Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Why heel spurs are traction spurs after all


It is unclear whether plantar and posterior heel spurs are truly pathological findings and whether they are stimulated by traction or compression forces. Previous histological investigations focused on either one of the two spur locations, thereby potentially overlooking common features that refer to a uniform developmental mechanism. In this study, 19 feet from 16 cadavers were X-ray scanned to preselect calcanei with either plantar or posterior spurs. Subsequently, seven plantar and posterior spurs were histologically assessed. Five spur-free Achilles tendon and three plantar fascia entheses served as controls. Plantar spurs were located either intra- or supra-fascial whereas all Achilles spurs were intra-fascial. Both spur types consistently presented a trabecular architecture without a particular pattern, fibrocartilage at the tendinous entheses and the orientation of the spur tips was in line with the course of the attached soft tissues. Spurs of both entities revealed tapered areas close to their bases with bulky tips. Achilles and plantar heel spurs seem to be non-pathological calcaneal exostoses, which are likely results of traction forces. Both spur types revealed commonalities such as their trabecular architecture or the tip direction in relation to the attached soft tissues. Morphologically, heel spurs seem poorly adapted to compressive loads.


Heel spurs describe bony outgrows of the calcaneus with plantar1 or posterior (“Achilles”)2 subtypes, defined by their respective location on the bone. Despite intense research on the topic, it remains unclear to date whether calcaneal spurs present pathological findings or non-pathological exostoses3. Plantar calcaneal spurs are more frequent when compared to posterior spurs with a prevalence of 32% and 13%, respectively4. Contrary to that, an analysis of calcanei from a prehistoric population revealed a higher incidence of posterior calcaneal spurs when compared to plantar ones with 25 and 3%, respectively5. This shows that plantar and posterior spurs are structural features of the foot for a long time of human history but their respective occurrence might be influenced by specific loading patterns. Prehistoric hunters and gatherers, which were presumably unshod likely had different foot biomechanics compared to today’s largely standing overweight and shod population5. An increasing incidence of both spur types with age is widely reported4,5,6,7, presenting evidence that spur development is a physiologically age-related adaption of the calcaneal entheses. It is unknown if plantar or posterior calcaneal spurs develop according to the same basic mechanisms. The hypothesis that calcaneal spurs develop due to soft tissue traction seems to be favoured for posterior spurs, however, this mechanism is increasingly questioned for plantar spurs2,8,9,10. For plantar spurs, it was hypothesised that they develop due to repetitive vertical calcaneus compressions when walking, rather than longitudinal soft tissue-related traction forces9,10. Presumably, the compression theory has not been suggested for posterior spurs, as a compressive loading of the Achilles tendon insertion during daily activities such as walking or standing seems unlikely. Wolff’s law11, which describes bony remodelling as a result of mechanical loading forms a basic assumption for both the compression and traction theory. According to previous studies that reported the bony architecture of mechano-compromised children in relation to healthy peers, mechanical loading can influence both the trabecular architecture as well as the surface of bones12. In summary, trabeculae that are oriented in line with the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia and/or spur growth in the direction of load application of the two soft tissues indicates that the spur results from traction forces. Previous histological studies on the fundamental morphological organization of heel spurs focused on either plantar13,14,15 or posterior2,16 spurs, deploying different methodologies. This impairs a direct comparison between these observations. Several authors have suggested considering the Achilles tendon, the calcaneus and the plantar fascia as a functional entity, and including the plantar region in the treatment of Achilles tendon pathologies and vice versa17,18,19,20,21. The former is supported by the finding that thick collagen fibres are connecting the Achilles tendon and the plantar fascia via the calcaneus in neonates, forming an apophyseal area, which is ossifying throughout life and leaves only the insertions of the soft tissues into the calcaneus18. This given study investigated and compared the histological characteristics of posterior calcaneal spurs, plantar calcaneal spurs, and spur-free controls. The spurs were histologically investigated with regards to trabecular orientation, tip direction in relation to the course of Achilles tendon and plantar fascia collagens and the location of the enthesis in relation to the spur. The following hypothesis was stated: plantar and posterior heel spurs are the result of soft tissue traction from a histological standpoint.


Specimen retrieval, X-ray imaging and histology

A total of 19 feet were retrieved from 16 human cadavers (7 ♀, 9 ♂; age at death 79 ± 14, age range 38 to 94 years) at the Department of Anatomy Dunedin, University of Otago, New Zealand. The feet were Crosado-embalmed22, which is a combined embalming fluid consisting of ethanol (60%), glycerine (15%), water (15%), phenoxytol (8%), and formalin (2%). Its usability for histological analyses was shown before22. The ten left and nine right feet were removed from the lower legs in cadavers approximately ten centimetres proximal to the talocrural joint. They were subsequently imaged using a digital lateral plain X-ray (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). Based on the X-rays, seven posterior spurs (Fig. 1) were retrieved with the adjacent soft tissues, decalcified in 10% EDTA, dehydrated, paraffin wax-embedded and serially sectioned at 10 μm. Seven plantar spurs (Fig. 2) using the same method. The histology slides were either Giemsa-stained to assess the cartilaginous entheses or silver-stained to evaluate the trabecular architecture and the course of the collagenous soft tissues23. Moreover, five Achilles tendon entheses and three plantar fascia entheses with no signs of spur formation were histologically assessed in the same manner serving as control specimens. The cadavers had no known medical history of inflammatory diseases, heel pain or osteoarthritis. None of the cadavers was obese, which was defined as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. The University of Otago Ethics Committee approved this study (approval number H17/20), in conjunction with Māori consultation being sought from the Ngai Tāhu Research Consultation Committee. The body donation for research purpose obtained informed consent from the donors or their legal representatives. All methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Figure 1

Different shapes of the posterior calcaneal surface are depicted on museum samples of the Department of Anatomy Dunedin, New Zealand. The upper row displays the superior (SF), middle (MF) and inferior facet (IF) of the posterior calcaneal surface in a posterior view. The posteriorly protruding spine separates the MF and the IF (coloured in red). The lower row shows the corresponding lateral view of the samples shown above. Red arrow, barely protruding spine; black arrow, protruding spine; white arrow, protruding spine with posterior spurs; a, anterior; i, inferior; l, lateral; m, medial; p, posterior; s, superior.

Figure 2

Different shapes of the plantar calcaneal surface are displayed on museum samples of the Department of Anatomy Dunedin, New Zealand. The upper row shows a plantar view of the calcaneus. The dotted lines indicate the base of the spurs. The lower row shows the corresponding medial view to of the samples shown above. a, anterior; i, inferior; l, lateral; m, medial; p, posterior; s, superior.

Data acquisition and analysis

OsiriX software (Pixmeo Sarl, Geneva, Switzerland) was used for the X-ray assessments. Histologically, the location of the plantar spurs was evaluated with regards to the insertion of the plantar fascia into the calcaneus using the silver stain. Similarly, the location of the posterior calcaneal spurs was noted with regards to the location of the Achilles tendon enthesis. Moreover, using the silver staining the presence of trabeculae, the trabecular orientation within all spurs as well as the direction that the tip of the calcaneal spur pointed to (in relation to the predominant collagen orientation of the Achilles tendon or plantar fascia) was evaluated. The presence of fibrocartilage on the outer surface and within the spur of both plantar and posterior calcaneal spurs was assessed using the Giemsa staining. The trabecular orientation was evaluated with the blunt eye under the microscope. Three categories were defined: (A) The trabeculae are strictly oriented along the axis of the Achilles tendon (for posterior spurs) or the plantar fascia (for plantar spurs). (B) The trabeculae are strictly oriented perpendicular to the aforementioned axes of the Achilles tendon or the plantar fascia. (C) The trabeculae lack a preferred orientation.


Spur-free calcaneal tuberosity

The Achilles tendon inserts into the middle facet of the calcaneal tuberosity that is covered with fibrocartilage (Fig. 3). The paratenon of the Achilles tendon continues its course beyond the protruding spine that separates the middle and inferior facets of the Achilles tendon (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

The spur-free protruding spine which separates the middle and inferior facet of the calcaneal tuberosity is shown in a sagittal section. (A) The insertion of the Achilles tendon (AT) is shown on a Giemsa-stained slice. Note the blue coloured fibrocartilage of the AT enthesis ending at the level of the spine. (B) The slice following the one in A was silver-stained. The dotted line indicates the posterior border of the AT until its lower insertion point, the black arrows show the paratenon of the AT continuing beyond the spine. a, anterior; Cal, calcaneus; i, inferior; p, posterior; s, superior.

Posterior calcaneal spurs

Posterior calcaneal spurs were noted exclusively in the area of the spine that separates the middle and inferior facets of the calcaneal tuberosity. Superficial collagen bundles of the Achilles tendon inserted into the posterior calcaneal spurs, forming a transition zone (Fig. 4). Fibrocartilage surrounded the entire spur in five cases and was limited to its anterior–superior part in two cases. Spur development in the distal area of the Achilles tendon attachment created a rim between the regular surface of the middle facet and the spur in all seven investigated posterior spurs of this study. All but one spur presented an island of fibrocartilage in the rim area. Fibrocartilage islands outside the rim were observed in the proximal posterior area in one spur and distal posterior area in another spur. All spurs presented an intrinsic trabecular orientation, which did not follow a particular pattern. All spur tips pointed in the direction of the preferred collagen orientation of the Achilles tendon. Sporadic chondrocytes were noted in two spurs, fibrocartilage islands within the spur were present in another two spurs. The enthesis of the Achilles tendon did not exceed the base of the spur distally. The paratenon of the Achilles tendon was running past all here investigated spurs (Fig. 4).

Figure 4

Posterior calcaneal spurs from four different donors are depicted on sagittal slices. (A) Giemsa staining. (B) The black arrows indicate the paratenon on a silver-stained slice. C) Note the blue chondrocytes at the insertion of the Achilles tendon (AT) into the calcaneus on this Giemsa staining. (D) Giemsa staining. a, anterior; Cal, Calcaneus; i, inferior; p, posterior; red arrows, tapered areas of the spur; s, superior.

Spur-free medial calcaneal processes

The plantar fascia inserted into the medial calcaneal process in two distinct layers, a superficial one originating from the posterior and posterior-inferior surface and a deeper layer originating from the anterior-inferior and anterior surface of the medial calcaneal process (Fig. 5). The two layers revealed no strict separation. The superficial layer revealed a longitudinal course of collagens whereas the deeper layers showed a steeper fibre orientation (Fig. 5).

Figure 5

A spur-free medial process of the calcaneus is depicted in a sagittal plane. (A) The plantar fascia inserts into the calcaneus. The enthesial cartilage is marked with a black arrow in this Giemsa stain. (B) The section in silver staining corresponding to A shows the longitudinal course of plantar fascia collagens, comprising of a superficial layer (SL) originating from the posterior and posterior-inferior aspect of the calcaneus. Plantar fascia collagens of the deeper layer (DL) insert in the anterior-inferior and anterior aspect of the calcaneus, demonstrating a different course of fibres compared to the superficial ones. a, anterior; i, inferior; p, posterior; s, superior.

Plantar calcaneal spurs of the medial calcaneal process

Plantar calcaneal spurs of the deep layer were either located within the fascia (n = 5) and entirely surrounded by an enthesis or superior to the former with an enthesis in their inferior and inferior-anterior areas (n = 2, Fig. 6). Both these spurs of the superficial plantar fascia layer were intra-fascial. Even though at least a thin cartilage layer was observed at the surface of each of the investigated spurs at a 40 × magnification, the entheses appeared to be more prominent in some parts of the spur without following a particular pattern (Fig. 6). All plantar calcaneal spurs contained trabeculae, which lacked a preferred orientation pattern. All tips of the plantar calcaneal spurs pointed in the direction of the predominant collagen orientation of the plantar fascia. Sporadic chondrocytes, as well as fibrocartilage islands, were observed in two of the investigated spurs, respectively. One spur was classified as irregular (Fig. 7), the remaining spurs were deemed simple with a triangular structure that tapered distally.

Figure 6

Plantar calcaneal spurs and their pre-stage are depicted from different donors in the sagittal plane. (A) A surface irregularity (white arrow), which does represent a developing plantar calcaneal spur is shown (Giemsa stain). The black dotted cross represents a matched dot in (C) and (E) for comparative reasons. (B) Silver staining corresponding to A with superficial (dotted black arrow) and deep (curved black arrow) collagen bundles, (C) A spur is present anterior to the estimated border of the calcaneus (red dotted line). (D) The silver staining corresponding to (C) indicates a different collagen orientation of the deep collagen bundles of the plantar fascia attaching to the spur (black curved arrow) when compared to the superficial collagens directed in a sagittal plane inserting posterior to the spur (black dotted arrow). (E) A calcaneal spur is shown with the Giemsa staining and corresponding (F) Silver stain. a, anterior; black asterisks (in E and F), flexor digitorum brevis muscle; curved black arrow, deep collagen bundles; dotted arrow, superficial collagens; p, posterior; i, inferior; s, superior.

Figure 7

A plantar calcaneal spur of the medial process is shown in a sagittal plane. (A) A Giemsa-stained medial slice of a plantar calcaneal spur is depicted with inferior (i) and anterior (a) plantar fascia insertion areas. The black arrow point at enthesial fibrocartilage. (B) The silver staining corresponding to (A) indicates a different collagen orientation of the plantar fascia attaching to the anterior region of the spur (black arrow) compared to the collagens directed in a sagittal plane inserting the posterior region of the spur (black dotted arrow). (C) Giemsa-stained slice located laterally to (A), (D) Silver-stained slice corresponding to (C); curved black arrow, deep collagen bundles; dotted arrow, superficial collagens, (E) Giemsa-stained slice located laterally to (C); red arrow, tapered area, (F) Silver-stained slice corresponding to (E); Black asterisks, flexor digitorum brevis muscle; curved black arrow, deep collagen bundles; dotted arrow, superficial collagens; s, superior; p, posterior.


Heel spurs likely develop as a result of recurring traction forces

The traction theory assumes that spur formation is a result of soft tissue traction acting on the calcaneus2. One proposed mechanism of spur formation involves subperiosteal bleeding that follows a periosteal detachment as a result of soft tissue traction on the enthesis24. Alternatively, the soft tissue traction might stimulate the growth of enthesial fibrocartilage, which then forms new bone through enchondral ossification2,24. All plantar and posterior calcaneal spurs in this given study contained enthesial fibrocartilage on their surface, supporting the latter hypothesis. This morphologically evidences the close relationship between the observed plantar and posterior spurs and the highly aligned collagenous tissues acting upon them, namely the Achilles tendon and the plantar fascia. The main findings of this study are summarised in Table 1 and highlight the morphological commonalities between plantar and posterior spurs, which can be taken as indicators for a common development mechanism of the two spur types.

Table 1 Overview of calcaneal spur characteristics and regular calcaneal features that can be mistaken for true spurs.

More specifically, based on the absence of a preferred trabecular pattern in this given study that formed the main argument for the compression theory of the development of plantar spurs9,10 and the observed morphological commonalities with posterior spurs, it is suggested that both spur types are stimulated by soft tissue traction, which was so far only accepted for posterior spurs16. This given study revealed that all posterior spurs were located within the Achilles tendon, whereas plantar spurs were located either within or superior to the plantar fascia. The latter most likely explains why the traction theory is intuitively accepted for posterior spurs but increasingly questioned for plantar ones. In this regard, two aspects should be pointed out: Firstly, all plantar spurs that were located superiorly to the plantar fascia revealed a fibrocartilage enthesis on their inferior and inferior-anterior surface. Therefore, these spurs reveal a close morphological relationship with the plantar fascia, which most likely stimulates their growth caused by traction forces. Secondly, this study highlighted the fact that spurs form complex three-dimensional structures, which were so far most commonly assessed using two-dimensional images both clinically3,4,7,19,25,26,27,28,29 and in research2,10,14,16. Hence, the enthesis of the plantar fascia in superiorly located spurs can easily be missed, leading to the assumption that the spurs do not develop as a result of external traction forces9,14. Alternatively, the traction forces could theoretically also be generated by the flexor digitorum brevis muscle, which is located anteriorly-superiorly adjacent to the plantar fascia spurs30. This is, however, opposed by the fact that the fibrocartilage entheses in this study were exclusively orientated towards the plantar fascia. A previous study of our group revealed a complex pattern of collagen bundle organization of the plantar fascia origin with fibres running in a medio-lateral fashion originating from the medial calcaneal process towards the lateral band of the plantar fascia21. These collagen bundles appear to be represented by a deep layer of the plantar fascia that was observed to take a different course compared to the superficial layer in this study. Collagen bundles of the superior layers were orientated in a longitudinal fashion running between the medial calcaneal process and the toes. Hence, when the plantar fascia is loaded, the collagen bundles that are attached to the calcaneus pull into different directions and, therefore, can cause complex three-dimensional spur shapes as shown in this study.

Morphological observations contradict spur formation due to compressive loading

The compression theory of calcaneal spur formation suggests that plantar spurs develop as a consequence of repetitive compressive loading through ground reaction forces causing microtrauma of the enthesis region9,14. It was suggested that the latter induces a periosteal reaction, inducing bone growth14. The compressive theory was derived from the observation of vertically aligned trabeculae within the spur9,14. It was assumed that the vertical orientation of the trabeculae develops as a result of a vertically orientated ground reaction force vector following Wolff’s law14. This given study using a critical qualitative assessment of the histological slides revealed that the trabeculae in both plantar and posterior spurs followed a complex pattern with no preferred or predictable orientation. In fact, the trabecular orientation was so far only assessed upon gross examination9,14 and quantitative analysis using a large sample size is missing to date. Moreover, previous research that favours the compression theory already observed that a vertical trabecular orientation is absent in some plantar spurs9. In summary, we conclude that solely based on the trabecular orientation within the spur there is no convincing evidence supporting neither the traction nor the compression theory. The strongest morphological evidence supporting the traction theory in this given study results from the fact that all spurs presented an enthesis of the Achilles tendon or the plantar fascia and additionally pointed into the direction of these tissues. Following the observation that all spurs contained plantar fascia entheses, it can be assumed that the plantar fascia considerably loads the spur whenever it is strained, e.g., during walking or standing. We suggest that the trabecular orientation of both plantar and posterior spurs is determined by the resultant force acting on the bone. This involves both ground reaction and pulling forces. This study revealed that both plantar and posterior spurs have a complex three-dimensional architecture such as tapered areas in the proximal spur part close to its base or spurs that taper towards their plantar side. Biomechanically, a tapered area close to the spur base with a bulky tip implies that some spurs are weaker closer to the base than in the distal tip area when compressively loaded. Moreover, the plantar tapering of some spurs contradicts the general anatomical observation that bones are wider in their weight-bearing surfaces, which is true for the epiphyses of all long bones. From our perspective, this observation opposes the idea that the spur forms as an adaption to compressive mechanical loads or the spur is considerably loaded compressively at all. In line with this theory, calcaneal spurs were noted as early as in a 9-month-old infant with a severe metatarsus varus deformity27. We suspect that spur formation in the former case was induced by tendinous pulling forces rather than compressive loads as infants will not extensively load their calcanei at this age. Posteriorly directed plantar spurs of the calcaneus were also noted incidentally in a 7-year-old boy with flexion deformities of the toes as well as a 3-year-old boy with a suspected fracture27.

All plantar and posterior spurs that were investigated in this given study presented a trabecular architecture indicating that the spur formation itself is very likely a non-pathological adaptation process to the forces acting on the superficial calcaneus instead of a pathological proliferative bone formation. However, after their adaptive formation, spurs might be overloaded easily given their location on the posterior and inferior calcaneus leading to secondary inflammatory changes, which can be seen in histology. Based on the aforementioned observations, it can be suggested that both plantar and posterior calcaneal spurs are traction spurs. Thus, the stated hypothesis can be accepted. These are most likely the results of increased traction forces or an altered force transmission on the calcaneal entheses that are related to age4,5,6,7 and body weight10,31,32,33. It is widely accepted that spur incidence increases with increasing age4,5,6,7. The biomechanical properties of human ligaments tend to show site-dependent changes in tissue elasticity with age34,35. While several studies investigated the relationship between age and elasticity of the human Achilles tendon with contradictory results36,37, the plantar fascia has just recently been mapped for such investigations21. Altered elastic properties of the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia will impact on their potential to store and release elastic potential energy38. Altered tendon biomechanics, irrespective of whether the tendon is too overly or soft, might lead to overloads on the tendinous entheses, which cause the development of spurs according to the abovementioned mechanisms described by Bergmann24 and Rufai2.

An age-related elasticity change of the plantar fascia and the Achilles tendon might alter their energy storage potential during walking or standing, which might stimulate the development of traction spurs on their calcaneal entheses. Similarly, this mechanism may apply to patients suffering from plantar fasciitis. Plantar fasciitis was shown to predominantly represent degeneration of the plantar fascia rather than an inflammation39. Higher spur incidences were observed in females younger than 50 years compared to males7. Frequent walking in high-heeled shoes was the suspected reason for this observed difference, which fits well with the favoured traction theory of this study. Dorsally extended toes in high-heeled shoes strengthen the plantar fascia and, therefore, likely produce traction forces at its calcaneal enthesis. The increased spur incidence of patients suffering from osteoarthritis can be attributed to an altered force-transmission on the calcaneal entheses due to a pathological gait pattern40. However, it should be emphasised that the evidence for an increased incidence of calcaneal spurs in patients with osteoarthritis is weak10 and some studies in this regard appear to be biased by older osteoarthritis cohorts compared to (younger) controls26,29. The incidence of calcaneal spurs has been shown to significantly increase with body weight10,31,32,33, which likely increases the applied loads to the longitudinal arch and, thus, the loads applied to the plantar fascia and its respective calcaneal enthesis. In line with Benjamin et al.16 it can be stated that increased pulling forces on the calcaneal entheses lead to the spur formation to increase the calcaneal attachment area of both the plantar fascia and the Achilles tendon. Regarding the proven correlation between body weight and spur incidence10,31,32,33, overweight should be avoided to limit spur formation in the first place. If spurs are truly stimulated by traction forces as concluded in this given study, higher weights likely cause increased traction forces on the calcaneal entheses, which is well conceivable as higher body weights lead to increased stresses on the plantar arches of the foot. However, a normal trabecular architecture within the spur indicates that spur formation is an adaptation of the bone to its biomechanical needs as outlined above. Hence, the main clinical implication might rather be to avoid overloading of the spurs due to their poor adaptation to compressive loading forces as indicated by tapered areas that represent notches as these form preferential failure points when loaded compressively. Heel spurs seem to be a non-pathological adaptation of a well-balanced load-transmission between the calcaneus and its surrounding soft tissues, which explains the comparatively high incidences in randomly chosen cohorts4,5,6,7. However, compressive overstimulation during daily activities might cause an inflammation of these exophytes, which led to the image that calcaneal spur formation is a pathological and painful process in the first place14.


This study is limited in sample size due to the fixed number of cadaveric specimens that were allocated to this project. Therefore, it has to be considered that the stated results might be biased by the limited sample size. The stated results might not apply to age cohorts that were not included in the age range of this study. It cannot be excluded that the embalming fluid and histological processing influenced the staining outcome of the histological sections or the here made radiographic observations.


Plantar and posterior heel spurs constitute non-pathological exostoses of the calcaneus. Histological analysis of both spur types revealed commonalities such as their trabecular architecture or the tip direction in relation to the attached soft tissues. Based on the morphological analyses it is suggested that both plantar and posterior spurs are the result of tissue traction. From a morpho-mechanical perspective, calcaneal spurs seem poorly adapted to compressive loads.


  1. 1.

    Plettner, P. Exostosen des Fersenbeins. Jahresbericht der Gesellschaft für Natur und Heilkunde in Dresden (1900).

  2. 2.

    Rufai, A., Ralphs, J. R. & Benjamin, M. Structure and histopathology of the insertional region of the human Achilles tendon. J. Orthop. Res. 13, 585–593. (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alatassi, R., Alajlan, A. & Almalki, T. Bizarre calcaneal spur: a case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 49, 37–39. (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Beytemur, O. & Oncu, M. The age dependent change in the incidence of calcaneal spur. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 52, 367–371. (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Weiss, E. Calcaneal spurs: examining etiology using prehistoric skeletal remains to understand present day heel pain. Foot (Edinb) 22, 125–129. (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Banadda, B. M., Gona, O., Vaz, R. & Ndlovu, D. M. Calcaneal spurs in a black African population. Foot Ankle 13, 352–354. (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Toumi, H. et al. Changes in prevalence of calcaneal spurs in men & women: a random population from a trauma clinic. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 15, 87. (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kirkpatrick, J., Yassaie, O. & Mirjalili, S. A. The plantar calcaneal spur: a review of anatomy, histology, etiology and key associations. J. Anat. 230, 743–751. (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kumai, T. & Benjamin, M. Heel spur formation and the subcalcaneal enthesis of the plantar fascia. J. Rheumatol. 29, 1957–1964 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Menz, H. B., Zammit, G. V., Landorf, K. B. & Munteanu, S. E. Plantar calcaneal spurs in older people: longitudinal traction or vertical compression?. J. Foot Ankle Res. 1, 7. (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wolff, J. The classic: on the theory of fracture healing. 1873. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468, 1052–1055. (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Robling, A. G. & Turner, C. H. Mechanical signaling for bone modeling and remodeling. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 19, 319–338. (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Abreu, M. R. et al. Plantar calcaneal enthesophytes: new observations regarding sites of origin based on radiographic, MR imaging, anatomic, and paleopathologic analysis. Skelet. Radiol. 32, 13–21. (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li, J. & Muehleman, C. Anatomic relationship of heel spur to surrounding soft tissues: greater variability than previously reported. Clin. Anat. 20, 950–955. (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Smith, S., Tinley, P., Gilheany, M., Grills, B. & Kingsford, A. The inferior calcaneal spur—anatomical and histological considerations. Foot 17, 25–31. (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Benjamin, M., Rufai, A. & Ralphs, J. R. The mechanism of formation of bony spurs (enthesophytes) in the achilles tendon. Arthritis Rheum. 43, 576–583.;2-A (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    De Palma, L., Coletti, V., Santucci, A. & Tuli, A. L“Embriogenesi del sistema Achilleo-calcaneo-plantare. Arch. Putti. Chir. Organi. Mov. 35, 135–141 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Snow, S. W., Bohne, W. H., DiCarlo, E. & Chang, V. K. Anatomy of the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia in relation to the calcaneus in various age groups. Foot Ankle Int. 16, 418–421. (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhu, G. et al. A radiographic study of biomechanical relationship between the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 5319640. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Singh, A., Zwirner, J., Templer, F., Kieser, D. & Hammer, N. On the morphological relations of the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia via the calcaneus: a cadaveric study. Sci Rep. (2021).

  21. 21.

    Zwirner, J., Zhang, M., Ondruschka, B., Akita, K. & Hammer, N. An ossifying bridge—on the structural continuity between the Achilles tendon and the plantar fascia. Sci. Rep. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Crosado, B. et al. Phenoxyethanol-based embalming for anatomy teaching: an 18 years’ experience with Crosado embalming at the University of Otago in New Zealand. Anat. Sci. Educ. (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Romeis, B. Romeis—Mikroskopische Technik (Springer Spektrum, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bergmann, J. N. History and mechanical control of heel spur pain. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 7, 243–259 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tountas, A. A. & Fornasier, V. L. Operative treatment of subcalcaneal pain. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gerster, J. C., Vischer, T. L., Bennani, A. & Fallet, G. H. The painful heel. Comparative study in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Reiter’s syndrome, and generalized osteoarthrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 36, 343–348. (1977).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Robinson, H. M. Symmetrical reversed plantar calcaneal spurs in children. A normal variant?. Radiology 119, 187–188. (1976).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vulcano, E., Mani, S. B., Do, H., Bohne, W. H. & Ellis, S. J. Association of Achilles tendinopathy and plantar spurs. Orthopedics 37, e897-901. (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bassiouni, M. Incidence of calcaneal spurs in osteo-arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis, and in control patients. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 24, 490–493. (1965).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    McCarthy, D. J. & Gorecki, G. E. The anatomical basis of inferior calcaneal lesions. A cryomicrotomy study. J. Am. Podiatry Assoc. 69, 527–536. (1979).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Duvries, H. L. Heel spur (calcaneal spur). AMA Arch. Surg. 74, 536–542. (1957).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rubin, G. & Witten, M. Plantar calcaneal spurs. Am. J. Orthop. 5, 38–41 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sadat-Ali, M. Plantar fasciitis/calcaneal spur among security forces personnel. Mil. Med. 163, 56–57 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zwirner, J., Scholze, M., Waddell, J. N., Ondruschka, B. & Hammer, N. Mechanical properties of human dura mater in tension—an analysis at an age range of 2 to 94 years. Sci. Rep. (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zwirner, J., Ondruschka, B., Scholze, M. & Hammer, N. Mechanical properties of native and acellular temporal muscle fascia for surgical reconstruction and computational modelling purposes. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 108, 103833 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Delabastita, T., Bogaerts, S. & Vanwanseele, B. Age-related changes in Achilles tendon stiffness and impact on functional activities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Aging Phys. Act (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wakker, J., Kratzer, W., Graeter, T. & Schmidberger, J. Elasticity standard values of the Achilles tendon assessed with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography on healthy volunteers: a cross section study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 19, 139. (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Petrovic, M. et al. Altered Achilles tendon function during walking in people with diabetic neuropathy: implications for metabolic energy saving. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985(124), 1333–1340. (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lemont, H., Ammirati, K. M. & Usen, N. Plantar fasciitis: a degenerative process (fasciosis) without inflammation. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 93, 234–237. (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Hu, K. & Liu, Y. Characteristics of plantar loads during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Med. Sci. Monit. 23, 5714–5719. (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Author information




All authors substantially contributed to the conception and design of this study. A.S., F.T. and N.H. performed the histology. J.Z, A.S. and N.H. analyzed the data. J.Z. drafted the first version of the manuscript. All authors critically revised and approved the manuscript for submission. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Johann Zwirner or Niels Hammer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zwirner, J., Singh, A., Templer, F. et al. Why heel spurs are traction spurs after all. Sci Rep 11, 13291 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing