Introduction

B cell-activating factor (BAFF, also known as B-lymphocyte stimulator or BlyS) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) are cytokines expressed by antigen-presenting cells that play a crucial role in the development of B-lymphocytes1,2,3,4. BAFF receptor (BAFF-R) is the major mediator of BAFF-dependent costimulatory responses in circulating peripheral B-lymphocytes5, essential for its survival and maturation. Several pieces of evidence revealed that BAFF, APRIL and BAFF-R are molecules also involved in autoimmunity6,7,8. In this regard, an influence of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR polymorphisms was observed on several immune-mediated conditions9,10,11, being BAFF GCTGT>A a shared insertion-deletion variant for multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rheumatoid arthritis9,12.

Immunoglobulin-A vasculitis (IgAV), formerly called Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP), is an inflammatory small-sized blood vessel disease, more common in children and rarer but more serious in adults13,14,15. The classic clinical triad of IgAV consists of palpable purpura, arthralgias/arthritis and gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement. Renal manifestations are also common in affected patients and constitutes the most serious complication of the disease16,17,18. IgA1-predominant immune deposits in the vessel walls are the defining pathophysiologic feature of IgAV13, supporting the hypothesis that this vasculitis is predominantly a B-lymphocyte mediated disease. Furthermore, IgAV has a multifactorial aetiology in which genes play a relevant role in both the predisposition and severity of the disease19,20,21.

Taken all these considerations into account, this study aimed to determine, for the first time, whether BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR represents novel genetic risk factors for the pathogenesis of IgAV. For this purpose, BAFF rs374039502 polymorphism, which colocalizes with the BAFF GCTGT>A insertion-deletion variant mentioned above, and two tag polymorphisms within APRIL (rs11552708 and rs6608) and BAFFR (rs7290134 and rs77874543), which cover most of the variability of both genes, were genotyped in the largest series of Caucasian patients diagnosed with IgAV ever assessed for genetic studies.

Patients and methods

Study population

A series of 386 unrelated Spanish patients of European ancestry who fulfilled both Michel et al.22 and the American College of Rheumatology23 classification criteria for IgAV-HSP were included in the present study. Centres involved in the recruitment of these patients included Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla (Santander), Hospital Universitario San Cecilio (Granada), Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge (Barcelona), Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (Lugo), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (Oviedo), Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa and Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (Madrid), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Sevilla) and Hospital Universitario de Basurto (Bilbao). Information on the main clinical features of these patients is shown in Table 1. For GI manifestations, bowel angina was considered present if there was diffuse abdominal pain that worsened after meals, or bowel ischemia usually with bloody diarrhoea. GI bleeding was defined as the presence of melena, haematochezia, or a positive test for occult blood in the stool. Renal manifestations were defined to be present if at least one of the following findings was observed: haematuria, proteinuria, or nephrotic syndrome at any time over the clinical course of the disease and/or renal sequelae (persistent renal involvement) at last follow-up. With regard to treatment, glucocorticoids were used in patients with severe GI and/or renal manifestations. Mycophenolate or azathioprine were added to glucocorticoids in refractory patients. Cyclophosphamide and plasma exchange were required in two patients due to life-threatening manifestations.

Table 1 Main clinical features of the 386 patients with IgAV included in the study.

In addition, a set of 806 sex and ethnically matched healthy controls without history of cutaneous vasculitis or any other autoimmune disease, constituted by blood donors from Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla (Santander) and National DNA Bank Repository (Salamanca), was also included in this study.

For experiments involving humans and the use of human blood samples, all the methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations, according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committees of Cantabria (for Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander), Ethics Committee of clinical research of Granada (for Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada), Ethics Committee of clinical research of Barcelona (for Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona), Ethics Committee of clinical research of Galicia (for Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo), Ethics Committee of clinical research of Asturias (for Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo), Ethics Committee of clinical research of Madrid (for Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa and Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid), Ethics Committee of clinical research of Sevilla (for Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla) and Ethics Committee of clinical research of Euskadi (for Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao). Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms selection and genotyping methods

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from all the individuals was extracted from peripheral blood using REALPURE `SSS´ kit (RBME04, REAL, Durviz S.L., Spain).

Patients with IgAV and healthy controls were genotyped for the BAFF rs374039502 single nucleotide polymorphism using a custom TaqMan assay (ID: AH0JGPG) with the following primers: forward 5′-GACAGCATCCCGGTTTTCATTTTAT-3′ and reverse 5′-TGTAAACTGTTAAATGAAGTAAACAGTTAAAACTGA-3′. In addition, all individuals recruited in this study were genotyped for two tag genetic variants within APRIL (rs11552708 and rs6608) and two tag polymorphisms within BAFFR (rs7290134 and rs77874543), using predesigned TaqMan assays (C_25630192_20 for rs11552708, C_247220_20 for rs6608, C_2189968_1_ for rs7290134 and C_102764384_20 for rs77874543). Tagging of APRIL and BAFFR was performed using data from the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.internationalgenome.org/) and the Haploview v4.2 software (http://broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview), and considering the r2 threshold set at 0.8 and minimum minor allele frequency at 0.05. The linkage disequilibrium pattern of the APRIL and BAFFR polymorphisms analysed in this study is shown as Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 2 online, respectively.

Genotyping was performed in a QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time polymerase chain reaction system, according to the conditions recommended by the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

Negative controls and duplicate samples were included to check the accuracy of the genotyping.

Statistical analyses

All genotype data were checked for deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE).

Differences in genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR as well as differences in haplotype frequencies of APRIL and BAFFR were evaluated between patients with IgAV and healthy controls and between patients with IgAV stratified according to specific clinical characteristics of the disease (age at disease onset or presence/absence of GI or renal manifestations).

First, comparisons were performed considering each BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR polymorphism independently. Both genotype and allele frequencies were calculated and compared between the groups mentioned above by chi-square or Fisher tests when necessary (expected values below 5). Strength of association was estimated using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Subsequently, allelic combinations (haplotypes) of both APRIL and BAFFR polymorphisms were carried out. Haplotype frequencies were calculated by the Haploview v4.2 software (http://broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview) and then compared between the groups mentioned above by chi-square or Fisher tests. Strength of association was estimated by OR and 95% CI.

P-values lower than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

All analyses were performed with the STATA statistical software 12/SE (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

Results

The genotyping success rate for each polymorphism evaluated in this study was 99.4% for BAFF rs374039502 and APRIL rs11552708, 99.6% for APRIL rs6608, 99.7% for BAFFR rs7290134 and 99.3% for BAFFR rs77874543.

No evidence of departure from HWE was observed at the 5% significance level.

Genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR variants were similar to those reported for populations of European origin in the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.internationalgenome.org/).

Differences in genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR between patients with IgAV and healthy controls

Firstly, we compared genotype and allele frequencies of each BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR variant assessed independently between patients with IgAV and healthy controls.

As shown in Table 2, no statistically significant differences in BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR frequencies were disclosed when patients with IgAV were compared to healthy controls.

Table 2 Genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR in patients with IgAV and healthy controls.

Differences in genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR between patients with IgAV stratified according to specific clinical characteristics of the disease

Subsequently, we compared genotype and allele frequencies of each BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR variant assessed independently between patients with IgAV stratified according to specific clinical characteristics of the disease.

Since IgAV is often a benign and self-limited pathology in children and a more severe condition in adults, we analysed potential differences in genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR between patients with IgAV stratified according to the age at disease onset. However, no statistically significant differences in BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR frequencies were detected when children (age ≤ 20 years) were compared to adults (age > 20 years) (Table 3).

Table 3 Genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR in patients with IgAV stratified according to specific clinical characteristics of the disease.

We also examined whether differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR could exist between patients with IgAV stratified according to the presence/absence of GI or renal manifestations. Accordingly, no statistically significant differences in BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR frequencies were found between patients with IgAV with or without GI manifestations (Table 3). This was also the case when patients with IgAV who developed renal manifestations were compared to those who did not exhibit these complications (Table 3).

Haplotype analyses of APRIL and BAFFR

Moreover, we compared haplotype frequencies of both APRIL and BAFFR between patients with IgAV and healthy controls as well as between patients with IgAV stratified according to the specific clinical characteristics of the disease mentioned above.

The haplotype analysis of APRIL and BAFFR did not yield additional information since haplotypes frequencies of both genes were similar in patients with IgAV when compared to healthy controls (Table 4). In addition, no statistically significant differences in APRIL and BAFFR haplotype frequencies were disclosed when patients with IgAV were stratified according to the age at disease onset or to the presence/absence of GI or renal manifestations (Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Table S3 online).

Table 4 Haplotype analysis of APRIL and BAFFR between patients with IgAV and healthy controls.

Discussion

Inflammatory diseases are pathologies that share common pathogenic molecular mechanisms24,25. With this respect, cumulative knowledge clearly suggest that BAFF, APRIL and BAFF-R are key molecules involved in the development of B-lymphocytes1,2,3,4,5, that also play a relevant role in the pathogenic processes underlying immune-mediated disorders6,7,8.

Taking into account these considerations, we aimed to determine whether BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR represent novel genetic risk factors for the pathogenesis of IgAV, a predominantly B-lymphocyte inflammatory leukocytoclastic vasculitis. For that purpose, we analysed a BAFF genetic variant (rs374039502), which colocalizes with the BAFF GCTGT>A insertion/deletion variant previously described as a common locus for the susceptibility to several autoimmune diseases9,12, in the largest series of Caucasian patients diagnosed with IgAV ever assessed for genetic studies. Interestingly, this functional BAFF variant is an insertion-deletion in which five nucleotides are replaced by one (GCTGT>A), being this A the risk allele that creates a shorter 3´ UTR transcript, lacking a microRNA binding site, leading to higher levels of soluble BAFF, which in turn up-regulates humoral immunity9. Additionally, we also assessed two tag variants within APRIL and BAFFR, which cover most of the variability of both genes, in our cohort of patients with IgAV. Our results showed no influence of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR on the susceptibility to IgAV. Since an association between different genetic variants and an increased risk of nephritis or GI disease was disclosed in IgAV26,27,28,29, we also evaluated whether BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR may be related to the increased risk of nephritis or GI complications in our patients with IgAV. However, data derived from our study do not support a role of BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR polymorphisms (assessed independently or combined conforming haplotypes) in the phenotype expression of IgAV, indicating that these genes do not represent risk factors for the severity of the disease.

A previous genetic study evaluated the potential involvement of BAFF rs374039502 on the susceptibility to and clinical expression of giant cell arteritis (GCA), another primary systemic vasculitis that, unlike IgAV, involves large and middle-sized blood vessels30. Additionally, the role of this polymorphism on the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) was analysed in that study30. Nevertheless, and in keeping with our data, a lack of association of BAFF rs374039502 with the susceptibility and severity of GCA and SSc were reported by the authors30.

In summary, based on a large series of Caucasian patients, our results suggest that BAFF, APRIL and BAFFR genes do not contribute to the genetic network underlying IgAV.