Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Healthcare-related impact of gout in hospitalized patients in Spain

Abstract

To analyze the epidemiology, clinical features and costs of hospitalized patients with gout during the last decade in Spain. Retrospective observational study based on data from the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) from the Spanish National Health Service database. Patients ≥ 18 years with any gout diagnosis at discharge who had been admitted to public or private hospitals between 2005 and 2015 were included. Patients were divided in two periods: p1 (2005–2010) and p2 (2011–2015) to compare the number of hospitalizations, mean costs and mortality rates. Data from 192,037 patients with gout was analyzed. There was an increase in the number of hospitalized patients with gout (p < 0.001). The more frequent comorbidities were diabetes (27.6% of patients), kidney disease (26.6%) and heart failure (19.3%). Liver disease (OR 2.61), dementia (OR 2.13), cerebrovascular diseases (OR 1.57), heart failure (OR 1.41), and kidney disease (OR 1.34) were associated with a higher mortality risk. Women had a lower risk of mortality than men (OR 0.85). General mortality rates in these hospitalized patients progressively increased over the years (p < 0.001). In addition, costs gradually rose, presenting a significant increase in p2 even after adjusting for inflation (p = 0.001). A progressive increase in hospitalizations, mortality rates and cost in hospitalized patients with gout was observed. This harmful trend in a preventable illness highlights the need for change and the search for new healthcare strategies.

Introduction

Gout is a common form of inflammatory arthritis that leads to substantial morbidities and impairs patients’ quality of life. It is caused by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals within the joints and other tissues1, producing attacks with significant pain, with increasing evidence linking it to subclinical inflammation, cardiovascular risk and associated comorbidities2,3,4.

Today, monosodium urate crystal formation can be effectively avoided with urate-lowering therapy. However, the evidence indicates that this effective treatment is not provided for a majority of patients5. This lack of treatment effectiveness is most apparent in the number of patient hospitalizations due to gout attacks or comorbidities.

According to recent research, there is an increasing trend in the prevalence of gout in Western countries6. Thus, the prevalence of gout in the UK in 1991 had increased threefold compared with estimates from the 1970s7, and similar trends were confirmed in several more recent studies in other nations8,9. Although reasons for this are unknown, some risk factors, longer life expectancy and increased awareness of the disease among health professionals have been indicated as potential contributing factors10.

If this holds true, health services should develop strategies to improve the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. To determine the impact of gout during the last decade in our country, our main objective was to analyze the epidemiology, clinical features and costs of hospitalized patients with gout during the last decade in Spain.

Methods

Study population

Retrospective observational study based on data from the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) from the Spanish National Health Service database, which includes hospitalizations in the Spanish population.

The MBDS contains demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities and complications presented by patients, as well as the diagnostic techniques and surgical procedures employed during their hospitalization. Diagnoses are coded according to the International Classification of Diseases (9th Revision, Clinical Modification-ICD-9-CM), which allows for classifying the episodes into diagnostic-related groups (DRGs).

Data was requested from the Ministry of Health; specifically, access to the Discharge Hospital Registry of the MBDS for the pertinent information on patients ≥ 18 years with any gout diagnosis at discharge who had been admitted to public or private hospitals between 2005 and 2015. The requested data included the following diagnostic codes as a primary or secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9): 274.0: gout arthropathy. 274.00: gout arthropathy, unspecified. 274.01: Gout arthropathy, acute. Gout attack. Podagra. 274.02: Chronic gout arthropathy without tophi. 274.03: Chronic gout arthropathy with tophi/Chronic tophaceous gout. 274.1: Gout nephropathy. 274.10: Gout nephropathy, not specified. 274.11: Gout nephrolithiasis. 274.19: Other. 274.8: Gout with other specified manifestations. 274.81: Tophi on the ear. 274.82: Tophi on other sites. Tophi in the heart. 274.89: Gout with other manifestations. 274.9: Gout, non-specified.

Regarding the general inpatient population, we obtained data on the total number of discharges, the mean duration of the hospital stays, overall in-hospital mortality and costs for the entire population included in the MBDS.

Patients were divided in two periods of time: period 1 (p1), which comprises years 2005–2010; and period 2 (p2), including years 2011–2015. Total number of hospitalizations, mean costs and mortality rates were compared between both groups.

In addition, the presence of comorbidities such as diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), liver disease, dementia and kidney disease were identified by ICD-9 MC codes for the analysis of this study.

As a secondary objective, a sub-analysis of patients discharged with a main diagnosis of gout was also carried out.

Statistical analysis

The full cohort of patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of gout at discharge was analyzed. Mean and standard deviation were used for the description of continuous quantitative variables. Qualitative variables are described by absolute frequencies and relative frequencies are expressed as a percentage.

Comparisons between continuous quantitative variables were performed using the Student t-test for independent groups. The analysis of frequencies between qualitative variables was carried out using the Chi-squared test (χ2) or the exact Fisher test (if N < 20, or if any value in the table of expected values was less than 5).

In order to identify factors independently associated with mortality in these patients, a multivariate analysis was performed using forward stepwise logistic regression based on the improvement of the Likelihood Ratio (LR). The possible predictors were introduced as independent variables, including age, gender, diabetes, CHF, CVD, AMI, liver disease, dementia and kidney disease, and mortality as the dependent variable. The magnitude of its adjusted effect was expressed by the odds ratio and 95% of its confidence interval (CI).

SPSS software version 21 was used to analyze the data. Statistically significant differences were considered for an error probability of less than 5% (p < 0.05).

Results

The study cohort consisted of 192,037 patients with a discharge diagnosis of gout during the period 2005–2015, among the 40,397,139 total discharges during the same period in the National Health System. This means that the 0.48% of hospitalization discharges in our country presented gout among the discharge diagnosis; in 10,512 cases gout was the primary cause of the hospitalization, and in 181,525 cases it appeared as part of another diagnosis.

In the study population, 158,646 were males (82.6%) and total mean age at hospitalization was 72.1 ± 12.6 years. The number of hospitalizations, as assessed by discharge diagnosis, increased each year (Fig. 1). Concerning the outcome of the hospitalization, 91.6% (175,948) were discharged from hospital, 3.6% (6,870) were transferred to another center, and 4.3% (8,179) died. The average stay decreased during the time of the study from 11 days in 2005 to 8.9 days in 2015 (Table 1), which yielded statistically significant differences between p1 and p2 (p < 0.001).

Figure 1
figure1

(A) Number of hospitalizations by year in Spain. (B) Hospitalization rate per 10,000 hospitalizations by year in the MBDS.

Table 1 Mean hospital stays and in-hospital mortality for gout in Spain.

The main comorbidities in these patients were DM2 (27.6% of the study population), kidney disease (26.6%), CHF (19.3%), AMI (7.4%), CVD (6.7%), liver disease (2.7%) and dementia (1.4%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comorbidities associated in gout as main diagnosis and gout as any diagnosis.

Regarding mortality during hospitalization, the percentages progressively increased, reaching the highest rates in 2015 with 4.9% (Table 1), with statistically significant differences between p1 and p2 mortality rates (p < 0.001) The mean age of death was 77.3 years in males and 83.1 years in females (p < 0.01).

The multivariate analysis revealed factors associated with risk of mortality related to gout. Hence, in the study population, women had a lower risk of mortality (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80–0.90) than men, and older age was associated with a greater risk of mortality (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05–1.06). Other conditions that were associated with an increased mortality were: CVD (OR 1.57, CI 95% 1.46–1.49), CHF (OR: 1.41, CI 95% 1.34–1.49), liver disease (OR 2.61, CI 95% 2.34–2.9), kidney disease (OR 1.34, CI 95% 1.28–1.41) and dementia (OR 2.13, CI 95% 1.88–2.42). In the case of type DM2, a significantly lower risk of mortality was observed (OR 0.92, CI 95%, 0.87–0.96).

The average cost increased over time, with a minimum of 4,219 €/stay in 2005 and a maximum of 5,384 €/stay in the last year of analysis (Table 3). Mean costs per patient in p2 were higher than in p1 (5232.40 versus 4664.50, p = 0.02). Moreover, these costs are 9% higher than the mean cost for medical hospitalization in the MBDS. When adjusting for retail price index (RPI), these differences disappeared (p = 0.78). However, when comparing total costs per year (in millions of euros [€]), costs in p2 where significantly higher than p1 even after RPI adjustment (109,520 versus 77,050, p = 0.001).

Table 3 Annual costs of hospitalization in gout patients in Spain.

A continuous and linear annual increase in the number of patients with any discharge diagnosis of gout was observed from 2005 (12,851 patients) to 2015 (23,320), with a mean of 14,696 patients per year in p1 and 20,772 in p2 (p < 0.001).

Regarding gout as a primary diagnosis, among the 192,037 discharged patients, 10,512 met this condition in the whole period. Of these, 85.9% were male, and mean age at hospitalization was 65.4 ± 14.7 years. 4555 (43.4%) patients were at least 70 years old. By gender, mean age was 64.02 ± 14.43 years in males and 73.9 ± 13.69 years in females (p < 0.001). The main comorbidities in these patients were kidney disease (20.0%), DM2 (19.9%) and CHF (4.4%). Some other comorbidities that were investigated in these patients were: AMI (2.7%), CVD (3.2%), liver disease (1.4%) and dementia (0.8%). All these comorbidities were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in this group than in the group of any gout diagnosis. Among all patients with gout as primary diagnosis, 62.6% of males and 45.6% of women did not show any comorbidity (p < 0.05). 98.0% of patients (10,236) were discharged, 1.5% (156) were transferred to another center, and 0.5% (56) died. Considering mean age at death, there were no statistically significant differences in gender distribution in this group (males 76.58 ± 11.13 years and females 76.9 ± 13.8 years). The mean stay of these patients was 6.71 ± 6.8 days with an average cost of 3,471 ± 2,678€. Mean cost per patient and year of treatment in those patients with gout as primary diagnosis was higher in p2 than in p1 (3971€ versus 2983€, p < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Three specialties attended 80.6% of the patients with gout as main discharge diagnosis: Internal Medicine, with 3852 admissions (36.6%), Rheumatology, with 2600 (24.7%) and Orthopedics, with 2,033 (19.3%); the average number of patients per year was 350, 236 and 185, respectively. Mean length of stay of patients was shorter in Orthopedics, with a mean of 4.85 ± 6.78 days, followed by Rheumatology (6.52 ± 5.65) days and Internal Medicine (7.76 ± 6.83 days). The cost was lower in patients admitted by the Rheumatology service (Supplementary Table 1).

Multivariate analyses revealed factors associated with an increased risk of mortality in the group of gout as primary diagnosis: CHF (OR 3.39, CI 95% 1.74–6.63), AMI (OR 3.34, CI 95% 1.41–7.91), and older age (OR 1.06, CI 95% 1.03–1.08). Patients with gout as a primary diagnosis were younger (p < 0.05) and had less comorbidity than patients in the full study population (p < 0.05) (Table 2).

Discussion

This observational study collected data on patients discharged with a diagnosis of gout during 2005–2015 in hospitals of the Spanish National Health Service, and analyzed characteristics of their hospitalizations. There was a steady increase in the number of admissions with gout during the study period, with an annual increase of 5.4% over 10 years. These data are consistent with previous publications11,12. Rai et al. reported a twofold increase in gout hospitalizations from 2000 to 2011 in the Canadian population, doubling gout costs over the same study period13; this figure is similar to our results. This upward trend was not observed in the MBDS of Spanish national hospitalizations14. In addition, the average stay for hospitalized gouty patients was 9.7 days, which was higher (p < 0.01) than the average hospitalization for the general population (mean of 7.2 days for medical conditions during the same period)14. Analyzing this increase in the length of hospitalizations in gout patients, we hypothesize that the main contributing risk factors might be the presence of comorbidities, such as DM2 or kidney failure.

Our study reveals that in-patients with gout have a high burden of comorbidities. The comorbidities that showed stronger associations with gout were DM2 (27.6%), CHF (19.3%) and renal disease (26.6%). It is well known that these comorbidities produce an increase in the rates of morbidity and mortality, with a corresponding impact on the use of resources and their associated costs15. Certain components of metabolic syndrome and renal disease are associated with gout and gout duration16. Regarding DM2, its relationship with gout is more controversial; individuals with DM2 have a lower risk of developing gout, but patients with gout have an increased risk of developing diabetes17. Cardiovascular diseases have been widely described in patients with gout18, and there is growing experimental evidence that supports an effect of high concentrations of urate on endothelial dysfunction19. Regarding renal disease, it has been reported that 20% of adults with gout have chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 4 and above20. Interestingly, Singh et al. found that renal failure, heart failure, and diabetes were associated with a longer hospital stay for a hospitalization due to gout in a multivariable analysis21.

Regarding mortality, around 4–5% of the study patients with a diagnosis of gout died during their hospitalization. Mortality increased from 2005 to 2015 in both absolute and relative terms (4.1–4.9%, equating to a 0.8% increase), whereas mortality for any cause in the MBDS increased only 0.4% (3.3–3.7%)14. This lower death rate for other medical problems suggests that gout, with its higher risk of mortality, warrants the development of new health strategies to reverse this trend. This conclusion was reached in previous studies, notably a systematic review that encompassed seven long-term studies22. Lottmann et al. observed that the increased mortality risk in gouty patients was around 1.2–1.8 higher compared to those without gout. This risk was particularly true of patients with comorbidities. These results are similar to those presented in our study. It is also interesting that the mean age of death in patients with gout was lower than expected (77.3 years in males and 83.1 years in females), being significantly lower than that of general population (78.8 and 84.8 years for males and females, respectively, during the same period of time)14 (p < 0.01). This difference is especially pronounced in female gout patient subgroup with gout as the main discharge diagnosis, where the mean age at death of women was 76.9 years without difference with males and with difference of almost 6–8 years lower compared to the expected age of death in females the general population. This data highlights that we must pay special attention to female gout.

Studies on the costs of gout patient hospitalizations remain very scarce23. Our results showed an increase in crude costs per patient that disappeared when adjusted by the rate of inflation, probably due to reduction in the hospitalization average stage. However, since the number of gouty patients has risen, there has been a two-fold increase in costs even after adjusting for inflation.

An important strength of our study is its large population-based dataset, with over 10 years of follow-up; the MBDS provides an accurate compilation of all hospitalizations in our country. As shown in previous studies, the MBDS has proven to be reliable and valuable for descriptive and evaluative purposes24. Some limitations should be noted. Firstly, some data are not reported in the hospitalized patients in our cohort, such as treatment or blood test results that are not available in the MBDS. In addition, the study population included patients who were admitted to a hospital for any reason, when gout might have been the only comorbidity. Furthermore, costs are based on the average cost per hospitalized bed-day, which should be taken into consideration when assessing these data. Finally, the validity of gout as a discharge diagnosis in the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database has not been evaluated. However, Singh et al. found an accuracy of administrative codes with ICD-9 for gout that yielded 86% sensitivity (95% CI, 78%-96%), 95% specificity (95% CI, 91%-100%), 86% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value. They concluded that administrative codes can be used for health services outcomes research in gout25.

In conclusion, we observed a progressive increase in hospitalizations, cost and mortality rates in hospitalized patients with gout over the study period. This worrisome trend in a preventable illness highlights the need for change and the search for new healthcare strategies.

References

  1. 1.

    Harris, M.D., Siegel, L.B., Alloway, J.A. Gout and hyperuricemia. Am. Fam. Phys. 59, 925–934 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Choi, H.K., Curhan, G. Independent impact of gout on mortality and risk for coronary heart disease. Circulation 116, 894–900 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Krishnan, E., Baker, J.F., Furst, D.E., Schumacher, H.R. Gout and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. Arthritis Rheum. 54, 2688–2696 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Neogi, T., Hunter, D.J., Chaisson, C.E., Allensworth-Davies, D., Zhang, Y. Frequency and predictors of inappropriate management of recurrent gout attacks in a longitudinal study. J. Rheumatol. 33, 104–109 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roddy, E., Zhang, W., Doherty, M. Concordance of the management of chronic gout in a UK primary-care population with the EULAR gout recommendations. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 66, 1311–1315 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhu, Y., Pandya, B.J., Choi, H.K. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum. 63, 3136–3141 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Harris, C.M., Lloyd, D.C.E.F., Lewis, J. The prevalence and prophylaxis of gout in England. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 48, 1153–1158 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dehlin, M., Jacobsson, L., Roddy, E. Global epidemiology of gout: Prevalence, incidence, treatment patterns and risk factors. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16, 380–390 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Singh, G., Lingala, B., Mithal, A. Gout and hyperuricaemia in the USA: Prevalence and trends. Rheumatology (Oxford). 58, 2177–2180 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zobbe, K., Prieto-Alhambra, D., Cordtz, R., Højgaard, P., Hindrup, J.S., Kristensen, L.E., Dreyer, L. Secular trends in the incidence and prevalence of gout in Denmark from 1995 to 2015: A nationwide register-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 58, 836–839 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Blakey, G., Callear, J. Gout in primary care: Can we improve patient outcomes? Br. J. Gen. Pract. 6, u210130.w4918 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Robinson, P.C., Merriman, T.R., Herbison, P., Highton, J. Hospital admissions associated with gout and their comorbidities in New Zealand and England 1999–2009. Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 52, 118–126 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rai, S.K., Aviña-Zubieta, J.A., McCormick. N., de Vera, M.A., Lacaille, D., Sayre, E.C., et al. Trends in gout and rheumatoid arthritis hospitalizations in Canada from 2000 to 2011. Arthritis Care Res. 69, 758–762 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Msssi.gob.es [Internet]. Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social, MBDS [Conjunto Mínimo Básico Datos]. https://www.msssi.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/inforRecopilaciones/anaDesarrolloGDR.htm. (2016).

  15. 15.

    Elfishawi, M.M., Zleik, N., Kvrgic, Z., Michet, C.J., Crowson, C.S., Matteson, E.L., et al. The rising incidence of gout and the increasing burden of comorbidities: A population-based study over 20 years. J. Rheumatol. 45, 574–579 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bardin, T., Richette, P. Impact of comorbidities on gout and hyperuricaemia: An update on prevalence and treatment options. BMC Med. 15, 123 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pan, A., Teng, G.G., Yuan, J.M., Koh, W.P. Bidirectional association between diabetes and gout: The Singapore Chinese Health Study. Sci. Rep. 6, 25766 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Singh, J.A., Gaffo, A. Gout epidemiology and comorbidities. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 50, S11–S16 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mercuro, G., Vitale, C., Cerquetani, E., Zoncu, S., Deidda, M., Fini, M., Rosano, G.M. Effect of hyperuricemia upon endothelial function in patients at increased cardiovascular risk. Am. J. Cardiol. 94, 932–935 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Roughley, M., Sultan, A.A., Clarson, L., Muller, S., Whittle, R., Belcher, J., et al. Risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with gout and the impact of urate lowering therapy: A population-based cohort study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 20, 243 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Singh, J.A., Yu, S. Gout-related inpatient utilization: A study of predictors of outcomes and time trends. Arthritis Res. Ther. 18, 57 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lottmann, K., Chen, X., Schädlich, P.K. Association between gout and all-cause as well as cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 14, 195–203 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wu, E.Q., Forsythe, A., Guerin, A., Yu, A.P., Latremouille-Viau, D., Tsaneva, M. Comorbidity burden, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in chronic gout patients refractory to conventional urate-lowering therapy. Am. J. Ther. 19, e157–166 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Peña-Rey, I., Martínez de Aragón, M.V., Villaverde Hueso, A., et al. Epidemiología de la varicela en España en los períodos pre y post vacunación. Rev. Esp. Salud Pública 83, 711–724 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Singh, J.A. Veterans Affairs databases are accurate for gout-related health care utilization: A validation study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 15, R224 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) for the language editing.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each individual named as an author meets the journal’s criteria for authorship. Specifically, D.B., D.P., M.-Á.M.-H., and E.d.M. made substantial contributions to study conception and design, and to analysis and interpretation of data. M.H.-H. and A.B. made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to drafting the article and approved the final version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Benavent.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DB: Speaking fees Abbvie, Roche. DP: Speaking fees from AbbVie, Roche, and MSD and Grant/research support from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, and Roche. AB: Grant/research support: Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi. Consultant: Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly. Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly. EDM: Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant for: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Roche. No other disclosures relevant to this article were reported.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benavent, D., Peiteado, D., Martinez-Huedo, M.Á. et al. Healthcare-related impact of gout in hospitalized patients in Spain. Sci Rep 11, 13287 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92673-3

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing