Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Disruption of the odorant coreceptor Orco impairs foraging and host finding behaviors in the New World screwworm fly

Abstract

The evolution of obligate ectoparasitism in blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) has intrigued scientists for over a century, and surprisingly, the genetics underlying this lifestyle remain largely unknown. Blowflies use odors to locate food and oviposition sites; therefore, olfaction might have played a central role in niche specialization within the group. In insects, the coreceptor Orco is a required partner for all odorant receptors (ORs), a major gene family involved in olfactory-evoked behaviors. Hence, we characterized the Orco gene in the New World screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax, a blowfly that is an obligate ectoparasite of warm-blooded animals. In contrast, most of the closely related blowflies are scavengers that lay their eggs on dead animals. We show that the screwworm Orco orthologue (ChomOrco) is highly conserved within Diptera, showing signals of strong purifying selection. Expression of ChomOrco is broadly detectable in chemosensory appendages, and is related to morphological, developmental, and behavioral aspects of the screwworm biology. We used CRISPR/Cas9 to disrupt ChomOrco and evaluate the consequences of losing the OR function on screwworm behavior. In two-choice assays, Orco mutants displayed an impaired response to floral-like and animal host-associated odors, suggesting that OR-mediated olfaction is involved in foraging and host-seeking behaviors in C. hominivorax. These results broaden our understanding of the chemoreception basis of niche occupancy by blowflies.

Introduction

Identifying the genomic changes underlying adaptation in living organisms is a fundamental goal of modern evolutionary biology. In the context of insect evolution, the emergence of parasitic lineages offers a unique opportunity to investigate the genetic basis of adaptive traits driving species to occupy novel ecological niches. As noted by Grimaldi and Engel (2005), “Calyptratae flies have redefined the ‘art’ of vertebrate parasitism, particularly the Oestroidea […]1”, a superfamily that includes blowflies, botflies, fleshflies and relatives. Within Oestroidea, the family Calliphoridae is of particular interest due to its synanthropic habits. Commonly known as blowflies, the members of this family are frequently found foraging on plant inflorescence, where they feed on nectar2, as well as breeding on decaying organic matter and carcasses3. Therefore, blowflies have important roles in nature as pollinators and as recyclers of organic waste. In addition, they also have a remarkable importance in forensics3, veterinary4, and medical sciences5,6. Although better known for these necro-saprophagous flies, the group spans an even greater diversity of life-history strategies, including many forms of parasitism (examples are given by7). In particular, the evolution of obligate ectoparasitism is one of the most outstanding events within Calliphoridae, which has intrigued entomologists and evolutionary biologists over decades7,8,9,10,11. Estimations of the divergence timescale support that this lifestyle arose recently and independently at least twice after the explosive radiation of blowflies about 22 million years (Ma) ago, having a free-living scavenger ancestor7,10,12,13. The diversification of grazing mammals during this period is thought to have created a favorable landscape for their rapid speciation10, which might have been followed by intense competition for ephemeral carrion resources. This harsh condition may have initially favored opportunistic blowflies attracted by decaying flesh in the surface of animal’s wounds to oviposit, ultimately leading to the evolution of obligate ectoparasite lineages14. However, while these studies have addressed the likely origins of obligate ectoparasitism in blowflies, there have been relatively few attempts at understanding the genetic basis underlying this lifestyle.

Here, we hypothesized that olfactory chemoreception may have played a critical role in the adaptive transition from a necro-saprophagous to an obligate ectoparasitic habit in blowflies. Olfaction is a core chemosensory process in sensory perception, and divergences in olfaction-related genes are known to contribute to premating isolation, speciation and niche adaptation in insects15,16. We adopted the New World screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Coquerel 1858), as our research model. The screwworm is the sole obligate ectoparasite among the Cochliomyia genus, which includes four endemic species to the Americas, in addition to nearly all of the closely related blowflies, which are primarily carrion feeders10,17. Adult screwworms feed on flower nectar while their larvae feed on the live tissues of animals. Gravid female screwworms rely on odors emitted from wounded warm-blooded vertebrates to find suitable hosts for oviposition4,18,19, and lay their eggs on the dried margins of wounds and bodily orifices of their selected animal hosts. After hatching, the larvae infest and consume the animal living tissues to complete their development. These traumatic infestations are known as myiasis, which can lead to death if untreated5. The devastating effects of this species on wildlife and livestock encouraged a decades-long eradication campaign, using the sterile insect technique (SIT), that successfully eliminated screwworms from North and Central America20. At present, millions of radiated-sterile screwworms are released daily along the Panama‐Colombia border. This barrier zone prevents and counter-strike C. hominivorax outbreaks, as recently seen in the United States21, from regions where the species remains endemic. Meanwhile, screwworms remain a serious problem for animal health in South America5,22. Because of its well-established phylogenetic status, its consequences as a destructive invasive pest, and the increasing availability of genomic resources23,24, C. hominivorax represents a promising model to address the genetic basis of niche occupancy in blowflies.

In insects, the sense of odors in complex environments is mediated by several chemosensory genes expressed in porous sensilla attached to olfactory organs, including the antennae and maxillary palps25. Inside the sensilla, odors are solubilized and shuttled through the inner lymph to receptor sites present in the olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs). Two distinct receptor families, named ionotropic receptor (IR) and odorant receptor (OR), are responsible for recognizing the intercepted signals, resulting in the activation of OSNs and a cascade of neural events leading to a multitude of behavioral responses16,25,26,27,28. Although the OR and IR gene families include a large number of members (for instance, 60 and 66 genes in Drosophila melanogaster, respectively29) the proper function of all divergent ORs is dependent on a common odorant receptor coreceptor, named Orco27,30,31. A failure to encode Orco results in abnormal behaviors driven by OR-mediated olfaction, while maintaining other chemosensory pathways intact32,33,34,35,36,37. In this context, an Orco knockout strain of C. hominivorax would provide a simple system to rapidly differentiate olfactory behaviors mediated by the OR and IR families in this species. In this study, we isolated the Orco orthologue of C. hominivorax (named ChomOrco), characterized its sequence in a phylogenetic context, and assessed its developmental and tissue expression patterns. We next expanded our previous CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing protocols23 to develop a germline Orco null strain, and evaluated the contribution of OR-mediated olfaction in foraging and host-seeking behaviors in C. hominivorax. The data presented here provides new functional evidence on the chemoreception basis of ecological specialization in the screwworm fly.

Results

The screwworm Orco orthologue is highly conserved within Diptera

Classic-RACE was used to isolate the full-length Orco transcript sequence of C. hominivorax, which consists of 1437 base pairs (bp) encoding a 478 amino-acid (aa) peptide sequence. The ChomOrco transcript shares 73 and 92% of nucleotide identity with Orco sequences from D. melanogaster and the closely related Oriental latrine blowfly, Chrysomya megacephala, respectively. In addition, the ChomOrco coding sequence shows an extremely high aa identity with all dipterans investigated in this study (mean ± SD: 92 ± 5.5%; Supplementary Table S1). Based on its transcript sequence, we next used a combination of bioinformatics genome-wide analysis and long-range PCR sequencing to isolate the complete 12,870 bp genomic region corresponding to the Orco gene in screwworm. Genomic organization of ChomOrco is characterized by the presence of seven exons, highly conserved among dipterans, separated by six introns (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. S1). Differently from D. melanogaster (DmelOrco), the exon 2 of screwworm Orco is subdivided into two parts (referenced here as E2a and E2b) separated by a 74 bp intronic region (named I1b). We further investigated the presence of intron I1b in other species and found that this region is not unique to the C. hominivorax genome, but rather has an ancient origin of at least ca. 50 Ma within the Schizophora clade, presumably being shared by all Calyptratae flies (Supplementary Fig. S1). Membrane protein topology predictions indicated that ChomOrco contains seven transmembrane domains (TM), an inverted terminal membrane topology (Nin-Cout) and a conserved tyrosine residue at TM7 (Fig. 1B), all signatures of this atypical OR coreceptor27,38. Most conserved residues were found at TM6 and TM7, which is thought to be a region where ORs partially interact with Orco. As evidenced in other calyptrates39, ChomOrco is eight amino acids (309NGGGGNGL316) shorter than Drosophila at the intracellular loop 2 (IC2), which connects the TM4 and TM5, a region believed to be important for intracellular transport27. The long IC2, in comparison with the conventional ORs, is another Orco feature31,40 and this region appears to be a common place for Orco length variations in dipteran species (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Screwworm Orco orthologue is highly conserved within diptera. (A) Comparison between the Orco genomic organization in D. melanogaster (DmelOrco) and C. hominivorax (ChomOrco). Exons are represented by numbered black boxes (E1-E6) and introns as connecting lines (I1-I5). The seven transmembrane domains (TM1-TM7), conserved tyrosine residue at TM7 (Y), and nucleotide length variation at E3 (gray strip) are also represented (dipteran’s Orco sequence alignment is shown in Supplementary Fig. S1). (B) Predicted protein topology of ChomOrco displaying significant characterized sites by Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB). (C) Maximum Likelihood (ML) reconstruction of relationships between dipteran Orco sequences (species and accessions used can be found in Supplementary Table S3). Bootstrap support values, estimated from 500 non-parametric replications, are shown at their respective nodes. Normalized non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitution rates (ω) were estimated to test the branches leading to C. hominivorax (in green) and D. suzukii (in blue) species for events of episodic diversification. The number of sites estimated to be evolving under purifying (K0), relaxed (K1), and positive (K2a or K2b) selection is shown for these lineages (foreground branch; ωfrg) in relation to the rest of the tree (background branch; ωbkg).

Gene tree inferences recovered ChomOrco in the Calliphoridae clade sharing a common node with Orco sequences of Muscidae species. The clade composed of Calliphoridae + Muscidae forms a sister-clade with Drosophilidae or Tephritidae families (Fig. 1C), consistently reflecting the phylogenetic relationships among the Schizophora clade10. We investigated the branch leading to C. hominivorax species for site-specific signatures of episodic diversification, as positive selection pressures are likely to affect only a few sites within a specific lineage. Results revealed that the selective pressures in the screwworm lineage do not differ from the background tree, presenting signals of a strong purifying regime (ωK0 = 0.025) in the majority of the corresponding aa sites (97.3%), while remaining sites showed evidence of relaxed constraint (ωK1 1; Fig. 1B,C). Only a single site (211threonine, located inside TM4) exhibited some signal of positive selection in the Cochliomyia clade (ωfrg ≥ 1, while ωbkg < 1), although it was not statistically significant (BEB score: 0.92). Thus, it’s likely that this site is rather experiencing a relaxation of selective constraints in this clade. The same evolutionary signatures were obtained when testing the branch leading to Drosophila suzukii lineage (DsuzOrco; Fig. 1C), illustrating that the Orco sequence conservation reflects its indispensable role in olfaction across taxa.

Expression of Orco is conserved among blowflies and broadly detected in chemosensory-related tissues of C. hominivorax adults

We investigated the relative expression of Orco during screwworm development by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Results revealed that Orco transcription takes place during the final stages of embryogenesis (12 h after oviposition when eggs are incubated at 37 ± 2 °C), and its expression is maintained at similar levels during the first instar larvae stage (Fig. 2A). The ChomOrco expression decreases in the subsequent larval development, reaching the lowest levels in the third larval stage. The pupal stage is characterized by a gradual increase in Orco transcript abundance over time (3-to-8-days after pupation; Fig. 2A), reaching its highest level during the pre-imago development (8-days after pupation). Upon dissection (Fig. 2B; Supplementary Methods), it was possible to verify that the full development of the adult form and their main olfactory appendages occurs in this last pupal stage, which is synchronized with ChomOrco expression. In the adult stage, the ChomOrco transcription reaches its highest level. These observations are consistent with the idea that Orco expression follows the transition from a primordial larvae sensory system to more complex structures in adults30, also suggesting that olfaction plays a major role in the adult life stage of the screwworm fly. A similar developmental expression of Orco was observed in the blowfly C. megacephala (Fig. 2C) by semi-quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), suggesting that the regulation of Orco expression is conserved in closely related blowflies.

Figure 2
figure 2

Expression of Orco is conserved among blowflies and broadly detected in chemosensory-related tissues of C. hominivorax adults. (A) Relative expression of ChomOrco during the screwworm development by qPCR. Measurements are given by the quantification of ChomOrco normalized to GAPDH using the 2−ΔCt method and presented as fold-change relative to the third instar larvae using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Cycle thresholds above 35 were considered non-detected (nd). (B) Intrapuparial development of C. hominivorax at three (3d), six (6d), and eight days (8d) after pupation. A closer view of the head region (white square) reveals the fully developed sensory structures of the adult form present in the late pupae stage. (C) Semi-quantitative comparison between developmental Orco expression in C. hominivorax (Chom) and C. megacephala (Cmeg) species by RT-PCR. (D) Detection of ChomOrco in adult screwworm female (♀) and male (♂) tissues. For all RT-PCR assays: Amplifications were made in replicates (n = 3), including no template controls (ntc), and GAPDH was amplified as an internal control. Cropped images (delineated by black lines) are from samples run on different gels. Full-length gels are displayed in Supplementary Fig. S2. (E) The main olfactory structures of C. hominivorax viewed under electron microscopy. (panel a) Screwworm female's head highlighting the antennae (ant), and the maxillary palps (mp). (panel b) A closer view of the proximal surface of the third antenna segment reveals a number of tricoide (tri), basiconic (bas), and two morphotypes of coelonic (coe) sensilla (panel c), named grooved (gro) and clavate (cla). These morphotypes are adorned with multi-wall pores (single arrows) and grooves (double arrows), which presumably facilitate the entrance of odor molecules into the antennae.

In insects, Orco is expressed in nearly all of the olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs30). Therefore, it was foreseen that ChomOrco would be mainly detected in olfactory-related tissues of C. hominivorax adults. Indeed, semi-quantitative amplifications revealed that ChomOrco is highly expressed in the main olfactory appendages of both sexes in the screwworm fly, including the antennae and the maxillary palps (Fig. 2D). Screwworm’s antennae are subdivided into three segments: the scape, pedicel and funiculus. The former accommodates a thin and plumose arista, as seen in Fig. 2E (panel a). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Supplementary Methods) of the female's head revealed that C. hominivorax funiculus is predominantly adorned by three classes of sensilla: coelonic, tricoide and basiconic (Fig. 2E; panel b). A close view of the proximal portion of this segment exposed a number of other two morphotypes of coeloconic sensilla, named grooved and clavate41, lying in deep bristle pits (Fig. 2E; panel c). These subclasses of sensilla are characterized by the presence of grooves and multiple wall-pores, which presumably allows the entry of molecules able to stimulate the chemoreception system located inside the antennae. Thus, the high level of ChomOrco transcription in the antennae is correlated to the morphology of this appendage. In addition to classic olfactory organs, a considerable abundance of Orco transcripts was also detected in legs and abdomen of both sexes, and in the female ovipositor (Fig. 2D), implying that these tissues may also have chemosensory roles in C. hominivorax.

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing efficiently generated ChomOrco null germline mutants

The evolutionary conservation of the Orco gene among dipterans might be translated into a conserved molecular function, suggesting that ChomOrco is required for normal OR-mediated olfaction in C. hominivorax. To test this assumption, we knocked out ChomOrco using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing protocols we recently optimized for screwworm23. Initially, we tested in vivo two single guide RNAs (sgRNAs), targeting exons 1 (sgR-Orco-E1) and 2b (sgR-Orco-E2b) of the ChomOrco gene (Fig. 3A). Microinjections of pre-assembled ribonucleoproteins (RNPs), supplemented with a fluorescent protein-expressing plasmid, were performed in a small number of screwworm embryos (n ~ 100). Hatching fluorescent larvae (Supplementary Fig. S3) were examined for the presence of indels by T7 endonuclease 1 assays (T7E1), and induced genome modifications were quantified by Illumina sequencing (Supplementary Methods). Although both designed sgRNAs were found active, sgR-Orco-E1 outperformed sgR-Orco-E2b in induced mutagenesis (Fig. 3B,C). Indeed, microinjections with multiplexed sgRNAs poorly generated large deletion events between the targeted regions (Supplementary Fig. S4), most likely due to efficiency differences between designed sgRNAs.

Figure 3
figure 3

Knockout of ChomOrco by CRISPR/Cas9 induce complete loss of Orco protein in screwworm. (A) Schematic of the Cas9-targeted regions of ChomOrco and sgRNAs tested. Targeted sites are indicated by a scissor, PAM motif in red, and genotyping primers as blue arrows. Band migration patterns expected after T7E1 and dual-targeting assays are indicated below. (B,C) In vivo evaluation of sgR-Orco-E1 and sgR-Orco-E2b, respectively. A small number of surviving larvae (n = 6) were collected and genotyped by T7E1 (leftmost). PCR amplifications spanning targeted sites were pooled, Illumina sequenced, and genome modifications quantified using CRISPResso (rightmost chart). A diversity of allele variations is shown in Supplementary Fig. S3. Cropped images (delineated by black lines) of PCRs and T7E1 experiments are from samples run on the same gels (one for each experiment). Full-length gels are displayed in Supplementary Fig. S5. wt = wildtype sample; NTC = no template control; Ldd = 100 bp DNA Ladder (NEB). (D) Crossing scheme used to develop Orco mutant strains. Briefly, G0 flies were genotyped by T7E1, and mosaic males (Orcom) backcrossed to wt females (Orcowt). Heterozygous individuals (Orcowt/?) at G1 were genotyped by sequencing, and siblings harboring a − 16 bp mutation inbred at G2. Heterozygous (Orcowt/16) and homozygous (Orco16) flies at G3 were identified by in vitro Cas9-assay (Supplementary Fig. S8) and inbred to establish the heterozygous (OR16ko) and homozygous (ChomOrco16) strains. (E) Sequencing confirmation of the mutant genotypes in comparison with the wt allele. (F) Immunostaining of antennae sections from wt (above) and ChomOrco16 (KO, below) flies, showing cell nuclei (DAPI) and Orco protein (OR83b-IC3) localization within cell body (white arrows) and dendrites (black arrows) of screwworm’ OSNs. As in control slides (Supplementary Fig. S9), mutant flies display undetectable levels of Orco protein.

Based on these initial results, new microinjections were carried out with sgR-Orco-E1 (n = 750). Out of the 329 hatching larvae (larvae surviving rate: 44%), a total of 154 showed expression of the co-injected fluorescent protein marker gene (putative microinjection success: 47%). Marked larvae were collected and reared until adulthood, and 28 healthy adults were obtained (adult surviving rate: 18%), including 12 males and 16 females. Only surviving G0 males were kept for backcrossing, as a high level of sterility has been previously observed for females developed from microinjections23. Non-lethal DNA extractions (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. S6) were used as templates for T7E1 genotyping, which revealed that all selected males harbored indels at the ChomOrco loci. Figure 3D summarizes the crossings and genotyping results obtained from this point. Ten males were randomly selected and individually backcrossed to virgin wild-type (wt) females to examine their founder capabilities. From each crossing, eight male-offspring (on average) were randomly sampled and genotyped as before. Out of the ten selected G0 putative founders, nine produced heterozygous G1 offspring (transmission efficiency: 90%) at percentages ranging from 14 to 89% (Supplementary Table S2), revealing germline Cas9-induced inheritable mutagenesis. Nine G1 heterozygous males (one per obtained line) were selected and individually backcrossed to wt females for a second time. Simultaneously, genotyping by sequencing was carried out, and resulting chromatograms were examined using the CRISP-ID application42 to access the allele variants harbored by each selected G1 male. In total, six mutated alleles were recovered, including three variants that disrupted the open reading frame of ChomOrco, and thus were expected to result in a non-functional Orco protein. Among them, siblings at G2 from a line harboring a − 16 bp deletion were selected and inbred. The − 16 bp mutation was chosen based on the likelihood of functional consequences, and due to the possibility of a simpler genotyping approach (Supplementary Fig. S7).

Finally, homozygous mutants were identified at G3 by in vitro Cas9-assay (Supplementary Fig. S8). Out of 96 genotyped G3 adults, 49 (51%) were heterozygous for the − 16 bp mutation (ChomOrco16/wt), 19 (20%) were wt (ChomOrcowt), and 28 (29%) were homozygous mutants (ChomOrco16), roughly as expected by the Mendelian inheritance ratio of genotypes (X2 = 0.4, p = 0.52, d.f = 1). Genotypes were confirmed by sequencing (Fig. 3E), and homozygous mutants inbred to establish a strain at G4. The ChomOrco16 mutants were evaluated for the loss of Orco protein expression by immunostaining. Polyclonal antibody IC327 against the third intracellular loop of Orco labeled the OSNs cell body and dendrites inside the sensilla of wt flies’ antennae (Fig. 3F, above), while no labeling was detected in mutant flies (Fig. 3F, below). As in control slides (Supplementary Fig. S9), antennae sections of ChomOrco16 individuals lack detectable levels of Orco protein, confirming their knockout genotype.

Disruption of Orco impairs foraging and host-seeking behaviors in C. hominivorax

Homozygous ChomOrco16 mutants do not exhibit any visible phenotype or locomotion disabilities, and they are fertile. However, we observed a clear reduction in overall fitness relative to the wt flies. The knockout strain was weak and difficult to rear in culture. Although these characteristics make screwworm Orco mutants unhandy for long-term rearing—for instance, the ChomOrco16 colony was maintained for eight inbreeding generations before collapsing—the heterozygous strain is as healthy as the wt, allowing to preserve the mutant allele in laboratory conditions. These observations indicate that ChomOrco might have a great impact in multiple traits of screwworm.

We tested whether the mutation introduced in ChomOrco would translate into altered odor-guided behaviors in the screwworm by using two-choice trap assays (Fig. 4A,B), focusing on the adult foraging and host-seeking behaviors, as they are central for C. hominivorax ectoparasitic habit. Screwworm adults spend most of their time resting and feeding on flowering vegetation43. Nectar and pollen have a great impact on their survival, ovary maturation and reproductive success44. Hence, we tested the consequences of Orco disruption on the attractiveness of C. hominivorax male and female flies (3-to-4-day-old unmated and fasted flies) to honey (odor bait) or glycerol (control). As in other systems32, honey was used as an odor cue that resembles floral nectar. Control trials showed that wt flies don’t display preferences to cage sides, and they are not attracted to control baits (Supplementary Fig. S10). We found that as in ablated “antennaless” flies, screwworm Orco mutants exhibit no attraction to honey (attraction index (AI)16 = 0.01 ± 0.02, mean ± SEM), while heterozygous and wt flies showed a considerable preference for this nutritional source (Fig. 4C; AIwt = 0.53 ± 0.03). In insects, members of the OR family are highly tuned to fruity ester and alcohol-derived smells29. Therefore, these results suggest that the disruption of ChomOrco most likely compromised the function of the C. hominivorax odorant receptors genes.

Figure 4
figure 4

Disruption of ChomOrco impairs foraging and host-seeking behaviors in screwworm. (A) Representation of the two-choice trap assay arena. Odor (yellow mist) and control traps are offered to groups of flies at opposite sides of the cage. Groups of 15–25 flies (fasted adults of 3-to-4-days-old, sex ratio about 1:1) were tested in foraging trials, while groups of 10–20 flies (fed, matted females of 6-to-9-days-old) were tested in oviposition assays. Attraction experiments were made in replicates (n = 8 to 12; dots in C,D). (B) Details of the trap model used in two-choice assays (see also Supplementary Methods). (C) Honey odors resemble floral nectar, an important nutritional source for screwworm in nature. Orco mutants (Orco16; n = 11) lost attraction to honey, as ablated flies (n = 9), while wildtype (Orcowt; n = 12) and heterozygous (Orcowt/16; n = 12) flies remain strongly attracted. (D) Screwworm females are stimulated to lay eggs on spent larval media in rearing conditions. This bait releases a volatile blend similar to the one found in screwworm-infested wounds. Orco mutants (n = 8) have severely reduced attraction to the oviposition media when compared to wt (n = 10) and heterozygous (n = 8) flies (Supplementary Movie S1). Similar response was observed for ablated flies (n = 9). The results illustrate that OR-mediated olfaction is necessary for foraging and host-seeking behaviors in C. hominivorax. Bars indicate mean ± SD. Genotypes marked with different letters denote significant deviations of attraction index as given by the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test with continuity correction (significant at p-value < 0.001).

In nature, screwworm females are preferentially attracted by odors released from pre-existing screwworm-infested wounds4,45,46, as these sites are rich in bacterial-derived semiochemicals that act as animal host-finding cues in complex environments18,19. This blend of odors can be obtained from waste larval rearing media, which is routinely offered to C. hominivorax females to stimulate oviposition in laboratory colonies47. In order to evaluate the implications of an impaired OR-olfactory pathway for the recognition of its favored oviposition site, the ability of post-mated C. hominivorax female flies (6-to-9-days-old) to find oviposition media was evaluated in an additional set of two-choice trap assays. We observed that wt and heterozygous females display a strong attraction to the odors released from the oviposition device (Fig. 4D), entering the odor traps just a few minutes after the beginning of the trials and very often laying eggs inside before the end. In contrast, ChomOrco16 mutants showed drastically reduced attraction to the oviposition media (Wilcoxon test against wt: W = 80, p < 0.001), exhibiting a lack of decision-making and impaired flight orientation towards the stimuli source (Fig. 4D and Supplementary Movie S1). Comparable behaviors were observed for “antennaless” females. These outcomes demonstrate that Orco is required for normal host-seeking behavior in C. hominivorax and suggest that the perception of wound-derived odors by screwworm females relies, at least in part, on OR-mediated olfaction.

Discussion

The emergence of the obligate ectoparasitic lifestyle in blowflies is a fascinating biological problem, which has been challenging scientists for over a century7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Surprisingly, few studies attempted to uncover the genetic basis of adaptive traits in this diverse group of flies. Since blowflies rely on odors to seek for oviposition sites, we hypothesized that changes in the olfactory system played a central role in the evolution of a free-living to a parasitic habit within the group. We adopted C. hominivorax as a model to expand our knowledge on the olfactory-driven behaviors in parasitic blowflies and focused our research on the characterization of the Orco gene, a required companion of all ORs. The ChomOrco is highly conserved within Diptera (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. S1, and Supplementary Table S1), as a reflection of a strong purifying selection regime (Fig. 1B,C). Same signatures of sequence evolution were found in the distantly related species D. suzukii (Fig. 1C), an invasive phytophagous fruit fly. These observations indicate that other more divergent genes, rather than Orco, are responsible for the unique olfactory landscape of C. hominivorax. In fact, the functional conservation of Orco across ca. 290 Ma of insect evolution was illustrated by Jones et al.48. By using transgenic constructs, the authors demonstrated the feasibility of using Orco orthologs from close and distantly related species to rescue functional defects in Orco mutants of Drosophila, clearly demonstrating the critical importance of this gene for insect olfaction.

Nevertheless, the evaluation of ChomOrco expression allows us to speculate on the contribution of olfaction to many aspects of screwworm biology. Quantitative analysis indicated that the olfactory system changes drastically throughout development in C. hominivorax (Fig. 2A). Orco transcription appears at the last hours of embryogenesis, persisting during the first larvae stage. Screwworm larvae survival depends on proper host selection made by the mothers, which prefer to lay eggs on dry borders of animal wounds and bodily orifices46. This decision prevents the embryos from drowning in body fluids while ensuring hatching larvae immediate access to a nutrient-rich environment. Newborn larvae might use olfactory cues to guide their way from the oviposition site into the substrate to feed. Once the feeding source is found, this olfactory-based orientation might be gradually replaced by contact chemoreception, such as gustatory, explaining the decrease in ChomOrco expression during subsequent larval stages (Fig. 2A). A similar pattern is observed in other blowflies, such as Lucilia sericata49 and C. megacephala (Fig. 2C), indicating that the modulation of Orco expression is also evolutionary conserved. Interestingly, food ingestion by D. melanogaster is enhanced in the presence of microorganism-derived odors50. Thus, a reduction in olfactory input might be related to the lower rates of larval survival observed for the Orco mutant strain developed in this study.

The relatively low expression of Orco during larval stages also reflects their morphologically simple olfactory system51. In fact, ChomOrco expression appears to be in synchrony with the morphogenesis of the adult peripheral olfactory system (Fig. 2A,B). The correlation between structure and function, in this case, is illustrated by the high expression of ChomOrco in the antennae and maxillary palps of both sexes (Fig. 2D,E). Olfaction is indispensable for C. hominivorax adulthood, in particular to locate susceptible animals for oviposition43,52, 53. Animal host-finding and selection by screwworms can be separated in three scalable steps, from initial activation to orientation, and landing, culminating in the final decision of egg-laying. As gravid screwworms approach putative animal hosts, visual cues encourage the selection of landing sites, and other systems such as tactile, gustatory, and thermal contribute to generating enough stimuli for the egg-laying decision53. As in other Calyptratae flies39,49, Orco transcription is detected in screwworm legs and abdomen of both sexes, and in the female ovipositor (Fig. 2D), suggesting that ChomOrco has a broader chemosensory role in C. hominivorax. Additionally, these appendages are likely to harbor unknown olfactory structures in the screwworm, as widely described in other species39,54,55,56, which in females would enhance the acquisition of short-range and contact stimuli required for oviposition45,52. Indeed, we noticed that Orco mutants invest considerably more time examining oviposition devices in comparison to wt flies, often laying smaller batches of eggs, presumably due to their chemoreception disabilities.

Odors emitted from wounded animals are perceived by gravid screwworm females through receptors located in the antennae, which are responsible for eliciting flight orientation towards putative animal hosts18,19,52,53. This was first demonstrated by Devaney et al.52, which found that the removal of screwworm females’ antennae is enough to disrupt their host-seeking behavior. This finding was subsequently confirmed by olfactometer assays57, and corroborated by the characterization of screwworm’s antennae ultrastructures41. Here, we present a further step in dissecting the behavioral responses mediated through olfactory receptor families in screwworm, by developing a germline Orco null strain of C. hominivorax using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing (Fig. 3). Without Orco, the correct localization of all ORs is compromised, preventing the OR-signaling while maintaining other chemosensory pathways unharmed26,27,29,30. This knockout system allowed us to evaluate the contribution of OR and IR olfactory receptor families on C. hominivorax foraging and host-seeking behaviors using two-choice trap assays (Fig. 4A,B). While wt and heterozygous flies are highly attracted to both honey and oviposition devices, the disruption of Orco in screwworm resulted in a lack of decision-making and impaired flight-orientation, suggesting they were unable to perceive either smell (Fig. 4C,D, and Supplementary Movie S1). Furthermore, experiments with ablated individuals revealed that other chemosensory appendages do not compensate for the absence of the antennae to elicit flight-orientation towards these odors. The consequences of Orco disruption on specific traits have been described in a number of non-classical model insects, including social behavior in ants34, conspecific recognition in locust58, foraging and mating in moths33,35,59, human host-seeking in mosquito32, and oviposition in the spotted wing Drosophila37. Together, these studies unlock the major role of the OR gene family on insect evolution. Likewise, our results demonstrate that OR-mediated olfaction is required, at least in part, for normal screwworm host-seeking behavior, by inducing flight-orientation towards animal host-derived odors. They further illustrate one of many potential roles that Orco and ORs play in the ectoparasitism habit of the screwworm fly. Consequently, changes in the OR-olfactory pathway are expected to have contributed to shaping the ecological niche preference in the C. hominivorax lineage during blowfly evolution.

In the past decade, there has been great progress in the development of genomic tools supporting investigations on screwworm biology, including transcriptome sequencing60,61,62, molecular tools enabling gene silencing, editing and engineering23,63,64, and more recently the first reference genome assembly24. Together with this increasing availability of genomic resources, the results presented here set the stage for a broader investigation focusing on the genetics underlying specific traits in screwworm. It will be possible, for example, to search for signatures of diversifying selection on chemosensory gene families and evaluate their expression profiles at contrasting C. hominivorax physiological states. Supporting this idea, a recent study65 found that screwworm females and males exhibit very distinct antennal expression profiles, including many genes encoding for ORs. The study shows that at least one OR displaying a female-biased expression might have a role in the screwworm oviposition behavior. The ChomOr19 gene, as named by the authors, is an ortholog to the DmelOr7a; an OR related to aggregation and egg-laying decision in D. melanogaster66. Functional analysis of ChomOr19 and other genes of interest will benefit from our CRISPR/Cas9 methods developed for screwworm, allowing us to investigate their contribution to the different life strategies adopted by blowflies. From an applied perspective, these efforts may assist in the identification of novel targets for alternative genetic strategies aiming to interfere with specific screwworm behaviors, in addition to the discovery of new environmentally safe semiochemicals to be used in integrated pest management programs67. We have just begun a deep dive into the genetic basis of niche specialization in C. hominivorax, a species that is on its way to become a compelling model organism to study the link between chemoperception evolution and the emergence of novel ecological adaptations in the Calliphoridae family.

Methods

Flies

The C. hominivorax wt strain J06 was used in this study. The strain is routinely reared in the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) laboratory, located inside the Commission for the Eradication and Prevention of Screwworms (COPEG) biosecurity plant in Panama, under conditions previously described63. Samples of Cochliomyia macellaria and C. megacephala were obtained from the frozen tissue collection of the Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil.

RNA and cDNA

Specimens were collected from colonies, while specific tissues were dissected from 3-days-old adult flies fasted for 12 h. Samples were rinsed with 0.1% DEPC-treated water and immediately homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Total RNA was isolated according to manufacturer’s instructions. All extractions were DNase-treated in a 20 µl reaction containing 4 U of TURBO DNase (Invitrogen), 20 U of RiboLock RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Scientific), 1X Reaction Buffer and 10 µg of total RNA. Treatments were performed at 37 °C for 30 min and stopped by the addition of 15 mM of EDTA (pH 8.0) followed by an incubation at 75 °C for 10 min. To ensure complete digestion of genomic DNA, a total of 1 µg of each RNA preparation was visualized in a 1% denaturing agarose gel (1X MOPS, 2% formaldehyde) post-stained with Ethidium Bromide (EtBr; 0.5 µg/ml). Samples were previously mixed with 2X volume of Gel Loading Buffer II (Invitrogen), denatured at 65 °C for 20 min, and let cool down in ice for 5 min before gel applications. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized from 2 µg of DNase-treated RNA using the SuperScript II (Invitrogen) protocol with the Oligo(dT)12–18 primer (Invitrogen). Reverse transcriptions were performed at 42 °C for 1 h, terminated at 70 °C for 15 min, and stored at − 20 °C.

RACE and genomic region

Specification for all primers used in this study can be found in Supplementary Table S4. First strand cDNA was used as template for the amplification of a 660 bp region of Orco transcripts from C. hominivorax (ChomOrco) and C. macellaria (CmacOrco; used as a control in this study) in a 50 µl PCR reaction containing 0.2 µM of each Orco-F1 and Orco-R1 primers, 80 µM of dNTPs, 10% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA at 5 mg/ml), 1X Taq buffer supplied with 1.5 mM of MgCl2 and 1.25 U of recombinant Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). Amplifications were carried out in the following conditions: 95 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles of [95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 60 s], and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen), directly TA cloned into a pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega) and sequenced in a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using the universal primers M13-Forward and M13-Reverse. Obtained sequences were used to design specific inner primers. Classic rapid amplification of cDNA ends (Classic-RACE) was performed as described by Scotto–Lavino et al.68,69 with minor modifications described in Supplementary Methods. The resulting ChomOrco transcript was mapped against the C. hominivorax genome (GenBank: GCA_004302925.1) using tBLASTn, and exon–intron boundaries predicted using exonerate70. The resultant genomic map was used to design specific primers for long-range PCRs (long-PCR), which were carried out to fill sequence gaps and validate complex regions through Long-PCR Product Sequencing (LoPPs) method71 (Supplementary Material). Previously assembled ChomOrco transcript was used to anchor LoPPs reads during the final assembling with CAP372.

Evolutionary analysis

Selected Diptera Orco sequences (Supplementary Table S3) were codon-aligned using the Muscle algorithm implemented in MEGA X73. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method was used to estimate uncorrected distances (p-distance; Supplementary Table S1). Maximum-likelihood (ML) reconstructions were made in RAxML v.874 using the PROTGAMMA model and JTT substitution matrix for the amino acid alignment. Node supports were assessed by 500 non-parametric bootstrap replicates. The clade Aedes aegypti + Anopheles gambiae was defined as the outgroup. Adaptive evolution was tested using CodeML implemented in PAML475. Normalized non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitution rates (ω) were estimated using branch-site models to detect events of episodic selection on amino acid sites at specific lineages (foreground branches). Likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) were performed between the alternative model bsA (positive selection) and the null model bsA1 (neutral). Significance of LRT results were determined by chi-squared (χ2) testes, and Bayes Empirical Bayes analysis (BEB) was used to infer amino acid sites under selection regime (cutoff ≥ 0.95). Consensus locations of transmembrane domains (TM) within ChomOrco were predicted by TOPCONS76, and significantly characterized sites were mapped onto the predicted protein topology as modeled in Protter77.

Expression

Evaluation of ChomOrco expression was conducted by Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR). First-strand fivefold diluted cDNAs (equivalent to 50 ng of DNAse-treated RNA template, as determined by 1:5 serial dilution standard curve analysis) were used as templates in 12.5 µl amplification reactions containing 6.25 µl of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and 0.4 µM of each Orco-F2 and Orco-R2 primer (Supplementary Table S4). Runs were performed in a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) according to the following protocol: hold at 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of [95 °C for 15 s and 62 °C for 60 s]. Amplification efficiency was evaluated by standard curve method, and melting curves were assessed to ensure unique product amplification (Supplementary Fig. S11). Data were analyzed with automatic threshold and baseline settings. The expression levels of ChomOrco during the screwworm development were normalized to Gapdh78 using the 2-ΔCt method, and presented as fold-change relative to the third instar larvae using the 2-ΔΔCt method79. Cycle thresholds above 35 were considered undetected. Independent biological (n = 3) and technical (n = 3) replicates were carried out for each experiment, in addition to no template controls (NTC, cDNA omitted from the reaction and volume adjusted with nuclease-free water). Tissue-specific semi-quantitative amplifications were made with primers Orco-F3 and Orco-R1 (Supplementary Table S4) in replicates (n = 3) through Reverse Transcription PCR (RT-PCR). First strand cDNAs were used as templates in 25 µl PCRs as previously described, and amplifications were resolved in 1X TAE (40 mM Tris–acetate, 1 mM EDTA) 2% agarose gels post-stained with GelRed (GLPBIO). Gel images were acquired in a L-PIX EX transilluminator (Loccus Biotecnologia) using pre-defined setups in the software L-Pix Image v.2.7. Cropping, contrast and light corrections were made in the same software.

CRISPR/Cas9

CRISPR experiments were performed as previously described23. Single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed by examining ChomOrco exons for the presence of protospacer-adjacent motifs (PAMs, sequence NGG-3’, where “N” is any base) using the standalone version of CRISPOR tool80 in the context of C. hominivorax genome (GenBank: GCA_004302925.1). The sgRNAs were synthesized as described by Bassett and Liu81, with minor modifications23, while purified recombinant Cas9 protein was obtained commercially (PNA Bio). Ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) were pre-assembled by incubating Cas9 protein (500 ng/µl) with specific sgRNA (200 ng/µl) in a Sodium Phosphate Buffer (supplied with 300 mM of KCl) at 37 °C for 10 min. For multiplexed experiments, RNPs were pre-assembled separately and 1:1 mixed prior to the microinjections. The plasmid pB[Lchsp83-ZsGreen]82 was added to the final injection cocktail (300 ng/µl), which was maintained on ice during the experiments. Microinjections were performed at the posterior end of pre-blastoderm screwworm embryos within the first 45 min of embryogenesis.

Orco mutant strain

After microinjections, all G0 larvae transiently expressing the ZsGreen marker were selected and raised to adulthood. Non-lethal DNA extractions (Supplementary Fig. S6 and Supplementary Methods) were performed for G0 adult flies and used as templates for PCR amplifications spanning the targeted site at ChomOrco exon 1. Amplifications were submitted to T7E1 cleavage assays, as previously described23, and ten mosaic males were individually backcrossed to wt females (1 Cas9 G0 ♂ × 4 wt ♀). On average, eight G1 adult males from each crossing were randomly selected and genotyped as before. Nine heterozygous G1 males (one per obtained mutant line) were selected and individually backcrossed to wt females for a second time, while simultaneously genotyped by Sanger sequencing and CRISP-ID analysis42. Adult G2 male and female flies harboring a − 16 bp deletion were identified by T7E1 and let to interbreed freely in cages. Homozygous mutants at G3 were identified by in vitro Cas9-assay, using the Guide-it Genotype Confirmation Kit (Takara), and inbred to establish the Orco mutant strain at G4. Further genotyping, when required, was conducted using our custom High Resolution Mobility analysis (HRMob, described in Supplementary Fig. S7).

Immunostaining

Antennae were dissected from females and directly frozen in O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Tissue-Tek) at − 20 °C. Cryosections were made in a Leica CM1850 at a thickness of 18 µm, and thaw-mounted on gelatin-coated microscope slides. Slides were air-dried at room temperature for 10 min, submerged in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 0.05% Azide for 5 min, and blocked in PBS with 0.2% Triton X and 3% Bovine Serum Albumin (PBSTB) for 1 h. Sections were incubated with anti-Or83b (peptide HWYDGSEEAKT, described in27) rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:100 in PBSTB) overnight at 4 °C in a humid chamber. Slides were washed for a total of 15 min in PBST (5 min per wash) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 488 secondary antibody (Life Technologies, diluted 1:500 in PBSTB). Slides were washed as before, with the addition of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) during the last wash, mounted using the Vectashield medium (Vector Labs), and sealed with nail polish. Stained antennae sections were imaged on a Leica TCS SP5 II confocal microscopy at the Life Sciences Core Facility (LaCTAD), located at UNICAMP. The wt and mutant samples were mounted in the same slides and imaged under the same settings. No signal was detected in the absence of primary or secondary antibodies (Supplementary Fig. S9).

Behavior

For the foraging assays, unmated adult flies of 3-to-4-day-old were fasted for 12 h with access to water, transferred without anesthesia to the test arena (BioQuip Inc., model 1450B), and left to acclimate for 15 min before the trials. Groups of 15 to 25 flies (males and females, ratio about 1:1) were tested in each trial. Odor bait consisted of 400 mg of natural honey (handcrafted at Holambra-SP, Brazil) applied on a 25 mm diameter Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare), while the control bait contained the same weight of glycerol (Sigma-Aldrich). Two-choice assays were performed under controlled conditions (25 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, 12:12 L:D) during the morning (from 7 to 11 am), as favored by screwworm adults43. Testing cages were positioned below fluorescent lights and side-enfolded with white paper sheets to provide a homogeneous light distribution from above. Control trials ensured that flies did not prefer one side of the cage upon the other (Supplementary Fig. S10). Ablated “antennaless” flies (i.e., adults that had at least the 3rd antennae segment physically removed the day before trials) were also tested in order to ensure that choices were guided by olfaction. For the oviposition assays, groups of 10 to 20 fed and post-mated adult females of 6-to-9-day-old were tested in each trial. Odor bait contained 10 ml of 25% warmed waste larval rearing media47, while the same volume of warmed distilled water was used as control. Oviposition assays were performed in complete darkness, as it appears to increase oviposition attraction45 while also avoiding visual cues. Traps (Fig. 4B, see Supplementary Methods for craft details) were alternatively placed in opposite sides of cages, and their positions altered for every trial. Captures were scored after 4 h (foraging) or 90 min (oviposition). Attraction index was calculated as: AI = (nodor − ncontrol)/ntotal, where nodor is the number of flies captured in the odorant trap, ncontrol the number of flies captured in the control trap, and ntotal the total of flies tested. The AI ranges from − 1 (complete avoidance) to + 1 (complete attraction). Values of zero characterizes a neutral or non-detection of odors. Significant deviations of AI were tested with the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test with continuity correction using the wilcox.test function implemented in the R/stats package.

Data availability

The ChomOrco sequences were submitted to GenBank and can be retrieved under the accession numbers MT226797 and MT226799, for transcript and genomic sequences, respectively. The CmacOrco transcript can be retrieved under the GenBank accession number MT226798. A stable screwworm heterozygous population for ChomOrco (named Orco16Ko) is being maintained at the ARS laboratory at COPEG in Panama.

References

  1. Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M. S. Evolution of the Insects (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heath, A. C. G. Beneficial aspects of blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae). N. Z. Entomol. 7, 343–348 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amendt, J., Krettek, R. & Zehner, R. Forensic entomology. Naturwissenschaften 91, 51–65 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, M. & Wall, R. Myiasis of humans and domestic animals. Adv. Parasitol. 35, 257–334 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall, M. J., Wall, R. L. & Stevens, J. R. Traumatic myiasis: A neglected disease in a changing world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 61, 159–176 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Junqueira, A. C. M. et al. The microbiomes of blowflies and houseflies as bacterial transmission reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–15 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McDonagh, L. M. & Stevens, J. R. The molecular systematics of blowflies and screwworm flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) using 28S rRNA, COX1 and EF-1[alpha]: Insights into the evolution of dipteran parasitism. Parasitology 138, 1760–1777 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zumpt, F. Myiasis in man and animals in the Old World. A textbook for physicians, veterinarians and zoologists. Myiasis in Man and Animals in the Old World. A Textbook for Physicians, Veterinarians and Zoologists. (1965).

  9. Erzinclioglu, Y. Z. Origin of parasitism in blowflies. Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. (1989).

  10. Junqueira, A. C. M. et al. Large-scale mitogenomics enables insights into Schizophora (Diptera) radiation and population diversity. Sci. Rep. 6, 21762 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevens, J. R., Wallman, J. F., Otranto, D., Wall, R. & Pape, T. The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part II): biological and life-history studies. Trends Parasitol. 22, 181–188 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallman, J. F., Leys, R. & Hogendoorn, K. Molecular systematics of Australian carrion-breeding blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) based on mitochondrial DNA. Invertebr. Syst. 19, 1–15 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens, J. R. & Wallman, J. F. The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses. Trends Parasitol. 22, 129–136 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wall, R. L. & Shearer, D. Veterinary Ectoparasites: Biology, Pathology and Control (Wiley, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smadja, C. & Butlin, R. K. On the scent of speciation: the chemosensory system and its role in premating isolation. Heredity 102, 77–97 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bohbot, J. D. & Pitts, R. J. The narrowing olfactory landscape of insect odorant receptors. Front. Ecol. Evol. 3, 39 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yusseff-Vanegas, S. & Agnarsson, I. Molecular phylogeny of the forensically important genus Cochliomyia (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Zookeys 609, 107 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomberlin, J. K. et al. A review of bacterial interactions with blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of medical, veterinary, and forensic importance. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 110, 19–36 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, J. J. et al. Semiochemicals released from five bacteria identified from animal wounds infested by primary screwworms and their effects on fly behavioral activity. PLoS ONE 12, e0179090 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott, M. J., Concha, C., Welch, J. B., Phillips, P. L. & Skoda, S. R. Review of research advances in the screwworm eradication program over the past 25 years. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 164, 226–236 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Skoda, S. R., Phillips, P. L. & Welch, J. B. Screwworm (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the United States: Response to and Elimination of the 2016–2017 Outbreak in Florida. J. Med. Entomol. 55, 777–786 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Costa-Júnior, L. M. et al. A review on the occurrence of Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 28, 548–562 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paulo, D. F. et al. Specific gene disruption in the major livestock pests Cochliomyia hominivorax and Lucilia cuprina using CRISPR/Cas9. G3 9, 3045–3055 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Scott, M. J. et al. Genomic analyses of a livestock pest, the New World screwworm, find potential targets for genetic control programs. Commun. Biol. 3, 1–14 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Carey, A. F. & Carlson, J. R. Insect olfaction from model systems to disease control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12987–12995 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wicher, D. & Miazzi, F. Functional properties of insect olfactory receptors: Ionotropic receptors and odorant receptors. Cell Tissue Res. 383, 7–19 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Benton, R., Sachse, S., Michnick, S. W. & Vosshall, L. B. Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of Drosophila odorant receptors in vivo. PLoS Biol. 4, e20 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Silbering, A. F. et al. Complementary function and integrated wiring of the evolutionarily distinct Drosophila olfactory subsystems. J. Neurosci. 31, 13357–13375 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gomez-Diaz, C., Martin, F., Garcia-Fernandez, J. M. & Alcorta, E. The two main olfactory receptor families in Drosophila, ORs and IRs: A comparative approach. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 253 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Larsson, M. C. et al. Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 43, 703–714 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sato, K. et al. Insect olfactory receptors are heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels. Nature 452, 1002–1006 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. DeGennaro, M. et al. Orco mutant mosquitoes lose strong preference for humans and are not repelled by volatile DEET. Nature 498, 487–491 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koutroumpa, F. A. et al. Heritable genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 induces anosmia in a crop pest moth. Sci. Rep. 6, 29620 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yan, H. et al. An engineered orco mutation produces aberrant social behavior and defective neural development in ants. Cell 170, 736–747 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fandino, R. A. et al. Mutagenesis of odorant coreceptor Orco fully disrupts foraging but not oviposition behaviors in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15677–15685 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mansourian, S., Fandino, R. A. & Riabinina, O. Progress in the use of genetic methods to study insect behavior outside Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 36, 45–56 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karageorgi, M. et al. Evolution of multiple sensory systems drives novel egg-laying behavior in the fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. Curr. Biol. 27, 847–853 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakagawa, T., Pellegrino, M., Sato, K., Vosshall, L. B. & Touhara, K. Amino acid residues contributing to function of the heteromeric insect olfactory receptor complex. PLoS ONE 7, e32372–e32372 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Olafson, P. U. Molecular characterization and immunolocalization of the olfactory co-receptor Orco from two blood-feeding muscid flies, the stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans, L.) and the horn fly (Haematobia irritans irritans, L.). Insect Mol. Biol. 22, 131–142 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wicher, D. et al. Drosophila odorant receptors are both ligand-gated and cyclic-nucleotide-activated cation channels. Nature 452, 1007–1011 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernandes, F. D. F., Pimenta, P. F. P. & Linardi, P. M. Antennal sensilla of the new world screwworm fly, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J. Med. Entomol. 41, 545–551 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dehairs, J., Talebi, A., Cherifi, Y. & Swinnen, J. V. CRISP-ID: decoding CRISPR mediated indels by Sanger sequencing. Sci. Rep. 6, 28973 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Thomas, D. B. Behavioral aspects of screwworm ecology. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 66, 13–30 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peterson, R. D., Mackley, J. W. & Candido, A. O. Sugar feeding by adult screwworms (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and its effect on longevity and oocyte maturation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80, 130–135 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hammack, L. Oviposition by screwworm flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) on contact with host fluids. J. Econ. Entomol. 84, 185–190 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thomas, D. B. & Mangan, R. L. Oviposition and wound-visiting behavior of the screwworm fly, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82, 526–534 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chaudhury, M. F., Zhu, J. J., Sagel, A., Chen, H. & Skoda, S. R. Volatiles from waste larval rearing media attract gravid screwworm flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) to Oviposit. J. Med. Entomol. 51, 591–595 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jones, W. D., Nguyen, T.-A.T., Kloss, B., Lee, K. J. & Vosshall, L. B. Functional conservation of an insect odorant receptor gene across 250 million years of evolution. Curr. Biol. 15, R119–R121 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, X. et al. Molecular characterization and expression pattern of an odorant receptor from the myiasis-causing blowfly, Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Parasitol. Res. 110, 843–851 (2012).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Depetris-Chauvin, A., Galagovsky, D., Chevalier, C., Maniere, G. & Grosjean, Y. Olfactory detection of a bacterial short-chain fatty acid acts as an orexigenic signal in Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Sci. Rep. 7, 14230 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Leite, A. C. R. & Guevara, J. D. E. Scanning electron microscopy of the larval instars of Cochliomyia hominivorax. Med. Vet. Entomol. 7, 263–270 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Devaney, J. A., Eddy, G. W., Handke, B. D. & Lopez, E. Olfactory responses of the adult screw-worm after removal of the antennae, mouthparts, tarsi, and legs. J. Econ. Entomol. 63, 1816–1819 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hall, M. J. Trapping the flies that cause myiasis: Their responses to host-stimuli. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 89, 333–357 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ngern-klun, R., Sukontason, K., Methanitikorn, R., Vogtsberger, R. C. & Sukontason, K. L. Fine structure of Chrysomya nigripes (Diptera: Calliphoridae), a fly species of medical importance. Parasitol. Res. 100, 993–1002 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sollai, G. et al. Morpho-functional identification of abdominal olfactory receptors in the midge Culicoides imicola. J. Comp. Physiol. A 196, 817–824 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yadav, P. & Borges, R. M. The insect ovipositor as a volatile sensor within a closed microcosm. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 1554–1557 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hammack, L. & Holt, G. G. Responses of gravid screwworm flies, Cochliomyia hominivorax, to whole wounds, wound fluid, and a standard blood attractant in olfactometer tests. J. Chem. Ecol. 9, 913–922 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Li, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 in locusts: Successful establishment of an olfactory deficiency line by targeting the mutagenesis of an odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 79, 27–35 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Liu, Q. et al. Deletion of the Bombyx mori odorant receptor co-receptor (BmOrco) impairs olfactory sensitivity in silkworms. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 86, 58–67 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Carvalho, R. A., Azeredo-Espin, A. M. L. & Torres, T. T. Deep sequencing of New World screw-worm transcripts to discover genes involved in insecticide resistance. BMC Genom. 11, 695 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bendele, K. G., Guerrero, F. D., Cameron, C. & Perez de Leon, A. A. The testes transcriptome of the New World Screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax. Data Brief 9, 1141–1146 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Paulo, D. F., Azeredo-Espin, A. M. L., Canesin, L. E. C., Vicentini, R. & Junqueira, A. C. M. Identification and characterization of microRNAs in the screwworm flies Cochliomyia hominivorax and Cochliomyia macellaria (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Insect Mol. Biol. 26, 46–57 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Concha, C. et al. A transgenic male-only strain of the New World screwworm for an improved control program using the sterile insect technique. BMC Biol. 14, 72 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Li, F., Vensko, S. P., Belikoff, E. J. & Scott, M. J. Conservation and sex-specific splicing of the transformer gene in the calliphorids Cochliomyia hominivorax, Cochliomyia macellaria and Lucilia sericata. PLoS ONE 8, e56303 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hickner, P. V. et al. Physiological and molecular correlates of the screwworm fly attraction to wound and animal odors. Sci. Rep. 10, 20771 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lin, C.-C., Prokop-Prigge, K. A., Preti, G. & Potter, C. J. Food odors trigger Drosophila males to deposit a pheromone that guides aggregation and female oviposition decisions. Elife 4, e08688 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Venthur, H. & Zhou, J.-J. Odorant receptors and odorant-binding proteins as insect pest control targets: A comparative analysis. Front. Physiol. 9, 1163 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Scotto-Lavino, E., Du, G. & Frohman, M. A. 3’ end cDNA amplification using classic RACE. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2742–2745 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Scotto-Lavino, E., Du, G. & Frohman, M. A. 5’ end cDNA amplification using classic RACE. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2555–2562 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Slater, G. S. C. & Birney, E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinform. 6, 31 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Emonet, S. F. et al. Long PCR Product Sequencing (LoPPS): A shotgun-based approach to sequence long PCR products. Nat. Protoc. 2, 340–346 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Huang, X. & Madan, A. CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 9, 868–877 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Tsirigos, K. D., Peters, C., Shu, N., Käll, L. & Elofsson, A. The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W401-407 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Omasits, U., Ahrens, C. H., Müller, S. & Wollscheid, B. Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data. Bioinformatics 30, 884–886 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Cardoso, G. A., Matiolli, C. C., de Azeredo-Espin, A. M. L. & Torres, T. T. Selection and validation of reference genes for functional studies in the Calliphoridae family. J. Insect Sci. 14, 2 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Schmittgen, T. D. & Livak, K. J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1101–1108 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Concordet, J.-P. & Haeussler, M. CRISPOR: Intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res 46, W242–W245 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Bassett, A. & Liu, J.-L. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome engineering in Drosophila. Methods 69, 128–136 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Concha, C. et al. Efficient germ-line transformation of the economically important pest species Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 41, 70–75 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank: Rosangela Rodrigues, Thiago Mastrangelo, Marta Vargas, Yeiny Mudarra, Vanessa Dellis and Francisco Pinilla for their technical and administrative support. Thanks to Pamela Philips and John Welch for helpful discussions during the development of this study. We are indebted to the ARS staff working at the COPEG plant, especially Mario Vasquez, Joel Sanchez, and Gladys Quintero, for microinjection assistance and mutant lines maintenance. This study was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP: 2014/15042-3, and 2017/05432-7 given to D.F.P; 2015/02079-9 given to A.M.L.A.E), USDA-ARS (agreement no. 58-3094-7-015-FN, and ARS-COPEG agreement no. 58-6205-4-002-F). D.F.P was also supported by a STRI Short Term Fellowship (project award #4168). USDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.F.P., C.C. and A.C.M.J., conceptualized this study with insights from W.O.M., M.J.S. and A.M.L.A.-E. D.F.P., C.C., A.C.M.J., A.P.A., W.O.M. and M.J.S. conceived, designed, and/or performed the experiments, analyzed and/or interpreted the collected data. J.C. performed the antennae EM imaging with inputs from D.F.P. A.S.V. performed Orco immunostaining and imaging with inputs from D.F.P. S.R.S., A.A.P.-L., W.O.M., M.J.S., A.M.L.A.-E. provided the resources for this work. C.C. and A.M.L.A.-E. supervised and administered the study. D.F.P., C.C., A.C.M.J., A.A.P.-L., W.O.M., M.J.S. and A.M.L.A.-E. were engaged in the acquisition of the financial support for this study. D.F.P. wrote the manuscript with substantial insights from C.C., A.C.M.J., A.A.P.-L., M.J.S. and W.O.M. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Concha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Video 1.

Supplementary Information 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paulo, D.F., Junqueira, A.C.M., Arp, A.P. et al. Disruption of the odorant coreceptor Orco impairs foraging and host finding behaviors in the New World screwworm fly. Sci Rep 11, 11379 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90649-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90649-x

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing