Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Functional human iPSC-derived alveolar-like cells cultured in a miniaturized 96‑Transwell air–liquid interface model

Abstract

In order to circumvent the limited access and donor variability of human primary alveolar cells, directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) into alveolar-like cells, provides a promising tool for respiratory disease modeling and drug discovery assays. In this work, a unique, miniaturized 96-Transwell microplate system is described where hiPSC-derived alveolar-like cells were cultured at an air–liquid interface (ALI). To this end, hiPSCs were differentiated into lung epithelial progenitor cells (LPCs) and subsequently matured into a functional alveolar type 2 (AT2)-like epithelium with monolayer-like morphology. AT2-like cells cultured at the physiological ALI conditions displayed characteristics of AT2 cells with classical alveolar surfactant protein expressions and lamellar-body like structures. The integrity of the epithelial barriers between the AT2-like cells was confirmed by applying a custom-made device for 96-parallelized transepithelial electric resistance (TEER) measurements. In order to generate an IPF disease-like phenotype in vitro, the functional AT2-like cells were stimulated with cytokines and growth factors present in the alveolar tissue of IPF patients. The cytokines stimulated the secretion of pro-fibrotic biomarker proteins both on the mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) and protein level. Thus, the hiPSC-derived and cellular model system enables the recapitulation of certain IPF hallmarks, while paving the route towards a miniaturized medium throughput approach of pharmaceutical drug discovery.

Introduction

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) incorporate a large group of parenchymal lung disorders affecting the pulmonary interstitium, which cause progressive scarring and inflammation of the lung tissue. Risk factors may include smoking, environmental exposures and family history of the disease1, but a significant proportion of cases is rated as idiopathic, implying an unknown cause of the disease1. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common and pernicious type among ILDs with unknown etiology. It is characterized through progressive fibrosis within the lung epithelium1,2,3, involving alveolar epithelial cells but also macrophages, monocytes and local fibroblasts4. Current treatment options are highly limited3, no other drugs than nintedanib (Ofev) and pirfenidone (Esbriet) are approved for the treatment of IPF5. For both drugs, cellular effects on the level of fibroblasts and anti-inflammatory activities have been described3. In contrast, disease intervention on the level of the epithelial cells has so far not been thoroughly explored6.

A chronic damage of the alveolar epithelium is thought to be causal in the pathogenesis of IPF7. The human alveolar epithelium consists of alveolar type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) cells. AT2s exhibit a cuboidal morphology and cover 3–5% of the alveoli surface area8. They play key roles in the maintenance of a proper alveolus function possessing different protective and regenerative properties9,10,11. They carry out the synthesis, secretion and recycling of different substances like pulmonary surfactants including surfactant protein A, B, C, and D (SFTPA, SFTPB, SFTPC, SFTPD) and other protective biomolecules1,8. With the aid of these surfactants, proper surface tension can be maintained stabilizing alveolar size, keeping the alveoli dry and facilitating breathing12. Besides, the AT2 cells are not only capable of proliferating into new AT2 cells, but they also serve as facultative progenitors for AT1 cells, thus being involved in alveolar repair and homeostasis13,14. The specialized AT1 cells take up a large portion of the total surface of the human alveoli and serve as key players in the regulation of the gas exchange9,15. With their flattened and branched morphology, they build a very large and thin apical surface, which enables them to conduct a potent gas exchange16. Importantly, both alveolar cells types are closely connected through tight-junctions (TJs) to form a robust epithelial barrier. Dysfunctional AT2 cells are presumably linked to fibrotic processes in the lung17,18, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2, pulmonary fibrosis4,5 and lung cancer19. To foster drug discovery in this regard, a translational cellular in vitro model of the alveolar epithelial layer is urgently needed to support pre-clinical research projects addressing causes and treatment of IPF in the human lung.

To better understand the various mechanisms driving the disease, it is important to have a predictive in vitro system that can resemble the human physiological situation. Immortalized cell lines, such as lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells, have been widely used instead of primary cells20,21. However, they fail to reproduce several features of the physiological epithelium due to their phenotypes altered by culture conditions22,23. Models based on human primary small airway and alveolar epithelial cells are currently the most predictive ones, but they have also their limitations. Despite the well-known proliferative capacity of AT2 cells in vivo, however, primary AT2 cells in vitro may not be expanded beyond a few passages24,25. Importantly, the use of primary alveolar cells is further complicated by their tendency to spontaneously trans-differentiate to terminally differentiated AT1 cells26. Additionally, the access to non-diseased human primary alveolar cells is highly limited and cost intensive, rendering them less suitable for the application in large-scale cultures and medium throughput screenings27.

An alternative strategy is working with human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Since Takahashi and Yamanaka established the nuclear reprogramming of adult cells to a pluripotent cell fate in 200628, these cells have been explored as an alternative cell source for the replacement of cell lines and primary cells. This technology offers an unlimited number of tissue-specific cells that can be used in highly predictive in vitro models29. Ideally, hiPSC-derived cell populations would include the different subtypes of alveolar epithelial cells, which would resemble the physiological situation of the human lung30,31. Such a controlled and targeted differentiation of hiPSCs towards alveolar cells would be an ideal cellular model for studying epithelial dysfunction in IPF. However, the differentiation of hiPSCs to lung epithelial cells has been challenging: While various differentiation protocols are available in literature32,33, so far, the hiPSC-derived alveolar cells have not thoroughly been studied under ALI conditions34. Recent studies reported protocols for the directed generation of functional stem cell-derived alveolar cells and their applications in respiratory disease research32,35,36,37,38,39. These latter studies relied on directed in vitro differentiation of hiPSCs into alveolar cells based on the induction of Definitive Endoderm (DE)40, followed by Anterior Foregut Endoderm (AFE) specification, patterning into ventral Anterior Foregut (vAFE) fate, into lung progenitor cells (LPCs) and subsequent maturation into various lung epithelial cell types33,41,42. One key step was the development of NK2 Homeobox 1 (NKX2-1+) LPCs using a mixture of growth factors, that can be subsequently matured into an alveolar fate by continued culture under submerged or 3D organoid conditions35,43,44. In contrast, other protocols position the in vitro epithelium on a synthetic membrane at the boundary between air and culture medium, known as air–liquid interface (ALI)45,46,47. However, most of the published protocols contain 3D differentiation steps, such as embryoid body or organoid formation. Additionally, they are restricted to the commonly used large scale formats (e.g. 24-Transwell plates) which hamper the application of ALI conditions to higher throughput profiling of drug candidates. A 2D monolayer-like differentiation protocol combined with a cell banking step of LPCs has never been reported yet. In this work, the flask-based LPC generation was decoupled from the 96-Transwell-based final maturation into AT2-like cells. Although, hiPSC-derived lung epithelial cell models have been used for disease modelling45,48, they have so far never been miniaturized and applied to medium throughput applications to a similar extent.

In summary, the aim of the work was to establish a stepwise differentiation protocol of hiPSCs into human alveolar-like cells, including cell banking steps of intermediate stages, for the study of epithelial dysfunction in IPF. In addition, a miniaturized 96-Transwell ALI format was developed, opening new routes towards target-focused and phenotypic drug discovery49.

Results

Generation of functional monolayer AT2-like cells out of hiPSCs including cell banking steps of intermediate stages

Within this work the generation of functional hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells was successfully achieved through the directed in vitro differentiation of hiPSCs involving the recapitulation of the complex in vivo development of the lung. This was accomplished through precise timing of activation or inhibition of specific signaling pathways relevant in the embryogenesis of the human lung. LPC maturation toward AT2-like cells was carried out on 96-Transwell inserts at ALI to resemble the physiological environment of the mature human alveolar epithelium. The here described differentiation protocol (illustrated in Fig. 1a), which focused on culture conditions and suitability in upscaled applications, incorporates various elements of previously established methods, e.g. of Gotoh et al.35 and Yamamoto et al.50. This protocol allows for the efficient generation of functional 2D AT2-like cells out of hiPSCs including cell banking steps of intermediate stages.

Figure 1
figure 1

Optimized stepwise differentiation protocol of induced pluripotent stem cells towards alveolar-like cells including cell banking steps. (a) Schematic of the stepwise differentiation triggered through different proteins and small molecules. NaB = Sodium Butyrate, ActA = Activin A, RI = Y27632, ATRA = All-trans-retinoic-acid, DEX = dexamethasone. (bh) Relative expression levels at daily intervals during differentiation to definitive endoderm (DE) confirms up-regulation of DE markers within 6 days. Targeted differentiation leads to loss of pluripotency within 6 days. (ik) Representative immunofluorescence staining for classical DE marker expression in hiPSCs following 6 days of directed differentiation (i: SOX17, j: CXCR4, k: EpCAM, nuclei: Hochest33342). Scale bar = 50 µm. (l) Schematic of included freezing step at day 6 of DE differentiation.

First, the selected ChiPSC18 line was characterized with respect to pluripotency. Both on protein and mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) level, the selected hiPSCs expressed classical pluripotency markers, such as octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), Nanog Homeobox (NANOG) and SRY-Box Transcription Factor 2 (SOX2) (see Supplementary Fig. S1a–e, online). Additionally, the differentiation potential towards all three germ layers was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining of SRY-Box Transcription Factor 17 (SOX17)/C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4 (CXCR4) (Endoderm), Nestin (Ectoderm) and Brachyury (Mesoderm) (see Supplementary Fig. S1f–i, online). By subsequently applying a previously established scalable DE expansion protocol40, the generated DE cells displayed key markers such as SOX17, CXCR4, Mix Paired-Like Homeobox (MIXL), E-Cadherin (CDH1), Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EPCAM), KIT Proto-Oncogene and Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (cKIT) in a RT-PCR analysis. In parallel, the loss of pluripotency markers such as OCT4 within 6 days of differentiation was demonstrated (Fig. 1b–h). DE cell identity was also confirmed by immunofluorescence staining for SOX17, CXCR4 and EPCAM. Before proceeding to the next steps of the differentiation protocol, the DE cells were cryopreserved and stored in aliquots (Fig. 1i–l).

Frozen stocks of generated DE cells were used for the subsequent AFE transition (Fig. 2a). The differentiation potential was maintained during the cryopreservation step, indicated by the thawed cells expressing classical DE marker proteins and their typical polygonal and cuboidal morphology (see Supplementary Fig. S2a–c, online). A kinetics experiment of AFE formation demonstrated highest gene expression on day 8 of differentiation, verified by mRNA expression of AFE stage markers FOXA2 (Forkhead Box A2) and SOX2 (Fig. 2b,c). Corresponding protein expression was confirmed by immunofluorescence (Fig. 2d–i). In direct comparison, the cryopreserved DE stocks showed a differentiation potential towards AFE cells comparable to non-cryopreserved DE cells (see Supplementary Fig. S2d–i, online).

Figure 2
figure 2

Generation of Lung Progenitor Cells (LPCs) following the Definitive Endoderm Formation. (a) Schematic of freezing thawing cycle and subsequent AFE differentiation of previous generated DE cells. (b,c) Relative expression levels during differentiation towards Anterior Foregut Endoderm (AFE) confirmed by the up regulation of the markers SOX2 and FOXA2 within following 4 days. (di) Representative immunofluorescence staining for AFE marker expression in hiPSCs following 4 days of directed differentiation (d: bright field, e: SOX2, f: merged bright field and SOX2; g: bright field, h: FOXA2, i: merged bright field and FOXA2). Scale bar = 400 µm. (jl) Up-regulation of LPC markers NKX2.1, SOX9 and ID2 based on the efficient generation of ventralized AFE (vAFE) cells, within 10 days. (mo) Representative immunofluorescence staining of the LPC marker NKX2.1 at day 13 (m), day 18 (n) and day 21 (o) of differentiation. Scale bar = 100 µm. (p) Representative FACS plots based on expression of CPM and NKX2.1 (marker for LPCs) in hiPSC-derived LPCs (day 21). Percentages of positive cells are shown in each plot based on isotype control gating strategies. (q) Schematic of differentiation process and essential marker expressions prior to lung progenitor cell banking. Depicted are means ± 95% CI of at least three independent experiments.

Following the patterning to vAFE and LPC induction, hiPSC-derived intermediate states displayed increased expression of NKX2.1, SRY-Box Transcription Factor 9 (SOX9) and Inhibitor of DNA Binding 2 (ID2) over time, with highest gene expression levels on day 21 of differentiation (Fig. 2j–l). These findings could be confirmed by the time-dependent protein expression of NKX2.1 detected by immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 2m–o). To ensure efficient generation of LPCs prior to cryopreservation, cells were analyzed regarding the lung progenitor markers Carboxypeptidase M (CPM) and NKX2.1. Based on flow cytometry data, 73% of the differentiated LPCs at day 21 were CPM positive and 89% NKX2.1 positive compared to the respective isotype controls (Fig. 2p). Kinetics of CPM protein expression in LPCs displayed highest expression at day 21, based on immunofluorescence staining (see Supplementary Fig. S3, online). Furthermore, unmeant patterning of LPCs towards thyroid like cells was excluded by the negative staining of Paired-Box-Protein 8 (PAX8) (0.14%) (Supplementary Fig. S13, online). A 3D LPC culture was utilized to additionally confirm the budding and branching potential of the hiPSC-derived LPCs, which constitutes a key functional feature of fetal epithelial progenitors during lung morphogenesis (see Supplementary Fig. S2j,k, online). Moreover, throughout the differentiation from hiPSCs (day 0) to LPCs (day 21), the number of cells increased by a factor of 4.8 (see Supplementary Fig. 2l, online). Based on these data sets cryopreservation and cell banking of LPCs was established on day 21 of hiPSC differentiation (Fig. 2q).

Subsequently, to induce specification into AT2-like cells, LPCs were seeded from cryopreserved cell stocks onto 96-Transwell inserts and confluent cultures were further differentiated at an air–liquid-interface until day 27. Finally, cells expressed mature AT2 markers such as SFTPC, SFTPB and ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 3 (ABCA3) significantly higher compared to hiPSCs (day 0) (p < 0.0003, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0033) in line with the significant decrease of a pluripotency fate (OCT4, p < 0.0001). In addition, the expression of the lamellar body-associated protein LPCAT-1 (Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1) was also significantly induced during the differentiation process (p < 0.0029) (Fig. 3a–e). As shown in Fig. 3i,j, markers related to an AT1 phenotype such as PDPN (Podoplanin) and CAV1 (Caveolin-1), were also present in the AT2-like cultures, whereas no significant differences in expression levels were detected compared to Human Pulmonary Alveolar Epithelial Cell (HPAEpiC) levels (p < 0.2258, p < 0.0790). Furthermore, differentiated cells on day 27 showed significantly upregulated expression of the human alveolar epithelial progenitor marker TM4SF1 (member of the transmembrane 4 superfamily) (p < 0.0078), as well as the early lung progenitor marker NKX2.1 compared to hiPSC (p < 0.0039) (Fig. 3g,h). Among other alveolar epithelial associated transcripts (see Supplementary Fig. S5a,b,g, online), the pan-epithelial marker CDH1 as well as tight junction markers were highly expressed in the day 27 differentiated AT2-like cultures (Fig. 3f, Supplementary Fig. 5c–e, online). Comparison of protein analysis of surfactants in both hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells and HAEpiC showed a 2.4-fold higher protein expression for SFTPC and 1.7-fold higher expression of SFTPB (see Supplementary Fig. S4k, online). For statistical details see Supplementary Tables S415, online.

Figure 3
figure 3

Confirmation of AT2-like phenotype of hiPSC-derived air–liquid interface (ALI) cultures verified on both protein and mRNA level. (al) One-step RT-PCR analysis of different lung cell markers. Statistical comparison between day 27 differentiated alveolar like cell, hiPSC (day 0) and HPAEpiC isolated total RNA. (a) OCT4 pluripotency marker (be) expression levels of classical AT2 cell markers. (f) CDH1 as a marker for epithelial cells. (g,h) TM4SF1 and NKX2.1 as alveolar lung progenitor marker. (i,j) Classical markers for alveolar type 1 cells. Median; range [min, max], N = 3; nd = not detectable, ns = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. (km) Immunofluorescence staining of SFTPC at day 27 of differentiation. (k) white: Hoechst33342, green: Phalloidin; (l) red: SFTPC, merged picture; (m) magnification of overlay. (n,o) SFTPB (red) and CDH1 (green) staining in AT2-like cells. Scale bar = 20 µm. (pr) ABCA3 and (u-w) CDH1 staining in AT2-like cells after 27 days of differentiation. Scale bar = 20 µm. (s,t) Immunofluorescence staining of AT1 marker CAV1 (orange). Scale bar = 20 µm.

Immunofluorescence stainings showed the homogeneous expression of E-Cadherin (CDH1) and confirmed the presence of SFTPC+, ABCA3+, SFTPB+, CAV1+ cells, indicative of an AT2 cell phenotype (Fig. 3k–w). Semi-quantitative analysis of stainings revealed 87% ± 8.4 of cells were SFTPC+. Additionally, the hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells contained large organelles displaying intensive accumulation of SFTPC and also stain double positive for NKX2.1 and SFTPC, shown in Supplementary Figs. 4e–i; 4l–o, online. Furthermore, Hematoxylin and Eosin staining of cross-sectioned 96-Transwell cultures revealed physiological monolayer-like arrangement of AT2-like cells (see Supplementary Fig. 5h,i, online).

Trans-Epithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER) measurements confirmed the formation of tight lung epithelial structures in hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells. As shown in Fig. 4a, the integrity of the formed lung epithelium was significantly established after 7 days of ALI culture in the 96-Transwell plates (1189; [9489, 1502] Ω × cm2, p < 0.003). In comparison to more proximal cell types like human small airway epithelial cell (hSAEC) cultures AT2-like cells showed significantly higher TEER function (p < 0.0001). Evaluation of AT2-like TEER values to literature data of human primary alveolar epithelial cells, showed no significant difference (p < 0.7345), (Fig. 4b). For statistical details see Supplementary Tables S16 and 17, online. Furthermore, the exposure of the AT2-like cells to the air through the ALI conditions supported the maturation of cells, as SFTPB and SFTPC expression exemplarily showed (Fig. 4l–o). As depicted in Fig. 4p semi-quantitative analysis showed a significant increase in both, SFTPC and SFTPB cell populations under ALI conditions (SFTPC: p = 0.0007; SFTPB: p = 0.001). Additionally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images clearly showed the presence of AT2 specific lamellar bodies, microvilli (MV), dense apical tight junctions, desmosomes and multi vesicular bodies (Fig. 4c–k). This indicates that functional AT2-like cells were efficiently generated during the maturation phase (see also Supplementary Fig. S4a–d). The hiPSC-derived AT2-like cell cultures were also analyzed regarding other endodermal phenotypes. No similarities were detected between AT2-like cells and hepatocytes (Alpha-1-Fetoprotein expression51,52), thyroid-like cells (PAX8 expression in LPCs) or proximal airway markers (see Supplementary Figs. S5f, S6, S13, online).

Figure 4
figure 4

Characterization of hiPSC-derived alveolar like cells cultured under ALI conditions. (a) Change in TEER over 1 week of ALI culture. (b) Comparison of TEER values between primary human small airway cells (hSAEC), literature based human pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells (HPAEpiC) and the generated AT2-like cells. Median; range [min, max], N = 5; ns = not significant, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. (ck) Representative electron microscopy images of lamellar bodies in hiPSC-derived AT2 cells (white arrow heads c,d) of lamellar bodies showing classical lamellar structures (e). Typical microvilli structures at the surface of the cells (f) and characteristic multivesicular bodies indicated with white arrow heads (g). Tight cell–cell desmosome contacts indicated by the white arrow heads (h). (ik) Apical tight junctions indicated by white arrow heads. M = mitochondria; N = nucleus; LB = lamellar body; MV = microvilli; MB = multivesicular body. Scale bar = 500 nm; magnification scale bars = 100 nm. (lo) Exemplary surfactant expression in ALI versus submerged conditions (l,m) Immunofluorescence staining of SFTPB at day 27 of differentiation of hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells cultured under submerged or ALI conditions, respectively. (n,o) Immunofluorescence staining of SFTPC at day 27 of differentiation of hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells cultured under submerged or ALI conditions, respectively. Scale bars = 400 µm. (p) Comparison of submerged and ALI cultures, based on semi-quantitative analysis of SFTPB and SFTPC expressing cells.

The here established generation of functional monolayer AT2-like cells out of hiPSCs was also reproducible in two alternative hiPSC lines (see Supplementary Figs. S710, online).

Functional analysis of hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells in 96-Transwell format and subsequent changes in pro-fibrotic marker expression levels

Transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), Tumor-Necrosis-Factor-α (TNF-α) and Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) are key mediators of IPF disease pathogenesis53,54. The respective cytokine challenges were replicated in vitro by administration of cytokines and growth factors to ALI-matured hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells in 96-Transwell plates (Fig. 5). In order to monitor the cellular response to the respective stimulus, changes in secretion and expression levels of distinct pro-fibrotic proteins were measured over the period of 72 hours (h).

Figure 5
figure 5

Physiological changes in transcriptional and secretory levels of known pro-fibrotic proteins caused by stimulation of hiPSC-derived alveolar like 2 cells in the presence of different cytokines and growth factors. (ad) Time-dependent relative expression and secretion of MMP10 (a,b) and Fibronectin (c,d) on protein and mRNA level due to 10 ng/mL TGFβ-1 stimulation, normalized to unstimulated control cells. (e,f) Time-dependent relative expression of Fibronectin on protein and mRNA level due to 10 ng/mL IL-1β stimulation, normalized to unstimulated control cells. (gl) Time-dependent relative expression of MMP10 (g,h), Fibronectin (i,j) and MCP-1 (k,l) on secreted protein and mRNA level due to 10 ng/mL TNF-α stimulation, normalized to unstimulated control cells. Median; range [min, max], N = 3; nd = not detectable, ns = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

In IPF, TGF-β1 is a key inducer of Metalloproteinase (MMP) expression besides other pro-fibrotic biomarkers. Specifically, MMP10 is known to correlate with disease severity55,56. Concurring with the human situation, a significant time-dependent increase in MMP10 expression, both on protein (p < 0.0001) and mRNA level (p < 0.0001) was observed (Fig. 5a,b). Additionally, TGF-β1 is known to induce elevated levels of fibronectin deposition57. In agreement with the in vivo pathogenesis, TGF-β1 was found to significantly increase the secretion of fibronectin (p < 0.0001), as well as the expression on mRNA level (p < 0.0005) from AT2-like cells (Fig. 5c,d).

Similar results were found in stimulation experiments with IL-1β. Protein expression levels of fibronectin were significantly increased over time (p < 0.001), whereas on gene expression level 8.8-fold higher expression levels were detected 6 h after stimulation compared to control cells (8.78; [6.72, 9.84]) (Fig. 5e,f).

TNF-α has also been shown to induce the secretion of MMP10, fibronectin, as well as the Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in IPF disease pathology58,59,60. Reflecting this in vivo biology in the 96-Transwell plates, TNF-α induced ALI matured AT2-like cells to significantly increase the release of MMP10, fibronectin and MCP-1, with highest secretion after 72 h of stimulation (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5g,i,k). Likewise, highest mRNA expression levels were detected 6 h after stimulation with 120-fold (MMP10), fourfold (fibronectin) and 700-fold (MCP-1) higher expression levels compared to control cells (Fig. 5h,j,l). Detailed statistics for all stimulation experiments are provided in Supplementary Tables S1829, online. To exclude any cytotoxic effects, a LDH (Lactate dehydrogenase) release assay was performed over the time course of 72 h. No significant differences in comparison to vehicle controls were observed, supporting the suitability of the model to serve as a physiological relevant assay system to study epithelial dysfunction in lung diseases (see Supplementary Fig. S5j, online).

Discussion

This study implemented a novel medium throughout, 2D monolayer-like, hiPSC-derived 96-Transwell ALI model of alveolar epithelial cells, to investigate epithelial dysfunction. This work demonstrates the suitability of the model to serve as a physiological assay system to study the effects of IPF-relevant cytokines and growth factors regarding the secretion of IPF associated biomarkers.

As working with hiPSCs is still an emerging field, other studies have also reported the generation of AT2-like cells, based on both embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells35,43,46,50,61,62,63,64,65. However, protocols suitable for drug development and medium throughput applications have not been reported yet. The differentiation protocol established in this study followed these published strategies, but also included major modifications and significant improvements regarding cell banking and the decoupling of subsequent maturation of cells in 96-Transwell ALI cultures.

In fact, the objectives of this work were the following: (1) establishing an optimized differentiation protocol generating robust DE cells and the subsequent cryopreservation (2) generating LPCs and the following cell banking step as a major intermediate stage of differentiation (3) the decoupling of the final maturation process into alveolar-like cells in miniaturized 96-Transwell ALI cultures and (4) the application of the AT2-like cells to study epithelial dysfunction in IPF, as a canonical example to establish this highly physiological in vitro model.

First, an optimized stepwise differentiation of hiPSCs into DE cells with respect to DE cell amplification was described, based on a previously published protocol40. The produced DE cells were demonstrated to express classical DE markers on the gene expression and protein level. Furthermore, cryopreservation of DE cells could be established, maintaining their differentiation potential towards subsequent AFE stage, highlighted by clear DE marker expression after the cryopreservation and comparable SOX2+ and FOXA2+ AFE cells after 10 days of differentiation. The capability of the rethawed DE cells to differentiate into AFE cells corroborates the feasibility of the cryopreservation step.

Second, another major advantage regarding upscaling compatibility was the cryopreservation step on the level of lung progenitor cells. Based on cryopreserved DE cells, the generation of NKX2.1+/CPM+/SOX9+ LPCs was achieved within 21 days of differentiation. In line with other published protocols, a reproducible homogeneity of 73–89% in LPC cultures prior to cryopreservation was achieved (based on CPM and NKX2.1 staining)35,50. In contrast to several other protocols35,46,50,66,67, no sorting of cells prior to maturation was necessary. As the following analysis showed, this was an optimal condition to generate the desired AT2-like cells. Notably, based on the here presented work, the number of cells increased by a factor of 4.8-fold over the differentiation from hiPSCs to LPCs. This offers the possibility to use this highly physiological model for typical compound optimization campaigns in medicinal chemistry, where huge cell numbers are required.

The generation of stem cell-derived lung cells is one of the most complex endeavors due to the multistage embryology of the human lung. In comparison to the differentiation of other cell types, the within this study established 6-step differentiation protocol is complex and difficult to implement68,69,70. Therefore, the cryopreservation steps of DE cells and LPCs is an innovative, time-saving approach, so that such a highly physiological in vitro model can be provided in a reasonable format for upscaled applications in drug discovery research.

Third, key properties of medium throughput applications are the automation as well as the miniaturization of drug discovery assays. The decoupling of the final maturation of LPCs into AT2-like cells in 96-Transwell plates, serves these requirements. Classical Transwell cultures with human primary cells or stem cell- derived cells were mainly maintained in 24- or 12-Transwell plates and are therefore highly limited in their throughput. The here established 2D monolayer-like cultures provide easy morphological tracking of cells throughout the differentiation process and do not require complex 3D arrangements regarding spheroid and organoid formation. Despite these 3D applications are widely used even in the lung field, they have their limitations concerning variability of spheroid size, morphology and accessibility to cells in their matrices71,72. In contrast to the 3D arrangements, the ALI conditions enable the exposure of the AT2-like cells to the air, mimicking even more the human physiological situation. Additionally, downstream applications such as imaging and lysis of cells for PCR analysis is easier to implement and more convenient to work with in the 2D monolayer-like cell cultures. In addition, the miniaturization and the 2D monolayer-like ALI culture approach leads to a reduction in consumables and cost savings and simultaneously leads to a higher throughput. Furthermore, this 96-Transwell system is applicable to a robotic system73 to reduce the required manual working capacity and therefore provides a medium throughput platform towards pharmaceutical drug discovery.

While ALI cultures have been applied to primary human airway cells and hiPSC-derived airway epithelial cells to enhance maturation, this method had previously not been tested in a miniaturized 96-Transwell format46,61,74,75,76. To mimic the physiological situation of the alveolar epithelium in vitro, cells were exposed to the air through the ALI conditions. This supported the maturation of cells, as ratios of SFTPC and SFTPB in submerged versus ALI cultures showed. Pulmonary surfactants are crucial components of the alveolar epithelium, since they lower surface tension77 and consequently many studies rely on the expression on protein and mRNA level of SFTPC and SFTPB to determine the AT2 phenotype35,50,64,78. As highlighted in the results, SFTPC and the lamellar body associated protein LPCAT-1 are significantly higher expressed compared to HPAEpiC, underlying the efficient generation of the disease relevant AT2-like cells in a physiological manner. This is in line with the clear presence of lamellar bodies in TEM images, AT2 specific surfactant producing and storing organelles79,80. Likewise, the presence of AT1 cells, was demonstrated in the here described alveolar-like cell cultures. No significant differences in marker expression levels of matured day 27 cell cultures compared to HPAEpiC were detected regarding AT1 markers, emphasizing the physiological composition and relevance of the model. Furthermore TM4SF1, a marker for alveolar epithelial progenitor cells within the adult human lung, is present in the AT2-like cultures81. Remarkably, the generated AT2-like cells stain positive for ABCA3, a marker which is not detectable in fetal lungs prior to 22–23 weeks of gestation, again underlying the physiology of the cells82. Additionally, the proper epithelial barrier function was confirmed by the expression of different tight junction proteins, as wells as the presence of strong cell–cell contacts in TEM images. Moreover, the generated AT2-like cells show a strong polarization with classical microvilli at the apical surface of the cells, which is in line with physiological TEER values after 1 week of ALI culture. In comparison to primary human alveolar cells, no significant difference in TEER values was detected, highlighting the physiological relevance of the cell model.

Due to the plastic differentiation potential of hiPSCs, the within this work generated hiPSC-derived AT2-like cell cultures were also analyzed regarding other endodermal phenotypes. No similarities were detected, underlying the efficient generation of mature AT2-like cells. Thus, despite the complex differentiation protocol and the difficulties of the maturation of cells in miniaturized 96-Transwell ALI cultures, these results confirm, that this model closely resembles the human physiological situation in vitro.

Fourth, the here established model of hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells was applied to study epithelial dysfunction in IPF. The pathogenesis of IPF is very complex and the disease-specific milieu within the lung has been suggested to play a central role in the development and progression for the disease83,84. TGF-β1 is known to be a key disease mediator85,86,87. In IPF lungs, TGF-β1 promotes the release of other pro-inflammatory molecules and induces the secretion of pro-fibrotic markers, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) components, e.g. collagen or fibronectin7. In agreement with that, the stimulation of AT2-like cells with 10 ng/mL of the TGF-β1 lead to a significant secretion of the pro-fibrotic marker protein fibronectin over the time course of 72 h. Apart from TGF-β1, also TNF-α and IL-1β play important roles in IPF pathogenesis54,88,89. Similarly, to TGF-β1, TNF-α and IL-1β both induce the release of the ECM protein fibronectin, verified by protein secretion and mRNA expression levels. These cytokines are also known to induce an overproduction of MMPs, such as MMP1090, as well as pro-inflammatory chemokines such as MCP-189,91,92. Correspondingly, TNF-α and TGF-β1 induced the release of MMP10, whereas TNF-α additionally stimulated the release of MCP-1. Taken together, the iPSC-derived in vitro model reacts in a highly physiological manner and therefore resembles certain IPF-related changes in epithelial transcription and secretion levels of pro-fibrotic marker proteins.

Of note, in cells stimulated by TNF-α or IL-1β, the first 6 h showed the highest mRNA levels of pro-fibrotic markers. This contrasts with TGF-β1 stimulated cells, where marker mRNA levels were still significantly increasing over the time of 72 h. The underlying differences could be based on the different signaling pathways, mRNA turnover and subsequent feedback loops trigged by different cytokines and growth factors. TGF-β1 mainly signals through Smad signaling in fibrotic diseases93,94, whereas TNF-α had earlier been recognized to stimulate nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)-mediated signaling4,95. IL-1β is known to trigger intracellular signaling cascades that induce as well the NF-κB signaling, leading to the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and secondary mediators of the inflammatory response96,97. Following, the turnover of mRNA transcripts and subsequent protein translation in these signaling pathways may differ. This corresponds well with the observation in mRNA expression levels in IL-1β and TNF-α stimulated AT2-like cells compared to their corresponding protein expressions.

As a complex cellular interplay leads to the pathogenesis of IPF98, the here developed model system enables a perfect platform for co-cultures, such as fibroblasts, immune cells and endothelial cells to better understand the role of a pro-fibrotic extracellular milieu in such a complex physiologically relevant setting. The implemented 96-Transwell model also opens new routes to novel therapeutic concepts related to recovery studies of epithelial barrier function. The innovative TEER device avoids inconsistent data acquisition and serves as quality control of cells after differentiation. It also could be used in the established set-up for medium throughput studies regarding dose–response curves of stimuli and possible recovery studies of epithelial barrier function. This has already been successful in different lung cell cultures but has never been transferred to hiPSC-derived cell models95,99,100,101.

Regarding future work, some topics should be addressed in more detail. Cryopreservation steps were implemented at day 6 and day 21 of differentiation. These two specific time points were selected, based on proliferation potential of cells and the determination of the germ layer (DE cells) and subsequent specification towards lung pattern (LPCs) already took place. To realize even higher cell numbers in frozen stocks to serve in drug discovery campaigns, further experiments concerning the expansion potential of DE cells should be performed. An optimization step would be to positively influence the viability of DE cells after cryopreservation through a spectrum of supplements102,103,104.The resulting even higher DE cell numbers and subsequent aliquoted frozen cell stocks could be beneficial to serve as a basis for regularly repeated drug discovery assay cycles. Additionally, the establishment of an expansion step for the LPCs through the administration of growth factors, as it was already implemented in neuronal progenitor cell differentiation protocols105, could further increase the yield of cells.

In addition, the here generated progenitor cells could be also used as a starting point for other complex differentiation processes, such as hepatocyte-like cells or thyroid cells, both in drug discovery and basic research. Another major advantage of using hiPSCs as a basis for the development of such a highly physiological in vitro model is, that it offers the possibility to generate different cell types out of the same cellular and genetic origin, enabling possible co-cultures and future personalized medicine approaches106. While there is substantial evidence for the relevance of various cytokines and growth factors in IPF, including TGF-β1, TNF-α and IL-1β, no single factor is known to simultaneously activate all IPF relevant pathways83,89. To better mimic the complexity of the pro-fibrotic milieu in vitro, this model can be used for further experiments and evaluations regarding the effects of a cytokine cocktail on the hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells45.

In summary, this work has established an hiPSC-derived and miniaturized AT2-like cell model system, which provides a unique opportunity to study IPF in vitro. The model is based on a monolayer-like differentiation protocol (without intermediate 3D steps). The combination of cryopreservation steps, the decoupling of the maturation in 96-Transwell cultures and a possible robotic integration enables a medium throughput approach towards pharmaceutical drug discovery. This technical innovation described in this study, opens new routes for target-focused and phenotypic drug discovery as well as basic research.

Methods

Differentiation of hiPSCs towards alveolar epithelial type 2 like cells

Human induced pluripotent stem cells maintenance

Either Cellartis Human hiPSC Cell Line 18 (ChiPSC18; cat. Y00305; Takara Bio Europe AB; Goteborg, Sweden) or Cellartis Human hiPSC Cell Line 22 (ChiPSC22; cat. Y00325; Takara Bio Europe AB; Goteborg, Sweden) was cultured and maintained according to manufacturer’s instructions in feeder free conditions. Briefly, cells were cultured on COAT-1 (cat. Y30012, Takara Bio Europe AB; Goteborg, Sweden) coated cell culture flasks in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C with a daily media change using freshly prepared Cellartis DEF-CS 500 complete medium (Cellartis DEF-CS 500 Basal Medium (cat. Y30011; Takara Bio Europe AB), supplemented with DEF-CS GF1 (diluted 1:333; cat. Y30016; Takara Bio Europe AB) and DEF-CS GF2 (diluted 1:1000; cat. Y30016; Takara Bio Europe AB)). DEF-CS GF3 (diluted 1:1000; cat. Y30016; Takara Bio Europe AB) was only added to Cellartis DEF-CS 500 complete medium when hiPSCs were thawed, passaged or cryopreserved and was not used for regular medium changes.

Prior to cell seeding, cell culture flasks were coated with 0.1 mL/cm2 of COAT-1 diluted 1:20 in 1× DPBS (+/+) (cat. 14040083, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for at least 30 min (min) at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cryopreserved hiPSCs were seeded at 1.6 × 105 cells per cm2 in Cellartis DEF-CS 500 complete medium and were cultured for at least 3 days until first passaging after thawing.

After reaching 80% confluence, cells were washed once with 1× DPBS (−/−) (cat. 14190144, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and detached using 40 µL/cm2 of 1× TrypLE Select Enzyme (cat. 12563-011; Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA). After an incubation time of up to 7 min at 37 °C, the flask was rinsed with 10 volumes of Cellartis DEF-CS 500 complete medium. Cells were replated at a density of 4 × 104 cells per cm2 (4 days culture) or at 5 × 104 cells per cm2 (3 days culture) in Cellartis DEF-CS 500 complete medium. For cryopreservation, the flask was rinsed with 5 volumes of Cellartis DEF-CS 500 complete medium after detaching. Cells were centrifuged at 200g for 5 min and resuspended at 6.5 × 106 cells per mL in STEM-CELLBANKER (cat. 11890; Amsbio; Abingdon, UK) for long-term storage.

Differentiation of hiPSC into alveolar epithelial type 2 like cells

Prior to the start of differentiation, the hiPSC were expanded and the DE formation was performed as follows40: Cell culture flasks were coated with Matrigel (cat. 354277; Corning, Corning, NY) diluted in 1× DPBS according to the manufacturer’s instructions for one hour at 37 °C. Subsequently, hiPSCs were detached as described for maintenance, using TrypLE Selected Enzyme. The single cell suspension was seeded at a density of 0.1 × 106 cells/cm2 in DE medium day 0 (composition see Table 1). The medium was changed daily until day 6 using the specific composition according to Table 1.

Table 1 DE medium composition during the phase of DE differentiation.

After 6 days, obtained DE cells were cryopreserved. Therefore, the cells were harvested by washing the cells once with 1× DPBS and by adding 1× TrypLE Select Enzyme. After an incubation time of 5 min at 37 °C, the flask was rinsed with RPMI1640 basal medium (cat. 11875-093; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cells were centrifuged at 200g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended to a final concentration of up to 6.5 × 106 cells per mL in cooled CryoStor CS10 (cat. 7959; Stemcell Technologies; Vancouver, Canada), supplemented with 10 µM Y-27632 dihydrochloride (ROCK inhibitor; cat. ab120129; Abcam; Cambridge, UK) for long-term storage.

Thawing of cryopreserved DE cells for subsequent differentiation into Anterior Foregut Endoderm (AFE) was performed in RPMI1640 basal medium. Cell suspension was collected, centrifuged at 200g for 5 min, resuspended in DE medium day 6, supplemented with 10 µM ROCK inhibitor, and plated on freshly coated Matrigel plates. Importantly, DE cells were seeded in the same density compared to the DE cells harvested prior to cryopreservation in Matrigel-coated cell culture ware.

The next day, the DE cells were differentiated into AFE cells by replacing the DE medium with AFE medium for 4 days (day 6–day 10, see Table 2). Differentiation was forged ahead towards ventralized AFE (vAFE) cells using the vAFE medium (see Table 3) from day 10 to 14. In order to push the vAFE cells into lung epithelial progenitor cells, the progenitor medium (see Table 4) was used from day 14 to day 21.

Table 2 AFE medium composition during the phase of AFE differentiation.
Table 3 vAFE medium composition during the phase of vAFE differentiation.
Table 4 Lung progenitor medium composition during the phase of lung progenitor differentiation.

After 21 days of differentiation, obtained lung progenitors were cryopreserved. Therefore, the cells were harvested by washing the cells once with 1× DPBS and by adding 80 µL/cm2 of 1× TrypLE Select Enzyme. After an incubation time of 10 min at 37 °C, the wells were rinsed with DMEM/F12 basal medium (cat. 10565018; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cells were centrifuged at 200g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in cooled CryoStor CS10, supplemented with 10 µM ROCK inhibitor for long-term storage.

Importantly, for optimal lung progenitor thawing, the cell number per vial was determined by the following equation:

$$X= \frac{\left(\frac{total \; live \; cell \; number}{Z}\right)*Y}{2}$$

with X [cells] = cells per vial for cryopreservation for thawing in Y; Y [cm2] = cell culture format for lung progenitor thawing and Z [cm2] = cell culture format of differentiation.

To generate alveolar epithelial cells, the cryopreserved lung progenitors were further cultured in 96-Transwell plates (cat. 3342; Corning; Corning, NY) in a submerged manner at day 21. Prior to cell seeding, filters of 96-Transwell plates were pre-coated with 50 µL of Matrigel for one hour at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Remaining coating solution was aspirated after the incubation time. Thawing of cryopreserved cells for subsequent alveolarization of lung progenitor cells was performed in lung progenitor medium (see Table 4). Cell suspension was collected, centrifuged at 200g for 5 min and resuspended in progenitor medium, supplemented with 10 µM ROCK inhibitor. Then, 1 × 105 cells/well in 50 µL/well were dispensed into the Matrigel-coated apical chambers of the 96-Transwell plates, containing 180 µL/well of alveolarization medium, supplemented with 10 µM ROCK inhibitor in the basal compartment. 24 h (h) after thawing (day 22), medium was replaced with freshly prepared progenitor medium (w/o ROCK inhibitor). At day 23, medium was changed to alveolarization medium (see Table 5), supplemented with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor, followed by a medium change on day 24 without ROCK inhibitor. The air–liquid interface condition was established at day 24 (3 days post-seeding) by the complete aspiration of the medium in the apical compartment, and cells were cultured until day 27 (stimulation of cells) or day 30.

Table 5 Alveolarization medium composition during the phase of final alveolar differentiation.

Measurement of epithelial barrier integrity

Trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) over the epithelial layer in the 96-Transwell plates was measured at the end of the differentiation process (day 27) in order to analyze the integrity of the epithelium. Measurement was conducted as described in detail in Bluhmki et al.73, using an automated 96-electrode device. Shortly, prior to the TEER measurements, cells were washed once with pre-warmed 1× DPBS to remove possibly produced mucus. To allow for the electrical measurement, 120 µL/well of pre-warmed medium was added subsequently to the apical chambers of the Transwell plate. Correction of raw data was accomplished by subtracting the electrical resistance as measured over an empty, cell-free insert. The final TEER values were obtained by multiplying with the insert area of the synthetic Transwell filter.

Immunofluorescence staining of markers for different cell stages during differentiation

Marker proteins of different cell stages during the differentiation process from hiPSCs towards AT2-like cells were visualized by immunolabeling and confocal microscopy. For this purpose, the cells were washed once with 1× DPBS and subsequently fixed with 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde solution (cat. 252549-500 ml; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO) for 15 min at room temperature. Cells cultured on filters of 96-Transwell plates were fixed by adding 50 µL/well of 4% PFA in the apical compartment and 180 µL/well in the basal compartment. After three washing steps with 1× DPBS, the cells were permeabilized with 0.3% (v/v) Triton X-100 (cat. T8787-100 ml; Sigma- Aldrich) in 5% (w/v) Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) (cat. A3059-100G; Sigma-Aldrich) in 1× DPBS for 60 min at room temperature. This permeabilization step was skipped for the cell membrane proteins EPCAM, CD184 (CXCR4) and CPM. Subsequently, the cells were washed three times with 1× DPBS, then incubated at 4 °C over night with the indicated primary antibodies (see Table 6 of antibodies and respective dilution factors) and Hoechst 33342 (cat. H3570; Thermo Fisher Scientific; diluted 1:5000) diluted in 1% (v/v) BSA in 1× DPBS. The next day, the cells were washed three times with 1× DPBS and then incubated in the dark for 2 h at room temperature with species-specific secondary Alexa Fluor antibodies (see Table 7), supplemented with 1% (v/v) BSA in 1× DPBS. Finally, the cells were washed three times with 1× DPBS. Membranes of Transwell plates were removed from the plastic support for ensuing mounting on a microscopic slide using the ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (cat. P36961, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Imaging of immunolabeled cells was performed using a LSM710 laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany).

Table 6 List of primary antibodies used in this study.
Table 7 List of secondary antibodies used in this study.

Semi-quantitative measurement of SFTPC+/ SFTPB+ areas in hiPSC-derived cultures

Immunofluorescence of fixed whole 96-Transwell inserts was performed as described above. Six randomly selected areas per insert were captured using a 20× Plan-Apochromat objective on a LSM 710 confocal microscope system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with the following settings: Alexa Fluor 488 channel, 5% laser power, master gain 600, acquisition speed 9. To account for unevenness in specimen surface and thickness, Z-stack imaging of 25 vertical stacks per area was applied and maximum intensity projection was performed using the ZEN 2012 Black Edition software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Image analysis was performed using the Fiji for ImageJ software (11). Each image was first converted to 8-bit format and then converted to binary at a threshold of 20–255. To avoid overlapping of structures, the watershed function was performed to accurately cut structures apart. Afterwards, nuclei/ surfactant positive areas were analyzed by using the 3D Objects counter tool in ImageJ. For Nuclei counting areas within 60 px were analyzed and summarized per image. Surfactant positive cells were counted based on > 100 px. For each analyzed Transwell insert, SFTPC positive cell counts were normalized to total cell number (based on nuclei counting) and the percentage of SFTPC positive cells in hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells at day 27 were calculated from the six selected areas.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry analysis of CPM and PAX8 in lung progenitor cells was performed on day 21 of differentiation. Cryopreserved lung progenitor cells were thawed on Matrigel-coated well plates according to the described thawing procedure in advance and stained for CPM, NKX2.1 and PAX8 expression the following day. Therefore, cells were detached from the culture by adding 80 µL/cm2 prewarmed 1× TrypLE Select Enzyme. After an incubation time of 10 min at 37 °C, the wells were rinsed with DMEM/F12 basal medium (cat. 10565018; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and centrifuged at 200g for 5 min. Cell pellet was resuspended in 1× DPBS and transferred to FACS tubes. All subsequent washing steps were performed by applying ice cold wash buffer consisting of 0.1% BSA in 1× DPBS. Cells were washed and tubes stained for PAX8 were additionally permeabilized in 80% MeOH for 5 min, followed by 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US) in wash buffer for 10 min. Blocking was performed in 10% goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US) in PBS for 10 min. Cells were washed and incubated in the respective antibody solution for 15 min on ice in the dark. Unstained controls were incubated in wash buffer, isotype control for CPM were incubated in Goat anti-mouse IgG2b Cross Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor647, (Ca. No. A21242, Thermo Fisher, 1:500 diluted in 100 µL/5 × 105 cells 1× DPBS, 1% BSA). Tubes stained for isotype matching PAX8 and NKX2.1 were incubated in 1 µg/mL Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated rabbit IgG Isotype Control (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Samples for CPM staining were incubated with primary antibody (anti-CPM, Cat.No. 014-27501, Wako 1:200 diluted in 100 µL/5 × 105 cells 1× DPBS, 1% BSA). Samples for PAX8 staining were incubated with primary antibody (anti-PAX8, Cat.No. ab53490, abcam 1:200 diluted in 100 µL/5 × 105 cells 1× DPBS, 1% BSA). Samples for NKX2.1 staining were incubated with primary antibody (anti-NKX2.1, Cat.No. WRAB1231, Seven Hills 1:500 diluted in 100 µL/5 × 105 cells 1× DPBS, 1% BSA). Next, cell pellet was washed twice with 5–10 volumes of cell staining buffer (1× DPBS, 1% BSA) and centrifuged at 200g for 3 min. Then, the secondary antibodies for CPM (Goat anti-mouse IgG2b Cross Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor488, Ca. No. A21242, Thermo Fisher, 1:500 diluted in 100 µL/ 5 × 105 cells 1× DPBS, 1% BSA), PAX8 and NKX2.1 (Goat anti-rabbit IgG Cross Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor488, Ca. No. A-11034, Thermo Fisher, 1:500 diluted in 100 µL/ 5 × 105 cells 1× DPBS, 1% BSA) were added and incubated for 15 min on ice, light protected. Again, cells were washed twice with 5–10 volumes cell staining buffer (1× DPBS, 1% BSA). Cells were passed through a 70 µm cell strainer cap to prevent blocking of FACS lines by cell aggregates. Samples were measured on BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, US) and analyzed using the FACSDiva (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, US) and the FlowJo (FlowJo LLC) software.

Transmission electron microscopy

The transmission electron microscopy images of hiPSC-derived AT2-like cells were generated following standard procedures. Shortly, 96-Transwell inserts were pre-fixed for 1 h with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (EM grade) and 2% Paraformaldehyde 0.1% cacodylate buffer solution. The PET membrane with pre-fixed cells was then carefully removed from the Transwell tray and washed with a 0.1% cacodylate buffer solution for 30 min. Subsequently, the samples were transferred into an EM-TP Tissue processor (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) for automated post-fixation, staining, dehydration and embedding. The samples underwent the following preparation steps: 20 min in 0.1% cacodylate buffer, 3 h in 2% Daltons osmiumtetroxide aq., 3 times 15 min in 0.1% cacodylate buffer solution, 15 min in 30% isopropanol, 30 min each in 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 100% isopropanol, and three times 1 h in 100% isopropanol. Following dehydration, sample infiltration with Epoxy resin was achieved as follows: 30 min in 50% isopropanol/ 50% EPON, 30 min in 33% isopropanol/ 66% EPON, 30 min in 20% isopropanol/ 80% EPON and 60 min in 100% EPON. Afterwards, the samples were then incubated twice for 6 h in 100% EPON and hardened at 60 °C for 24 h. Ultra-thin sections (50 nm) were prepared on an Ultracut UCT ultra-microtome (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) and imaged on a TEM 912AB (Zeiss, Oberkochen,Germany).

Gene expression profiles

For gene expression analysis, the Cells-to-CT 1-Step TaqMan Kit (cat. A25602; Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, cells were washed with 25 µL of cold 1× DPBS and lysed with 25 µL DNase/Lysis Solution (dilution 1:100). After 5 min, 2.5 µL of stop solution were added and incubated for 2 min. Generated lysates were either stored at − 20 °C or were directly used in subsequent RT-PCR experiments. Total human pulmonary alveolar epithelial cell (HPAEpiC) RNA lysate was purchased from BioTrend (cat. 3205-SC) and processed the same way as cell culture lysates.

For the RT-PCR, 1 µL of lysate was added to a final reaction volume of 10 µL containing 2.5 µL of TaqMan 1-Step qRT-PCR Mix, 0.5 µL of the respective TaqMan Gene Expression Assay, 20× (cat. 4351370; FAM Dye; Thermo Fisher Scientific), as listed in Table 8, and 6 µL of Nuclease-free water (cat. AM9922; Invitrogen). Gene expression levels of individual genes were normalized to the reference gene encoding the RNA Polymerase II Subunit A (POLR2A). Calculated 2(−Δct) values (expression relative to POLR2A) were plotted in analysis graphs. Fold expression levels were normalized to the reference samples (hiPSC or unstimulated cells) through the difference quotient of both 2(−Δct) values.

Table 8 List of TaqMan Gene Expression Assays used within this study.

Stimulation of cells

To investigate the physiological epithelial disruption of the generated alveolar epithelial type II like cells by a certain stimulus, the cells were stimulated with the indicated concentration of either TNF-α (cat. 210-TA-020; R&D Systems; Minneapolis, MN), IL-1β (cat. 201-LB-005/CF; R&D Systems) or TGFβ-1 (cat. 240-B; R&D Systems) at day 27 of LPC maturation. For that, both stimulants and negative vehicle controls were diluted in alveolarization medium and added to empty receiver plates (cat. 3382; Corning). Subsequently, 96-Transwell inserts from the cell plates were relocated to these receiver plates. Cellular stimulation was performed for 72 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2, with vehicle-treated cells serving as negative controls. After stimulation, the basal cell supernatants were collected and cells were washed on the apical side with 100 μL/well 1× DPBS to enable harvesting of apical supernatants. Cellular supernatants were frozen at − 20 °C until further analysis via time resolved fluorescence energy transfer (TR-FRET) for the expression of pro-fibrotic marker proteins, as described below.

TR-FRET measurement of pro-fibrotic marker proteins

TR-FRET was used to measure the pro-fibrotic markers Fibronectin (LANCE assay), MCP-1 and MMP-10 (HTRF assays) in cell culture supernatants after stimulation of the epithelial cells as described above. The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (CisBio and Perkin Elmer) in 384-well microplates (cat. 781075, Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) with a total assay volume of 15 µL/well. In short, for the HTRF assays, sandwich pairs of Eu-cryptate- and d2-conjugated anti-target antibodies (cat. 62HCCL2PEH and 62MMP9PEH; Cisbio; Codolet, France) were diluted with PPI Buffer (cat. 61DB9RDF; Cisbio) as indicated in the respective instruction guide. 5 µL/well of these antibody solutions were combined with 10 µL/well of the supernatants, which were fivefold diluted in alveolarization medium for the MCP-1 measurement. For the LANCE assay, 2 µL/well of 1:5 diluted samples were transferred in an assay plate. Subsequently, 8 µL/well of Ultra HiBlock Buffer (cat. TRF1011C; PerkinElmer; Waltham, MA) and 2.5 µL/well of Eu-labeled anti-Fibronectin antibody (cat. TRF1351C; PerkinElmer) were added. After an incubation time of 30 min, 2.5 µL/well of U-Light-labeled anti-Fibronectin antibody (cat. TRF1351C; PerkinElmer) were added.

Some wells of the microplates received Fibronectin (cat. 4305-FNB; R&D Systems), MCP-1 (cat. 300-04; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) or MMP-9 (cat. 910-MP-010; R&D Systems) standard solutions instead of supernatants for the determination of absolute concentrations of these three pro-fibrotic marker proteins. These recombinant proteins were used to guarantee that the actual measurements were in the dynamic area of the standard curve. Plates were incubated for 2 h (fibronectin) or for 24 h (MCP-1, MMP-10) at room temperature and were measured using an EnVision-Reader (excitation: 320 nm; emission: 615 nm and 665 nm) from PerkinElmer. HTRF and LANCE ratio values were calculated as follows: ratio = 10.000 × emission @665 nm/emission @615 nm.

Data analysis plan

Expression levels of different marker genes throughout the differentiation process presented in this work are depicted as mean with error bars representing the 95%CI (confidence interval) of at least three independent experiments. TEER measurements, one-step RT-PCR data of AT2-like cells and physiological stimulation data are shown as box blots with median and bars representing the minimum to maximum whiskers (median; [min, max]) of at least three independent experiments. Literature based TEER value of primary human alveolar lung cells was calculated based on published data listed in Supplementary Table S1, online. Statistical comparisons between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Uncorrected Dunn’s test. Furthermore, TM4SF1 one-step RT-PCR data were statistically compared to a hypothetical value of 0 using the one-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test. Semi-quantitative analysis of surfactant positive cells was assessed by a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. Generally, the nominal alpha level was set to 5% for statistical analysis in an exploratory manner and p-values of the corresponding F-statistics are presented (*p ˂ 0.05, **p ˂ 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p ˂ 0.0001). Data input, processing, management and analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software).

References

  1. Borchers, A. T., Chang, C., Keen, C. L. & Gershwin, M. E. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis—An epidemiological and pathological review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 40, 117–134 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardie, W. D. et al. Signaling pathways in the epithelial origins of pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Cycle 9, 2841–2848 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borensztajn, K., Crestani, B. & Kolb, M. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: From epithelial injury to biomarkers–insights from the bench side. Respir. Int. Rev. Thorac. Dis. 86, 441–452 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan, Z., Kui, Z. & Ping, Z. Reviews and prospectives of signaling pathway analysis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Autoimmun. Rev. 13, 1020–1025 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cottin, V. et al. Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: Knowns and unknowns. Eur. Respir. Rev. 28, 180100 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bitterman, P. Fibroblast-matrix cross-talk in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Cross-links at the crossroads. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. 58, 547–548 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wynn, T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J. Pathol. 214, 199–210 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujino, N. et al. Isolation of alveolar epithelial type II progenitor cells from adult human lungs. Lab. Investig. 91, 363–378 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fehrenbach, H. Alveolar epithelial type II cell: Defender of the alveolus revisited. Respir. Res. 2, 33 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barkauskas, C. E. et al. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J. Clin. Investig. 123, 3025–3036 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herriges, M. & Morrisey, E. E. Lung development: Orchestrating the generation and regeneration of a complex organ. Development 141, 502–513 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parimon, T., Yao, C., Stripp, B. R., Noble, P. W. & Chen, P. Alveolar epithelial type II cells as drivers of lung fibrosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2269 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, H. et al. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis is caused by elevated mechanical tension on alveolar stem cells. Cell 184, 845–846 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards, Y. S. Stretch stimulation: Its effects on alveolar type II cell function in the lung. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part Mol. Integr. Physiol. 129, 245–260 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, M. C. Alveolar type I cells: Molecular phenotype and development. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65, 669–695 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasper, M. & Barth, K. Potential contribution of alveolar epithelial type I cells to pulmonary fibrosis. Biosci. Rep. 37, BSR20171301 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whitsett, J. A., Wert, S. E. & Weaver, T. E. Diseases of pulmonary surfactant homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 10, 371–393 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bueno, M. et al. PINK1 deficiency impairs mitochondrial homeostasis and promotes lung fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 125, 521–538 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kolb, M., Bonella, F. & Wollin, L. Therapeutic targets in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Med. 131, 49–57 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foster, K. A., Oster, C. G., Mayer, M. M., Avery, M. L. & Audus, K. L. Characterization of the A549 cell line as a type II pulmonary epithelial cell model for drug metabolism. Exp. Cell Res. 243, 359–366 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lieber, M., Todaro, G., Smith, B., Szakal, A. & Nelson-Rees, W. A continuous tumor-cell line from a human lung carcinoma with properties of type II alveolar epithelial cells. Int. J. Cancer 17, 62–70 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heijink, I. H. et al. Characterisation of cell adhesion in airway epithelial cell types using electric cell-substrate impedance sensing. Eur. Respir. J. 35, 894–903 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper, J. R. et al. Long term culture of the A549 cancer cell line promotes multilamellar body formation and differentiation towards an alveolar type II pneumocyte phenotype. PLoS ONE 11, e0164438 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lorsch, J. R., Collins, F. S. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Fixing problems with cell lines. Science 346, 1452–1453 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan, C., Kumar, C., Bohl, S., Klingmueller, U. & Mann, M. Comparative proteomic phenotyping of cell lines and primary cells to assess preservation of cell type-specific functions. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 443–450 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Logan, C. Y. & Desai, T. J. Keeping it together: Pulmonary alveoli are maintained by a hierarchy of cellular programs. BioEssays 37, 1028–1037 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rogers, D. F., Donnelly, L. E., Witherden, I. R. & Tetley, T. D. Human airway inflammation, sampling techniques and analytical protocols. Methods Mol. Med. 56, 137–146 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scott, C. W., Peters, M. F. & Dragan, Y. P. Human induced pluripotent stem cells and their use in drug discovery for toxicity testing. Toxicol. Lett. 219, 49–58 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrisey, E. E. & Hogan, B. L. Preparing for the first breath: Genetic and cellular mechanisms in lung development. Dev. Cell 18, 8–23 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rackley, C. R. & Stripp, B. R. Building and maintaining the epithelium of the lung. J. Clin. Investig. 122, 2724–2730 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Banerjee, E. R. et al. Human embryonic stem cells differentiated to lung lineage-specific cells ameliorate pulmonary fibrosis in a xenograft transplant mouse model. PLoS ONE 7, e33165 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. D’Amour, K. A. et al. Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to definitive endoderm. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1534–1541 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang, J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of pluripotent stem cell-derived human lung alveolar type 2 cells elicits a rapid epithelial-intrinsic inflammatory response. Cell Stem Cell 27, 962-973.e7 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gotoh, S. et al. Generation of alveolar epithelial spheroids via isolated progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 394–403 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghaedi, M. et al. Human iPS cell-derived alveolar epithelium repopulates lung extracellular matrix. J. Clin. Investig. 123, 4950–4962 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McIntyre, B. A. S. et al. Expansive generation of functional airway epithelium from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Transl. Med. 3, 7–17 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Roszell, B. et al. Efficient derivation of alveolar type II cells from embryonic stem cells for in vivo application. Tissue Eng. Pt A 15, 3351–3365 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rippon, H. J. et al. Embryonic stem cells as a source of pulmonary epithelium in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 5, 717–722 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bluhmki, T. et al. Cell-based assays using iPSCs for drug development and testing. Methods Mol. Biol. 1994, 101–115 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Green, M. D. et al. Generation of anterior foregut endoderm from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 267–272 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Katsirntaki, K. et al. Bronchoalveolar sublineage specification of pluripotent stem cells: Effect of dexamethasone plus cAMP-elevating agents and keratinocyte growth factor. Tissue Eng. Pt A 21, 669–682 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dye, B. R. et al. In vitro generation of human pluripotent stem cell derived lung organoids. Elife 4, e05098 (2015).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McCauley, K. B. et al. Efficient derivation of functional human airway epithelium from pluripotent stem cells via temporal regulation of Wnt signaling. Cell Stem Cell 20, 844-857.e6 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schruf, E. et al. Recapitulating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis related alveolar epithelial dysfunction in a human iPSC-derived air-liquid interface model. FASEB J. 34, 7825–7846 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. van Riet, S. et al. In vitro modelling of alveolar repair at the air–liquid interface using alveolar epithelial cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 10, 5499 (2020).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Abo, K. M. et al. Human iPSC-derived alveolar and airway epithelial cells can be cultured at air-liquid interface and express SARS-CoV-2 host factors. Biorxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.03.132639 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Crane, A. M. et al. Targeted correction and restored function of the CFTR gene in cystic fibrosis induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 569–577 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Heilker, R., Lessel, U. & Bischoff, D. The power of combining phenotypic and target-focused drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 24, 526–532 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yamamoto, Y. et al. Long-term expansion of alveolar stem cells derived from human iPS cells in organoids. Nat. Methods 14, 1097–1106 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Asumda, F. Z. et al. Differentiation of hepatocyte-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells using small molecules. Differentiation 101, 16–24 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pan, T. et al. Robust expansion and functional maturation of human hepatoblasts by chemical strategy. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12, 151 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tasaka, S. et al. Cytokine profile of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Respirology 17, 814–820 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Barlo, N. P. et al. Genetic variability in the IL1RN gene and the balance between interleukin (IL)-1 receptor agonist and IL-1β in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol 166, 346–351 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. DePianto, D. J. et al. Heterogeneous gene expression signatures correspond to distinct lung pathologies and biomarkers of disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax 70, 48 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sokai, A. et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-10: A novel biomarker for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Res. 16, 120 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ojiaku, C. A., Yoo, E. J. & Panettieri, R. A. Jr. Transforming growth factor β1 function in airway remodeling and hyperresponsiveness. The missing link?. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. 56, 432–442 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kuhn, C. III. et al. An immunohistochemical study of architectural remodeling and connective tissue synthesis in pulmonary fibrosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 140, 1693–1703 (1989).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Redente, E. F. et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α accelerates the resolution of established pulmonary fibrosis in mice by targeting profibrotic lung macrophages. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. 50, 825–837 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Becker, S., Quay, J., Koren, H. S. & Haskill, J. S. Constitutive and stimulated MCP-1, GRO alpha, beta, and gamma expression in human airway epithelium and bronchoalveolar macrophages. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung C 266, L278–L286 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Heo, H.-R. et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar epithelial cells are alternatives for in vitro pulmotoxicity assessment. Sci. Rep. 9, 505 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hurley, K. et al. Reconstructed single-cell fate trajectories define lineage plasticity windows during differentiation of human PSC-derived distal lung progenitors. Cell Stem Cell 26, 593-608.e8 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Jacob, A. et al. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into functional lung alveolar epithelial cells. Cell Stem Cell 21, 472-488.e10 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Huang, S. X. L. et al. The in vitro generation of lung and airway progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 10, 413–425 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ghaedi, M., Niklason, L. E. & Williams, J. Development of lung epithelium from induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Transplant Rep. 2, 81–89 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Chen, Y.-W. et al. A three-dimensional model of human lung development and disease from pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 542–549 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Jacob, A. et al. Derivation of self-renewing lung alveolar epithelial type II cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 14, 3303–3332 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Corbett, J. L. & Duncan, S. A. iPSC-derived hepatocytes as a platform for disease modeling and drug discovery. Front. Med. 6, 265 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Engle, S. J., Blaha, L. & Kleiman, R. J. Best practices for translational disease modeling using human iPSC-derived neurons. Neuron 100, 783–797 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Cao, X., den Hil, F. E., Mummery, C. L. & Orlova, V. V. Generation and functional characterization of monocytes and macrophages derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 52, e108 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Peng, W. et al. Cell biology and translational medicine, volume 3, stem cells, bio-materials and tissue engineering. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2018_216 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kim, J., Koo, B.-K. & Knoblich, J. A. Human organoids: Model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 571–584 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bluhmki, T. et al. Development of a miniaturized 96-Transwell air–liquid interface human small airway epithelial model. Sci. Rep. 10, 13022 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wong, A. P. et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into mature airway epithelia expressing functional CFTR protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 876–882 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wong, A. P. et al. Efficient generation of functional CFTR-expressing airway epithelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 10, 363–381 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Firth, A. L. et al. Generation of multiciliated cells in functional airway epithelia from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, E1723–E1730 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Crapo, J. D. et al. Morphometric Characteristics of Cells in the Alveolar Region of Mammalian Lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 128(2 Pt 2), S42–S46 (1983).

  78. Snoeck, H. W. Modeling human lung development and disease using pluripotent stem cells. Development 142, 13–16 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Nikolić, M. Z., Sun, D. & Rawlins, E. L. Human lung development: Recent progress and new challenges. Development 145, dev163485 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Baritussio, A. G., Magoon, M. W., Goerke, J. & Clements, J. A. Precursor-product relationship between rabbit type II cell lamellar bodies and alveolar surface-active material surfactant turnover time. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Lipids Lipid Metab. 666, 382–393 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Zacharias, W. J. et al. Regeneration of the lung alveolus by an evolutionarily conserved epithelial progenitor. Nature 555, 251–255 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Stahlman, M. T. et al. Expression of ABCA3 in developing lung and other tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 55, 71–83 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Xu, X., Dai, H. & Wang, C. Epithelium-dependent profibrotic milieu in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Current status and future directions. Clin. Respir. J. 10, 133–141 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Agostini, C. & Gurrieri, C. Chemokine/cytokine cocktail in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 3, 357–363 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Lederer, D. J. & Martinez, F. J. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. New Engl. J. Med. 378, 1811–1823 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zank, D. C., Bueno, M., Mora, A. L. & Rojas, M. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Aging, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cellular bioenergetics. Front. Med. 5, 10 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Wei, Y. et al. Fibroblast-specific inhibition of TGF-β1 signaling attenuates lung and tumor fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 127, 3675–3688 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Malaviya, R., Laskin, J. D. & Laskin, D. L. Anti-TNFα therapy in inflammatory lung diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 180, 90–98 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Moore, B. B. et al. Animal models of fibrotic lung disease. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol 49, 130522202035005 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Gueders, M. M., Foidart, J.-M., Noel, A. & Cataldo, D. D. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs in the respiratory tract: Potential implications in asthma and other lung diseases. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 533, 133–144 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Deshmane, S. L., Kremlev, S., Amini, S. & Sawaya, B. E. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): An overview. J. Interface. Cytokine Res. 29, 313–326 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Propst, S. M., Denson, R., Rothstein, E., Estell, K. & Schwiebert, L. M. Proinflammatory and Th2-derived cytokines modulate CD40-mediated expression of inflammatory mediators in airway epithelia: Implications for the role of epithelial CD40 in airway inflammation. J. Immunol. 165, 2214–2221 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Schiller, M., Javelaud, D. & Mauviel, A. TGF-β-induced SMAD signaling and gene regulation: Consequences for extracellular matrix remodeling and wound healing. J. Dermatol. Sci. 35, 83–92 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Verrecchia, F. & Mauviel, A. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling through the Smad pathway: Role in extracellular matrix gene expression and regulation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 118, 211–215 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Sim, T. Y. et al. The protective effects of a synthetic geranyl acetophenone in a cellular model of TNF-α-induced pulmonary epithelial barrier dysfunction. Molecules 23, 1355 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Song, C. et al. Fluorofenidone attenuates pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis via inhibiting the activation of NALP3 inflammasome and IL-1β/IL-1R1/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med. 20, 2064–2077 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Muselet-Charlier, C. et al. Enhanced IL-1beta-induced IL-8 production in cystic fibrosis lung epithelial cells is dependent of both mitogen-activated protein kinases and NF-kappaB signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 357, 402–407 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Selman, M. & Pardo, A. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: An epithelial/fibroblastic cross-talk disorder. Respir. Res. 3, 3 (2001).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Overgaard, C. E. et al. The relative balance of GM-CSF and TGF-β1 regulates lung epithelial barrier function. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung C 308, L1212–L1223 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Inman, G. J. et al. SB-431542 is a potent and specific inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β superfamily type I activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) receptors ALK4, ALK5, and ALK7. Mol. Pharmacol. 62, 65–74 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Swinney, D. C. et al. A small molecule ubiquitination inhibitor blocks NF-κB-dependent cytokine expression in cells and rats. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 23573–23581 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Xu, X. et al. Enhancement of cell recovery for dissociated human embryonic stem cells after cryopreservation. Biotechnol. Prog. 26, 781–788 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Emre, N. et al. The ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 improves recovery of human embryonic stem cells after fluorescence-activated cell sorting with multiple cell surface markers. PLoS ONE 5, e12148 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Xu, X. et al. The roles of apoptotic pathways in the low recovery rate after cryopreservation of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 26, 827–837 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Traub, S., Stahl, H., Rosenbrock, H., Simon, E. & Heilker, R. Upscaling of hiPS cell-derived neurons for high-throughput screening. Slas Discov. 22, 274–286 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Orlova, V. V. et al. Generation, expansion and functional analysis of endothelial cells and pericytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1514–1531 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG. We are grateful to Michael Traub, Doris Goronski, Nadine Held, Achim Lietz, Antonia Thomitzek, Nadine Rehm, Jenny Morath, Dagmar Rädel, Anja Krämer, Ann-Kathrin Mattes, Dr. Florian Colbatzky, Dr. Tanja Waldmann, Dr. Christina Haenisch, Dr. Matthias Gutekunst and Dr. Salome Mack, Dr. Amaury Fernandez, Dr. Daniel Bischoff for technical and scientific support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.B., S.T., R.H., J.G., M.L., F.G. conceived the project; T.B., S.T., A.K.M., E.S., J.G. R.H., designed research; T.B., S.T., A.K.M., S.B., M.T.B., E.S., performed research; T.B., S.T., A.K.M., S.B., analyzed data; T.B., S.B., R.H., wrote the paper. T.B., R.H. prepared the figures; all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Bluhmki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Authors were either employees of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Trenzyme GmbH or University of Konstanz at the time this study was performed. The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bluhmki, T., Traub, S., Müller, AK. et al. Functional human iPSC-derived alveolar-like cells cultured in a miniaturized 96‑Transwell air–liquid interface model. Sci Rep 11, 17028 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96565-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96565-4

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing