Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Gα15 in early onset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract

The GNA15 gene is ectopically expressed in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer cells. The encoded Gα15 protein can promiscuously redirect GPCR signaling toward pathways with oncogenic potential. We sought to describe the distribution of GNA15 in adenocarcinoma from human pancreatic specimens and to analyze the mechanism driving abnormal expression and the consequences on signaling and clinical follow-up. We detected GNA15 expression in pre-neoplastic pancreatic lesions and throughout progression. The analysis of biological data sets, primary and xenografted human tumor samples, and clinical follow-up shows that elevated expression is associated with poor prognosis for GNA15, but not any other GNA gene. Demethylation of the 5′ GNA15 promoter region was associated with ectopic expression of Gα15 in pancreatic neoplastic cells, but not in adjacent dysplastic or non-transformed tissue. Down-modulation of Gα15 by shRNA or CRISPR/Cas9 affected oncogenic signaling, and reduced adenocarcimoma cell motility and invasiveness. We conclude that de novo expression of wild-type GNA15 characterizes transformed pancreatic cells. The methylation pattern of GNA15 changes in preneoplastic lesions coincident with the release a transcriptional blockade that allows ectopic expression to persist throughout PDAC progression. Elevated GNA15 mRNA correlates with poor prognosis. In addition, ectopic Gα15 signaling provides an unprecedented mechanism in the early steps of pancreas carcinogenesis distinct from classical G protein oncogenic mutations described previously in GNAS and GNAQ/GNA11.

Introduction

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing as the disease remains a major challenge in oncology. Risk factors, such as chronic inflammation, stimulate oncogenic transformation over many years prior to presentation of symptoms. Deciphering the etiology of PDAC initiation and progression could identify early stage markers and treatment options crucial to extending survival.

Over 60 G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are expressed in PDAC and a third of these are orphan receptors without known ligands1. Their functions in PDAC are poorly characterized. GPCR signaling is transduced by heterotrimeric Gαβγ proteins. Four classes of Gα proteins, Gs, Gi, Gq, and G12, regulate distinct signaling pathways2. The large G proteins and small G proteins, such as Ras, share related structure and regulation of activity by a cycle of GTP binding and hydrolysis. Whole-exome and genome sequencing confirmed the importance of heterotrimeric G proteins in oncogenic signaling pathways1. The best-described molecular mechanism is a collection of amino acid substitutions in the GTP binding site that inhibits GTP hydrolysis analogous to activating mutations in KRAS. Driver mutations in GNAS, the gene encoding Gαs that activates adenylyl cyclase, are associated with cystic lesions termed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), the second most frequent precursor of PDAC3 after pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). The Gq class activates PLCβ and downstream calcium signaling. Activating mutations in the two ubiquitously expressed Gq class proteins, Gαq and Gα11, are the most common driver mutations in uveal melanoma1. Constitutive Gα activation hyperstimulates persistent downstream signaling, and this may explain why driver mutations in Gα family members are not tolerated in most cellular contexts but are advantageous in only a few well-defined neoplasia.

Gα15 is the most divergent Gα protein among human orthologs2. It promiscuously couples most GPCRs, thus redirecting signaling from other Gα pathways to activate calcium signaling4,5. Furthermore, once activated, Gα15 is poorly constrained by β-arrestin and RGS desensitization6,7. Possibly related to these signaling peculiarities, Gα15 expression is highly restricted, primarily to hematopoietic cells8. Gα15 may have evolved by providing a sensitive and potent signaling node in host cells dedicated to respond to a rapidly changing microenvironment.

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), de Jonge et al. found that higher GNA15 expression in the stem-cell enriched (CD34+) fraction was associated with poorer overall patient survival9. We found Gα15 was expressed in human PDAC biopsies, even after malignant cells were selectively expanded in nude mice10. In addition, Gα15 supported the growth of PDAC cell lines in suspension and nutrient deprivation10. Gα15 effectors include several therapeutic targets in clinical trials for PDAC, such as Ras, PI3K, PKCs4 and p5311. Ectopic Gα15 could hijack diverse GPCRs to activation of Ca2+ signaling and bypass β-arrestin dependent desensitization, obviating the need for classical activating mutations to sustain aberrant activity. Here we show that Gα15 de novo expression appears in the early phases of pancreas carcinogenesis, is highly specific of transformed cells, affects cellular signaling and migratory properties, and has prognostic implications for PDAC.

Methods

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The collection and use of human samples were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and approved by the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Trust of Verona (LCT001 and following amendments). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

In situ hybridization (ISH)

RNAscope assay was performed on FFPE biopsies using RNAscope 2.5 HD Reagent Kit [RED 322,360, Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD), Hayward, CA] according to manufacturer instructions (https://acdbio.com). Briefly, 5 µm tissue sections were baked 1 h at 60 °C and deparaffinized with xylene and 100% ethanol. After 10 min incubation with H2O2 solution, target retrieval was performed using the Brown FS3000 food steamer for 30 min if tissue or 15 min if cells. Slices were dehydrated and incubated with protease plus at 40 °C for 15 min. The slides were then hybridized at 40 °C for 2 h with a probe for human Hs-GNA15 validated with cell lines previously characterized for GNA15 expression by RT-PCR and western blot (Supp. Fig. S1)10 utilizing as a positive control probe Hs-UBC and as a negative control probe DapB. After hybridizations, slides were subjected to signal amplification using HD 2.5 detection kit, and hybridization signal was detected using a mixture of Fast-RED solutions A and B (1:60). Red dots reveal local amplification of the target mRNA. After counterstaining with Gill's hematoxylin, slides were dried in a 60 °C dry oven for 15 min and mounted with EcoMount. EM897L Biocare Medical, LLC). Sections were imaged and analyzed. Each sample was scored measuring the density of the dots in lesion area, values were confirmed comparing to a score (0 to 4) in blind by a pathologist.

Gα15 downmodulation

Reagents for replication-deficient lentivirus were from Sigma-Aldrich. Lentiviral particles were produced by transient transfection of 3 µg of pLKO_IPTG1xLacO (SHGLY-NM) containing previously validated shRNA sequences5 and 3 µl of packaging mix (SHP001) into HEK293T cells in a 35 mm dish with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (11,668,019, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Viral supernatants were collected at 48 h, passed through a 0.2 μm filter and added to PT45 cells in the presence of 4 μg/mL hexadimethrine bromide (H9268) for 6 h followed by puromycin (P9620) selection 48 h post-infection.

Gα15 knockout

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated GNA15 knockout was performed as previously described7. Briefly, Lipofectamine 2000 was used to transfect HEK293T cells, as above, with pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro(PX459)V2.0 (Addgene #62988) containing guides designed in CHOPCHOP and CRISPR design software and targeting GNA15 gene in the first (AGGATGAGAAGGCCGCCGCCCGG and CGGCCTTCTATCCTCCGTCAGG), and second (GTGCTCTTCCCGCTCTCGCCTGG) exons. Isolation of clonal cell lines was achieved with puromycin selection the third day after transfection followed by cloning into 96-well plates. DNA was isolated from single clones and 3 independent clones were selected for displaying premature stop codons in GNA15 sequence.

Availability of data

  1. (1)

    GTEx Portal (https://gtexportal.org/home/gene/GNA15; January 2019), to study GNA15 mRNA expression in normal human tissues.

  2. (2)

    Provisional dataset for Pancreatic Cancer (PAAD, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/projects/TCGA-PAAD) of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga) queried through the cBioPortal12 (https://www.cbioportal.org/), to study GNA15 mRNA expression in affected human tissues.

  3. (3)

    Broad Institute Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE13, https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle), to study GNA15 mRNA expression, DNA methylation and their correlation in human cancer cell lines.

  4. (4)

    Data from three mRNA microarrays studies, to study GNA15 gene expression in PDAC and healthy tissue14,15,16.

  5. (5)

    The Blueprint Epigenome Program (http://www.blueprint-epigenome.eu/), to study the correlation between GNA15 mRNA expression levels and methylation at single base level in leukemic cells lineages. Gα protein mutation was analyzed in the GRCh38 Cosmic database v8817 on February 2019. Those who carried out the original analysis and collection of the data bear no responsibility for the further analysis or interpretation of it.

  6. (6)

    TCGA dataset LAML by MEXPRESS supported by the Common Fund of the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and by NCI, NHGRI, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH.

Statistical analysis

The statistical measurement values, when indicated, were presented as means ± SEM.

The statistical significance of differences in the measured mean frequencies between two experimental groups was calculated using the Student two-tailed t-test.

Experiments involving western blot and RT-PCR techniques were repeated n times as defined in the figure legends. Survival percentages were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test.

Additional methods are described as supplementary information.

Results

Gα15 de novo expression distinguishes transformed pancreas from other cancers

In mice8 and humans4, normal tissues predominately express GNA15 in hematopoietic cells and skin progenitor cells. Systemic data extracted from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project confirms these findings and includes two additional epithelia, esophagus mucosa and vagina (Supp. Fig. S2). By contrast, GNA15 expression is lowest in pancreas and the entire gastrointestinal tract below the gastroesophageal junction. Characterization of GNA15 expression in paired normal tissue and tumor samples revealed exocrine pancreas had among the highest differential induction of GNA15 in cancer (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure1

GNA15 differential expression in normal tissue and cancer. Median gene expression across several tumor samples and paired normal tissues utilizing GEPIA2.

Biomarker screens of paired samples of PDAC tumor versus adjacent healthy tissue shows GNA15 is preferentially expressed in tumors of nearly all PDAC patients (Supp. Fig. S3)14,15,16,18.

Analysis of over a thousand cancer cell lines from the cancer cell encyclopedia (Fig. 2, open bars) corroborated our initial finding10. Pancreas, bile duct, and to a lesser extent, lung cancer cells are distinct among non-hematopoeitic lineages for ectopic GNA15 expression at high levels similar to leukemia.

Figure 2
figure2

GNA15 expression and methylation in cancer cell lines. GNA15 mRNA expression (white bar showing RNAseq on the left axis) and DNA methylation (black bars, showing reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) on the right axis) according to data from the Cancer Cell Encyclopedia. Among one thousand cancer cell lines, pancreas and biliary tract are the only normal tissues that do not express GNA15 but the derived cancer cell lines had high GNA15 expression levels, comparable to leukemia and upper aero-digestive tract. Box plots are shown as median and 25th and 75th percentiles. ALL acute lymphocytic leukemia, CML chronic myelocytic leukemia, AML acute myelocytic leukemia, DLBCL diffuse large B cell lymphoma, BNHL B cells non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The number below to the lineage name indicates how many cell lines are in the lineage.

GNA15 promoter demethylation correlates with Gα15 expression

Methylation levels of representative CpGs throughout the GNA15 gene correlated with its expression in hematopoietic cell types (Blueprint Epigenome Program, supp. Fig. S4A), acute myeloid leukemia (TCGA-LAML database, supp. Fig. S4B), PDAC derived cell lines (GTEx, Fig. 2) and TCGA-PAAD tumor samples (Supp. Fig. S4C). In particular, high GNA15 mRNA expression corresponds to 7 CpGs hypomethylated near the promoter, and 4 CpGs hypermethylated at the 3′-end of GNA15 (Supp. Fig. S4C with 9 of 11 CpGs with p < 0.001). In order to establish a direct correlation between differential GNA15 methylation and transformation we sought to apply targeted bisulfite sequencing to genomic DNA derived from PDAC tumors, xenografts and adjacent apparently normal tissue. Mapping single CpGs confirmed the correlation between this methylation pattern and GNA15 expression (Fig. 3A). Moreover, the same methylation pattern was observed in primary and xenograft tumors. A comparison to apparently normal tissue shows that methylation of exon 1 and intron 1 is reduced in primary tumors and xenograft samples. Demethylation of the promoter is more evident in the xenografted tumors than in the primary tumor. The effect could be explained by an increased proportion of cancer cells relatively to fibroblast in transplanted xenografts as a consequence of the loss of the large fibroblasts component when cancer cells are transplanted into the hosting tissue of the animal.

Figure 3
figure3

Demethylation, ectopic GNA15 expression and survival. (A) GNA15 gene methylation was mapped at single CpG in apparently normal tissue, and xenografted tumors, matched with primary tumors when available (gray bars represent standard deviation. n = 4 for normal tissues and primary tumors and n = 22 for xenografts). (B) Spearman’s correlation between Gα subunits expression levels and survival according to the TCGA-PAAD cohort (n = 59 samples). The isotypes associated to a significant p value (< 0.05) are in bold. No apparent correlation with tumor stages was found for any Gα gene. (C) The methylation level reported in the TCGA-PAAD court plotted against survival data distinguishing the NET and the PDAC patients further subdivided based on low (bottom 30%) vs high (top 30%) GNA15 expression levels. (D) GNA15 high expression is associated with poor survival. Kaplan survival curve in patients in the cytology group. All 20 patients were divided in two groups based on GNA15 expression (log RNA Seq V2 RSEM, log-rank test; z = 2.67, p = 0.00754).

By contrast, exon 7 is highly methylated at its 5′-end in all samples (normal, primary tumor, and xenograft) while its 3′-end is equally hypermethylated in primary and xenograft tumors compared to normal pancreas.

GNA15 ectopic expression and prognosis

Heterotrimeric G proteins are emerging key-players in pancreatic and other neoplasia1,3. Driver mutations are easily recognized in the α subunit of small and heterotrimeric G proteins because amino acid substitutions are strictly localized to residues that catalyze GTP hydrolysis (see “Introduction” section). However, a search of the cosmic database produced no evidence for driver mutations in GNA15 or other Gq class members in PDAC (Supp. Table 1). We suggest that ectopic expression of wild-type Gα15 is sufficient to divert GPCR signaling towards pancreatic oncogenisis4,10 because wild-type Gα15 promiscuously and persistently6 couples most GPCRs and may activate Kras19, PKD110 and other oncogenic drivers in PDAC progression.

The Cancer Genome Atlas program (TCGA) shows for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) that among 16 Gα genes, only elevated expression of GNA15 was associated with worse prognosis (Fig. 3B). By contrast, elevated expression of Gα subunit genes GNAL, GNAO1, and GNA14 were correlated with increased survival after diagnosis. These associations are likely related to the abnormal GNA15 expression in PDAC cancer cells, whereas GNAL, GNAO1, and GNA14 are preferentially expressed in normal pancreas, which is progressively lost as transformed tissue prevails.

The PAAD dataset includes patients with PDAC and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs20). NETs are produced in the pancreas by an oncogenic pathway distinct from PDAC. Transcriptome analysis clearly shows GNA15 expression and methylation levels are reciprocally inverse in NET and PDAC (Supp. Fig. S5A). NETs do not appreciably express GNA15 and have a more favorable prognosis. Plotting patient’s overall survival vs. GNA15 methylation segregates NET from PDAC and, to a lesser extent, PDAC with low compared to high GNA15 expression (Fig. 3C) yet retaining prognostic indications (Fig. 3D).

Elevated GNA15 in PDAC was highly correlated with loss of SMAD4 expression (Pearson: − 0.47, p = 9.2 e−10) and S100A2 overexpression (Pearson: 0.46, p = 2.0 e−9). SMAD4 and S100A2 are considered the most promising prognostic indications based on single genetic markers21. Interestingly, S100A2 and GNA15 prognostic values are significant in a subset of PAAD patients initially diagnosed by cytology (e.g. peritoneal or pleural fluid, Supp. Fig. S6A–C) in samples from late stage disease that may be enriched in transformed cells. Altogether, these findings strongly suggest that distinctive epigenetic changes drive ectopic expression of Gα15 protein in PDAC and pancreas is the primary example within the entire organism where up-regulation of GNA15 transcription marks oncogenic transformation. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the precise identity of neoplastic cells that ectopically express GNA15 in PDAC.

Gα15 ectopic expression in pancreas marks transformed cells

We analyzed GNA15 mRNA expression by ISH among over 30 patients at the Verona Pancreas Center to determine in which cell types and stage of PDAC progression GNA15 is ectopically expressed. Apparently healthy pancreatic tissue adjacent to transformed lesions was negative (Supp. Fig. S7A–C), consistent with prior studies10. Furthermore, GNA15 was not induced in chronic pancreatitis nor in the fibrotic component or ductular structures in the desmoplastic reaction surrounding invasive lesions express GNA15 (Supp. Fig. S8A). Infiltrating lymphocytes occasionally expressed GNA15, possibly depending on the activation state and the presence of plasma cells (Supp. Fig. S8B red dots identify GNA15 mRNA ISH). Accordingly, the PAAD dataset shows no significant correlation between GNA15 expression and lymphocyte infiltration stained by eosin hematoxylin or IHC (Supp. Fig. S4C). Neoplastic cells were consistently positive. Of note, PanIN (Fig. 4A) and IPMN (Fig. 4B) preneoplastic lesions expressed GNA15 mRNA similar to virtually all lesions (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4
figure4

de novo GNA15 gene expression in PDAC. (A–C) Human pancreas biopsies were analyzed by eosin hematoxylin (upper panels) or ISH (middle and lower panels) developed in Fast-RED (two examples are indicated by the red arrows) utilizing a GNA15 specific probe in addition to positive and negative controls (Supp. Fig. S1). Preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions were evidently positive. A PanIN1 lesion is shown in panel A (left micrograph), and a PanIN2 (right micrograph). A superficial fragment of an IPMN is shown in panel B, the yellow arrows indicate papillary structures in the non invasive region. Panel C shows two examples of PDAC. (D) The expression level of GNA15 was quantified by ISH. In the abscissa each number corresponds to a patient, and each circle represents the average value (dot density by ISH) of all lesions in a FFPE section, one circle per section, 2–4 sections per patient, 37 total patients. Red or green dots were used alternatively to differentiate each patient. (E) GNA15 relative expression in the primary tumor was quantified by ISH and compared in patients that relapsed versus patients that remained disease free one year after pancreas resection. Box plots are shown as median and 25th and 75th percentiles: points are displayed as outliers if they are above or below the 1.5 times the interquartile range. A T-test was applied to compare the two groups, p < 0.05. (F) Tumor tissue fragments of resected pancreata were split in two parts. Half was analyzed by ISH to select for variable GNA15 expression levels going from absent (apparently healthy tissue from NET patients) to high (PDAC with abundant positive lesions). The other half of the fragment was analyzed by TaqMan RT-PCR measuring GNA15 and GNA14 expression levels.

GNA15 mRNA expression varied between patients but was relatively consistent within different specimens obtained from the same organ thus characterizing each patient (Fig. 4D). Frozen tissue samples adjacent to areas that produced FPPE sections with numerous neoplastic lesions and expressing high levels of GNA15 mRNA were analyzed by western blot and compared to frozen samples adjacent to areas displaying apparently healthy tissue. A good correspondence was found between mRNA and protein expression (Supp. Fig. S9).

Follow-up data available for 20 PDAC patients (Supp. Table 2) show that one year after surgery half of the patients had relapsed. The average relative GNA15 expression level was 0.37 in relapsed patients, compared to 0.16 of those that remained disease free (Fig. 4E), indicating that GNA15 expression in transformed pancreas may offer indications on patient prognosis. Higher GNA15 expression consistently predicted poorer survival (Supp. Fig. S10A), while no significant correlation was observed with Ca19.9 levels (Supp. Fig. S10B) or with other clinical parameters (Supp. Table 3), given the caveat of relatively few cases.

An inverse correlation in the PAAD dataset between the expression levels of GNA15 and its closest homolog, GNA14 (Spearman: − 0.26, p = 5.780e−4), was verified by RT-PCR on human frozen samples selected to include negative, intermediate and highly positive specimens on the basis of ISH analysis of adjacent fragments (Fig. 4F). Distinct samples from the same organ clustered together and thus distinguished each patient. This result suggests that the appearance of GNA15, but none of the other 15 GNA genes, could indicate progressive invasion into normal pancreas by PDAC (Supp. Fig. S10C).

We conclude that GNA15 mRNA and protein expression in the pancreas is restricted to transformed cells, with minor contribution from infiltrating lymphocytes, occurs in the initial phases of PDAC progression (PanIN and IPMN), and may provide information about the development of the disease.

Functional significance of Gα15 signaling

In order to investigate the impact of Gα15 signaling, we further investigated PT45 cells10,22 as an experimental model system. Specific inhibition was achieved by two different approaches in PT45 PDAC cells. Complete knock out of GNA15 gene was obtained by CRISPR/Cas9 editing. In parallel, validated shRNA sequences10 were engineered under the control of an IPTG inducible promoter and transduced in order to downmodulate GNA15 expression in response to treatment (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5
figure5

Functional consequences of Gα15 signaling. (A) In PT45 cells Gα15 was down-modulated by IPTG inducible shRNA expression or knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 in all alleles of 3 independent clones, as confirmed by DNA sequencing. Protein down-modulation was confirmed by immunoblot as shown and quantified as 70% ± 9% of control (n = 4). (B) The impact of preventing Gα15 expression was evaluated by immunoblot analysis of phospho-amino acids diagnostic of the activation state of PKD1 (n = 10). (C) The impact of down-modulating Gα15 expression was evaluated as in B (n = 10). (D) The impact of preventing Gα15 expression in response to IGF was evaluated by immunoblot analysis of phospho-amino acids diagnostic of the activation state of AKT (n = 6). (E) The impact of down-modulating Gα15 expression in response to 100 ng/ml IGF and 100 nM insulin was evaluated as in D (n = 8). (F) PT45 cell motility assessed in scratch assays. Representative images are shown in Supp. Fig. S12. (G) PT45 cell invasion of collagen-coated membranes. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Direct comparison between cells with GNA15 downmodulated and controls was performed applying t-test and *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; *** P < 0.0005. Extended blots are presented in Supp. Fig. S13.

We analyzed the activation state of selected effector kinases potentially downstream Gα15 signaling4 including protein kinase D1 (PKD1/PKCµ/PRKD1), a kinase involved in PDAC and downstream KRas-NF-κB signaling23. Upon GNA15 depletion, the basal phosphorylation level of Ser738/Ser742 in the autoinhibitory domain of PKD1 was reduced. Yet, the phosphorylation of the regulatory Ser910 was not affected (Fig. 5B,C).

In intestinal epithelial cells, PKD1 mediates a negative feedback on the responsiveness of PI3K/AKT to extracellular stimuli24 and reprogramming towards stemness was observed in response to AKT downregulation25. Depletion of Gα15 expression up-regulated AKT response to Insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). A similar increase of phosphorylation was observed for two different activation sites, Thr308 and Ser473, and by both approaches used to prevent Gα15 expression (Fig. 5D,E). The same effect on AKT after Gα15 depletion was obtained upon insulin stimulation (Fig. 5E). The activation state of ERK1/2, p38 and GSK remained substantially unaffected by Gα15 signaling under these conditions (Supp. Fig. S11). We conclude that Gα15 produces tonic activation of Ca2+ regulated PKD1 and affects AKT response to IGF receptor activation.

The contribution of Gα15 signaling in cell motility

GPCRs ligands such as chemokines direct cell migration. We analyzed the impact of Gα15 signaling on the migratory properties of PT45 cells. Wound healing assays were sought to compare wild type vs. GNA15 CRISPR/Cas9 knock out cells and untreated vs. shRNA down-modulated cells. Cell motility was reduced in both circumstances (Fig. 5F). The role of Gα15 in PT45 cell invasion was assayed using collagen-coated membranes (Fig. 5G). IPTG-induced shRNA expression knocked down GNA15 expression and reduced cell invasion. These results support the possibility that Gα15 plays a role in the diffusion of transformed cells.

Discussion

De novo ectopic GNA15 expression

Somatic mutations are classically thought to drive cancer. Mutations that activate Gα subunits genes are oncogenic in a restricted set of neoplasias, such as Gαq/11-driven melanomas1 and Gαs-driven IPMNs in PDAC3. Unlike GNAS, no driver mutations are described for Gq-class genes in the pancreas (Supp. Table 1). Nevertheless, other mechanisms can activate oncogenic Gα signaling that more closely mimic signaling produced by physiological stimuli. For instance, down-regulation of the GPCR kinases (GRK) and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) were recently associated with PDAC development26,27, implying that oncogenic GPCR signaling does not necessarily directly entail mutations.

We found ectopic expression of GNA15 is typical of PDAC and occurs in transforming cells, rather than being contributed by stromal cells10; Fig. 4A–C, Supp. Fig S4,7,8). In prior biomarker screens of PDAC tumor tissue vs normal paired samples, GNA15 was repeatedly identified among candidate genes (Supp. Figure 3) but was not further investigated, possibly because of relatively low expression restricted to a limited fraction of cancer cells within the tumor14,15,16,18. Among the four classes of heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunits2, Gα15 is unique in that it promiscuously redirects nearly all GPCRs to PLCβ activation and downstream calcium signaling4. In addition, Gα15 signaling is poorly controlled by β-arrestin and RGS dependent desensitization6,7. Ectopic expression of wild-type Gα15 in pancreas could subvert regulatory controls and could participate to influence the activity of downstream effectors, including PKC, PKD1, Src, PI3K, NF-kB, STAT and others that feed into Ras-MAPK activation and are relevant to PDAC4,28.

This intermediate step of ectopic Ga15 expression in PDAC initiation appears to be driven by altered DNA methylation of the GNA15 gene. In transformed cells, hypomethylation shifts to the 5′ promoter region, apparently releasing a transcriptional blockade throughout PDAC progression.

Recently, the genomic region that includes GNA15 was found to be differentially methylated by comparing EPCAM + / CD45- cells isolated from PDAC and normal pancreas29. In nearly pure PDAC and normal pancreatic cells, cytosine methylation in the 5′ side of the first intron occurred in the range of a beta value of 0.05–0.2 in PDAC and 0.6–0.8 in the normal pancreas. The two values are similar to those we found in xenografts and normal pancreas for the same DNA region. In addition, our data suggest that the beta value of 0.3–0.5 we observed in PDAC tissues, intermediate to those of xenografts and normal pancreas, is influenced by a variable cellularity of cancer cells. In the study by Espinet et al.29, an inverse correlation of approximately r = − 0.6 and a P value below 0.05 was also reported between the methylation of the first intron and the mRNA level, suggesting that the first intron includes regulatory sequences under epigenetic control.

The ectopic expression of Gα15 is unlikely a secondary effect of the poor vascularization that characterizes PDAC. In fact, areas affected by pancreatitis do not express GNA15 despite the typical dysplastic reaction with massive deposition of stroma and the formation of small ducts18 (Supp. Fig. S7H,I). ISH of patient samples confirmed the data we obtained with xenografted mice showing that transformed cells express GNA15 mRNA. In addition, tumor stroma was negative, with the exception of occasional infiltrated lymphocytes. Perhaps only activated lymphocytes express GNA15, as in most cases infiltrating lymphocytes are negative and there is no correlation reported in the TCGA-PAAD database.

In primary samples from human patients, GNA15 mRNA expression varied from one patient to another, yet remained alike within multiple lesions collected from the same pancreas (Fig. 4E). GNA15 expression invariably revealed the appearance of neoplastic cells. GNA15 is first expressed in PanIN and IPMN, and at later stages of PDAC, elevated GNA15 expression is correlated with poor survival. Altogether, our results suggest that ectopic expression of Gα15 may represent a marker of PDAC from early phases in tumor etiology. The cause-effect relationship remains to be understood.

Considering GNA15 expression in PDAC is elevated above a negative background in the pancreas, the stringent correlation in expression linking GNA15 with more established markers such as SMAD4 and S100A2 warrants additional research exploring clinical applications. S100A2 was recognized as a prognostic marker in a large study showing the benefit of adjuvant therapy30. If Gα15 contributes to PDAC progression during asymptomatic phases, it is crucial to understand its role as transformed cells begin to engulf the pancreas and engraft outside the primary organ. Earlier diagnostic markers are desperately needed, as metastases render surgery palliative, rather than curative, even in the 20% of patients eligible for resection.

The effects of ectopic GNA15 signaling

Gα15 ectopic expression in the pancreas could activate some of the most relevant drivers of PDAC such as oncogenic KRAS via the scaffold protein tetratricopeptide repeat 1 (TPR131) and PKD1 via nPKC32. Gα15 induces PLCβ to cleave PIP2 producing the second messengers DAG and IP3 that synergistically activate protein kinase C (PKC)4. nPKCs phosphorylate Ser738/Ser742 of the PKD1 activation domain. Reduced phosphorylation at these positions upon GNA15 silencing confirmed the impact of Gα15 on PDAC cells consistent with reduced PLCβ signaling and PKC activity (Fig. 5B,C).

PKD1 is expressed by pancreas cells and its promoter is a target of the KRAS-NF-κB pathway23. PKD1 protein is activated by KRAS and growth factors during the initiation of PDAC. Animal models showed PKD1 controls KRAS-dependent progression from metaplasia to preneoplastic lesions32 although we did not find a significant impact on the basal level of MAPK activation. PKD1 reduced activation was matched by the sensitization of AKT in response to IGF1 and insulin (Fig. 5D,E), as previously described in intestinal non-transformed IEC18 cells as a consequence p85α phosphorylation24. AKT signaling is widely considered carcinogenic and pro-tumorigenic, but it cannot be assumed to apply to all three isoforms and to all cancer cell types. For instance, in breast cancer, AKT 1 and AKT3 were reported to suppress motility33, invasion34 and metastasis35. Our study was limited to analyzing acute AKT activation in response to IGF since the basal activation state remained below the sensitivity threshold for both phosphorylation sites analyzed. Therefore, no direct inference can be made about AKT activity level and motility. The correlation between elevated expression of Gα15, early relapse, and poor survival, may result from supporting progenitor stages previously characterized by reduced AKT activity36. Our findings are consistent with data showing that silencing IGF/Insulin receptors sustained pluripotency of pancreatic progenitors37 and that silencing AKT, especially isoforms 1 and 3, evoked reprogramming of human pancreatic cancer cells towards stem cell-like properties25. Under the hypoxic conditions of the tumor niche, IGF stimulation could damage PDAC cells38. The upregulation of IGF stimulation could as well represent a compensatory effect. Similarly, the ablation of oncogenic drivers, such as KRASG12D or cMyc, produced compensatory autocrine upregulation of IGFR-AKT pathway that was interpreted as crucial for resistance of dormant cancer cells and recurrence39. Specifically designed studies are certainly required to verify if Gα15 may contribute to the dynamic modulation of AKT signaling to support slow cycling and invasive progenitor cells from the early phases of PDAC progression. Further studies are necessary to assess the contributions of insulin and IGF-1 under experimental settings that more closely reproduce the actual microenvironment present in patients with pancreatic cancer. Our findings indicate multiple variables must be considered, such as the specific AKT isoforms, their subcellular compartmentalization, tyrosin kinase receptor activation and the metabolic state of the cell.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the reallocation of methylated cysteines in the GNA15 gene is associated with the presence of Gα15 in PDAC, starting with precursor lesions and continuing through all stages of PDAC. GNA15 expression is detectable substantially above a negative background, concomitant with the expression of prognostic markers of aggressive progression and poorer survival. Loss-of-function studies in PDAC cell lines showed Gα15 sustains oncogenic signaling and cell motility. Our data support a rationale for further investigating the potential of GNA15 as an early marker of PDAC transformation and prognosis.

Abbreviations

GPCR:

G protein coupled receptor

IGF-1:

Insulin-like growth factor

IPMN:

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

PanIN:

Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

PDAC:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PKC:

Protein kinase C

PKD1:

Protein kinase D

References

  1. 1.

    O’Hayre, M. et al. The emerging mutational landscape of G proteins and G-protein-coupled receptors in cancer. Nat. Rev. 13, 412 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wilkie, T. M. et al. Evolution of the mammalian G protein alpha subunit multigene family. Nat. Genet. 1, 85–91 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Innamorati, G. et al. The curious case of Galphas gain-of-function in neoplasia. BMC Cancer 18, 293 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Giannone, F. et al. The puzzling uniqueness of the heterotrimeric G15 protein and its potential beyond hematopoiesis. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 44, 259–269 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wu, D., LaRosa, G. J. & Simon, M. I. G protein-coupled signal transduction pathways for interleukin-8 1. Science 261, 101–103 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Innamorati, G. et al. Heterotrimeric G proteins demonstrate differential sensitivity to beta-arrestin dependent desensitization. Cell Signal 21, 1135–1142 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Masuho, I. et al. A global map of G protein signaling regulation by RGS proteins. Cell 183, 503 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wilkie, T. M., Scherle, P. A., Strathmann, M. P., Slepak, V. Z. & Simon, M. I. Characterization of G-protein alpha subunits in the Gq class: Expression in murine tissues and in stromal and hematopoietic cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 10049–10053 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    de Jonge, H. J. et al. Gene expression profiling in the leukemic stem cell-enriched CD34+ fraction identifies target genes that predict prognosis in normal karyotype AML. Leukemia 25, 1825–1833 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Giovinazzo, F. et al. Ectopic expression of the heterotrimeric G15 protein in pancreatic carcinoma and its potential in cancer signal transduction. Cell. Signal. 25, 651–659 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kim, D. M., Choi, S. H., Yeom, Y. I., Min, S. H. & Kim, I. C. Genome-scale functional analysis of the human genes modulating p53 activity by regulating MDM2 expression in a p53-independent manner. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 478, 976–981 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal 6, pl1 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Safikhani, Z. et al. Gene isoforms as expression-based biomarkers predictive of drug response in vitro. Nat. Commun. 8, 1126 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Badea, L., Herlea, V., Dima, S. O., Dumitrascu, T. & Popescu, I. Combined gene expression analysis of whole-tissue and microdissected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma identifies genes specifically overexpressed in tumor epithelia. Hepatogastroenterology 55, 2016–2027 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Segara, D. et al. Expression of HOXB2, a retinoic acid signaling target in pancreatic cancer and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 11, 3587–3596 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pei, H. et al. FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating Akt. Cancer Cell 16, 259–266 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sondka, Z. et al. The COSMIC cancer gene census: Describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers. Nat. Rev. 18, 696–705 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A. et al. Discovery of novel tumor markers of pancreatic cancer using global gene expression technology. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 1239–1249 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Liu, A. M. et al. Galpha16 interacts with tetratricopeptide repeat 1 (TPR1) through its beta3 region to activate Ras independently of phospholipase Cbeta signaling. BMC Struct. Biol. 11, 17 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Peran, I., Madhavan, S., Byers, S. W. & McCoy, M. D. Curation of the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma subset of the cancer genome atlas is essential for accurate conclusions about survival-related molecular mechanisms. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 3813–3819 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Collisson, E. A., Bailey, P., Chang, D. K. & Biankin, A. V. Molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 207–220 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kalthoff, H. et al. Modulation of platelet-derived growth factor A- and B-chain/c-sis mRNA by tumor necrosis factor and other agents in adenocarcinoma cells. Oncogene 6, 1015–1021 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Doppler, H. et al. The PRKD1 promoter is a target of the KRas-NF-kappaB pathway in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 33758 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ni, Y., Sinnett-Smith, J., Young, S. H. & Rozengurt, E. PKD1 mediates negative feedback of PI3K/Akt activation in response to G protein-coupled receptors. PLoS ONE 8, e73149 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Arasanz, H. et al. Profound reprogramming towards stemness in pancreatic cancer cells as adaptation to AKT inhibition. Cancers 12, 2181 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liu, W. J. et al. High expression of GRK3 is associated with favorable prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 214, 228–232 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ocal, O. et al. A rapid in vivo screen for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapeutics. Dis. Model. Mech. 8, 1201–1211 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Huang, Y. S. et al. Activation of adhesion GPCR EMR2/ADGRE2 induces macrophage differentiation and inflammatory responses via Galpha16/Akt/MAPK/NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Front. Immunol. 8, 373 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Espinet, E. et al. Aggressive PDACs show hypomethylation of repetitive elements and the execution of an intrinsic IFN program linked to a ductal cell of origin. Cancer Discov. 11, 638–659 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bachet, J. B. et al. S100A2 is a predictive biomarker of adjuvant therapy benefit in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer 49, 2643–2653 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liu, A. M. et al. Galpha16 activates Ras by forming a complex with tetratricopeptide repeat 1 (TPR1) and Son of Sevenless (SOS). Cell. Signal. 22, 1448–1458 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liou, G. Y. et al. Protein kinase D1 drives pancreatic acinar cell reprogramming and progression to intraepithelial neoplasia. Nat. Commun. 6, 6200 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Clark, A. R. & Toker, A. Signalling specificity in the Akt pathway in breast cancer. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 1349–1355 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hinz, N. & Jucker, M. Distinct functions of AKT isoforms in breast cancer: A comprehensive review. Cell Commun. Signal 17, 154 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Toker, A. & Yoeli-Lerner, M. Akt signaling and cancer: Surviving but not moving on. Can. Res. 66, 3963–3966 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Dey-Guha, I. et al. A mechanism for asymmetric cell division resulting in proliferative asynchronicity. Mol. Cancer Res. 13, 223–230 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Okawa, E. R. et al. Essential roles of insulin and IGF-1 receptors during embryonic lineage development. Mol. Metab. 47, 101164 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Isohashi, F., Endo, H., Mukai, M., Inoue, T. & Inoue, M. Insulin-like growth factor stimulation increases radiosensitivity of a pancreatic cancer cell line through endoplasmic reticulum stress under hypoxic conditions. Cancer Sci. 99, 2395–2401 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rajbhandari, N., Lin, W. C., Wehde, B. L., Triplett, A. A. & Wagner, K. U. Autocrine IGF1 signaling mediates pancreatic tumor cell dormancy in the absence of oncogenic drivers. Cell Rep. 18, 2243–2255 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by AIRC, supporting Grants IG 17132 and IG 23282 to C. Bassi, by NCI, CA192381 to T. Wilkie. This study was performed in the LURM (Laboratorio Universitario di Ricerca Medica) Research Center, University of Verona.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: G.I., T.M.W., G.M.lp, M.P., R.S., C.B.; Acquisition of data: G.I., S.G., B.R., A.G., M.Z., V.G., M.D., S.C., F.G., B.E.L.; Supervision on acquisition of human biopsies: S.P., S.G., A.G., G.M.ll, R.S., L.G.; Supervision and acquisition of experimental tools: D.Z., M.S., F.G., B.E.L., R.T.L.; Analysis and interpretation of data: G.I., T.M.W., S.P., G.M.lb, B.E.L., L.dC., G.M.ll, M.P.; Drafting of the manuscript: G.I., T.M.W., G.M.lp, M.P., R.S., C.B.; Statistical analysis: G.M.lb, A.M., G.I., T.M.W.; Obtained funding: G.I., T.M.W., M.T.V., R.T.L., C.B., M.T.V.; Study supervision: G.I., T.M.W., M.P., M.T.V., C.B. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. This study was performed in the LURM (Laboratorio Universitario di Ricerca Medica) Research Center, University of Verona.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio Innamorati.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Innamorati, G., Wilkie, T.M., Malpeli, G. et al. Gα15 in early onset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 11, 14922 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94150-3

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing