Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

DES-Tcell is a knowledgebase for exploring immunology-related literature

An Author Correction to this article was published on 10 November 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

T-cells are a subtype of white blood cells circulating throughout the body, searching for infected and abnormal cells. They have multifaceted functions that include scanning for and directly killing cells infected with intracellular pathogens, eradicating abnormal cells, orchestrating immune response by activating and helping other immune cells, memorizing encountered pathogens, and providing long-lasting protection upon recurrent infections. However, T-cells are also involved in immune responses that result in organ transplant rejection, autoimmune diseases, and some allergic diseases. To support T-cell research, we developed the DES-Tcell knowledgebase (KB). This KB incorporates text- and data-mined information that can expedite retrieval and exploration of T-cell relevant information from the large volume of published T-cell-related research. This KB enables exploration of data through concepts from 15 topic-specific dictionaries, including immunology-related genes, mutations, pathogens, and pathways. We developed three case studies using DES-Tcell, one of which validates effective retrieval of known associations by DES-Tcell. The second and third case studies focuses on concepts that are common to Grave’s disease (GD) and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT). Several reports have shown that up to 20% of GD patients treated with antithyroid medication develop HT, thus suggesting a possible conversion or shift from GD to HT disease. DES-Tcell found miR-4442 links to both GD and HT, and that miR-4442 possibly targets the autoimmune disease risk factor CD6, which provides potential new knowledge derived through the use of DES-Tcell. According to our understanding, DES-Tcell is the first KB dedicated to exploring T-cell-relevant information via literature-mining, data-mining, and topic-specific dictionaries.

Introduction

The role of T-cells in the immune system

The immune system is a complex network of cells, tissues, and molecules working together to defend the body against invading organisms, and abnormal cancerous cells. It is composed of two cooperative arms including innate (or nonspecific) immunity, and adaptive (or specific) immunity1,2. One of the critical features of the immune system is self-discrimination, which refers to its ability to distinguish self (the body) from non-self (foreign invaders)3,4. Lymphocytes, the major cellular component of the immune system, are classified into two main types: T lymphocytes (T-cells) and B lymphocytes (B-cells). Both B- and T-cells originate from pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow. However, only B-cells mature there, while T-cells migrate to the thymus where they undergo a maturation process. When these newly generated naive cells undergo maturation and activation, they proliferate and differentiate into effector and memory subtype cells that have distinct functions. T-cells are specialized immune cells of the adaptive immune system and key players in mediating cellular immunity against abnormal cells, including pathogen-infected cells and cancer cells. They express a unique surface receptor called T-cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes a specific antigenic determinant displayed by a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the surface of other cells, such as antigen-presenting cells (APCs)4. The majority of T-cells express αβ TCR and either CD4 or CD8 molecules (also known as αβ T-cells), whereas a small proportion of “unconventional” T-cells express γδ TCR (also known as γδ T-cells)5,6. Different types of T-cells perform various functions including: (a) CD8 + cytotoxic T-cells recognize intracellular antigens and directly kill cells infected with intracellular pathogens (e.g., viral-infected cells) and tumor cells; (b) CD4 + helper T-cells recognize extracellular antigens and indirectly help with the clearing of extracellular pathogens by secreting cytokines that can enhance phagocytic cells (e.g., macrophages) and other T-cells; (c) regulatory T-cells are suppressor cells that play an essential role in regulating immune responses as well as maintaining immunological tolerance by preventing autoreactive T-cell activation in the periphery. Also, there are other subsets of T-cells include gamma delta T-cells (γδ T-cells), natural killer T-cell (NKT) and mucosal-associated invariant T-cells (MAIT)7,8,9.

Although T-cells play a crucial role in protective immunity, a hindrance of their functioning can cause immune-related diseases. For example, polymorphisms in CTLA-4 gene, which encodes a protein that delivers an inhibitory signal to T-cells, have been associated with autoimmune diseases, such as Grave’s disease, systemic lupus, and type 1 diabetes10,11. Moreover, genetic engineering of T-cells offers new therapeutic potential for cancer, infectious, and autoimmune diseases. For example, the adoptive transfer of genetically engineered T-cells redirected toward a specific tumor antigen has shown promising results in treating cancer, especially hematological malignancies12. However, many factors limit T-cell therapy, such as finding a potential target antigen and identifying new potential stimulatory/inhibitory molecules that can enhance the therapeutic T-cell efficacy and safety13.

These findings, amongst others, maintain interest in T-cell-related research. In fact, querying Web of Science (All Databases) in Clarivate Analytics (https://clarivate.com/) on 26 July 2019 using the query [T-cell* OR “T cell” OR “T cells” OR “T lymphocyte” OR “T lymphocytes” OR “T-lymphocyte” OR “T-lymphocytes” OR antigen* OR antibody OR autoimmun*], to retrieve all T-cell-related research, produced 509,627 articles published in the last five years. This number of published articles indicates that on average, ~ 102,000 articles are published yearly, a volume of information that would be challenging to analyze.

Exploring the plethora of published information

Given the enormous volume of scientific literature, it is necessary to deploy automated tools and resources for information search, retrieval, analysis, summarization, and hypotheses generation to expand domain-specific knowledge. In this regard, natural language processing (NLP), text-mining, and information integration systems are being used to tackle different biomedicine and life sciences problems. For example, studies demonstrate using text-mining to extract genotype–phenotype relationships14, identify patients with trileaflet aortic stenosis and coronary artery diseases15, extract terminologies of sleep disorders from journal articles16, and mining adverse drug events17. Moreover, applying text-mining in cancer research18, and psychiatry studies19. Processing scientific literature using text-mining approaches has also become a common theme20,21. Examples of such systems include:

  • Cancer Hallmark Analytics Tool (CHAT): for organizing and analyzing cancer-related literature22

  • DISEASES is a text-mining and data integration system of associations between genes and diseases23

  • PolySearch2: for discovering associations between multiple entities, including human diseases, genes, drugs, metabolites, and toxins24

  • DES-RedoxVasc: for summarizing the literature on redox control of vascular biology27

  • DDMGD: for extracting associations between methylated genes and diseases from scientific literature28,29.

The extracted information is saved in knowledgebases (KBs), facilitating storing, searching, retrieving, and visualizing scientific information. The biomedical domain has benefitted from the development of several of these KBs. For example, Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) is a resource for genetic, genomic, and biological information related to the laboratory mouse30. Norine is a KB dedicated to providing information related to non-ribosomal peptides31. Also, DMAK is a curated KB for pan-cancer DNA methylation32. Other cancer-related KBs are CanSar for cancer research and drug discovery33, the literature-based ECGene KB for endometrial cancer genes34, and PCOSKB associated with PolyCystic Ovary Syndrome35 that provide concepts from genes, diseases, ontology terms, and biochemical pathways. There is also SwissLipids, a KB for lipid biology36, and several other KBs developed for other domains37,38,39,40,41,42,43. Here we developed DES-Tcell for the exploration of immunology-related information, with a particular focus on T-cells.

The DES-Tcell exploration system

We created the DES-Tcell KB on June 20, 2020. DES-Tcell is developed based on the Dragon Exploration System (DES), used as the underlying framework for several topic-specific KBs25,26,28,29,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,58. The DES workflow has been described earlier44. In brief, we created a T-cell-specific literature corpus, as well as compiled topic-specific dictionaries, which are used to extract term-document mappings, subsequently used to determine statistically enriched concepts and pairs of concepts.

Literature corpus

To create the literature corpus incorporated into DES-Tcell, we queried the PubMed and PubMed Central articles in our local MongoDB repository for all T-cell-related articles. The query [T-cell* OR “T cell” OR “T cells” OR “T lymphocyte” OR “T lymphocytes” OR “T-lymphocyte” OR “T-lymphocytes” OR antigen* OR antibody OR autoimmun*] was used to retrieve the T-cell-related articles from PubMed and PubMed Central resources, which serve as the literature corpus. To ensure extraction of all the T-cell-related articles, the matching system used finds all documents with terms from the query. In this case, the literature corpus comprises more than 1.4 million articles.

Topic-relevant dictionaries

There are 15 topic-relevant dictionaries incorporated into this KB, which include the newly compiled dictionary, “Immunology Related (Various)” (see Table 1). The other 14 dictionaries were compiled and used in previously published KBs, developed through the DES framework (see Table 1). Thus, in Table 1, these 15 dictionaries are referred to as “pre-existing in DES.”

Table 1 List of dictionaries used in DES-Tcell with

All dictionary concepts are normalized to ensure that a concept referred to in the text by different symbols, names or synonyms is recognized as a single entity. For example, routinely used names/symbols/aliases in trusted sources such as Entrez Gene (for genes) with UniProt (for proteins) nomenclatures, are combined, to represent the genes and proteins they translate into as a single entity applied in the DES system. This normalization improves the accuracy of concepts’ enrichment estimates.

Concept-document mapping

We used the literature corpus and 15 dictionaries for concept-document mapping. This mapping information was used to determine the concepts most relevant to the T-cell functions. A concept was determined to be relevant to the KB if the frequency of the concept in the KBs literature corpus is significantly higher than its frequency in the full set of articles or background set. Specifically, we identified a concept as an enriched concept, if the concept had a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 in the DES-Tcell literature corpus when compared to the complete set of PubMed and PubMed Central articles in our local MongoDB literature repository. FDR was calculated based on the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to correct for multiplicity testing.

We also determined enriched pairs of concepts, based on the abundance of concepts co-occurrence as compared to the occurrence of the individual concepts. These pairs of concepts may or may not be associated, but there is a high probability that the concept pairs are associated when concept pairs are enriched.

From all the concepts in the 15 dictionaries used in DES-Tcell, 76,748 concepts were determined as statistically enriched concepts, and 7,230,602 concept pairs were determined as statistically enriched pairs of concepts (see KB statistics in Table 2). The number of enriched concepts per dictionary is provided in Table 1.

Table 2 Statistics of the DES-Tcell knowledgebase.

We also computed the semantic similarity between any two concepts within the KB. The similarity metric indicates that there is a likeness or closeness between two concepts, in DES-Tcell. Likeness or closeness based on concept co-occurrence may not be direct. The cosine distance between two concept embeddings was used to calculate semantic similarity in DES-Tcell. We obtained these embeddings from a skip-gram Word2Vec model trained on the DES-Tcell literature corpus. The literature corpus, the 15 dictionaries, the enriched concepts, the enriched pairs of concepts, and semantically related concepts were integrated to create DES-Tcell.

Knowledgebase utilities and case studies

We designed DES-Tcell to allow easy exploration of concepts enriched in immunology-related literature focused on T-cells. Salhi et al., provide a detailed description of several links provided in DES-Tcell that facilitates the exploration of concepts in different contexts55. Briefly, users can explore the enriched concepts in immunology-related information via the “Enriched Concepts” link. One can also explore the enriched co-occurring concepts (in the title/abstract level and full-text document when the concepts are within 200-character proximity) using the “Enriched Pairs” link. To further facilitate the natural exploration of literature, users can also use the “Column visibility” tab. This tab provides links to explore enriched concepts using ranking options for false discovery rate (FDR), density, term frequency within KB, and term frequency in literature. FDR is calculated based on the Benjamini–Hochberg algorithm. Also, all concepts are in topic-specific dictionaries that are color-coded, and each concept can be clicked on to explore its “Network” and “Term Co-occurrence” links. The “Network” link allows users to generate multilayered networks of associated biomedical concepts. Also, a “Literature” link allows users to explore the literature associated with the enriched concepts in DES-Tcell. Furthermore, DES also provides a new “Semantic Similarity” link described in Essack et al.27. Here, it should be recognized that links found through semantic similarity is not as obvious as links found simply through co-occurrence of concepts or concept being linked through a common factor as semantic similarity offers concept associations based on a Word2Vec embedding of the corpus, as described above.

Case study 1: Using “Enriched Concept” to demonstrate that DES-Tcell retrieves reasonable associations.

DES-Tcell can be used to quickly develop an insight to the concepts that are most relevant in immunology-related to T-cells. For example, to find out which immunology-related genes are involved in T-cell activation, the user may choose the “Enriched Pairs” view button (in the left side panel). This page will display two columns; in the first column insert “regulation of T-cell activation” and select the “Immunology Related (Various)” in the second column (sorted by FDR). The list of immunology-related genes, most often associated with T-cell activation in the text, will be displayed. In the list, we selected the concept “CD28”, then used this concept right-click menu to generate a network (Fig. 1, Step 1). On the “Network” page, we selected the “Immunology Related (Various)” dictionary. Then, the “CD28” node was highlighted and expanded by the associated terms from the selected dictionary (Fig. 1, Step 2).

Figure 1
figure1

Illustrates the efficacy of DES-Tcell to retrieve established or strong associations. Only the top 10 associations of genes/proteins linked to CD28 as found in the DES-Tcell KB are shown. The nodes represent concepts from the “immunology related (various)” dictionary. Depending on the co-occurrence frequency, the color of edges will range from black (strong association) to grey (weaker association), and the number on each edge represents the number of documents that link the potentially associated nodes.

To confirm the genes nodes are known or valid associations retrieved by DES-Tcell, we checked the literature suggested by DES-Tcell. Past research shows that all genes/proteins retrieved are associated with T-cell activation. That is, APCs fully activate the T-cell via receiving three signals that include TCR signaling which is triggered when the TCR together with the CD4/CD8 co-receptors recognize a peptide/MHC complex (signal1), in combination with co-stimulatory signal (signal 2)71. CD28 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) are proteins/receptors on the T-cell surface that provide co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory signals, respectively, amongst others (such as ICOS and PD-1) which are involved in the regulation of T-cell activation by APCs72. Both CD28 and CTLA-4 bind to the same receptor on APC called B7 molecules (CD80/CD86)73, which are upregulated upon activation by the innate immune responses, but the outcome will be different, that is: 1/ engagement of CD28 will result in T-cell activation, and 2/engagement of CTLA-4 will inhibit the T-cell activation (act as a suppressor). Following stimulation of T-cells by TCR/CD28 signaling, the activated T-cells in their clonal expansion and differentiation into effector cells secrets IL-2 cytokine. This stimulation can also be enhanced by a third signal that is provided by pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by APCs (macrophages and/or dendritic cells), cytokines such as IL-2, IFNγ, and IL-1274,75. High-affinity IL-2 receptor (IL2R) is also induced upon T-cell activation resulting in the enhanced T-cell ability of binding and responding to secreted IL-2, an essential cytokine in enhancing T-cell proliferation and survival76. Taken together, our literature search shows that all genes/proteins nodes in Fig. 1 have a valid association with CD28.

Despite these true associations, during the literature search process, we observed several limitations. For example, some genes/proteins synonyms are ambiguous with general terms, such as CAN, which results in false-positive associations. Also, normalizing the terms/phrases does not entirely eradicate inconsistencies in disease nomenclature. Furthermore, the linked nodes in the generated networks do not necessarily reflect a direct relationship but rather indicate two concepts discussed in the same text.

Case study 2: miR-4442 possibly targets CD6 and suggests novel insight derived through the use of DES-Tcell.

Grave’s disease is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the production of autoantibodies against TSHR that causes hyperthyroidism77,78. On the other hand, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) is an autoimmune disorder that is characterized by the production of autoantibodies against thyroid peroxidase (TPO) that causes hypothyroidism79. However, autoantibodies against TPO were also found present in GD patients80, suggesting a close association between these diseases. Several reports have shown that up to 20% of GD patients treated with antithyroid medication develop HT81,82,83,84. Thus, there is a possibility of conversion or shift from GD to HT disease. There is also a role of Treg in the natural progression of GD to HT. Moreover, there is a link between these diseases and mutations in CTLA-4 and CD28 genes that are associated with T-cell activation. New insights could help to increase our understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for the shift between diseases.

In search of novel insights, we also looked at the associations of concepts based on semantic similarity using the “Semantic Similarity” link. In the search bar, we typed the concept of interest “Hashimoto”, then select the “Human microRNAs” dictionary to view the concepts in this dictionary that have semantic similarity to our selected concept “Hashimoto” (Fig. 2, step2a). This process was repeated using another concept, “Graves” (Fig. 2, step2b). We find four of the five top-ranked concepts, “MIR4442”, “MIR2112”, “MIR5633”, and “MIR1380” being linked to both GD and HT. However, current published literature could not provide any information about these miRNAs’ functions in GD or HT. Consequently, we used miRWalk for miRNA target prediction85. We did not retrieve any result for “MIR2112”, “MIR5633”, and “MIR1380 but retrieved several predicted targets of “MIR4442” including CD6. CD6 is a cell surface marker expressed on immature thymocytes, the majority of mature T-cells and a subset of B-cells and NK cells. Its expression is induced by CD2 upon thymocyte maturation and following T-cell activation, and CD6 binds to its broadly expressed ligand CD166/ALCAM (activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule)86. Thus, it promotes T-cell adhesion to APCs and involves in the immunological synapses’ stabilization and maturation87. In addition, CD6 synergizes with TCR or CD28 as a co-stimulatory molecule that can enhance T-cell activation and proliferation87,88,89,90. Singer et al. has shown that CD6 is also involved in the survival and selection of thymocyte in humans and mice89. Recently, CD6 is found to be a risk factor for some autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Behcet’s disease91,92. Accordingly, anti-CD6 monoclonal antibodies have been developed as a potential therapy for autoimmune diseases, which have been shown to restrain the proliferation of autoreactive T-cells or antigen-dependent activation of T-cells93. As CD6 expression is also increased in autoreactive T-cells, studies showed that monoclonal antibody targeting CD6 (UMCD6) could inhibit a clone of autoreactive T-cells in vitro94. Taken together, although current literature shows no evidence for microRNA “MIR4442” functions in GD or HT diseases, DES-Tcell suggests potential association of this microRNA to GD/HT diseases and the possibility of involvement in GD conversion to HT. Therefore, DES-Tcell associations are suggested as potentially new immunological knowledge.

Figure 2
figure2

The step-by-step illustration of how DES-Tcell can be used to identify microRNA’s potentially association to Grave’s disease (step 2a) and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (step 2b) and provide the potential target of the identified microRNA.

Case study 3: DES-Tcell suggests MEG3 may be a potential therapeutic target for GD.

Alteration in the metabolic activity is required for T-cell proliferation, differentiation, and effector functions95. That is, metabolism is increased upon T-cell activation, and it has been demonstrated that glucose deprivation resulted in impaired lymphocyte activation and function96. Thus, we further explore this association between glucose metabolism and lymphocyte proliferation using “Enriched Concepts”. We started this process by filtering the “Pathways (KEGG, Reactome, Unipathway, Panter)” dictionary with ‘Glucose metabolism’ and then generated a network from the right-click menu attached to the “Glucose metabolism” concept (Fig. 3, step 1). To find the concept associated with this node, we then selected the “Biological process (GO)” dictionary, specified 50 nodes as the maximum connection, and highlighted the “Glucose metabolism” node to select “Expand from this term” (Fig. 3, step 2). This process retrieved several biological processes, but we removed all the nodes except “lymphocyte proliferation” to ensure that the retrieved nodes in subsequent steps are linked to these two concepts. We then selected the Disease Ontology “DOID Ontology (Bioportal)” dictionary and expanded the “Glucose metabolism” and the “lymphocyte proliferation” nodes with terms from these dictionaries. We also simplified the resulting network by removing all nodes with a single link. Here, we retrieved several concepts from the “DOID Ontology (Bioportal)” dictionary including different types of cancer (such as “T-cell leukemia”, “Burkitt lymphoma”, “thymoma”, “Kaposi’s sarcoma” and “colon carcinoma”), autoimmune diseases (such as “Graves’ disease”, “autoimmune thyroiditis”, and “type 1 diabetes mellitus”), infectious diseases (such as “salmonellosis”, “typhoid fever” and “visceral leishmaniasis”) and other syndromes/conditions (such as “malnutrition”, “chronic fatigue syndrome”, “transient myeloproliferative syndrome”, and “systemic inflammatory response syndrome”) were linked to both the “lymphocyte proliferation” and “glucose metabolism” nodes. However, since lymphocyte proliferation is induced by thyroid autoantigens in autoimmune thyroid diseases such as Graves’ disease and autoimmune thyroiditis97, we removed all disease nodes except “Graves’ disease” and “autoimmune thyroiditis” (also known as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT)) (Fig. 3, step 3). Moreover, it has been shown that hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism caused by GD and HT, respectively, can result in glucose intolerance and insulin resistance98,99. To expand the associations, we specified 20 nodes as the maximum connection, and we chose to expand from all nodes including the “Graves’ disease”, “autoimmune thyroiditis” “Glucose metabolism” and “lymphocyte proliferation” by clicking on “Immunology Related (Various)” dictionary only. Then, we simplified the resulting network by removing all nodes with two links (Fig. 3, step 4). This revealed a set of genes including “CD4”, “IFNA1” and “CCL5” that are linked to “lymphocyte proliferation” and “glucose metabolism” and also linked to both diseases including “Graves’ disease” and “autoimmune thyroiditis”. Expanding all three genes (“CD4”, “IFNA1” and “CCL5”) and other nodes in our network with the “Human microRNAs” dictionary and simplifying the resulted network by removing all nodes with 3 links showed that all the three genes are controlled by different miRNAs including miR-155, miR-146, and miR-21. As miRNAs’ functions can be controlled by long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), we chose to expand all miRNAs as well as all other nodes in our network with the “Human Long Non-Coding RNAs” dictionary, and once again, the resulted network was simplified by removing all nodes with three links. The resulting network revealed that all three genes are essentially controlled by ‘miR-155’ and that maternally expressed gene 3 ‘MEG3’ is the only lncRNA associated with ‘miR-155’ (Fig. 3, step 5).

Figure 3
figure3

Step-by-step illustration of how DES-Tcell can be used to explore potentially new therapeutic targets for Graves’ disease.

‘CCL5’ is an essential proinflammatory chemokine (also called RANTES) that regulates cell metabolism in activated T cells (including CD4+ helper T cells) as well as cell migration (chemotaxis) to the site of inflammation via activation of its cognate receptor including CCR5100,101. CCL5-CCR5 signaling induces cellular metabolic activity by increasing the expression of glucose transporter 1 (Glut1), glucose uptake (mTOR-dependent), and intracellular ATP levels101,102. Increased levels of serum CCL5 have been observed in GD patients as well as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), insulin resistance (IR) and insulin secretion99,103,104.

Another subset of CD4+ T cells, called regulatory T cells (Tregs), which plays an indispensable role in preserving immunological tolerance to self-antigens as well as homeostasis, is also involved in the development of GD105. Decreased numbers of Tregs and impairment in their immunosuppressive functions have been observed in GD patients106. ‘miR-155’ is highly expressed in Tregs and regulated by the transcription factor FOXP3 (forkhead box protein P3), which acts as a master regulator for Treg development and function107,108. Another miRNA that appeared in our network is ‘miR-146a’ which is ubiquitously expressed in Tregs and plays a pivotal role in Treg cell-mediated suppressive function109. Both ‘miR-155’ and ‘miR-146a’ levels of expression were found to be significantly low in GD patients compared to healthy controls110. Thus, decreased expression of ‘miR-155’ may positively correlate with decreased FOXP3 expression and Treg numbers and impaired Treg function was seen in GD patients110,111.

Taken together, although current literature shows no evidence for “MEG3” functions in GD, DES-Tcell suggests a potential association of this lncRNA to GD. This idea is strengthened by the Yu et al. study that shows ‘miR-155’ (that we know to be involved in GD) is a direct target of the ‘MEG3’ which acts by sponging ‘miR-155’ in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells112. Therefore, this DES-Tcell association is suggested as potentially new immunological knowledge and should be considered a potential therapeutic target.

Concluding remarks

DES-Tcell allows for exploration of numerous concepts and associated pairs of concepts related to immunology, based on analyzed literature and associated data-mining. Topic-specific dictionaries provide the concepts used. DES-Tcell has identified over 7.2 million enriched associations of concepts, based on the co-occurrence of the concepts within 200 characters distance. These associated concepts are enriched, when compared to documents in the background (all articles in PubMed and PMC in our local repository), as well as the individual concepts they comprise of. We further provide an additional set of associated concepts based on semantic similarity between any of the enriched concepts and dictionary concepts. These associations are likely meaningful if they have > 0.75 similarities and DES-Tcell provides more than 10 million such associations.

The case studies demonstrate that this system can retrieve valid associations and suggest potentially new insights. However, the new insights indicated in the case studies are neither experimentally validated statements nor automatically generated hypotheses, but a proposition made by the authors by exploring the relevant links among the discussed entities, as detailed in the case study. Previous versions of DES included a hypothesis generator, but this was abandoned in favor of leaving this task to the user. The reason being, as the practical use of the system, showed that automatically generated hypotheses were seldom used, mainly due to 1/their sheer number (combinatorial explosion from the knowledge graph), even when ranking and stringent cut-offs are applied, hence, they inflate the KB unnecessarily, and 2/starting with a concept, or an association, and their context within the literature is the more natural way of exploring related information.

DES-Tcell carries all shortcomings similar to other text-mining-based approaches. The KB uses a dictionary-based system for indexing, which has been a widely used approach so far. However, with recent breakthroughs in NLP research, mainly thanks to novel deep-learning architectures and vast amounts of training data, jumps in performance in various NLP tasks such as text-generation and prediction spur applying such research to biomedical text-mining again. Better entity recognition models can mitigate dictionary cleaning, term ambiguity, and promiscuous terms-related problems introduced by controlled vocabularies. Such issues stem from the use of pre-defined terms rather than extracting mentions dependent on context. However, adopting such models would introduce major changes to the system, so it is within our long-term goals.

Nonetheless, for now, our system provides indexing of a comprehensive list of dictionaries relevant to immunology into the literature. Hence allowing quick access to term mentions in context.

  • Term associations across documents.

  • Potentially insights into missing links.

The user interface provides searching, filtering, and sorting functionality. The network tab provides a quick and accessible exploration of small knowledge-graphs, centered around several entities of interest at once. We believe the knowledge base would be an asset to the immunology research community, as it indexes more than 1 M documents with a wealth of biological entities. Also, we will update the KB biannually to include newly published articles and updated dictionaries.

Data availability

The DES-Tcell portal is free for academic and nonprofit users and can be accessed at http://cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/des-tcell/.

Change history

References

  1. 1.

    Vivier, E. & Malissen, B. Innate and adaptive immunity: Specificities and signaling hierarchies revisited. Nat. Immunol. 6, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1153 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McComb, S., Thiriot, A., Krishnan, L. & Stark, F. Introduction to the immune system. Methods Mol. Biol. 1061, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-589-7_1 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Eisen, H. N. & Chakraborty, A. K. Evolving concepts of specificity in immune reactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 22373–22380. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012051108 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Xing, Y. & Hogquist, K. A. T-cell tolerance: Central and peripheral. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 4. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006957 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Wu, Y. L. et al. gammadelta T cells and their potential for immunotherapy. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 10, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.7823 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Attaf, M., Legut, M., Cole, D. K. & Sewell, A. K. The T cell antigen receptor: The Swiss army knife of the immune system. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 181, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12622 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Golubovskaya, V. & Wu, L. Different subsets of T cells, memory, effector functions, and CAR-T immunotherapy. Cancers 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8030036 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Wu, L. & Van Kaer, L. Natural killer T cells in health and disease. Front. Biosci. 3, 236–251 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Le Bourhis, L. et al. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells: Unconventional development and function. Trends Immunol. 32, 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2011.02.005 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Magistrelli, G. et al. A soluble form of CTLA-4 generated by alternative splicing is expressed by nonstimulated human T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 3596–3602. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199911)29:11%3c3596::AID-IMMU3596%3e3.0.CO;2-Y (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Saverino, D., Simone, R., Bagnasco, M. & Pesce, G. The soluble CTLA-4 receptor and its role in autoimmune diseases: An update. Auto- Immun. Highlights 1, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13317-010-0011-7 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dudley, M. E. & Rosenberg, S. A. Adoptive-cell-transfer therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 666–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1167 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kunert, A. et al. TCR-engineered T cells meet new challenges to treat solid tumors: Choice of antigen, T cell fitness, and sensitization of tumor milieu. Front. Immunol. 4, 363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00363 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Singhal, A., Simmons, M. & Lu, Z. Text mining genotype-phenotype relationships from biomedical literature for database curation and precision medicine. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005017 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Small, A. M. et al. Text mining applied to electronic cardiovascular procedure reports to identify patients with trileaflet aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. J. Biomed. Inform. 72, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.016 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lam, C. et al. Text mining of journal articles for sleep disorder terminologies. PloS one 11, e0156031 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Harpaz, R. et al. Text mining for adverse drug events: The promise, challenges, and state of the art. Drug Saf. 37, 777–790 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhu, F. et al. Biomedical text mining and its applications in cancer research. J. Biomed. Inform. 46, 200–211 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Abbe, A., Grouin, C., Zweigenbaum, P. & Falissard, B. Text mining applications in psychiatry: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 25, 86–100 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jung, K. et al. Functional evaluation of out-of-the-box text-mining tools for data-mining tasks. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002902 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wei, C. H., Leaman, R. & Lu, Z. Beyond accuracy: Creating interoperable and scalable text-mining web services. Bioinformatics 32, 1907–1910. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv760 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Baker, S. et al. Cancer hallmarks analytics tool (CHAT): A text mining approach to organize and evaluate scientific literature on cancer. Bioinformatics 33, 3973–3981. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx454 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pletscher-Frankild, S., Palleja, A., Tsafou, K., Binder, J. X. & Jensen, L. J. DISEASES: Text mining and data integration of disease-gene associations. Methods 74, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.020 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liu, Y., Liang, Y. & Wishart, D. PolySearch2: A significantly improved text-mining system for discovering associations between human diseases, genes, drugs, metabolites, toxins and more. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W535-542. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv383 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chowdhary, R. et al. PIMiner: A web tool for extraction of protein interactions from biomedical literature. Int. J. Data Min. Bioinform. 7, 450–462 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chowdhary, R. et al. Context-specific protein network miner—An online system for exploring context-specific protein interaction networks from the literature. PLoS ONE 7, e34480. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034480 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Essack, M. et al. Literature-based enrichment insights into redox control of vascular biology. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 1769437. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1769437 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bin Raies, A., Mansour, H., Incitti, R. & Bajic, V. B. Combining position weight matrices and document-term matrix for efficient extraction of associations of methylated genes and diseases from free text. PLoS ONE 8, e77848. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077848 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bin Raies, A., Mansour, H., Incitti, R. & Bajic, V. B. DDMGD: The database of text-mined associations between genes methylated in diseases from different species. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D879–D886. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1168 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Eppig, J. T. Mouse genome informatics (MGI) resource: Genetic, genomic, and biological knowledgebase for the laboratory mouse. ILAR J. 58, 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilx013 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Flissi, A. et al. Norine, the knowledgebase dedicated to non-ribosomal peptides, is now open to crowdsourcing. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1113-1118. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1143 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tang, B. DMAK: A curated pan-cancer DNA methylation annotation knowledgebase. Bioengineered 8, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2016.1218582 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tym, J. E. et al. canSAR: An updated cancer research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D938-943. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1030 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhao, M., Liu, Y. & O’Mara, T. A. ECGene: A literature-based knowledgebase of endometrial cancer genes. Hum. Mutat. 37, 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22950 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Joseph, S., Barai, R. S., Bhujbalrao, R. & Idicula-Thomas, S. PCOSKB: A knowledgebase on genes, diseases, ontology terms and biochemical pathways associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1032-1035. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1146 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Aimo, L. et al. The SwissLipids knowledgebase for lipid biology. Bioinformatics 31, 2860–2866. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv285 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wang, D., Cunningham, R., Boom, J., Amith, M. & Tao, C. Towards a HPV vaccine knowledgebase for patient education content. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 225, 432–436 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Amberger, J. S. & Hamosh, A. Searching online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM): A knowledgebase of human genes and genetic phenotypes. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 58, 1 2 1–1 2 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.27 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Fabregat, A. et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D481-487. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1351 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Whittenburg, L. Clinical knowledgebase integration of nursing terminology. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 225, 850–851 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mallona, I., Jorda, M. & Peinado, M. A. A knowledgebase of the human Alu repetitive elements. J. Biomed. Inform. 60, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.010 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lu, J. et al. Developing a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model knowledgebase in support of provisional model construction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004495 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liu, Y., Sun, J. & Zhao, M. Literature-based knowledgebase of pancreatic cancer gene to prioritize the key genes and pathways. J. Genet. Genomics 43, 569–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.006 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kordopati, V. et al. DES-mutation: System for exploring links of mutations and diseases. Sci. Rep. 8, 13359. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31439-w (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Salhi, A. et al. DES-ncRNA: A knowledgebase for exploring information about human micro and long noncoding RNAs based on literature-mining. RNA Biol. 14, 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2017.1312243 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Salhi, A. et al. DES-TOMATO: A knowledge exploration system focused on tomato species. Sci. Rep. 7, 5968. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05448-0 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dawe, A. S. et al. DESTAF: A database of text-mined associations for reproductive toxins potentially affecting human fertility. Reprod. Toxicol. 33, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.12.007 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Essack, M., Radovanovic, A. & Bajic, V. B. Information exploration system for sickle cell disease and repurposing of hydroxyfasudil. PLoS ONE 8, e65190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065190 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Essack, M. et al. DDEC: Dragon database of genes implicated in esophageal cancer. BMC Cancer 9, 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-219 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kwofie, S. K. et al. Dragon exploratory system on hepatitis C virus (DESHCV). Infect. Genet. Evol. 11, 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2010.12.006 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kwofie, S. K., Schaefer, U., Sundararajan, V. S., Bajic, V. B. & Christoffels, A. HCVpro: Hepatitis C virus protein interaction database. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11, 1971–1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.09.001 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Maqungo, M. et al. DDPC: Dragon database of genes associated with prostate cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D980-985. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq849 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sagar, S. et al. DDESC: Dragon database for exploration of sodium channels in human. BMC Genomics 9, 622. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-622 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Sagar, S., Kaur, M., Radovanovic, A. & Bajic, V. B. Dragon exploration system on marine sponge compounds interactions. J. Cheminform. 5, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-5-11 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Salhi, A. et al. DESM: Portal for microbial knowledge exploration systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D624-633. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1147 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bajic, V. B. et al. Dragon plant biology explorer. A text-mining tool for integrating associations between genetic and biochemical entities with genome annotation and biochemical terms lists. Plant Physiol. 138, 1914–1925. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.060863 (2005).

  57. 57.

    Pan, H. et al. Dragon TF association miner: A system for exploring transcription factor associations through text-mining. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W230-234. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh484 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kaur, M. et al. Database for exploration of functional context of genes implicated in ovarian cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D820-823. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn593 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Gene Ontology, C. Gene Ontology Consortium: Going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1049-1056. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1179 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ogata, H. et al. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.1.29 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wei, C. H., Kao, H. Y. & Lu, Z. PubTator: A web-based text mining tool for assisting biocuration. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W518-522. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt441 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Morgat, A. et al. UniPathway: A resource for the exploration and annotation of metabolic pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D761-769. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1023 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mi, H. et al. The PANTHER database of protein families, subfamilies, functions and pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D284-288. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki078 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kibbe, W. A. et al. Disease Ontology 2015 update: An expanded and updated database of human diseases for linking biomedical knowledge through disease data. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1071-1078. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1011 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kohler, S. et al. The human phenotype ontology in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D865–D876. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1039 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kuhn, M., Letunic, I., Jensen, L. J. & Bork, P. The SIDER database of drugs and side effects. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1075-1079. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1075 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank 5.0: A major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D1074–D1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1037 (2018).

  68. 68.

    Maglott, D., Ostell, J., Pruitt, K. D. & Tatusova, T. Entrez gene: Gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D52-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1237 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Yates, B. et al. Genenames.org: The HGNC and VGNC resources in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D619–D625. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1033 (2017).

  70. 70.

    Wei, C. H., Harris, B. R., Kao, H. Y. & Lu, Z. tmVar: A text mining approach for extracting sequence variants in biomedical literature. Bioinformatics 29, 1433–1439. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt156 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Rudd, C. E., Taylor, A. & Schneider, H. CD28 and CTLA-4 coreceptor expression and signal transduction. Immunol. Rev. 229, 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00770.x (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Chen, L. & Flies, D. B. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3405 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Keir, M. E. & Sharpe, A. H. The B7/CD28 costimulatory family in autoimmunity. Immunol. Rev. 204, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00242.x (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Beyersdorf, N., Kerkau, T. & Hunig, T. CD28 co-stimulation in T-cell homeostasis: A recent perspective. ImmunoTargets Ther. 4, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S61647 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Curtsinger, J. M. et al. Inflammatory cytokines provide a third signal for activation of naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 162, 3256–3262 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Kopp, E. B. & Ghosh, S. NF-kappa B and rel proteins in innate immunity. Adv. Immunol. 58, 1–27 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Morshed, S. A., Latif, R. & Davies, T. F. Delineating the autoimmune mechanisms in Graves’ disease. Immunol. Res. 54, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-012-8312-8 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Lopomo, A. & Berrih-Aknin, S. Autoimmune thyroiditis and myasthenia gravis. Front. Endocrinol. 8, 169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00169 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zaletel, K. & Gaberscek, S. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: From genes to the disease. Curr. Genomics 12, 576–588. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920211798120763 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Iddah, M. A. & Macharia, B. N. Autoimmune thyroid disorders. ISRN Endocrinol. 2013, 509764. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/509764 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Umar, H., Muallima, N., Adam, J. M. & Sanusi, H. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis following Graves’ disease. Acta Med. Indones. 42, 31–35 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Hedley, A. J., Young, R. E., Jones, S. J., Alexander, W. D. & Bewsher, P. D. Antithyroid drugs in the treatment of hyperthyroidism of Graves' disease: Long-term follow-up of 434 patients. Scottish Automated Follow-Up Register Group. Clin. Endocrinol. 31, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1989.tb01244.x (1989).

  83. 83.

    Sugrue, D., McEvoy, M., Feely, J. & Drury, M. I. Hyperthyroidism in the land of Graves: Results of treatment by surgery, radio-iodine and carbimazole in 837 cases. Q. J. Med. 49, 51–61 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Wood, L. C. & Ingbar, S. H. Hypothyroidism as a late sequela in patient with Graves’ disease treated with antithyroid agents. J. Clin. Investig. 64, 1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109601 (1979).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Sticht, C., De La Torre, C., Parveen, A. & Gretz, N. miRWalk: An online resource for prediction of microRNA binding sites. PLoS One 13, e0206239 (2018)

  86. 86.

    Santos, R. F., Oliveira, L. & Carmo, A. M. Tuning T cell activation: The function of CD6 at the immunological synapse and in T cell responses. Curr. Drug Targets 17, 630–639 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Gimferrer, I. et al. Relevance of CD6-mediated interactions in T cell activation and proliferation. J. Immunol. 173, 2262–2270. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2262 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Bowen, M. A., Aruffo, A. A. & Bajorath, J. Cell surface receptors and their ligands: In vitro analysis of CD6-CD166 interactions. Proteins 40, 420–428 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Singer, N. G. et al. CD6: Expression during development, apoptosis and selection of human and mouse thymocytes. Int. Immunol. 14, 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxf025 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Oliveira, M. I. et al. CD6 attenuates early and late signaling events, setting thresholds for T-cell activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 42, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201040528 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Lindhout, D., Frets, P. G. & Niermeijer, M. F. Approaches to genetic counseling. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 630, 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb19591.x (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Zheng, M. et al. Genetic polymorphisms of cell adhesion molecules in Behcet’s disease in a Chinese Han population. Sci. Rep. 6, 24974. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24974 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Alonso-Ramirez, R. et al. Rationale for targeting CD6 as a treatment for autoimmune diseases. Arthritis 2010, 130646. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/130646 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Li, Y. et al. CD6 as a potential target for treating multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 2687–2692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615253114 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Kouidhi, S., Elgaaied, A. B. & Chouaib, S. Impact of metabolism on T-cell differentiation and function and cross talk with tumor microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 8, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00270 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Wei, J., Raynor, J., Nguyen, T. L. & Chi, H. Nutrient and metabolic sensing in T cell responses. Front. Immunol. 8, 247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00247 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Weetman, A. P., Gunn, C., Hall, R. & McGregor, A. M. Thyroid autoantigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation in Graves’ disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. J. Clin. Lab. Immunol. 17, 1–6 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Brenta, G. Why can insulin resistance be a natural consequence of thyroid dysfunction?. J. Thyroid Res. 2011, 152850. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/152850 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Hu, Y. et al. Glucose metabolism before and after radioiodine therapy of a patient with Graves’ disease: Assessment by continuous glucose monitoring. Biomed. Rep. 7, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2017.932 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Appay, V. & Rowland-Jones, S. L. RANTES: A versatile and controversial chemokine. Trends Immunol. 22, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-4906(00)01812-3 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Gao, D., Rahbar, R. & Fish, E. N. CCL5 activation of CCR5 regulates cell metabolism to enhance proliferation of breast cancer cells. Open Biol. 6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160122 (2016).

  102. 102.

    Chan, O., Burke, J. D., Gao, D. F. & Fish, E. N. The chemokine CCL5 regulates glucose uptake and AMP kinase signaling in activated T cells to facilitate chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 29406–29416. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.348946 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Domberg, J. et al. Circulating chemokines in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Hormone Metab. Res. 40, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1073151 (2008).

  104. 104.

    Gao, G. et al. Glycemic variation in uncontrolled Graves’ disease patients with normal glucose metabolism: Assessment by continuous glucose monitoring. Endocrine 64, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1820-0 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Pan, D., Shin, Y. H., Gopalakrishnan, G., Hennessey, J. & De Groot, L. J. Regulatory T cells in Graves’ disease. Clin. Endocrinol. 71, 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03544.x (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Wang, Z. et al. Integrative analysis of mRNA and miRNA array data reveals the suppression of retinoic acid pathway in regulatory T cells of Graves’ disease. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 99, E2620-2627. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1883 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Kohlhaas, S. et al. Cutting edge: the Foxp3 target miR-155 contributes to the development of regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 182, 2578–2582. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803162 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Soltanzadeh-Yamchi, M., Shahbazi, M., Aslani, S. & Mohammadnia-Afrouzi, M. MicroRNA signature of regulatory T cells in health and autoimmunity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 100, 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.030 (2018).

  109. 109.

    Lu, L. F. et al. Function of miR-146a in controlling Treg cell-mediated regulation of Th1 responses. Cell 142, 914–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.012 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Zheng, L., Zhuang, C., Wang, X. & Ming, L. Serum miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-210 as potential markers of Graves' disease. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22266 (2018).

  111. 111.

    Zheng, L. et al. Foxp3 gene polymorphisms and haplotypes associate with susceptibility of Graves’ disease in Chinese Han population. Int. Immunopharmacol. 25, 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2015.02.020 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Yu, Y. et al. LncRNA MEG3 contributes to drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia by positively regulating ALG9 through sponging miR-155. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 42, 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13225 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Base Research Fund BAS/1/1059-01-01 and BAS/1/1606-01-01 awarded to T.G. and VBB, respectively. M.E. was supported by KAUST Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) Awards No. FCC/1/1976-17-01.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.B.B. conceived the study; M.E., A.A.S. and V.B.B. designed the study. A.S. conducted the main technical development; F.T. and A.H. contributed to technical implementation; M.U. and C.V.N. updated dictionaries; M.E. and A.A.S. analyzed data and developed the examples; T.G., A.B.R., M.E., and A.A.S. wrote the main manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magbubah Essack.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained errors. Original Reference 79 was removed, and other references were re-ordered accordingly.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AlSaieedi, A., Salhi, A., Tifratene, F. et al. DES-Tcell is a knowledgebase for exploring immunology-related literature. Sci Rep 11, 14344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93809-1

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing