Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Effects of cadmium stress on growth and physiological characteristics of sassafras seedlings

Abstract

The effects of cadmium stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Sassafras tzumu Hemsl. were studied in pot experiments. Five Cd levels were tested [CT(Control Treatment) : 0 mg/kg, Cd5: 5 mg/kg, Cd20: 20 mg/kg, Cd50: 50 mg/kg, and Cd100: 100 mg/kg]. The growth and physiological characteristics of the sassafras seedlings in each level were measured. The results showed that soil Cd had negative influences on sassafras growth and reduced the net growth of plant height and the biomass of leaf, branch and root. Significant reductions were recorded in root biomass by 18.18%(Cd5), 27.35%(Cd20), 27.57%(Cd50) and 28.95%(Cd100). The contents of hydrogen peroxide decreased first then increased while malondialdehyde showed the opposite trend with increasing cadmium concentration. Decreases were found in hydrogen peroxide contents by 10.96%(Cd5), 11.82%(Cd20) and 7.02%(Cd50); increases were found in malondialdehyde contents by 15.47%(Cd5), 16.07%(Cd20) and 7.85%(Cd50), indicating that cadmium stress had a certain effect on the peroxidation of the inner cell membranes in the seedlings that resulted in damage to the cell membrane structure. Superoxide dismutase activity decreased among treatments by 17.05%(Cd5), 10,68%(Cd20), 20.85%(Cd50) and 8.91%(Cd100), while peroxidase activity increased steadily with increasing cadmium concentration; these results suggest that peroxidase is likely the main protective enzyme involved in the reactive oxygen removal system in sassafras seedlings. Upward trends were observed in proline content by 90.76%(Cd5), 74.36%(Cd20), 99.73%(Cd50) and 126.01%(Cd100). The increase in proline content with increasing cadmium concentration indicated that cadmium stress induced proline synthesis to resist osmotic stress in the seedlings. Compared to that in CT, the soluble sugar content declined under the different treatments by 32.84%(Cd5), 5.85%(Cd20), 25.55%(Cd50) and 38.69%(Cd100). Increases were observed in the soluble protein content by 2.34%(Cd5), 21.36%(Cd20), 53.15%(Cd50) and 24.22%(Cd100). At different levels of cadmium stress, the chlorophyll content in the seedlings first increased and then decreased, and it was higher in the Cd5 and Cd20 treatments than that in the CT treatment. These results reflected that cadmium had photosynthesis-promoting effects at low concentrations and photosynthesis-suppressing effects at high concentrations. The photosynthetic gas exchange parameters and photosynthetic light-response parameters showed downward trends with increasing cadmium concentration compared with those in CT; these results reflected the negative effects of cadmium stress on photosynthesis in sassafras seedlings.

Introduction

In recent years, environmental pollution and ecological damage have become increasingly serious due to the rapid development of industrialization. Among these issues, soil heavy metal pollution has become one of the most prominent environmental problems in the world. Cadmium (Cd) is a toxic, silver-white metal element. Because of its water solubility, fluidity, and toxicity, Cd can be easily absorbed by plant roots, and it can alter plant structural and functional properties, inhibit seed germination and root elongation1. Cd directly or indirectly inhibits physiological processes such as respiration, photosynthesis, water movement and gas exchange, leading to impairment in plant metabolism2. Additionally, Cd can affect the metabolism, chlorophyll synthesis3 of pants, and disturbs antioxidant defense system by increasing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS)4.

The absorption and accumulation of Cd can affect the normal growth of plants. Cd stress leads to a decline in biomass and photosynthetic rate of plants, also causes oxidative damage and imbalance of nutrient uptake5,6. Apart from inhibiting the formation of photosynthetic pigments, reducing the efficiency of photosynthesis, Cd stress can also increase the accumulation of active oxygen and enhance peroxidation7,8. Plants can reduce the stress caused by heavy metals through the generation and synthesis of various enzymatic antioxidants, non-enzymatic antioxidants, osmolytes and chelating agents9. Because that Cd can accumulate in plants and enter human body through the food chain, causing chronic poisoning and endangering human health10, it is of great importance to find an effective method to remediate Cd-contaminated soils.

Woody plants have proved an effective means for removing or stabilizing toxic metals from contaminated soils, with their high accumulation of heavy metals, perennial trait, high biomass production, and fast growth6,11,12,13. Sassafras tzumu Hemsl. belongs to the genus Sassafras and the family Lauraceae. It is often used for shipbuilding and making high-quality furniture. Sassafras trees are beautiful and have red leaves in autumn, which makes them excellent ornamental trees for gardens14,15. Sassafras has good prospects in terms of timber production and garden use. Therefore, most studies on sassafras in China have focused on genetic breeding and reproduction technology, cultivation and afforestation technology, disease and pest control, etc.16,17,18. However, few studies have been performed on the physiological conditions of sassafras under heavy metal stress. In view of this, this study aimed to investigate the effects of Cd stress on the growth, photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of sassafras and to analyze the physiological response of sassafras to Cd stress in order to provide a theoretical basis for further research on the resistance of sassafras to Cd stress.

Materials and methods

Experimental design

The plants used in this experiment were 1-year sassafras seedlings, which are common native tree species in Sichuan. The seedlings were obtained from the same source and were pests and diseases free, which were collected in accordance with relevant national and international guidelines and legislations. The tested soil was a yellow soil taken from a forest farm in Ya’an city, Sichuan Province. The pH of the test soil was 5.75, and the total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents were 9.10 g/kg, 0.64 g/kg, and 12.59 g/kg, respectively.

The experiment was conducted at the teaching and research station of Sichuan Agricultural University. Its geographical coordinates are east longitude 103°51′29″ and north latitude 30°42′18″. Approximately 12 kg of mixed soil was weighed and placed into each pot. The content of Cd2+ (mg/kg) in the soil of each pot was calculated according to the dry weight of the soil, and Cd2+ was added to the pots in the form of a CdCl2 aqueous solution. A single-factor test design was used to establish 5 cadmium treatment levels: CT (0 mg/kg), Cd5 (5 mg/kg), Cd20 (20 mg/kg), Cd50 (50 mg/kg), and Cd100 (100 mg/kg). Five replicates were established for each treatment group, and all treated plants were placed in a greenhouse.

The experiment began in early May 2019. CdCl2 was applied 5 times, with an interval of 15 d; the same amount of pure water was added to CT. At the time of application, the prepared CdCl2 solution was poured evenly onto the soil surface in the basin. Any CdCl2 solution that exuded from the pot was collected at the bottom of the basin with a tray pad and poured back into the soil. The CdCl2 applications ended in mid-July 2019. After 30 d of plant growth, the plant photosynthetic and physiological characteristics were measured. The plants were harvested at the end of December 2019, and the plant roots, branches and leaves were harvested separately.

Determination of the plant growth index

The height and ground diameter of each plant were measured before and after the experiment, and the subtraction method was used to calculate the results. The height of the seedlings was measured with a ruler (precision: 0.1 cm). An electronic Vernier caliper (precision: 0.1 mm) was used to measure the ground diameter from two perpendicular directions at the root neck, and the average value was calculated. The plant samples were washed with deionized water, and then the plant organs, i.e., roots, branches and leaves, were harvested separately. In the lab, the plant organs were put in an oven at 105 °C for 30 min, after which they were dried at 70 °C to constant weight and weighed. The biomass of each dried organ was then calculated.

Determination of the physiological characteristics

In the 5 replicates of each treatment, five mature fresh functional leaves were randomly selected from the middle to upper part of the tree canopy and placed separately into an ice box for the measurement of each index.

The content of free proline (Pro) was extracted with sulfonyl salicylic acid and determined with acidic ninhydrin colorimetry19. The content of soluble protein (SP) was determined by the Coomassie brilliant blue method20. The malondialdehyde (MDA) and soluble sugar contents (SS) were determined by the thiobarbituric acid heating colorimetric method20,21.

The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), Peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) were determined by the spectrophotometer. 0.2 g of the fresh leaves were weighed and placed in a grinding bowl, 2 ml phosphate buffer solution was added and placed in an ice bath for rapid grinding, then centrifuge at 10,000 r/min at 4 °C for 15 min, the supernatant was collected as the test sample. According to the method of Donahue et al.22, the OD value at the wavelength of 560 nm causes 50% inhibition of the reduction rate of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) to measure the SOD activity. POD activity was measured by the Guaiacol oxidation method23, and the increase in absorbance at a wavelength of 470 nm was determined. CAT activity was quantified as the decrease in the absorbance at a wavelength of 240 nm caused by the consumption of the substrate H2O224. The H2O2 content was determined with a method based on H2O2 and titanium ions forming a colored [TiO(H2O2)]2+ coordination compound (the specific absorption peak is 410 nm). All enzyme activities were determined with kits produced by Nanjing Jiancheng Biological Research Company.

Determination of the chlorophyll content

Two to three mature functional leaves of the plants in each treatment were randomly selected for the determination of chlorophyll content. During the determination, after removing the veins of the leaf, cut the remaining parts into pieces, and store the samples in refrigerator for preservation. An amount of 0.1 g leaves was accurately weighed and placed into a 10 mL centrifuge tube. An amount of 9 ml chlorophyll extraction solution (80% acetone and anhydrous ethanol 1:1 mix) was added, and the mixture was placed in the dark and left for more than 24 h until the leaves were completely white26. Spectral measurements were performed at wavelengths of 663 nm and 646 nm.

Determination of the photosynthetic parameters

The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), and intracellular CO2 concentration (Ci) were determined with an LI-6800 portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor Inc, USA). Three plants were selected from each treatment, three leaves were selected from each plant, and ten data points were recorded for each leaf.

Determination of the photosynthetic light-response curve

The LI-6800 portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor Inc, USA) was used to measure the photosynthetic light-response curves of the leaves selected for the previous determination. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) gradient values were 1800, 1600, 1000, 800, 600, 400, 200, 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0 μmol/m2/s, the CO2 concentration was set to 400 ppm, and the room temperature was set to 30 °C. Each leaf was photoinduced for 20 min before the determination, and in this test, the photoinduction strength was 800 μmol/m2/s.

The photosynthetic light-response curves of sassafras leaves treated with different concentrations of cadmium were fitted by using Ye’s27 modified linear hyperbolic model. The fitting equation of the modified linear hyperbolic model is as follows:

$$ Pn = \alpha \frac{1 - \beta I}{{1 - \gamma I}}I - Rd $$

When Pn = 0, the light compensation point (LCP) can be obtained:

$$ LCP = \frac{{\alpha - Rd\gamma - \sqrt {\left( {\alpha - Rd} \right)^{2} - 4\alpha \beta Rd} }}{2\alpha \beta } $$

With dPn/dI = 0, the light saturation point (LSP) can be obtained:

$$ LSP = \frac{{\sqrt {\left( {\beta + \gamma } \right)/\beta } - 1}}{\gamma } $$

When I = Is, Pnmax can be obtained:

$$ Pn\max = \alpha \frac{1 - \beta Is}{{1 + \gamma Is}}Is - Rd $$

where Pn is the net photosynthetic rate; Pnmax is the maximum net photosynthetic rate at light saturation; α is the initial quantum efficiency; I is the photosynthetically active radiation; Rd is the dark respiration rate; β is the light suppression coefficient, which is the correction coefficient; and γ is the light saturation coefficient, which is the ratio of the initial slope of the light-response curve of the plant leaves to the maximum net photosynthetic rate.

Statistical analysis

All data were collected in Excel 2016 and statistically analyzed with SPSS 24.0. The significance of the differences among means was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were performed mostly with Duncan’s test to compare the mean values between treatments (p < 0.05). The figures were drawn in Origin 8.5.

Results

The effects of Cd stress on plant growth

The net growth in plant height decreased with increasing Cd concentration, but there were no significant differences among treatments (P < 0.05). The net growth in ground diameter showed an increasing trend, but there were no significant differences among treatments (P < 0.05). Significant reductions were recorded in root biomass by 18.18%, 27.35%, 27.57% and 28.96%, respectively among treatments compared to CT. The biomass of leaves and branches decreased with the aggravation of cadmium stress, and there were significant differences between treatments and CT for branches (except in Cd5); however, no significant differences were found for leaf biomass (P < 0.05). Declines were found in total biomass by 11.01%, 18.92%, 21.14% and 27.72%, respectively in sassafras under different Cd treatments. (Table 1).

Table 1 The growth characteristics of sassafras seedlings under different levels of cadmium treatment.

The effect of Cd stress on physiological characteristics

The contents of H2O2 and MDA in sassafras leaves under Cd stress

The H2O2 content decreased first by 10.96%, 11.82% and 7.02% respectively in Cd 5, Cd 20 and Cd50, and then increased by 2.36% in Cd100, but there were no significant differences among treatments. The MDA content showed the opposite trend to the H2O2 content as the cadmium concentration increased; increases were found in Cd 5, Cd 20 and Cd50 by 15.47%, 16.07% and 7.85%, respectively, and declined by 15.24% in Cd100; however, there were still no significant differences among treatments. (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Changes in the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents of sassafras leaves under different levels of cadmium treatment. Different lowercase letters over the columns indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05), no lowercase letters indicate there’s no significant differences between treatments, the same below.

Response of antioxidant enzyme activity to Cd stress

SOD activity fluctuated with the increasing cadmium concentration, while the CT treatment showed the highest SOD activity, decreases were found by 17.05%, 10.68%, 20.85% and 8.91%, respectively among treatments. CAT activity showed a fluctuation trend, there were increases found in Cd5, Cd20 and Cd 100 by 47.19%, 32.45% and 9.06%, and decreased by 58.77% in Cd50. POD activity showed a slowly increasing trend, and the highest activity was observed in the Cd100 treatment. The increases of POD activity were recorded in sassafras by 5.41%, 3.66%, 2.81% and 8.83%, respectively in Cd5, Cd20, Cd50 and Cd100. (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) activities in sassafras leaves under different levels of cadmium treatment.

Changes in the contents of osmotic regulation substances in response to Cd stress

Upward trends were observed in Pro content by 90.76%, 74.36%, 99.73% and 126.01%, respectively among treatments; the Cd100 treatment had the maximum Pro content, but there were no significant differences among treatments. The content of SS was the highest in the CT treatment, while the SS content in the other treatments decreased compared to CT. Decreases were found in SS content by 32.84%, 5.85%, 25.55% and 38.69%, respectively. The SP content first increased and then decreased with increasing cadmium concentration and reached a maximum in the Cd50 treatment. Compared to CT, there were increases recorded in SP content by 2.34%, 21.36%, 53.13% and 24.22%, respectively; however, the differences between treatments were not significant. (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure3

Changes in proline (Pro), soluble sugar (SS) and soluble protein contents (SP) in sassafras leaves under different levels of cadmium treatment.

The effects of Cd stress on photosynthetic characteristics

Chlorophyll content in sassafras leaves under cadmium stress

With the increase in the cadmium concentration, the chlorophyll a and b contents and the total chlorophyll content in sassafras leaves first increased and then decreased, reaching a maximum in Cd20. There were no significant differences in the chlorophyll a content or the total chlorophyll content under the Cd5, Cd20 and Cd50 treatments, while the Cd100 treatment was significantly different from CT (P < 0.05). The chlorophyll b content showed a similar change trend as the chlorophyll a content, but a significant difference between the chlorophyll a and b contents appeared in Cd50 (P < 0.05). (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure4

Chlorophyll content of sassafras leaves under different concentrations of cadmium.

Changes in photosynthetic gas exchange parameters in sassafras under cadmium stress

With the increase in Cd concentration, the Pn in the sassafras’ leaves showed a downward trend. Significant reductions were found in the Pn of sassafras’ leaves by 1.60%, 14.35%, 44.74% and 55.57%, respectively among treatments. The different concentrations of Cd did not significantly affect Gs, Ci or Tr. There were decreases found in Gs by 15.08%, 17.08%, 21.08% and 30.31%, respectively. Declines were also recorded in Tr by 14.29%, 30.95%, 42.86% and 38.10%, respectively. (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
figure5

Photosynthetic gas exchange parameters of sassafras leaves under different cadmium stress treatments.

The effect of Cd stress on the photosynthetic light-response curve

When the PAR was weak (PAR ≤ 200 μmol/m2/s), the Pn of leaves showed a nearly linear increasing trend, the increase in the Pn in CT was significantly higher than that in the cadmium treatments, and the increase in the Pn of Cd5, Cd20, Cd50 and Cd100 decreased with the increase in cadmium concentration. The increasing trend of the Pn of leaves slowed under different Cd concentrations when the PAR exceeded 200 μmol/m2/s. When the PAR was between 800 ~ 1800 μmol/m2/s, the Pn of leaves tended to be stable and eventually reached the light saturation point when leaf photosynthesis exhibited photoinhibition (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure6

Photosynthetic light-response curves of sassafras leaves under the different cadmium stress treatments.

The modified orthogonal hyperbolic model from Ye27 was used to fit the photosynthetic response curves of the sassafras leaves at the different cadmium concentrations, and the characteristic parameters of the light response were calculated (Table 2).

Table 2 Photosynthetic light-response parameters.

The maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pnmax) of the leaves decreased significantly with increasing Cd concentration. The highest Pnmax appeared in CT, at 9.19 μmol/m2/s; then, Pnmax decreased in the different treatments, by 37.11% (Cd5), 50.38% (Cd20), 80.20% (Cd50) and 84.22% (Cd100). The dark respiration rates (Rd) of the sassafras leaves under the different Cd concentrations were not significantly different from that of CT (Table 2).

The light compensation point (LCP) of the leaves was the highest in the Cd50 treatment and the lowest in the Cd100 treatment; however, there were no significant differences among the treatments. The light saturation point (LSP) of the leaves was the highest at Cd5 and the lowest at Cd100, and there were also no significant differences among the treatments (Table 2).

Discussion

Cadmium (Cd) is highly mobile in plant tissues and affects plant physiological growth28. This study demonstrated that Cd stress in soil had a negative influence on sassafras growth and reduced the net growth in plant height and leaf, branch and root biomass. The decrease of the net growth in plant height and biomass may have been due to the toxicity of Cd to photosynthetic organs29 and plant structure30. Under Cd stress, the biomass allocation pattern of sassafras also changed; the degree of the decline in aboveground biomass was higher than that of the decline in underground biomass, probably because cadmium stress limited the acquisition of mineral nutrients required for plants31. These effects intensified the competition for nutrients among different plant organs; therefore, the plants retained their underground biomass at the expense of aboveground biomass in order to obtain more soil nutrients and maintain normal growth. In addition, cadmium stress can limit and inhibit plant photosynthesis, which weakens their photosynthetic production capacity and ultimately reduces their biomass; these impacts were more evident on aboveground biomass than on underground biomass32.

Cd toxicity is known to cause a deleterious effect on plants by disturbing the overall physiological mechanisms of plants33. It is found that heavy metals can stimulate plants to produce more reactive oxygen species (ROS), the produced ROS react with lipids, proteins, nucleic acids and other substances, causing lipid peroxidation, membrane damage and enzyme inactivation, thereby affecting cell performance and viability34. Once the ability of the plant to clear itself is exceeded, it will also cause the plant to die. When plants are subjected to abiotic stress, H2O2, the most abundant and stable type of ROS, plays a key regulatory role in their organs and protects the plants from the harm caused by the abiotic stress35,36. The MDA content, which is an indicator of lipid peroxidation in cellular organelles, is usually upregulated in response to various external stimuli37. In this study, the H2O2 and MDA contents showed upward trends, there were no significant differences among the treatments. It might because that cadmium stress had a certain effect on the peroxidation of the inner membrane of sassafras seedlings, resulting in damage to the cell membrane structure. Some studies have noted that an increase in the activity of the protective enzyme system reduces lipid membrane peroxidation and maintains the integrity of the membrane system38. The primary antioxidant enzymes are SOD, CAT and POD. When plants are subjected to heavy metal stress, the activity of antioxidant enzymes increases gradually with increasing heavy metal concentration, but when the heavy metal concentration becomes too high, the protective enzyme system is destroyed, and enzyme activity decreases39. The resistance of antioxidant enzymes to heavy metal stress is a complex physiological process that is influenced by the plant species and by the concentration and properties of the heavy metal. In Ozfidan-Konakci C’s research, the POD content in wheat leaves increased significantly under cadmium stress, but the SOD content did not change40. In this study, SOD activity decreased among treatments compared to CT, while POD activity increased steadily with increasing cadmium concentration. These results indicated that POD was likely the main protective enzyme involved in the reactive oxygen removal system in sassafras. The results also indicate that sassafras adapts to the increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and enhances its tolerance to cadmium by adjusting the activities of SOD and POD in its organs under cadmium stress, eliminating harmful substances such as O2- and H2O2 to maintain the normal metabolism of free radicals in plants41. At the same time, the increased toxicity of Cd could inhibit the reaction ability of the antioxidant system42. However, when the cadmium content exceeded a certain range, the activities of SOD, CAT and POD in the stressed plants were inhibited, resulting in a limited ability to remove ROS and serious damage to the functional membranes and enzyme systems of the plant tissues and cells.

Pro is an important osmotic protective substance that plays an indispensable role in maintaining the normal function of cells, protecting the structure of cell membranes, and the stability of biological macromolecule structures43. Heavy metal stress impacts the water balance in plants and induces a large increase in Pro, which is involved in the osmotic regulation of cells44. Some studies have shown that a variety of abiotic stresses tend to make plants produce a large amount of Pro and accumulate Pro in their organs45,46. Plants have different pathways for the synthesis and degradation of Pro in different situations, so the effects of Pro are not completely consistent47,48. In this study, the content of Pro increased with increasing cadmium concentration, indicating that cadmium stress induced sassafras to synthesize more Pro to resist osmotic stress. SS is not only the product of plant photosynthesis but also participates in the process of plant photosynthesis, which can provide energy for the growth and development of plant organs and plays an important role in plants. SS can reduce the osmotic potential in cells and maintain cell water potential and normal metabolism49,50. In this study, compared with that in CT, the SS content declined under different concentrations of cadmium. This result may have been due to the destruction of chloroplasts and the subsequent decrease in photosynthesis with the aggravation of the degree of stress. At the same time, to resist the toxicity of heavy metals, plant tissue cells enhance their metabolic activities and consume some of the SS. Cd stress can affect the synthesis of normal proteins and the production of stress proteins. SP can increase the amount of functional protein to maintain normal physiological metabolic activities of cells, leading to the improvement of plants resistance to stress51. According to this research, as the concentration of cadmium increased, the SP content first increased and then decreased, which was similar to the research results of Ge Wei et al.52. It may be that when the cadmium content is low, mild cadmium stress causes young trees to produce more antioxidant proteins and stress proteins in response to cadmium toxicity. However, with the aggravation of cadmium stress, the protein synthesis system is damaged to a certain extent. In addition, cadmium stress inhibits plant photosynthesis, resulting in a decrease in the contents of proteins involved in ATP activities; therefore, the content of SP decreases53,54.

Photosynthesis is an important physiological process in plants. Many studies have shown that cadmium stress can inhibit plant photosynthesis and is significantly related to the degree of heavy metal stress55,56. Its effects on plant photosynthesis are mainly reflected in the destruction of chlorophyll structure and the reduction in photosynthetic pigment content, which can affect the ability of plants to photosynthesize57. The chlorophyll content is directly related to the intensity of photosynthesis and can reflect the ability of leaves to absorb and transform light energy. As the main pigment involved in photosynthesis, chlorophyll a is responsible for converting light energy into chemical energy in the light reaction center, while chlorophyll b is responsible for capturing and transmitting light energy58. In this research, the chlorophyll content first increased and then declined at increasing cadmium concentrations, which indicated that a low concentration of cadmium promotes an increase in chlorophyll content, while a high concentration of cadmium inhibits the formation of chlorophyll. This was probably due to the low concentration of Cd complexes accelerating the absorption of Mg, Fe, K and P nutrients from the soil, promoting the formation of leaf porphyrin rings, and thus increasing the chlorophyll content59.

Studies have shown that the Pn of plants generally decreases with increasing heavy metal concentration60, which is in line with our experimental results. Factors that affect the photosynthetic rate of plant leaves can be divided into stomatal factors and nonstomatal factors. Farquhar et al. proposed that to judge the factors that affect the photosynthetic rate of plants, changes in stomatal conductance and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration should be observed at the same time61. In this experiment, the Pn and Gs of sassafras leaves decreased, while the Ci increased, indicating that the photosynthetic rate of sassafras leaves was limited by nonstomatal factors.

Photosynthetic light-response parameters can reflect the photosynthetic potential, light energy utilization and light inhibition of plants under adverse conditions27,62. Pnmax can reflect the potential photosynthetic capacity of plants. The greater the value of Pnmax, the greater the photosynthetic potential of plant leaves, indicating that leaves can synthesize more photosynthetic products under the appropriate light conditions63. In this study, the Pnmax of sassafras leaves decreased significantly with increasing Cd stress, indicating that heavy metal stress significantly affected the photosynthetic capacity of the sassafras leaves. The LCP and LSP reflect the ability of plants to utilize weak light and strong light, respectively64. In this study, with the increase in Cd concentration, the LCP and LSP of sassafras leaves generally showed a decreasing trend, indicating that Cd stress weakened the ability of sassafras leaves to use both weak light and strong light. Qi’s research showed that reducing the LCP was an adaptive response of plants to a low light environment and was conducive to maintaining the carbon balance of plants under low light intensity65. Lower Rd and LCP in leaves are more conducive to reducing the consumption of photosynthetic products in leaves, thus increasing the net photosynthetic accumulation to obtain the maximum carbon accumulation63. Under cadmium stress, sassafras leaves maintained normal photosynthesis by reducing the Rd and LCP, which reflected the mechanism of the response of sassafras to cadmium stress.

Conclusions

Cd stress had negative influences on sassafras growth, as it reduced the net growth of plant height and the biomass of leaf, branch, and root. The contents of H2O2 decreased first then increased while MDA showed the opposite trend with increasing cadmium concentration, which indicated that cadmium stress had a certain effect on the peroxidation of the inner membrane of sassafras seedlings, resulting in damage to the cell membrane structure. SOD activity declined among treatment compare to CT, while POD activity increased steadily with increasing cadmium concentration, indicating that POD was likely the main protective enzyme involved in the reactive oxygen removal system in sassafras. The increase in Pro content indicated that cadmium stress induced sassafras to synthesize more Pro to resist osmotic stress. Compared to that in CT, the SS content declined under the different Cd treatments. The SP content increased with the increasing levels of cadmium stress. At increasing levels of cadmium stress, the chlorophyll content of the seedlings first increased and then decreased, and it was higher in the Cd5 and Cd20 treatments than in the CT treatment. These results reflected that Cd had photosynthesis-promoting effects at low Cd concentrations and photosynthesis-suppressing effects at high Cd concentrations. The photosynthetic gas exchange parameters and photosynthetic light-response parameters showed downward trends in the Cd treatments compared with those in CT, which reflected the inhibition of photosynthesis in sassafras due to Cd stress.

Abbreviations

Cd:

Cadmium

Chl a:

Chlorophyll a

Chl b:

Chlorophyll b

Car:

Carotenoids

Chl:

Chlorophyll

PAR:

Photosynthetically active radiation

P n :

Net photosynthetic rate

Gs :

Stomatal conductance

T r :

Transpiration rate

C i :

Intercellular CO2 concentration

LSP :

Light saturation point

Rd :

Dark respiration rate

LCP :

Light compensation point

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

POD:

Peroxidase

Pro:

Proline

SS:

Soluble sugar

SP:

Soluble protein

CAT:

Catalase

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

References

  1. 1.

    Ali, B. et al. Physiological and ultra-structural changes in Brassica napus seedlings induced by cadmium stress. Biol Plant 58(1), 131–138 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tang, Y. et al. Cadmium-accumulator straw application alleviates cadmium stress of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) by promoting pgotosynthetic activity and antioxidative enzyme activities. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 25, 30671–30679 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jia, L. et al. Hormesis effects induced by cadmium on growth and photosynthetic performance in a hyperaccumulator, Lonicera japonica. Thunb. J Plant Growth Regul 34(1), 13–21 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gallego, S. M., Benavides, M. P. (2019) Cadmium-induced oxidative and nitrosative stress in plants. Cadmium Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants. Elsevier, pp. 233–274.

  5. 5.

    Rizwan, M. et al. Cadmium minimization in wheat: a critical review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 130, 43–53 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zou, J. et al. Transcriptional, physiological and cytological analysis validated the roles of some key genes linked Cd stress in Salix matsudanaKoidz. Environ. Exp. Bot. 134, 116–129 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chen, H. C. et al. The effects of exogenous organic acids on the growth, photosynthesis and cellular ultrastructure of Salix variegata Franch Under Cd stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 187, 1–10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sarvajeet, S. G., Nafees, A. K. & Narendra, T. Cadmium at high dose perturbs growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism while at low dose it up regulates sulfur assimilation and antioxidant machinery in garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.). Plant Sci. 182, 112–120 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Daniel, H., Tereza, C., Tom´a, V. & Radka, P. The effect of nanoparticles on the photosynthetic pigments in cadmium-zinc interactions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(4), 4147–4151 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tian, X. et al. Measurement of metal bioaccessibility in vegetables to improve human exposure assessments: field study of soil–plant–atmosphere transfers in urban areas South China. Environ. Geochem. Health 38(6), 1283–1301 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    He, J. et al. A transcriptomic network underlies microstructural and physiological responses to cadmium in Populus× _canescens. Plant Physiol. 162, 424–439 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    He, J. et al. Cadmium tolerance in six poplar species. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20, 163–174 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    He, N. et al. Draft genome sequence of the mulberry tree Morus notabilis. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–9 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wu, P., Luo, Z. (1981) Precious sassafras of Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Forest. Sci. Technol.

  15. 15.

    Flora of China, 1982, vol. 31, p. 238.

  16. 16.

    Xiyou, C. Study on Growth of Sassafras in different Mixed ways[J]. Anhui Forest. Sci. Technol. 4, 9–11 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cheng Yong, Wu. et al. Storage test of sassafras seeds[J]. Hunan Forest. Sci. Technol. 2, 28–30 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shen, Y. et al. Study on biomass and productivity of natural secondary Sassafras Mixed Forest[J]. J. Central South Univ. Forest. Technol. 5, 26–30 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jin, Y. Q. et al. Efficient adsorption of methylene blue and lead ions in aqueous solutions by 5-sulfosalicylic acid modified lignin[J]. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 123, 50–58 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cheng, Y. F. et al. Rapid method for protein quantitation by Bradford assay after elimination of the interference of polysorbate 80[J]. Anal Biochem 494, 37–39 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Abdelgawad, H., Zinta, G., Badreldin, A. H., et al. (2019) Maize roots and shoots show distinct profiles of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense under heavy metal toxicity[J]. Environ. Pollut., p. 113705

  22. 22.

    Donahue, J. L. et al. Responses of antioxidants to paraquat in pea leaves (relationships to resistance) [J]. Plant Physiol 113(1), 249–257 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Merey, H. A. et al. Validated UPLC method for the determination of guaiphenesin, oxeladin citrate, diphenhydramine, and sodium benzoate in their quaternary mixture used in treatment of cough, in the presence of guaiphenesin-related substance (guaiacol)[J]. Chem. Pap. 72(9), 2247–2254 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Beers, R. F. & Sizer, I. W. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase[J]. J. Biol. Chem. 195(1), 133–140 (1952).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhao, F. J., Jiang, R. F., Dunham, S. J. & McGrath, S. P. Cadmium uptake, translocation and tolerance in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. New Phytol. J. 172, 646–654 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lichtenthaler, H. K. & Wellburn, A. R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Analysis 11(5), 591–592 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zipiao, Ye. Andvances in models of photosynthetic response to light and CO2[J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 06, 727–740 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Saidi, I. et al. Oxidative damages induced by short-term exposure to cadmium in bean plants: protective role of salicylic acid. S Afr. J. Bot. 85, 32–38 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Anwaar, S. A. et al. Silicon (Si) alleviates cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fromzinc (Zn) toxicity stress by limiting Zn uptake and oxidative damage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 3441–3450 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fuzhong, Wu. et al. Effects of cadmium stress on the growth, nutrient accumulation, distribution and utilization of Osmanthus fragrans. J. Plant Ecol. 34(10), 1220–1226 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cengiz, K., Nudrat, A., Akram, M., Ashraf, M., Nasser, A., Parvaiz, A. (2020) Exogenously supplied silicon (Si) improves cadmium tolerance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) by upregulating the synthesis of nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide[J]. J. Biotechnol., p. 316

  32. 32.

    Wang, H. et al. Effects of cadmium stress at different concentrations on photosynthesis, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities in maize seedlings [J]. J. Plant Nutrition Fertilizer 14(01), 36–42 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Awasthi, P., Mahajan, V., Jamwal, V. L. et al. (2016) Cloning and expression analysis of chalcone synthase gene from Coleus forskohlii. J. Genet.

  34. 34.

    Ahmad, P., Jaleel, C. A., Salem, M. A., Nabi, G. & Sharma, S. Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 30(3), 161–175 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chen, H. et al. H2O2 mediates nitrate-induced iron chlorosis by regulating iron homeostasis in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 767–781 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kohli, S. K., Khanna, K., Bhardwaj, R., Abd_Alla, E. F., Corpas, F. J. (2019) Assessment of subcellular ros and no metabolism in higher plants: multifunctional signaling molecules. Antioxidants, vol 8, no 12

  37. 37.

    Meng Jie, A. & Hai Jiang, W. Effects of modifiers on the growth, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzymes of cotton under cadmium toxicity. J. Plant Growth Regulat. 38, 1196–1205 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wei, X. et al. Effects of different breaking dormancy ways on the photosynthetic characteristics and activities of protective enzymes of ‘misty’ blueberry leaves. Sci. Agric. Sin. 48(22), 4517–4528 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chaabene, Z. et al. Copper toxicity and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) seedling tolerance: monitoring of related biomarkers. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 37(3), 797–806 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ozfidan-Konakci, C. et al. The humic acid-induced changes in the water status, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant defense systems of wheat leaves with cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 155, 66–75 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liu, Q. S. et al. Transcriptomic responses of dove tree (Davida involucrata Baill) to heat stress at the seedling stage[J]. Forest 10(8), 656 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yang, L. P. et al. Effect of Cd on growth, physiological response, Cd subcellular distribution and chemical forms of Koelreuteria paniculate[J]. Ecotox Environ. Safe 160, 10–18 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zhang, Y. L. et al. The physiological characteristics of ornamental kale for cold resistance[J]. Act. Agric. 31(4), 168–176 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rady, M. M. & Hemida, K. A. Modulation of cadmium toxicity and enhancing cadmium-tolerance in wheat seedlings by exogenous application of polyamines. Ecotoxicol Environ. Saf 119, 178–185 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chen, Y. H. et al. Study on the characteristics of proline and active oxygen metabolism in red sea under salt stress [J]. J. Xiamen Univ. Nat. Sci. 43(03), 402–405 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Niu, M. G. et al. Effects of drought, waterlogging and low temperature stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of wheat [J]. Seed 04, 17–19 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Deng, F.-F., Yang, S.-L. & Gong, M. Regulation of proline metabolism in abiotic plants by cell signaling molecules [J]. J. Plant Physiol. 51(10), 1573–1582 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Samuel, D. et al. Proline inhibits aggre-gation during protein refolding[J]. Protein Sci. 9(2), 344–352 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Abd Allah, E. F. et al. Calcium application enhances growth and alleviates the damaging effects induced by Cd stress in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). J. Plant Interact. 12(1), 237–243 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zhang, X. D. et al. Annotation and characterization of Cd-responsive metal transporter genes in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Bio Metals 31(1), 107–121 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chen, K. et al. Physiological response and cold resistance evaluation of the leaves of Parashorea chinensis seedlings to low temperature stress[J]. J NW For Univ 34(3), 67–73 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ge, W. & Jiao, Y. Changes of soluble protein content of two poplar trees under cadmium stress [J]. Modern Agric. Sci. Technol. 1, 199–200 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Aina, R. et al. Thiol-petide level and proteomic changes in response to cadmium toxicity in Oryza sativa L. rotts[J]. Environ. Exp. Botany 59(3), 381–392 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Xu, J. J. et al. Effects of Cd stress on antioxidant enzymes activity of Sonchus asper L. Hill and Zea mays L. in intercropping system[J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. Nat Sci. Ed. 30(2), 348–355 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hendrik, K., Frithjof, K. & Martin, S. Environmental relevance of heavy metal-substituted chlorophylls using the example of water plants[J]. J. Exp. Bot. 47(2), 259–266 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Chen, X. X. et al. Effects of thallium and cadmiun stress on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Arundinacea[J]. Guangxi Plants 39(6), 743–751 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ahanger, M. A., U Aziz, Alsahli, A. A., Alyemeni, M. N., Ahmad, P. (2020). Combined kinetin and spermidine treatments ameliorate growth and photosynthetic inhibition in vigna angularis by up-regulating antioxidant and nitrogen metabolism under cadmium stress. Biomolecules, vol. 10, no 1

  58. 58.

    Sun Xiaolin, Xu. et al. Response of photosynthetic pigments in plant leaves to shading[J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 34(8), 989–999 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Chen, X.-X. et al. Effects of cadmium stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of asparagus spears[J]. Plants Guangxi 39(6), 743–751 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lu, Y. et al. Effects of heavy metals on photosynthetic and physiological growth characteristics of halophytes[J]. Acta Botanica Northwestern Sinica 31(2), 370–376 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Farquhar, G. D. & Sharkey, T. D. Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis[J]. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33(1), 317–345 (1982).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Haizhen, W. et al. Response of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics to high temperature in heteromorphous leaves of Populus eureka [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin. 9, 100–109 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Liyuan, Li. et al. Photosynthetic light response simulation of leaves of Quercus variabilis and Robinia pseudoacacia under different light environments[J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 29(7), 2295–2306 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Wang, F.-K. et al. Photosynthetic light response curve of Populus microphylla under different slope orientation[J]. Water Soil Conservat. Res. 22(113), 182–187 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Xin, Qi., Qunfang, C. & Yulong, F. Adaptation of photosynthesis to growth light intensity in seedlings of three tree species of Putaoia in tropical rain forest [J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 01, 34–41 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Hu and Prof. Zhang for critical reading of the manuscript and fruitful corrections. We would also thank all the participants in this project.

Funding

The project has been funded by the Breeding Research Project of Sichuan Province during the 13th Five-year Plan period (2016 NZ0098-10), Key Project of Sichuan Education Department (13ZA0246).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.Z. developed the project and write the manuscript, which was read and revised by all co-authors. Fieldwork was performed by H.Z., J.G., Q.L. and X.Z. Laboratory analyses were performed by H.Z. and X.Z. H.Z., J.G.and Q.L. performed the statistics and data evaluation. H.H. and J.Z. were both corresponding authors who gave advices and provided funding for this project. All authors listed have made substantial, direct and intellectual contributions to the work, and have approved it for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongling Hu or Jian Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Guan, J., Liang, Q. et al. Effects of cadmium stress on growth and physiological characteristics of sassafras seedlings. Sci Rep 11, 9913 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89322-0

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing