Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Exposure to airborne bacteria depends upon vertical stratification and vegetation complexity


Exposure to biodiverse aerobiomes supports human health, but it is unclear which ecological factors influence exposure. Few studies have investigated near-surface green space aerobiome dynamics, and no studies have reported aerobiome vertical stratification in different urban green spaces. We used columnar sampling and next generation sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, combined with geospatial and network analyses to investigate urban green space aerobiome spatio-compositional dynamics. We show a strong effect of habitat on bacterial diversity and network complexity. We observed aerobiome vertical stratification and network complexity that was contingent on habitat type. Tree density, closer proximity, and canopy coverage associated with greater aerobiome alpha diversity. Grassland aerobiomes exhibited greater proportions of putative pathogens compared to scrub, and also stratified vertically. We provide novel insights into the urban ecosystem with potential importance for public health, whereby the possibility of differential aerobiome exposures appears to depend on habitat type and height in the airspace. This has important implications for managing urban landscapes for the regulation of aerobiome exposure.


Exposure to biodiverse environmental microbiomes—the diverse consortium microorganisms in a given environment—plays an important role in human health1,2,3,4,5. From an early age, a complex network of environmental microorganisms supports the development and regulation of immunity6. Indeed, exposure to a wide range of microorganisms is thought to strengthen our response to noxious stimuli (e.g., pathogens) and reduce the likelihood that our immune systems will be oversensitive to innocuous agents, such as dust particles, pollen, and our own cells—the latter manifesting as autoimmunity7,8,9.

Urbanisation and loss of macro-biodiversity are linked to loss of microbial diversity, which could negatively impact the health-supporting microbial communities residing in and on human bodies—the human microbiome10,11. This loss of microbial diversity underpins the biodiversity hypothesis, which draws a link between concurrent global megatrends of biodiversity loss (including microorganisms)12 and rapid increases in noncommunicable diseases (NCDs)13. A recent study empirically tested this hypothesis and found that exposure to plant diversity and associated microbial communities significantly correlated with reduced risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia by promoting immune maturation14.

Furthermore, biodiverse environments could supplement human microbiomes with functionally important microorganisms. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are produced by certain bacteria as metabolic by-products and are known to play important roles in supporting human health. For example, the SCFA butyrate is linked to the inhibition of intestinal tumours15 and atherosclerosis16, as well as supporting bone formation17 and promoting epithelial integrity18. Such microorganisms may be transferred through aerobiomes. For example, in a randomised controlled mouse study, a putative soil-associated butyrate-producing bacteria was found to be supplemented in mice gut microbiota following trace-level airborne soil dust exposures and subsequently linked to reduced anxiety-like behaviour5.

The aerobiome––the collection of microorganisms in a given airspace––is an important source of environmental microorganisms19,20,21. Despite this importance, only limited studies have investigated the dynamics of near-surface aerobiomes in urban green spaces. Mhuireach et al.22 showed that aerobiomes in urban green and grey spaces had distinct compositions. Subsequent studies have shown vegetation type has a potential modulating effect on aerobiome diversity and composition23,24. Stewart et al.25found that aerobiomes varied in composition and function between urban and suburban sites. Mhuireach et al. (2019) identified localised influences on aerobiomes, including weather and land management22,26. Our recent work has also demonstrated aerobiome vertical stratification between ground level and 2 m heights in an urban green space27. Together, these studies suggest that individuals may be exposed to different aerobiomes depending on the type of habitat visited and human-scale height-based variation in environmental aerobiomes. Consequently, understanding the effects of habitat and height––and their interactions—on aerobiomes could have important implications for public health.

There is growing recognition that urban green spaces are important for human health and wellbeing through provision of psychosocial and biological benefits28,29,30,31,32. Gaining a deeper understanding of urban green space aerobiome exposure potential could inform public health and environmental management strategies in the future. In this study, we used an innovative columnar sampling method to sample aerobiome bacterial communities in three urban green space habitat types in the Adelaide Parklands, South Australia. These habitats included amenity grasslands, woodland/scrub (dominated by native Eucalyptus spp. trees and shrubs; henceforth referred to as ‘scrub’), and bare ground habitat; each is a typical urban green space habitat. We conducted next generation sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene to characterise the diversity, composition and network complexity of aerobiomes. We also applied geospatial analytical methods to explore the potential influence of trees on the micro-biodiversity of aerobiomes. Our primary objectives were to: (a) assess aerobiome composition and micro-biodiversity differences between the three habitats; (b) compare aerobiome vertical stratification between the different habitats; (c) assess whether tree density, distance to trees, and tree canopy coverage influenced bacterial alpha diversity; and, (d) to assess any differences in known pathogenic bacterial taxa between habitats and sampling heights.


Bacterial communities were dominated by three key phyla in all three habitats: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria, however, abundance differed depending on height (Fig. S1) (full description of sequencing reads in Supplementary Materials, Appendix B). We now present the results in order of the objectives (a–d) set out in the Introduction.

Comparison of bacterial alpha diversity between habitats

We found that bacterial alpha diversity of the soil differed significantly between habitats (ANOVA F = 3.95, df = 1, p = 0.03) (Fig. 1). The soil microbiome from the scrub habitat was significantly more biodiverse than the grassland habitat (Tukey multiple comparison of means test; scrub x̅ = 5.78; grassland x̅ = 5.46; adjusted p = 0.02). We also found that bacterial alpha diversity of the air differed significantly between bare ground and scrub habitats (Chi-squared = 11.3, df = 1, p ≤ 0.01), with the scrub aerobiome being more biodiverse than the bare ground. Aerobiome alpha diversity of scrub and grassland were also significantly different (Chi-squared = 24.8, df = 1, p ≤ 0.01), and the scrub aerobiome was the most biodiverse. No significant difference was observed in alpha diversity between bare ground and grassland habitats (Chi-squared = 0.46, df = 1, p ≤ 0.49).

Figure 1

Box/violin plots of Shannon alpha diversity scores for each habitat; bare ground, grassland, and scrub. Panel (a) shows inter-habitat bacterial alpha diversity for soil samples, and panel (b) shows inter-habitat bacterial alpha diversity for aerobiome samples. Plots also display mean and median values, interquartile range and kernel density estimation indicated by the shape of the violin (Shannon alpha diversity values for each habitat, divided into days and sites, are in Supplementary Materials, Appendix C, Table S1). We also tested for mean alpha diversity differences between dates and sites, showing that sampling dates and individual sites were generally not a factor in alpha diversity variation with nearly 90% of comparisons showing non-significant results (Appendix C, Table S2).

Comparison of bacterial beta diversity between habitats

We observed clear differences in aerobiome compositions (beta diversity) (PERMANOVA, df = 2, F = 3.7, R2 = 0.07, p ≤ 0.01, permutations = 999) and soil samples (PERMANOVA, df = 2, F = 6.8, R2 = 0.36, p ≤ 0.01, permutations = 999 among habitats (Fig. 2). For air samples, all habitats displayed significantly distinct bacterial communities, where habitat type explained 7% of the variation in bacterial community composition. However, there was significant heterogeneity in dispersion (PERMDISP, F = 13, p ≤ 0.01). For soil only, habitat type explained 36% of the variation in bacterial community composition, however, this increased significantly to 75% and 74% when comparing scrub to grassland and scrub to bare ground, respectively (PERMANOVA, df = 5, F = 7, R2 = 0.75 and 0.74, p ≤ 0.01). There was no significant heterogeneity in dispersion (PERMDISP, F = 2, p = 0.07). We carried out PERMANOVA analysis for the beta diversity/community composition (using the centre log ratio transformation) for each site and date prior to running the broader compositional analysis. This step showed that there was no statistically significant variation in bacterial community composition between either dates or sites (Supplementary Materials, Appendix C, Table S2).

Figure 2

Upper panels show air samples only, whereby (a) is a boxplot of dispersion (spread); (b) ordination of bacterial communities for all habitats (BG bare ground, GR grassland, SC scrub), ellipses represent Euclidian distance from the centre—with the radius equal to the confidence level (0.95); and (c) ordination of dispersion by Aitchison Distance. Lower panels show soil samples only, whereby (d) is a boxplot of dispersion; (e) ordination of bacterial communities for all habitats, ellipses represent Euclidian distance from the centre; and (f) shows an ordination of dispersion by Aitchison Distance.

Vertical stratification: alpha diversity

For the bare ground habitat, we observed a strong negative correlation between alpha diversity (air and soil for all sites/dates) and sampling height from ground level to 2 m (Pearson’s r = -0.75, df = 39, p ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 3a). Alpha diversity (Shannon scores) ranged from 1.2 to 5.93 and was highest at soil level, followed by lower air sampling levels (0.0–0.5 m) and upper sampling levels (1.0–2.0 m), respectively. Analysis of air-only samples also showed a significant negative correlation between height and bacterial alpha diversity, demonstrating vertical stratification in this bare ground habitat (Pearson’s r = − 0.60, df = 30 p ≤ 0.01).

For the grassland aerobiome, the correlation was weak and not significant, indicating that vertical stratification was not detected in this habitat (Pearson’s r = 0.03, df = 34, p = 0.86). When analysing air and soil (for all sites/dates) together, we observed a significant negative correlation between alpha diversity and sampling height from ground level to 2 m (Pearson’s r = − 0.38, df = 43, p = 0.01) (Fig. 3b). Alpha diversity ranged from 1.2 to 5.9 and was highest at soil level.

In the scrub aerobiome, we observed a significant negative correlation between alpha diversity (air and soil for all sites/dates) and sampling height from ground level to 2 m (Pearson’s r = − 0.59, df = 39, p ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 3c). Bacterial alpha diversity in the scrub habitat ranged from 1 to 6 (Shannon score) and was highest at soil level, followed by lower air sampling levels (0.0–0.5 m) and upper sampling levels (1.0–2.0 m), respectively. Analysis of air-only samples showed a significant negative correlation between height and bacterial alpha diversity, demonstrating vertical stratification in this scrub habitat (Pearson’s r = − 0.38, df = 30, p = 0.03). See Supplementary Materials, Appendix B, Table S3 for a statistical comparison of data between individual dates and sites (90% were non-significant relationships, indicating low inter-date and site variation).

Figure 3

Box/violin plots of Shannon alpha diversity scores for each sampling height including soil and for each habitat: (a) bare ground; (b) grassland; and (c) scrub. Plots also display mean values, interquartile range and kernel density estimation, and silhouettes of humans for perspective.

Vertical stratification: beta diversity

Sampling heights in the bare ground habitat displayed disparate bacterial compositions. Sampling height explained 29% of the variation in bacterial community composition when all air sampling heights were included (PERMANOVA df = 4, F = 3.67, R2 = 0.29, p ≤ 0.01, permutations = 999). Analysis of air samples for the bare ground habitat in isolation showed that sampling height still explained 25% of the variation in bacterial community composition (df = 3, F = 3.06, R2 = 0.25, p ≤ 0.01, permutations = 999).

Air sampling heights in the grassland habitat displayed disparate bacterial communities to the soil. Sampling height explained 24% of the variation in bacterial community composition when all air sampling heights were included (PERMANOVA df = 4, F = 3.17, R2 = 0.24, p ≤ 0.01, permutations = 999). However, analysis of grassland air samples in isolation showed that sampling height only explained 9% of the variation in bacterial community composition and was not statistically significant (df = 3, F = 1.06, R2 = 0.09, p = 0.24, permutations = 999).

Sampling heights in the scrub habitat displayed disparate bacterial communities. Sampling height explained 22% of the variation in bacterial community composition when all air sampling heights and soil were included (PERMANOVA df = 4, F = 2.9, R2 = 0.22, p ≤ 0.01, permutations = 999). Analysis of air samples in isolation showed that sampling height still explained 11% of the variation in bacterial community composition (df = 3, F = 1.30, R2 = 0.11, p = 0.03, permutations = 999). See Supplementary Materials, Appendix C, Fig. S2 and Tables S4S6 for more information.

Vertical stratification: aerobiome network analysis

In spite of differences in bacterial community composition and alpha diversity among the three study sites, network analyses showed an increase in the community complexity and interactions, defined by node degree and network size, at lower heights as compared to higher heights (Fig. 4). Bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the scrub habitat at 0–0.5 m heights had the highest node degree, while the OTUs in the grassland habitat 1–2 m had the lowest node degree. At lower heights, the average association of any OTU in the grassland was less (node degree = 2.7) than the average association of OTUs for scrub (node degree = 4.9) and bare ground (node degree = 4.7) habitats. At upper heights, node degree for OTUs was highest for bare ground (2.7) followed by scrub (1.8) and grassland (1.7). Evaluation of link type, either positive or negative links, suggested a positive association among most OTUs, except for scrub 1–2 m which only had a small number of negative associations (Fig. 4). Comparisons of modularity between heights across the study sites suggested an increase in the network modularity at higher heights, despite the decrease in network connectance and node degree. Percentage of change in the modularity between heights was highest in the grassland (~ 50%), although there were fewer nodes per module.

Figure 4

Association networks of bacterial OTUs for two vertical stratifications: 1.0–2.0 m (top panel) and 0.0–0.5 m (bottom panel). Node colour represents phylum, and node are labelled at the family level. Blue links represent positive associations, and red links represent negative associations.

The relationship between tree metrics and bacterial alpha diversity

In the air samples, we found strong positive correlations between tree density (based on count of trees in a given radius) and bacterial alpha diversity in the 10 m radius (Spearman’s rs = 0.67, β = 0.67 (0.4–0.8), p ≤ 0.01) and 25 m radius (rs = 0.54, β = 0.54 (0.2–0.7), p ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 5a,b). We also found significant moderate positive correlations between tree density and bacterial alpha diversity in the 50 m (Spearman’s rs = 0.46, β = 0.46 (0.1–0.7), p = 0.00) and 100 m radii (Spearman’s rs = 0.50, β = 0.50 (0.2–0.7), p ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 5c,d). Relationships between tree density and bacterial alpha diversity in soil were not statistically significant (Spearman’s rs = 0.33, p = 0.38).

Figure 5

Scatterplots of Spearman’s correlations (rs) between bacterial alpha diversity (for all habitats and air-only samples) and tree count within each buffer radius: (a) 10 m radius from sampling points, (b) 25 m radius, (c) 50 m radius, and (d) 100 m radius. X-axis shows count of trees within buffer radii. Y-axis shows bacterial alpha diversity of air-only samples using the Shannon diversity index (H). Green shading indicates the 95% confidence intervals for each linear regression. The buffer radii are in the central aerial image and the corresponding spatial rings are in the plots. Inset also shows bootstrap results (β) with 2.5% and 97.5% slopes.

We found significant moderate negative correlations between distance to nearest trees (from sampling stations) and aerobiome alpha diversity (Spearman’s rs = − 0.58, β = − 0.58 (− 0.7 to − 0.3), p ≤ 0.01), and soil bacterial alpha diversity (Spearman’s rs = − 0.40, β = − 0.40 (− 0.6 to − 0.1), p = 0.03) (Fig. 6a,b, respectively). Moreover, we found significant moderate positive correlations between tree canopy coverage and bacterial alpha diversity of the air in the 10 m (Spearman’s rs = 0.51, β = 0.51 (0.2–0.7), p ≤ 0.01), 25 m (Spearman’s rs = 0.66, β = 0.66 (0.4–0.8), p ≤ 0.01), and 100 m radii (Spearman’s rs = 0.7, β = 0.7 (0.5–0.8), p ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 6c,d,f, respectively). There was a negative correlation between canopy cover and bacterial alpha diversity in the 50 m radius that was not statistically significant (Spearman’s rs = − 0.27, β = − 0.27 (− 0.6 to 0.2), p = 0.17) (Fig. 6e).

Figure 6

The upper panels show scatterplots of Spearman’s correlations (rs) between bacterial alpha diversity (for all habitats) and distance to nearest trees: (a) air-only samples, and (b) soil-only samples. X-axis shows distance (m) to nearest trees from sampling points. The lower panels show scatterplots of Spearman’s correlations between bacterial alpha diversity (for all habitats) and tree canopy coverage within the sampling point radii: (c) 10 m, (d) 25 m, (e) 50 m, and (f) 100 m. These relate to air-only samples. X-axis shows tree canopy coverage (m2). Y-axis for both upper and lower panels shows bacterial alpha diversity of samples according to the Shannon diversity index (H). Coloured shading indicates the 95% confidence intervals for each linear regression. Inset also shows bootstrap results (β) with 2.5% and 97.5% slopes. N.S (not significant).

Differentially abundant and notable taxa

There were 53 differentially abundant genera across habitat types (based on log‐twofold‐change with adjusted p ≤ 0.05). The top three, for example, in the scrub habitat were: Gillisia, Sphingobium, and Kutzneria; in grassland: Parvibaculum, BSV43, and Pseudomonas; and in bare ground: Rudanella, Bacteroides, and Actinomyces. We also observed vertical stratification of differentially abundant taxa and at the putative species level. After unclassified taxa were removed, we confirmed identity (100% match) via Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) against the NCBI database33. In the bare ground habitat, we found 30 differentially abundant taxa assigned at the putative species level. Sixteen of these significantly decreased in relative abundance with sampling height and 14 significantly increased (p ≤ 0.01). In the grassland habitat, we found 40 differentially abundant taxa assigned at the putative species level. Thirty-two of these significantly decreased with sampling height and 8 significantly increased (p ≤ 0.01). In the scrub habitat, we found 16 differentially abundant taxa assigned at the putative species level. Ten of these significantly increased with sampling height and 6 significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.01). Using BLAST and a literature search, we found putative differentially abundant human pathogens in each habitat (Fig. 7). A 2-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction showed a significant difference in proportions of identifiable pathogenic species between grassland and scrub (Chi-squared = 5.57, df = 1, p ≤ 0.02) but not between other habitats, where grassland samples exhibited significantly greater proportions of identifiable pathogenic species compared to scrub. Moreover, 87% of these significantly decreased with sampling height based on log‐twofold‐change differential analysis (p ≤ 0.01). These taxa contain bacteria that have been associated with a number of diseases, including infective endocarditis (Rothia mucilaginosa)34 and gut mucosal damage (Prevotella copri)35. More information on these diseases can be found in Supplementary Materials, Appendix D, Fig. S3.

Figure 7

Potentially pathogenic and differentially abundant species for each habitat and their relative abundance for each sampling height. More details on the diseases these pathogens may cause are in Supplementary Materials, Appendix D, Fig. S3.

Environmental metadata

In terms of the environmental metadata, there was only one significant association with bacterial alpha diversity; aerobiome alpha diversity decreased significantly in scrub habitat as windspeed increased (Spearman’s rs = − 0.88, β = − 0.88 (− 0.98 to − 0.5), p ≤ 0.01) (full details in Supplementary Materials, Appendix C, Table S7).


Here we show that aerobiome alpha and beta diversity (community composition) differed significantly between urban green space habitat type, and that aerobiome diversity, composition and network complexity also stratified vertically. The level to which this occurred was dependent on habitat type. Therefore, potential bacterial exposure levels and transfer loads to humans will likely differ depending on habitat type as well a person’s height and behaviour. We also confirmed low variation in bacterial alpha and beta diversity between sampling dates and sites (Appendix C). Our results confirmed that more trees, closer proximity to trees, and greater canopy coverage associate with higher aerobiome diversity, which could have important implications for landscape management and public health as growing emphasis is placed on designing and managing green spaces for wellbeing36. We also found that grassland samples exhibited significantly greater proportions of identifiable pathogenic bacteria compared to scrub, and their abundance decreased significantly with sampling height. Our study was conducted only in the Adelaide Parklands, South Australia and therefore may not be representative of urban green spaces and climatic zones in other areas. Future work should explore these trends in additional geographical, socioeconomic, cultural areas to understand both generalisability and opportunities to optimise green space exposure for health benefits.

Aerobiome compositional differences between habitats

The scrub habitat exhibited the most biodiverse aerobiome in our study. This corroborates other studies that suggest that environmental microbiomes are more biodiverse in urban habitats with more complex vegetation communities37,38. Growing evidence suggests that exposure to biodiverse environmental microbiomes could have important implications for human health5,14,39. For example, environmental microbiomes are essential in the development and regulation of immunity1,6, and soil-derived butyrate-producing bacteria may supplement gut bacteria and have anxiety-reducing effects5. Importantly, urban green space exposure can result in transmission of environmentally-derived bacteria to the skin and airways21. Furthermore, a recent study showed that transfer of bacteria from biodiverse environments enhanced immunoregulatory pathways in children40. Consequently, environments with different levels of bacterial diversity may affect the potentiality of bacterial exposure levels and transfer loads, warranting further research. We found differentially abundant putative pathogenic taxa and showed significant differences in proportions between grassland and scrub habitat samples. In other words, amenity grassland seemed to exhibit a significantly greater proportion of (identifiable) pathogenic species compared to scrub samples. However, considerably more research is needed to fully explore the validity and generalisability of these results. As with many microbial ecology studies, only identifiable bacterial taxa were used in the differential abundance and analyses that identified the pathogenic taxa (i.e., unclassified taxa were removed). This could result in recording bias with implications for validity.

Our results suggest that tree density, distance to nearest trees, and tree canopy cover could have a considerable influence on aerobiome alpha diversity. This corroborates reports of trees acting as stationary vectors, spreading bacterial cells in the air41. Complex plant detritus (leaf litter) and organic matter at the base of trees, and corresponding soil-microbe systems, may also contribute to tree-associated aerobiomes. The number of trees and amount of canopy coverage within a given radius correlated strongly with alpha diversity. Furthermore, negative correlations were shown between distance to nearest trees and bacterial alpha diversity for air and soil. This supports the results of the tree density associations and suggests that closeness to trees could be important. These results could have important implications for landscape management and public health. Indeed, there have been widespread calls to improve urban ecosystem services by augmenting tree coverage (e.g., to help reduce urban heat island effects42, support wildlife43,44, improve sleep45,46, and capture precipitation to reduce flood risk47). There is also a need to restore complex vegetation communities and host-microbiota interactions that provide multifunctional roles in urban ecosystems37,48,49. An important limitation in our study was that tree species and structural diversity metrics were not used. These additional measures could have enriched the quality of analysis and implications of our results and further research that takes these factors into account is needed. However, our findings suggest additional co-benefits from increasing urban tree coverage due to its potential to mediate aerobiome alpha diversity. Our results also corroborate other studies showing microbial alpha diversity increasing along densely-urban to semi-natural environmental gradients50,51.

Our results suggest that aerobiome beta diversity (compositional differences) differs between habitats. The results imply that microbial communities in the soil of the scrub habitat are significantly different to bare ground and grassland, which are more compositionally aligned. It is possible that bacterial homogeneity between grassland and bare ground is attributed to homogeneity of vegetation complexity52. In other words, phyllosphere (total above-ground portion of plants) and rhizosphere (soil root zone) presence and complexity create conditions for different microbial relationships and thus compositional disparity with less botanically-complex or depauperate habitats38,39. Taken together with the alpha diversity results, significantly more bacterial species and unique communities exists in scrub habitat samples compared to grassland and bare ground samples. This could mean that humans are exposed to a greater diversity of bacteria in the scrub habitat. Future studies should focus on the functional relevance of these findings. Moreover, combining samples from across consecutive days has limitations in that uncertainty increases. Although our PERMANOVA tests showed significantly low variation across dates and sites, future work should increase inter-date sample sizes and apply uncertainty-reducing methods such as mixed effect models.

Aerobiome vertical stratification

In our study, vertical stratification in bacterial alpha and beta diversity occurred in the bare ground and scrub habitat. However, for the grassland aerobiome, both alpha and beta diversity were relatively stable as height increased. This is the first study to demonstrate that aerobiome vertical stratification is contingent on habitat type, which is important for potential human exposure. As mentioned, urban green space exposure can result in transfer of environmental bacteria to the skin and respiratory tract21, and our study shows that the composition and diversity of aerobiome bacteria may differ between heights (from ground level to 2 m). Consequently, there could be different bacterial exposure levels and transfer loads depending on a person’s height and activity27, however, further confirmatory research is needed. Our results suggest that this may not be the case in amenity grassland where bacterial alpha and beta diversity exhibited high levels of homogeneity among heights. Further research is required to determine the reasons for the lack of vertical stratification in grassland. However, we hypothesise that lower baseline diversity, bacterial resources, openness and airflow in this habitat may be contributing factors. Our study also provides some evidence that different urban green space habitats and heights may not only affect exposure levels and transfer loads of bacterial diversity, but also the presence of notable and potentially pathogenic species for humans. The relative abundance of pathogens identified in the grassland habitat decreased significantly with sampling height. It is possible that a number of these potential pathogens may originate from larger air-sheds (consistent with increasing relative abundance with height), however grasslands may have lesser capacity, compared to scrub or bare ground, to present barriers to this broader airflow or contribute to a more locally distinctive aerobiome. These findings highlight the need for further empirical studies focusing on functional interactions in the environment-aerobiome-health axis. Future studies should also try to control for factors such as human presence/movement through the study sites.

Our network analyses also provided evidence to support aerobiome vertical stratification. We saw a decrease in bacterial interactions and network complexities with increased network modularity at higher heights compared to lower heights across habitats, which might be attributed to reduced bacterial diversity with sampling height. This pattern might be due to increasing influence, with increasing height, of diluted and somewhat homogenised aerobiomes from larger airsheds, representing the physical mixing of air (and therefore aerobiomes) from multiple different and distant ecological sources. Increased modularity with reduced network size and interactions may also indicate the existence of relatively simplified, yet modular bacterial communities at higher heights. This could be the function of sparse food resources, especially if associations in the networks reflect niche-based interactions. Increased modularity indicates the presence of dense connections between bacteria within modules but sparse connections between bacteria in different modules, whereas reduced connectance means reduced probability of interactions between any pair of bacteria. Increased modularity with reduced connectance often indicates ecological stability53. Moreover, presence of mostly positive associations might also suggest cooperation for resources or lack of competition among the interacting OTUs in the community. While association-based networks allow a depiction of potential interactions among OTUs and portray community structure, they do not separate niche-based and biological interactions. Experiments with cultures are recommended if future researchers wish to dissociate interaction types and understand the biological mechanisms behind such interactions and network complexity. This action could be important to gain a greater ecological understanding of aerobiome assembly (including vertical stratification), dynamics, and the potentiality of bacterial exposure. Our results provide strong evidence that vertical stratification is a key factor not only in aerobiome diversity and composition, but also in aerobiome interactions, community structure and complexity.

In conclusion, our study provides evidence that bacterial alpha and beta diversity differed significantly between habitats, with scrub habitat providing the most biodiverse aerobiomes. We provide evidence supporting the presence of aerobiome vertical stratification in bacterial community diversity, composition and complexity, which also differed in a habitat-dependent manner. Our results confirmed that more trees, closer proximity to trees, and greater canopy coverage associated with higher alpha diversity of the aerobiome. Finally, we found that grassland samples exhibited significantly greater proportions of identifiable putative pathogenic bacteria compared to scrub, and their richness decreased significantly with sampling height. As discussed, there is growing evidence to suggest that exposure to biodiverse aerobiomes may contribute towards the development and regulation of immunity and support mental health1,4,5,6. Gaining a greater understanding of bacterial transmission routes, exposure levels, transfer loads, and downstream health implications is required. This aerobiome characterisation study provides novel insights into the urban ecosystem to help encourage further empirical investigations. Future research should focus on the functional interactions between humans and the aerobiome. Although additional research is required, our findings also support calls to increase urban tree cover. Exploring the mediatory roles of trees in aerobiome compositional and functional diversity could have important implications for landscape management and public health.

Materials and methods

Site selection

Our study was undertaken in the southern Adelaide Parklands (Kaurna Warra Pintyanthi), South Australia, which comprised nine vegetated plots that spanned approx. 18 ha (central geographic coordinates: latitude − 34.937866, longitude 138.60747). The nine plots included three amenity grasslands, three scrub, and three bare ground (exposed soil) habitats.

There were several justifications for selecting this site: (1) the southern Parklands occur within the Upper Outwash Plain soil boundary (coalescing alluvial soil, draining the Eden Fault Block), which provided broad consistency in soil geochemistry; (2) a single section of the Parklands provided control over potential micro-geographic variation effects on the aerobiome (e.g., distance to coast, elevation, orientation, aspect, and dominant vegetation communities); (3) the Parkland habitats are representative of the types of green spaces that urban residents are regularly exposed to when commuting or recreating; and, (4) the City of Adelaide provided guidance in the selection process, identifying accessible (and inaccessible) plots.

We defined the boundaries of the nine plots (as polygons) in QGIS 3 (v3.0.2) in conjunction with the City of Adelaide. Using spatial shapefiles for the plot boundaries, we generated random point algorithms to provide random sampling points within each of the nine study plots (Fig. 8a). We recorded geographic coordinates for each sampling point and programmed them into a handheld global positioning system (GPS) receiver. We operated the GPS receiver in the field, allowing us to pinpoint the locations for the sampling stations.

Figure 8

(a) Location of study sites, showing the different habitat types and randomly selected sampling locations. (be) Vertical stratification sampling station and methods used to collect (passively) air and (actively) soilborne bacteria. We installed the stations in three different habitat types in the Adelaide Parklands.

Sampling equipment

Sampling stations (Fig. 8b–e) were constructed using timber (42 mm × 28 mm × 2.7 m), steel brackets, hooks and guy-lines27. We secured lab-grade clear plastic petri dishes (bases and lids) to the sampling stations, which were used to sample the aerobiome via passive sampling22.

On-site setup

We installed the sampling stations on site between 0600 and 0800 h on the 4th, 5th and 6th November 2019. At 0800 h, sampling stations were decontaminated using a 5% Decon 90 solution. We then installed the petri dishes for passive sampling. The data loggers were also decontaminated. In the scrub habitat (defined as vegetation dominated by locally native shrubs, usually ≤ 5 m tall, with scattered trees)54, the nearest trees and shrubs were between 2 and 5 m from the sampling stations, and all trees were < 10 m height and 20–50 cm in diameter at breast height25.

Sampling protocol

We installed temperature and relative humidity data loggers at each sampling station27. We programmed each logger to record data at 8-s intervals for the entire sampling period. At the start of each sampling day, we calibrated the dataloggers using a mercury thermometer (Gerotherm) and a sling psychrometer (Sper Scientific 736700). We collected other metadata including windspeed and soil pH (Alotpower digital meter). We inserted the pH meter into the soil for a period of 1-min before taking a reading (manufacturer’s instructions). We obtained data for windspeed and direction from Adelaide’s meteorological weather station at Ngayirdapira (West Terrace): Lat: − 34.93, Lon: 138.58, Height: 29.32 m. We also used a handheld anemometer (Digitech QM-1644) to record these parameters hourly at each sampling site22.

Soil samples

We used a small, decontaminated shovel to collect topsoil samples and stored these in sterile 50 mL falcon tubes. We collected five topsoil samples (approx. 0–5 cm depth) at equidistant sampling points, 20–30 cm from the stem of each sampling station55. We pooled and homogenised the soil samples, passed them through a decontaminated 1 mm pore sieve, and placed them in new sterile and labelled 50 mL Falcon tubes. We included field controls for the soil by opening sterile falcon tubes for 60 s in the equipment box at each site56. We placed all soil and field control samples immediately into an ice box, and stored the samples in the lab at – 80 °C prior to further processing57. In total, we collected 45 soil subsamples per sampling day across nine sampling stations with three temporal replicates (on three consecutive days). We pooled and homogenised subsamples by sampling station and day, which gave a total of 27 homogenised samples (nine per sampling station) plus 9 field controls.

Aerobiome samples

To collect aerobiome samples, we used a passive sampling technique, following established protocols22,26. We installed petri dishes (100 mm × 15 mm) with Velcro tabs on the sampling stations at four sampling heights: ground level (i.e., 0.0 m), 0.5 m, 1 m, and 2 m. As with soil samples, aerobiome samples were collected on three consecutive days. The total height of the sampling station was 2 m from ground level (95% of typical adult male heights lie within 2 SD at 1.93 m, and 1.78 m for females based on a study across Europe, North America, Australia and East-Asia)58. Various human characteristics informed the height selection (e.g., representation of adults vs. children, and different activities such as sitting, crawling, walking)27,59,60. We decontaminated the steel plates supporting the petri dishes with 5% Decon 90 solution.

We secured the petri dishes to the sampling stations (Fig. 8), leaving them open for 6–8 h22, and closing them at the end of the sampling period. To reduce contamination, new disposable laboratory gloves were worn for each vertical sampling point. Once sampling was complete, we sealed the petri dishes using Parafilm, labelled and transported them to the laboratory (on ice) for storage at – 80 °C26. We collected field control samples by leaving unused petri dishes for 60 s in the equipment box and sealing them at each site.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

We extracted DNA from soil and air samples at the facilities of the Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum. Using a digital number randomiser, we processed samples on a randomised basis. We processed the low biomass air samples prior to the higher biomass soil samples to minimise cross-contamination.

To extract DNA, we swabbed the petri dishes in the lab using nylon-flocked swabs (FLOQSwabs Cat. No. 501CS01, Copan Diagnostics Inc.)5,26,27,61. All swabbing was carried out in a laminar flow cabinet type 1 (License no. 926207) and each sample was swabbed for 30 s. Samples from the base and lids of each petri dish for each height were pooled (intra-height pooling only). We cut the swabs directly into Eppendorf tubes (2 mL). We used Qiagen QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kits to extract DNA from the swabs and extraction blank controls. For extraction blank controls, we used sterile water and reagents instead of a sample and all DNA extraction steps were performed as if they were normal samples. To extract DNA from the soil samples (and extraction blank controls), we used Qiagen DNAeasy PowerLyzer Soil Kits and followed the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification was conducted in triplicate using the 341F/806R primer targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (5′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG- 3′/5′-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3′). The 300 bp paired end run was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform at the Australian Genome Research Facility using two flowcells (ID 000000000-CW9V6 and 000000000-CVPGT). We conducted image analysis in real-time by the MiSeq Control Software (v2.6.2.1) and Real Time Analysis (v1.18.54). We used the Illumina bcl2fastq ( pipeline to generate sequence data.

Bioinformatics and statistical analysis

Raw 16S rRNA gene sequences processing, OTU picking, taxonomic assignments, and decontamination were as per Robinson et al. (2020) (described in detail in Supplementary Materials, Appendix A). To estimate OTU alpha diversity we derived Shannon Index values5 in phyloseq62 in R. Prior to analysis of compositional data, we used centre log-ratio (clr) transformations63. Information acquired from this approach is directly relatable to the environment64. We generated violin plots with ggplot265 to visualise the distribution of the alpha diversity scores for each habitat and height. Bacterial beta diversity was visualised using ordination plots of Aitchison distances based on clr-transformations of OTU abundances. Ordination plots show low-dimensional ordination space in which similar samples are plotted close together, and dissimilar samples are plotted far apart.

We used permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) to test for compositional differences between different sites, habitats and sampling heights, and permutation tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions using vegan66 in R. Pearson's product-moment and Spearman’s rank correlation tests were used to examine correlations between habitat, sampling height and alpha diversity scores. Using phyloseq, we calculated OTU relative abundances to examine the distribution of taxa that may have potential implications for public health. We used DESeq267 in R to conduct differential abundance analysis for all air samples based on log‐twofold‐change. To compare presence and proportions of taxa we used 2-sample tests for equality of proportions with continuity corrections. We also applied bootstrap resampling to assign a measure of accuracy to sample estimates for the Spearman’s correlations, using a minimum of 1000 iterations. This was carried out with the psych68 and boot69 packages in R.

In order to understand the effect of vertical stratification on bacterial interactions and community structures, we evaluated association-networks of bacterial OTUs. We combined the OTU database from 0 to 0.5 m and 1 to 2 m for each site, and constructed two networks per site (i.e., lower and upper height), such that in total six networks were evaluated across the three habitats. In the evaluated network, nodes represent OTUs and links exists between a pair of OTUs if their frequencies are significantly associated (absolute abundance > 0.7, p ≤ 0.01). The type of association, whether positive or negative, was represented with blue and red links, respectively. To account for compositional bias associated with OTU data, we used SparCC70 to define associations, and only OTUs with sequence counts > 10 were included. Randomly permuted (n = 100) data were used to estimate significance of associations, and igraph71 was used to visualize and evaluate the plots. We also ran Spearman’s correlation tests with bootstrap resampling to determine whether environmental metadata (pH, temperature, windspeed) associated with bacterial alpha diversity. Outliers were considered as data points more than 1.5× above the third quartile or below the first quartile.

Geospatial analyses

We investigated possible relationships between aerobiome samples and surrounding vegetation properties using spatial buffer zones. For the buffer analysis, we used vector geoprocessing tools in QGIS 3. Buffer sizes of 10 m, 25 m, 50 m, and 100 m were considered appropriate for the study scale. Similar distances have been used in previous green space and epidemiology studies31,72,73,74. A 100 m maximum buffer radius was chosen; at greater distances, effects would no longer be local to the sampling points (i.e., they would overlap with other sampling points). To determine tree canopy cover within each buffer radii, ESRI shapefiles were imported into i-Tree Canopy75. This enabled random sampling points (between 50 and 250 points per buffer) and selection of land cover classification and associated metrics overlaid with Landsat 8 satellite imagery75,76,77. Tree count and distance measures were acquired using geometry tools in QGIS 3. We explored the potential relationship between tree metrics and mean bacterial alpha diversity values of combined air-only sampling heights (n = 27 samples).

Data availability

All data and code used in this study are available on the UK Data Service ReShare. Data collection ID: 854551.


  1. 1.

    Rook, G. A., Martinelli, R. & Brunet, L. R. Innate immune responses to mycobacteria and the downregulation of atopic responses. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 3, 337–342 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dannemiller, K. C. et al. Next-generation DNA sequencing reveals that low fungal diversity in house dust is associated with childhood asthma development. Indoor Air 24, 236–247 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stein, M. M. et al. Innate immunity and asthma risk in Amish and Hutterite farm children. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 411–421 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arleevskaya, M. I., Aminov, R., Brooks, W. H., Manukyan, G. & Renaudineau, Y. Shaping of human immune system and metabolic processes by viruses and microorganisms. Front Microbiol. 10, 816 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liddicoat, C. et al. Naturally-diverse airborne environmental microbial exposures modulate the gut microbiome and may provide anxiolytic benefits in mice. Sci. Total Environ. 701, 134684 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rook, G. A., Raison, C. L. & Lowry, C. A. Microbiota, immunoregulatory old friends and psychiatric disorders. In Microbial Endocrinology: The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Health and Disease 2014 319–356 (Springer, 2014).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rook, G. A. Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: An ecosystem service essential to health. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 18360–18367 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schwinge, D. & Schramm, C. Sex-related factors in autoimmune liver diseases. In Seminars in Immunopathology, Voxl 41, No 2 165–175 (Springer, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Prescott, S. L. A butterfly flaps its wings: Extinction of biological experience and the origins of allergy. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 20, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Prescott, S. L. et al. The skin microbiome: Impact of modern environments on skin ecology, barrier integrity, and systemic immune programming. World Allergy Organ. J. 10, 29 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Austvoll, C. T., Gallo, V. & Montag, D. Health impact of the Anthropocene: The complex relationship between gut microbiota, epigenetics, and human health, using obesity as an example. Glob. Health Epidemiol. Genom. 5, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Haahtela, T. A biodiversity hypothesis. Allergy 74, 1445–1456 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Haahtela, T. et al. The biodiversity hypothesis and allergic disease: World allergy organization position statement. World Allergy Organ. J. 6, 1–8 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Donovan, G., Gatziolis, D., Mannetje, A. T., Weinkove, R., Fyfe, C., & Douwes, J. An empirical test of the biodiversity hypothesis: Exposure to plant diversity is associated with a reduced risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Available at SSRN 3559635 (2020).

  15. 15.

    Chen, D. et al. Clostridium butyricum, a butyrate-producing probiotic, inhibits intestinal tumor development through modulating Wnt signalling and gut microbiota. Cancer Lett. 469, 456–467 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Du, Y. et al. Butyrate protects against high-fat diet-induced atherosclerosis via up-regulating ABCA1 expression in apolipoprotein E-deficiency mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 177, 1754–1772 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li, J. Y. et al. Microbiota dependent production of butyrate is required for the bone anabolic activity of PTH. J. Clin. Invest. 20, 20 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Geirnaert, A. et al. Butyrate-producing bacteria supplemented in vitro to Crohn’s disease patient microbiota increased butyrate production and enhanced intestinal epithelial barrier integrity. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–4 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Uetake, J. et al. Seasonal changes of airborne bacterial communities over Tokyo and influence of local meteorology. Front Microbiol. 10, 1572 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Flies, E. J., Clarke, L. J., Brook, B. W. & Jones, P. Urban airborne microbial communities are less abundant and less diverse than rural counterparts-but what does that mean for our health? A systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 20, 140337 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Selway, C. A. et al. Transfer of environmental microbes to the skin and respiratory tract of humans after urban green space exposure. Environ. Int. 145, 106084 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mhuireach, G. et al. Urban greenness influences airborne bacterial community composition. Sci. Total Environ. 571, 680–687 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lymperopoulou, D. S., Adams, R. I. & Lindow, S. E. Contribution of vegetation to the microbial composition of nearby outdoor air. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 3822–3833 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Abdelfattah, A. et al. Revealing cues for fungal interplay in the plant–air interface in vineyards. Front Plant Sci. 10, 922 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Stewart, J. et al. Variation of near surface atmosphere microbial communities at an urban and a suburban site in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Sci. Total Environ. 1, 138353 (2020).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mhuireach, G. Á., Betancourt-Román, C. M., Green, J. L. & Johnson, B. R. Spatiotemporal controls on the urban aerobiome. Front Ecol. Evol. 7, 43 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Robinson, J. M. et al. Vertical stratification in urban green space aerobiomes. Environ. Health Perspect. 128, 1–12 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Robinson, J. M. & Breed, M. F. Green prescriptions and their co-benefits: Integrative strategies for public and environmental health. Challenges 10, 9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Callaghan, A. et al. The impact of green spaces on mental health in urban settings: A scoping review. J. Ment. Health 18, 1–5 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cameron, R. W. et al. Where the wild things are! Do urban green spaces with greater avian biodiversity promote more positive emotions in humans?. Urban Ecosyst. 23, 301–317 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Robinson, J. M., Jorgensen, A., Cameron, R. & Brindley, P. Let nature be thy medicine: A socioecological exploration of green prescribing in the UK. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 3460 (2020).

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yeh, C. T., Cheng, Y. Y. & Liu, T. Y. Spatial characteristics of urban green spaces and human health: An exploratory analysis of canonical correlation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 3227 (2020).

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol 215, 403–410 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Franconieri, F. et al. Rothia spp. infective endocarditis: A systematic literature review. Méd. Maladies Infect. 35, 1–8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Iljazovic, A. et al. Perturbation of the gut microbiome by Prevotella spp. enhances host susceptibility to mucosal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 14, 1–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Robinson, J. M. & Jorgensen, A. Rekindling old friendships in new landscapes: The environment–microbiome–health axis in the realms of landscape research. People Nat. 2, 339–349 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Baruch, Z. et al. Characterising the soil fungal microbiome in metropolitan green spaces across a vegetation biodiversity gradient. Fungal Ecol. 47, 100939 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mills, J. G. et al. Revegetation of urban green space rewilds soil microbiotas with implications for human health and urban design. Restor. Ecol. 20, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Honeker, L. K. et al. Gut microbiota from amish but not hutterite children protect germ-free mice from experimental asthma. In D92. The Microbiome and Lung Disease A7022–A7022 (American Thoracic Society, 2019).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Roslund, M. I. et al. Biodiversity intervention enhances immune regulation and health-associated commensal microbiota among daycare children. Sci. Adv. 6, 2578 (2020).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Laforest-Lapointe, I., Messier, C. & Kembel, S. W. Tree leaf bacterial community structure and diversity differ along a gradient of urban intensity. MSystems 2, 6 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chen, J., Jin, S. & Du, P. Roles of horizontal and vertical tree canopy structure in mitigating daytime and night-time urban heat island effects. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 89, 102060 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Straka, T. M., Wolf, M., Gras, P., Buchholz, S. & Voigt, C. C. Tree cover mediates the effect of artificial light on urban bats. Front Ecol. Evol. 7, 91 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wood, E. M. & Esaian, S. The importance of street trees to urban avifauna. Ecol. Appl. 20, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Astell-Burt, T. & Feng, X. Does sleep grow on trees? A longitudinal study to investigate potential prevention of insufficient sleep with different types of urban green space. SSM Popul. Health 10, 100497 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Woo, J. & Lee, C. J. Sleep-enhancing effects of phytoncide via behavioral, electrophysiological, and molecular modeling approaches. Exp. Neurobiol. 29, 120 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ross, S. et al. i-Tree eco analysis of landscape vegetation on remediated areas of oak ridge national laboratory. Open J. Forest. 10, 412 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Robinson, J. M., Mills, J. G. & Breed, M. F. Walking ecosystems in microbiome-inspired green infrastructure: An ecological perspective on enhancing personal and planetary health. Challenges 9, 40 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Watkins, H., Robinson, J. M., Breed, M. F., Parker, B. & Weinstein, P. Microbiome-inspired green infrastructure: A toolkit for multidisciplinary landscape design. Trends Biotechnol. 20, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Parajuli, A. et al. Urbanization reduces transfer of diverse environmental microbiota indoors. Front Microbiol. 9, 84 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Abrego, N. et al. Fungal communities decline with urbanization—more in air than in soil. ISME J. 20, 1–10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Socolar, J. B., Gilroy, J. J., Kunin, W. E. & Edwards, D. P. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 67–80 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    May, R. M. Will a large complex system be stable?. Nature 238, 413–414 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    JNCC. 2013. Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Surveys. Accessed 28 Sep 2020.

  55. 55.

    Zarraonaindia, I. et al. The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. MBio 6, 02527–02614 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Mbareche, H., Veillette, M., Pilote, J., Létourneau, V. & Duchaine, C. Bioaerosols play a major role in the nasopharyngeal microbiota content in agricultural environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 1375 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Dettwyler, K. A. A time to wean: The hominid blueprint for the natural age of weaning in modern human populations. In Breastfeeding 39–74 (Routledge, 2017).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Jelenkovic, A. et al. Genetic and environmental influences on height from infancy to early adulthood: An individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–3 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Milani, C. et al. The first microbial colonizers of the human gut: Composition, activities, and health implications of the infant gut microbiota. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81, 00036–00117 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    RCPCH. Growth Charts. 2020. Accessed on 21 Jan 2020.

  61. 61.

    Bae, S., Lyons, C. & Onstad, N. A culture-dependent and metagenomic approach of household drinking water from the source to point of use in a developing country. Water Res. X. 2, 100026 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, 61217 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Quinn, T. P. et al. A field guide for the compositional analysis of any-omics data. GigaScience 9, 107 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Gloor, G. B., Macklaim, J. M., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. J. Microbiome datasets are compositional: And this is not optional. Front Microbiol. 8, 2224 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wickham, H., & Wickham, MH. . The ggplot package. (2007).

  66. 66.

    Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, H. H., Szoecs, E., & Wagner, E. The vegan package in R. Online. Accessed on 20 Sep 2020.

  67. 67.

    Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Revel, W. The Psych R Package. 2020. Accessed on 20 Sep 2020.

  69. 69.

    Canty, A, & Ripley, B. The Boot R Package. 2020. Accessed on 20 Sep 2020.

  70. 70.

    Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, 1002687 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Csárdi, G. The igraph Package in R. Online. 2020. Accessed on 10 Aug 20.

  72. 72.

    Cusack, L., Larkin, A., Carozza, S. E. & Hystad, P. Associations between multiple green space measures and birth weight across two US cities. Health Place 47, 36–43 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Klompmaker, J. O. et al. Green space definition affects associations of green space with overweight and physical activity. Environ Res. 160, 531–540 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lee, J. Y. et al. Preventive effect of residential green space on infantile atopic dermatitis associated with prenatal air pollution exposure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 102 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    i-Tree Canopy. i-Tree Canopy. 2020. Accessed on 15 May 2020.

  76. 76.

    Richardson, J. J. & Moskal, L. M. Uncertainty in urban forest canopy assessment: Lessons from Seattle, WA, USA. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 13, 152–157 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Soltani, A. & Sharifi, E. Daily variation of urban heat island effect and its correlations to urban greenery: A case study of Adelaide. Front Arch. Res. 6, 529–538 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge and pay our respects to the Kaurna people, the traditional custodians whose ancestral lands we conducted the research on for this study. We would also like to acknowledge the City of Adelaide who helped to facilitate this study. J.M.R is undertaking a PhD through the White Rose Doctoral Training Partnership (WRDTP), funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

Author information




J.M.R. and M.F.B. contributed to the conception and design of the study; J.M.R. and C.C.D. conducted the field and lab work; J.M.R., R.A., R.P., and C.L. conducted the bioinformatics and data analysis; J.M.R. wrote the manuscript; J.M.R. produced the figures and data visualisations; J.M.R., C.C.D., R.A., R.C., R.P., C.L., P.W., and M.F.B. contributed to manuscript internal critical review process and revisions. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jake M. Robinson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robinson, J.M., Cando-Dumancela, C., Antwis, R.E. et al. Exposure to airborne bacteria depends upon vertical stratification and vegetation complexity. Sci Rep 11, 9516 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing