Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89889-8, published online 21 May 2021


The original version of this Article contained an error in the legend of Figure 4.


“Quantification of ET and GCX damage markers by ELISA. ET endothelium, GCX glycocalyx, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, TM thrombomodulin, aPC activated protein C, SDC-1 syndecan-1, HSPG heparan sulfate proteoglycan. *P = 0.008 vs no-dilution, **P = 0.003 vs PS, ***P = 0.016 vs no-dilution, ****P = 0.005 vs PS, §P = 0.021 vs no-dilution, P = 0.0009 vs no-dilution 0.018 vs PS, ††P = 0.018 vs PS 0.0009 vs no-dilution, †††P = 0.003 vs no-dilution, ††††P = 0.045 vs PS.”


now reads:


“Quantification of ET and GCX damage markers by ELISA. ET, endothelium; GCX, glycocalyx; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; TM, thrombomodulin; aPC, activated protein C; SDC-1, syndecan-1; HSPG, heparan sulfate proteoglycan. *P = 0.008 vs no-dilution, **P = 0.003 vs PS, ***P = 0.016 vs no-dilution, ****P =0.005 vs PS, §P = 0.021 vs no-dilution, P = 0.0009 vs no-dilution, ††P = 0.018 vs PS, †††P = 0.003 vs no-dilution, ††††P = 0.045 vs PS.”


The original Article has been corrected.