## Introduction

As an important category of materials with increasing applications in various branches of science, porous materials have been applied for catalysis, energy storage, drug delivery, adsorption, and sample preparation1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Recently, adsorption has attracted much attention in separation and removal of water pollutants with high efficiency14,15,16,17,18,19,20. As a subgroup of porous materials for adsorption of pollutants, ordered mesoporous materials exhibited highly ordered structure, large pore volume, high surface area, and functionalizable surface21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. These characteristics make ordered mesoporous materials suitable for a broad range of applications, such as adsorption29,30,31. Various silica-based mesoporous materials such as SBA, MCM, KIT, and FDU families have been introduced during the last years. Among them, those with three-dimensional architecture (e.g. SBA-16, MCM-48, KIT-6, FDU-12) provided a suitable mass transfer for the diffusion of guest molecules32. In this regard, FDU-12 is a member of mesoporous silica materials with a highly ordered structure, high specific surface area, adjustable pore size, large pore diameter, and superior 3D channel33,34 which can be synthesized with different pore size distributions as reported in the literature35,36.

As an important application of mesoporous materials, their use in the nanocomposite industry as nanofiller has attracted a lot of attention owing to their unique properties. Nanocomposite materials provided a higher surface area to volume ratio in comparison to the neat polymer37. The use of mesoporous materials as filler in polymeric nanocomposites gathering the flexibility of organic polymers and the advantages of mesoporous materials such as high thermal and mechanical stability, and high surface area. Various organic polymers have been applied for the preparation of nanocomposites containing mesoporous materials. Among them, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and Nylon have been widely utilized due to their unique advantages. PMMA is a thermoplastic, transparent, and rigid polymer with good chemical resistance, good flexibility, low density, and low cost38. Nylon is a polar, electron-rich synthetic polyamide with a porous structure39 composed of microfibrils that are interconnected forming a three-dimensional network. Among commercial types of Nylon, Nylon 6 and Nylon 6,6 continue to be the most popular types.

The incorporation of nanofiller (e.g. silica-based mesoporous materials) into the organic polymer matrix can be attained by various methods such as melt blending, solution blending, in-situ polymerization, etc.40,41. Each of these methods has its advantages and disadvantages which were discussed in detail in the literature40,41. Briefly, in the melt blending technique, the polymer is melted and combined with the nanofiller to obtain polymer nanocomposite. In the case of solution blending, the nanofiller and organic polymer are dispersed in suitable solvents and then mixed by agitation (magnetic stirring, sonication, etc.) followed by evaporation of the solvent and composite film casting. In the in-situ polymerization technique, the nanofiller is dispersed into the monomer solution followed by polymerization of the mixture by the addition of a suitable catalyst (polymerization initiator).

To expand the applicability of mesoporous silica materials (e.g., FDU-12) and applying them as nanofiller in the polymer nanocomposites, their hydrophobicity and surface characteristics should be changed to enhance the compatibility of the nanofiller and polymer matrix. In this case, the incorporation of organic functional groups onto the ordered structure of the mesoporous silica materials seems to be a good choice. Surface functionalization of mesoporous silica materials with a suitable functional group could help linking up the filler with the polymer matrix through functional groups37,42,43,44,45,46. On the other hand, more effective dispersion and penetration occur. Due to the presence of a large number of hydroxyl groups on the surface of mesoporous silica materials, surface functionalization with a variety of organic moieties seems to be relatively easy47. In this case, there are few reports regarding the functionalization of mesoporous silica FDU-1248,49,50,51,52.

Among the diverse applications of polymer-based nanocomposites, their use in adsorption technique has received lots of attention. Due to their good performance, structural diversity, low toxicity, and low cost, polymer matrix nanocomposites are known as promising adsorbents for decontamination of polluted waters via adsorption technique37. In the present paper, two novel modified mesoporous silica FDU-12 materials were synthesized for incorporation into PMMA and Nylon 6,6 polymers through in-situ polymerization and solution blending techniques. Surface modification of the prepared mesoporous silica FDU-12 was performed using silane coupling agents of 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate and N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine. The prepared nanocomposites were applied as new adsorbents for Pb(II) uptake from aqueous solutions.

## Results and discussion

### Characterization

Various characterization techniques including SAXS, FT-IR, FE-SEM, TEM, N2 adsorption/desorption, and TGA were applied to examine the chemical structure and morphology of the prepared materials.

The SAXS pattern of the pristine mesoporous silica FDU-12 is shown in Fig. 1. As can be seen, the prepared sample exhibits some characteristic peaks especially at 2θ below 0.5. This pattern is similar to that of FDU-12 reported in the literature indicating the successful synthesis of ordered FDU-12 mesoporous silica36,47,48,53,54.

Figure 2 shows the FT-IR spectra of pristine FDU-12, FDU-12-methacrylate, FDU-12-triamine, FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA, and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6. In the pristine FDU-12 spectrum (Fig. 2a), the bands at 463, 810, and 1078 cm−1 are attributed to the Si–O–Si vibrations which are in agreement with previous reports33,34,55. The broadband around 3435 cm−1 corresponds to O–H stretching of the surface silanol groups and physically adsorbed water molecules. Also, the band located at 1633 cm−1 is attributed to the bending mode of O–H. In the case of FDU-12-methacrylate and FDU-12-triamine (Fig. 2b,c), in addition to the bands observed for pristine FDU-12, new bands (related to the silane coupling agent) appeared. The bands located at 2957 and 2849 cm−1 correspond to the C–H stretching vibrations and the peak at 1471 cm−1 is corresponds to the bending vibration of the C–H of the organic part of the silane coupling agent. For FDU-12-methacrylate, the band at 1733 cm−1 is characteristic of the C=O bond. In the case of FDU-12-triamine, the broadband at 3200–3600 cm−1 revealed the presence of –NH2 and –OH groups on the surface of the material. The FTIR spectra of FDU-12-methacrylate and FDU-12-triamine indicated successful surface modification of the pristine FDU-12 with the applied silane coupling agents. The FT-IR spectrum of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA material (Fig. 2d) shows C–H asymmetric stretching bands located at 2998 and 2952 cm−1 for CH3 and CH2 groups, respectively. A peak that appeared at 2849 cm−1 is related to the C–H symmetric stretching in the CH3 group. The characteristic band at 1731 cm−1 corresponds to the C=O bond. Other characteristic bands related to PMMA also appear in the spectrum of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA correspond to different modes of CH2 and CH3 vibrational modes38,56. In the case of FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 (Fig. 2e), the characteristic peaks at 3290, 2849 & 2921 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibration of the N–H bond and C-H stretching vibrations of the NY6,6. The peaks centered at 1627 and 1530 cm−1 are assigned to the stretching vibration of carbonyl groups and N–H bending vibration. Other characteristic bands related to NY6,6 also appeared in the spectrum of FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 as reported in the literature57,58.

To study the morphological characteristics of the prepared materials, FE-SEM, and TEM techniques were applied. The FE-SEM images of the pristine FDU-12, FDU-12-methacrylate, FDU-12-triamine, FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA, and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 are shown in Fig. 3a–e. As can be seen, Fig. 3a shows the porous structure of pristine FDU-12. After surface modification with silane coupling agents of 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (Fig. 3b) and N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine (Fig. 3c), a slight change in the surface morphology has occurred and the surface of FDU-12 turned smoother. This is due to the silane coupling agents grafting on the surface of FDU-12. In the case of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA (Fig. 3d), a monolithic and relatively smooth surface morphology was observed while the FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 (Fig. 3e) showed more porous structure which is a characteristic of Ny6,6 morphology. The TEM image of the synthesized pristine FDU-12 is also shown in Fig. 3f. The TEM image clearly demonstrated the well-ordered mesopore structure with large cage units of FDU-12 as reported in the literature53,54,59.

The N2 adsorption/desorption measurements of the pristine FDU-12, FDU-12-methacrylate, and FDU-12-triamine are shown in Fig. 4. The three samples showed type IV isotherms with H2-type hysteresis loops according to the IUPAC classification. The BET surface areas of the samples were obtained 376, 29, and 115 m2 g-1 for FDU-12, FDU-12-methacrylate, and FDU-12-triamine, respectively. The decrease in the BET surface area may be due to surface modification with silane coupling agents which is in agreement with the results obtained by FE-SEM analysis. The mean pore diameters according to the BJH model are also shown in Fig. 4. Mean pore diameters of 9.2, 1.2, and 6.9 nm were calculated for pristine FDU-12, FDU-12-methacrylate, and FDU-12-triamine, respectively. As data showed, after surface modification, the textural parameters of the pristine FDU-12 have reduced as it was anticipatable. We applied a post-modification strategy for the surface modification of FDU-12. This strategy suffers from the pore-blocking problem which means the pores of the porous material are blocked by silane coupling agents which results in a decrease in the accessible surface area. We propose that pore-blocking happens more intensely in the case of 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate rather than N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine due to more reactivity of methacrylate-based coupling agent. As a result, FDU-12- methacrylate shows a lower surface area than FDU-12- triamine.

To study the thermal stability of the prepared materials, thermogravimetric analysis was performed for pristine FDU-12 and FDU-12-triamine. The results are illustrated in Fig. 5. A weight loss of 18% was observed for the pristine FDU-12 sample. In the case of FDU-12-triamine, a continuous weight loss was observed. A relatively large loss (42%) was observed for FDU-12-triamine. The difference between the final weight loss of the two samples was related to modifier loaded on the surface of pristine FDU-12.

#### The effect of pH

The effect of pH on the adsorption of Pb(II) onto the prepared FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 adsorbents was studied in the range of 2.0–10.0. In this step, 12 mL of an aqueous standard solution of Pb(II) (50 mg L-1) with 5.0 mg of each adsorbent was considered. All the adsorption experiments were performed at 298 K for 12 h (180 rpm). As can be seen in Fig. 6a, for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA, the removal efficiency was enhanced with increasing solution pH up to 8.0 and then a slight decrease in the removal efficiency was observed for greater pHs. A similar trend was observed for FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 with maximum removal efficiency at pH 9.0. In acidic mediums, the competition between H+ and Pb(II) ions in binding to the active sites of the adsorbent caused a decrease in removal efficiency. Accordingly, pH 8.0 and pH 9.0 were selected for further experiments using FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6, respectively.

#### The effect of the adsorbent amount

The effect of adsorbent amount on the adsorption of Pb(II) was investigated by studying various adsorbent amount in the range of 2.0–20.0 mg. In these experiments, 12 mL of standard solution of Pb(II) with the concentration of 50 mg L-1 (pH = 8.0 for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and pH = 9.0 for FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6) were used. The adsorption experiments were performed at 298 K for 12 h (180 rpm). As data in Fig. 6b shows, the removal efficiency was increased with enhancing adsorbent amount from 2.0 to 5.0 mg for both FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6. In the case of both adsorbents, no important increase in the removal efficiency was observed for higher adsorbent amounts. Based on the results obtained from the experiments, an amount of 5.0 mg of each of the adsorbents was selected for further experiments.

#### The effect of contact time

To study the effect of contact time on adsorption efficiency, various contact times between 20 and 600 min were tested. In this step, 12 mL of a standard solution of Pb(II) at the concentration level of 50 mg L-1 (pH = 8.0 for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and pH = 9.0 for FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6) and 5.0 mg of each sorbent was used. Adsorptions were performed at 298 K and 180 rpm. As can be seen in Fig. 6c, the removal efficiencies using both FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 were sharply increased with increasing contact time from 20 to 100 min. A slight enhancement in the removal efficiencies was also observed from 100 to 140 min. Longer contact times did not affect the removal efficiency in the case of both adsorbents. This relatively fast adsorption was mainly due to the high accessible sites on the surface of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 adsorbents. In conclusion, the contact time was set to 140 min for further experiments to ensure that equilibrium is reached.

Four kinetic models including pseudo-first-order (PFO), pseudo-second-order (PSO), Elovich, and intraparticle diffusion (IPD) were used to conduct kinetic studies. The equation of the applied kinetic models are as follows:

$$\mathit{log}\left({q}_{e}-{q}_{t}\right)=\mathit{log}{q}_{e}-\frac{{k}_{1}}{2.303}t$$
(1)
$$\frac{t}{{q}_{t}}=\frac{1}{{k}_{2}\times {q}_{e}^{2}}+\frac{1}{{q}_{e}}t$$
(2)
$${q}_{t}=\frac{\mathit{ln} \left(\alpha \beta \right)}{\beta }+\frac{\mathit{ln}t}{\beta }$$
(3)
$${q}_{t}={k}_{dif}({t)}^{0.5}+C$$
(4)

Also, qe, qt, k1, k2, α & β, and kdif are the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (mg g-1), the adsorption capacity at time t (mg g-1), PFO rate constant (min-1), PSO rate constant (g mg-1 min-1), Elovich constants (mg g-1 min-1 & g mg-1), IPD rate constant (mg g-1 min-0.5), and a constant (mg g-1), respectively. The results of the fitting are illustrated in Fig. 7 and Table 1. The data showed the PSO kinetic model provided the best fit in the case of both adsorbents. The R2 values obtained by PSO kinetic model were obtained 0.9952 and 0.9955 for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6, respectively. Accordingly, the chemical adsorption process can be described with the PSO model. On the other hand, the presence of a large number of hydroxyl, amine, and carbonyl groups on the surface of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 might be involved in the process.

#### The effect of Pb(II) initial concentration and adsorption isotherm

The effect of the initial concentration of Pb(II) on the adsorption process was studied in the range of 1.0 to 70.0 mg L-1 using FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 as adsorbents (Fig. 8a). In these experiments, 12 mL of the standard solution of Pb(II) (pH  8.0 for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and pH  9.0 for FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6) with 5.0 mg of each adsorbent were used and the experiments were conducted at 298 K and 180 rpm. The contact time was set to 140 min for both adsorbents. To study the adsorption isotherm, two isotherm models including Langmuir and Freundlich were applied. The linear form of the used isotherm models is expressed as follows:

$$\frac{{C}_{e}}{{q}_{e}}=\frac{1}{{q}_{max}\times {k}_{L}}+\frac{{C}_{e}}{{q}_{max}}$$
(5)
$$\mathit{log}{q}_{e}=\frac{1}{n}\mathit{log}{C}_{e}+\mathit{log}{k}_{F}$$
(6)

In the equations, Ce is the concentration of Pb(II) at equilibrium (mg L-1), qe is the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (mg g-1), qmax is the maximum adsorption capacity of adsorbent (mg g-1), kL is the Langmuir constant (L mg-1), and n and kF ((mg g-1) (L mg-1)1/n) are the Freundlich isotherm constants. The adsorption isotherms and calculated parameters are shown in Fig. 8b–d and Table 2, respectively. As data in Table 2 show, the Langmuir model exhibited the best fit to the experimental data considering the R2 value (0.9926 and 0.9955 for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6, respectively). The maximum adsorption capacities of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 obtained by the Langmuir model were found to be 105.3 and 109.9 mg g−1, respectively. In the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model, it is assumed that the energy of adsorption is constant and there is a fixed number of identical adsorption sites on the adsorbent surface. In the next step, the RL value was also calculated to predict adsorption performance. It can be defined as follows:

$${R}_{L}=\frac{1}{{1+(C}_{e}{k}_{L})}$$
(7)

The calculated RL values are shown in Fig. 8d. In the case of both adsorbents, the RL values were obtained between 0 and 1 which represents favorable adsorption of Pb(II) onto the FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6.

Table 3 shows data from the previous studies for the removal of Pb(II). The FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 adsorbents exhibited promising Pb(II) adsorption capacity when compared to other adsorbents.

To study the recyclability and reusability of the prepared adsorbents, at first, 12 mL of the standard solution of Pb(II) (50 mg L-1, pH = 8.0 for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and pH = 9.0 for FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6) with 5.0 mg of each adsorbent were used and the experiments were conducted at 298 K and 180 rpm. The contact time was set to 140 min for both adsorbents. After equilibrium, the adsorbents were isolated from the solution by centrifugation. Desorption was performed using 100 mL of 0.1 mol L-1 of HCl solution for 120 min. Then, the adsorbents were rinsed several times with pure water, dried, and used for further experiments. In the case of both adsorbents, the adsorption capacity remained approximately constant for the three cycles and then decreased 25–30% after the fourth cycle. This decrease was probably attributed to the weight loss of adsorbent in the consecutive adsorption/desorption cycles.

##### Selectivity tests

5.0 mg adsorbent (FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA or FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6) was added to an aqueous solution (12 mL) containing 50 mg L–1 of Pb(II), Zn(II), Ni(II), Mn(II), Cu(II), and Cr(III) diluted from the commercial stock solution and further analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The mixture was then shaken at 180 rpm and 298 K for 140 min. The adsorbent was separated from the mixture and the remain concentration of above-mentioned heavy metals in the solution was analyzed by ICP-OES. As shown in Fig. 9, both adsorbents exhibited acceptable selectivity to adsorb Pb(II) in the presence of all other competitive ions. These results demonstrate that these adsorbents can be beneficial for practical adsorption application, i.e., the adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous media in the presence of other coexisting meal ions.

## Conclusions

To expand the applicability of mesoporous silica materials and applying them as nanofiller in the polymer matrix nanocomposites, in this study, at first, a three-dimensional large mesoporous silica (FDU-12) was synthesized and then modified with 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate and N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine. This step was performed to enhance the compatibility of the nanofiller and polymer matrix by changing the hydrophobicity and surface characteristics of the prepared mesoporous silica. After surface modification of the mesoporous silica material, they were used as nanofiller for the preparation of PMMA- and NY6,6-based nanocomposites. The newly nanocomposites were prepared through two synthesis procedures. The FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA was fabricated using the in-situ polymerization technique while the FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 was prepared via a simple and fast solution blending technique. Due to the abundant active sites on the surface of the adsorbents, relatively high surface area, and various types of interactions, the prepared adsorbents showed good performance toward Pb(II) uptake from aqueous media. The studies on the affecting parameters on the adsorption process revealed that the best performance was obtained at a sample solution pH of 8.0 and 9.0 (for FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6, respectively), adsorbent amount of 5.0 mg, and contact time of 140 min for both nanocomposites. Among the applied kinetic models, the PSO model showed the best fit for the two adsorbents. The isotherm studies were also showed the Langmuir model provided the best matches considering the R2 value. Based on the Langmuir model, the FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA and FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 adsorbents provided maximum adsorption capacities of 105.3 and 109.9 mg g-1, respectively. The prepared nanocomposites showed good performance and can be considered for Pb(II) removal from aqueous solutions.

## Experimental

### Materials and reagents

Absolute ethanol, toluene, ortho-phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, formic acid, acetic acid, boric acid, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), sodium hydroxide, lead(II) nitrate, potassium chloride, and benzoyl peroxide were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Pluronic F-127 (Mw ~ 12,600 Da), 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB), N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine, methyl methacrylate, and Nylon 6,6 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate was obtained from TCI (Europe). Pure water was prepared via a laboratory-scale water purification system. A stock solution of Pb(II) at the concentration level of 1000 mg L−1 was prepared in pure water. The working standard solutions were daily prepared from the stock solution. The Brighton-Robinson buffer system (universal buffer) was used for the preparation of aqueous solutions with different pHs.

### Apparatus and instruments

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) profiles of the prepared materials were recorded on an S3-MICROpix Hecus X-Ray system (Austria) at 50 kV and 1 mA. A Thermo Nicolet Avatar 330 FTIR spectrometer (USA) was applied for the FTIR analysis of the materials. The spectra were recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm-1. The resolution was set to 4 cm-1. Porosimetry results were obtained by the nitrogen adsorption/desorption technique at 77 K on a Belsorp-mini II (BEL Japan Inc., Japan) instrument. The adsorption isotherms were measured at 77 K (liquid nitrogen). The FE-SEM and TEM images of the samples were obtained by MIRA3 TESCAN-XMU (Czech Republic) and Philips CM 120 (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) microscopes. 2-propanol was used for sample dispersion before the analysis. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on a Mettler TGA instrument from 25 to 800 °C. Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy was performed on a 240FS AA instrument (Agilent, USA). Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy was carried out on an Optima 7300 DV inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) instrument (PerkinElmer, USA). A MISONIX XL-2000 ultrasonic liquid processor (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA) at a power of 100 W was used to carry out the reactions where needed.

### Synthesis of mesoporous silica FDU-12

At first, pristine mesoporous silica FDU-12 was synthesized according to the method reported in the literature34,55 with some modifications. Typically, 3.0 g of Pluronic F-127 was dissolved in 120 mL of HCL (2.0 mol L-1). After 20 min, 7.5 g of KCl and 3.0 g of TMB were individually added to the solution and the mixture was stirred at 288 K for 2 h. Then, 12.5 g of TEOS was added to the mixture and the solution was heated at 383 K in an autoclave for 72 h. The obtained solid product was then gathered and washed with pure water and ethanol before oven drying at 343 K for 24 h. Afterward, the material was calcined at 823 K for 5 h.

### Surface modification of FDU-12

To surface modification of the prepared FDU-12, two silane coupling agents of 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate and N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine were applied utilizing post-synthesis modification according to the method described by Soltani and co-workers27,37,46 with a little modification. The synthesized FDU-12 (0.5 g) and silane coupling agent (0.5 mL) were added to 40 mL of dried toluene and the mixture was refluxed at 383 K for 24 h. The obtained product was then isolated with the help of a Büchner funnel, washed with toluene and ethanol, and oven-dried under at 343 K for 24 h. The samples modified with 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate and N1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine were denoted as FDU-12-methacrylate and FDU-12-triamine, respectively.

### Preparation of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA nanocomposite through in-situ polymerization approach

For fabrication of FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA nanocomposite via in-situ polymerization approach, 0.15 g of FDU-12-methacrylate was added to 50 mL of dry toluene and the mixture was sonicated for 10 min. Then, 4.85 mL methyl methacrylate monomer was added to the mixture with mechanical stirring to obtain a stable suspension and sonicated for 15 min. Afterward, 1.0 wt% of benzoyl peroxide initiator was added to the mixture and it was refluxed under isothermal conditions for 24 h. After in-situ polymerization, the mixture was sonicated for 15 min and poured into a clean glass Petri dish, and dried at room temperature for 5 h. The FDU-12-methacrylate/PMMA nanocomposite was then obtained in this step.

### Preparation of FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 nanocomposite

FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 nanocomposite was fabricated through the solution blending protocol. An amount of 4.85 g of NY6,6 was added to 40 mL of formic acid and the mixture was refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere for 6 h to obtain a clear solution. Then 3 wt% of FDU-12-triamine was added to 10 mL of formic acid and the mixture was sonicated for 15 min. Then, the FDU-12-triamine mixture was added dropwise to the polymer solution and the mixture was refluxed for 12 h. Afterward, the mixture was sonicated for 1 h and the resultant was cast onto a clean glass Petri dish and dried at room temperature. The FDU-12-triamine/NY6,6 nanocomposite then resulted in this step.

The adsorption experiments were performed to study the behavior of the prepared materials for the removal of Pb(II). Batch experiments were carried out using 12 mL of an aqueous standard solution of Pb(II) and various adsorbent dosages in 15 mL polyethylene containers. The procedure was performed at 180 rpm and 298 K for a specific period. Then, the adsorbent was separated from the mixture and the remain concentration of Pb(II) in the solution was determined using flame atomic absorption spectroscopy or inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy. To calculate removal efficiency (RE) and adsorption capacity (qe), the following equations (Eq. 8 and 9) were used:

$$RE \left(\%\right)=\frac{{C}_{i}-{C}_{e}}{{C}_{i}}\times 100$$
(8)
$${q}_{e}=\left(\frac{{C}_{i}-{C}_{e}}{W}\right)\times V$$
(9)

where Ci, Ce, V, and W are the initial concentrations of Pb(II) in the solution (mg L−1), the equilibrium concentrations of Pb(II) in the solution (mg L-1), the solution volume (mL), and the adsorbent amount (mg), respectively.