4

Graph of ZFC (black line) and FC (grey line) magnetization vs. temperature in a field of 50 Oe for the samples SFI-0.1 (a), SFI-0.3 (b), SFI-0.6 (c) and SFI-1.2 (d).

The divergence between ZFC and FC curves are observed for all the compositions above the room temperature. It is should be note that similar divergence between ZFC and FC curves was previously observed for different compounds and magnetic fine particles41,42,43,44. The existence of the ZFC and FC curves divergence below a certain Tdiv temperature is a characteristic of a frustrated magnetic system45. Decreasing the temperature without external magnetic field leads to freezing of local moments at a certain Tf freezing temperature. The preferred orientation is absent and all the moments are randomly frozen relative to each other. As a result of increasing the magnetic anisotropy a decrease in the magnetization of the sample is observed46.

At the cooling of the sample in the magnetic field the moment direction is determined by the competition between the energy of magnetic crystallographic anisotropy and Zeeman energy41. In large fields the moments in all crystallites are ordered parallel with the field and the magnetic texture ensures the presence of residual magnetization at low temperatures47. The Tf freezing temperature below which the energy of thermal fluctuations is significantly lower than the energy of magnetic anisotropy, can be found from the Bean-Livingston equation48.

Such distinction of the ZFC and FC curves for all the samples may be explained by the high stiffness and anisotropy of the Fe3+–O2−–Fe3+ exchange interactions49. As it well known the Tf freezing temperature determines the average size of a magnetically ordered inclusion, which can be a magnetically ordered cluster, in a magnetically disordered matrix or just a fine particle in powder. The Tdiv divergence temperature determines the maximum size of the magnetically ordered inclusion.

The concentration behavior of the critical Tf, Tdiv and TC temperatures is presented in Fig. 5 and may be explained by a change in the average and maximum sizes of magnetically ordered inclusion. The average size monotonically decreases with a diminishing rate of -47.3 K/x. That means that the substitution leads to the fragmentation of magnetically ordered inclusions. The maximum size monotonically increases with a diminishing rate of 31.9 K/x. That means that the substitution leads to the overgrowth of large magnetically ordered inclusions50.

Figure 5
figure5

Graph of the Tf freezing (a) and Tdiv divergence (b) and TC Curie (c) temperature vs. x for the SFI-x samples.

The field dependences of the magnetization for the investigated SFI-x samples measured at temperatures 300 K are shown in Fig. 6. The values of the Mr residual magnetization measured after switching off the external magnetic field, and the squareness ratio of the hysteresis loop SQR = Mr/Ms as well as the values of the Hc coercive field are shown in Table 2.

Figure 6
figure6

Graph of magnetization vs. field for the SFI-x samples with x = 0.1 (full circles), 0.3 (open circles), 0.6 (full rectangles) and 1.2 (open rectangles) at 300 K.

Table 2 The Mr residual magnetization, Ms saturation magnetization, SQR squareness ratio, keff effective constant of magnetocrystalline anisotropy, Ha anisotropy field and Hc coercive field at room temperature.

With increasing the x the Ms saturation magnetization, Mr residual magnetization and Hc coercivity decrease. This is explained by the diamagnetic dilution of magnetic sublattice and increasing the non-collinearity angle51. The diamagnetic In3+ indium cations have a similar effect, the increase their amount breaks the Fe3+ –O2−–Fe3+ indirect superexchange interactions of neighboring Fe3+ iron cations and conducts to violation of the spin collinearity of the Fe3+ cations. As a result, the value of the Mr residual magnetization decreases from ~ 55.6 emu/g down to ~ 20.2 emu/g at room temperature as x is increased from 0.1 up to 1.2.

Figure 6 shows the behavior of the Hc coercive force of the SFI-x samples. It is well seen that for the SFI-x composition with x = 0.1 has value of the Hc coercive force of 4100 Oe whereas the x = 1.2 has the Hc of ~ 2520 Oe.

The Law of Approach of Saturation has been used to estimate the keff effective magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant of In3+ substituted strontium hexaferrite52,53,54:

$$M\left(H\right)={M}_{S}\left(1-\frac{B}{{H}^{2}}\right)+{\chi }_{d}H$$
(1)

where Ms, B and χd are refined parameters: Ms is the saturation magnetization, χd is the susceptibility of the para-process. The rotation of magnetization by a strong magnetic field is associated with the term of B/H2, while the terms with H−n (where n > 2) are usually neglected. In accordance with the Stoner–Wohlfarth theory55, the homogeneous magnetization of the sample is achieved by the strong interatomic exchange interaction, which exceeds the anisotropy energy. Therefore, the magnetization reversal process of a crystallite was carried out due to the rotation of the magnetization vector as well as by changing the anisotropy energy and Zeeman energy in an external magnetic field, while the exchange energy does not change56. In this case, the anisotropy field of the material increases with increasing the magnetic anisotropy constant and decreases with increasing saturation magnetization according to the equation57:

$${H}_{a}(T)=\frac{2{K}_{1}(T)}{{M}_{S}(T)}$$
(2)

where Ms is the saturation magnetization; K1 is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant. Therefore, the temperature dependences of the coercivity should be determined by competition between the constant of magnetic anisotropy and saturation magnetization. In this case, a decrease in Ha with decreasing temperature can be explained by the fact that the saturation magnetization increases faster than the effective constant of magnetic anisotropy. The presence of maximum on the ZFC curve for the investigated samples (see Fig. 4) is the result of the sum of narrow maxima for particles with certain sizes that indicates the presence of size distribution of particles. Therefore, the broadening of maximum is determined by the contribution of the volume fractions of particles with a certain size. Using the Tf freezing or Tdiv divergence temperatures it is possible to calculate the average or maximum size of magnetic clusters. In this case, the volume of magnetic regions make up (1.7–6.3) × 104 Å3 in the case of the freezing Tf temperature and (3.4–8.0) × 105 Å3 for the divergence Tdiv temperature, respectively. As a result, the linear size of the magnetic inclusions can achieve up to 32–49 Å and 87–115 Å, respectively.

Microwave properties

Figure 7 shows the frequency dependence of the real part ε/ of permittivity and tg(α) dielectric loss tangent for the investigated samples at room temperature. These curves are characterized by local maximum in frequency range of 35–48 GHz. The resonance frequency constantly decreases with increasing the x. The amplitude of the resonance peak of the ε/ firstly increases up to ~ 3.3 at ~ 45.5 GHz for the x = 0.1 and then constantly decreases down to x = 1.2. The smallest value of ε/ local maximum is ~ 1.9 at 37.3 GHz for the x = 1.2. The dipole polarization, which determines the value of the real part ε/ of the permittivity, is associated with the orientation of the dipoles in the external electric field and is due to losses in overcoming the bond strengths.

Figure 7
figure7

Graph of the ε/ real part of permittivity (black line) and tg(α) loss tangent (grey line) vs. frequency at room temperature for the SFI-x samples with x = 0.1 (a), 0.3 (b), 0.6 (c) and 1.2 (d).

It is well known that the complex \(\dot{\varepsilon }\) permittivity and \(\dot{\mu }\) permeability can be found using the S-parameters by the Nicolson–Ross–Weir method58 as:

$$\dot{\varepsilon } = iclg\left( {\frac{7}{3}} \right)\left( {1 - \mathop {S_{{11}} }\limits^{.} } \right){\text{ln}}\left( {\mathop {S_{{21}} }\limits^{.} } \right)/\upomega{\text{l}}Z_{B} \left( {1 + \mathop {S_{{11}} }\limits^{.} } \right)$$
(3)

and

$${\dot{\upmu }} = icZ_{B} \left( {1 + \mathop {S_{{11}} }\limits^{.} } \right){\text{ln}}\left( {\mathop {S_{{21}} }\limits^{.} } \right)/60\upomega{\text{l}}lg\left( {\frac{7}{3}} \right)\left( {1 - \mathop {S_{{11}} }\limits^{.} } \right)$$
(4)

where \({\mathop {S_{{11}} }\limits^{.} }\) is the reflection coefficient; \({\mathop {S_{{21}} }\limits^{.} }\) is the transmission coefficient; c is the speed of light; l—the length of the investigated sample; ZB—the transmission line wave resistance; ω—the cyclic frequency.

It is well seen that the tg(α) curves also have local maximum in investigated frequency range. The resonant frequency of the tg(α) firstly decreases down to ~ 38.4 GHz with increasing the x up to 0.6 and then increases above 45 GHz. The amplitude of the tg(α) resonant peak firstly increases up to ~ 1.0 at ~ 40.6 GHz as the x achieves the 0.1. Then it decreases down to ~ 0.7 at ~ 37.3 GHz with increasing the x up to 0.6. And finally it increases up to ~ 1.0 at ~ 46.7 GHz for the x > 1.2.

The main types of losses of incident electromagnetic radiation are due to the peculiarities of the microstructure and shape of the material, electromagnetic parameters, as well as impedance matching. Microwave absorption is determined by the contribution of dielectric and magnetic losses. Dielectric losses are due to conduction losses, i.e. eddy currents, and losses of dipole and interface polarization, while magnetic losses depend on the resonance of domain walls and natural ferromagnetic resonance. The ε/ real part of permittivity determines the loss of conductivity, and its ε// imaginary part determines the loss of the dipole and interface polarization. The μ/ real part of permeability determines the loss of susceptibility of the spin subsystem to an external alternating magnetic field of electromagnetic radiation, and its μ// imaginary part determines the losses from resonance of domain walls and natural ferromagnetic resonance.

So, the dielectric loss is determined by the ε// imaginary part of permittivity, at lower frequencies, when dipole polarization prevails, this loss is very large, since the value of ε// in the sample is comparable in magnitude with ε/. With increasing frequency, the dipole polarization goes over to the ion-relaxation polarization. With this transition, the loss decreases, which is expressed in a decrease in the absolute value of tg(α) (Fig. 7).

A decrease in the value of the ε/ real part of permittivity in the sample in the frequencies below 36 GHz is also due to the transition from dipole polarization to ion-relaxation polarization. This transition from one type of polarization to another is clearly visible because the maximum of the real part ε/ of the permittivity shifts to the low-frequency region, while the value of the maximum itself decreases.

Since the loss in all substances decreases at the transition from orientation polarization to ion-relaxation one, the value of the ε// imaginary part of permittivity generally decrease in all samples above some critical frequency value (Fig. 7). When an electromagnetic wave acts on a substance, an ion with a larger mass is less displaced from its equilibrium position in the crystal lattice, and therefore dielectric losses decrease. Therefore, with increasing the indium substitution of strontium hexaferrites the loss value decreases, in our case. This indirectly confirms the above conclusion about the observed transition from orientation to ion-relaxation polarization. With increasing frequency, the orientation of the dipoles does not have time to change in accordance with the frequency of the applied field. As a result, the dipole polarization transforms into ion-relaxation polarization. Ion-relaxation polarization is caused by the displacement of ions at the sites of the crystal lattice, or located between sites59.

Figure 8 demonstrates the frequency spectra of the μ/ real part of permeability and tg(δ) magnetic loss tangent for the investigated samples. The permeability has some features in the same frequency range as the permittivity. As a tendency, the value of the real part μ/ of the permeability decreases with increasing frequency. However, for some samples such as x = 0, 0.3 and 1.2, a local maximum is observed, while for other samples only a tendency towards a maximum. For samples with x = 0.0 and 0.1, the local maximum of μ/ shifts to the frequency range well above 50 GHz. Value of local maximum of ~ 1.5 at ~ 36.2 GHz is observed for the sample with x = 0. For other samples the low-frequency maximum shifts well below 35 GHz. However high-frequency maximum is fixed at ~ 46.7 GHz and ~ 45.5 GHZ in magnitude equal to ~ 0.9 and 1.1 for the samples with x = 0.3 and 1.2, respectively.

Figure 8
figure8

Graph of the μ/ real part of permeability (black line) and tg(δ) loss tangent (grey line) vs. frequency at room temperature for the SFI-x samples with x = 0.1 (a), 0.3 (b), 0.6 (c) and 1.2 (d).

The value of the tg(δ) magnetic loss tangent decreases as a tendency with increasing frequency. The maximum of the tg(δ) is indicated for all the samples in range of 35–40 GHz. The high-frequency maximum is absent. The minimum of the tg(δ) is visible in vicinity of 45 GHz.

In a sample, each ion has a magnetic moment due to the geometry of unpaired electron clouds. Some ions have a compensated magnetic moment, i.e. they are diamagnetic. In a magnetic field inside each ion, weak induction currents of electron clouds are generated according to Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction. They cause a periodic change in the orientation of the magnetic moment on average along the field. This is the so-called precession of the moment. According to Lenz’s law, the magnetic flux generated by induction currents is opposite to the external magnetic field. All the investigated samples behave like ferromagnets, for such materials μ ≥ 160. The change in the magnetic permeability with frequency can be explained using Larmor’s theorem61. At rest, the samples have their own magnetic moment, which has a finite value, and has a significant impact on the overall value of the permeability. When the sample is placed in an external alternating magnetic field, according to Larmor’s theorem, the precession of the magnetic moment of the electrons begins. The energy spent on moment precession increases significantly at resonance and represents magnetic losses, i.e. the imaginary part μ// of the permeability. Diamagnetic In3+ indium cations have zero moment and their contribution in magnetic resonance and the imaginary part μ// of the permeability will decrease with increasing substitution62.

With an increase in in frequency and the substitution concentration by the In3+ indium cations, which have a large number of electrons, the intensity of the precession of the magnetic moment of electrons increases63,64,65 and, as a consequence, an increase in the real part μ/ of the permeability is observed. Due to the small induced magnetic moment of the In3+ indium cation itself, with an increase in its concentration66,67,68, this insignificantly affects the total value of μ/. An increase in the absolute value of the imaginary part μ// of the permeability (Fig. 8) with an increase in the substitution concentration69 can be explained by an increase in the precession frequency of the magnetic moments and an increase in the energy expended to maintain the precession, i.e. magnetic losses.

Conclusions

The SFI-x (x = 0.1; 0.3; 0.6 and 1.2) solid solutions were obtained by conventional solid-state reaction method from required oxides and carbonate. The Rietveld analysis of neutron diffraction patterns was realized. The linear increasing behavior of the unit cell parameters in accordance with the Vegard’s low was established which was explained by the radii of the substituted and substituting cations. It is revealed that the In3+ indium cations occupy mainly the octahedral 4fVI and 12 k and tetrahedral 4fIV positions. The maximum porosity of the samples reached 15%. The average size of particles is in the range 0.84–0.65 nm. The Curie temperature of the compounds monotonically decreases from down to ~ 520 K with increasing the x. Such behavior is a result of frustration of the magnetic ordering because of breakdown of long-range Fe3+ –O2−–Fe3+ indirect superexchange interactions. The frustrated magnetic state was detected from ZFC and FC magnetization measurements. The average size of magnetically ordered inclusions monotonically decreases with a diminishing rate of -47.3 K/x that means that the substitution leads to their fragmentation. The maximum size magnetically ordered inclusions monotonically increases with a diminishing rate of 31.9 K/x that means that the substitution leads to their overgrowth. The value of the Mr residual magnetization decreases to ~ 20.2 emu/g at room temperature. The Ms spontaneous magnetization and keff effective magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant were determined by the Law of Approach of Saturation. The amplitude of the resonance peak for the real part ε/ of the permittivity firstly increases up to ~ 3.3 at ~ 45.5 GHz for the x = 0.1 and then constantly decreases down to ~ 1.9 for the x = 1.2. The ε/ smallest value of local maximum is ~ 1.9 at 37.3 GHz for the x = 1.2. The maximum of the tg(α) dielectric loss tangent decreases from ~ 1.0 to ~ 0.7 and shifts towards low frequencies from ~ 40.6 GHz to ~ 37.3 GHz. The low-frequency maximum of the μ/ real part of permeability decreases from ~ 1.8 to ~ 0.9 and slightly shifts towards high frequencies up to ~ 34.7 GHz. The maximum of the tg(δ) magnetic loss tangent decreases from ~ 0.7 to ~ 0.5 and shifts slightly towards low frequencies from ~ 40.5 GHz to ~ 37.7 GHz. The maximum of the tg(δ) magnetic loss tangent decreases from ~ 0.7 to ~ 0.5 and shifts slightly towards low frequencies from ~ 40.5 GHz to ~ 37.7 GHz. The consistent change in the magnetic and microwave properties of the SFI-x hexaferrites is interpreted on the basis of a regular change in the saturation magnetization depending on the diamagnetic substitution by the In3+ indium cations and on the features of the transition in the type of polarization and natural ferromagnetic resonance.

References

  1. 1.

    Raha, S. & Ahmaruzzaman, Md. Novel magnetically retrievable In2O3/MoS2/Fe3O4 nanocomposite materials for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Sci. Rep. 11, 6379. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85532-8 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hwang, S. et al. Infiltrated thin film structure with hydrogel-mediated precursor ink for durable SOFCs. Sci. Rep. 11, 7109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86572-w (2021).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baki, A. et al. Influence of Sr deficiency on structural and electrical properties of SrTiO3 thin films grown by metal–organic vapor phase epitaxy. Sci. Rep. 11, 7497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87007-2 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sønsteby, H. H. et al. A foundation for complex oxide electronics—Low temperature perovskite epitaxy. Nat. Commun. 11, 2872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16654-2 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Alsharif, M. H. et al. Sixth generation (6G) wireless networks: Vision, research activities, challenges and potential solutions. Symmetry 12, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040676 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hussein, M. I. et al. Microwave absorbing properties of metal functionalized-CNT-polymer composite for stealth applications. Sci. Rep. 10, 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72928-1 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chen, F. et al. Ferromagnetic resonance induced large microwave magnetodielectric effect in cerium doped Y3Fe5O12 ferrites. Sci. Rep. 6, 28206. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28206 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Harris, V. G. Modern microwave ferrites. IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 1075–1104. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2011.2180732 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ramachandran, S. A review on ferrite devices. IETE J. Res. 9, 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.1963.11486506 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gorter, E. W. Magnetization in ferrites: Saturation magnetization of ferrites with spinel structure. Nature 165, 798–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/165798a0 (1950).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pullar, R. C. Hexagonal ferrites: A review of the synthesis, properties and applications of hexaferrite ceramics. Prog. Mater. Sci. 57, 1191–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.04.001 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kharbanda, P. et al. Ferrites: Magnetic materials as an alternate source of green electrical energy. Helyion 5, e01151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01151 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li, Q. et al. Magnetic properties of strontium hexaferrite nanostructures measured with magnetic force microscopy. Sci. Rep. 6, 25985. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25985 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ümit, Ö., Yahya, A. & Hadis, M. Microwave ferrites, part 1: Fundamental properties. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. El. 20, 789–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-009-9923-2 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jing, P. et al. Width-controlled M-type hexagonal strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) nanoribbons with high saturation magnetization and superior coercivity synthesized by electrospinning. Sci. Rep. 5, 15089. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15089 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tyagi, S., Baskey, H. B., Agarwala, R. C., Agarwala, V. & Shami, T. C. Synthesis and characterization of microwave absorbing SrFe12O19/ZnFe2O4 nanocomposite. Trans. Ind. Inst. Met. 64, 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-011-0068-7 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mehdipour, M. & Shokrollahi, H. Comparison of microwave absorption properties of SrFe12O19, SrFe12O19/NiFe2O4, and NiFe2O4 particles. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 043906. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816089 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pereira, F. M. M. et al. Magnetic and dielectric properties of the M-type barium strontium hexaferrite (BaxSr1xFe12O19) in the RF and microwave (MW) frequency range. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. El. 20, 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-008-9744-8 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Baniasadi, A., Ghasemi, A., Ghadikolaei, M. A., Nemati, A. & Paimozd, E. Microwave absorption properties of Ti–Zn substituted strontium hexaferrite. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. El. 27, 1901–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-3971-6 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Thompson, G. K. & Evans, B. J. Order-disorder and magnetic exchange interactions in substituted strontium hexaferrite SrAxFe12−xO19 (A=Ga, In). J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6643. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.356881 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim, C. S., Kim, B. & Yoon, S. Effects of In3+ site occupancy on the magnetic properties of M-type strontium hexaferrites. AIP Adv. 10, 015040. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5130073 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dixit, V. et al. Site preference and magnetic properties of Ga/In-substituted strontium hexaferrite: An ab initio study. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 203908. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4936368 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Turchenko, V. et al. Crystal and magnetic structures, magnetic and ferroelectric properties of strontium ferrite partially substituted with In ions. J. Alloys Compd. 821, 153412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153412 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Turchenko, V. et al. Structural features, magnetic and ferroelectric properties of SrFe10.8In1.2O19 compound. Mater. Res. Bull. 138, 111236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111236 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rietveld, H. M. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889869006558 (1969).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vinnik, D. A. et al. Influence of titanium substitution on structure, magnetic and electric properties of barium hexaferrites BaFe12xTixO19. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 498, 166117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166117 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B 192, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-i (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Trukhanov, S. V., Trukhanov, A. V., Vasiliev, A. N., Balagurov, A. M. & Szymczak, H. Magnetic state of the structural separated anion-deficient La0.70Sr0.30MnO2.85 manganite. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 113, 819–825. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776111130127 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vakhitov, M. G., Klygach, D. S., Vinnik, D. A., Zhivulin, V. E. & Knyazev, N. S. Microwave properties of aluminum-substituted barium hexaferrite BaFe12xAlxO19 ceramics in the frequency range of 32–50 GHz. J. Alloys Compd. 816, 152682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152682 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Trukhanov, S. V. et al. Crystal structure and magnetic properties of the BaFe12xInxO19 (x = 0.1–1.2) solid solutions. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 417, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.052 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhu, Q. et al. Chemical tuning of the magnetic properties of epitaxial BaFe12xScxO19 (0 ≤ x ≤ 2.1) hexaferrite thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 802, 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.226 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567739476001551 (1976).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Site preference, magnetic properties and energy band gap of SrFe12xInxO19. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 493, 165731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165731 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Clark, T. M., Evans, B. J., Thompson, G. K. & Freeman, S. 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopic investigation of complex magnetic structures in Ga, Sc, and In substituted M-type hexagonal ferrites. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5229–5230. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.369952 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Li, Y. X. et al. Structure, magnetic and microwave properties of indium-doped barium ferrite thick films prepared by tape casting. Mater. Res. Innov. 19, S1-410-S1-412. https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891715Z.0000000001581 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Dixit, V. et al. Site occupancy and magnetic properties of Al-substituted M-type strontium hexaferrite. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 243904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922867 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dixit, V., Kim, S.-G., Park, J. & Hong, Y.-K. Effect of ionic substitutions on the magnetic properties of strontium hexaferrite: A first principles study. AIP Adv. 7, 115209. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995309 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gupta, S., Sharma, G., Sathe, V. G., Deshpande, S. K. & Siruguri, V. Spin-phonon coupling mediated magneto-dielectricity in indium doped barium hexaferrite (BaFe10.5In1.5O19). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 492, 165717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165717 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kanwal, M., Riaz, A., Ahmad, J. & Ahmad, I. Effect of nominal Indium substitution on structural, magnetic and microwave properties of Calcium–Barium M-type hexaferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 530, 167873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167873 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Trukhanov, S. V. et al. Polarization origin and iron positions in indium doped barium hexaferrites. Ceram. Int. 44, 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.172 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Binder, K. & Young, A. P. Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 802–976. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.58.801 (1986).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Coffey, W. T. et al. The effect of an oblique magnetic field on the superparamagnetic relaxation time. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 145, L263–L267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(94)00863-9 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chantrell, R. W., Walmsley, N. S., Gore, J. & Maylin, M. Theoretical studies of the field-cooled and zero-field cooled magnetization of interacting fine particles. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4340–4342. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.370361 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Morup, S., Madsen, D. E., Fradsen, C., Bahl, C. R. H. & Hansen, M. F. Experimental and theoretical studies of nanoparticles of antiferromagnetic materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 19, 213202. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/21/213202 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Trukhanov, S. V., Trukhanov, A. V., Vasil’ev, A. N., Maignan, A. & Szymczak, H. Critical behavior of La0.825Sr0.175MnO2.912 anion-deficient manganite in the magnetic phase transition region. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 85, 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364007100086 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Trukhanov, S. V., Trukhanov, A. V., Vasiliev, A. N. & Szymczak, H. Frustrated exchange interactions formation at low temperatures and high hydrostatic pressures in La07.0Sr0.30MnO2.85. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 111, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377611008008X (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kneller, E. F. & Luborsky, F. E. Particle size dependence of coercivity and remanence of single-domain particles. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 656–658. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1729324 (1963).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bean, C. P. & Livingstone, J. D. Superparamagnetism. J. Appl. Phys. 30, S120–S129. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2185850 (1959).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Trukhanov, A. V. et al. Impact of the heat treatment conditions on crystal structure, morphology and magnetic properties evolution in BaM nanohexaferrites. J. Alloys Compd. 866, 158961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158961 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Trukhanov, S. V. et al. Magnetic properties of La0.70Sr0.30MnO2.85 anion-deficient manganite under hydrostatic pressure. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 83, 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364006010085 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wang, J., Beeli, P., Meng, L. H. & Zhao, G. M. High-temperature magnetic properties of noninteracting randomly oriented single-domain Fe3−δO4 nanoparticles. Phys. Lett. A 375, 1510–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.02.040 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Grossinger, R. A critical examination of the law of approach to saturation. I. Fit procedure. Phys. Stat. Solid (a) 66, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210660231 (1981).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Grossinger, R. Correlation between the inhomogeneity and the magnetic anisotropy in polycrystalline ferromagnetic materials. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 28, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(82)90037-3 (1982).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yang, Z., Wang, C. S., Li, X. H. & Zeng, H. X. (Zn, Ni, Ti) substituted barium ferrite particles with improved temperature coefficient of coercivity. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 90, 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(01)00925-4 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Stoner, E. C. & Wohlfarth, E. P. A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys. IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 3475–3518. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1991.1183750 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Topkaya, R. Effect of composition and temperature on the magnetic properties of BaBixLaxFe(12−2x)O19 (0.0 < x < 0.2) hexaferrites. Appl. Phys. A 123, 488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-017-1115-y (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hauser, H., Jiles, D. C., Melikhov, Y., Li, L. & Grossinger, R. An approach to modeling the dependence of magnetization on magnetic field in the high field regime. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 300, 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.05.017 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Nicolson, A. M. & Ross, G. F. Measurement of the intrinsic properties of materials by time-domain techniques. IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas. 19, 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.1970.4313932 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Klygach, D. S. et al. Measurement of permittivity and permeability of barium hexaferrite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 465, 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.05.054 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Vinnik, D. A. et al. Electromagnetic properties of BaFe12O19: Ti at centimeter wavelengths. J. Alloys Compd. 755, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.315 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kittel, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1996).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Klygach, D. S. et al. MCC: Specific of preparation, correlation of the phase composition and electrodynamic properties. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 526, 167694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167694 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Shlimas, D. I., Kozlovskiy, A. L. & Zdorovets, M. V. Study of the formation effect of the cubic phase of LiTiO2 on the structural optical and mechanical properties of Li2±xTi1±xO3 ceramics with different contents of the X component. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 32(6), 7410–7422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-05454-z (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kozlovskiy, A. L., Shlimas, D. I. & Zdorovets, M. V. Synthesis structural properties and shielding efficiency of glasses based on TeO2-(1-x)ZnO-xSm2O3. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 32(9), 12111–12120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-05839-0 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kozlovskiy, A. et al. Evaluation of the efficiency of detection and capture of manganese in aqueous solutions of FeCeOx nanocomposites doped with Nb2O5. Sensors 20(17), 4851. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174851 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zdorovets, M. V., Kozlovskiy, A. L., Shlimas, D. I. & Borgekov, D. B. Phase transformations in FeCo – Fe2CoO4/Co3O4-spinel nanostructures as a result of thermal annealing and their practical application. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 32(12), 16694–16705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06226-5 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhumatayeva, I. Z., Kenzhina, I. E. Kozlovskiy, A. L. & Zdorovets, M. V. The study of the prospects for the use of Li0.15Sr0.85TiO3 ceramics. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 31(9), 6764–6772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03234-9 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kozlovskiy, A. L. & Zdorovets, M. V. Effect of doping of Ce4+/3+ on optical strength and shielding properties of (0.5-x)TeO2-0.25MoO-0.25Bi2O3-xCeO2 glasses. Mater. Chem. Phys. 263, 124444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124444 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kozlovskiy, A. L. & Zdorovets, M. V. Synthesis structural strength and corrosion properties of thin films of the type CuX (X = Bi Mg Ni). JJ. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 30(12), 11819–11832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01556-x (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Investigations were performed under financial support from the Russian Science Foundation (Agreement No. 19-19-00694 of 06 May 2019).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contribution of each author: V.A.T.—realization and treatment of neutron diffraction studies, review and editing; S.V.T.—realization of magnetization and microwave studies and interpretation of the results, conceptualization, supervision, analysis of results and article design; V.G.K.—realization of magnetization and microwave studies and interpretation of the results, data curation, review and editing; F.D.—realization and treatment of neutron diffraction studies; F.P.—realization and treatment of neutron diffraction studies; D.S.K.—realization of microwave studies and interpretation of the results; M.G.V.—realization of microwave studies and interpretation of the results; D.L.—realization of microwave studies and interpretation of the results; D.M.—realization of microwave studies and interpretation of the results; B.B.—realization of magnetization studies and interpretation of the results; I.F.—realization of magnetization studies and interpretation of the results; M.A.A.—data curation, interpretation of magnetic data, review and editing; Y.S.—data curation, interpretation of magnetic data, review and editing; A.B.—data curation, interpretation of magnetic data, review and editing; D.Z.—data curation, interpretation of dielectric data, review and editing; A.V.T.—realization of magnetization and microwave studies and interpretation of the results, supervision, interpretation of data review and editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Trukhanov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turchenko, V.A., Trukhanov, S.V., Kostishin, V.G. et al. Features of structure, magnetic state and electrodynamic performance of SrFe12−xInxO19. Sci Rep 11, 18342 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97684-8

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing